The development and treatment of periprosthetic leakage after prosthetic voice restoration. A literature review and personal experience part I: the development of periprosthetic leakage

A double-blind randomized clinical trial of inflammatory cytokine and pepsin levels in the saliva of patients with voice prostheses

BACKGROUND

Tracheoesophageal speech is one of the most effective method used for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. The main limitation is the need for periodic voice prothesis (VP) replacements. The process of developing VP usage complications is still unexplored. The aim of this study was to assess the level of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFα) and pepsin in saliva as potential factors reducing VP longevity.

METHODS

Prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial was conducted (NCT04268459). Patients were randomly divided into two groups depending on VP replacement regimen (regular-every 3 months, or irregular-when complications occur). Levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFα, and pepsin in saliva samples (fasting and after eating) of laryngectomized patients were measured using ELISA tests.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (26 in both groups) with control group (7 patients) participated in the study. The level of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, TNFα, and pepsin did not differ according to regularity of VP replacements (p = 0.301-0.801). IL-6 levels were significantly higher when VP complications occurs (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The saliva components were not significantly different depending on the frequency of VP replacements. IL-6 plays an important role in the development of VP use complications.

Perforator-based chimeric ulnar forearm microvascular free tissue transfer reconstruction of post-radiated tracheoesophageal puncture fistulae

Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) performed during total laryngectomy in the primary treatment of laryngeal cancer is the standard method for voice restoration. Following adjuvant radiotherapy, the TEP site can experience complications resulting in a tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) with chronic leakage making oral alimentation unsafe due to aspiration. Here, we describe a technique using chimeric ulnar artery perforator forearm free flaps (UAPFF) in the reconstruction of these complex deformities. Four patients underwent chimeric UAPFF reconstruction of TEP site TEFs following primary TL with TEP and adjuvant radiotherapy. No flap failures or surgical complications occurred. Average time from end of radiotherapy to persistent TEF was 66 months (range 4-190 months). All patients had resolution in their TEF with average time to total oral diet achievement of 22 days (14-42 days). Chimeric UAPFF reconstruction is a safe and effective method to reconstruct recalcitrant TEP site TEFs.

Surgical closure of enlarged tracheoesophageal fistula after laryngectomy: A systematic review of techniques

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were (1) systematically review the data on surgical closure of enlarged tracheoesophageal fistula after laryngectomy and (2) to perform a comparison of reconstruction of surgical techniques.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed using PRISMA methodology. Cumulative patient data were compared between patients reconstructed with vascularized tissue (sternocleidomastoid fascia and muscle, pectoralis major, deltopectoral, radial forearm) and those closed primarily (two-layer, three-layer, and tracheal transposition).

RESULTS

Fourteen studies reported outcomes for the reconstruction of tracheoesophageal fistula. Primary closure was used in 98 patients, vascularized flap in 74, and occlusive device in 8. Vascularized flap resulted in successful closure of the fistula in 89 % of cases compared to primary closure in 62 % (p = 0.0003).

CONCLUSION

Systematic review of the literature supports an improved surgical closure rate with vascularized flap interposed between the esophageal and tracheal lumens compared to primary closure.

Challenging management of an enlarged tracheoesophageal fistula in an irradiated patient

Speech restoration after total laryngectomy may be achieved in different ways, the gold standard being tracheoesophageal puncture (TPE) with the positioning of a speech prosthesis. TPE is not immune to complications, the most common of which being leakage through or around the prosthesis. When dealing with an enlarged tracheoesophageal fistula, the management can be either conservative or surgical. In the following case report, we present a particularly challenging case, in which every conservative strategies failed and a major surgery was required to close the fistula.

Prevention of periprosthetic leakage with double flange voice prosthesis: a systematic review and management protocol proposal

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the use and results of the Provox®VegaTMXtraSealTM in the prevention of periprosthetic leakage and to propose a management protocol for this voice prosthesis.

METHODS

Systematic search based on the PRISMA Statement during February 2020. Keywords were double flange, periprosthetic leakage, voice prosthesis, and laryngectomy.

RESULTS

Four articles with 315 voice prosthesis (94 XtraSeal and 221 controls) in 55 patients were found. The XtraSeal mean duration was 114.28 ± 73.2 (CI 95%, 98.29-130.26) days compared to 102.98 ± 17.74 (CI 95%, 100.62-105.35) days of the control group. Out of 266 replacements, endoprosthetic leakage was the most frequent cause in both groups (62.41%). Periprosthetic leaks were less frequent in the XtraSeal (9.62%) than in the control group (22.43%).

CONCLUSIONS

The XtraSeal could be effective in preventing periprosthetic leakage and lengthening the time between replacements. Studies with a robust methodology are necessary to confirm these results. Managing voice prosthesis is complex and requires a multidisciplinary and systematic approach by experienced professionals to reduce replacements and complications. Incorrect placement of the XtraSeal could cause a foreign body reaction and consequently inflammation, extrusion, or pressure lesions. The Tower of Hercules protocol: (1) Measurement of the tracheoesophageal fistula using the Provox® Measure, (2) Minimization of XtraSeal slack by avoiding the complete visualization of the prosthesis' blue ring, (3) Nasofibroscopic examination of the oesophageal wall confirming both flanges are in correct position; could prevent or minimize complications derived from the use of the XtraSeal.

The impact of COVID-19 on head and neck cancer patients: A review of speech valve complications and patient experience during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK

PURPOSE

Surgical voice restoration (SVR) is associated with improved patient quality of life following laryngectomy. This study aims to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with SVR and analyse the complications in this cohort of patients.

METHOD

A retrospective review of all patients with SVR at a single tertiary ear, nose, and throat (ENT) unit in the UK for 12 months during the COVID-19 pandemic, with comparison to the preceding 12 months. A survey was also administered to assess patients' experiences during the pandemic.

RESULT

Thirty-six patients were included in this study. During the pandemic period, 19.5% (n = 7) patients had significant complications, with five patients needing surgery to restore speech. In the 12 months pre-pandemic, 13.5% (n = 5) had significant complications, although none required surgery to restore speech. Six patients (19.4%) felt these complications were avoidable in normal circumstances. Further, 30.5% (n = 11) of patients reported a delay in seeking medical attention due to concerns about their vulnerability to COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on many patients with SVR. This has resulted in a large proportion of patients experiencing delayed care, a loss of voice, a need for further surgical intervention, and negative impacts on their quality of life.

Cost-Effectiveness Study of Double-Flange Voice Prostheses in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Leakage in Laryngectomized Patients

BACKGROUND

Tracheoesophageal speech with a voice prosthesis is considered the rehabilitation treatment of choice in laryngectomized patients. The main reasons for prosthesis failure are endoprosthetic leakage and periprosthetic leakage. The Provox XtraSeal^® stent incorporates an additional double flange on the esophageal side to prevent periprosthetic leakage. The objective of this study is to compare the duration and costs of the Provox Vega^® and Provox XtraSeal^® prostheses used in these patients in a tertiary university hospital.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective crossover case study of laryngectomees with Provox Vega^® who underwent Provox XtraSeal^® placement due to recurrent periprosthetic leaks and decreased theoretical prosthesis life. The duration and possible factors affecting voice prostheses were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression. A cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System with an incremental cost-effectiveness calculation.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were recruited, 35 men and 3 women, with a mean age of 66.26 ± 9.36 years old. Information was collected from 551 voice prostheses, 484 Provox Vega^® and 68 Provox XtraSeal^®. The mean duration of Provox Vega^® was 119.75 ± 148.8 days and that of Provox XtraSeal^® was 181.99 ± 166.07 days (p = 0.002). The most frequent reason for replacement was endoprosthetic leakage in both groups: 283 (60.86%) in the case of Provox Vega^® and 29 (48.33%) in that of XtraSeal^® (p < 0.000). To obtain no cost differences (ICE ~ 0) between Provox Vega and Provox XtraSeal, the latter should cost EUR 551.63.

CONCLUSIONS

The Provox XtraSeal^® is a cost-effective option in patients with increased prosthesis replacements due to periprosthetic leakage, reducing the number of replacements, increasing the duration of the prosthesis, and providing savings compared to Provox Vega^®.

Novel stapler-assisted technique for closure of persistent tracheoesophageal puncture fistula

Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is a reliable method to restore voice and is an important part of voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy. However, complications following this procedure, including peri-prosthetic leakage and resulting aspiration pneumonia, may necessitate surgical closure. In this study, we present an effective and reliable method for TEP closure using a stapler-assisted technique. Case series study for patients who underwent stapler-assisted TEP closure reviewed from 2017 to 2021. All five patients had successful closure of their TEP tract without further leakage. No postoperative bleeding, wound infection, or esophageal stenosis occurred. One patient had postoperative stomal stenosis. The stapler-assisted technique for TEP closure is easy, quick, and effective. The reliability and quick return to oral intake post-operatively make it a preferable option over previous techniques.

Troubleshooting recalcitrant tracheoesophageal prosthesis site leak with internal mammary artery perforator flap: a case report

Background

An enlarged tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) site is a grave complication of voice prosthesis rehabilitation.

Case presentation

We report a case of periprosthetic leakage with an enlarged tracheoesophageal fistula causing aspiration, not responding to conservative management and primary closure. Internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap was subsequently used in the management. The flap was successfully taken up at the recipient site with no leak post-operatively as confirmed by barium swallow, thereby preventing further aspiration.

Conclusion

Though minor degrees of TEP leak usually respond to conservative management, the recalcitrant ones require active intervention which one should be aware of.

A Multidisciplinary Approach to Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture for Voice Prosthesis Insertion Using Flexible Esophagoscopy

BACKGROUND

Tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) with voice prosthesis (VP) insertion is the gold standard of surgical voice restoration in postlaryngectomy patients. The conventional technique involves rigid esophagoscopes and trocar performed by ENT surgeons alone, with technical limitations encountered in patients with cervical abnormalities - in particular those with free or rotational flap reconstructions and postradiotherapy strictures. We report our technique using flexible endoscopy which we show to be feasible and without major safety events, as a possible consideration in the anticipated difficult TEP.

METHODS

Our study describes a multidisciplinary approach to secondary TEP involving a combined upper gastrointestinal (UGI) and (Ear, Nose, and Throat) ENT procedure, under the guidance of flexible esophagoscopy, with intraoperative involvement of the speech pathologist to guide VP insertion and placement. The procedure was performed with ease without major complications.

RESULTS

We identified nine postlaryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy patients in our institution who underwent secondary TEP with VP insertion using flexible esophagoscopy and multidisciplinary intra-operative involvement. All patients had pharyngeal reconstruction, including radial forearm free flap (n = 4), pectoralis major rotational flap (n = 3), and anterolateral thigh flap (n = 2). Eight out of nine patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The technique was successfully performed in all patients. There were three cases of early TEP displacement in two patients, of which one patient had a successful repeat procedure. We found the technique advantageous in terms of feasibility and practicality compared to the conventional approach, and without intraoperative difficulties encountered in achieving the desired field of views or navigating the challenging anatomy in a free flap and post-radiotherapy patients. This includes distorted cervical anatomy, the presence of bulky and hair-bearing flap skin, and stricture formation. Minor complications in our cohort included pharyngo-esophageal spasm, TEP displacement, granulation tissue, and peri-prosthetic leaks.

CONCLUSION

Our multidisciplinary approach to secondary TEP was performed with flexible esophagoscopy without major related complications. The technique is advantageous in the surgical approach to VP insertion in postlaryngectomy and laryngopharyngectomy patients who have had radiotherapy or pharyngeal reconstruction. It allows for safe anatomical insertion and thorough evaluation of the upper aerodigestive tract for comorbid benign or malignant esophageal pathology.

Long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of a magnet-based valve voice prosthesis for endoprosthesis leakage treatment

PURPOSE

Tracheoesophageal speech is considered the gold standard for rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. The main reason of voice prosthesis failure is the endoprosthesis leakage. Provox ActiValve^® incorporates a magnet-based valve system to achieve active closure of the valve to treat these leakages, with the drawback of being significantly more expensive. The aim of the study was to compare the Provox Vega^® and Provox ActiValve^® duration and costs in patients with replacements increase due to endoprosthetic leakage.

METHODS

Prospective case-crossover study in laryngectomized patients with Provox Vega^® and endoprosthesis leakage to whom a Provox ActiValve^® was placed. Survival and possible factors that affect voice prosthesis were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression. Cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the Spanish Public National Health System with incremental cost-effectiveness calculation was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 159 prostheses were evaluated. The most frequent reason for replacement was the endoprosthesis leakage (N = 129; 83.77%) in both models. The mean duration-time of Provox Vega^® was 44.77 ± 2.82 days (CI 95%, 39.18-50.35; median 36 days), and 317.34 ± 116.8 days (CI 95% 86.66-548; median 286 days) for the Provox ActiValve^® (p < 0.000). For every replacement not made thanks to the Provox ActiValve^® there was saving of 133.97€ CONCLUSIONS: The Provox ActiValve^® is a cost-effective solution in patients with increased prosthesis replacements due to endoprosthetic leakage, reducing the number of changes and cost compared to Provox Vega^®.

Prosthetic voice rehabilitation after laryngoesophagectomy: surgical and functional outcomes

PURPOSE

Quality of Life (QoL) after extensive head and neck resections is of paramount importance, especially after pharyngolaryngectomy or pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy where complex digestive tract reconstruction is required (with gastric pull-up or colon transposition). Tracheodigestive puncture (TDP) is the only vocal restoration option in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative complications, vocal outcomes, voice-related and swallowing-related QoL after secondary TDP in this cohort of patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in the tertiary referral center of Verona Hospital between June 2014 and June 2020. Patient demographics, clinical and surgical data were assessed. Speech objective and subjective evaluation was performed. QoL was assessed with Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaires.

RESULTS

Seven patients met the inclusion criteria, but two had died before questionnaires were administered. No intraoperative complications were noted after TDP surgery. There were delayed complications in four cases (57.1%) and all were treated with restoration. Intelligible voice was restored in all patients. Maximum phonation time and maximal voice intensity recorded were 5.42 ± 3.27 s and 65.20 ± 5.45 dB, respectively. Acceptable average VHI-10 and MDADI scores were obtained in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary TDP performed after gastric pull-up or colon transposition reconstructions are feasible and effective procedures. An intelligible voice was restored in all patients, with satisfactory patient-perceived voice-related and dysphagia-related quality-of-life outcomes.

A one-year time frame for voice prosthesis management. What should the physician expect? Is it an overrated job?

Management of late complications represents the main reason for reluctance in using voice prosthesis rehabilitation. The aim of this paper is to report our experience by describing the one-year management of a large cohort of patients in order to clarify how demanding management is in terms of burden on clinicians. Between June 2017 and June 2018, each access made at the Otolaryngology Clinic of our Institute for issues related to prosthesis by 70 laryngectomised patients rehabilitated by voice prosthesis was registered in a specific database. A review of the data provided information on the incidence, management and outcomes of adverse events encountered during the selected time frame. In addition, a T test was used to evaluate the differences between irradiated and non-irradiated patients and between primary and secondary tracheo-oesophageal-puncture. Leakage through the prosthesis was the most common cause for access (51.86%). The median number of accesses per patient per year was 3.47. The speech therapist autonomously managed 18.1% of accesses. The median number of accesses per patient per year needing a physician was 2.84. The median lifetime of the prosthesis was 4.85 months. Radiotherapy or modality (primary or secondary) of the puncture did not influence the number of accesses per year or the prosthesis lifetime. This retrospective analysis of results highlighted the most frequent issues and the most effective measures to deal with them, which allowed us to define a systematic algorithm to standardise and ease long-term outpatient management.

Regenerative Strategy for Persistent Periprosthetic Leakage around Tracheoesophageal Puncture: Is It an Effective Long-Term Solution?

Autologous tissue-assisted regenerative procedures have been considered effective to close different types of fistula, including the leakage around tracheoesophageal puncture. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review 10 years of lipotransfer for persistent periprosthetic leakage in laryngectomized patients with voice prosthesis. Clinical records of patients who experienced periprosthetic leakage from December 2009 to December 2019 were reviewed. Patients receiving fat grafting were included. The leakage around the prosthesis was assessed with a methylene blue test. Twenty patients experiencing tracheoesophageal fistula enlargement were treated with fat grafting. At the one-month follow-up, all patients were considered improved with no leakage observed. At six months, a single injection was sufficient to solve 75% of cases (n 15), whereas 25% (n 5) required a second procedure. The overall success rate was 80% (n 16). Results remained stable for a follow-up of 5.54 ± 3.97 years. Fat grafting performed around the voice prosthesis, thanks to its volumetric and regenerative properties, is a valid and lasting option to solve persistent periprosthetic leakage.

Secondary tracheoesophageal puncture with the blind technique: 10 years' experience

PROPOSE

The aim of the present article is to propose an alternative technique to the traditional secondary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy, describing the procedure step-by-step, analyzing the complications and long-term results.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent secondary TEP with the blind technique using a rigid hysterometer. The main steps in this technique are described and illustrated. Patient demographics and surgical outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were enrolled in this study. In all but one case, risk factors that could hinder rigid esophagoscopy were identified (37.5% neopharyngeal/esophageal post-surgical issues, 81.3% prior radiotherapy, 21.9% cervical arthrosis, and 12.5% prior coloplasty or gastric transposition). No intra- or postoperative surgical complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

The blind technique offers an alternative method to perform a secondary TEP safely and efficiently in patients with unfavorable anatomical or clinical conditions, lowering the risk of procedure-related complications.

Tracheoesophageal puncture closure with annular mucosal flap

BACKGROUND

To present an effective and easily applicable method for tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) closure by using a localized annular flap instead of bulky and distant flaps.

METHODS

The medical records of patients who underwent TEP closure surgery with the annular mucosal flap technique between July 2012 and August 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Fistula size, indication for closure, duration of surgery, radiotherapy status, and surgery results were analyzed.

RESULTS

We have used our technique in nine patients. No postoperative bleeding, wound infection, esophageal stenosis, and tracheostoma stenosis occurred. In all these patients except one, successful closure was achieved. None of the patients had a recurrence of the TEP.

CONCLUSION

The annular mucosal flap technique for TEP closure is easy and quick to apply. The patient's oral feeding at the sixth hour after procedure without using a nasogastric tube makes the technique preferable as a priority.

Periprosthetic Leakage in Tracheoesophageal Prosthesis: Proposal of a Standardized Therapeutic Algorithm

OBJECTIVE

Periprosthetic leakage represents the most demanding long-term complication in the voice prosthesis rehabilitation. The aim of this article is to discuss the various causes of periprosthetic leakage and to propose a systematic management algorithm.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Otolaryngology clinic of the University Polyclinic A. Gemelli-IRCCS Foundation.

METHODS

The study included 115 patients with voice prosthesis who were treated from December 2014 to December 2019. All patients who experienced periprosthetic leakage were treated with the same step-by-step therapeutic approach until it was successful. Incidence, management, and success rate of every attempt are analyzed and discussed.

RESULTS

Periprosthetic leakage was reported 330 times by 82 patients in 1374 clinic accesses. Radiotherapy, timing of tracheoesophageal puncture, and type of total laryngectomy (primary or salvage) did not influence the incidence of periprosthetic leakage. Salvage total laryngectomy increases the risk of more clinically relevant leakages.

CONCLUSION

By using a systematic algorithm with a step-by-step standardized approach, periprosthetic leakage management could become a less treacherous issue.

[GERD and adjuvant radio-chemotherapy predespose to recurrent voice prosthesis leakage]

After total laryngectomy, regaining ability to speech is a keystone in regards of life quality. Voice prostheses have been shown to be a sufficient tool for satisfying communication, although frequent replacements of prostheses are burdening certain patients. Therefore, a more accurate understanding of mechanisms of prosthetic leakage is urgently needed.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 58 Patients after laryngectomy. Additionally, we analyzed pre- and post-therapeutic CT-scans of 22 Patients regarding pharyngeal stenosis.

RESULTS

In 40 Patients, at least one replacement of voice prosthesis was documented during observation period, median device life was 235 days. Patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) showed a significantly longer device life than patients with adjuvant radio-chemotherapy (RCT, p = 0.002). Furthermore, patients suffering of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) showed a significantly shortened device life (p = 0.04).17 patients (42.5 %) suffered of clinically relevant stenosis of the neopharynx, which was treated with dilatation in 14 patients (82 %) and did not affect prosthesis device life.

CONCLUSION

GERD is a risk factor for shortened voice prosthesis' device life and therefore should be treated effectively after laryngectomy. Also, adjuvant RCT predisposes a shortened device life.Stenosis is observed frequently after laryngectomy but does not affect device life when effectively treated.

Use of double flange voice prosthesis for periprosthetic leakage in laryngectomised patients: A prospective case-crossover study

INTRODUCTION

Tracheoesophageal speech is considered the gold standard for rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. One of the main problems of voice prosthesis is the periprosthesis leakage. Provox Vega XtraSeal incorporates a double flange on the pharyngeal side of the prosthesis in order to avoid these failures. The aim of the study is to compare the device lifetime between the Provox Vega and Provox Vega XtraSeal and to examine possible related factors that influence their duration.

METHODS

Prospective case-crossover study in 20 laryngectomised patients with Provox Vega and periprothesis leakage to whom a Provox Vega XtraSeal was placed. Survival and possible factors that affect voice prosthesis were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox Proportional Hazards Regression with Schoenfeld residuals to test the possible assumptions.

RESULTS

A total of 230 prostheses were evaluated. The most frequent reason for replacement was due to an endoprosthesis leakage (n = 146, 67%) in both models. Mean lifetime of Provox Vega was 104.474 ± 7.29 days (CI 95% 90.19-118.76) and of Provox XtraSeal was 176.76 ± 26.46 days (CI 95% 124.9-228.61) (P = .012). Complementary treatment with radiotherapy demonstrated a higher device survival (P = .007).

DISCUSSION

Provox XtraSeal seems to be effective reducing the number of changes due to periprosthetic leakage, thus increasing the survival of voice prosthesis.

Provox 2® and Provox Vega® device life-time: a case-crossover study with multivariate analysis of possible influential factors and duration

INTRODUCTION

Tracheoesophageal speech is considered the gold standard for rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. Current literature is limited and contradictory about the possible causes of device failure. The aim of the study is to compare the device life-time between the Provox 2 and Provox Vega and to examine possible related factors that influence their duration.

METHODS

Retrospective case-crossover study in 34 laryngectomized patients who had undergone tracheoesophageal voice rehabilitation using indwelling Provox 2 and Provox Vega voice prostheses between 2010 and 2016 in a tertiary care centre.

RESULTS

A total of 440 prostheses were evaluated. The most frequent reason for replacement was due to an endoprosthesis leakage (n = 221, 64.2%) in both models. Radiotherapy increases the risk of prosthesis replacement (IRR = 1.88, p = 0.007) as well as bilateral neck dissection (IRR = 1.56, p = 0.017) in Provox 2. Age and unilateral neck dissection do not seem to influence the duration of the prosthesis. Mean life-time of Provox 2 was 106.64 days and 124.19 days for Provox Vega (p = 0.261). Complementary treatment with radiotherapy demonstrated a lower device survival (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Results confirmed the non-significant differences on device life between Provox Vega and Provox 2, as well as the relevant role of radiotherapy treatment in the increase of replacements and diminution of the device duration.

An Investigation of the Post-laryngectomy Swallow Using Videofluoroscopy and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)

This study investigates the post-laryngectomy swallow. Presence and degree of residue on the post-laryngectomy swallow as observed on videofluoroscopy and FEES is described. In addition, videofluoroscopy and FEES are assessed for reliability and inter-instrument agreement. 30 laryngectomy subjects underwent dysphagia evaluation using simultaneous videofluoroscopy and FEES. These were reviewed post-examination by three expert raters using a rating scale designed for this purpose. Raters were blinded to subject details, type of laryngectomy surgery, pairing of FEES and videofluoroscopy examinations and the scores of other raters. There was a finding of residue in 78% of videofluoroscopy ratings, and 83% of FEES ratings. Comparison of the tools indicated poor inter-rater reliability and poor inter-instrument agreement. Dysphagia is an issue post laryngectomy as measured by patient self-report and by instrumental evaluation. However, alternative dysphagia rating tools and dysphagia evaluation tools are required to enable accurate identification and intervention for underlying swallow physiology post laryngectomy.

[Solving problems after rehabilitation with voice prostheses : Two rare cases of fistula-related complications]

During the past three decades, the use of voice prostheses has developed worldwide into the gold standard for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Insertion of a voice prosthesis is a simple and rapid surgical procedure, which is associated with a low rate of complications. The current article describes the cases of 2 patients showing a rapid development of granulation tissue around the voice fistula, leading to complete incarceration of the prosthesis and subtotal/total stenosis of the neopharynx.