Intratympanic corticosteroids injections: a systematic review of literature

Outer hair cells stir cochlear fluids

Recent observations regarding the non-selective action of outer hair cells contradict frequency-selective cochlear amplification. We hypothesized that active outer hair cells drive cochlear fluid circulation. The hypothesis was tested by delivering a neurotoxin, kainic acid, to the round window of young gerbil cochleae while monitoring auditory responses in the cochlear nucleus. Sounds presented at a modest level significantly expedited kainic acid delivery. When outer-hair-cell motility was suppressed by salicylate, the facilitation effect was compromised. A low-frequency tone was more effective than broadband noise, especially for drug delivery to apical locations. Computational model simulations provided the physical basis for our observation, which incorporated solute diffusion, fluid advection, fluid-structure interaction, and outer-hair-cell motility. Active outer hair cells deformed the organ of Corti like a peristaltic tube to generate apically streaming flows along the tunnel of Corti and basally streaming flows along the scala tympani. Our measurements and simulations coherently indicate that broadband outer-hair-cell action is for cochlear fluid circulation.

Finite-element modelling of interactions of needle with tympanic membrane and middle ear

The tympanic membrane (TM) is one of the most common routes to access the middle ear and inner ear for the treatment of hearing and balance pathologies. Since the TM is a soft thin biological tissue with small dimensions, using needles seems to be among the most practical interventional approaches. In this study, we proposed a finite-element (FE) analysis of needle-TM interactions that combines a 3D model of the TM and other main middle-ear structures in gerbil, and a 2D model of needle insertion into the TM based on the cohesive zone method (CZM). The TM was modelled using a 1st-order Ogden hyperelastic material and its properties were obtained by fitting to the experimental force-displacement plots of large deformation in the TM under needle indentation. The cohesive parameters were also acquired by calibrating the puncture force against the experimental data of needle insertion into the TM. These FE models were then used to obtain the deformation behaviour of the TM and other middle-ear structures due to the insertion force applied at different locations on the TM. Moreover, we investigated the effect of the TM thickness, the geometry of the needle (i.e., diameter and tip angle), and needle material on the insertion of needles into the TM. We also studied the penetration success of deformable needles.

Pharmacological Interventions for Menière's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective: Evaluation of the effectiveness and posttreatment effects of intratympanic gentamicin and corticosteroids in treating patients with Ménière's disease (MD). Methods: Based on PubMed and Embase databases, randomized controlled trials using intratympanic injections of 4 drugs (gentamicin, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone, and placebo) for the treatment of MD were searched from 1995 to October 2023, and the literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data were netted for meta-analysis using Stata 17. Results: A total of 13 studies were selected, involving 559 participants, with follow-up time ranging from 3 to 28 months. Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in pure-tone average between gentamicin and dexamethasone [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) (-0.42, 0.24), P < .05]. Compared to placebo, intratympanic injection of gentamicin [risk ratio (RR) = 1.18, 95% CI (0.43, 1.93)], methylprednisolone [RR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.07, 1.70)], and dexamethasone [RR = 0.70, 95% CI (-0.01, 1.41)] all showed better efficacy in treating vertigo. For the treatment of tinnitus, the SUCRA ranking results showed that dexamethasone was the most effective, followed by methylprednisolone and gentamicin. Conclusion: Pharmacological intervention is more effective than placebo in treating MD. Although gentamicin treatment shows significant effects in treating vertigo, corticosteroid combination therapy is markedly superior to gentamicin in controlling hearing loss and vertigo symptoms.

Endolymphatic duct blockage surgery vs. intratympanic steroids for treatment of refractory Ménière's disease

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of the Endolymphatic duct blockage (EDB) and intratympanic methylprednisolone(ITMP) injection to control refractory Ménière's disease(MD) symptoms and evaluate their impact on hearing level.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study in a tertiary care center.

METHODS

36 received ITMP injection and 52 EDB. Mean outcome measures at 24 months included vertigo control, tinnitus, aural fullness and hearing level: pure-tone average (PTA), bone conduction average(BCA) and speech discrimination score(SDS).

RESULTS

At 24 months postoperatively, 90.4% of the EDB group had complete control of vertigo and 43.4% of the ITMP group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in tinnitus or aural fullness control (p = 0.34 and p 0.21 respectively). In each group, the drop in tinnitus and aural fullness frequency at 24 months were significant for EDB (p = 0.03; p < 0.001 respectively) and for ITMP group in tinnitus (p = 0.03) but not aural fullness (p = 0.063). At 24 months, PTA, BCA and SDS were significantly worst in the ITMP group when compared to preoperative levels (p = 0.038, p = 0.027, p = 0.016). PTA in the EDB group was stable with no difference compared to ITMP group (p = 0.48). BCA and SDS in the EDB group were stable and better than the ITMP group (p = 0.032; p = 0.036). In each group, vestibular paresis was not significantly different before (p = 0.06) and after treatment (p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

EDB is more effective than the ITMP for controlling the vertigo symptoms of Ménière's disease and in preserving hearing function. It is a novel surgical technique with promising results for a complete treatment of Ménière's disease. ITMP decreases the frequency and the severity of the symptoms but only control vertigo in 27.8% of cases.

Efficacy of high dose systemic versus combined (systemic and intratympanic) corticosteroid therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A prospective randomized trial and risk factor analysis

The pathophysiology and the proper treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) are an ongoing subject of debate. Locally or systemic administered corticosteroids are the most accepted drugs of treatment in reference to ISSNHL (idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss), however, no strong evidence nor guidelines regarding their effectiveness yet exists. In our prospective, randomized, controlled trial 78 participants were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned based on the day of admission to two groups according to treatment: group SS (n = 43) received intravenous systemic methylprednisolone alone, and group CT (n = 35) received intratympanic dexamethasone + systemic methylprednisolone. The primary outcome was to compare the hearing outcomes between the treatment groups based on different, widely accepted categories (Siegel, Kanzaki, modified Siegel and PTA4 gain). In consideration of the secondary outcome, we examined the effect of the various risk factors on the hearing improvement. No differences were detected regarding hearing improvement between the two groups, based on any criteria [Siegel's criteria (p = 0.604); Kanzaki's criteria (p = 0.720); modified Siegel's criteria (p = 0.524) and PTA 4 gain (p = 0.569)]. However, several clinical factors such as vertigo (p = 0.039), or cardiovascular comorbidity (p = 0.02) and the severity of initial hearing loss (p = 0.033) were found to bear a significant impact upon the hearing outcome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial comparing high dose systemic and combination corticosteroid therapy in ISSNHL patients. Our findings suggest coexisting cardiovascular comorbidity, vertigo and severity of the initial hearing loss may bear a significantly higher impact upon hearing improvement, than the additional intratympanic steroid administration. The presented trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (name: Combinated systemic and intratympanic steroid therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, No.: 2017-000658-20) and with the ethical approval of The National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (OGYÉI) (protocol No.: 7621, on 2017.02.16.).

[Intratympanic Drug Application - Indication and Procedure]

Neurootologic disorders of the inner ear associated with symptoms such as tinnitus, vertigo, and hearing loss are common and often cause significant distress to affected patients. Treatment options are usually limited. There are now some indications for which intratympanic drug application is a possible treatment option. Intratympanic drug administration is a simple, inexpensive therapy option with few side effects that can be used on an outpatient basis. Therefore, it should not be disregarded when indicated.

Altered static and dynamic intrinsic brain activity in unilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Introduction

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSHL) is a critical otologic emergency characterized by a rapid decline of at least 30 dB across three consecutive frequencies in the pure-tone audiogram within a 72-hour period. This audiological condition has been associated with alterations in brain cortical and subcortical structures, as well as changes in brain functional activities involving multiple networks. However, the extent of cerebral intrinsic brain activity disruption in SSHL remains poorly understood. The aimed of this study is to investigate intrinsic brain activity alterations in SSHL using static and dynamic fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (fALFF) analysis.

Methods

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were acquired from a cohort of SSHL patients (unilateral, n = 102) and healthy controls (n = 73). Static and dynamic fALFF methods were employed to analyze the acquired fMRI data, enabling a comprehensive examination of intrinsic brain activity changes in SSHL.

Results

Our analysis revealed significant differences in static fALFF patterns between SSHL patients and healthy controls. SSHL patients exhibited decreased fALFF in the left fusiform gyrus, left precentral gyrus, and right inferior frontal gyrus, alongside increased fALFF in the left inferior frontal gyrus, left superior frontal gyrus, and right middle temporal gyrus. Additionally, dynamic fALFF analysis demonstrated elevated fALFF in the right superior frontal gyrus and right middle frontal gyrus among SSHL patients. Intriguingly, we observed a positive correlation between static fALFF in the left fusiform gyrus and the duration of hearing loss, shedding light on potential temporal dynamics associated with intrinsic brain activity changes.

Discussion

The observed disruptions in intrinsic brain activity and temporal dynamics among SSHL patients provide valuable insights into the functional reorganization and potential compensatory mechanisms linked to hearing loss. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the underlying neural alterations in SSHL, which could pave the way for the development of targeted interventions and rehabilitation strategies aimed at optimizing SSHL management.

Methylprednisolone sodium succinate retroauricular injection combined with acupuncture in the treatment of Bell's Palsy

Background

Retroauricular injection is a local steroid hormone administration method commonly used to treat deafness or tinnitus. The acute stage of Bell's Palsy is an acute disease that requires steroid therapy. Retroauricular injection may replace oral administration of steroid hormones in the treatment of this disease as well as reduce the occurrence of adverse reactions.

Methods

This study included patients with Bell's Palsy within seven days of onset. A total of 120 patients were enrolled as the study subjects and randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group. Both groups received routine acupuncture treatment and took a traditional Chinese medicine decoction corresponding with the syndrome type. Methylprednisolone sodium succinate was injected into the bone surface of retroauricula in the experimental group, and prednisone acetate was orally administered in the control group. The main outcome indicators were the House-Brackmann (HB) grade, the facial disability index (FDI), and time of postauricular pain after one month of treatment.

Results

There were no significant differences in the HB grade (2.00 ± 1.06 vs. 1.88 ± 1.06, P=), FDIP (97.25 ± 6.00 vs. 97.17 ± 7.39, P=), and FDIS (0.60 ± 3.02 vs. 1.33 ± 4.27, P=) at 30 days after treatment between the two groups (P > 0.05). Postauricular pain disappeared earlier in the experimental group (3.66 ± 1.67 days) than in the control group (6.31 ± 2.34); the difference was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001). The adverse reaction rate was lower in the experimental group (15.00%) than in the control group (21.66%).

Interpretation

Although the dose of steroid hormone injected into the bone surface of retroauricula in the treatment of Bell's Palsy is lower than the administered dose of oral hormones, it has the same curative effect; however, it has a better effect regarding to the duration of postauricular pain and adverse reactions.

Hearing Outcomes Following Endolymphatic Duct Blockage Surgery and Factors Associated with Improved Audition at Two Years Follow-Up

Objective: To evaluate hearing outcomes at 2 years post endolymphatic duct blockage (EDB) surgery, with an analysis of factors that may predict hearing improvement. Study Design: Retrospective comparative study. Setting: Tertiary care center. Subjects: Definite Ménière's Disease (MD) patients undergoing EDB for refractory disease. Methods: Chart review was conducted to assign cases to one of the three hearing outcome groups (deteriorated, stable, and improved). All cases that met our inclusion criteria were selected. Preoperative data collected were audiograms, bithermal caloric tests, preoperative vertigo episodes, history of previous ear surgery for Ménière, intratympanic steroid injections (ITS) and intraoperative endolymphatic sac (ELS) tear or opening. Postoperative data collected at 24 months were audiograms, vertigo episodes and bithermal caloric testing. Results: Preoperative vertigo episodes, caloric paresis and history of surgery, ITS injections or ELS integrity, as well as postoperative vertigo class distribution and caloric paresis changes were not different between our groups. Preoperative word recognition score (WRS) was lowest in the improved hearing group (p = 0.032). The persistence of tinnitus at 2 years postoperatively was associated with deteriorated hearing (p = 0.033). Conclusions: There are no strong predictors of hearing improvement on presentation pre-EDB, but low preoperative WRS may be the best estimator available. Therefore, ablative interventions should be considered very carefully in patients presenting with low WRS, as they may benefit more from EDB; there is a fair chance of a good hearing outcome with EDB surgery. Persistence of tinnitus can reflect deteriorating audition. Vertigo control and hearing preservation are independent outcomes of EDB surgery, making it desirable as an early intervention for refractory MD cases.

Immunohistochemical localization of glucocorticoid receptors in the human cochlea

In the present study we investigated the localization of glucocorticoid receptors (GCR) in the human inner ear using immunohistochemistry. Celloidin-embedded cochlear sections of patients with normal hearing (n = 5), patients diagnosed with MD (n = 5), and noise induced hearing loss (n = 5) were immunostained using GCR rabbit affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies and secondary fluorescent or HRP labeled antibodies. Digital fluorescent images were acquired using a light sheet laser confocal microscope. In celloidin-embedded sections GCR-IF was present in the cell nuclei of hair cells and supporting cells of the organ of Corti. GCR-IF was detected in cell nuclei of the Reisner's membrane. GCR-IF was seen in cell nuclei of the stria vascularis and the spiral ligament. GCR-IF was found in the spiral ganglia cell nuclei, however, spiral ganglia neurons showed no GCR-IF. Although GCRs were found in most cell nuclei of the cochlea, the intensity of IF was differential among the different cell types being more intense in supporting cells than in sensory hair cells. The differential expression of GCR receptors found in the human cochlea may help to understand the site of action of glucocorticoids in different ear diseases.

A Prospective Study to Elucidate the Efficacy of 4 Oral Prednisolone Regimens in Acute Acoustic Trauma

Noise induced hearing loss affects around 5% of the population and acoustic trauma to military personnel accounts for 30% of all injuries inflicted during active service. Initial treatment for acoustic trauma involves administration of steroids, however there are no studies regarding oral steroid regimens for best outcomes. Comparing and elucidating the benefits of four oral steroid regimens on hearing gain in patients with acute acoustic trauma. A prospective study of 4 different steroid regimens was done in 200 soldiers from July 2014 - July 2020. In the first group, oral Prednisolone 60 mg was administered for 6 days, in the second group for 8 days, in the third group for 10 days and in the fourth group for 12 days. Medication was tapered over the next 5 days in all the groups. Data analysed included demographics, Pure Tone Audiograms at admission and at 4 weeks, time of reporting to hospital, onset of treatment and type of treatment given. Multivariate linear regression model was done to consider the risk factors responsible for average hearing gain at all pure tones. Box-and-whisker plot, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, Kruskal Wallis test, Reciever Operating Characteristic curve were used to analyse the independent samples. p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Age, time of onset of prednisolone therapy and acoustic trauma due to blast or gunshot injury did not show correlation (R2 = 0.01, 0.01 and 0.35 respectively and p = 0.09, 0.71, 0.80 respectively). Prednisolone therapy, average initial hearing at pure tones were considered as factors responsible for hearing gain as they showed correlation (R2 = 0.22, and 0.34 respectively and p < 0.001 and < 0.01 respectively). Significant hearing gain was found in all groups. The hearing gain was statistically better in group 3 and 4 as compared to group 1 and 2. There was no statistically significant difference in hearing gain between groups 3 and 4. So there was no additional advantage of giving 60 mg oral prednisolone for more than 10 days. The best oral prednisolone regimen recommended is 60 mg/day for 10 days which is tapered over the next 5 days.

Intratympanic Dexamethasone in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss can be a frightening experience for the sufferer and needs immediate treatment. Systemic steroid therapy has been the mainstay of treatment of this condition but concerns about their side effects has led to their use by intratympanic injection. We studied the results of intratympanic dexamethasone (IT-Dexa) both as a primary therapy and as salvage treatment after failure of oral steroids. A total of 39 patients of SSNHL were studied prospectively. Of these 23 were given oral steroids. Ten of these showed no response and were treated with IT-Dexa 4 mg/ml twice a week for two weeks. In addition, 16 patients who reported later than two weeks or had concomitant medical disorders like diabetes and/or hypertension were treated with IT-Dexa. While oral steroids showed hearing improvement (≥ 10 dB) in 56.5% patients, the recovery rate was 62.5% and 80% in those treated primarily with IT-Dexa and as salvage therapy respectively. There was a negative correlation of delay in institution of treatment with hearing recovery. Conclusion: intratympanic dexamethasone is a safe and effective treatment and should be offered to patients as a primary treatment modality and also as salvage therapy after failure of oral steroids. For best results the treatment should be started at the earliest.

Repurposable Drugs That Interact with Steroid Responsive Gene Targets for Inner Ear Disease

Corticosteroids, oral or transtympanic, remain the mainstay for inner ear diseases characterized by hearing fluctuation or sudden changes in hearing, including sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL), Meniere's disease (MD), and autoimmune inner ear disease (AIED). Despite their use across these diseases, the rate of complete recovery remains low, and results across the literature demonstrates significant heterogeneity with respect to the effect of corticosteroids, suggesting a need to identify more efficacious treatment options. Previously, our group has cross-referenced steroid-responsive genes in the cochlea with published single-cell and single-nucleus transcriptome datasets to demonstrate that steroid-responsive differentially regulated genes are expressed in spiral ganglion neurons (SGN) and stria vascularis (SV) cell types. These differentially regulated genes represent potential druggable gene targets. We utilized multiple gene target databases (DrugBank, Pharos, and LINCS) to identify orally administered, FDA approved medications that potentially target these genes. We identified 42 candidate drugs that have been shown to interact with these genes, with an emphasis on safety profile, and tolerability. This study utilizes multiple databases to identify drugs that can target a number of druggable genes in otologic disorders that are commonly treated with steroids, providing a basis for establishing novel repurposing treatment trials.

Probability of clinically significant hearing recovery following salvage intratympanic steroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the ‘real world’

Objective

This study aimed to determine the probability of hearing recovery in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss following salvage intratympanic steroids

Method

A retrospective review of all patients receiving salvage intratympanic steroid injections for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss was performed (January 2014 to December 2019). Twenty-two patients were identified, of whom 15 met inclusion criteria. Pre- and post-treatment audiograms were compared with the unaffected ear. Hearing recovery was categorised based on American Academy of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery criteria.

Results

Only 1 patient out of 15 (6.7 per cent) made a partial recovery, and the remainder were non-responders. The median duration of time between symptom onset and first salvage intratympanic steroid treatment was 52 days (range, 14–81 days). No adverse reactions were observed.

Conclusion

‘Real world’ patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss present differently to those in the literature. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss should be diagnosed with care and intratympanic steroid injections initiated early if considered appropriate. Patients should make an informed decision on treatment based on prognostic factors and local success rates.

Evaluation of prednisolone and prednisolone sodium succinate concentrations in human plasma and inner ear perilymph during cochlear implantation 24 h after intratympanic injection

BACKGROUND

The use of intratympanic (IT) steroids has drastically increased over the past 10-15 years to manage many otological pathologies.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the concentrations of prednisolone and prednisolone sodium succinate (SS) in the plasma and inner ear perilymph of participants who underwent cochlear implantation 24 h after IT injection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a prospective comparative randomized study. Twenty participants received an IT injection of prednisolone SS ∼24 h before the cochlear implantation. The other five participants received an IT saline injection and represented the control group. Perilymph and blood were sampled during the cochlear implantation surgery.

RESULTS

Both prednisolone and prednisolone SS were still present in perilymph ∼24 h after the IT administration. Only prednisolone was present in the blood plasma of seven participants (35%).

CONCLUSION

IT injection of prednisolone SS resulted in high perilymph concentrations of prednisolone and prednisolone SS, which could stay in the perilymph for at least 24 h. Using a mini-endoscope during the IT injection may effectively detect barriers infront of the round window membrane, increasing the drug concentration in the inner ear.

SIGNIFICANCE

IT injection is an effective method for delivering prednisolone to the inner ear.

Safety and Efficacy of Intratympanic Histamine Injection as an Adjuvant to Dexamethasone in a Noise-induced Murine Model

The safety and efficacy of intratympanic (IT) histamine (HIS) injection as an adjuvant to increase the inner ear penetration of dexamethasone (DEX) was investigated in this study. IT injections of DEX-only, 1% HIS+DEX and 4% HIS+DEX were performed in mice with noise-induced hearing loss. An inflammatory reaction in the middle ear was observed only in the 4% HIS+DEX group although no serious cytotoxic effects on the organ of Corti (OC) were observed at that concentration. Compared with the DEX-only group, the perilymphatic concentration of DEX was approximately two times higher in the 1% HIS+DEX group and approximately five times higher in the 4% HIS+DEX group. The expression of the DEX receptor in the cochlea was significantly increased in the 4%-HIS+DEX group. HIS appeared to induce transient damage the microstructure of the RWM with recovery observed within 3 weeks. The 1% and 4% HIS + DEX groups showed a significant recovery of the OC compared with the control group and they also achieved significantly better hearing restoration at 8 kHz in the DPOAE hearing test (P < .05) when compared to the DEX-only group. IT HIS temporarily disrupts the structure of the RWM and middle ear mucosa and significantly enhances the inner ear penetration of DEX. Therefore, IT HIS injection could be a simple and effective adjuvant therapy to increase perilymph concentration of DEX and achieve OC recovery after cochlear damage.

[Tolerance and acceptance of intratympanic injections]

Hintergrund

Die intratympanale Gabe von Steroiden ist Bestandteil der Therapie von akuten Hörverlusten. Bislang existieren nur wenig Daten zur Akzeptanz und Toleranz aus Sicht der Patient*innen.

Material und Methoden

Zu den gesundheitlichen Voraussetzungen und den Umstäden ihrer intratympanalen Therapie wurden 84 Patient*innen befragt.

Ergebnisse

Es stellten sich 38 Frauen und 46 Männer im Alter von durchschnittlich 57,2 Jahren meist auf Empfehlung ihres HNO-Arztes zur Zweitlinientherapie vor und empfanden die Injektionen zu 3,6 % als schmerzhaft, 22,6 % unangenehm, 67,9 % erträglich und zu 41,7 % als schmerzfrei (Mehrfachnennungen möglich). Eine Weiterempfehlung gaben 77,4 %, eine fehlende Empfehlung resultierte aus mangelnder Wirkung und unangenehmer Empfindung.

Schlussfolgerung

Der weit überwiegende Anteil der Behandelten beurteilt die intratympanale Therapie als erträglich und gibt eine Weiterempfehlung. Die enge Patientenführung ist ein entscheidender Therapiebaustein.

Intratympanic corticosteroids for sudden sensorineural hearing loss

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is common, and defined as a sudden decrease in sensorineural hearing sensitivity of unknown aetiology. Systemic corticosteroids are widely used, however their value remains unclear. Intratympanic injections of corticosteroids have become increasingly common in the treatment of ISSNHL.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of intratympanic corticosteroids in people with ISSNHL.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; CENTRAL (2021, Issue 9); PubMed; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials (search date 23 September 2021).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving people with ISSNHL and follow-up of over a week. Intratympanic corticosteroids were given as primary or secondary treatment (after failure of systemic therapy).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods, including GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence. Our primary outcome was change in hearing threshold with pure tone audiometry. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of people whose hearing improved, final hearing threshold, speech audiometry, frequency-specific hearing changes and adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 studies, comprising 2133 analysed participants. Some studies had more than two treatment arms and were therefore relevant to several comparisons. Studies investigated intratympanic corticosteroids as either primary (initial) therapy or secondary (rescue) therapy after failure of initial treatment. 1. Intratympanic corticosteroids versus systemic corticosteroids as primary therapy We identified 16 studies (1108 participants). Intratympanic therapy may result in little to no improvement in the change in hearing threshold (mean difference (MD) -5.93 dB better, 95% confidence interval (CI) -7.61 to -4.26; 10 studies; 701 participants; low-certainty). We found little to no difference in the proportion of participants whose hearing was improved (risk ratio (RR) 1.04, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.12; 14 studies; 972 participants; moderate-certainty). Intratympanic therapy may result in little to no difference in the final hearing threshold (MD -3.31 dB, 95% CI -6.16 to -0.47; 7 studies; 516 participants; low-certainty). Intratympanic therapy may increase the number of people who experience vertigo or dizziness (RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.41 to 4.54; 1 study; 250 participants; low-certainty) and probably increases the number of people with ear pain (RR 15.68, 95% CI 6.22 to 39.49; 2 studies; 289 participants; moderate-certainty). It also resulted in persistent tympanic membrane perforation (range 0% to 3.9%; 3 studies; 359 participants; very low-certainty), vertigo/dizziness at the time of injection (1% to 21%, 3 studies; 197 participants; very low-certainty) and ear pain at the time of injection (10.5% to 27.1%; 2 studies; 289 participants; low-certainty). 2. Intratympanic plus systemic corticosteroids (combined therapy) versus systemic corticosteroids alone as primary therapy We identified 10 studies (788 participants). Combined therapy may have a small effect on the change in hearing threshold (MD -8.55 dB better, 95% CI -12.48 to -4.61; 6 studies; 435 participants; low-certainty). The evidence is very uncertain as to whether combined therapy changes the proportion of participants whose hearing is improved (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.41; 10 studies; 788 participants; very low-certainty). Combined therapy may result in slightly lower (more favourable) final hearing thresholds but the evidence is very uncertain, and it is not clear whether the change would be important to patients (MD -9.11 dB, 95% CI -16.56 to -1.67; 3 studies; 194 participants; very low-certainty). Some adverse effects only occurred in those who received combined therapy. These included persistent tympanic membrane perforation (range 0% to 5.5%; 5 studies; 474 participants; very low-certainty), vertigo or dizziness at the time of injection (range 0% to 8.1%; 4 studies; 341 participants; very low-certainty) and ear pain at the time of injection (13.5%; 1 study; 73 participants; very low-certainty).  3. Intratympanic corticosteroids versus no treatment or placebo as secondary therapy We identified seven studies (279 participants). Intratympanic therapy may have a small effect on the change in hearing threshold (MD -9.07 dB better, 95% CI -11.47 to -6.66; 7 studies; 280 participants; low-certainty). Intratympanic therapy may result in a much higher proportion of participants whose hearing is improved (RR 5.55, 95% CI 2.89 to 10.68; 6 studies; 232 participants; low-certainty). Intratympanic therapy may result in lower (more favourable) final hearing thresholds (MD -11.09 dB, 95% CI -17.46 to -4.72; 5 studies; 203 participants; low-certainty). Some adverse effects only occurred in those who received intratympanic injection. These included persistent tympanic membrane perforation (range 0% to 4.2%; 5 studies; 185 participants; very low-certainty), vertigo or dizziness at the time of injection (range 6.7% to 33%; 3 studies; 128 participants; very low-certainty) and ear pain at the time of injection (0%; 1 study; 44 participants; very low-certainty).  4. Intratympanic plus systemic corticosteroids (combined therapy) versus systemic corticosteroids alone as secondary therapy We identified one study with 76 participants. Change in hearing threshold was not reported. Combined therapy may result in a higher proportion with hearing improvement, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.24, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.55; very low-certainty). Adverse effects were poorly reported with only data for persistent tympanic membrane perforation (rate 8.1%, very low-certainty).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Most of the evidence in this review is low- or very low-certainty, therefore it is likely that further studies may change our conclusions.   For primary therapy, intratympanic corticosteroids may have little or no effect compared with systemic corticosteroids. There may be a slight benefit from combined treatment when compared with systemic treatment alone, but the evidence is uncertain. For secondary therapy, there is low-certainty evidence that intratympanic corticosteroids, when compared to no treatment or placebo, may result in a much higher proportion of participants whose hearing is improved, but may only have a small effect on the change in hearing threshold. It is very uncertain whether there is additional benefit from combined treatment over systemic steroids alone. Although adverse effects were poorly reported, the different risk profiles of intratympanic treatment (including tympanic membrane perforation, pain and dizziness/vertigo) and systemic treatment (for example, blood glucose problems) should be considered when selecting appropriate treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Intratympanic Alpha-Lipoic Acid Injection in a Mouse Model of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is an antioxidant with oto-protective effects. In the present study, the safety and effectiveness of ALA therapy after noise-induced hearing loss was confirmed based on the administration method. The safety of intratympanic ALA (IT-ALA) was evaluated with oto-endoscopy and middle ear mucosa morphologic study. Perilymph ALA concentrations according to the administration routes were compared, and the efficacy of ALA was investigated through hearing tests and cochlear histological studies. The middle ear mucosa was swollen 1 week after IT-ALA but completely recovered within 3 weeks. ALA concentration in the perilymph was significantly higher in the IT-ALA group. Recovery of organ of Corti morphology and hearing levels were predominant in the IT-ALA group compared with the intraperitoneal injection group (IP-ALA) and showed similar rescue effects in the IT-dexamethasone group (IT-DEX). Interleukin-1 beta and nuclear factor-kappa B expression was significantly downregulated in the IT-ALA group. IT-ALA showed better cochlear recovery from acoustic trauma with higher inner ear penetration rate than IP-ALA. The rescue effect of IT-ALA after noise-induced hearing loss was similar to IT-DEX; however, the ALA and DEX mechanisms are different. IT-ALA appears to be another safe and effective treatment modality after acoustic trauma and comparable to IT-DEX.

Intratympanic steroid versus gentamicin for treatment of refractory Meniere's disease: A meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Intratympanic steroid injections (ITSI) have become a promising treatment for refractory Meniere's disease due to less cochleovestibular damage. However, whether ITSI would be a good alternative to intratympanic gentamicin injections (ITGI) for refractory Meniere's disease still remains controversial. Here we intended to compare the therapeutic effect of ITSI and ITGI in patients with Meniere's disease refractory to conservative treatments, in terms of vertigo control and hearing outcomes, via a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Using MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases, we calculated pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates of vertigo control rate (i.e., class A according to AAO-HNS guideline) and standardized mean differences (SMD) of spell count, pure tone audiometry (PTA) threshold and speech discrimination score (SDS) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The trim-and-fill method and sensitivity analysis were used as post-hoc analyses to verify the integrity of the quantitative analysis results. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed according to steroid type (methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone) and follow-up period (>1-year versus <1-year).

RESULTS

Five studies involving 332 patients with refractory unilateral Meniere's disease were included. In the pooled analysis, those treated with ITGI showed higher ORs than those treated with ITSI in terms of vertigo control rate (OR: 2.39, 95% CI: 0.84-6.79, P = 0.102) and spell counts (SMD: 0.24, 95% CI: -0.12-0.59, P = 0.195), but it did not reach statistical significance. However, a substantial amount of heterogeneity (I² = 71.0%, Q = 13.79, P = 0.008) and publication bias was found, suggesting a significant small-study effect. Additionally, ITSI elicited better hearing outcomes of the mean PTA threshold (SMD: 3.08, 95% CI: -1.18-7.35) and mean SDS (SMD: 11.15, 95% CI: -23.21-0.90) compared with ITGI, although no statistical significance. In subgroup analysis, the difference in vertigo control rate between ITGI and ITSI was not significant, regardless of the follow-up period and steroid type. Further, methylprednisolone appeared to be superior to dexamethasone for vertigo control. No significant complications from either treatment were reported in the literature.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study further refine the recently proposed efficacy of ITSI for the treatment of refractory Meniere's disease, demonstrating the comparable value of ITGI on vertigo control as well as better hearing preservation. Collectively, ITSI could be a safe and the effective treatment for refractory Meniere's disease. However, the current evidence on efficacy of ITSI for refractory Meniere's disease needs to be further clarified, given the substantial heterogeneity and potential biases.

Current and Emerging Medical Therapies for Dizziness

Medical therapies for dizziness are aimed at vertigo reduction, secondary symptom management, or the root cause of the pathologic process. Acute peripheral vertigo pharmacotherapies include antihistamines, calcium channel blockers, and benzodiazepines. Prophylactic pharmacotherapies vary between causes. For Meniere disease, betahistine and diuretics remain initial first-line oral options, whereas intratympanic steroids and intratympanic gentamicin are reserved for uncontrolled symptoms. For cerebellar dizziness and oculomotor disorders, 4-aminopyridine may provide benefit. For vestibular migraine, persistent postural perceptual dizziness and mal de débarquement, treatment options overlap and include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants and calcium channel blockers.

Outcomes of transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the MicroWickTM in patients with Ménière's disease: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of a 4-week transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the Silverstein MicroWick^TM in patients with Ménière's disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A self-reported questionnaire was designed and sent to patients who underwent transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the Silverstein MicroWick^TM from January 2017 to December 2020. A retrospective chart review was conducted to gather demographic and audiological data of those who responded.

RESULTS

Forty respondents were separated into Group 1 (n = 34), who required no further procedure, and Group 2 (n = 6), who required additional procedure for Ménière's disease. In Group 1, 50% reported subjective improvement in tinnitus, 59% in aural fullness, 79% in vertigo, and 21% in hearing loss after the MicroWick^TM treatment. A statistical analysis of the scores revealed that the improvement in aural fullness and vertigo met significance (p = 0.03 and p = 0.002, respectively). In Group 2, no significant change was seen in their symptoms. Audiological data showed no significant change in the pure tone average or the word recognition score after the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Transtympanic dexamethasone perfusion using the Silverstein MicroWick^TM is a well-tolerated treatment option for patients with Ménière's disease. Our survey data suggest its significant efficacy in reducing aural fullness and vertigo attacks in these patients. Prospective studies will be conducted to further establish its potential role in successfully managing patients with Ménière's disease.

Efficacy of pharmacologic treatment in tinnitus patients without specific or treatable origin: A network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Although tinnitus has a prevalence between 20 and 42.8%, the currently recommended management for tinnitus, such as tinnitus support and psychologic therapies, are relatively time-consuming and expensive. Several new pharmacologic treatments designed for tinnitus patients without specific origin had been developed but their efficacy remains unclear.

METHODS

The current Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of different pharmacologic treatments for tinnitus management in tinnitus patients without specific or treatable origin (i.e. primary tinnitus). Databases were searched from inception to April 5^th, 2021. All network meta-analytic procedures were conducted under the frequentist model. We calculated the effect size of outcomes with different rating scales with standardized mean difference. PROSPERO registration: CRD42020177742.

FINDINGS

Overall, 36 RCTs were included with 2,761 participants. The main results revealed that pharmacologic interventions with brain-acting effect (for example, amitriptyline, acamprosate, and gabapentin) and those with anti-inflammation/anti-oxidant effect (for example, intra-tympanic dexamethasone injection plus oral melatonin) were associated with superior improvement in tinnitus severity and response rate compared to placebo/control. Oral amitriptyline were associated with the highest improvement in tinnitus severity and the fourth highest response rate. None of the investigated interventions was associated with different changes in quality of life compared to placebo/control. All the investigated treatments were associated with similar drop-out rate to placebo/control.

INTERPRETATION

The current NMA suggests a potential role for treatments with brain-acting effect (for example, amitriptyline, acamprosate, and gabapentin) or anti-inflammation/anti-oxidant effect (for example, intra-tympanic dexamethasone injection plus oral melatonin) as the preferable effective treatments for tinnitus without specific or treatable origin.

FUNDING

none.

Effectiveness of intratympanic dexamethasone for the treatment of vertigo attacks in patients with Ménière's disease compared with betahistine pharmacotherapy

OBJECTIVE

This study analyzed the possible effects of intratympanic steroid (ITS) therapy in the symptomatic treatment of vertigo attacks in patients with Ménière's disease.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients treated with ITS (dexamethasone) plus betahistine (Group A) and 35 patients treated with betahistine alone (Group B) were enrolled in this investigation. Complaints were analyzed using medical records and vertigo diaries. Statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS V24 software.

RESULTS

Based on the analysis, there were no significant differences in baseline features between the two groups. When the occurrence of vertigo attacks was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, no significant difference was detected between Groups A and B (odds ratio [OR] = 1.051, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.965-1.067; p = 0.972). In addition, no difference in the incidence of vertigo attacks was noted in group A between the periods of treatment with betahistine alone and betahistine plus ITS when the groups were analyzed via logistic regression (OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.065-1.467; p = 0.614).

CONCLUSION

It can be concluded that the addition of ITS therapy to betahistine did not improve outcomes in patients with Ménière's disease. Further prospective studies should be conducted to analyze the results in a more detailed manner.

[Hormonal influence on hearing]

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss leads to impairments in communication, social interactions, and cognitive functions. This renders early treatment particularly important. A causal therapy is not yet available. Human and animal studies have shown that certain hormones can have a positive effect on hearing.

OBJECTIVE

This review provides an overview of the effects of various hormones on hearing and describes the potential benefit for future therapeutic approaches.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic literature review of reviews dealing with the effects of various hormones on hearing in humans and animals published in PubMed between 2015 and 2020 was conducted.

RESULTS

Hormones may mediate antiapoptotic effects on structure-relevant cells of the cochlea and auditory pathway, and may influence hair cell functionality or the electrolyte balance of the endo- and perilymph. Current research focuses on glucocorticoids; the mineral corticoid aldosterone; the sex hormones estrogen, progesterone, and testosterone; the growth hormones GH (growth hormone) and IGF‑1 (insulin-like growth factor 1); thyroid hormones; and insulin. Study results are still inconsistent at this time, but various hormones appear to represent a possible future treatment option for acute hearing loss. Long-term hormone treatment, which would be necessary particularly in the case of age-related hearing loss, does not currently represent a sensible course of action due to the side effect profile of the systemic treatment/lack of practicable topical application options.

CONCLUSION

The mode of action of hormones is complex. Whether they can be used in the future for individualized treatment of patients with acute hearing impairment requires further investigation.

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Effectiveness of salvage treatment with low-dose intratympanic dexamethasone

Objectives

To evaluate hearing outcome of salvage treatment with intratympanic steroids (ITS) in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) refractory to initial systemic steroid (SS) therapy.

Material and methods

A retrospective medical chart review was conducted on 54 consecutive patients with ISSNHL refractory to SS. Salvage treatment with a low dose intratympanic dexamethasone (4 mg/ml) was offered after one week of primary treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: 25 patients accepted ITS (treatment group) and 29 patients did not undergo additional treatment (control group). A pure tone average (PTA) gain of at least 10 dB was considered hearing improvement.

Results

Hearing improvement rate was higher in ITS group compared to control group (40% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.035). A mean PTA improvement of 8.6 ± 9.8 dB was observed in the ITS group and, whereas the control group had an average hearing gain of 0.7 ± 2 dB (p < 0.001). Audiometric analysis revealed a significant hearing gain in ITS group at all tested frequencies compared to control group (p < 0.05). Analysis of the selected variables, identified intratympanic steroid treatment as the only independent prognostic factor for hearing improvement (OR = 4.2, 95% CI: 1.1-15.7; p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Intratympanic low dose dexamethasone is effective in patients with incomplete hearing recovery after primary systemic steroid treatment.

Impacts of different methylprednisolone administration routes in patients with sudden hearing loss or Meniere's disease

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests that glucocorticoids are important in the treatment of sudden hearing loss (SHL) and Meniere's disease (MD). However, different glucocorticoid administration methods may have a significant impact on treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate effects of different glucocorticoid administration methods on sudden hearing loss and Meniere's disease.

METHODS

In this study, glucocorticoids were administered orally in 18 patients, by retroauricular injection in 15 patients and by intratympanic injection in 15 patients. White blood cell (WBC) count, serum K+, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body temperature, heart rate and blood pressure were used to evaluate effects of glucocorticoids on patients with hearing loss. Visual analog scale (VAS) of pain and sleep disorders were also surveyed, and pure tone audiometry (PTA) results were compared among groups to evaluate efficacy of different glucocorticoids administration methods.

RESULT

WBC count, heart rate and blood pressure were higher in patients taking oral glucocorticoids, while body temperature, serum K+ and FPG levels did not change in all three groups. However, patients who received intratympanic injection of glucocorticoids experienced more pain, while those taking oral glucocorticoids reported more sleep impairment. Treatment efficacy on hearing loss was not significantly different among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that systemic glucocorticoid administration can result in greater whole body responses than local administration, but with similar hearing treatment efficacy.

Effect of video-assisted information prior to intratympanic steroid injection on patient anxiety

OBJECTIVE

Patients may be afraid when they receive knowledge that medications are injected into the middle ear through the tympanic membrane using a fine needle during intratympanic treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of video-assisted information prior to intratympanic steroid injection on patient anxiety.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, Non-randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center.

METHODS

A total of 85 patients who had an indication for intratympanic treatment due to idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus were included in this prospective study. 40 cases received video-assisted information before intratympanic steroid injection in the study group, while 45 cases were verbally informed face-to-face in the control group. Then, patient anxiety was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

RESULTS

The mean VAS score was 3.58 ± 3.37 (mean rank = 42.09) in the study group and 3.87 ± 3.56 (mean rank = 43.81) in the control group. The mean STAI-S score was 37.03 ± 10.637 in the study group and 39.11 ± 11.783 in the control group. The mean STAI-T score was 40.18 ± 9.151 in the study group and 38.73 ± 11.438 in the control group. It was found that there were no statistically significant differences in the mean VAS, STAI-S and STAI-T scores between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We revealed that video-assisted information prior to intratympanic steroid injection had no superiority in reducing anxiety over face-to-face verbal information.

Current status on researches of Meniere's disease: a review

Background: Meniere's disease (MD) is a complex and multifactorial inner ear disease. The etiology of MD is unclear. Significant progress had been made in diagnosis and treatment. Complete cure for this disease is still impossible.Objectives: This review covers the updated research results in MD in the past decades.Material and methods: Recent publications were critically reviewed.Results: The relationship between Endolymphatic hydrops and Meniere symptoms requires further study. Direct visualization of EH is achieved by special sequences of inner ear MRI. Appearance of EH could be observed in MD patients both in symptomatic and asymptomatic ears. Visualization of EH in vivo might make a great substantial improvement in diagnose of MD. The first goal of the management of MD is to reduce the attack frequency. Several safe and effective medical and surgical therapies are practiced to help patients to control vertigo and preserve hearing.Conclusions and significance: There has been no major breakthrough in the pathogenesis research of MD in recent years. Visualization of EH in vivo might make a great substantial improvement in diagnose of MD. Clinicians still have few effective ways to alleviate the progress of the disease.

Frequency-specific efficacy of intratympanic steroid on idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Background: Hearing recovery would be different in each sound frequency in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL).Aims/objectives: To analyze frequency-specific efficacy of intratympanic steroid on ISSNHL.Materials and methods: Of a total of 381 patients with ISSNHL (hearing threshold ≥40 dB; ≤30 days until treatment), 174 patients (174 ears) received systemic steroid plus hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO group), and 207 patients (208 ears) received systemic plus intratympanic steroid (IT group). Hearing thresholds at 125-8000 Hz were measured at every octave before and after treatment.Results: % of patients with hearing gains ≥10 dB in the IT group was significantly higher for 500 Hz and the average of 5 mid-frequencies, tended to be higher for 1000 Hz, but was significantly lower for 8000 Hz, compared to the HBO group. Multiple regression analysis showed that hearing recovery was negatively correlated with patients' age for 125/2000/4000/8000 Hz and with days from onset to treatment for all frequencies, and also revealed better hearing recovery at 500/1000 Hz in the IT group than in the HBO group.Conclusions: Intratympanic steroid is more effective than hyperbaric oxygen to yield better hearing outcomes at mid-frequencies and would be advantageous to restore sound/speech perception.Significance: Superiority of intratympanic steroid over hyperbaric oxygen for treating ISSNHL was verified.

Light Cupula: To Be Or Not to Be?

Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) represents the most common form of positional vertigo. It is caused by dislodged otoconia that freely float in the semicircular canals (canalolithiasis) or attach to the cupula (cupulolithiasis). A cupulolithiasis-type (or a heavy cupula-type) of BPPV implicating the lateral semicircular canal (LSCC) exhibits persistent ageotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) in a head-roll test. However, in some cases, unlike any type of BPPV, persistent geotropic DCPN cannot be explained by any mechanisms of BPPV, and don't fit the current classifications. Recently, the notion of light cupula has been introduced to refer to the persistent geotropic DCPN. In this study, we looked at the clinical features of light cuplula and discussed the possible mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of the condition. The notion of light cupula is a helpful addition to the theory of peripheral positional vertigo and nystagmus.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Ménière's Disease

OBJECTIVE

Ménière's disease (MD) is a clinical condition defined by spontaneous vertigo attacks (each lasting 20 minutes to 12 hours) with documented low- to midfrequency sensorineural hearing loss in the affected ear before, during, or after one of the episodes of vertigo. It also presents with fluctuating aural symptoms (hearing loss, tinnitus, or ear fullness) in the affected ear. The underlying etiology of MD is not completely clear, yet it has been associated with inner ear fluid (endolymph) volume increases, culminating in episodic ear symptoms (vertigo, fluctuating hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness). Physical examination findings are often unremarkable, and audiometric testing may or may not show low- to midfrequency sensorineural hearing loss. Conventional imaging, if performed, is also typically normal. The goals of MD treatment are to prevent or reduce vertigo severity and frequency; relieve or prevent hearing loss, tinnitus, and aural fullness; and improve quality of life. Treatment approaches to MD are many and typically include modifications of lifestyle factors (eg, diet) and medical, surgical, or a combination of therapies.

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this clinical practice guideline is to improve the quality of the diagnostic workup and treatment outcomes of MD. To achieve this purpose, the goals of this guideline are to use the best available published scientific and/or clinical evidence to enhance diagnostic accuracy and appropriate therapeutic interventions (medical and surgical) while reducing unindicated diagnostic testing and/or imaging.

Intratympanic Steroid for Menière's Disease: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the beneficial effects and safety of intratympanic steroid installation compared with placebo in patients with Menière's disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE and EMBASE for existing systematic reviews and individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were included if they investigated the usage intratympanic steroids in patients aged 18 and above, with definite or probable Menière's disease. The quality of the identified existing reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR tool. The risk of bias in RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and overall quality of the individual outcomes was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method.

RESULTS

The literature search provided four systematic reviews, from which one yielded a sufficient AMSTAR evaluation and subsequently provided three RCTs relevant for inclusion. Due to the lack of sufficient reporting of the data, quantitative synthesis was not applicable. In the qualitative synthesis for the primary outcome, the results from the RCTs showed that there was a slight indication of steroid treatment reducing the frequency of vertiginous attacks. No serious adverse events were reported. Based on the GRADE approach the quality for both findings is very low. No studies reported on the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The effect of intratympanic steroid treatment in Menière's disease is questionable. There is a great need for further research to sufficiently assess whether steroid treatment may be considered as a safe and effective treatment for patients with Menière's disease.

Pharmacotherapy of Tinnitus

Tinnitus is a common symptom for which there is in most cases no causal therapy. The search for an improvement of tinnitus through pharmacological interventions has a long tradition. The observation that tinnitus can be transiently suppressed by the use of lidocaine has shown that the symptom is susceptible to pharmacotherapy. So far, however, no medication has been found for either acute or chronic subjective tinnitus that reliably leads to a long-term reduction or even complete disappearance of the symptom for the majority of tinnitus sufferers. Nevertheless, in everyday clinical life, drugs are frequently used, usually off-label, to relieve tinnitus or tinnitus-associated symptoms (e.g. sleep disturbance, depression, anxiety disorder or hearing loss). This chapter shows the different approaches to acute and chronic subjective tinnitus by means of pharmacotherapeutic interventions. Furthermore, this review reports on the scientific studies carried out in this area in recent years and explains the difficulties in finding a suitable medication for most forms of tinnitus. In addition, it reports on the pharmacotherapeutic options for objective tinnitus and describes the development of tinnitus as a side effect of certain drugs. Finally, possible target structures are mentioned, which should possibly be addressed in pharmacological studies in the near future.

A comparison of endolymphatic shunt surgery and intratympanic gentamicin for meniere's disease

OBJECTIVE

To report audiovestibular outcomes following endolymphatic shunt surgery (ELS) and intratympanic gentamicin injections (ITG) in patients with Meniere's disease (MD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective matched cohort study METHODS: Patients with MD refractory to medical management between 2004 and 2017 were reviewed: 44 patients underwent ELS and had outcomes available, while 27 patients underwent ITG and had outcomes available. Mean follow-up durations for the ELS and ITG groups were 39.1 and 43.3 months, respectively. Twenty-six patients from the ELS group and 24 patients from the ITG group were then included in a pretreatment hearing- and age-matched analysis. Main outcome measures were successful control of vertigo, pure-tone average (PTA; 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz), word recognition score (WRS), and treatment complications.

RESULTS

A matched analysis showed vertigo control rates of 73.1% in the ELS group and 66.8% in the ITG group, which were not significantly different (P = .760). The change in PTA following treatment was statistically similar between the ELS group (6.2 dB) and ITG group (4.6 dB) (P = .521), while the change in WRS for the ELS group (+3.9 %) was significantly more favorable than the ITG group (-13.6 %) (P = .046). Chronic post-treatment unsteadiness was reported in 25.0% of the ITG group and was not encountered in the ELS group (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

ELS provided successful vertigo control at least as well as ITG with a lower incidence of audiovestibular complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:2455-2460, 2020.

Intratympanic infliximab is a safe and effective rescue therapy for refractory immune-mediated hearing loss

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of the intratympanic infiltration of infliximab at the hearing threshold of patients in follow-up for refractory immune-mediated hearing loss.

METHODS

17 patients were collected with relapses, despite maintenance treatment with oral azathioprine associated or not with oral prednisone at low doses (between 5 and 7.5 ml/day) or refractory relapses to previous intratympanic corticoid treatment being 19 affected ears infiltrated. We measured the hearing threshold by Pure-Tone Average (PTA) 500-3000 Hz, 125-8000 Hz and 250-8000 Hz in pre-infiltration (baseline) and follow-up 3 weeks post-infiltration with auditory threshold at frequencies 125-8000 Hz.

RESULTS

The average age was 50.68 years (±15.23 years). After the administration of intratympanic infliximab, an improvement of the hearing threshold was showed in the Pure-Tone Average (PTA) calculated at 500-3000 Hz (p = 0.004), 125-8000 Hz (p = 0.001) and 250-8000 Hz (p = 0.006). An immediate improvement in low frequencies also was observed: 125, 250 and 500 Hz (p = 0.009, p = 0.002 and p < 0.001 respectively) also at 1000 Hz (p = 0.004) and a persistence of the effect at 3 months in the low frequencies: 125 Hz (p = 0.020), 250 Hz (p = 0.006) and 500 Hz (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab intratympanic infiltration improves the hearing threshold in patients with immune-mediated hearing loss. The effect of improving the hearing threshold is higher in low frequencies and persists within 3 months of the infiltration. The administration of intratympanic infliximab is an effective and safe technique.

European Position Statement on Diagnosis, and Treatment of Meniere's Disease

Meniere Disease keeps challenges in its diagnosis and treatment since was defined by Prosper Meniere at the beginning of 19th Century. Several classifications and definition were made until now and speculations still exist on its etiology. As the etiology remains speculative the treatment models remain in discussion also. The European Academy of Otology and Neurotology Vertigo Guidelines Study Group intended to work on the diagnosis and treatment of Meniere's disease and created the European Positional Statement Document also by resuming the consensus studies on it. The new techniques on diagnosis are emphasized as well as the treatment models for each stage of the disease are clarified by disregarding the dilemmas on its treatment. The conservative, noninvasive and invasive therapeutic models are highlighted.

Comparison of the effects of the temperature of intratympanic dexamethasone injections on vertigo

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare if vertigo improved in patients when the dexamethasone used in the intratympanic (IT) injection was applied at body temperature or at room temperature.

METHODS

The study included 54 patients who had undergone intratympanic treatment due to sudden hearing loss and tinnitus. The IT injection was administered to all patients, 2 times with 1-day intervals. Two different IT injection techniques were used for each patient: injecting dexamethasone at room temperature and injecting it at body temperature. Patients were asked to report the vertigo they felt immediately, and at 15 min after the injection using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the four-point categorical rating scale (CRS-4).

RESULTS

The level of vertigo immediately after injection was lower when the dexamethasone was injected at body temperature rather that at room temperature for both the VAS and CRS-4 (p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences in the VAS and CRS-4 self-report values between the two methods were found 15 min after the injection (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Vertigo due to IT decreases within minutes. When the IT drugs are administered at body temperature, temporal vertigo due to injection is lower than when they are administered at room temperature.

Efficacy of Intratympanic Steroid on Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: An Analysis of Cases With Negative Prognostic Factors

Purpose We retrospectively studied the efficacy of intratympanic steroid administration in comparison with hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) with negative prognostic factors. Method We enrolled 301 patients (302 ears) with ISSNHL (average hearing level at 250-4000 Hz ≥ 40 dB; time from onset to treatment ≤ 30 days). From August 2002 to March 2009, 174 patients (174 ears) received systemic steroid plus HBO therapy (HBO group), and from June 2015 to January 2018, 127 patients (128 ears) received systemic plus intratympanic steroid (IT group). Hearing outcomes were evaluated by 6 indices: cure rate, marked-recovery rate (percent of patients with hearing gain ≥ 30 dB), recovery rate (percent of patients with hearing gain ≥ 10 dB), hearing gain, hearing level after treatment, and percent hearing improvement compared to the unaffected contralateral ear. Results The recovery rate was significantly higher in the IT group than in the HBO group (80.5% vs. 68.4%, p = .019). The IT group showed a higher recovery rate than the HBO group in patients aged ≥ 60 years ( p = .010), patients with early (≤ 7 days from onset) treatment ( p = .005), patients with initial hearing levels ≥ 90 dB ( p = .037), and patients with vertigo/dizziness ( p = .040). The IT group also showed higher hearing gain and percent hearing improvement than the HBO group in patients with vertigo/dizziness ( p = .046 and p = .026, respectively). Conclusions Systemic plus intratympanic steroid is more effective for ISSNHL than systemic steroid plus HBO, particularly in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as old age, profound hearing loss, and/or presence of vertigo/dizziness.

Round Window Niche Drilling with Intratympanic Steroid Is a Salvage Therapy of Sudden Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effectiveness and safety of round window niche drilling combined with intratympanic methylprednisolone injection for the salvage treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and its associated tinnitus after failed primary treatment.

METHOD

SSNHL patients who showed a less than 10-dB improvement of pure-tone average after receiving standard systemic treatment and intratympanic steroid injection were enrolled. All included patients were randomly divided into two groups (control and study). Patients in the study group received round window niche drilling combined with daily intratympanic methylprednisolone for 7 times; the control group received only daily intratympanic methylprednisolone for 7 times. One month after treatment, the improvements of PTA, speech discrimination score (SDS), tinnitus and the incidence of adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

20 patients (10 for each group) were included in this study. The baseline between two groups showed no statistical significance. Patients in the study group experienced an average hearing improvement of 20.38 dB, SDS 19.3 compared with 2.1 dB and SDS 2.0 in the control group. None (0%) in the control group and 4 patients (40%) showed marked recovery, 5 patients (50%) showed slight improvement of hearing in the study group after 1 month. All patients in the study group showed significant recovery of tinnitus. Both tinnitus handicap inventory and a symptom visual analogue scale between two groups revealed statistical differences (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, respectively). None in the control and study groups experienced vertigo, infection and facial paralysis.

CONCLUSION

Round window niche drilling increases the contact area and time of methylprednisolone. It is an effective and safe salvage therapy of idiopathic SSNHL and its induced tinnitus.

Therapeutic Approaches to the Treatment of Tinnitus

Tinnitus is a highly prevalent condition that is associated with hearing loss in most cases. In the absence of external stimuli, phantom perceptions of sounds emerge from alterations in neuronal activity within central auditory and nonauditory structures. Pioneering studies using lidocaine revealed that tinnitus is susceptible to pharmacological interventions. However, lidocaine is not effective in all patients, and no other drug has been identified with clear efficacy for the long-term treatment of tinnitus. In this review, we present recent advances in tinnitus research, including more detailed knowledge of its pathophysiology and involved neurotransmitter systems. Moreover, we summarize results from animal and clinical treatment studies as well as from studies that identified tinnitus as a side effect of pharmacological treatments. Finally, we focus on challenges in the development of pharmacological compounds for the treatment of tinnitus, namely the limitations of available animal models and of standardized clinical research methodologies.

Effect of intratympanic steroid injection in light cupula

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of intratympanic steroid injection (ITS) in light cupula.

METHODS

A total of 47 patients showing persistent geotropic direction-changing positional nystagmus with null point (light cupula) were randomly classified into three groups: ITS (n = 15), vestibular suppressant (VS, n = 16) and canalith repositioning procedure (CRP, n = 16). Positional nystagmus and dizziness severity by dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) were conducted before and 3 d and 1 week after first treatment to compare the effect of each treatment.

RESULTS

DHI and VAS scores had decreased after each treatment; however, there were no differences among the three groups. A week after the first treatment, 7, 6 and 7 patients showed resolution of direction-changing positional nystagmus (DCPN) in the ITS, CRP and VS groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the three groups. In the ITS group only, however, reversal of the stronger side on head roll test was observed in 6 patients, and 2 of them showed resolution of DCPN at the third day.

CONCLUSIONS

ITS was not effective for patients with light cupula at 1-week follow-up. However, some patients in the ITS group showed resolution of DCPN at earlier follow-up.

Update on consensus on diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is a sudden, unexplained unilateral hearing loss.

OBJECTIVES

To update the Spanish Consensus on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of ISSNHL.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to March 2018, on MESH terms «(acute or sudden) hearing loss or deafness», a third update was performed, including 1508 relevant papers.

RESULTS

Regarding diagnosis, 11ISSNHL is clinically suspected, the following diagnostic tests are mandatory: otoscopy, acumetry, tonal audiometry, speech audiometry, and tympanometry, to discount conductive causes. After clinical diagnosis has been established, and before treatment is started, a full analysis should be performed. An MRI should then be requested, ideally performed during the first 15 days after diagnosis, to discount specific causes and to help to understand the physiopathological mechanisms in each case. Although treatment is very controversial, due to its effect on quality of life after ISSNHL and the few rare adverse effects associated with short-term steroid treatment, this consensus recommends that all patients should be treated with steroids, orally and/or intratympanically, depending on each patient. In the event of failure of systemic steroids, intratympanic rescue is also recommended. Follow-up should be at day 7, and after 12 months.

CONCLUSION

By consensus, results after treatment should be reported as absolute decibels recovered in pure tonal audiometry and as improvement in speech audiometry.

Intratympanic steroid use for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: current otolaryngology practice in Germany and Austria

AIMS

The frequency of the use of intratympanic steroids (ITS) as a treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) in Europe is still unknown and remains a contentious issue amongst otolaryngologists. We undertook a survey of otolaryngologists in Germany and Austria to establish if there is any professional consensus with which to form a protocol for its use.

METHODS

A survey of 21 questions was distributed electronically to otolaryngologists in Germany and Austria and data on demographics, indications for intratympanic treatment, procedure, follow-up, and outcomes were analysed.

RESULTS

We received 908 responses. 49.1% of otolaryngologists used ITS for ISSNHL. Of those otolaryngologists who use ITS, 73.7% do not use it as primary treatment. 20.6% use ITS in conjunction with oral steroids for primary treatment and only 5.8% use ITS as monotherapy for primary treatment. 90.5% use ITS as salvage therapy. 81.1% do not consider the use of ITS after 2 weeks from the onset of symptoms. 8.3% used a tympanostomy tube and while the most commonly used steroid was dexamethasone at a concentration of 4 mg/ml (61%), a wide variety or other steroids and concentrations were used.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey illustrates wide variation of current practice of intratympanic corticosteroid injection for ISSHL in Germany and Austria. In the absence of high-level evidence, knowing what current practice is allows clinicians to assess what they do against what their colleagues are doing, and if they do something very different, make them question their practice. Moreover, the obtained data will help to direct future clinical trials with the aim to compare the outcomes of more commonly used protocols.