The results of sequential swallowing assessments after total laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies

Toward a robust swallowing detection for an implantable active artificial larynx: a survey

Total laryngectomy consists in the removal of the larynx and is intended as a curative treatment for laryngeal cancer, but it leaves the patient with no possibility to breathe, talk, and swallow normally anymore. A tracheostomy is created to restore breathing through the throat, but the aero-digestive tracts are permanently separated and the air no longer passes through the nasal tracts, which allowed filtration, warming, humidification, olfaction, and acceleration of the air for better tissue oxygenation. As for phonation restoration, various techniques allow the patient to talk again. The main one consists of a tracheo-esophageal valve prosthesis that makes the air passes from the esophagus to the pharynx, and makes the air vibrate to allow speech through articulation. Finally, swallowing is possible through the original tract as it is now isolated from the trachea. Yet, many methods exist to detect and assess a swallowing, but none is intended as a definitive restoration technique of the natural airway, which would permanently close the tracheostomy and avoid its adverse effects. In addition, these methods are non-invasive and lack detection accuracy. The feasibility of an effective early detection of swallowing would allow to further develop an implantable active artificial larynx and therefore restore the aero-digestive tracts. A previous attempt has been made on an artificial larynx implanted in 2012, but no active detection was included and the system was completely mechanic. This led to residues in the airway because of the imperfect sealing of the mechanism. An active swallowing detection coupled with indwelling measurements would thus likely add a significant reliability on such a system as it would allow to actively close an artificial larynx. So, after a brief explanation of the swallowing mechanism, this survey intends to first provide a detailed consideration of the anatomical region involved in swallowing, with a detection perspective. Second, the swallowing mechanism following total laryngectomy surgery is detailed. Third, the current non-invasive swallowing detection technique and their limitations are discussed. Finally, the previous points are explored with regard to the inherent requirements for the feasibility of an effective swallowing detection for an artificial larynx. Graphical Abstract.

Conformity between modified Swallowing Outcome After Laryngectomy questionnaire and Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in laryngeal carcinoma patients after total laryngectomy

BACKGROUND

One of the impacts in anatomic laryngeal and phariyngeal changes after total laryngectomy (TL) is oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD). The detection of neopharyngeal residue as a sign of OPD can be performed by videofluoroscopy (VFS) and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). The availability of these tools in rural areas is still limited, thus the treatment of OPD is not maximal. There is a need for a more practical tool, including the modified swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy (SOAL) questionnaire.

METHODS

This was an analytic observational diagnostic study with a cross-sectional approach. Samples were obtained in Otorhinolaryngology Oncology Clinic and Outpatient Clinic of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, who filled SOAL modified questionnaire followed by FEES. Samples were obtained within 3 months from 10 May to 10 August 2021. The number of samples obtained through simple random sampling was 16 post-TL patients from a total population of 17 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The conformity test between modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES was analyzed using McNemar comparison test and Kappa association test.

RESULTS

McNemar test showed no significant difference between both assessment tools (p > 0.05), and the Kappa test showed an association between both tools (p < 0.05). The results of this study stated that there was conformity between modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES in patients after TL in all types of food bolus had Kappa score of >0.81, showing a reliable association between these tools. Kappa test also showed that out of all three types of boluses, the soft bolus had the highest conformity with a Kappa score of 0.875, followed by thick bolus with 0.839, and watery bolus with 0.818.

CONCLUSION

There was a conformity between the results of the modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES in head and neck surgery patients after TL.