Emergent tracheostomy during the pandemic of COVID-19: Slovenian National Recommendations

Tracheostomy before and during COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to provide insight into the influence of the COVID-19 on the frequency and characteristics of urgent and emergent tracheostomies (TS), comparing data collected both before and during the pandemic. Our two hypotheses were that during COVID-19, more TS were performed in the emergent setting and that during COVID-19 more TS were performed under general anaesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The research was retrospective. The study period included the two years before and after the COVID-19 outbreak in Slovenia. Forty-one patients in each period met the inclusion criteria. Their medical charts were reviewed. The anamnestic, clinical, surgical and anaesthesiological data were collected. The two groups of patients from corresponding time periods were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Predominantly men required the surgical resolution of acute upper airway obstruction (76% of patients). The causes for acute respiratory distress included head and neck cancer (62%), infections (20%), vocal cord paralysis (16%), and stenosis (2%). There were no statistically significant differences either in the (emergent/urgent) setting of TS or in the type of anaesthesia used. Both hypotheses were rejected. A statistically significant rise in use of the C-MAC laryngoscope during COVID-19 (from 3% to 15%) was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The outbreak of COVID-19 did not have a statistically significant effect on the frequency of performing emergent and urgent tracheostomies nor on the use of general or local anaesthesia. It did, however, require a change of intubation technique. Consequently, a significant rise in the use of the C-MAC laryngoscope was noted.

Emergency Tracheostomy: Complications, Anesthetic Techniques, and Outcomes

Objectives: Acute upper airway obstruction is a critical medical condition that presents considerable challenges to anesthesiologists. This study aims to provide a formal report on the incidence and outcomes of perioperative complications, as well as the factors that influence unstable intraoperative hemodynamics. Methods: This retrospective study reviewed patients aged 18 years and older who underwent emergency tracheostomy between January 2013 and October 2021. Data on perioperative complications and outcomes within the first 24 hours and 7 days after surgery were subjected to analysis. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were used to examine the results. Results: A total of 253 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 61.5 ± 12.9 years. Malignancy was detected in 78.3% of the patients. General anesthesia was administered to 43.9% of the patients. The incidence of intraoperative complications was 51.8%, with hypotension and hypertension occurring in 30.4% and 22.5% of the cases, respectively. Desaturation and cardiac arrest were observed in 4.7% and 0.8% of the patients, respectively. The mortality rate at 7 days after surgery was 1.6%. Multivariate analysis revealed that monitored anesthesia care [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-3.00] and hypertensive patients (adjusted OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 1.01-2.86) were associated with unstable intraoperative hemodynamics. Conclusions: Cardiovascular instability represented the majority of the complications observed. Monitoring anesthesia care and hypertension were significant prognostic factors for unstable intraoperative hemodynamics. We recommend extensive communication between ear, nose, and throat surgeons and anesthesiologists to determine the appropriate choice of anesthesia.

Bilateral vocal cords paralysis requiring urgent tracheostomy on COVID-19 patient: a case report

Background

SARS-CoV-2 infection has many manifestations, including otolaryngological symptoms.

Case presentation

A 60-year-old man with severe dyspnea underwent endotracheal intubation followed by 68 h of mechanical ventilation. After extubation, he left the ICU without any significant complications. Four days after the extubation, he developed dyspnea, which deteriorated the next 2 days, and stridor became evident. A fiberoptic laryngoscope revealed bilateral vocal cord edema and paralysis, which required an emergency airway. We decided to perform an awake tracheostomy under local anesthesia while considering protection for airborne infection to healthcare providers. The tracheostomy was closed when the edema and paralysis of the vocal cords were ameliorated.

Conclusions

A COVID-19 patient who underwent injurious ventilation developed vocal cord paralysis and edema 6 days after extubation, leading to an emergency tracheostomy. Close attention to the upper airway of COVID-19 patients is essential since the pathophysiology of the present incident may be specific to the viral infection.

Elective open "Shield Tracheostomy" in patients with COVID-19

Purpose

To prevent the consequences of long-term endotracheal intubation, patients undergo tracheostomies. However, as COVID-19 is highly contagious, its existence has made the tracheostomy a high-risk procedure. Tracheostomy procedures must, therefore, be adjusted for safety reasons. The aim is to present the adjustments that should be made to the surgical technique.

Methods

Both the medical charts and surgical reports of patients with COVID-19 who were subjected to elective open tracheostomies were reviewed.

Results

The retrospective study included 25 patients. Our adjustments include the timing of tracheostomies, ideally putting them at 21 days after the onset of COVID-19, the advancement of an endotracheal tube to 26–28 cm from the upper-alveolar ridge, surgery being carried out in the intensive care unit with appropriately modified positions of the patient and providers, tracheo-cutaneous sutures, and intentionally making the small tracheal flap and the tracheal window the same shape as a medieval shield.

Conclusions

A tracheostomy performed in this way is now referred to as the Shield Tracheostomy. Further improvements to the surgical technique are expected in the future.

Current Recommendations for Airway Management Techniques in COVID-19 Patients without Respiratory Failure Undergoing General Anaesthesia: A Nonsystematic Literature Review

Summary Background

Since severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) first emerged, many articles have been published on airway management for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, there is a lack of clear and concise conceptual framework for working with infected patients without respiratory failure undergoing general anaesthesia compared to noninfected patients. The aim of this article is to review current literature data on new challenges for anaesthesia providers, compare standard airway management techniques protocols with new data, and discuss optimisation potential.

Materials and methods

Literature search was performed in Google Scholar and PubMed databases using these keywords and their combinations: anaesthesia, preoxygenation, airway management, difficult airway, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19. The following nonsystematic review is based on a comprehensive literature search of available data, wherein 41 articles were chosen for detailed analysis. Summarised and analysed data are presented in the article.

Results

SARS-CoV-2 has unique implications for airway management techniques in patients without respiratory failure undergoing general anesthesia. Main differences with the standard practice include: institutional preparedness, team composition principles, necessary skills, equipment, drugs, intubation and extubation strategies. Failed or difficult intubation is managed with predominance of emergency front of neck access (FONA) due to increased aerosol generation.

Conclusions

Airway management techniques in COVID-19 patients without respiratory failure are more challenging than in noninfected patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Safe, accurate and swift actions avoid unnecessary time delay ensuring the best care for patients, and reduce risk of contamination for staff. Appropriate airway strategy, communication, minimisation of time for aerosol generating procedures and ramped-up position aid to achieve these goals. During the pandemic, updated available literature data may change clinical practice as new evidence emerges.

The COVID TIDE Approach: A Protocol for Safe Tracheostomy Practice in COVID Patients

We all are aware of COVID 19 pandemic. As the numbers are increasing, the critical care demand is also increasing. Tracheostomy is one of the commonest procedures which has been performed on COVID positive ventilated patients. It is important to understand and follow the utmost safe practices for the patient and the health care workers for such aerosol generating procedures. The aim of this study is to identify the lacunae in tracheostomy practices during this COVID times and suggest a systematic approach for the safe practices. An online questionnaire survey-based study was performed in September 2020. The target population was practicing otolaryngologists of India with various years of experience. The aim of the study was to evaluate the lacunae in tracheostomy safe practices and to create a systematic approach for the safety of health care workers. Data compilation and analysis was done by using Microsoft Excel. A systematic COVID TIDE tracheostomy safe practices approach was designed after reviewing various tracheostomy guidelines and recommendations. Total 114 otolaryngologists responded with a complete survey report. 72.2% responders were not up to date with their knowledge of tracheostomy safe practices. 79.8% were not performing this procedure in a negative pressure room. 15.8% were not aware of the personal protective equipment level they are using. Only 56.1% survey responders were holding the ventilation before tracheal incision. Overall, 94.7% responders were keen to know about the safe approach of tracheostomy in COVID positive patients. Tracheostomy is an aerosol generating procedure, lacunae in the knowledge can cause major risk to health care professionals. Finally, in such crises, consideration should be taken for simulation exercises, dedicated airway teams and a systematic COVID TIDE approach to improve the safety of the staff and patients.