Regional disease in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: the role of primary tumor characteristics and number of nodal metastases

Surgical Management of Patients with Parotid Involvement from Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer of the Head and Neck

We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal study on a single-center series of patients who underwent parotidectomy in the management of advanced head and neck non-melanoma skin cancer (hnNMSC). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with worse outcomes. Forty-one men and nine women were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 78.9 years. The 5-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival calculated with Kaplan-Meier curves were 39.9%, 56.3%, 58.6%, and 82.1%, respectively. A univariate analysis showed that the status of the margins, facial nerve direct involvement, lymph vascular invasion, and histological grading were associated with worse outcomes (p < 0.05). Positive margins were associated with worse disease-specific survival also in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.001, HR = 32.02, and CIs 4.338 to 351.3). Because the resection in free margins is the most important prognostic factor, early diagnosis or, in the case of advanced disease, extensive surgical resection with concomitant reconstruction is needed. Adjuvant therapy is indicated in selected cases.

Metastatic patterns and treatment options for head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (Review)

According to current predictions, one-fifth of all Americans will develop skin cancer during their lifetime. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) most commonly occurs in the head and neck region, which is the area of the body with the highest level of sun exposure. High-risk head and neck cSCC (HNcSCC) is a broad category with numerous high-risk factors that are associated with unfavorable results. In cSCC staging systems, clinical and tumor traits that are likely to result in poor outcomes are identified. Metastasis occurs in ~2.5% of patients with cSCC, most often in the local lymph nodes, and there is some indication that lymph node metastasis has a distinct pattern based on the tumor site. Current findings on tumor molecular targets have suggested the use of systemic treatments, particularly immunotherapy (such as cemiplimab, pembrolizumab and nivolumab), over radiotherapy or chemotherapy for this type of metastasis. However, when used simultaneously with immunotherapy, radiotherapy may be beneficial in the treatment of metastatic HNcSCC by improving the efficacy of immunotherapy. The present review aims to assess the existing literature on metastatic HNcSCC pathways and treatment options, in order to define current and future directions. Notably, there is an urgent need to identify patients who may benefit from local or systemic cancer treatments. The treatment of lymph node metastasis presents a therapeutic challenge and requires comprehensive management.

Lymph node metastasis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the impact of parotid lymph nodes (LNs) on the prognosis of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck (HNcSCC), and to develop an alternative LN assessment method to enhance locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) stratification.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with surgically treated HNcSCC. Primary outcome variables were LRC and OS. The influence of parotid LNs and different LN assessment methods on prognosis was analyzed using Cox models, and comparisons were made using the C-index, Akaike Information Criterion, and Bayesian Information Criterion.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included. Both intraparotid and periparotid LN statuses significantly linked with prognosis. The presence of extranodal extension (ENE) in cervical LNs, rather than parotid LNs, was predictive of decreased LRC and OS. In the Cox analysis, only N3 of the AJCC N classification, when compared to N0, showed reduced LRC and OS. In comparison to N0P1, only N0P3/N1P1 and N2P2/N2P3 of the O'Brien staging system tended to predict poorer LRC, with no subgroup emerging as an independent predictor for OS. The proposed LN assessment method, based on the number of metastatic LNs and ENE status in cervical LNs, demonstrated superior performance in terms of C-index, Akaike Information Criterion, and Bayesian Information Criterion compared to other systems.

CONCLUSION

Parotid LNs were significant determinants of prognosis in metastatic HNcSCC. The novel LN assessment method proposed (1-2 vs. 3-4 vs. 5 + or ENE) displayed similar survival stratification to the AJCC N and O'Brien staging systems.

Head and neck nonmelanoma skin cancers: surgical management and debated issues

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review critically assesses the current literature and guidelines, aiming to clarify some of the most important factors that impact surgical strategies of head and neck nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs), focusing on squamous, basal, and Merkel cell carcinomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments underscore the complexity of treatment for NMSC, particularly in the head and neck region. There is a lack of high-level evidence for the management of these tumors, especially in advanced stages. The need to tailor the extent of surgical margins and parotid/neck management to different histotypes, considering the varying risk factors for recurrence, is beginning to emerge in the literature. Moreover, the role of immunotherapy and targeted therapies for locally advanced disease, alongside traditional treatment options, is progressively growing.

SUMMARY

NMSCs represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies with varying treatment complexities and prognoses. Management of NMSC is evolving towards an increasingly personalized strategy within a multidisciplinary therapeutic framework.

Neck management in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Objective

Optimal neck management remains unclear in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) with parotid metastasis. Our goal was to compare the impact of different cervical treatments on HNcSCC with parotid metastasis.

Methods

Patients were retrospectively included. The primary outcome variables were regional control (RC) and disease-specific survival (DSS). The impacts of observation, elective neck irradiation (ENI), and elective neck dissection (END) were analyzed using the Cox model and presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

In total, 268 patients were enrolled. In the Cox model for RC, compared with ENI, observation was associated with a significantly higher risk of regional recurrence (p = 0.001, HR = 2.50, 95%CI = 1.45-4.30). However, END showed a comparable influence on regional recurrence (p = 0.246, HR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.38-1.28). In the Cox model for DSS, END demonstrated a similar HR of 0.62 (95%CI = 0.30-1.26) compared to ENI (p = 0.184). However, patients who underwent observation were associated with an additional nearly twofold risk of cancer-related mortality (HR = 2.85, 95%CI = 1.55-5.23). Subgroup analysis showed that ENI predicted comparable RC (p = 0.389) and DSS (p = 0.346) in patients with one or two metastatic parotid lymph nodes, but worse RC (p = 0.007) and DSS (p = 0.024) in patients with more than three positive lymph nodes.

Conclusion

In HNcSCC with parotid metastasis, elective treatment of neck lymph nodes with END or ENI should always be performed.

Surgical factors affecting regionally metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid gland

BACKGROUND

Understanding the impact of surgical treatment on regionally metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC).

METHODS

Retrospective series of 145 patients undergoing parotidectomy and neck dissection for regionally metastatic cSCC to the parotid. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and disease-free survival (DFS) analyzed over 3 years. Multivariate analysis was completed using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

OS was 74.5%, DSS was 85.5% and DFS was 64.8%. On multivariate analysis, immune status (HR = 3.225[OS], 5.119[DSS], 2.071[DFS]) and lymphovascular invasion (HR = 2.380[OS], 5.237[DSS], 2.595[DFS]) were predictive for OS, DSS, and DFS. Margin status (HR = 2.296[OS], 2.499[DSS]) and ≥18 resected nodes (HR = 0.242[OS], 0.255[DSS]) were predictive of OS and DSS, while adjuvant therapy was predictive of DSS (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression and lymphovascular invasion portended worse outcomes in patients with metastatic cSCC to the parotid. Microscopically positive margins and <18 nodes resected are associated with worse OS and DSS, while patients receiving adjuvant therapy had improved DSS.

Risk Factors for Poor Survival Outcomes in Parotid Metastatic Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze risk factors associated with poor survival outcomes for metastatic cutaneous head-and-neck SCC to the parotid.

METHODS

All patients undergoing surgery for metastatic cutaneous SCC to the parotid with curative intent between 2011 and 2018, were reviewed. Demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Histopathological data including tumor size and histology, tumor grade, TNM stage, resection margins, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion, were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), and freedom from locoregional recurrence (LRR) were assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were included (mean age, 77 years; 75 men [83.3%]). A total parotidectomy was performed in 48 patients (53.3%), and 42 (46.7%) underwent a superficial parotidectomy. Seventy patients (77.8%) underwent adjuvant RT. The median follow-up was 31 months (20-39 months). Tumor volume ≥ 50 cm³ and a shorter RT duration (<20 days) were associated with reduced OS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.01, p = 0.02 and p = 0.009, respectively), and DSS (p = 0.004 and p = 0.02, p = 0.04 and p = 0.02, respectively) on univariable and multivariable analysis, respectively. Only a shorter RT duration was associated with worse freedom from LRR on univariable and multivariable analysis, (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, with death as a competing risk, a shorter duration of RT was not significantly associated with freedom from LRR.

CONCLUSION

A shorter duration of adjuvant RT, and excised tumor volume ≥50 cm³ were predictive factors of reduced OS and DSS, and a shorter duration of RT was also associated with reduced freedom from LRR in patients with metastatic SCC to the parotid gland.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 Laryngoscope, 2022.

The Effect of Tumor Characteristics and Location on the Extent of Lymph Node Metastases of Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background

The extent of a neck dissection for patients with metastasis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNcSCC) is still subject to debate and clear guidelines are lacking. Tumor characteristics like size, differentiation and tumor location are known risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM). There is some evidence that, depending on tumor location, LNM follows a specific pattern. This study aims to identify which tumor characteristics can predict the pattern and extent of LNM.

Method

In this cohort study 80 patients were included, who underwent a primary neck dissection for LNM of HNcSCC between 2003 and 2018 at the University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands. Retrospective data was collected for primary tumor characteristics and LNM and included surgical and follow-up data. Influence of tumor characteristics on the extent of LNM was analyzed using non-parametric tests. Logistic regression analysis were used to identify a metastasis pattern based on the primary tumor location.

Results

Only primary tumor location was associated with the pattern of LNM. HNcSCC of the ear metastasized to level II (OR = 2.6) and the parotid gland (OR = 3.6). Cutaneous lip carcinoma metastasized to ipsilateral and contralateral level I (OR = 5.3). Posterior scalp tumors showed a metastasis pattern to level II (OR = 5.6); level III (OR = 11.2), level IV (OR = 4.7) and the parotid gland (OR = 10.8). Ear canal tumors showed a low risk of LNM for all levels. The extent of LNM was not related to age or any tumor characteristics i.e. tumor diameter, infiltration depth, differentiation grade, perineural growth and vascular invasion.

Conclusion

Primary tumor location determines the LNM pattern. Whereas known unfavorable tumor characteristics did not relate to the extent of LNM. Location guided limited neck dissection combined with parotidectomy will treat most patients adequately.