Screening for Myositis Antibodies in Idiopathic Interstitial Lung Disease

Identification of connective tissue disease autoantibodies and a novel autoantibody anti-annexin A11 in patients with "idiopathic" interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Autoantibodies are a hallmark feature of Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD). Their presence in patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease (ILD) may suggest covert CTD. We aimed to determine the prevalence of CTD autoantibodies in patients diagnosed with idiopathic ILD.

METHODS

499 patient sera were analysed: 251 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 206 idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP) and 42 cryptogenic organising pneumonia (COP). Autoantibody status was determined by immunoprecipitation.

RESULTS

2.4% of IPF sera had a CTD-autoantibody compared to 10.2% of iNSIP and 7.3% of COP. 45% of autoantibodies were anti-synthetases. A novel autoantibody targeting an unknown 56 kDa protein was found in seven IPF patients (2.8%) and two NSIP (1%) patients. This was characterised as anti-annexin A11.

CONCLUSION

Specific guidance on autoantibody testing and interpretation in patients with ILD could improve diagnostic accuracy. Further work is required to determine the clinical significance of anti-annexin A11.

Presenting clinical and imaging features of patients with clinically amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies

Background

Lung involvement in the context of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies has significant impact on outcome; early and accurate diagnosis is important but can be difficult to achieve. In particular, patients without clinically evident muscle involvement pose a significant diagnostic challenge.

Methods

A computer-assisted search was conducted to identify patients with amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with the presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies. Medical records and chest imaging studies were reviewed to identify clinical and radiologic features at presentation.

Results

Of the 35 patients with amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies, the median age was 65 years (range 43-78) and 20 were women (57%). Of the patients, 34% had previously visited the rheumatology department. Presenting symptoms consisted of dyspnea (94%), cough (43%), and arthritis (23%). Raynaud phenomenon, "mechanic hands," Gottron papules, and inspiratory crackles were present in 23, 31, 9, and 74% of patients, respectively. After a detailed history, none of the patients reported muscle weakness, while four (11%) exhibited increased CK levels; of these four, two had a concomitant increase in aldolase levels. Median FVC was 79% predicted (range: 49-135) and median DLco was 50% predicted (range: 17-103). HRCT pattern was suggestive of an alternative to UIP pattern in 31/33 (94%) patients; the most common imaging patterns were NSIP (49%) and NSIP/OP (39%).

Conclusion

In patients with NSIP and NSIP/OP pattern, the presence of amyopathic interstitial lung disease associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies should be considered even in the absence of clinical evident myositis.

External validation of the 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathies in a Mexican cohort: Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and classification of patients with inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to perform the first external validation of the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for inflammatory myopathy (IIM) in a Mexican dynamic cohort where the patients were evaluated with clinical and laboratory values. As secondary objectives, we presented the clinical characteristics of the patients and included antibodies other than anti Jo1 to evaluate their impact on our population.

METHODOLOGY

This study included 70 patients with IIM and 70 patients with differential diagnoses of IIM, according to the absolute score of the classification criteria. We obtained sensitivity and specificity in the modality without biopsy, and as an exploratory analysis, we added other antibodies from the myositis extended panel. We analyzed the area under the curve (AUC) of three models: score without antibodies, with anti Jo1 and with any antibody.

RESULTS

The ACR/EULAR criteria showed increased specificity and at least similar sensitivity to that of the original cohort (85% sensitivity and 92% specificity), with a cohort point of >55%. When we classified patients into definite, probable, possible, and no IIM categories, by adding the extended myopathy panel, 6 of the 10 patients initially classified as "no IIM" changed their classification to "Probable IIM" and 4 to "Definite IIM"; of the 16 patients classified as "probable IIM," 15 changed their classification to "Definite IIM."

CONCLUSION

Considering the limitations of this study, we concluded that the 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria for IIM classification are sensitive and specific for classifying patients with IIM in the Mexican population. Additionally, the addition of antibodies other than anti-Jo1 may improve performance in certain populations.

Prevalence and clinical associations of myositis antibodies in a large cohort of interstitial lung diseases

Background

Serologic testing for autoantibodies is recommended in interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), as connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are an important secondary cause. Myositis antibodies are associated with CTD-ILD, but clinical associations with other ILDs are unclear. In this study, associations of myositis antibodies in various ILDs were evaluated.

Methods

1463 ILD patients and 116 healthy subjects were screened for myositis antibodies with a line-blot assay on serum available at time of diagnosis. Additionally, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALf) was analysed.

Results

A total of 394 patients demonstrated reactivity to at least one antibody, including anti-Ro52 (36.0%), anti-Mi-2β (17.3%) and anti-Jo-1 (10.9%). Anti-Jo-1 (OR 6.4; p<0.100) and anti-Ro52 (OR 6.0; p<0.001) were associated with CTD-ILD. Interestingly, anti-Mi-2β was associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF; OR 5.3; p = 0.001) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP; OR 5.9; p<0.001). Furthermore, anti-Mi-2β was strongly associated with a histological usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern (OR 6.5; p < 0.001). Moreover, anti-Mi-2β reactivity was identified in BALf and correlated with serum anti-Mi-2β (r = 0.64; p = 0.002). No differences were found in survival rates between ILD patients with and without serum Mi-2β reactivity (hazard ratio 0.835; 95% CI 0.442–1.575; p = 0.577).

Conclusion

In conclusion, novel associations of antibody Mi-2β with fibrotic ILD were found. Furthermore, serum anti-Mi-2β was associated with a histological UIP pattern and presence of anti-Mi-2β in BALf. Possibly, anti-Mi-2β could be implemented as a future diagnostic biomarker for fibrotic ILD.

Myositis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Clinical Characteristics and Factors Related to Pulmonary Function Improvement: A Latin-American Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ILD patients can be positive to highly specific autoantibodies of connective tissue diseases (CTD). Among them stand out myositis-specific and associated autoantibodies (MSA/MAA). There is limited knowledge about treatment response and prognosis of ILD patients positive to MSA/MAA (MSA/MAA-ILD). Our aim was to describe clinical, radiological and pulmonary function (PF) of MSA/MAA-ILD Latin-American patients and risk factors associated to PF at onset and long term follow up.

METHODS

Multicentric retrospective study of MSA/MAA-ILD patients evaluated between 2016 and 2018 in 3 ILD clinics in Latin America. Clinical, functional and tomographic variables were described. Variables associated with poor baseline PF and associated with functional improvement (FI) were analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

We included 211 patients, 77.4% female, mean age 57 years old. Most frequent MSA/MAA were Ro-52 and Jo-1. Poor baseline PF was associated to ILD as initial diagnosis and NSIP/OP HRCT pattern. 121 patients were included in the follow up PF analysis: 48.8% remained stable and 33% had a significant FI. In multivariate analysis, OP pattern on HRCT was associated with FI. Systemic symptoms from the beginning and the absence of sclerodactyly showed a trend to be associated with FI.

CONCLUSIONS

Worse baseline PF could be related to the absence of extra-thoracic symptoms and "classic" antibodies in CTD (ANA), which causes delay in diagnosis and treatment. In contrast, FI could be related to the presence of extra-thoracic signs that allow timely diagnosis and therapy, and more acute and subacute forms of ILD, such as OP pattern.

Phenotypic clusters and survival analyses in interstitial pneumonia with myositis-specific autoantibodies

Background:

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) is highly combined with interstitial pneumonia (IP), often as the initial or solo presentation with positive myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) but does not fulfill the diagnostic criteria.

Objectives:

We aimed to explore the phenotypic clusters and prognosis of the patients with IP and positive MSA, which is called MSA-IP in the present study.

Methods:

A total of 178 patients with MSA-IP were prospectively enrolled for analysis. Serum MSAs were detected using Western blotting. Radiological patterns of IP were determined according to the classification of idiopathic IPs. Clusters of patients with MSA-IP were identified using cluster analysis. Predictors for acute/subacute onset, therapeutic response, IP progression and survival were also analyzed.

Results:

Patients with MSA-IP were classified into four distinct clusters. Cluster 1 were the elderly with chronic onset, nearly normal oxygenation and good survival. Cluster 2 had dyspnea on exertion and nonspecific IP pattern, with moderate survival. Patients in cluster 3 had chronic onset and were prone to IP progression (OR 2.885). Cluster 4 had multi-systemic involvements, positive anti-melanoma differentiation associated gene 5 antibody, and were prone to acute/subacute onset (OR 3.538) and IP progression (OR 5.472), with poor survival. Corticosteroids combined immunosuppressants showed therapeutic response in MSA-IP (OR 4.303) and had a protective effect on IP progression (OR 0.136).

Conclusions:

Four clusters of the patients with MSA-IP suggested the distinct clinical, radiological and prognostic features.

Myositis Antibodies and Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a heterogeneous group of inflammatory and fibrotic conditions, often resulting in progressive lung function decline and increased mortality. Connective tissue disease (CTD) should be considered in all patients with ILD, as distinguishing between CTD-ILD and other forms of fibrotic lung disease has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) represent a CTD subtype of growing interest to ILD experts. The expansion and availability of myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibody testing has allowed for improved disease detection and characterization.

CONTENT

In this review, we highlight the relationship between myositis antibodies and ILD. Select forms of IIM, such as the antisynthetase syndrome and clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis can present with rapidly progressive ILD, warranting timely disease diagnosis and management. Disease phenotypes, prevalence, laboratory testing, prognosis, and management strategies are described according to select myositis antibodies.

SUMMARY

Myositis antibodies provide valuable information for clinicians managing patients with ILD. This review aims to increase awareness of their role in disease detection, pathophysiology, and possibly therapeutics.

Anti-tRNA synthetase syndrome interstitial lung disease: A single center experience

BACKGROUND

Recognition of Anti-tRNA synthetase (ARS) related interstitial lung disease (ILD) is key to ensuring patients have prompt access to immunosuppressive therapies. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to identify factors that may delay recognition of ARS-ILD.

METHODS

Patients seen at Vanderbilt University Medical Center between 9/17/2017-10/31/2018 were included in this observational cohort. Clinical and laboratory features were obtained via chart abstraction. Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U, and Fisher's exact t tests were utilized to determine statistical significance.

RESULTS

Patients with ARS were found to have ILD in 51.9% of cases, which was comparable to the frequency of ILD in systemic sclerosis (59.5%). The severity of FVC reduction in ARS (53.2%) was comparable to diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (56.8%, p = 0.48) and greater than dermatomyositis (66.9%, p = 0.005) or limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis (71.8%, p = 0.005). Frank honeycombing was seen with ARS antibodies but not other myositis autoantibodies. ARS patients were more likely to first present to a pulmonary provider in a tertiary care setting (53.6%), likely due to fewer extrapulmonary manifestations. Only 33% of ARS-ILD were anti-nuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide positive. Patients with ARS-ILD had a two-fold longer median time to diagnosis compared to other myositis-ILD patients (11.0 months, IQR 8.5-43 months vs. 5.0 months, IQR 3.0-9.0 months, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

ARS patients without prominent extra-pulmonary manifestations are at high risk for not being recognized as having a connective tissue disease related ILD and miscategorized as usual interstitial pneumonia/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis without comprehensive serologies.

Baseline Characteristics and Survival of an Australian Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features Cohort

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The research term "interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features" (IPAF) encompasses interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients with autoimmune features not meeting diagnostic criteria for a defined connective tissue disease (CTD). It remains unclear if IPAF is a distinct disease entity with implications for management and prognosis. We describe an Australian IPAF population and compare their baseline characteristics and outcomes with distinct cohorts of idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP), CTD-ILD, and unclassifiable ILD.

METHODS

Review of 291 consecutive patients attending a specialist ILD clinic was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of IIP, CTD-ILD, and unclassifiable ILD by ILD-multidisciplinary meeting (ILD-MDM) were included. Patients meeting the IPAF criteria were identified. Baseline clinical data, survival, and progression were compared between ILD groups.

RESULTS

226 patients were included, 36 meeting the IPAF criteria. IPAF patients demonstrated a high prevalence of autoantibodies to tRNA synthetase (35.3%), Ro52 (27.8%), and neutrophilic cytoplasmic antigens (ANCA; 20.0%). IPAF and CTD-ILD patients demonstrated similar clinical characteristics (mean age 66.6 and 63.7 years, respectively, female predominant, frequent CTD-manifestations). Lung function did not differ between ILD groups. Disease severity, pulmonary hypertension (PH), and ILD-MDM diagnosis were strong predictors of worse transplant-free survival (TFS). Meeting the IPAF criteria was not associated with TFS.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified IPAF as a heterogeneous phenotype that overlaps considerably with CTD-ILD. Disease severity, PH, and ILD-MDM diagnosis were more powerful predictors of survival outcomes than meeting the IPAF criteria.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The different types of pulmonary fibrosis are a subgroup of the interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). They are associated with a chronic and often progressive course.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in the EMBASE and PubMed databases, with an emphasis on articles published from 2000 to 2020.

RESULTS

The most common type of pulmonary fibrosis is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Among other relevant types, the most important ones are fibrosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) and ILDs associated with systemic diseases, all of which are rare and generally carry a poor prognosis. The essential prerequisite to accurate diagnosis is aninterdisciplinary approach, taking account of the clinical, histological, and radiological aspects. The main complications of pulmonary fibrosis are acute exacerbations and pulmonary hypertension; comorbidities are also of prognostic relevance. Treatment of pulmonary fibrosis depends on the subtype and clinical behavior. For IPF, antifibrotic therapy is indicated; fHP, on the other hand, is mainly treated by antigen avoidance and immune modulation. The predominant mode of treatment for systemic disease-associated pulmonary fibrosis is immune suppression. Antifibrotic agents can also be useful in the treatment of other types of progressivepulmonary fibrosis besides IPF.

CONCLUSION

The differential diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis, though complex, is clinically essential, as different types of pulmonary fibrosis are treated differently.

Real world utilization of the myositis autoantibody panel

OBJECTIVE

Myositis autoantibody panel results can offer diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with concern for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). However, there has been widespread utilization of myositis autoantibody testing clinically, often in situations where concern for an IIM is unclear. We sought to determine ordering practices and factors predicting positive results on ordered myositis antibody panels.

METHODS

We included all patients in the Duke University Health System who had a "myositis antibody panel" ordered from October 2014 through December 2016. Retrospective chart review was performed evaluating antibody positivity, provider specialty, ordering location, demographics, medical history, review of systems (ROS), physical examination (PE), and laboratory values. Fisher's exact and t test tests and backward multivariable regression analysis were performed for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 642 unique tests obtained with 114 positive autoantibodies (17.7%) over the 26-month period. Myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) were the most common and anti-Mi-2 was the most frequent (40% of MSAs). Pulmonology providers ordered the majority of tests (383; 59.6%). Adult Rheumatology had the highest antibody positivity rate (34.3%, p=0.0001) among specialties with at least 10 panels ordered. In backward multivariable regression analysis, factors independently associated with a positive myositis antibody panel were chronic corticosteroid use (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.30-3.38) and sclerodermoid skin changes (OR: 6.89; 95% CI: 2.02-23.47).

CONCLUSION

The positivity rate of myositis antibody panel testing in this real-world clinical setting was 18%. Anti-Mi-2 antibody was the most frequent autoantibody present. Specific factors associated with positive results can be utilized to identify patients at higher risk for IIM.

KEY POINTS

• Only eighteen percent of all myositis antibody panel tests ordered returned positive. • Anti-Mi-2 antibody was the most frequent autoantibody in our cohort. • Specific factors associated with positive results can help identify patients at higher risk for IIM, particularly for non-rheumatologists.

Myositis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Clinical Characteristics and Factors Related to Pulmonary Function Improvement: A Latin-American Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

ILD patients can be positive to highly specific autoantibodies of connective tissue diseases (CTD). Among them stand out myositis-specific and associated autoantibodies (MSA/MAA). There is limited knowledge about treatment response and prognosis of ILD patients positive to MSA/MAA (MSA/MAA-ILD). Our aim was to describe clinical, radiological and pulmonary function (PF) of MSA/MAA-ILD Latin-American patients and risk factors associated to PF at onset and long term follow up.

METHODS

Multicentric retrospective study of MSA/MAA-ILD patients evaluated between 2016 and 2018 in 3 ILD clinics in Latin America. Clinical, functional and tomographic variables were described. Variables associated with poor baseline PF and associated with functional improvement (FI) were analyzed in a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

We included 211 patients, 77.4% female, mean age 57 years old. Most frequent MSA/MAA were Ro-52 and Jo-1. Poor baseline PF was associated to ILD as initial diagnosis and NSIP/OP HRCT pattern. 121 patients were included in the follow up PF analysis: 48.8% remained stable and 33% had a significant FI. In multivariate analysis, OP pattern on HRCT was associated with FI. Systemic symptoms from the beginning and the absence of sclerodactyly showed a trend to be associated with FI.

CONCLUSIONS

Worse baseline PF could be related to the absence of extra-thoracic symptoms and "classic" antibodies in CTD (ANA), which causes delay in diagnosis and treatment. In contrast, FI could be related to the presence of extra-thoracic signs that allow timely diagnosis and therapy, and more acute and subacute forms of ILD, such as OP pattern.

Prevalence of Novel Myositis Autoantibodies in a Large Cohort of Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease

Connective tissue diseases (CTDs) are an important secondary cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD). If a CTD is suspected, clinicians are recommended to perform autoantibody testing, including for myositis autoantibodies. In this study, the prevalence and clinical associations of novel myositis autoantibodies in ILD are presented. A total of 1194 patients with ILD and 116 healthy subjects were tested for antibodies specific for Ks, Ha, Zoα, and cN1A with a line-blot assay on serum available at the time of diagnosis. Autoantibodies were demonstrated in 63 (5.3%) patients and one (0.9%) healthy control (p = 0.035). Autoantibodies were found more frequently in females (p = 0.042) and patients without a histological and/or radiological usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP; p = 0.010) and a trend towards CTD-ILDs (8.4%) was seen compared with other ILDs (4.9%; p = 0.090). The prevalence of antibodies specific for Ks, Ha, Zoα, and cN1A was, respectively, 1.3%, 2.0%, 1.4%, and 0.9% in ILD. Anti-Ha and Anti-Ks were observed in males with unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (unclassifiable IIP), hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and various CTD-ILDs, whereas anti-cN1A was seen in females with antisynthetase syndrome (ASS), HP, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Anti-Zoα was associated with CTD-ILD (OR 2.5; 95%CI 1.11-5.61; p = 0.027). In conclusion, a relatively high prevalence of previously unknown myositis autoantibodies was found in a large cohort of various ILDs. Our results contribute to the awareness that circulating autoantibodies can be found in ILDs with or without established CTD. Whether these antibodies have to be added to the standard set of autoantibodies analysed in conventional myositis blot assays for diagnostic purposes in clinical ILD care requires further study.