The radiation adaptive response and priming dose influence: the quantification of the Raper-Yonezawa effect and its three-parameter model for postradiation DNA lesions and mutations

Biomarker dosimetry of acute low level of thermal neutrons and radiation adaptive response effect on rats

In this paper, we demonstrated the biological effects of acute low-dose neutrons on the whole body of rats and investigated the impact of that level of neutron dose to induce an in vivo radio-adaptive response. To understand the radio-adaptive response, the examined animals were exposed to acute neutron radiation doses of 5 and 10 mSv, followed by a 50 mSv challenge dose after 14 days. After irradiation, all groups receiving single and double doses were kept in cages for one day before sampling. The electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) method was used to estimate the radiation-induced radicals in the blood, and some hematological parameters and lipid peroxidation (MDA) were determined. A comet assay was performed beside some of the antioxidant enzymes [catalase enzyme (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione (GSH)]. Seven groups of adult male rats were classified according to their dose of neutron exposure. Measurements of all studied markers are taken one week after harvesting, except for hematological markers, within 2 h. The results indicated lower production of antioxidant enzymes (CAT by 1.18-5.83%, SOD by 1.47-17.8%, and GSH by 11.3-82.1%). Additionally, there was an increase in red cell distribution width (RDW) (from 4.61 to 25.19%) and in comet assay parameters such as Tail Length, (from 6.16 to 10.81 µm), Tail Moment, (from 1.17 to 2.46 µm), and percentage of DNA in tail length (DNA%) (from 9.58 to 17.32%) in all groups exposed to acute doses of radiation ranging from 5 to 50 mSv, respectively. This emphasizes the ascending harmful effect with the increased acute thermal neutron doses. The values of the introduced factor of radio adaptive response for all markers under study reveal that the lower priming dose promotes a higher adaptation response and vice versa. Ultimately, the results indicate significant variations in DNA%, SOD enzyme levels, EPR intensity, total Hb concentration, and RDWs, suggesting their potential use as biomarkers for acute thermal neutron dosimetry. Further research is necessary to validate these measurements as biodosimetry for radiation exposure, including investigations involving the response impact of RAR with varied challenge doses and post-irradiation behavior.

A Revised System of Radiological Protection Is Needed

ABSTRACT

The system of radiological protection has been based on linear no-threshold theory and related dose-response models for health detriment (in part related to cancer induction) by ionizing radiation exposure for almost 70 y. The indicated system unintentionally promotes radiation phobia, which has harmed many in relationship to the Fukushima nuclear accident evacuations and led to some abortions following the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Linear no-threshold model users (mainly epidemiologists) imply that they can reliably assess the cancer excess relative risk (likely none) associated with tens or hundreds of nanogray (nGy) radiation doses to an organ (e.g., bone marrow); for 1,000 nGy, the excess relative risk is 1,000 times larger than that for 1 nGy. They are currently permitted this unscientific view (ignoring evolution-related natural defenses) because of the misinforming procedures used in data analyses of which many radiation experts are not aware. One such procedure is the intentional and unscientific vanishing of the excess relative risk uncertainty as radiation dose decreases toward assigned dose zero (for natural background radiation exposure). The main focus of this forum article is on correcting the serious error of discarding risk uncertainty and the impact of the correction. The result is that the last defense of the current system of radiological protection relying on linear no-threshold theory (i.e., epidemiologic studies implied findings of harm from very low doses) goes away. A revised system is therefore needed.

Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation on the Human Body

Radioactivity is a process in which the nuclei of unstable atoms spontaneously decay, producing other nuclei and releasing energy in the form of ionizing radiation in the form of alpha (α) and beta (β) particles as well as the emission of gamma (γ) electromagnetic waves. People may be exposed to radiation in various forms, as casualties of nuclear accidents, workers in power plants, or while working and using different radiation sources in medicine and health care. Acute radiation syndrome (ARS) occurs in subjects exposed to a very high dose of radiation in a very short period of time. Each form of radiation has a unique pathophysiological effect. Unfortunately, higher organisms-human beings-in the course of evolution have not acquired receptors for the direct "capture" of radiation energy, which is transferred at the level of DNA, cells, tissues, and organs. Radiation in biological systems depends on the amount of absorbed energy and its spatial distribution, particularly depending on the linear energy transfer (LET). Photon radiation with low LET leads to homogeneous energy deposition in the entire tissue volume. On the other hand, radiation with a high LET produces a fast Bragg peak, which generates a low input dose, whereby the penetration depth into the tissue increases with the radiation energy. The consequences are mutations, apoptosis, the development of cancer, and cell death. The most sensitive cells are those that divide intensively-bone marrow cells, digestive tract cells, reproductive cells, and skin cells. The health care system and the public should raise awareness of the consequences of ionizing radiation. Therefore, our aim is to identify the consequences of ARS taking into account radiation damage to the respiratory system, nervous system, hematopoietic system, gastrointestinal tract, and skin.

Interplay of immune modulation, adaptive response and hormesis: Suggestive of threshold for clinical manifestation of effects of ionizing radiation at low doses?

The health impacts of low-dose ionizing radiation exposures have been a subject of debate over the last three to four decades. While there has been enough evidence of "no adverse observable" health effects at low doses and low dose rates, the hypothesis of "Linear No Threshold" continues to rule and govern the principles of radiation protection and the formulation of regulations and public policies. In adopting this conservative approach, the role of the biological processes underway in the human body is kept at abeyance. This review consolidates the available studies that discuss all related biological pathways and repair mechanisms that inhibit the progression of deleterious effects at low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation. It is pertinent that, taking cognizance of these processes, there is a need to have a relook at policies of radiation protection, which as of now are too stringent, leading to undue economic losses and negative public perception about radiation.

Persons chronically exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation: A cytogenetic dosimetry study

The dosimetry and control of exposure for individuals chronically exposed to ionizing radiation are important and complex issues. Assessment may be optimized by evaluating individual adaptation and radiosensitivity, but it is not possible for a single model to account for all relevant parameters. Our goal was to develop approaches for the calculation of doses for persons chronically exposed to ionizing radiation, taking their radiosensitivities into consideration. On the basis of ex vivo radiation of blood samples, dose-effect models were constructed for dose ranges 0.01-2.0 and 0.01-0.4 Gy, using different cytogenetic criteria. The frequencies of "dicentric chromosomes and rings" at low doses are too low to have predictive value. The different responses of subjects to radiation made it possible to categorize them according to their radiosensitivities and to generate separate dose-effect curves for radiosensitive, average, and radioresistant individuals, reducing the amount of error in retrospective dosimetry.

Diagnostic low-dose X-ray radiation induces fluoroquinolone resistance in pathogenic bacteria

PURPOSE

The crisis of antibiotic resistance has been attributed to the overuse or misuse of these medications. However, exposure of bacteria to physical stresses such as X-ray radiation, can also lead to the development of resistance to antibiotics. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of exposure to diagnostic low-dose X-ray radiation on the bacterial response to antibiotics in two pathogenic bacteria, including the Gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative Salmonella enteritidis.

METHODS

The bacterial strains were exposed to diagnostic X-ray doses of 5 and 10 mGy, which are equivalent to the doses delivered to patients during conventional radiography X-ray examinations in accordance with the European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. Following exposure to X-ray radiation, the samples were used to estimate bacterial growth dynamics and perform antibiotic susceptibility tests.

RESULTS

The results indicate that exposure to diagnostic low-dose X-ray radiation increased the number of viable bacterial colonies of both Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella enteritidis and caused a significant change in bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. For instance, in Staphylococcus aureus, the diameter of the inhibition zones for marbofloxacin decreased from 29.66 mm before irradiation to 7 mm after irradiation. A significant decrease in the inhibition zone was also observed for penicillin. In the case of Salmonella enteritidis, the diameter of the inhibition zone for marbofloxacin was 29 mm in unexposed bacteria but decreased to 15.66 mm after exposure to 10 mGy of X-ray radiation. Furthermore, a significant decrease in the inhibition zone was detected for amoxicillin and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC).

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that exposure to diagnostic X-ray radiation can significantly alter bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. This irradiation decreased the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone and β-lactam antibiotics. Specifically, low-dose X-rays made Staphylococcus aureus resistant to marbofloxacin and increased its resistance to penicillin. Similarly, Salmonella Enteritidis became resistant to both marbofloxacin and enrofloxacin, and showed reduced sensitivity to amoxicillin and AMC.

The Radiation-Specific Components Generated in the Second Step of Sequential Reactions Have a Mountain-Shaped Function

A mathematical model for radiation hormesis below 100 mSv has previously been reported, but the origins of the formula used in the previous report were not provided. In the present paper, we first considered a sequential reaction model with identical rate constants. We showed that the function of components produced in the second step of this model agreed well with the previously reported function. Furthermore, in a general sequential reaction model with different rate constants, it was mathematically proved that the function representing the component produced in the second step is always mountain-shaped: the graph has a peak with one inflection point on either side, and such a component may induce radiation hormesis.

Adaptive Response in Rat Retinal Cell Cultures Irradiated with γ-rays

Retina can receive incidental γ-ray exposure from various sources. For example, although radiation therapy is a crucial tool for managing head and neck tumors, patients may develop ocular complications as collateral damage from accidental irradiation. Recently, there has been concern that retinal irradiation during space flight may compromise mission goals and long-term quality of life after space travel. Previously, in our in vitro model, we proved that immature retinal cells are more vulnerable to γ-radiation than differentiated neurons. Here, we investigate if a low-dose pre-irradiation (0.025 Gy), known to have a protective effect in various contexts, can affect DNA damage and oxidative stress in cells exposed to a high dose of γ-rays (2 Gy). Our results reveal that pre-irradiation reduces 2 Gy effects in apoptotic cell number, H2AX phosphorylation and oxidative stress. These defensive effects are also evident in glial cells (reduction in GFAP and ED1 levels) and antioxidant enzymes (catalase and CuZnSOD). Overall, our results confirm that rat retinal cultures can be an exciting tool to study γ-irradiation toxic effects on retinal tissue and speculate that low irradiation may enhance the skill of retinal cells to reduce damage induced by higher doses.

Biophysical Modeling of the Ionizing Radiation Influence on Cells Using the Stochastic (Monte Carlo) and Deterministic (Analytical) Approaches

This review article describes our simplified biophysical model for the response of a group of cells to ionizing radiation. The model, which is a product of 10 years of studies, acts as (a) a comprehensive stochastic approach based on the Monte Carlo simulation with a probability tree and (b) the thereof derived detailed deterministic models describing the selected biophysical and radiobiological phenomena in an analytical manner. Specifically, the presented model describes effects such as the risk of neoplastic transformation of cells relative to the absorbed radiation dose, the dynamics of tumor development, the priming dose effect (also called the Raper–Yonezawa effect) based on the introduced adaptive response approach, and the bystander effect. The model is also modifiable depending on users’ potential needs.