Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome presenting as aseptic meningitis

Drug-induced meningitis: A review of the literature and comparison with an historical cohort of viral meningitis cases

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced aseptic meningitis (DIAM) is potentially insufficiently considered by clinician, being of rare etiology, with there being no previously published exhaustive study describing its clinical and biological features.

METHODS

Two independent academic clinicians searched all the case reports of DIAM from 1995 until 15^th April, 2017. The search was limited to studies performed in humans, published in English or French. Clinical and biological data of subjects were compared with those of patients with documented viral meningitis.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-one case reports fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the commonest drug cause of AM n=49, followed by antibiotics n=46, biotherapy n=19 and finally immunomodulators n=15. The clinical and biological presentation of DIAM varies according to the causative etiological drug, especially with respect to the interval between exposure and presentation and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleiocytosis. Clinical symptoms associated with meningitis were more prevalent in viral meningitis than in DIAM, except for fever and signs of encephalitis. Cerebrospinal fluid examination in DIAM reveals an increased CSF white cell count and an increased proportion of neutrophils and protein, compared with viral meningitis.

DISCUSSION

We present an extensive review of the DIAM case reports, and highlight their clinical and biological characteristics according to the drugs involved. While comparing for the first time their characteristics with those of viral meningitis, this review hopes in facilitate earlier diagnosis and management of DIAM in clinical practice.

Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole-Induced Aseptic Meningitis: A Rare Presentation of Commonly Used Antibiotic

Drug-induced aseptic meningitis is a rare medical condition with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole being one of the most common antimicrobial agents associated with it. Here, I report a case of a 56-year-old male who presented to a health care facility with shock and meningitis-like syndrome in two occasions, one year apart following an exposure to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of skin/soft tissue infection. Investigations did not reveal an infectious etiology in the two presentations. The patient improved with supportive care and withdrawal of the offending agent. In the two admissions, the patient improved following stopping the offending drug in addition to supportive care. The diagnosis of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced aseptic meningitis was the most likely explanation for this case. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-induced aseptic meningitis is rare although it is a life-threatening side effect of TMP/SMX; therefore, the clinicians should keep the diagnosis of drug-induced aseptic meningitis in the differential diagnosis of aseptic meningitis in the appropriate clinical setting as early withdrawal of the culprit drug and supportive measurements will lead to early recovery.

A Rare Case of Levetiracetam and Drug-Induced Idiopathic Aseptic Meningitis in a Pediatric Patient

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a pyrrolidine derivative antiepileptic medication used for the treatment of seizures in pediatric and adult patients. We report a case of probable LEV-induced aseptic meningitis in a 13-year-old girl. The patient received LEV for a generalized seizure disorder and presented with symptoms 5 days after medication initiation. Ten days after LEV initiation, the patient presented to the hospital for further management. During her hospital course, infectious etiologies were ruled out with clinical and diagnostic testing. Upon discontinuation of LEV, the patient's symptoms resolved. Although select antiepileptic medications have been associated with drug-induced aseptic meningitis (DIAM), to date, no reports have been published about DIAM following the administration of LEV. We describe and categorize the probability of DIAM in association with LEV, as observed in a patient case.

Lamotrigine induced DIHS/DRESS: Manifestations, treatment, and outcome in 57 patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical features, course, response to treatment, and outcome of lamotrigine induced drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS) or drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS).

METHODS

A comprehensive PubMed and Scopus search (covering the period from January 1999 through April 2014) of the English and non-English literature (with English abstract) was conducted to identify published reports of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) associated with lamotrigine therapy.

RESULTS

This study population included 57 patients, of whom 38 (66.67%) were female and 19 (33.33%) were male. The latency period varied from 9 days to 120 days, with a mean of 27.58 ± 20.65 days. Multisystem involvement was present in 97.37% (37/38) patients. Systemic corticosteroids were administered to (61.29%) 19/31 patients. 35/38 (92.11%) patients recovered completely, one patient developed liver failure and needed liver transplant, one died from septic shock and one died from multiple organ failure.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a greater predominance of women with LTG-DIHS/DRESS, and 68.42% patients were >18 years of age. The presenting symptoms in most of patients were fever, skin rash, liver involvement, hypereosinophilia, and lymphadenopathy. Lamotrigine is associated to a rather high risk of severe cutaneous adverse reactions and to the risk of dying from such reactions, likes many other anticonvulsants. Early recognition and withdrawal of the suspected agent may avoid irreversible damage to the organs will be life saving.

The DRESS syndrome: a literature review

The Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptom (DRESS) is a severe adverse drug-induced reaction. Diagnosing DRESS is challenging due to the diversity of cutaneous eruption and organs involved. We used the RegiSCAR scoring system that grades DRESS cases as "no," "possible," "probable," or "definite" to classify cases reported in the literature. We also analyzed the clinical course and treatments of the cases. A total of 44 drugs were associated with the 172 cases reported between January 1997 and May 2009 in PubMed and MEDLINE. The most frequently reported drug was carbamazepine, and the vast majority of cases were classified as "probable/definite" DRESS cases. Hypereosinophilia, liver involvement, fever, and lymphadenopathy were significantly associated with "probable/definite" DRESS cases, whereas skin rash was described in almost all of the cases, including "possible cases." Culprit drug withdrawal and corticosteroids constituted the mainstay of DRESS treatment. The outcome was death in 9 cases. However, no predictive factors for serious cases were found. This better knowledge of DRESS may contribute to improve the diagnosis and management of this syndrome in clinical practice.