De-escalation from natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: recurrence of disease activity despite switching to glatiramer acetate

MS treatment de-escalation: review and commentary

Almost all currently licensed disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS treatment require prolonged if not lifelong administration. Yet, as people age, the immune system has increasingly reduced responsiveness, known as immunosenescence. Many MS DMTs reduce the responsiveness of the immune system, increasing the risks for infections and possibly cancers. As people with MS (pwMS) age, it is recognized that inflammatory MS activity declines. Several studies have addressed de-escalation of DMTs for relapsing MS under special circumstances. Here, we review evidence for de-escalating DMTs as a strategy that is particularly relevant to pwMS of older age. Treatment de-escalation can involve various strategies, such as extended or reduced dosing, switching from high-efficacy DMTs having higher risks to moderately effective DMTs with lesser risks, or treatment discontinuation. Studies have suggested that for natalizumab extended dosing maintained clinical efficacy while reducing the risk of PML. Extended interval dosing of ocrelizumab mitigated the decline of Ig levels. Retrospective and observational discontinuation studies demonstrate that age is an essential modifier of drug efficacy. Discontinuation of MS treatment in older patients has been associated with a stable disease course, while younger patients who discontinued treatment were more likely to experience new clinical activity. A recently completed 2-year randomized-controlled discontinuation study in 260 stable pwMS > 55 years found stable clinical multiple sclerosis with only a small increased risk of new MRI activity upon discontinuation. DMT de-escalation or discontinuation in MS patients older than 55 years may be non-inferior to continued treatment with immunosuppressive agents having higher health risks. However, despite several small studies, a definite conclusion about treatment de-escalation in older pwMS will require larger and longer studies. Ideally, comparison of de-escalation versus continuation versus discontinuation of DMTs should be done by prospective randomized-controlled trials enrolling sufficient numbers of subjects to allow comparisons for MS patients of both sexes within age groups, such as 55-59, 60-65, 66-69, etc. Optimally, such studies should be 3 years or longer and should incorporate testing for specific markers of immunosenescence (such as T-cell receptor excision circles) to account for differential aging of individuals.

Multiple faces of multiple sclerosis in the era of highly efficient treatment modalities: Lymphopenia and switching treatment options challenges daily practice

The expanded treatment landscape in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) has resulted in highly effective treatment options and complexity in managing disease- or drug-related events during disease progression. Proper decision-making requires thorough knowledge of the immunobiology of MS itself and an understanding of the main principles behind the mechanisms that lead to secondary autoimmunity affecting organs other than the central nervous system as well as opportunistic infections. The immune system is highly adapted to both environmental and disease-modifying agents. Immune reconstitution following cell depletion or cell entrapment therapies eliminates pathogenic aspects of the disease but can also lead to distorted immune responses with harmful effects. Atypical relapses occur with second-line treatments or after their discontinuation and require appropriate clinical decisions. Lymphopenia is a result of the mechanism of action of many drugs used to treat MS. However, persistent lymphopenia and cell-specific lymphopenia could result in disease exacerbation, secondary autoimmunity, or the emergence of opportunistic infections. Clinicians treating patients with MS should be aware of the multiple faces of MS under novel, efficient treatment modalities and understand the intricate brain-immune cell interactions in the context of an altered immune system. MS relapses and disease progression still occur despite the current treatment modalities and are mediated either by failure to control effector mechanisms inherent to MS pathophysiology or by new drug-related mechanisms. The multiple faces of MS due to the highly adapted immune system of patients impose the need for appropriate switching therapies that safeguard disease remission and further clinical improvement.

PML risk is the main factor driving the choice of discontinuing natalizumab in a large multiple sclerosis population: results from an Italian multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab (NTZ) is an effective treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, patients and physicians may consider discontinuing NTZ therapy due to safety or efficacy issues. The aim of our study was to evaluate the NTZ discontinuation rate and reasons of discontinuation in a large Italian population of RRMS patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data were extracted from the Italian MS registry in May 2018 and were collected from 51,845 patients in 69 Italian multiple sclerosis centers. MS patients with at least one NTZ infusion in the period between June 1st 2012 to May 15th 2018 were included. Discontinuation rates at each time point were calculated. Reasons for NTZ discontinuation were classified as "lack of efficacy", "progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) risk" or "other".

RESULTS

Out of 51,845, 5151 patients, 3019 (58.6%) females, with a mean age of 43.6 ± 10.1 years (median 40), were analyzed. Out of 2037 (39.5%) who discontinued NTZ, a significantly higher percentage suspended NTZ because of PML risk compared to lack of efficacy [1682 (32.7% of 5151) vs 221 (4.3%), p < 0.001]; other reasons were identified for 99 (1.9%) patients. Patients discontinuing treatment were older, had longer disease duration and worse EDSS at the time of NTZ initiation and at last follow-up on NTZ treatment. The JCV index and EDSS at baseline were predictors for stopping therapy (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.22-4.75; p = 0.02; HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.18-5.41; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Roughly 60% of MS patients stayed on NTZ treatment during the observation period. For those patients in whom NTZ discontinuation was required, it was mainly due to PML concerns.

Natalizumab Pharmacokinetics and -Dynamics and Serum Neurofilament in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Natalizumab (NAT) is a high-efficacy treatment for relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, it is associated with an increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy that sometimes requires treatment cessation with a risk of returning disease activity. The aim of this study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics and -dynamics as well as neurodestruction marker serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) in patients with RRMS and secondary progressive MS (SPMS) stopping NAT in correlation to clinical data. Methods: In this study, 50 RRMS and 9 SPMS patients after NAT cessation were included. Five RRMS patients on NAT treatment holiday were evaluated. Clinical and radiological disease activity were systemically assessed by frequent exams after NAT stop. Free NAT concentration, cell bound NAT, α4-integrin expression and α4-integrin-receptor saturation as well as immune cell frequencies were measured for up to 4 months after NAT withdrawal. Additionally, sNfL levels were observed up to 12 months in RRMS and up to 4 months in SPMS patients. Results: NAT cessation was associated with a return of disease activity in 38% of the RRMS and 33% of the SPMS patients within 12 and 7 months, respectively. Concentration of free and cell bound NAT as well as α4-integrin-receptor saturation decreased in the RRMS and SPMS patients whereas α4-integrin expression increased over time. NAT induced increase of lymphocytes and its subsets normalized and a non-significant drop of NK and Th17 T-cells counts could be detected. All RRMS patients showed physiological sNfL levels <8pg/ml 1 month after last NAT infusion. During follow-up period sNfL levels peaked up to 16-fold and were linked to return of disease activity in 19 of the 37 RRMS patients. Treatment holiday was also associated with a return of disease activity in 4 of 5 patients and with an increase of sNfL at an individual level. Conclusions: We demonstrate the reversibility of NAT pharmacodynamic and -kinetic markers. sNfL levels are associated with the recurrence of disease activity and can also serve as an early marker to predict present before onset of clinical or radiological disease activity on the individual level.

Switching treatments in clinically stable relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients planning for pregnancy

Background

The decision to have children can be complex, particularly for people with multiple sclerosis (MS). A key concern is the use of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) during pregnancy, and how continuing, stopping or switching them may affect the mother and child. In people with active MS, stopping medications puts the mother at risk of relapse and disease rebound.

Objectives

Review evidence on the effect of different switching strategies in people with stable relapsing remitting MS (RRMS).

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library up to March 2020. Only papers in English were included and no other limits were applied. Seven articles were included: four cohorts, two case reports and one randomized controlled trial (RCT).

Results

Two strategies were found: de-escalating, which was associated with an increased risk of relapses, and switching between first line injectables, with no change in relapse rate observed.

Conclusion

Evidence on the effect of switching strategy on disease course in stable RRMS patients planning for pregnancy is scarce, but when switching, current evidence suggests the risk of relapses mirrors known medication efficacy.

Effect of switching from natalizumab to moderate- vs high-efficacy DMT in clinical practice

Objective

To assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of switching from natalizumab (NTZ) to a moderate-efficacy (Mod) disease-modifying therapy (DMT) vs high-efficacy therapy (HET) in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

Patients discontinuing NTZ at two MS centers (n = 556) who switched to Mod DMT (n = 270) vs HET (n = 130) were assessed using propensity score (PS) weighting. PS model covariates included demographics and baseline clinical and MRI characteristics. All outcomes were reported as Mod DMT vs HET.

Results

Of the patients included in the study, 48.6% switched to Mod DMT (dimethyl fumarate, n = 130; fingolimod, n = 140) vs 23.4% who switched to HET (ocrelizumab, n = 106; rituximab, n = 17; alemtuzumab, n = 7). Within the first 6 months post-NTZ, switchers to Mod DMT experienced comparable relapses (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.72-1.66], p = 0.724), although they had increased MRI activity on treatment (OR = 2.59, 95% CI [1.09-3.57], p = 0.037). By 24 months post-NTZ, there was no difference in the annualized relapse rate (OR = 1.44, 95% CI [0.69-1.59], p = 0.334) or time to first clinical relapse (HR = 2.12, 95% CI [0.87-5.17], p = 0.090), although switchers to Mod DMT had higher gadolinium-enhancing (GdE) lesions (OR = 3.62, 95% CI [1.56-5.21], p = 0.005), earlier time to first GdE lesion (HR = 6.67, 95% CI [2.06-9.16], p = 0.002), lower proportion with the absence of disease activity (OR = 0.41, 95% CI [0.21-0.71], p = 0.004), and higher risk of disability progression on T25FW (OR = 1.83, 95% CI [1.06-3.02], p = 0.043) and 9-HPT (OR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.05-3.56], p = 0.044).

Conclusion

Patients switching from NTZ to Mod DMT vs HET were at relatively increased risk of disease activity within the first 6 months of NTZ withdrawal that was sustained at 24 months, yielding greater disability progression.

Patient perspective on decisions to switch disease-modifying treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

There are now large cohorts of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS) who have taken several Disease-Modifying Treatments (DMTs). Studies about switching DMTs mostly focus on clinical outcomes rather than patients' decision-making. Neurologists are now required to support decisions at various times during the relapsing disease course and they do so with concerns about DMTs risks. This qualitative study investigates how pwRRMS weigh up the pros and cons of DMTs, focusing on perceptions of effectiveness and risks when new treatments are considered.

OBJECTIVE

To increase understanding of people's experiences of decision-making when switching DMTs.

METHODS

30 semi-structured interviews were conducted with pwRRMS in England. 16 participants had switched DMT and their experiences were compared with those who had only taken one DMT. Interviews were analysed thematically to answer: what main factors influence people's decision-making to switch DMTs and why?

RESULTS

Of the 16 participants with experience of switching DMT, eight had taken two or more DMTs; eight had taken three or more. Two was the DMT median. This study demonstrated that despite the term "switching" implying that similar treatments are inter-changeable, for pwRRMS taking new treatments involves different emotions, routines, risks, prognosis and communication experiences. Two meta themes identified were: 1) A distinctive, rapid and emotional decision-making process where old emotions related to MS prognosis are revisited. 2) Switching has a different impact on communication for escalation or de-escalation processes.

CONCLUSION

Switching DMT involves different routines, risks, prognosis and communication experiences. These decisions are emotionally difficult because of the fear about transitioning to secondary progressive MS, and DMT effectiveness uncertainty. Patient centred decision aids should include information about first and consecutive treatment decisions.

Treatment Optimization in Multiple Sclerosis: Canadian MS Working Group Recommendations

The Canadian Multiple Sclerosis Working Group has updated its treatment optimization recommendations (TORs) on the optimal use of disease-modifying therapies for patients with all forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Recommendations provide guidance on initiating effective treatment early in the course of disease, monitoring response to therapy, and modifying or switching therapies to optimize disease control. The current TORs also address the treatment of pediatric MS, progressive MS and the identification and treatment of aggressive forms of the disease. Newer therapies offer improved efficacy, but also have potential safety concerns that must be adequately balanced, notably when treatment sequencing is considered. There are added discussions regarding the management of pregnancy, the future potential of biomarkers and consideration as to when it may be prudent to stop therapy. These TORs are meant to be used and interpreted by all neurologists with a special interest in the management of MS.

Risk factors for reactivation of clinical disease activity in multiple sclerosis after natalizumab cessation

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab (NTZ) is widely used for highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Inflammatory disease activity often returns after NTZ treatment discontinuation. We aimed to identify predictive factors for such reactivation in a real-life setting.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective survey in four Finnish hospitals. A computer-based search was used to identify all patients who had received NTZ for multiple sclerosis. Patients were included if they had received at least six NTZ infusions, had discontinued treatment for at least three months, and follow-up data was available for at least 12 months after discontinuation. Altogether 89 patients were analyzed with Cox regression model to identify risk factors for reactivation, defined as having a corticosteroid-treated relapse.

RESULTS

At 6 and 12 months after discontinuation of NTZ, a relapse was documented in 27.0% and 35.6% of patients, whereas corticosteroid-treated relapses were documented in 20.2% and 30.3% of patients, respectively. A higher number of relapses during the year prior to the introduction of NTZ was associated with a significantly higher risk for reactivation at 6 months (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.65, p < 0.001) and at 12 months (HR 1.53, p < 0.001). Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 5.5 or higher before NTZ initiation was associated with a higher reactivation risk at 6 months (HR 3.70, p = 0.020). Subsequent disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) failed to prevent reactivation of MS in this cohort. However, when subsequent DMDs were used, a washout time longer than 3 months was associated with a higher reactivation risk at 6 months regardless of whether patients were switched to first-line (HR 7.69, p = 0.019) or second-line therapies (HR 3.94, p = 0.035). Gender, age, time since diagnosis, and the number of NTZ infusions were not associated with an increased risk for reactivation.

CONCLUSION

High disease activity and a high level of disability prior to NTZ treatment seem to predict disease reactivation after treatment cessation. When switching to subsequent DMDs, the washout time should not exceed 3 months. However, subsequent DMDs failed to prevent the reactivation of MS in this cohort.

Immunological Aspects of Approved MS Therapeutics

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common neurological immune-mediated disease leading to disability in young adults. The outcome of the disease is unpredictable, and over time, neurological disabilities accumulate. Interferon beta-1b was the first drug to be approved in the 1990s for relapsing-remitting MS to modulate the course of the disease. Over the past two decades, the treatment landscape has changed tremendously. Currently, more than a dozen drugs representing 1 substances with different mechanisms of action have been approved (interferon beta preparations, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, siponimod, mitoxantrone, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, cladribine, alemtuzumab, ocrelizumab, and natalizumab). Ocrelizumab was the first medication to be approved for primary progressive MS. The objective of this review is to present the modes of action of these drugs and their effects on the immunopathogenesis of MS. Each agent's clinical development and potential side effects are discussed.

Post-natalizumab disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Natalizumab (NTZ) is sometimes discontinued in patients with multiple sclerosis, mainly due to concerns about the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. However, NTZ interruption may result in recrudescence of disease activity.

Objective

The objective of this study was to summarize the available evidence about NTZ discontinuation and to identify which patients will experience post-NTZ disease reactivation through meta-analysis of existing literature data.

Methods

PubMed was searched for articles reporting the effects of NTZ withdrawal in adult patients (⩾18 years) with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Definition of disease activity following NTZ discontinuation, proportion of patients who experienced post-NTZ disease reactivation, and timing to NTZ discontinuation to disease reactivation were systematically reviewed. A generic inverse variance with random effect was used to calculate the weighted effect of patients' clinical characteristics on the risk of post-NTZ disease reactivation, defined as the occurrence of at least one relapse.

Results

The original search identified 205 publications. Thirty-five articles were included in the systematic review. We found a high level of heterogeneity across studies in terms of sample size (10 to 1866 patients), baseline patient characteristics, follow up (1-24 months), outcome measures (clinical and/or radiological), and definition of post-NTZ disease reactivation or rebound. Clinical relapses were observed in 9-80% of patients and peaked at 4-7 months, whereas radiological disease activity was observed in 7-87% of patients starting at 6 weeks following NTZ discontinuation. The meta-analysis of six articles, yielding a total of 1183 patients, revealed that younger age, higher number of relapses and gadolinium-enhanced lesions before treatment start, and fewer NTZ infusions were associated with increased risk for post-NTZ disease reactivation (p ⩽ 0.05).

Conclusions

Results from the present review and meta-analysis can help to profile patients who are at greater risk of post-NTZ disease reactivation. However, potential reporting bias and variability in selected studies should be taken into account when interpreting our data.

Post-natalizumab disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Natalizumab (NTZ) is sometimes discontinued in patients with multiple sclerosis, mainly due to concerns about the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. However, NTZ interruption may result in recrudescence of disease activity.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to summarize the available evidence about NTZ discontinuation and to identify which patients will experience post-NTZ disease reactivation through meta-analysis of existing literature data.

Methods:

PubMed was searched for articles reporting the effects of NTZ withdrawal in adult patients (⩾18 years) with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Definition of disease activity following NTZ discontinuation, proportion of patients who experienced post-NTZ disease reactivation, and timing to NTZ discontinuation to disease reactivation were systematically reviewed. A generic inverse variance with random effect was used to calculate the weighted effect of patients’ clinical characteristics on the risk of post-NTZ disease reactivation, defined as the occurrence of at least one relapse.

Results:

The original search identified 205 publications. Thirty-five articles were included in the systematic review. We found a high level of heterogeneity across studies in terms of sample size (10 to 1866 patients), baseline patient characteristics, follow up (1–24 months), outcome measures (clinical and/or radiological), and definition of post-NTZ disease reactivation or rebound. Clinical relapses were observed in 9–80% of patients and peaked at 4–7 months, whereas radiological disease activity was observed in 7–87% of patients starting at 6 weeks following NTZ discontinuation. The meta-analysis of six articles, yielding a total of 1183 patients, revealed that younger age, higher number of relapses and gadolinium-enhanced lesions before treatment start, and fewer NTZ infusions were associated with increased risk for post-NTZ disease reactivation (p ⩽ 0.05).

Conclusions:

Results from the present review and meta-analysis can help to profile patients who are at greater risk of post-NTZ disease reactivation. However, potential reporting bias and variability in selected studies should be taken into account when interpreting our data.

Treatment with alemtuzumab or rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is effective and safe

BACKGROUND

It has been described that treating relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients with alemtuzumab following fingolimod could be less effective due to the different dynamics of lymphocyte repopulation. Effectiveness and safety of alemtuzumab compared to rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal were analyzed.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A follow-up of a cohort of RRMS patients treated with alemtuzumab or rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal was accomplished. Effectiveness, measured by the percentage of patients with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA), and the presence of side effects (SE) were registered.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients, 28 with alemtuzumab and 27 with rituximab, were analyzed. No differences in the washout period or in the baseline lymphocytes counts were observed. After a mean follow-up period of 28.8 months, the annualized relapsing rate was significantly reduced in the alemtuzumab group from 1.29 to 0.004 (p < 0.001) and in the rituximab group from 1.24 to 0.02 (p < 0.001), without differences. A significant reduction of the median EDSS from 2.8 to 2.0 in the alemtuzumab group and from 3.5 to 2.5 (p < 0.01) in the rituximab group was observed, without differences. Eighty-two per cent (n = 28) of patients in alemtuzumab group and 69.2% (n = 26) in rituximab group achieved NEDA criteria, without differences (p = 0.3). Symptoms related to the infusion were the most frequent SE in both groups. No serious SE were registered.

CONCLUSION

Treating RRMS patients with alemtuzumab or rituximab after fingolimod withdrawal is effective and safe, without significant differences between both groups in our series.

Enduring Clinical Value of Copaxone® (Glatiramer Acetate) in Multiple Sclerosis after 20 Years of Use

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative demyelinating disease affecting the central nervous system. Glatiramer acetate (GA; Copaxone®) was the first disease-modifying treatment (DMT) for MS successfully tested in humans (1977) and was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 1996. Since then, there have been numerous developments in the MS field: advances in neuroimaging allowing more rapid and accurate diagnosis; the availability of a range of DMTs including immunosuppressant monoclonal antibodies and oral agents; a more holistic approach to treatment by multidisciplinary teams; and an improved awareness of the need to consider a patient's preferences and patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life. The use of GA has endured throughout these advances. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the important developments in the MS field during the 20 years since GA was approved and to review clinical data for GA in MS, with the aim of understanding the continued and widespread use of GA. Both drug-related (efficacy versus side-effect profile and monitoring requirements) and patient factors (preferences regarding mode of administration and possible pregnancy) will be explored.

[Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome and rebound syndrome in multiple sclerosis patients who stopped disease modification therapy: current understanding and a case report]

More and more multiple sclerosis patients have been receiving treatment with new immunomodulatory drugs. Its discontinuation because of side-effects, lack of efficacy or pregnancy has been increasing as well. This paper reviews such severe complications of natalizumab and fingolimod cessation as immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) and rebound. The short history, immunopathogenesis and diagnostic criteria of IRIS in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus infection are covered. Clinical and radiological presentations as well as possible pathogenic mechanisms of IRIS in patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod are discussed. The authors also report the case of a woman with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod, who experienced a severe relapse when she stopped treatment. Diagnostic criteria and prognostic factors for IRIS and rebound are needed in patients with multiple sclerosis who discontinue the new disease modification therapy.

Catastrophic outcome of patients with a rebound after Natalizumab treatment discontinuation

INTRODUCTION

Natalizumab (NTZ) is an effective drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. In some patients discontinuation is mandatory due to the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. However, severe clinical and radiological worsening has been described after drug cessation. Our aim was to describe the clinical and radiological features of the rebound phenomenon.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients switched from NTZ to Fingolimod (FTY) who had presented a rebound after discontinuation were selected. Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data were collected.

RESULTS

Four JC virus positive patients were included. The mean disease duration was 9.5 years (SD: 4.12) with a mean time of 3.1 years on NTZ. All patients started FTY within 3-4 months. Neurological deterioration started in a mean time of 3.5 months (SD: 2.08) with multifocal involvement: 75% motor disturbances, 50% cognitive impairment, 25% seizures. The average worsening in Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] was of 3.25 points (SD: 2.33). The MRI showed a very large increase in T2 and gadolinium-enhanced lesions (mean: 23.67, SD: 18.58). All patients received 5 days of IV methylprednisolone, one patient required plasma exchange. All the patients presented neurological deterioration with an EDSS worsening of 1.13 points (SD: 0.48). After the rebound three patients continued treatment with FTY, only one patient restarted NTZ.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of NTZ treatment may trigger a severe rebound with marked clinical and radiological worsening. A very careful evaluation of benefit-risk should be considered before NTZ withdrawal, and a close monitoring and a short washout period is recommended after drug withdrawal.

Discontinuation of disease modifying treatments in middle aged multiple sclerosis patients. First line drugs vs natalizumab

BACKGROUND

Several disease-modifying drugs (DMD) are available for the treatment of MS, and most patients with relapsing-remitting disease are currently treated. Data on when and how DMD treatment can be safely discontinued are scarce.

METHODS

Fifteen MS patients, treated with natalizumab for >5 years without clinical and radiological signs of inflammatory disease activity, suspended treatment and were monitored with MRI examinations and clinical follow-up to determine recurrence of disease activity. This group was compared with a retrospectively analysed cohort comprising 55 MS patients treated with first-line DMDs discontinuing therapy in the time period of 1998-2015 after an analogous stable course.

RESULTS

Natalizumab discontinuers were followed for on average 19 months, and follow-up data for 56 months were available for first-line DMD quitters. Two-thirds of natalizumab treated patients experienced recurrent inflammatory disease activity, and one third had recurrence of rebound character. In contrast, 35% of first-line DMD quitters had mild recurrent disease activity, and no one exhibited rebound.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal of a first-line DMD after prolonged treatment in middle-aged MS patients with stable disease appears to be relatively safe, while natalizumab withdrawal in a similar group of patients cannot be safely done without starting alternative therapy.

Observational Study of Switching from Natalizumab to Immunomodulatory Drugs

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) on disease activity rebound in patients discontinuing natalizumab (NTZ).

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treated with NTZ for ≥1 year and who switched to DMDs (glatiramer acetate [GA] or interferon) were followed up for 12 months in clinical practice. Clinical outcomes after NTZ cessation were assessed every 3 months for 1 year and MRI was performed at 12 months.

RESULTS

Twelve months after switching from NTZ to DMDs, there were no significant differences in the annualized relapse rate (ARR) compared to the days that NTZ was used (0.3 vs. 0.1; p = 0.083); and the ARR never reached similar values to those prior to NTZ use (1.61; p < 0.001). The percentage of relapse-free patients after switching from NTZ was 71.4%. These patients did not have lower disease activity before NTZ compared with those with clinical relapses (1.3 vs. 1.7; p = 0.302), but they had lower Expanded Disability Status Scale scores (3.4 vs. 5.7; p = 0.001). DMDs had beneficial effects on MRI parameters, as 10 of 16 patients (62.5%) presented no evidence of radiological activity 12 months after NTZ discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RRMS and moderate disability who discontinued NTZ for safety reasons may benefit from the DMDs GA and interferon with no known risk for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

The use of natalizumab for multiple sclerosis

Natalizumab is a monoclonal antibody that acts as an α4 integrin antagonist to prevent leukocyte trafficking into the central nervous system. It is US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Natalizumab demonstrated high efficacy in Phase III trials by reducing the annualized relapse rate, preventing multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion accumulation on magnetic resonance imaging, and decreasing the probability of sustained progression of disability. The leading safety concern with natalizumab is its association with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare brain infection typically seen only in severely immunocompromised patients caused by reactivation of the John Cunningham virus (JCV). Careful analysis of risk factors for PML in natalizumab-treated MS patients, specifi-cally the presence of anti-JCV antibodies, has led to risk mitigation strategies to improve safety. Additional biomarkers are under investigation to further aid risk stratification. Natalizumab's high efficacy and favorable tolerability profile have led to a broad use by MS physicians, as both first-and second-line treatments. This review discusses the natalizumab efficacy, safety, and tolerability and finishes with pragmatic considerations regarding its use in clinical practice.

High-Risk PML Patients Switching from Natalizumab to Alemtuzumab: an Observational Study

Introduction

The choice of therapy in patients withdrawing from natalizumab treatment is still an open question and neurologists need strategies to manage this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate if alemtuzumab is able to control the disease when used in patient who have stopped natalizumab.

Methods

16 patients stopped natalizumab treatment after a median number of 20 infusions (range 12–114); all the patients were responders to natalizumab (neither clinical nor radiological activity during natalizumab therapy) and the reason for stopping was the risk of PML for all of them. Patients were switched to alemtuzumab after a median wash-out period of 70 days (range 41–99 days); patients underwent brain MRI every three months during natalizumab treatment and then just before starting alemtuzumab in order to exclude signs suggestive of PML; then, contrast-enhanced brain MRI was planned 6 and 12 months after alemtuzumab infusion.

Results

At present, 8 out of 16 patients have a follow-up >6 months and 2 out of 8 reached 1-year follow-up; 5 have a follow-up of 3–6 months and 3 have a follow-up <3 months. Brain MRI at 6 months after alemtuzumab is available for 8 out of 16 patients and in all of them, neither signs of disease activity nor new lesions are present; in 2 out of 8 patients, brain MRI at 12 months is also available, showing no sign of disease activity. Clinical evaluation performed at 6 and at 12 months (when available) showed stability, in particular neither relapses nor increase in EDSS were observed.

Conclusions

Alemtuzumab was able to control the disease course in patients who stopped natalizumab; of course, as this is a single-centre study and the number of patients is small, these findings are very preliminary and need further confirmation.

Disability Progression After Switching from Natalizumab to Fingolimod or Interferon Beta/Glatiramer Acetate Therapies: A NARCOMS Analysis

Background: Physicians must weigh the benefits against the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients treated with natalizumab, especially beyond 2 years. However, disability progression associated with switching therapies versus continuing natalizumab therapy after 2 years has not been fully evaluated. Methods: In this retrospective analysis using the NARCOMS Registry, disability progression (Patient-Determined Disease Steps [PDDS] scale) and physical health-related quality of life (HRQOL) worsening (12-item Short Form Health Status Survey Physical Component Score [SF-12 PCS]) were compared between participants switching to fingolimod (n = 50) or interferon beta (IFNβ)/glatiramer acetate (GA) (n = 71) therapy and those continuing natalizumab (n = 406) after 2 years or more of treatment (median follow-up: natalizumab, 4 years; fingolimod, 4.5 years; IFNβ/GA, 5 years). Results: Participants continuing to take natalizumab had less disability progression (mean PDDS change: natalizumab, 0.3; fingolimod, 0.6; IFNβ/GA, 0.7; P = .0036), were less likely to report disability progression (proportion with PDDS increase: natalizumab, 31%; fingolimod, 46%; IFNβ/GA, 42%; P = .0296), and had less worsening in physical HRQOL (mean SF-12 PCS change: natalizumab, -1.4; fingolimod, -2.8; IFNβ/GA, -4.6; P = .0476) than those switching treatment. Conclusions: Although all medication groups exhibited some level of worsening, switching from natalizumab treatment after 2 years was associated with increased disability progression and worsening physical HRQOL. The risk of disability progression from disease activity and the risk of PML should be considered when making natalizumab treatment decisions.

Lack of magnetic resonance imaging lesion activity as a treatment target in multiple sclerosis: An evaluation using electronically collected outcomes

BACKGROUND

The appropriate treatment target in multiple sclerosis (MS) is unclear. Lack of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion activity, a component of the no evidence of disease activity concept, has been proposed as a treatment target in MS. We used our MS database to investigate whether aggressively pursuing MRI stability by changing disease modifying therapy (DMT) when MRI activity is observed leads to better clinical and imaging outcomes.

METHODS

The Knowledge Program (KP) is a database linked to our electronic medical record allowing capture of patient and clinician reported outcomes. Through KP query and chart review, we identified all relapsing-remitting MS patients visiting between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2014 with active MRIs despite DMT. Propensity modeling based on demographic and disease characteristics was used to match DMT switchers to non-switchers. KP and MRI outcomes were compared 18 months after the active MRI using mixed-effects linear regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 417 patients who met criteria for our analysis. After propensity matching, 78 switchers and 91 non-switchers were analyzed. There was no difference in clinical or radiologic outcomes between these groups at 18 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find a short-term benefit of changing DMT to pursue MRI stability.

New insights into the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natalizumab treatment for patients with multiple sclerosis, obtained from clinical and in vitro studies

BACKGROUND

The monoclonal antibody natalizumab (NAT) inhibits the migration of lymphocytes throughout the blood-brain barrier by blocking very late antigen (VLA)-4 interactions, thereby reducing inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) activity in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). We evaluated the effects of different NAT treatment regimens.

METHODS

We developed and optimised a NAT assay to measure free NAT, cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 expression levels in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients using standard and prolonged treatment intervals and after the cessation of therapy.

RESULTS

In paired CSF and blood samples of NAT-treated MS patients, NAT concentrations in CSF were approximately 100-fold lower than those in serum. Cell-bound NAT and mean VLA-4 expression levels in CSF were comparable with those in blood. After the cessation of therapy, the kinetics of free NAT, cell-bound NAT and VLA-4 expression levels differed. Prolonged intervals greater than 4 weeks between infusions caused a gradual reduction of free and cell-bound NAT concentrations. Sera from patients with and without NAT-neutralising antibodies could be identified in a blinded assessment. The NAT-neutralising antibodies removed NAT from the cell surface in vivo and in vitro. Intercellular NAT exchange was detected in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating assays to measure free and cell-bound NAT into clinical practice can help to determine the optimal individual NAT dosing regimen for patients with MS.

Neuroimmunotherapies Targeting T Cells: From Pathophysiology to Therapeutic Applications

Therapeutic options for multiple sclerosis (MS) have significantly increased over the last few years. T lymphocytes are considered to play a central role in initiating and perpetuating the pathological immune response. Currently approved therapies for MS target T lymphocytes, either in an unspecific manner or directly by interference with specific T-cell pathways. While the concept of "T-cell-specific therapy" implies specificity and selectivity, currently approved approaches come from a general shaping of the immune system towards anti-inflammatory immune responses by non-T-cell-selective immune suppression or immune modulation (e.g., interferons-immune modulation approach) to a depletion of immune cell populations involving T cells (e.g., anti-CD52, alemtuzumab-immune selective depletion approach), or a selective inhibition of distinct molecular pathways in order to sequester leucocytes (e.g., natalizumab-leukocyte sequestration approach). This review will highlight the rationale and results of different T-cell-directed therapeutic approaches coming from basic animal experiments to clinical trials. We will first discuss the pathophysiological rationale for targeting T lymphocytes in MS leading to currently approved treatments acting on T lymphocytes. Furthermore, we will disuss previous promising concepts that have failed to show efficacy in clinical trials or were halted as a result of unexpected adverse events. Learning from the discrepancies between expectations and failures in practical outcomes helps to optimize future research approaches and clinical study designs. As our current view of MS pathogenesis and patient needs is rapidly evolving, novel therapeutic approaches targeting T lymphocytes will also be discussed, including specific molecular interventions such as cytokine-directed treatments or strategies enhancing immunoregulatory mechanisms. Based on clinical experience and novel pathophysiological approaches, T-cell-based strategies will remain a pillarstone of MS therapy.

Natalizumab Discontinuation and Treatment Strategies in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS): A Retrospective Study from Two Italian MS Centers

Introduction

Natalizumab (NTZ) discontinuation can be followed by multiple sclerosis (MS) disease reactivation. Currently no disease-modifying drug (DMD) has been shown to be able to abolish disease reactivation. The aims of the current study were: (1) to determine the frequency of MS reactivation after NTZ discontinuation; (2) to evaluate predictors of reactivation risk, and (3) to compare the effect of different treatments in reducing this risk.

Methods

Data from 132 patients with MS followed-up for 2 years before NTZ treatment and 1 year after interruption were collected from two Italian MS centers and retrospectively evaluated.

Results

Overall, 72 of 132 patients (54.5%) had relapses after NTZ discontinuation and 60 of 125 patients (48%), who had magnetic resonance imaging, had radiological reactivation. Rebound was observed in 28 of 132 patients (21.2%). A higher number of relapses in the 2 years before NTZ treatment, a longer washout period, and a lower number NTZ infusions correlated with reactivation and rebound. Untreated patients (n = 37) had higher clinical and radiological activity and rebound in comparison to patients receiving DMDs. Moreover, a lower risk of relapses was found in patients treated with second-line therapies (NTZ and fingolimod) than in those treated with first-line therapies (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, azathioprine). Interestingly, no disease reactivation in off-label treatment (rituximab, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) was observed.

Conclusion

NTZ discontinuation is a risk for MS reactivation and rebound. An alternative treatment should be promptly resumed mainly in patients with a previous very active disease course and with a shorter NTZ therapy. Second-line therapies demonstrate superiority in preventing relapses after NTZ discontinuation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40120-015-0038-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical and radiologic rebound after discontinuation of natalizumab therapy in a highly active multiple sclerosis patient was not halted by dimethyl-fumarate: a case report

Background

The evidence on the use of the oral dimethyl-fumarate after the discontinuation of treatment with natalizumab in people with Multiple Sclerosis is still little. Natalizumab discontinuation may induce the recurrence or rebound of the clinical and neuroradiological disease activity. Currently no therapeutic approach has been established to abolish disease reactivation and rebound after natalizumab interruption.

Case Presentation

We describe a case of a 21-year-old woman affected from a highly active relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis who developed a clinical and radiological rebound 5 months after the last infusion of natalizumab, while she was being treated with dimethyl-fumarate 240 mg twice daily. She had received a bridge “therapy” with Cyclophosphamide before staring dimethyl-fumarate.

Conclusion

We report on this case to stimulate further research to establish whether new current and future drugs available for multiple sclerosis are able to halt the disease rebound after the natalizumab interruption.

Natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: discontinuation, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and possible use in children

In the early 1990s, attention was drawn to the migration of immune cells into the central nervous system via the blood-brain barrier. The literature showed that lymphocytes binding to the endothelium were successfully inhibited by an antibody against α4β1 integrin. These biological findings resulted in the development of a humanized antibody to α4 integrin - natalizumab (NTZ) - to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). Here, we provide a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of natalizumab, trying to answer the question whether its use may be recommended both in adult and in pediatric age groups as standard MS treatment. Our results highlight the improvement of clinical and radiological findings in treated patients (p < 0.005), confirming NTZ efficacy. Nevertheless, if NTZ is shown to be efficient, further studies should be performed to evaluate its safety and to target the MS profile that could benefit from this treatment.

Fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate after natalizumab suspension in multiple sclerosis

The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod versus interferon beta/glatiramer acetate was assessed in a multicentre, observational, prospectively acquired cohort study including 613 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis discontinuing natalizumab in the Italian iMedWeb registry. First, after natalizumab suspension, the relapse risk during the untreated wash-out period and during the course of switch therapies was estimated through Poisson regression analyses in separated models. During the wash-out period an increased risk of relapses was found in patients with a higher number of relapses before natalizumab treatment (incidence rate ratio = 1.31, P = 0.0014) and in patients discontinuing natalizumab due to lack of efficacy (incidence rate ratio = 2.33, P = 0.0288), patient's choice (incidence rate ratio = 2.18, P = 0.0064) and adverse events (incidence rate ratio = 2.09, P = 0.0084). The strongest independent factors influencing the relapse risk after the start of switch therapies were a wash-out duration longer than 3 months (incidence rate ratio = 1.78, P < 0.0001), the number of relapses experienced during and before natalizumab treatment (incidence rate ratio = 1.61, P < 0.0001; incidence rate ratio = 1.13, P = 0.0118, respectively) and the presence of comorbidities (incidence rate ratio = 1.4, P = 0.0097). Switching to fingolimod was associated with a 64% reduction of the adjusted-risk for relapse in comparison with switching to interferon beta/glatiramer acetate (incidence rate ratio = 0.36, P < 0.0001). Secondly, patients who switched to fingolimod or to interferon beta/glatiramer acetate were propensity score-matched on a 1-to-1 basis at the switching date. In the propensity score-matched sample a Poisson model showed a significant lower incidence of relapses in patients treated with fingolimod in comparison with those treated with interferon beta/glatiramer acetate (incidence rate ratio = 0.52, P = 0.0003) during a 12-month follow-up. The cumulative probability of a first relapse after the treatment switch was significantly lower in patients receiving fingolimod than in those receiving interferon beta/glatiramer acetate (P = 0.028). The robustness of this result was also confirmed by sensitivity analyses in subgroups with different wash-out durations (less or more than 3 months). Time to 3-month confirmed disability progression was not significantly different between the two groups (Hazard ratio = 0.58; P = 0.1931). Our results indicate a superiority of fingolimod in comparison to interferon beta/glatiramer acetate in controlling disease reactivation after natalizumab discontinuation in the real life setting.

Incorporating real-world clinical practice in multiple sclerosis economic evaluations

Using evidence from short-term randomized controlled trials, decision-analytic models project costs, risks and benefits of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS). Such trial-informed models lack the breadth needed to generalize to clinical practice or policy due to limitations: lack of DMT switching/discontinuation, limited head-to-head DMT comparisons and efficacy, not effectiveness, designs. We present an illustrative example that incorporates treatment switching and discontinuation by estimating the cost-effectiveness (value) of first-line natalizumab versus second-line natalizumab treatment for relapsing-remitting MS patients negative for anti-JC virus antibodies. Treating JC virus-negative relapsing-remitting MS patients with natalizumab as first-line provided better value compared with second-line. Decision-makers should consider this evidence for treatment step-edit policies through modeling scenarios closer to clinical practice.

Increased relapse activity for multiple sclerosis natalizumab users who become nonpersistent: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab disease-modifying therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is efficacious in randomized controlled trials. Few studies have estimated the association between real-world natalizumab persistence behavior and relapse-related outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) examine the impact of using natalizumab consistently (i.e., persistent) on relapse-related outcomes as compared with transitioning to inconsistent natalizumab use (i.e., nonpersistent) and (b) examine the impact of other treatment patterns on relapse-related outcomes for those who initiated natalizumab.

METHODS

Using the IMS PharMetrics Plus claims database (years 2006-2012), we identified MS subjects who initiated natalizumab (no natalizumab claims in year prior) and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Persistence in annual follow-up periods was defined as no 90-day or greater gap in natalizumab therapy. Relapse was an MS-related hospitalization or outpatient visit with intravenous or oral steroid burst claim within 7 days. Analyses compared observations based on changes in natalizumab persistence and natalizumab nonpersistence status from 1 year to the next (e.g., transitioning from persistent to nonpersistent), estimating differences in mean annual relapses and mean annual relapse-related costs.

RESULTS

A total of 2,407 natalizumab initiators had at least 2 years of follow-up, yielding 4,770 year-to-year natalizumab treatment patterns where each subject contributed 1, 2, or 3 year-to-year treatment patterns. In the year prior, 3,187 treatment patterns were persistent; 731 (22.9%) of these transitioned to nonpersistence. The remaining 1,583 treatment patterns were nonpersistent in the year prior; 132 (8.3%) of these transitioned to persistence. Persistent to nonpersistent treatment patterns were associated with a mean relapse-rate increase of 0.23 (95% CI = 0.12, 0.35), and a mean increase in relapse-related costs of $1,346 (95% CI = $97, $2,595). Nonpersistent to persistent treatment patterns were associated with a mean relapse-rate decrease of -0.15 (95% CI = -0.32, 0.017) and a mean decrease in relapse-related costs of -$1,369 (95% CI = -$2,761, $23).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that real-world persistent natalizumab users who become nonpersistent have statistically significant increases in annual relapses and relapse-related costs. Those who transition from nonpersistent to persistent have nonsignificant reductions in relapses and their associated costs.

Significant clinical worsening after natalizumab withdrawal: Predictive factors

We aimed to single out multiple sclerosis (MS) cases with poor outcome after natalizumab withdrawal and to identify predictive variables. We ascertained 47 withdrawals, and compared their pre- and post-natalizumab periods. We objectively defined significant clinical worsening after natalizumab withdrawal as a 2-step increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We performed regression models. As a group, post-natalizumab annualized relapse rate (ARR) was lower in the post-natalizumab period, and there were no differences in the mean number of gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions between pre- and post-natalizumab magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Corticosteroid treatment did not change the outcomes. Eight patients (19%) presented significant clinical worsening after natalizumab withdrawal, which was predicted by a higher baseline EDSS and a 1-step EDSS increase while on natalizumab.

Radiologic MS disease activity during natalizumab treatment interruption: findings from RESTORE

The objective of this study is to characterize the timing and extent of radiologic MS disease recurrence during the 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption period in RESTORE. RESTORE was a randomized, partially placebo-controlled exploratory study. Natalizumab-treated patients with no gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions at screening (n = 175) were randomized 1:1:2 to continue natalizumab (n = 45), switch to placebo (n = 42), or switch to other therapies (n = 88) for 24 weeks. MRI assessments were performed every 4 weeks. Predictors of increased numbers of Gd+ lesions during natalizumab treatment interruption were evaluated. The numbers of Gd+ lesions were compared with retrospectively collected pre-natalizumab MRI reports and data from placebo-treated patients from two historical randomized clinical trials. Gd+ lesions were detected in 0 % (0/45) of natalizumab patients, 61 % (25/41) of placebo patients, and 48 % (39/81) of other-therapies patients during the randomized treatment period. Gd+ lesions were detected starting at week 12; most were observed at week 16 or later. Thirteen percent (14/107) of patients had >5 Gd+ lesions on ≥1 (of 6) scans during the randomized treatment period versus 7 % (7/107) of patients pre-natalizumab (based on medical record of a single scan). Younger patients and those with more Gd+ lesions pre-natalizumab were more likely to have increased MRI activity. Distribution of total and persistent Gd+ lesions in RESTORE patients was similar to placebo-treated historical control patients. In most patients, recurring radiological disease activity during natalizumab interruption did not exceed pre-natalizumab levels or levels seen in historical control patients.

Multiple sclerosis reactivation postfingolimod cessation: is it IRIS?

Although few recent studies have reported efficacy and safety data among patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) switching between immunotherapies, data on the mechanism of rebound activity postwithdrawal of fingolimod in patients with MS is scarce. A 36-year-old woman developed severe reactivation of her disease within 7 weeks of fingolimod's withdrawal despite the absence of breakthrough disease during the 8-week natalizumab washout period previously. The clinical presentation and radiological features were described indicating the diagnostic challenge given the potential risk of developing progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy. The severe reactivation postwithdrawal of fingolimod could be due to the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) given the abrupt rise in lymphocyte count. Patients who discontinued fingolimod might be at risk of developing IRIS resulting in disease reactivation in the washout period.

Recurrence of disease activity after repeated Natalizumab withdrawals

Natalizumab (NTZ) is extremely effective in reducing disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients but its long-term use is associated with the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Thus, many patients discontinue NTZ and, after drug withdrawal, most of them face disease reactivation despite immunomodulant (IMD) start. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic strategies in preventing post-NTZ disease recurrence in a small cohort of patients that underwent repeated NTZ courses. 15 patients underwent two distinct NTZ discontinuations and started IMD after first withdrawal and a second line therapy (mainly fingolimod, FTY) after the second one. They were followed with periodic clinical and neuroradiological evaluations. All patients showed disease reactivation after first withdrawal and 13 out of 15 relapsed after the second one. In both the occasions annualized relapse rate (ARR) significantly increased as compared to on-treatment period (from 0.03 to 1.5 and from 0.26 to 1.71) with no differences between the two NTZ-free periods. Likewise, the mean number of Gd enhancing lesions increased both times to similar values (3.1 and 2.9). Median time to disease recurrence was comparable (4.7 and 5.7 months, p = 0.57). This study demonstrated recurrence of disease activity after two distinct NTZ discontinuations despite the treatment with IMD or more aggressive therapy, when used according to recent safety recommendations. Therefore, we need different therapeutic strategies to cope with the risk of post-NTZ disease recurrence and a "bridging strategy" with an earlier switch to second line drugs should be taken into account.

What to expect after natalizumab cessation in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

To minimize the risk of progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy (PML), treatment with natalizumab is often stopped after 2 years, but evidence upon rebound of disease activity is limited and controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effects of natalizumab discontinuation on clinical disease activity within twelve months after cessation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 201 patients with MS who discontinued natalizumab between 2007 and 2012. Mean change scores of annualized relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) were calculated for detection of rebound disease activity after twelve months.

RESULTS

Natalizumab exposure did not exceed 2 years in 50.2% of patients, and the most common reasons for discontinuation were a long treatment period and concern of PML (56%). A total of 11.9% experienced a rebound phenomenon within twelve months. Mean ARR prenatalizumab was lower (P = 0.001, 95% CI -1.0-0.000) and treatment response to natalizumab poorer (P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.4-1.3) in patients with rebound compared to those without, but rebound was not associated with brief exposure to natalizumab (P = 0.159, 95% CI -9.3-1.5). 86.1% of patients switched to another therapy. Patients without rebound were found more often in the group starting an alternative treatment early (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that rebound of MS disease activity affects a subgroup of patients (11.9%), especially those with low disease activity before natalizumab therapy and a longer treatment gap after its withdrawal.

Treatment options to reduce disease activity after natalizumab: paradoxical effects of corticosteroids

AIM

Natalizumab (NTZ) discontinuation leads to multiple sclerosis (MS) recurrence, but represents the only known strategy to limit the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in JCV seropositive patients. Here, we compared the clinical and imaging features of three groups of patients who discontinued NTZ treatment.

METHODS

We treated 25 patients with subcutaneous INFβ-1b (INF group), 40 patients with glatiramer acetate (GA group), and 40 patients with GA plus pulse steroid (GA+CS group).

RESULTS

Six of 25 patients (24%) of the INF group were relapse-free 6 months after NTZ suspension. In GA group, a significant higher proportion of patients (26 of 40 patients, 65%) were relapse-free (P<0.05). Far from improving the clinical effects of GA in post-NTZ setting, combination of GA+CS was associated with lower relapse-free rate than GA alone (40% vs. 65%, P=0.04). Also on MRI parameters, combination of GA+CS was associated with worse outcome than GA alone, as 22 of 26 subjects (84.6%) had MRI evidence of disease activity 6 months after NTZ discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Corticosteroids should not be used in combination with GA to prevent post-NTZ disease recurrence.

Therapeutic approaches to disease modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis in adults: an Australian and New Zealand perspective: part 3 treatment practicalities and recommendations. MS Neurology Group of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Neurologists

In this third and final part of our review of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment we look at the practical day-to-day management issues that are likely to influence individual treatment decisions. Whilst efficacy is clearly of considerable importance, tolerability and the potential for adverse effects often play a significant role in informing individual patient decisions. Here we review the issues surrounding switching between therapies, and the evidence to assist guiding the choice of therapy to change to and when to change. We review the current level of evidence with regards to the management of women in their child-bearing years with regards to recommendations about treatment during pregnancy and whilst breast feeding. We provide a summary of recommended pre- and post-treatment monitoring for the available therapies and review the evidence with regards to the value of testing for antibodies which are known to be neutralising for some therapies. We review the occurrence of adverse events, both the more common and troublesome effects and those that are less common but have potentially much more serious outcomes. Ways of mitigating these risks and managing the more troublesome adverse effects are also reviewed. Finally, we make specific recommendations with regards to the treatment of MS. It is an exciting time in the world of MS neurology and the prospects for further advances in coming years are high.

Predictors for multiple sclerosis relapses after switching from natalizumab to fingolimod

BACKGROUND

Risks of natalizumab (NAT) therapy have to be weighed against disease recurrence after stopping NAT.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this paper is to identify risk factors for recurrence of relapses after switching from NAT to fingolimod (FTY) in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

Patients (n = 33) were treated with NAT for ≥1 year, and then switched to FTY within 24 weeks (mean follow-up on FTY 81.1 (SD 26.5) weeks). Annual relapse rates (ARR) and Expanded Disability Status Scale scores (EDSS) were assessed. Descriptive statistics, univariate logistic regression analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curves were conducted.

RESULTS

Overall, 20 patients (61%) had relapses after discontinuation of NAT and 16 (48%) during FTY therapy. The maximum incidence of relapses occurred between weeks 13-24 post-NAT. The last EDSS during the switching period predicted relapses during subsequent FTY therapy. EDSS >3 separated most powerfully between the groups (sensitivity 64%, specificity 88%) and significantly predicted relapses (relative risk 3.27, 95% CI: 1.5-7.3). Seventy-five percent of patients with EDSS ≤ 3 remained free of relapses, compared to 18% of patients with EDSS >3.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an increase of the ARR in the first year after switching from NAT to FTY. Last EDSS during the switching period was a predictor of relapses during FTY.

Long-term management of natalizumab discontinuation in a large monocentric cohort of multiple sclerosis patients

BACKGROUND

Pivotal and post-marketing studies demonstrated the impressive efficacy and the good tolerability profile of natalizumab in Multiple Sclerosis patients. On the other hand long-term safety of natalizumab therapy is burdened by the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, especially in anti-JCV seropositive patients treated for more than two years. Some of these patients must stop the drug at the risk of disease reactivation.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of natalizumab discontinuation in a monocentric cohort of multiple sclerosis patients followed for a mean time of 22.4 months.

METHODS

One hundred and ten patients, who stopped therapy after at least 12 infusions, were followed with periodic clinical and magnetic resonance imaging evaluations. One hundred patients started either immunomodulant therapy (n=90) or fingolimod (n=10) while 10 remained without any drug.

RESULTS

"Disease-activity free" patients were 25% at one year after discontinuation and annualized relapse rate significantly increased from 0.06 to 0.84 (p<0.0001). We found that the risk of reactivation peaked despite alternative treatments between the second and the eighth month after suspension, a so-called "high risk period". During this period the majority of patients showed a return to pre-natalizumab disease activity while 10% of patients presented a "rebound activity". A higher pre-natalizumab disease activity was correlated with an increased risk of reactivation (p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that disease reactivation peaked during a "high risk period" between the second and the eighth month since stopping the drug. During this period no alternative treatments seemed to provide an adequate protection from disease reactivation. Though transient, this phase could be potentially dangerous, therefore we need to develop more effective strategies to deal with this challenge.

Monoclonal antibodies in treatment of multiple sclerosis

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are used as therapeutics in a number of disciplines in medicine, such as oncology, rheumatology, gastroenterology, dermatology and transplant rejection prevention. Since the introduction and reintroduction of the anti-alpha4-integrin mAb natalizumab in 2004 and 2006, mAbs have gained relevance in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). At present, numerous mAbs have been tested in clinical trials in relapsing-remitting MS, and in progressive forms of MS. One of the agents that might soon be approved for very active forms of relapsing-remitting MS is alemtuzumab, a humanized mAb against CD52. This review provides insights into clinical studies with the mAbs natalizumab, alemtuzumab, daclizumab, rituximab, ocrelizumab and ofatumumab.

MS disease activity in RESTORE: a randomized 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption study

OBJECTIVE

RESTORE was a randomized, partially placebo-controlled exploratory study evaluating multiple sclerosis (MS) disease activity during a 24-week interruption of natalizumab.

METHODS

Eligible patients were relapse-free through the prior year on natalizumab and had no gadolinium-enhancing lesions on screening brain MRI. Patients were randomized 1:1:2 to continue natalizumab, to switch to placebo, or to receive alternative immunomodulatory therapy (other therapies: IM interferon β-1a [IM IFN-β-1a], glatiramer acetate [GA], or methylprednisolone [MP]). During the 24-week randomized treatment period, patients underwent clinical and MRI assessments every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 175) were randomized to natalizumab (n = 45), placebo (n = 42), or other therapies (n = 88: IM IFN-β-1a, n = 17; GA, n = 17; MP, n = 54). Of 167 patients evaluable for efficacy, 49 (29%) had MRI disease activity recurrence: 0/45 (0%) natalizumab, 19/41 (46%) placebo, 1/14 (7%) IM IFN-β-1a, 8/15 (53%) GA, and 21/52 (40%) MP. Relapse occurred in 4% of natalizumab patients and in 15%-29% of patients in the other treatment arms. MRI disease activity recurred starting at 12 weeks (n = 3 at week 12) while relapses were reported as early as 4-8 weeks (n = 2 in weeks 4-8) after the last natalizumab dose. Overall, 50/167 patients (30%), all in placebo or other-therapies groups, restarted natalizumab early because of disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI and clinical disease activity recurred in some patients during natalizumab interruption, despite use of other therapies.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with MS taking natalizumab who are relapse-free for 1 year, stopping natalizumab increases the risk of MS relapse or MRI disease activity as compared with continuing natalizumab.

Fingolimod after natalizumab and the risk of short-term relapse

OBJECTIVE

To determine early risk of relapse after switch from natalizumab to fingolimod; to compare the switch experience to that in patients switching from interferon-β/glatiramer acetate (IFN-β/GA) and those previously treatment naive; and to determine predictors of time to first relapse on fingolimod.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the MSBase Registry. Relapse rates (RRs) for each patient group were compared using adjusted negative binomial regression. Survival analyses coupled with adjusted Cox regression were used to model predictors of time to first relapse on fingolimod.

RESULTS

A total of 536 patients (natalizumab-fingolimod [n = 89]; IFN-β/GA-fingolimod [n = 350]; naive-fingolimod [n = 97]) were followed up for a median 10 months. In the natalizumab-fingolimod group, there was a small increase in RR on fingolimod (annualized RR [ARR] 0.38) relative to natalizumab (ARR 0.26; p = 0.002). RRs were generally low across all patient groups in the first 9 months on fingolimod (RR 0.001-0.13). However, 30% of patients with disease activity on natalizumab relapsed within the first 6 months on fingolimod. Independent predictors of time to first relapse on fingolimod were the number of relapses in the prior 6 months (hazard ratio [HR] 1.59 per relapse; p = 0.002) and a gap in treatment of 2-4 months compared to no gap (HR 2.10; p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

RRs after switch to fingolimod were low in all patient groups. The strongest predictor of relapse on fingolimod was prior relapse activity. Based on our data, we recommend a maximum 2-month treatment gap for switches to fingolimod to decrease the hazard of relapse.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that RRs are not higher in patients with multiple sclerosis switching to fingolimod from natalizumab compared to those patients switching to fingolimod from other therapies.