Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy: a systematic review of 122 cases reported

Review of atypical optic neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON), an inflammatory optic neuropathy, is among the most common causes of visual loss. In its initial clinical appearance, ON may have unilateral or bilateral presentation, and anterior (papillitis) or retrobulbar localization. Traditionally, cases are divided into typical and atypical ON. In the Western hemisphere, most typical cases of optic nerve inflammation are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, ON may also be associated with a series of disorders of known or initially undetected origin. Atypical ON has a somewhat different clinical picture from typical ON, and encompasses neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), idiopathic recurrent neuroretinitis (NR), chronic relapsing inflammatory ON (CRION), ON within systemic autoimmune diseases, paraneoplastic and neuritis during or after infectious diseases or vaccination. The causes should be meticulously worked up, to address the therapeutic and prognostic challenges posed by these conditions. Here, we provide a brief overview of atypical ON, as encountered in our clinical practice, and additionally discuss the possible occurrence of optic neuropathies other than inflammatory and other ocular diseases within these disorders.

Isolated Optic Neuritis: Etiology, Characteristics, and Outcomes in a US Mountain West Cohort

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune optic neuritis (ON) has improved with the accessibility and reliability of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody testing, yet autoantibody-negative ON remains common. This study describes the demographic, clinical, and outcome data in patients with isolated ON across the pediatric and adult cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of University of Utah Health patients with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code of ICD-9 377.30 (ON unspecified), ICD-9 377.39 (other ON), or ICD-10 H46 (ON) and at least 2 ophthalmologic evaluations were conducted between February 2011 and July 2023. Only isolated cases of ON without other brain or spinal demyelinating lesions were evaluated. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between AQP4, MOG, and Other-ON were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 98 patients (15 children and 83 adults), 9 (9.2%) were positive for AQP4-IgG and 35 (35.7%) tested positive for MOG-IgG. Fifty-four were classified into Other-ON, of which 7 (13.0%) had recurrence or new demyelinating lesions during a median follow-up of 12.5 months-2 were ultimately diagnosed with recurrent isolated ON (RION), 1 with chronic relapsing inflammatory ON (CRION), 2 with multiple sclerosis, 1 with collapsin response-mediator protein (CRMP)-5-ON, and 1 with seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Four patients were treated with long-term immunosuppressive therapy. No patients with RION or CRION had preceding infections; they had first recurrences of ON within 2 months. At presentation, AQP4-ON (75%) and MOG-ON (48.8%) had more severe vision loss (visual acuity <20/200) than Other-ON (23.2%, P = 0.01). At the 1-month follow-up, 93.0% of patients with MOG-ON and 89.3% of patients with Other-ON demonstrated a visual acuity ≥20/40, compared with only 50% of patients with AQP4-ON (P < 0.01). By the last follow-up, 37.5% of the AQP4-ON still exhibited visual acuity <20/40, including 25% who experienced severe vision loss (visual acuity <20/200). By contrast, over 95% of patients with MOG-ON and Other-ON maintained a visual acuity of ≥20/40. In our cohort, over a quarter of pediatric cases presented with simultaneous bilateral ON, 40% had a preceding infection, and 44.4% initially presented with a visual acuity <20/200. Two pediatric cases had recurrence, and both were MOG-ON. By their last follow-up, all pediatric cases had achieved a visual acuity of 20/40 or better. In addition, pediatric cases were more likely to exhibit disc edema compared with adult cases (100% vs 64%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recent advances in identification and availability of testing for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG, over half of patients who presented with isolated ON remained with an "idiopathic" diagnostic label. As more than 1 in 10 patients with AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG negative ON experienced recurrence or develop new demyelinating lesions, clinicians should provide anticipatory guidance and closely monitor for potential long-term outcomes. In addition, it is crucial to re-evaluate the diagnosis in cases of poor recovery, ON recurrence, and the emergence of new neurological symptoms, as ON can often be the initial presentation of other conditions.

Beyond Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein and Aquaporin-4 Antibodies: Alternative Causes of Optic Neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of vision loss in young adults. It manifests as acute or subacute vision loss, often accompanied by retrobulbar discomfort or pain during eye movements. Typical ON is associated with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and is generally mild and steroid-responsive. Atypical forms are characterized by unusual features, such as prominent optic disc edema, poor treatment response, and bilateral involvement, and they are often associated with autoantibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4) or Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein (MOG). However, in some cases, AQP4 and MOG antibodies will return as negative, plunging the clinician into a diagnostic conundrum. AQP4- and MOG-seronegative ON warrants a broad differential diagnosis, including autoantibody-associated, granulomatous, and systemic disorders. These rare forms need to be identified promptly, as their management and prognosis are greatly different. The aim of this review is to describe the possible rarer etiologies of non-MS-related and AQP4- and MOG-IgG-seronegative inflammatory ON and discuss their diagnoses and treatments.

An update on optic neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is the most common cause of subacute optic neuropathy in young adults. Although most cases of optic neuritis (ON) are classified as typical, meaning idiopathic or associated with multiple sclerosis, there is a growing understanding of atypical forms of optic neuritis such as antibody mediated aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and the recently described entity, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). Differentiating typical ON from atypical ON is important because they have different prognoses and treatments. Findings of atypical ON, including severe vision loss with poor recovery with steroids or steroid dependence, prominent optic disc edema, bilateral vision loss, and childhood or late adult onset, should prompt serologic testing for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG. Although the traditional division of typical and atypical ON can be helpful, it should be noted that there can be severe presentations of otherwise typical ON and mild presentations of atypical ON that blur these traditional lines. Rare causes of autoimmune optic neuropathies, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and collapsin response-mediator protein 5 (CRMP5) autoimmunity also should be considered in patients with bilateral painless optic neuropathy associated with optic disc edema, especially if there are other accompanying suggestive neurologic symptoms/signs. Typical ON usually recovers well without treatment, though recovery may be expedited by steroids. Atypical ON is usually treated with intravenous steroids, and some forms, such as NMOSD, often require plasma exchange for acute attacks and long-term immunosuppressive therapy to prevent relapses. Since treatment is tailored to the cause of the ON, elucidating the etiology of the ON is of the utmost importance.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of optic neuritis in Taiwan - a hospital-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory disease of optic nerve. The distinct etiologies of ON significantly influence its clinical manifestation, neuroimaging findings, and visual outcomes. However, the clinical characteristics might be influenced by the racial differences. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical characteristics of various types of ON at a Taiwanese tertiary center.

METHODS

This cohort study analyzed 163 patients who received treatment and continued following-up for ON between 2015 and 2022. We selected patients who had been tested for anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab) and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab). The participants were classified into four groups on the basis of their etiologies, specifically (1) multiple sclerosis (MS)-related, (2) AQP4-Ab-positive, (3) MOG-Ab-positive, or (4) idiopathic ON. The researchers recorded the patients' clinical characteristics, treatment course, magnetic resonance imaging and optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, and visual outcomes.

RESULTS

MOG-Ab-positive group had higher percentages of disk swelling and pain with eye movement. Long optic nerve and perineural enhancement are the hallmarks of MOG-Ab-related ON. The ON relapse rate was higher in AQP4-Ab-positive group. Although members of AQP4-Ab-positive group received immediate steroid pulse therapy, these patients experienced the worst visual outcomes. Moreover, a thinner retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) was noted in AQP4-Ab-positive group. MS group had a higher incidence of extra-optic nerve lesions. Multivariate regression identified pretreatment visual acuity and RNFL thickness as the important factors affecting visual outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort study identified the clinical features of different types of ON. Patients with AQP4-Ab-positive ON had poorer visual outcomes, which may be attributed to multiple relapses and profound nerve damage, as revealed by OCT findings. Patients with MOG-Ab-positive ON displayed long optic nerve enhancement but had more favorable prognoses. Thus, antibody-based classification facilitates treatment and prognosis in ON.

Serum proteins for monitoring and predicting visual function in patients with recent optic neuritis

It is unclear whether serum proteins can serve as biomarkers to reflect pathological changes and predict recovery in inflammation of optic nerve. We evaluated whether serum proteins could monitor and prognosticate optic neuritis (ON). We prospectively recruited consecutive patients with recent ON, classified as ON with anti-aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-ON), ON with anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-ON), and double-seronegative ON (DSN-ON). Using ultrasensitive single-molecule array assays, we measured serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). We analyzed the markers according to disease group, state, severity, and prognosis. We enrolled 60 patients with recent ON (15 AQP4-ON; 14 MOG-ON; 31 DSN-ON). At baseline, AQP4-ON group had significantly higher serum GFAP levels than did other groups. In AQP4-ON group, serum GFAP levels were significantly higher in the attack state than in the remission state and correlated with poor visual acuity. As a prognostic indicator, serum BDNF levels were positively correlated with follow-up visual function in the AQP4-ON group (r = 0.726, p = 0.027). Serum GFAP reflected disease status and severity, while serum BDNF was identified as a prognostic biomarker in AQP4-ON. Serum biomarkers are potentially helpful for patients with ON, particularly those with AQP4-ON.

A comparative analysis of demographic, clinical and imaging features of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody positive, aquaporin 4 antibody positive, and double seronegative demyelinating disorders - An Indian tertiary care center prospective study

Objectives

The aim of the study was to study the demographical, clinical, radiological features, and outcome of anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody spectrum disorder and compare these features with patients negative for anti-MOG antibody. MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-related diseases are immunologically distinct pathologies. Our aim was to compare the clinical and radiological features of MOG antibody-related diseases with AQP4 antibody-related diseases and seronegative demyelinating diseases (Non-multiple sclerosis).

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective and cohort study conducted at an apex tertiary care institute in the northern part of India from Jan 2019 to May 2021. We compared clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings of patients with MOGAD, AQP4 antibody-related diseases, and seronegative demyelinating disease.

Results

There were a total of 103 patients - 41 patients of MOGAD, 37 patients of AQP4 antibody-related diseases and 25 seronegative demyelinating disease. Bilateral optic neuritis was the most frequent phenotype in patients with MOGAD (18/41) whereas myelitis was the most common phenotype in the AQP4 (30/37) and seronegative groups (13/25). Cortical, juxtacortical lesions, anterior segment optic neuritis, optic sheath enhancement, and conus involvement in myelitis were radiological findings that separated MOGAD from AQP4 related diseases. Nadir Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual acuity were similar across the groups. Last follow-up EDSS was significantly better in the MOG antibody group as compared to AQP4 antibody group (1 [0-8] vs. 3.5 [0-8]; P = 0.03). Encephalitis, myelitis, and seizures were more common in the younger population (<18 vs. >18 years) in MOGAD (9 vs. 2, P = 0.001; 9 vs. 7, P = 0.03; 6 vs. 0, P = 0.001).

Conclusion

We identified several clinical and radiological features that can help physicians to distinguish MOGAD from AQP4-immunoglobulin G+neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. Differentiation is vital as treatment response might vary among both groups.

Recurrent Optic Neuritis and Perineuritis Followed by an Unexpected Discovery

We describe a woman with a history of relapsing acute optic neuritis and perineuritis. Testing failed to confirm a specific diagnosis; hence, she was diagnosed with seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and treated with the immunotherapy rituximab, later in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil. She achieved a durable remission for 9 years until she presented with paresthesia affecting her left fifth digit, right proximal thigh, and left foot, while also reporting a 25-pound weight loss over the prior 3 months. New imaging demonstrated a longitudinally extensive and enhancing optic nerve, in conjunction with multifocal enhancing lesions within the spinal cord, in a skip-like distribution. The differential diagnosis is discussed.

Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis

There is no consensus regarding the classification of optic neuritis, and precise diagnostic criteria are not available. This reality means that the diagnosis of disorders that have optic neuritis as the first manifestation can be challenging. Accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis at presentation can facilitate the timely treatment of individuals with multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease. Epidemiological data show that, cumulatively, optic neuritis is most frequently caused by many conditions other than multiple sclerosis. Worldwide, the cause and management of optic neuritis varies with geographical location, treatment availability, and ethnic background. We have developed diagnostic criteria for optic neuritis and a classification of optic neuritis subgroups. Our diagnostic criteria are based on clinical features that permit a diagnosis of possible optic neuritis; further paraclinical tests, utilising brain, orbital, and retinal imaging, together with antibody and other protein biomarker data, can lead to a diagnosis of definite optic neuritis. Paraclinical tests can also be applied retrospectively on stored samples and historical brain or retinal scans, which will be useful for future validation studies. Our criteria have the potential to reduce the risk of misdiagnosis, provide information on optic neuritis disease course that can guide future treatment trial design, and enable physicians to judge the likelihood of a need for long-term pharmacological management, which might differ according to optic neuritis subgroups.

Optical Coherence Tomography in Chronic Relapsing Inflammatory Optic Neuropathy, Neuromyelitis Optica and Multiple Sclerosis: A Comparative Study

Purpose: To examine the optical coherence tomography (OCT) features of the retina in patients with chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) and compare them with those of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with and without optic neuritis (ON), and healthy controls (HC). Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we used spectral domain OCT to evaluate the retinal structure of 14 participants with CRION, 22 with NMOSD, 40 with RRMS with unilateral ON, and 20 HC. The peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), total macular volume (TMV), and papillomacular bundle (PMB) were measured, and intra-retinal segmentation was performed to obtain the retinal nerve fiber (RNFL), ganglion cell (GCL), inner plexiform (IPL), inner nuclear (INL), outer plexiform (OPL) and outer nuclear (ONL) layer volumes. Results: The global pRNFL [39.33(±1.8) µm] and all its quadrants are significantly thinner in CRION compared with all other groups (p < 0.05). CRION patients have decreased volumes of TMV, RNFL, GCL, and IPL compared with all other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Severe thinning in pRNFL and thinning in intra-retinal segments of IPL, GCL, RNFL, and TMV could be helpful in differentiating CRION from NMOSD and RRMS.

Disease course of Chronic Relapsing Inflammatory Optic Neuropathy (CRION) in a single care center

BACKGROUND

Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) is a recurrent, idiopathic optic neuritis and is considered as a rare disease.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical course during long-term follow-up of patients with a diagnosis of CRION.

METHODS

From a cohort of 1,735 patients with demyelinating disorders, we selected patients aged over 16 years with CRION according to current criteria. Demographic and clinical data, including initial presentation, symptoms, number of relapses, time delay in diagnosis, diagnostic methods, and treatment were obtained from clinical files. Infections, autoimmune diseases, and multiple sclerosis, among other conditions, were ruled out in all patients.

RESULTS

We analyzed 30 patients with CRION: 24 women and six men, with mean age of 42.8±10.2 years, median disease course of 7.9 years (5.29-13.1), and median number of attacks of 2 (IQR 2-4). The initial manifestation was ocular pain in 97% and bilateral and sequential affection in 87%. Visual acuity was recovered in 50%, did not improve in 33%, and recovered incompletely in 17%. Antibodies against aquaporin-4 (AQP4-Abs) were negative in 73.3%. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was normal in 76.7%. None of the patients evolved to another demyelinating disease over time. Initial treatment was methylprednisolone in 100%, and plasmapheresis in 20%. Currently, all patients are on maintenance treatment with mycophenolate mofetil or rituximab with a decrease in relapsing rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis of CRION is challenging and should be kept in mind. Prompt diagnosis, adequate treatment and close follow-up are essential to prevent disabling sequelae in these patients.

Differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite immense progress of imaging and updates in the MacDonald criteria, the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis remains difficult as it must integrate history, clinical presentation, biological markers, and imaging. There is a multitude of syndromes resembling multiple sclerosis both clinically or on imaging. The goal of this review is to help clinicians orient themselves in these various diagnoses. We organized our review in two categories: inflammatory and autoimmune diseases that are close or can be confused with multiple sclerosis, and non-inflammatory syndromes that can present with symptoms or imaging mimicking those of multiple sclerosis.

METHOD

Review of literature CONCLUSION: Progress of imaging and biological sciences have drastically changed the approach and management of multiple sclerosis. But these developments have also shined a light on a variety of diseases previously unknown or poorly known, therefore greatly expanding the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. While autoimmune, many of these diseases have underlying biological mechanisms that are very different from those of multiple sclerosis, rendering MS therapies usually inefficient. It is crucial to approach these diseases with utmost thoroughness, integrating history, clinical exam, and evolving ancillary tests.

Approach to optic neuritis: An update

Over the past few years, there has been remarkable development in the area of optic neuritis. The discovery of new antibodies has improved our understanding of the pathology of the disease. Antiaquaporin4 antibodies and antimyelin oligodendrocytes antibodies are now considered as distinct entities of optic neuritis with their specific clinical presentation, neuroimaging characteristics, treatment options, and course of the disease. Similarly, there has been a substantial change in the treatment of optic neuritis which was earlier limited to steroids and interferons. The development of new immunosuppressant drugs and monoclonal antibodies has reduced the relapses and improved the prognosis of optic neuritis as well as an associated systemic disease. This review article tends to provide an update on the approach and management of optic neuritis.

Optic neuritis classification in 2021

Optic neuritis (ON) can be associated with inflammatory disease of the central nervous system or can be isolated, with or without relapse. It can also be associated with infectious or systemic disease. These multiple associations based on a variety of clinical, radiological, and biological criteria that have changed over time have led to overlapping phenotypes: a single ON case can be classified in several ways simultaneously or over time. As early, intensive treatment is often required, its diagnosis should be rapid and precise. In this review, we present the current state of knowledge about diagnostic criteria for ON aetiologies in adults and children, we discuss overlapping phenotypes, and we propose a homogeneous classification scheme. Even if distinctions between typical and atypical ON are relevant, their phenotypes are largely overlapping, and clinical criteria are neither sensitive enough, nor specific enough, to assure a diagnosis. For initial cases of ON, clinicians should perform contrast enhanced MRI of the brain and orbits, cerebral spinal fluid analysis, and biological analyses to exclude secondary infectious or inflammatory ON. Systematic screening for MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG IgG is recommended in children but is still a matter of debate in adults. Early recognition of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, MOG-IgG-associated disorder, and chronic relapsing idiopathic optic neuritis is required, as these diagnoses require therapies for relapse prevention that are different from those used to treat multiple sclerosis.

Comparative analysis of immunosuppressive therapies for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis: a cohort study

AIMS

The optimal immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis (MOG-ON) remains uncertain. This study aimed to observe the disease course of MOG-ON and evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of conventional immunosuppressants through Chinese cohort analysis.

METHODS

This bidirectional cohort study included 121 patients with MOG-ON between January 2015 and December 2018. The clinical features and annualised relapse rate (ARR) of patients with and without IST were analysed.

RESULTS

The median age at onset was 17.5 years, and the sex ratio (F:M) was 1.24. Of 121 patients, 77 patients relapsed and 61 patients were younger than 18 years at disease onset. The overall median ARR of 63 patients in the non-IST group was 0.5, with 46.0% patients showing relapse at a median follow-up of 33.5 months. In the IST group, the ARR decreased from 1.75 pre-IST to 0.00 post-IST in 53 patients who received IST exceeding 6 months, with 20.8% patients showing relapse at a median follow-up of 23.8 months. The relapse rates of patients treated with rituximab (RTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were not statistically different, but the rate of discontinuation was significantly lower in the RTX-treated group (18.2% vs 57.7%, p=0.0017).

CONCLUSION

This study provides Class III evidence that both MMF and RTX may lower disease activity in patients with MOG-ON, and RTX showed better tolerability than MMF. However, observation after a single attack remains a good option because less than half of patients not on treatment suffered a relapse.

Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Disease: Current Insights into the Disease Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-associated disease (MOGAD) is a rare, antibody-mediated inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS) with various phenotypes starting from optic neuritis, via transverse myelitis to acute demyelinating encephalomyelitis (ADEM) and cortical encephalitis. Even though sometimes the clinical picture of this condition is similar to the presentation of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), most experts consider MOGAD as a distinct entity with different immune system pathology. MOG is a molecule detected on the outer membrane of myelin sheaths and expressed primarily within the brain, spinal cord and also the optic nerves. Its function is not fully understood but this glycoprotein may act as a cell surface receptor or cell adhesion molecule. The specific outmost location of myelin makes it a potential target for autoimmune antibodies and cell-mediated responses in demyelinating processes. Optic neuritis seems to be the most frequent presenting phenotype in adults and ADEM in children. In adults, the disease course is multiphasic and subsequent relapses increase disability. In children ADEM usually presents as a one-time incident. Luckily, acute immunotherapy is very effective and severe disability (ambulatory and visual) is less frequent than in NMOSD. A critical element of reliable diagnosis is detection of pathogenic serum antibodies MOG with accurate, specific and sensitive methods, preferably with optimized cell-based assay (CBA). MRI imaging can also help in differentiating MOGAD from other neuro-inflammatory disorders. Reports on randomised control trials are limited, but observational open-label experience suggests a role for high-dose steroids and plasma exchange in the treatment of acute attacks, and for immunosuppressive therapies, such as steroids, oral immunosuppressants and rituximab as maintenance treatment. In this review, we present up-to-date clinical, immunological, radiographic, histopathological data concerning MOGAD and summarize the practical aspects of diagnosing and managing patients with this disease.

Differences in Clinical Features of Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Associated Optic Neuritis in White and Asian Race

PURPOSE

To determine whether clinical features and visual outcomes of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated optic neuritis (MOG-ON) differ between White and Asian subjects.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort.

METHODS

This was a multicenter study of 153 subjects who were White or Asian with a history of adult-onset (age 18 years or older) optic neuritis (ON) and positive MOG-IgG serology by cell-based assay. Subjects were enrolled from 2 unpublished cohorts (January 2017-November 2019) and 9 published cohorts with case-level data available (2012-2018). Subjects with alternative etiologies of demyelinating disease and positive or lack of aquaporin-4-IgG serology result were excluded. The main outcome measurements were clinical features and final visual outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the 153 subjects who were White (n = 80) or Asian (n = 73) included in the study, 93 (61%) were women, mean age of onset was 40.8 ± 14.9 years, and median follow-up was 35.2 months (range: 1-432 months); all of these characteristics were similar between White and Asian subjects. White subjects were more likely to have recurrent ON (57 [71%] vs 20 [27%]; P = .001) and extra-optic nerve manifestations (35 [44%] vs 8 [11%]; P = .001). Optic disc swelling, neuroimaging findings, presenting visual acuity (VA), treatment, and final VA did not differ according to subjects' race. Despite the high prevalence of severe visual loss (<20/200) during nadir, most subjects had good recovery of VA (>20/40) at final examination (51/77 [66%] White subjects vs 52/70 [74%] Asian subjects).

CONCLUSION

White subjects with MOG-ON were more likely to have recurrent disease and extra-optic nerve manifestations. Visual outcomes were similar between White and Asian subjects.

Neuromyelitis optica

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO; also known as Devic syndrome) is a clinical syndrome characterized by attacks of acute optic neuritis and transverse myelitis. In most patients, NMO is caused by pathogenetic serum IgG autoantibodies to aquaporin 4 (AQP4), the most abundant water-channel protein in the central nervous system. In a subset of patients negative for AQP4-IgG, pathogenetic serum IgG antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, an antigen in the outer myelin sheath of central nervous system neurons, are present. Other causes of NMO (such as paraneoplastic disorders and neurosarcoidosis) are rare. NMO was previously associated with a poor prognosis; however, treatment with steroids and plasma exchange for acute attacks and with immunosuppressants (in particular, B cell-depleting agents) for attack prevention has greatly improved the long-term outcomes. Recently, a number of randomized controlled trials have been completed and the first drugs, all therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, have been approved for the treatment of AQP4-IgG-positive NMO and its formes frustes.

MRI characteristics of MOG-Ab associated disease in adults: An update

Our knowledge of the radiological spectrum of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease (MOGAD) is growing rapidly. An update on the radiological features of the disease, and its evolution is thus necessary. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an increasingly important role in the differential diagnosis of MOGAD particularly from aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-NMOSD), and multiple sclerosis (MS). Differentiating these conditions is of prime importance because the management is different between the three inflammatory diseases, and thus could prevent further attack-related disability. Therefore, identifying the MRI features suggestive of MOGAD has diagnostic and prognostic implications. We herein review optic nerve, spinal cord and the brain MRI findings from MOGAD adult patients, and compare them to AQP4-NMOSD and MS.

[Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin G-associated encephalomyelitis]

The article discusses the role of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein immunoglobulin G (MOG-IgG) in demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system. Clinical phenotypes of demyelinating syndromes associated with MOG-IgG that are currently included into neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are described. However, it has been shown that encephalomyelitis associated with MOG-IgG (MOG-EM) has certain clinical, radiological, immunological and histopathological features that make it possible to single out these syndromes into a separate nosological form. We provide International recommendations that establish indications for testing MOG-IgG using cell-based assay. We discuss epidemiological issues and classification challenges of the disease. Various approaches to treatment and prevention of relapses of MOG-EM are analyzed.

Acute Management of Optic Neuritis: An Evolving Paradigm

The current management of acute optic neuritis (ON) is focused on expediting visual recovery through the use of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids. The recent identification of specific autoantibodies associated with central nervous system inflammatory disorders has provided novel insights into immune targets and mechanisms that impact the prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of ON. Therefore, neurologists and ophthalmologists need to be aware of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings that may provide important clues to the etiology of ON and the potential need for aggressive management. Moving forward, rapid and accurate diagnosis of inflammatory ON will likely be critical for implementing clinical care that optimizes short-term and long-term therapeutic outcomes.

Update on Pediatric Optic Neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an update on advances in the understanding of pediatric demyelinating optic neuritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past decade, the disease phenotypes for demyelinating syndromes in children have been more clearly defined. Pediatric optic neuritis may present as a clinically isolated syndrome or in the setting of underlying neurologic disease. In addition to optic neuritis associated with multiple sclerosis or neuromyelitis optica, recent work has identified antibodies to the myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG IgG) as a unique demyelinating cause with distinct features regarding treatment and prognosis. The disease phenotypes for demyelinating pediatric optic neuritis have expanded. Treatment strategies vary and are not universally effective for each cause of demyelinating disease. Accurately distinguishing among these unique clinical syndromes is therefore critical for initiation of appropriate treatment to prevent disability, to maximize visual outcomes, and to provide insight into long-term prognosis.

Optic Neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the clinical presentation, evaluation, and management of the patient with optic neuritis. Initial emphasis is placed on clinical history, examination, diagnostic testing, and medical decision making, while subsequent focus is placed on examining specific inflammatory optic neuropathies. Clinical clues, examination findings, neuroimaging, and laboratory testing that differentiate autoimmune, granulomatous, demyelinating, infectious, and paraneoplastic causes of optic neuritis are assessed, and current treatments are evaluated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in technology and immunology have enhanced our understanding of the pathologies driving inflammatory optic nerve injury. Clinicians are now able to interrogate optic nerve structure and function during inflammatory injury, rapidly identify disease-relevant autoimmune targets, and deliver timely therapeutics to improve visual outcomes.

SUMMARY

Optic neuritis is a common clinical manifestation of central nervous system inflammation. Depending on the etiology, visual prognosis and the risk for recurrent injury may vary. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis may be critical for limiting vision loss, future neurologic disability, and organ damage. This article will aid neurologists in formulating a systematic approach to patients with optic neuritis.

Brain Atrophy in Relapsing Optic Neuritis Is Associated With Crion Phenotype

Background and objective: Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis (CRION) is one of the more common phenotypes related to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Abs). The absence of specific biomarkers makes distinguishing between CRION and relapsing inflammatory ON (RION) difficult. A recent work has suggested a widespread affectation of the central nervous system in CRION patients. In order to search for a potential CRION marker we have measured brain atrophy in a cohort of patients, stratified by phenotypes: CRION, RION, multiple sclerosis with a history of optic neuritis (MS-ON), and MOG-Abs status. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 31 patients (seven CRION, 11 RION, and 13 MS-ON). All patients were tested for MOG and aquaporin-4 antibodies (AQ4-Abs). Clinical data were collected. Brain atrophy was calculated by measuring the brain parenchyma fraction (BPF) with Neuroquant® software. Results: Four of seven CRION patients and one of 11 RION patients were positive for MOG-Abs (p = 0.046) and no MS-ON patients tested positive to MOG-Abs. All patients were negative to AQ4-Abs. The BPF was lower in patients with CRION than patients with RION (70.6 vs. 75.3%, p = 0.019) and similar to that in MS-ON patients. Conclusions: Brain atrophy in idiopathic inflammatory relapsing ON is present in patients with the CRION phenotype. Data from this study reflect that the optic nerve is a main target involved in these patients but not the only one. Our results should be further investigated in comprehensive and prospective studies.

Aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in immune-mediated optic neuritis at long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To re-evaluate serum samples from our 2007 cohort of patients with single-episode isolated ON (SION), recurrent isolated ON (RION), chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION), multiple sclerosis-associated ON (MSON) and neuromyelitis optica (NMO).

METHODS

We re-screened 103/114 patients with available serum on live cell-based assays (CBA) for aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-M23-IgG and myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-α1-IgG. Further testing included oligoclonal bands, serum levels of glial fibrillar acidic and neurofilament proteins and S100B. We show the impact of updated serology on these patients.

RESULTS

Reanalysis of our original cohort revealed that AQP4-IgG seropositivity increased from 56% to 75% for NMO, 5% to 22% for CRION, 6% to 7% for RION, 0% to 7% for MSON and 5% to 6% for SION. MOG-IgG1 was identified in 25% of RION, 25% of CRION, 10% of SION, 0% of MSON and 0% of NMO. As a result, patients have been reclassified incorporating their autoantibody status. Presenting visual acuity was significantly worse in patients who were AQP4-IgG seropositive (p=0.034), but there was no relationship between antibody seropositivity and either ON relapse rate or visual acuity outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients with seronegative CRION and RION has decreased due to improved detection of autoantibodies over the past decade. It remains essential that the clinical phenotype guides both antibody testing and clinical management. Careful monitoring of the disease course is key when considering whether to treat with prophylactic immune suppression.

Clinical Features of the Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Introduction

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory, demyelinating syndrome of the central nervous system (CNS) that predominantly affects the spinal cord and optic nerves. Since it was first described, new information about the pathophysiology gained momentum with the discovery of an antibody against Aquaporin-4, a water channel protein that is predominantly found in the astrocytes. In our study, we evaluated the clinical features of NMOSD and clinically related CNS disorders.

Method

In our study, we recruited patients that were followed by Clinic for Multiple Sclerosis and Myelin Disorders at Istanbul University between 1979 and 2016.

Results

Thirty-five NMOSD, fifteen relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (RION) and ten opticospinal multiple sclerosis (OSMS) patients were recruited in our study. Forty-eight patients (%80) were female and twelve (%20) were male. Age, sex, follow-up period, annualized relapse rate, relapses in the first two years and progression index were similar between the groups. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein levels were higher in the NMOSD group. Concomitant autoimmune disorders were observed in six NMOSD patients and two OSMS patients. One patient with RION had nonspecific white matter lesions without gadolinium enhancement in the brain MRI.

Conclusion

Laboratory and imaging findings suggests that NMOSD is a distinct disorder than RION and OSMS. Further studies are needed to say specific comments about the existence of OSMS.

[MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing]

Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM ("red flags") that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation, and propose for the first time diagnostic criteria for MOG-EM.

Different Characteristics of Aquaporin-4 and Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Seropositive Male Optic Neuritis in China

Purpose

To describe different clinical characteristics and prognosis of optic neuritis (ON) in male patients with seropositive aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-Ab) or myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-Ab) in China.

Method

Males with ON were recruited from the Neuro-ophthalmology Department of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, General Hospital from January 2016 to February 2018. They were assigned to two groups based on antibodies status: MOG-Ab-seropositive ON (MOG-ON) and aquaporin-4 Ab-seropositive ON (AQP4-ON).

Results

Seventy-six male patients were assessed, including 44 MOG-ON (57.9%) and 32 AQP4-ON (42.1%). The MOG-ON patients were significantly younger at onset compared to the AQP4-ON group (p < 0.001). Frequencies of optic disc swelling, presence of abnormal autoimmune antibodies, and elevated levels of CSF IgG were significantly higher in the AQP4-ON group than the MOG-ON group (p=0.040, p=0.016, and p=0.10, respectively). At the final visit, 85.3% of MOG-ON eyes had increased visual acuity (≥0.5) compared to 35.1% of AQP4-ON eyes (p < 0.001). The ratio of this steroid-dependent condition is higher in MOG-ON patients than the AQP4-ON group (p < 0.001). The ratio of conversion to NMO is higher in the AQP4-ON group than the MOG-ON group, with more AQP4-ON patients developing NMO by the follow-up (p=0.012). MOG-ON patients had thicker average peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layers and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform than AQP4-ON patients (p=0.008 and p=0.012, respectively). Orbital MRI revealed more AQP4-ON patients had chiasmal involvement than MOG-ON patients (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Male MOG-ON patients had different clinical features including earlier age of onset, higher optic disc swelling ratio, better visual acuity recovery, thicker peripapillary retinal nerve fiber and macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layers, and less chiasmal involvement than male AQP4-ON patients. Serum antibody may be a potential biomarker for determining visual prognosis in male ON.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-seropositive optic neuritis in varying age groups: A cohort study in China

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-seropositive optic neuritis (MOG-ON) in patients with varying ages of onset in China.

METHODS

Patients displaying symptoms of MOG-ON were recruited from the Neuro-ophthalmology Department in the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from January 2016 to May 2018. They were assigned to one of three subgroups based on age of onset: pediatric (<18 years), young (18-46 years), and middle-aged (>46 years) MOG-ON.

RESULTS

110 patients (188 eyes) were assessed, including 58 pediatric (52.7%), 34 young (30.9%), and 18 middle-aged (16.4%) patients. Of the pediatric patients, 93.9% had good recovery of visual acuity (≥0.5) compared with 79.7% of young patients and 66.7% of middle-aged patients (p < .001). The annual relapse rate was lower in the pediatric group than young and middle-aged groups (0.32 ± 0.50 vs 0.73 ± 0.87 vs 0.49 ± 1.08, p = .036). Six children (10.3%) were diagnosed with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, while seven young patients (20.6%) were diagnosed with aquaporin-4 antibody seronegative neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder upon follow-up. The average peripapillary RNFL and macular GCIPL thicknesses were not statistically different between subgroups (p = .996, p = .608). Overall, MRIs of the optic nerve showed perineural enhancement in 52.0% of patients and longitudinal extensive involvement in 87.7%. MRIs also revealed a greater proportion of pediatric patients with intracranial optic nerve involvement than in the other two subgroups (45.4% vs. 21.2% vs. 36.7%, p = .014).

CONCLUSION

Pediatric ON was the most common MOG-ON subgroup. Pediatric patients had different clinical features, including better recovery of visual acuity, lower annual relapse rate, and more intracranial optic nerve involvement than young and middle-aged patients. Additionally, age of onset may be a potential predictor for determining visual prognosis with MOG-ON.

Antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the status of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG) in chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) and investigate its different clinical characteristics and prognosis.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with CRION were recruited by the Neuro-ophthalmology Department of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from December 2015 to April 2017. Based on antibody status, they were assigned to either the MOG-CRION or seronegative-CRION groups.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients (38 eyes) were assessed and divided into the following groups: 22 (66.7%) MOG-CRION and 11 (33.3%) seronegative-CRION. The ratio of female to male was 1:1, and 81.8% of total CRION patients were adults (≥18 years). A total of 29 eyes (76.3%) showed severe visual loss (<20/200) during the first optic neuritis episode, and 37 eyes (72.5%) demonstrated good visual recovery (>20/40) during the final follow-up. The mean onset age of MOG-CRION patients was 28 ± 16 years (range 6-62), which was significantly younger than that of seronegative-CRION (45 ± 12 years, range 22-59) (p=0.029). The intraorbital and canalicular segments were highly involved in the orbital MRI of CRION patients. During the final follow-up, MOG-CRION patients had more bilateral involvement (p=0.008) and higher annualised relapse rates compared with the seronegative-CRION patients (p=0.019).

CONCLUSION

CRION was predominantly found in adults with unilateral ON and exhibited a higher rate of seropositive MOG-IgG. MOG-CRION, which may be a disparate subtype of MOG-IgG-induced demyelinating disease that needs further investigation, was found in younger patients at onset, with more bilateral involvement and more relapse tendency.

Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody-Positive Optic Neuritis: Clinical Characteristics, Radiologic Clues, and Outcome

PURPOSE

To characterize the clinical phenotype of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (MOG-IgG) optic neuritis.

DESIGN

Observational case series.

METHODS

Setting: Multicenter. Patient/Study Population: Subjects meeting inclusion criteria: (1) history of optic neuritis; (2) seropositivity (MOG-IgG binding index > 2.5); 87 MOG-IgG-seropositive patients with optic neuritis were included (Mayo Clinic, 76; other medical centers, 11). MOG-IgG was detected using full-length MOG-transfected live HEK293 cells in a clinically validated flow cytometry assay.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical and radiologic characteristics and visual outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven percent were female and median age at onset was 31 (range 2-79) years. Median number of optic neuritis attacks was 3 (range 1-8), median follow-up 2.9 years (range 0.5-24 years), and annualized relapse rate 0.8. Average visual acuity (VA) at nadir of worst attack was count fingers. Average final VA was 20/30; for 5 patients (6%) it was ≤20/200 in either eye. Optic disc edema and pain each occurred in 86% of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging showed perineural enhancement in 50% and longitudinally extensive involvement in 80%. Twenty-six patients (30%) had recurrent optic neuritis without other neurologic symptoms, 10 (12%) had single optic neuritis, 14 (16%) had chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy, and 36 (41%) had optic neuritis with other neurologic symptoms (most neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-like phenotype or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis). Only 1 patient was diagnosed with MS (MOG-IgG-binding index 2.8; normal range ≤ 2.5). Persistent MOG-IgG seropositivity occurred in 61 of 62 (98%). A total of 61% received long-term immunosuppressant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Manifestations of MOG-IgG-positive optic neuritis are diverse. Despite recurrent attacks with severe vision loss, the majority of patients have significant recovery and retain functional vision long-term.

Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION): a manifestation of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies

Background

Key clinical features of chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) include relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis (ON) and steroid dependency, both of which have been reported among patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-Abs). We investigated the relevance of the presence of serum MOG-IgG with the current diagnostic criteria for CRION among patients with idiopathic inflammatory optic neuritis (iON).

Methods

Retrospective reviews of a database prospectively collated between 2011 and 2017 from the tertiary referral center for multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica were performed. Sixty-four patients with iON, who did not meet the diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder with/without NMO-IgG, or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and who had no symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) lesions other than on the optic nerve, were included from a cohort of 615 patients with inflammatory demyelinating diseases of the CNS. Fulfillment of the current diagnostic criteria for CRION, assay results for the serum IgG1 MOG-Ab, and characteristics of CRION patients with MOG-IgG were compared to those of non-CRION patients with MOG-IgG.

Results

Twelve iON patients fulfilled the current diagnostic criteria for CRION, 11 patients were positive for MOG-IgG, and one patient was borderline. Among the other 52 iON patients not meeting the criteria for CRION, 14 had relapsing disease courses and 38 had monophasic courses, of which MOG-IgG positivity were 0% and 29%, respectively. CRION patients with MOG-IgG had more relapsing disease courses (first steroid-dependent worsening/relapse in 2.3 months, range 0.4–7.0) and poorer optical coherence tomography outcomes at follow-up than non-CRION patients with MOG-IgG. However, patients in the two groups did not differ in terms of age of onset, sex, or steroid treatment duration after initial attack.

Conclusions

CRION, according to the current diagnostic criteria, is a relapsing optic neuritis associated with MOG-IgG. Among iON patients with MOG-IgG, the absence of steroid-dependent attacks in the early stages of the disease may predict a long-term non-relapsing disease course and a more favorable outcome.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-018-1335-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Central serous chorioretinopathy as a cause of vision loss in chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy

Purpose

Chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) is a type of idiopathic recurrent optic neuritis that responds to systemic corticosteroids and relapses on steroid withdrawal or dose reduction. Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) is often associated with glucocorticoid therapy. This paper aims to highlight CSCR as a cause of visual loss in patients being treated with corticosteroids for optic neuritis.

Observations

We describe the case of a 42-year-old woman with a history of CRION in her left eye who presented with painful vision loss in the right eye and diffuse right optic disc edema. Steroid therapy was initiated, leading to visual and perimetric improvement. Two months later however, the patient returned with painless visual loss, now related to CSCR. Despite oral steroids being continued, there was spontaneous tomographic and visual recovery after four months.

Conclusions and importance

We believe this is the first report of CSCR causing vision loss in a patient with CRION treated with oral corticosteroids. CSCR should be suspected in patients with optic neuritis of any cause who develop vision loss while on treatment with steroids.

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes and Predictive Factors in Optic Neuritis

Background:

The causes, clinical presentations and treatment outcomes of optic neuritis are distinct among different populations. Early diagnosis based on clinical presentations plays an important role in treating optic neuritis patients.

Objective:

The study aimed to determine clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes and predictive factors of treatment outcomes in optic neuritis patients with and without demyelinating disease.

Methods:

A retrospective descriptive study of optic neuritis patients carried out between January 2009 and December 2016 was done. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the predictive factors of treatment outcomes.

Results:

Among 150 patients with optic neuritis, 58 patients were diagnosed with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disease (NMOSD), 23 patients were diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (MS) and 69 patients were idiopathic. The age at presentation in the NMOSD group was significantly younger than the MS group and the idiopathic group. The female:male ratio was significantly lower in the idiopathic group than in the NMOSD group. The initial Best Corrected Visual Activity (BCVA) of 20/20-20/60 (p = 0.001) and the idiopathic group (p =0.030) was associated with good visual outcomes. Initial BCVA of < 20/200 (p = 0.009) and the NMOSD group (p < 0.001) was associated with poor visual outcomes.

Conclusion:

NMOSD is a more common cause of optic neuritis than MS in Thai population. Female patients with poor initial VA, poor response to steroids treatment, and presenting recurrent attacks are highly suspicious for NMOSD. Optic neuritis without associated demyelinating disease has a better visual outcome and lower recurrence rate.

Clinical presentation of optic neuritis with autoantibodies anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein

Purpose:

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein autoantibodies are associated with certain optic neuritis. Little data are known about the specificity of the initial ophthalmologic presentation.

Methods:

A monocentric retrospective study (2013–2017) of all patients diagnosed with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein+ optic neuritis in a tertiary ophthalmologic unit was conducted. The primary objective was to define the clinical ophthalmologic description of the first episode. The secondary objective was to evaluate the evolution and final diagnosis.

Results:

A total of nine patients were included. There was no female predominance (sex ratio f/m = 0.8). At the first optic neuritis episode, the average age was 39.3 years (17–67 years, standard deviation: 18.4). Initial visual acuity was low (+1.07logMAR, standard deviation: 0.77); 5 eyes out of 15 had visual acuity +2logMAR or worse. Optic neuritis was mostly painful (8/9) and bilateral (6/9) but asymmetric. Optic disk swelling was reported in 9/15 eyes and 7/9 patients and was significantly associated with lower visual acuity in the acute phase (+1.46logMAR, standard deviation: 0.67 vs +0.5, standard deviation: 0.55; p = 0.03). After a mean observation period of 3.3 years (0.6–9.4 years, standard deviation: 3.4), median visual acuity was 0.05logMAR. All five patients were followed up for more than 1 year (5.4 years, standard deviation: 3.2) had 3–8 relapses (mean: 4.4, standard deviation: 2.1; annualized relapse rate: 1.2, standard deviation: 0.9). Final diagnosis was chronic relapsing idiopathic optic neuritis (n = 4), clinically isolated optic neuritis (n = 3), and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder aquaporin 4– (n = 2).

Conclusion:

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein+ optic neuritis has an atypical clinical presentation compared with multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder aquaporin 4+. Its evolution is closer to neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder aquaporin 4+, with a better visual outcome.

Recurrent Optic Neuritis as the Initial Symptom in Demyelinating Diseases

Background and Purpose

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammation of the optic nerve that can be recurrent, with unilateral or bilateral presentation. Diagnosing recurrent cases may be challenging. We aimed to compare patients with recurrent ON as their initial symptom according to their following final diagnoses: multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), or chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION).

Methods

The medical records of patients with initial recurrent ON who were followed at the Neuroimmunology Clinic of the Federal University of São Paulo between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were classified according to their final diagnosis into MS, NMOSD, or CRION, and the characteristics of these groups were compared to identify predictive factors.

Results

Thirty-three patients with recurrent ON were included, and 6, 14, and 13 had final diagnoses of MS, NMOSD, and CRION, respectively. Most of the patients were female with unilateral and severe ON in their first episode, and the initial Visual Functional System Score (VFSS) was ≥5 in 63.6%, 85.7%, and 16.7% of the patients with CRION, NMOSD, and MS, respectively. Anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies were detected in 9 of 21 (42.8%) tested patients. Seven of nine (77.8%) seropositive NMOSD patients experienced transverse myelitis episodes during the follow-up period. A multivariate regression analysis showed that the VFSS at the last medical appointment predicted the final diagnosis.

Conclusions

A lower VFSS at the last medical appointment was predictive of MS. Patients with NMOSD and CRION have similar clinical characteristics, whereas NMOSD patients tend to have worse visual acuity.

MOG encephalomyelitis: international recommendations on diagnosis and antibody testing

Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM ("red flags") that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides a practical approach for providers caring for patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders. Clinical and imaging features, diagnostic criteria, treatment of acute exacerbations, chronic preventive therapy, and symptom management in NMO spectrum disorders are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The rapid pace of research in NMO spectrum disorders has led to many recent advances. A broader understanding of the clinical spectrum of the disease as well as improvements in anti-aquaporin-4 antibody assays have led to recent revision of the diagnostic criteria. Several recent studies have expanded the knowledge base regarding the efficacy and safety of current therapies for NMO spectrum disorders.

SUMMARY

An NMO spectrum disorder is an inflammatory disorder affecting the central nervous system, previously thought to be closely related to multiple sclerosis but more recently demonstrated to represent a distinct clinical and pathophysiologic entity. As NMO spectrum disorders carry significant morbidity and, at times, mortality, prompt and accurate diagnosis followed by swift initiation of therapy for both treatment of acute exacerbations and prevention of further relapses is critical. This article provides a practical approach to the diagnosis and management of NMO spectrum disorders.

Baseline demographics, clinical features, and treatment protocols of 240 patients with optic neuropathy: experiences from a neuro-ophthalmological clinic in the Aegean region of Turkey

PURPOSE

To analyze the demographic patterns, clinical characteristics, and treatment protocols of optic neuropathies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The hospital data of patients with optic neuropathy admitted to the Department of Neuro-ophthalmology in a tertiary referral center in Turkey between January 2010 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic patterns, clinical features, treatment protocols, and the natural disease courses were assessed.

RESULTS

The total number of patients with optic neuropathy seen over this period was 240, which consist of 43 with idiopathic optic neuritis (17.9%), 40 with multiple sclerosis-related optic neuritis (16.7%), 12 with chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis (5.0%), 12 with atypical optic neuritis (5.0%), 11 with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders-related optic neuritis (4.6%), 90 with non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (37.5%), 4 with arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (1.7%), 10 with traumatic optic neuropathy (4.1%), 6 with compressive optic neuropathy (2.5%), and 12 with mitochondrial optic neuropathy [9 with toxic optic neuropathy (3.7%) and 3 with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (1.2%)]. There were 101 males (42%) and 139 females (58%). The mean age was 43.34 ± 15.86 years.

CONCLUSION

This study reported the demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment protocols of optic neuropathies in a neuro-ophthalmology specialty clinic at a tertiary referral center in Turkey during the past decade. The data may be useful in assessing the global status of optic neuropathies.