Plasma exchange response in 34 patients with severe optic neuritis

Prognostic factors of first-onset optic neuritis based on diagnostic criteria and antibody status: a multicentre analysis of 427 eyes

BACKGROUND

Optic neuritis (ON) prognosis is influenced by various factors including attack severity, underlying aetiologies, treatments and consequences of previous episodes. This study, conducted on a large cohort of first ON episodes, aimed to identify unique prognostic factors for each ON subtype, while excluding any potential influence from pre-existing sequelae.

METHODS

Patients experiencing their first ON episodes, with complete aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody testing, and clinical data for applying multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnostic criteria, were enrolled. 427 eyes from 355 patients from 10 hospitals were categorised into four subgroups: neuromyelitis optica with AQP4 IgG (NMOSD-ON), MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD-ON), ON in MS (MS-ON) or idiopathic ON (ION). Prognostic factors linked to complete recovery (regaining 20/20 visual acuity (VA)) or moderate recovery (regaining 20/40 VA) were assessed through multivariable Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

VA at nadir emerged as a robust prognostic factor for both complete and moderate recovery, spanning all ON subtypes. Early intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) was associated with enhanced complete recovery in NMOSD-ON and MOGAD-ON, but not in MS-ON or ION. Interestingly, in NMOSD-ON, even a slight IVMP delay in IVMP by >3 days had a significant negative impact, whereas a moderate delay up to 7-9 days was permissible in MOGAD-ON. Female sex predicted poor recovery in MOGAD-ON, while older age hindered moderate recovery in NMOSD-ON and ION.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive multicentre analysis on first-onset ON unveils subtype-specific prognostic factors. These insights will assist tailored treatment strategies and patient counselling for ON.

Comparison of efficacy of plasma exchange versus intravenous immunoglobulin as an add-on therapy in acute attacks of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

INTRODUCTION

Plasma exchange (PE) is considered a Category II option for the treatment of acute attacks and relapse cases of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). However, neurologists are also considering intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) as an add-on therapy for this disorder.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PE in acute attacks of NMOSD when compared with IVIg, in terms of improvement in the Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) and activities of daily living (ADL) scale score and levels of anti-Aquaporin P4 (AQP4) antibody in seropositive patients.

METHODS

We enrolled 43 NMOSD patients in two groups: Group 1 (n = 29) received steroids and PE, and Group 2 (n = 14) received steroids with IVIg. The baseline EDSS and ADL scores were recorded and compared with scores at the end of therapy, 4 weeks, and 3 months after. Also, anti-AQP4 antibody was measured at baseline and post-therapy in seropositive patients of both groups.

RESULTS

We observed a significant difference in EDSS (p = 0.00) and ADL score (p = 0.00) at day 10 and 3 months in both groups. However, no significant difference in EDSS, as well as ADL score from baseline (p = 0.83; p = 0.25) to 3 months (p = 0.85; p = 0.19), was observed when delta change of score at 3 months was compared across the two groups (p = 0.39; p = 0.52). We observed improved visual acuity in both groups with mild improvement in findings of magnetic resonance imaging at 3 months. We observed a significant decline in AQP4 antibody concentration (at day 10) in group 1 seropositive patients (p = 0.013) with improved EDSS (p = 0.027) and ADL scores (p = 0.026) of these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

PE should be considered as a choice of an add-on therapy in anti-AQP4 antibody-positive NMOSD patients compared with IVIg as it is more effective in reducing antibody concentrations.

The Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis

Despite the high incidence of optic neuritis (ON), and the growing number of therapeutic options for the long-term treatment of diseases associated with ON including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and MOG antibody associated disease (MOGAD), there are still only limited therapeutic options for treating an acute event of optic neuritis. These include steroids, plasma exchange (PLEX) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). High-dose steroids remain the mainstay of acute treatment. However, evidence is emerging that when optic neuritis is accompanied with certain atypical features that suggest a more unfavorable outcome this mandates special consideration such as early addition of other therapeutic agents or tapering the steroid very slowly. This review will distinguish between typical and atypical neuritis and discuss acute treatment options.

Systematic Review of Treatment Options and Therapeutic Responses for Lesions of the Sella and Orbit: Evidence-Based Recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit are rare but require prompt diagnosis to initiate effective treatment. Because uniform recommendations for treatment are currently lacking, we performed an evidence-based review to identify recommendations.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify papers evaluating treatment of inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit. We used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to define recommendations, specifically examining aggregated sample sizes, disease-specific patient follow-up, and clinical trials focused on inflammatory diseases of the sella and orbit.

RESULTS

A total of 169 studies were included and organized by disease pathology. Treatments for various pathologies were recorded. Treatment options included surgery, radiation, steroids, targeted treatments, immunomodulators, intravenous immune globulin, and plasmapheresis. Steroids were the most often employed treatment, second-line management options and timing varied. Pathological diagnosis was highly associated with treatment used. Most evidence were level 3 without available control groups, except for 13 trials in neuromyelitis optica with level 1 or 2 evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evidence-based review to provide recommendations on specific treatments for pathologies of the orbit and sella. The reported data may be useful to help guide randomized clinical trials and provide resource for clinical management decisions based on the available evidence.

Treatment and Relapse Prevention of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory condition involving the optic nerve. Several important typical and atypical ON variants are now recognized. Typical ON has a more favorable prognosis; it can be idiopathic or represent an early manifestation of demyelinating diseases, mostly multiple sclerosis (MS). The atypical spectrum includes entities such as antibody-driven ON associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), chronic/relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION), and sarcoidosis-associated ON. Appropriate and timely diagnosis is essential to rapidly decide on the appropriate treatment, maximize visual recovery, and minimize recurrences. This review paper aims at presenting the currently available state-of-the-art treatment strategies for typical and atypical ON, both in the acute phase and in the long-term. Moreover, emerging therapeutic approaches and novel steps in the direction of achieving remyelination are discussed.

Efficacy of Plasma Exchange Treatment for Demyelinating Optic Neuritis Associated with Various Serum Antibodies: A Prospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the value of plasma exchange (PE) for patients with three subtypes of demyelinating optic neuritis (ON): aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-positive ON (AQP4-ON), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-positive ON (MOG-ON), and AQP4 and MOG double-antibody-seronegative ON (D-ON).

METHODS

A single-center prospective study compared the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at most severe onset, 1 day before intravenous high-dose methylprednisolone (IVMP) treatment, 1 day before PE treatment, after five-cycles of PE therapy, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up visits. The proportions of eyes in each visual outcome category were also compared. Logistic regression and a receiver operating characteristic curve were used to analyze predicted factors for VA improvement.

RESULTS

A total of 124 ON attacks of 122 patients were included. No significant differences were found in BCVA (P = 0.659) before and after PE therapy for 22 D-ON attacks, but VA improved in two of six MOG-ON patients. In 95 AQP4-ON patients suffering 96 attacks, the mean logMAR BCVA markedly improved and was steadily maintained after five-cycles of PE treatments (adjusted P < 0.001), with VA exhibiting a significantly increasing trend (adjusted P = 0.001) after PE treatment. The combination of the number of previous ON episodes and the time window to PE treatment showed accuracy of 74.7% for predicting an improvement in BCVA score ≥ 2 levels. In addition, a combination of logMAR VA before PE and the time window to PE treatment resulted in 83.4% accuracy in predicting whether VA would regain 1.0 logMAR.

CONCLUSION

PE therapy effectively improves visual outcomes for AQP4-ON patients, but offers limited value for D-ON patients. Early initiation greatly increases likelihood of achieving VA improvement.

Optic Neuritis in the Era of NMOSD and MOGAD: A Survey of Practice Patterns in Singapore

PURPOSE

The Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial was a landmark study with implications worldwide. In the advent of antibody testing for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disease (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), emerging concepts, such as routine antibody testing and management, remain controversial, resulting mostly from studies in White populations. We evaluate the practice patterns of optic neuritis investigation and management by neuro-ophthalmologists and neurologists in Singapore.

DESIGN

21-question online survey consisting of 4 clinical vignettes.

METHODS

The survey was sent to all Singapore Medical Council- registered ophthalmologists and neurologists who regularly manage patients with optic neuritis.

RESULTS

Forty-two recipients (17 formally trained neuro-ophthalmol-ogists [100% response rate] and 25 neurologists) responded. Participants opted for routine testing of anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies (88.1% in mild optic neuritis and 97.6% in severe optic neuritis). Anti-MOG antibodies were frequently obtained (76.2% in mild and 88.1% in severe optic neuritis). Plasmapheresis was rapidly initiated (85.7%) in cases of nonresponse to intravenous steroids, even before obtaining anti-aquaporin-4 or anti-MOG serology results. In both NMOSD and MOGAD, oral mycophenolate mofetil was the preferred option if chronic immunosuppression was necessary. Steroids were given for a longer duration and tapered more gradually than in idiopathic optic neuritis cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Serological testing for NMOSD and MOGAD is considered as a routine procedure in cases of optic neuritis in Singapore, possibly due to local epidemiological features of these conditions. Chronic oral immunosuppression is preferred for the long term, but further research is necessary to establish the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these practices.

What's new in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder treatment?

Optic neuritis, an optic nerve inflammatory disease presenting with acute unilateral or bilateral visual loss, is one of the core symptoms of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The diagnosis of NMOSD-related optic neuritis is challenging, and it is mainly based on clinical presentation, optical coherence tomography, magnetic resonance imaging scans, and the status of serum aquaporin-4 antibodies. In the pathogenesis, aquaporin-4 antibodies target astrocytes in the optic nerves, spinal cord and some specific regions of the brain eliciting a devastating autoimmune response. Current pharmacological interventions are directed against various steps within the immunological response, notably the terminal complement system, B-cells, and the pro-inflammatory cytokine Interleukin 6 (IL6). Conventional maintenance therapies were off-label uses of the unspecific immunosuppressants azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil as well as the CD20 specific antibody rituximab and the IL6 receptor specific antibody tocilizumab. Recently, four phase III clinical trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the three novel biologics eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab. These monoclonal antibodies are directed against the complement system, CD19 B-cells and the IL6 receptor, respectively. All three have been approved for NMOSD in the US and several other countries worldwide and thus provide convincing treatment options.

Efficacy and safety of plasma exchange or immunoadsorption for the treatment of option neuritis in demyelinating diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There are no systematic reviews yet that evaluated the effects of PE/IA in patients with optic neuritis (ON) in demyelinating diseases. A meta-analysis of available study is needed to further explore the value of plasma exchange (PE) or immunoadsorption (IA) in treating ON in demyelinating diseases.

METHODS

All relevant articles published on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP Database, Wanfang, Sinomed and ophthalmology professional websites were searched. Study characteristics, demographic characteristics, clinical features and outcome measures were extracted. Response rate, adverse events (AE) rate, serious adverse event (SAE) rate, the log of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), visual outcome scale (VOS) and expanded disability status scales (EDSS) were evaluated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

35 studies were included between 1985 and 2020, containing 1191 patients. The response rates of PE and IA in acute attack of ON were 68% and 82% respectively. LogMAR (-0.60 to - 1.42) and VOS (-1.10 to -1.82) had been significantly improved from within 1 month to more than 1 month after PE treatment. Besides, we found that logMAR improved 1.78, 0.95 and 0.38, respectively ,when the time from symptom onset to the first PE/IA was less than 21 days, 21-28 days, and more than 28 days. The pooled mean difference of EDSS was -1.14.Adverse effects rate in patients with PE or IA were 0.20 and 0.06, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The meta-analysis provided evidence that PE/IA treatment was an effective and safe intervention, and it is recommended that early initiation of PE/IA treatment is critical.

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for steroid-resistant optic neuritis: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous "freeze-dried sulfonated human normal immunoglobulin (GGS)" in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON).

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

Patients with steroid-resistant acute ON were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous GGS (GGS group) or intravenous methylprednisolone (steroid pulse [SP] group). Visual acuity (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]), mean deviation (MD) value of the Humphrey Field Analyzer, and critical flicker fusion frequency were measured as efficacy endpoints; adverse events (AEs) were assessed as the safety endpoint.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (16 patients/group) received the study drugs. The primary endpoint, change in logMAR at week 2 compared to baseline, showed no statistically significant intergroup difference. However, compared with the SP group, change in the GGS group was increasingly indicative of visual improvement, with least squares mean difference of > 0.3 logMAR. On post-hoc analyses, the percentage of patients in the GGS and SP groups with improvement by ≥ 0.3 logMAR at week 2 were 75.0% and 31.3%, respectively. Changes in MD values at week 2 compared to baseline were 9.258  ±  8.296 (mean ± standard deviation) dB and 3.175  ±  6.167 dB in the GGS and SP groups, respectively. These results showed statistically significant intergroup differences (visual acuity improvement, P = 0.032; change in MD values, P = 0.030). No clinically significant AEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin could be a safe and efficacious therapeutic option for prompt treatment of steroid-resistant acute ON.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-132080.

Timing of plasma exchange for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs) are autoimmune astrocytopathies with predominant involvement of the optic nerves and spinal cord. The current management is high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone, followed by apheresis therapy if it fails. We aimed to investigate plasma exchange (PE) benefits in corticosteroid-refractory NMOSDs.

METHODS

From Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials, we identified PE-based studies published between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019. We pooled the information of these studies in a binomial meta-analysis. We investigated the factors affecting the efficacy of PE and its adverse events. The effectiveness of PE was assessed using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The timing of PE initiation was assessed using Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

We included 561 records and identified 8 observational studies, including 228 NMOSD patients. The mean time to the initiation of PE was 11 days, and the average volume of each exchange was 1.5-2 L. PE treatment reduced the mean EDSS score by -1.04 (95% CI, -1.44 to -0.64). The initiation time of PE significantly affected the outcome (EDSS reduction) (P = 0.01; 95% CI, -1.30 to 0.28). In the ≤ 7-day and 8-23-day groups, the mean EDSS decreased by 0.64 (95% CI, -0.93 to -0.34) and 1.41 (95% CI, -1.79 to -1.02), respectively. In addition, PE showed the same efficacy for alleviating the symptoms of NMOSDs, regardless of the day between 8 to 23 days on which it was performed (P = 0.29). Thirty-five (20.8%) of the 168 patients had adverse events.

CONCLUSION

PE can ameliorate severe NMOSDs. PE effectiveness was associated with the duration between disease and the initiation of PE, and the optimal timing for PE initiation is 8 to 23 days after the onset of the disease.

Efficacy of plasma exchange in acute attacks of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Plasma exchange (PE) has usually to be considered as a rescue therapy when intravenous corticosteroids is insufficient in acute attacks of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). The efficacy of PE has not been quantified. This system review and meta-analysis was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PE therapy in acute attacks of NMOSD.

METHODS

Studies evaluating the efficacy of PE in patients with NMOSD were identified from PubMed and Embase. Changes of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score between before and after PE therapy, and the rate of response to PE, were defined as the main efficacy outcomes. Meta-regression was performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup meta-analysis were performed based on the interval of initiation PE after attack onset and AQP4-IgG serostatus of patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies containing 528 patients with NMOSD were included in this meta-analysis. As a rescue therapy when patients failed to respond to intravenous corticosteroids (PE rescue), PE treatment resulted in a reduction in the mean EDSS score by 1.69 (95% CI: 0.88-2.50), with a response rate of 75%(95%CI: 66%-83%). As a first-line therapy being used alone or simultaneously with intravenous corticosteroids (PE first-line), PE resulted in a reduction in the mean EDSS score by 2.34 (95% CI: 1.69-2.98), with a response rate of 71%(95%CI: 44%-93%). Overall, PE resulted in a reduction in the mean EDSS score by 1.83 (95% CI: 1.19-2.47), with a response rate of 74% (95%CI: 66%-82%). Subgroup analysis suggested that earlier PE initiation and AQP4-IgG seronegative patients seemed to be associated with a superior response to PE therapy.

CONCLUSION

Plasma exchange, whether used as rescue or as first-line therapy, is an effective therapeutic method in patients during acute attacks of NMOSD.

Effect of plasma exchange in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) with an acute attack.

METHODS

Systematic review was performed using EMBASE and OVID/Medline database. The eligible studies must be the studies of NMOSD patients treated with TPE during the acute phase. They must report treatment outcomes using either Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) or visual acuity (VA) before and after the therapy. Pooled mean difference (MD) was then calculated by combining MDs of each study using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were identified; eleven with 241 NMOSD patients reported EDSS outcome and four studies with 103 NMOSD reported visual outcomes. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly decreased in EDSS after TPE treatment for NMOSD with an acute attack with the pooled MD of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.26-1.40; I² 69%) comparing pretreatment to immediate posttreatment and 2.13 (95% CI, 1.55-2.70; I² 31%) comparing pretreatment to posttreatment at 6 months to 1-year follow-up. Unfortunately, only one of the four studies evaluating visual outcomes reported standard deviation in association with mean LogMAR; therefore, the meta-analysis cannot be conducted. Nonetheless, all studies consistently demonstrated the benefit of TPE with improved VA and/or LogMAR after treatment.

INTERPRETATION

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed the benefit of TPE during the NMOSD attack with a significantly improved disability status immediately after treatment and during follow-up.

SMILE: a predictive model for Scoring the severity of relapses in MultIple scLErosis

BACKGROUND

In relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), relapse severity and residual disability are difficult to predict. Nevertheless, this information is crucial both for guiding relapse treatment strategies and for informing patients.

OBJECTIVE

We, therefore, developed and validated a clinical-based model for predicting the risk of residual disability at 6 months post-relapse in MS.

METHODS

We used the data of 186 patients with RRMS collected during the COPOUSEP multicentre trial. The outcome was an increase of ≥ 1 EDSS point 6 months post-relapse treatment. We used logistic regression with LASSO penalization to construct the model, and bootstrap cross-validation to internally validate it. The model was externally validated with an independent retrospective French single-centre cohort of 175 patients.

RESULTS

The predictive factors contained in the model were age > 40 years, shorter disease duration, EDSS increase ≥ 1.5 points at time of relapse, EDSS = 0 before relapse, proprioceptive ataxia, and absence of subjective sensory disorders. Discriminative accuracy was acceptable in both the internal (AUC 0.82, 95% CI [0.73, 0.91]) and external (AUC 0.71, 95% CI [0.62, 0.80]) validations.

CONCLUSION

The predictive model we developed should prove useful for adapting therapeutic strategy of relapse and follow-up to individual patients.

NMOSD acute attack: Understanding, treatment and innovative treatment prospect

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a group of severe inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system that involves the optic nerve and spinal cord. Currently the therapeutic options for an acute attack in NMOSD are limited and rarely characterized in clinical studies. This review discussed the overall characteristics of acute attack of NMOSD, related risk factor, prognosis and management. Considering the huge unmet needs and the emergence of new therapeutic targets, we also reviewed innovative treatments that might alleviate attack damage, along with the challenges to evaluate new drug for acute attack in NMOSD.

Vision improvement in severe acute isolated optic neuritis after plasma exchange treatment in Chinese population: a prospective case series study

Background

Plasma exchange (PE) is often considered as an effective treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and several inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system. This study aimed to evaluate the visual outcomes of Chinese patients with severe acute isolated optic neuritis (ON) who received PE therapy after high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) treatment.

Methods

Thirty-seven acute isolated ON patients experiencing their first attack of severe visual impairment without neurological disability were recruited. All subjects received five cycles of double-filtration plasmapheresis. Visual acuity (VA) was documented at onset, 1 day before PE treatment, at each cycle of PE therapy and at the 1-month follow-up visit.

Results

This study included 26 female (70.3%) and 11 male (29.7%) subjects, and 18 subjects (48.6%) had bilateral involvement. The time window between onset and PE treatment was 27.3 ± 12.7 days (range: 6-53 days). Mean VA (logMAR) of the studied eyes at onset, 1-day before PE treatment/after IVMP and after the fifth PE treatment were 3.41 ± 1.50, 2.61 ± 1.64 and 1.66 ± 1.52, respectively (p < 0.001). Nineteen eyes (51.4%) showed no light perception at the onset, and 17 eyes (45.9%) improved to Snellen VA >20/800 after IVMP and PE treatments, among which five eyes (13.5%) recovered to Snellen VA 20/20 (p < 0.001). Predictors of good visual outcome included body mass index [odds ratio (OR) = 0.734, p = 0.044], serum AQP4 antibody-positive status (OR = 0.004, p = 0.001), bilaterality (OR = 0.042, p = 0.008) and time window from onset to PE therapy per 1 day (OR = 0.79, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

This study revealed that PE treatment effectively improves the visual outcomes of patients experiencing their first attack of severe acute isolated ON after high-dose IVMP treatment. Better visual outcomes can be achieved with early PE treatment.

Plasma Exchange or Immunoadsorption in Demyelinating Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease mainly affecting the central nervous system. In MS, abnormal immune mechanisms induce acute inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss, and the formation of central nervous system plaques. The long-term treatment involves options to modify the disease progression, whereas the treatment for the acute relapse has its focus in the administration of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (up to 1000 mg daily) over a period of three to five days as a first step. If symptoms of the acute relapse persist, it is defined as glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive, and immunomodulation by apheresis is recommended. However, several national and international guidelines have no uniform recommendations on using plasma exchange (PE) nor immunoadsorption (IA) in this case. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including observational studies or randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of PE or IA on different courses of MS and neuromyelitis optica (NMO). One thousand, three hundred and eighty-three patients were included in the evaluation. Therapy response in relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome was 76.6% (95%CI 63.7–89.8%) in PE- and 80.6% (95%CI 69.3–91.8%) in IA-treated patients. Based on the recent literature, PE and IA may be considered as equal treatment possibilities in patients suffering from acute, glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive MS relapses.

Acute Management of Optic Neuritis: An Evolving Paradigm

The current management of acute optic neuritis (ON) is focused on expediting visual recovery through the use of high-dose intravenous corticosteroids. The recent identification of specific autoantibodies associated with central nervous system inflammatory disorders has provided novel insights into immune targets and mechanisms that impact the prognosis, treatment, and recurrence of ON. Therefore, neurologists and ophthalmologists need to be aware of clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings that may provide important clues to the etiology of ON and the potential need for aggressive management. Moving forward, rapid and accurate diagnosis of inflammatory ON will likely be critical for implementing clinical care that optimizes short-term and long-term therapeutic outcomes.

Optic Neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the clinical presentation, evaluation, and management of the patient with optic neuritis. Initial emphasis is placed on clinical history, examination, diagnostic testing, and medical decision making, while subsequent focus is placed on examining specific inflammatory optic neuropathies. Clinical clues, examination findings, neuroimaging, and laboratory testing that differentiate autoimmune, granulomatous, demyelinating, infectious, and paraneoplastic causes of optic neuritis are assessed, and current treatments are evaluated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in technology and immunology have enhanced our understanding of the pathologies driving inflammatory optic nerve injury. Clinicians are now able to interrogate optic nerve structure and function during inflammatory injury, rapidly identify disease-relevant autoimmune targets, and deliver timely therapeutics to improve visual outcomes.

SUMMARY

Optic neuritis is a common clinical manifestation of central nervous system inflammation. Depending on the etiology, visual prognosis and the risk for recurrent injury may vary. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of optic neuritis may be critical for limiting vision loss, future neurologic disability, and organ damage. This article will aid neurologists in formulating a systematic approach to patients with optic neuritis.

Comparing Plasma Exchange to Escalated Methyl Prednisolone in Refractory Multiple Sclerosis Relapses

Intravenous methyl prednisolone (IVMPS) represents the standard of care for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, but fail to improve symptoms in one quarter of patients. In this regard, apart from extending steroid treatment to a higher dose, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been recognized as a treatment option. The aim of this retrospective, monocentric study was to investigate the efficacy of TPE versus escalated dosages of IVMPS in refractory MS relapses. An in-depth medical chart review was performed to identify patients from local databases. Relapse recovery was stratified as “good/full”, “average” and “worst/no” according to function score development. In total, 145 patients were analyzed. Good/average/worst recovery at discharge was observed in 60.9%/32.6%/6.5% of TPE versus 15.2%/14.1%/70.7% of IVMPS patients, respectively. A total of 53.5% of IVMPS patients received TPE as rescue treatment and 54.8% then responded satisfactorily. The multivariable odds ratio (OR) for worst/no recovery was 39.01 (95%–CI: 10.41–146.18; p ≤ 0.001), favoring administration of TPE as first escalation treatment. The effects were sustained at three-month follow-ups, as OR for further deterioration was 6.48 (95%–CI: 2.48–16.89; p ≤ 0.001), favoring TPE. In conclusion, TPE was superior over IVMPS in the amelioration of relapse symptoms at discharge and follow-up. This study provides class IV evidence supporting the administration of TPE as the first escalation treatment to steroid-refractory MS relapses.

Metabolic and Non-Metabolic Peripheral Neuropathy: Is there a Place for Therapeutic Apheresis?

As the rate of obesity and the incidence of diabetes mellitus have been increasing, diabetic neuropathy has become the most common cause of peripheral neuropathy in developed countries. In addition, a variety of pathogenetically heterogeneous disorders can lead to impairment of the peripheral nervous system including amyloidosis, vitamin deficiencies, uremia and lipid disorders, alcohol abuse, autoimmune and infectious diseases as well as exposure to environmental toxins. We have noted that a combination of these disorders may aggravate the manifestations of peripheral diabetic neuropathy, an effect, which is most pronounced when metabolic and non-metabolic pathologies lead to cumulative damage. Current treatment options are limited and generally have unsatisfactory results in most patients. Therapeutic apheresis (INUSpherese®) allows the removal of metabolic, inflammatory, immunologic and environmental contributors to the disease process and may be an effective treatment option. We reviewed the developments in therapeutic apheresis for metabolic and non-metabolic peripheral neuropathy, including the current literature as well as data from our university diabetes center.

Visual Outcomes of Plasma Exchange Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Optic Neuritis: A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis

Introduction

In acute inflammatory optic neuritis (ON) as a typical onset of multiple sclerosis (MS), only few studies have investigated plasma exchange (PLEX) as a sequential treatment after insufficient response to high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroids. Therefore, we aimed to investigate treatment outcome on visual acuity (VA) with PLEX in patients with steroid-refractory ON.

Methods

In our retrospective monocentric study, medical records were screened for patients with acute ON as their first relapse with sequential MS diagnosis or with an established MS diagnosis from the Bern University Hospital (Switzerland) that were treated with PLEX between 2016 and 2018 due to lacking steroid response. VA prior to steroid administration, and before and after PLEX were assessed and compared using the Friedman multiple comparison test.

Results

In total, 18 patients were included in the analysis. Interval from symptom onset to PLEX was 20.3 days (mean, 95% CI 14.8-25.9). Relevant functional improvement (VA of ≥0.5, after a mean of 15.9 (13.3-18.5) days after start of PLEX) was detected in 16/18 (88.9%) with a significant amelioration as compared to VA before glucocorticosteroids and before PLEX (p < 0.0001). VA improvement at a later time point (38.1 weeks, 25.2-51.0) was present in 15/16 (93.8%) patients. No serious adverse events were detected. PLEX could be performed via peripheral access in 13/18 patients (72.2%).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrates significant improvements of VA with PLEX in a cohort of MS patients with steroid-refractory ON. High response rates may be due to the timely treatment initiation. Despite the small sample size, our data support the early use of PLEX in steroid-refractory ON with a favorable safety profile.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

A pilot study comparing treatments for severe attacks of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) with add-on plasma exchange (PLEX) versus simultaneous ivmp and PLEX

BACKGROUND

Our previous retrospective study demonstrated that NMOSD patients with an acute attack who did not respond to IVMP alone, however, showed further significant improvement after treatment with PLEX at 6 month-follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy between treatments with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) with subsequent add-on plasma exchange (PLEX) and a combination of simultaneous IVMP and PLEX in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) patients with a severe acute attack.

METHOD

We conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled, pilot study of the treatments for a severe acute attack in NMOSD patients.

RESULTS

There were eleven AQP4-positive NMOSD patients in the study. One received only IVMP, five received IVMP with subsequent add-on PLEX treatment, and the other five received simultaneous IVMP and PLEX treatment. The attacks comprised myelitis (57.1%) and optic neuritis (42.9%). Both treatments with IVMP followed by subsequent add-on PLEX when needed (not-respond to IVMP treatment) and a combination treatment of simultaneous IVMP+PLEX from the outset showed clinical improvement measured by EDSS at 6 months follow-up, compared to those at the attacks (p-value = 0.07 in IVMP add-on PLEX group and p-value = 0.05 in IVMP+PLEX group), respectively. Although, a trend of a better outcome stratified by EDSS toward early PLEX initiation with IVMP+PLEX treatment was observed at 6 months follow-up, however not significantly.

CONCLUSION

Early treatment with PLEX should be encouraged especially in NMOSD with a severe acute attack.

Safety and efficacy of immunoadsorption versus plasma exchange in steroid-refractory relapse of multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome: A randomised, parallel-group, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Plasma exchange (PE) constitutes the standard therapy for steroid-refractory relapse in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome. Immunoadsorption (IA) is an alternative method of apheresis which selectively removes immunoglobulines (Ig) while preserving other plasma proteins. Although IA is regarded as a well-tolerated, low-risk procedure, high-level evidence for its efficacy is lacking. Therefore, we sought to investigate whether IA is superior to PE in patients with acute relapse of multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome who had insufficiently responded to high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (MP).

METHODS

Patients with acute relapse of multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome and without complete clinical remission of symptoms after at least one cycle of high-dose intravenous MP therapy were enrolled to our randomised, controlled, parallel-group, monocentric trial. Eligible patients were aged at least 12 years and had no clinical or laboratory signs of systemic infection. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either IA or PE. Patients in both groups received 5 treatments on 5 consecutive days. In the IA group, the 2.0-fold individual total plasma volume was processed on day 1, and the 2.5-fold on days 2-5. In the PE group, 2 liters of plasma (corresponding to the 0.69 ± 0.12-fold individual total plasma volume) were removed each day and substituted by 5% human albumin solution. Patients were followed up directly after last apheresis as well as 2 and 4 weeks after last treatment. The primary endpoint was change of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) after 4 weeks compared to baseline. Analyses of primary outcome and safety measures were done in all patients who received at least one treatment (intention-to-treat-population). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02671682.

FINDINGS

Between January 21, 2016, and October 26, 2018, 63 patients were screened for eligibility, and 61 patients were randomly assigned to receive IA (n = 31) or PE (n = 30). All randomised patients were included in the intention-to-treat-analysis. For the primary outcome, the median improvement of MSFC after 4 weeks compared to baseline was 0.385 (IQR 0.200-0.675; p < 0.001) in the IA group and 0.265 (IQR 0.100-0.408; p < 0.001) in the PE group. Improvement in the IA group was significantly larger (p = 0.034) compared to PE. Response rates after 4 weeks were 86.7% in the IA group and 76.7% in the PE group. One deep venous thrombosis occurred in each group.

INTERPRETATION

Both IA and PE were safe in patients with steroid-refractory relapse and resulted in significant improvements of the primary outcome MSFC after 4 weeks compared to baseline. IA patients showed significantly larger improvements of MSFC compared to PE patients after 4 weeks. The results indicate a potential superiority of IA compared to PE in treatment of steroid-refractory relapse in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, which has to be confirmed by future studies.

FUNDING

Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.

Plasma Exchange as a First Line Therapy in Acute Attacks of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders

Background and Aims:

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a demyelinating disorder of central nervous system with deleterious effects. At present Intravenous corticosteroids are used for the relapse as the first line of treatment, but with only a class evidence III-IV. Having an underlying humoral immune mechanism in the pathogenesis of NMOSD and as it is rightly said that “Time is Cord and Eyes”, delaying the time to start plasma exchange (PLEX) awaiting favorable outcome in response to corticosteroids is detrimental for the patient. Hence, PLEX may be a promising first line therapeutic approach in the management of severe attacks of NMOSD. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of PLEX as the first line of treatment for the acute attacks in patients with NMOSD that is being largely used as an add-on therapy for more than 10 years, and also to define the time opportunity window for the starting of PLEX.

Methods:

The study analysed the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of PLEX as a first line therapy in 30 patients diagnosed with NMOSD over a period of 30 months. PLEX was performed using a Hemonetics Mobile Collection System plus machine with due written consent including the risks and benefits of the treatment that is being proposed to the patient/relative in their own language.

Results:

A total of 30 patients were analysed, out of which 16 were females and rest males. 85% of the patients were in the age group of 25-35 years. All the patients had severe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores at the baseline, and 73.33% showed significant improvement following PLEX. The only predictor of good outcome was the time to PLEX i.e shorter delay betters the outcome.

Conclusion:

The study ascertained the importance of early PLEX as a therapeutic intervention in severe attacks of NMOSD irrespective of their Anti-Aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody status.

Models and treatments for traumatic optic neuropathy and demyelinating optic neuritis

Pathologies of the optic nerve could result as primary insults in the visual tract or as secondary deficits due to inflammation, demyelination, or compressing effects of the surrounding tissue. The extent of damage may vary from mild to severe, differently affecting patient vision, with the most severe forms leading to complete uni- or bilateral visual loss. The aim of researchers and clinicians in the field is to alleviate the symptoms of these, yet uncurable pathologies, taking advantage of known and novel potential therapeutic approaches, alone or in combinations, and applying them in a limited time window after the insult. In this review, we discuss the epidemiological and clinical profile as well as the pathophysiological mechanisms of two main categories of optic nerve pathologies, namely traumatic optic neuropathy and optic neuritis, focusing on the demyelinating form of the latter. Moreover, we report on the main rodent models mimicking these pathologies or some of their clinical aspects. The current treatment options will also be reviewed and novel approaches will be discussed.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in paediatric neurology: a critical review and proposed treatment algorithm

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been a key immunotherapeutic strategy in numerous neurological syndromes, predominantly during the acute phase of illness. This paper reviews the indications, strength of evidence, and safety of TPE in children with neurological conditions. The rarity of these immune conditions in children, alongside an often incomplete understanding of their pathobiology, has limited the development of a robust scientific rationale for TPE therapy and the feasibility of conducting larger controlled trials. TPE continues to be used, but is a costly therapy with common adverse effects. Uncertainty remains over how to compare the different TPE methods, the optimal dosage of therapy, and monitoring and integration of TPE with other immunotherapies. Further studies are also required to define the indications and benefits of TPE and assess evolving technologies such as immunoadsorption.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Studies investigating therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) are small and mainly uncontrolled. They provide evidence for the efficacy of TPE in childhood neuro-inflammatory conditions. TPE is generally well tolerated provided key adverse effects are anticipated and avoided. Systematic dosing and objective assessment of treatment effect should be priorities for future research.

Updates and Controversies in the Management of Acute Optic Neuritis

Optic neuritis remains a common diagnosis with controversial management. Although typical optic neuritis is often associated with "good" recovery of visual acuity, patients are often left with persistent impairments of contrast sensitivity, color vision, and visual field. These permanent visual deficits correlate with structural injury to the anterior visual pathway and are closely linked to visual quality of life. High dose corticosteroids are commonly used for patients with acute optic neuritis. However, even several decades after the initial clinical trials, there remains significant controversy regarding the efficacy and utility of this treatment. There is a need for more effective treatments, and many new immunomodulatory and neuroprotective agents have been investigated recently. Atypical optic neuritis, such as that seen with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, often requires more aggressive initial treatment. Thus, it is important for clinicians to have a framework for rapid diagnosis and triage of patients who present with typical or atypical optic neuritis. Lastly, optic neuritis is associated with an elevated long-term risk of developing multiple sclerosis. Some patients may benefit from initiation of medications targeting multiple sclerosis at the time of initial presentation of optic neuritis. Appropriate identification and treatment of patients at highest risk of developing multiple sclerosis may help impact their disease course, while limiting exposure to potential adverse effects in patients who are at lower risk and do not require disease-modifying treatment.

Short-term effect of additional apheresis on visual acuity changes in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

PURPOSE

To evaluate temporal changes in visual acuity in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) after apheresis.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study, clinical case series SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical charts of 15 eyes of 9 consecutive patients with ON in NMOSD who underwent apheresis between March 2010 and September 2017. All patients were seropositive for anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody and resistant to steroid pulse therapy. Apheresis was performed by either simple plasma exchange or/and immune adsorption therapy.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes (80%) showed improvement with logMAR > 0.3 at 1 month after apheresis. Within 1 month after apheresis therapy, logMAR on average significantly decreased, the magnitude of change being greatest within the first week. Thereafter visual acuity became stable in 10 of the 11 eyes, until 12 months. However, two eyes (12%) showed recurrence of visual acuity reduction 3 months after the cessation of apheresis. There were a few serious complications during and after apheresis, but these were completely treatable.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional apheresis therapy rapidly improves the visual acuity of steroid-resistant seropositive AQP4 ON.

Optic neuritis: the eye as a window to the brain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute optic neuritis is a common clinical problem, requiring a structured assessment to guide management and prevent visual loss. The optic nerve is the most accessible part of the central nervous system, so optic neuritis also represents an important paradigm to help decipher mechanisms of damage and recovery in the central nervous system. Important developments include the advent of optical coherence tomography as a biomarker of central nervous system axonal loss, the discovery of new pathological antibodies, notably against aquaporin-4 and, more recently, myelin oligodendrocyte protein, and emerging evidence for sodium channel blockade as a novel therapeutic approach to address energy failure in neuroinflammatory disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

We will present a practical approach to assessment of optic neuritis, highlighting the role of optical coherence tomography, when to test for new antibodies and the results of recent trials of sodium channel blockers.

SUMMARY

Optic neuritis remains a clinical diagnosis; increasingly optical coherence tomography is a key ancillary investigation. Patients with 'typical' optic neuritis, commonly a first presentation of multiple sclerosis, must be distinguished from 'atypical' optic neuritis, who require testing for new pathological antibodies and require more aggressive-targeted treatment. Sodium channel blockade is an emerging and novel potential therapeutic pathway in neuroinflammatory disease.

Deciphering the Role of B Cells in Multiple Sclerosis-Towards Specific Targeting of Pathogenic Function

B cells, plasma cells and antibodies may play a key role in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS). This notion is supported by various immunological changes observed in MS patients, such as activation and pro-inflammatory differentiation of peripheral blood B cells, the persistence of clonally expanded plasma cells producing immunoglobulins in the cerebrospinal fluid, as well as the composition of inflammatory central nervous system lesions frequently containing co-localizing antibody depositions and activated complement. In recent years, the perception of a respective pathophysiological B cell involvement was vividly promoted by the empirical success of anti-CD20-mediated B cell depletion in clinical trials; based on these findings, the first monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody—ocrelizumab—is currently in the process of being approved for treatment of MS. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the role of B cells, plasma cells and antibodies in MS and elucidate how approved and future treatments, first and foremost anti-CD20 antibodies, therapeutically modify these B cell components. We will furthermore describe regulatory functions of B cells in MS and discuss how the evolving knowledge of these therapeutically desirable B cell properties can be harnessed to improve future safety and efficacy of B cell-directed therapy in MS.

B Cell-Directed Therapeutics in Multiple Sclerosis: Rationale and Clinical Evidence

Over the last decade, evidence condensed that B cells, B cell-derived plasma cells and antibodies play a key role in the pathogenesis and progression of multiple sclerosis (MS). In many patients with MS, peripheral B cells show signs of chronic activation; within the cerebrospinal fluid clonally expanded plasma cells produce oligoclonal immunoglobulins, which remain a hallmark diagnostic finding. Confirming the clinical relevance of these immunological alterations, recent trials testing anti-CD20-mediated depletion of peripheral B cells showed an instantaneous halt in development of new central nervous system lesions and occurrence of relapses. Notwithstanding this enormous success, not all B cells or B cell subsets may contribute in a pathogenic manner, and may, in contrast, exert anti-inflammatory and, thus, therapeutically desirable properties in MS. Naïve B cells, in MS patients similar to healthy controls, are a relevant source of regulatory cytokines such as interleukin-10, which dampens the activity of other immune cells and promotes recovery from acute disease flares in experimental MS models. In this review, we describe in detail pathogenic but also regulatory properties of B and plasma cells in the context of MS and its animal model experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. In the second part, we review what impact current and future therapies may have on these B cell properties. Within this section, we focus on the highly encouraging data on anti-CD20 antibodies as future therapy for MS. Lastly, we discuss how B cell-directed therapy in MS could be possibly advanced even further in regard to efficacy and safety by integrating the emerging information on B cell regulation in MS into future therapeutic strategies.