High efficacy of rituximab for myasthenia gravis: a comprehensive nationwide study in Austria

Advances in B Cell Targeting for Treating Muscle-Specific Tyrosine Kinase-Associated Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a typical autoimmune disease of the nervous system. It is characterized by skeletal muscle weakness and fatigue due to impaired neuromuscular junction transmission mediated by IgG autoantibodies. Muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase-associated MG (MuSK-MG), a rare and severe subtype of MG, is distinguished by the presence of anti-MuSK antibodies; it responds poorly to traditional therapies. Recent research on MuSK-MG treatment has focused on specific targeted therapies. Since B cells play a critical pathogenic role in producing autoantibodies and inflammatory mediators, they are often considered the preferred target for treating MuSK-MG. Currently, various B cell-targeted drugs have been developed to treat MuSK-MG; they have shown good therapeutic effects. This review explores the evolving landscape of B cell-targeted therapies in MuSK-MG, focusing on their mechanisms, efficacy, and safety, and the current limitations associated with their use. We discuss current B cell-targeted therapies aimed at depleting or modulating B cells via both direct and indirect approaches. Furthermore, we focus on novel and promising strategies such as Chimeric Autoantibody Receptor T cell therapy, which explicitly targets MuSK-specific B cells without compromising general humoral immunity. Finally, this review provides an outlook on the potential benefits and limitations of B cell-targeted therapy in developing new therapies for MuSK-MG. We conclude by discussing future research efforts needed to optimize these therapies, expand treatment options, and improve long-term outcomes in MuSK-MG management.

A clinical perspective on muscle specific kinase antibody positive myasthenia gravis

The discovery of autoantibodies directed against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) in "seronegative" myasthenia gravis (MG) patients marked a milestone in MG research. In healthy muscle, MuSK regulates a phosphorylation pathway, which is essential for the development and maintenance of acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters at the neuromuscular junction. Autoantibodies directed against MuSK are predominantly of the IgG4 subclass, but there is increasing evidence that IgG1-3 could also contribute to the pathology underlying MuSK-MG. MuSK-IgG4 are monovalent and block the binding site for LRP4 on MuSK, thereby inhibiting the downstream phosphorylation pathway and compromising the formation of AChR clusters. Clinically, MuSK-MG is commonly associated with the predominant involvement of bulbar, facial, shoulder and neck muscles. Cholinesterase inhibitors should be avoided in MuSK-MG due to the risk of clinical impairment and cholinergic crisis. Corticosteroids and other non-steroidal immunosuppressants are less effective with the need for higher doses and prolonged treatment. Rituximab, by contrast, has been shown to be particularly effective and is now often used early in the disease course. Its use is associated with a significant improvement in the clinical outcome of MuSK-MG patients over time. This review aims to describe the pathophysiology underlying MuSK-MG and provide a comprehensive overview of the clinical features and therapeutic options.

Clinical and laboratory remission with rituximab in anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

Increasing data are available on the use and efficacy of rituximab (RTX) in patients with anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-positive myasthenia gravis (MG), especially those steroid-dependent or unresponsive to traditional immunotherapies.

AIMS

We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of adult patients with generalized anti-MuSK-positive MG treated with RTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively recruited 16 patients who were on RTX, between January 2010 and September 2023. RTX was given 1000 mg/day intravenously twice, two weeks apart. Maintenance treatment was administered at intervals of 3-6 months based on clinical evaluation. The outcome was assessed by Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI) scores. Additionally, anti-MuSK antibody levels were retested after treatment in all patients except one.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were female. The mean age at disease onset was 35.3 ± 17.3 years. The median duration between disease onset and RTX administration was 2.4 years (min-max: 0.5-36.5 years). The worst MGFA class before RTX was between IIIb-V. After RTX treatment, 81.3% of patients achieved MGFA minimal manifestations or better and MGSTI level 1 or better. Anti-MuSK antibodies became negative in 12 patients, while they remained positive in three. The changes in antibody levels seemed associated with clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

RTX is an effective treatment in anti-MuSK-positive MG. Furthermore, our results support the inhibition of antibody production by RTX and we recommend monitoring anti-MuSK antibody titers to follow disease progression and treatment response.

Efgartigimod treatment in patients with anti-MuSK-positive myasthenia gravis in exacerbation

Background

The prevalence of patients positive for muscle-specific kinase antibody (hereafter, MuSK-Ab) accounts for 5-8% of all myasthenia gravis (MG) cases. Currently, efgartigimod has shown good therapeutic effects in MUSK-Ab-positive MG patients in a phase III clinical trial. However, phase III clinical trials tend to exclude MG patients in exacerbation, and there are only few real-world studies on the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive myasthenic crisis (MC) patients. This retrospective, real-world study aimed to explore the efficacy of efgartigimod in MuSK-Ab-positive MG with exacerbation.

Methods

We reviewed the clinical data of four MuSK-Ab-positive patients with exacerbation of MG who received efgartigimod at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, including two patients with MC. All patients were admitted between September 2023 and May 2024. Most patients are simultaneously undergoing rituximab treatment.

Results

Each patient completed one cycle of efgartigimod. After the first administration, four patients showed a clinically meaningful decrease in the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) score (a reduction of more than 4 points compared to baseline), and all patients showed a decrease in IgG levels after one cycle of efgartigimod. Regarding safety, none of the patients experienced any obvious adverse effects. At the final follow-up, all patients achieved the minimal symptom expression status (an MG-ADL score of 0 or 1) following the first administration of efgartigimod for 8.75 ± 5.56 weeks. This article presents a case involving a patient who exhibited prompt alleviation of symptoms following the administration of a high dose of efgartigimod (20 mg/kg, given on days 1 and 5), without the use of any other fast-acting treatment.

Conclusion

This retrospective real-world study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of efgartigimod in these four MuSK-Ab-positive, female Asian patients with exacerbation of MG, as well as in patients experiencing MC. It is important to note that efgartigimod should not be viewed as a substitute for foundational immunotherapy; rather, it is intended as a rescue treatment during exacerbations and as an adjunctive therapy in the context of long-term immunotherapy. This non-invasive approach has the potential to become another treatment option for MuSK-Ab-positive MG patients.

Effect of thymectomy on the frequencies of peripheral regulatory B and T lymphocytes in patients with Myasthenia gravis-a pilot study

AIM

We aimed to investigate the relationship between the peripheral lymphocyte subset frequency and thymectomy in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The frequencies of regulatory B (Breg) and regulatory T (Treg) cells in peripheral blood samples obtained from 69 patients with MG and 10 healthy controls were analyzed using flow cytometry. Serum acetylcholine receptor antibodies (AchR-Ab) were measured. Patients with MG were subdivided into pre-thymectomy, post-thymectomy, and normal thymus control group.

RESULTS

The percentage of Breg cells was significantly decreased in both the pre-thymectomy (7.92 ± 1.30%) and post-thymectomy (8.14 ± 1.34%) groups compared to healthy controls (16.02 ± 2.78%) and reduced in the exacerbation and relapse phase compared to the stable maintenance stage. The proportion of cluster of differentiation (CD) 4 + CD25 + T cells and CD4 + CD25 + CD127low/- Treg cells in MG patients were not significantly different than healthy controls. AchR-Ab titers in aggravating or recurrence patients after thymectomy were significantly higher than that of the stable remission patients (11.13 ± 0.70 and 6.03 ± 0.85 nmol/L, respectively; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of Breg cells may serve as a potential indicator of MG prognosis, while Treg cell frequency did not demonstrate the same prognostic ability. The concentration of AchR-Ab can be used as a dynamic monitoring index of disease severity in patients with MG.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose rituximab in the treatment of myasthenia gravis: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody that has been increasingly used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis (MG). In most studies, the therapeutic protocol of RTX has been similar to that adopted for B cell lymphoma, with an increasing number of studies aimed at exploring the efficacy of low-dose RTX in MG. However, the beneficial effects of low-dose RTX in MG remain a subject of critical debate.

Methods

This study was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Two reviewers (Xishuai Yang and Bingxia Li) independently conducted searches across multiple databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). A meta-analysis, utilizing representative forest plots, was performed to assess "Improved clinical status" and changes in the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) score before and after treatment.

Results

A total of 17 studies involving 292 patients were included in the meta-analysis. A noticeable improvement in clinical status was observed in 91% of patients at the final follow-up after therapy (95% CI: 84-96%, P < 0.001). The QMG score showed a significant reduction following the treatment, with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -1.69 (95% CI: -2.21 to -1.16, Z = 6.29, P < 0.001). In the acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (AChR-MG) group, 90% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 80-97%, P < 0.001) and the QMG score significantly decreased after low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -1.51 (95% CI: -0.80 to -2.21, Z = 4.50, P < 0.001). In the muscle-specific kinase antibody-positive myasthenia gravis (MuSK-MG) group, 97% of patients achieved improved clinical status (95% CI: 89-100%, P < 0.001). The QMG score also significantly decreased following low-dose RTX treatment, with an SMD of -2.31 (95% CI: -2.99 to -1.62, Z = 6.60, P < 0.001). Adverse effects were reported in 29 out of 207 patients (14%, including infusion reactions in 22 patients (10.1%), infections in three patients (1.45%), cytopenia in two patients (0.96%), eosinophilia in one patient (0.48%), and hemiplegia in one patient (0.48%). Additionally, one patient (0.48%) succumbed to complications from invasive thymoma.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis shows that low-dose RTX is both effective and safe for treating MG.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42024509951.

Rituximab alone is as effective as associated with steroids on naive patients with generalized myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Rituximab (RTX) has been proven effective in managing refractory generalized myasthenia gravis (MG), and its use is increasing worldwide. MG stabilization may initially require oral corticosteroid (CS) therapy, but its long-term side effects require the shortest duration of treatment. We studied the clinical effectiveness and usefulness of corticosteroids associated with RTX compared to RTX alone on MG remission.

METHODS

In a monocentric retrospective cohort in the Nice University Hospital, we compared naïve MG patients treated with RTX as first-line therapy alone (G1) or associated with CS (G2). After the RTX induction, we evaluated efficacy with the Osserman score (OS) and the requirement for any rescue therapy (IVIg or plasmapheresis).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were treated with RTX, of which 19 (27.94%) benefited from an association with at least 0.5 mg/kg of corticosteroids. RTX-CS patients were more severe than RTX alone (OS for G1: 74.1 and G2: 64.94, p = 0.044). However, OS at 3 (83.44 and 83.12, p = 0.993), 6 (88.69 and 86.36, p = 0.545), 9 (82.91 and 85.73, p = 0.563), and 12 months (86.6 and 88.69, p = 0.761) from the treatment induction were similar. Rescue therapy following RTX induction was significantly higher for the RTX-CS (20.41% and 47.37%, p = 0.037). Regarding safety, adverse event rates were similar in the two groups (0% and 14.29%, p = 0.178).

CONCLUSION

We suggest that RTX alone is as effective as RTX-CS in MG patients, indicating that avoiding steroids could reduce side effects, decrease rescue therapies, and not affect MG outcomes.

The relationship between neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and autoimmune diseases

Objective

There have been reports of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) coexisting with connective tissue disorders. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of NMOSD coexisting with autoimmune diseases (AID).

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated NMOSD patients with and without AID. The enrolled patients had at least one attack, with duration of more than 1 year. Data on the demographics, clinical features, and laboratory findings were assessed. The Poisson model was used to investigate the risk factors associated with the annualized relapse rate (ARR), whereas the Cox model was used to evaluate the risk factors for the first relapse.

Results

A total of 180 patients (154 women and 26 men) with NMOSD were identified: 45 had AID and 135 did not. Female patients had a higher prevalence of concomitant AID (p = 0.006) and a greater relapse rate within the first year. There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that NMOSD patients with seropositive aquaporin 4 antibodies (AQP4-Ab; log-rank: p = 0.044), had a shorter time to relapse. Patients seropositive for AQP4-Ab (HR = 2.402, 95%CI = 1.092-5.283, p = 0.029) had a higher risk of suffering a first relapse, according to the Cox model. Patients with and without AID showed a similar declining tendency in terms of change in ARR throughout the first 5 years of the disease. The ARR was greater in the first year [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 1.534, 95%CI = 1.111-2.118] and the first 2 years (IRR = 1.474, 95%CI = 1.056-2.058) in patients with coexisting AID diagnosis prior to the NMOSD onset.

Conclusions

Patients with NMOSD with coexisting AID had similar characteristics when compared with those without AID. NMOSD patients with AID diagnosed before onset had a higher risk of relapse in the early stage of the disease.

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with refractory generalized myasthenia gravis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab with conventional immunotherapy in refractory patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG).

METHODS

This single-center prospective cohort study was based on patients from an MG registry study in China and conducted from February 10, 2021 to March 31, 2022. Adult refractory patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG were assigned to tocilizumab or conventional immunotherapy groups. The primary efficacy outcome was the mean difference of MG activities of daily living (MG-ADL) change at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 corresponding to that at the baseline between the two groups. A generalized estimating equation model was used for the primary outcome analysis. Safety was assessed based on adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 34 eligible patients, 20 (mean [standard deviation] age, 53.8 [21.9] years; 12 [60.0%] female) received tocilizumab and 14 received conventional immunotherapy (45.8 [18.0] years; 8 [57.1%] female). The tocilizumab group had greater reduction in MG-ADL score at week 4 (adjusted mean difference, -3.4; 95% CI, -4.7 to -2.0; p < 0.001) than the conventional immunotherapy group, with significant differences sustained through week 24 (adjusted mean difference, -4.5; 95% CI, -6.4 to -2.6; p < 0.001). At week 24, the proportion of patients achieving higher levels of MG-ADL (up to 7-point reduction) and QMG (up to 11-point reduction) scores improvement was significantly greater with tocilizumab. Tocilizumab had acceptable safety profiles without severe or unexpected safety issues.

CONCLUSION

Tocilizumab is safe and effective in improving the MG-ADL score and reducing prednisone dose in refractory AChR-Ab+ gMG, suggesting tocilizumab has the potential to be a valuable therapeutic option for such patients.

Generalized myasthenia gravis with acetylcholine receptor antibodies: A guidance for treatment

BACKGROUND

Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) with antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor is a chronic disease causing muscle weakness. Access to novel treatments warrants authoritative treatment recommendations. The Nordic countries have similar, comprehensive health systems, mandatory health registers, and extensive MG research.

METHODS

MG experts and patient representatives from the five Nordic countries formed a working group to prepare treatment guidance for MG based on a systematic literature search and consensus meetings.

RESULTS

Pyridostigmine represents the first-line symptomatic treatment, while ambenonium and beta adrenergic agonists are second-line options. Early thymectomy should be undertaken if a thymoma, and in non-thymoma patients up to the age of 50-65 years if not obtaining remission on symptomatic treatment. Most patients need immunosuppressive drug treatment. Combining corticosteroids at the lowest possible dose with azathioprine is recommended, rituximab being an alternative first-line option. Mycophenolate, methotrexate, and tacrolimus represent second-line immunosuppression. Plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin are used for myasthenic crises and acute exacerbations. Novel complement inhibitors and FcRn blockers are effective and fast-acting treatments with promising safety profiles. Their use depends on local availability, refunding policies, and cost-benefit analyses. Adapted physical training is recommended. Planning of pregnancies with optimal treatment, information, and awareness of neonatal MG is necessary. Social support and adaptation of work and daily life activities are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment of MG rests on timely combination of different interventions. Due to spontaneous disease fluctuations, comorbidities, and changes in life conditions, regular long-term specialized follow-up is needed. Most patients do reasonably well but there is room for further improvement. Novel treatments are promising, though subject to restricted access due to costs.

Myasthenia gravis: the changing treatment landscape in the era of molecular therapies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder that affects the neuromuscular junction, leading to muscle weakness and fatigue. MG is caused by antibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), the muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) or other AChR-related proteins that are expressed in the postsynaptic muscle membrane. The standard therapeutic approach for MG has relied on acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which have shown good efficacy in improving MG-related symptoms in most people with the disease; however, these therapies can carry a considerable burden of long-term adverse effects. Moreover, up to 15% of individuals with MG exhibit limited or no response to these standard therapies. The emergence of molecular therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, B cell-depleting agents and chimeric antigen receptor T cell-based therapies, has the potential to revolutionize the MG treatment landscape. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of the progress achieved in molecular therapies for MG associated with AChR antibodies and MuSK antibodies, elucidating both the challenges and the opportunities these therapies present to the field. The latest developments in MG treatment are described, exploring the potential for personalized medicine approaches.

Guideline for the management of myasthenic syndromes

Myasthenia gravis (MG), Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), and congenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) represent an etiologically heterogeneous group of (very) rare chronic diseases. MG and LEMS have an autoimmune-mediated etiology, while CMS are genetic disorders. A (strain dependent) muscle weakness due to neuromuscular transmission disorder is a common feature. Generalized MG requires increasingly differentiated therapeutic strategies that consider the enormous therapeutic developments of recent years. To include the newest therapy recommendations, a comprehensive update of the available German-language guideline 'Diagnostics and therapy of myasthenic syndromes' has been published by the German Neurological society with the aid of an interdisciplinary expert panel. This paper is an adapted translation of the updated and partly newly developed treatment guideline. It defines the rapid achievement of complete disease control in myasthenic patients as a central treatment goal. The use of standard therapies, as well as modern immunotherapeutics, is subject to a staged regimen that takes into account autoantibody status and disease activity. With the advent of modern, fast-acting immunomodulators, disease activity assessment has become pivotal and requires evaluation of the clinical course, including severity and required therapies. Applying MG-specific scores and classifications such as Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living, Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis, and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America allows differentiation between mild/moderate and (highly) active (including refractory) disease. Therapy decisions must consider age, thymic pathology, antibody status, and disease activity. Glucocorticosteroids and the classical immunosuppressants (primarily azathioprine) are the basic immunotherapeutics to treat mild/moderate to (highly) active generalized MG/young MG and ocular MG. Thymectomy is indicated as a treatment for thymoma-associated MG and generalized MG with acetylcholine receptor antibody (AChR-Ab)-positive status. In (highly) active generalized MG, complement inhibitors (currently eculizumab and ravulizumab) or neonatal Fc receptor modulators (currently efgartigimod) are recommended for AChR-Ab-positive status and rituximab for muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK)-Ab-positive status. Specific treatment for myasthenic crises requires plasmapheresis, immunoadsorption, or IVIG. Specific aspects of ocular, juvenile, and congenital myasthenia are highlighted. The guideline will be further developed based on new study results for other immunomodulators and biomarkers that aid the accurate measurement of disease activity.

Rituximab treatment in myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease mediated by antibodies against post-synaptic proteins of the neuromuscular junction. Up to 10%-30% of patients are refractory to conventional treatments. For these patients, rituximab has been used off-label in the recent decades. Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 protein that leads to B cell depletion and to the synthesis of new antibody-secreting plasma cells. Although rituximab was created to treat B-cell lymphoma, its use has widely increased to treat autoimmune diseases. In MG, the benefit of rituximab treatment in MuSK-positive patients seems clear, but a high variability in the results of observational studies and even clinical trials has been reported for AChR-positive patients. Moreover, few evidence has been reported in seronegative MG and juvenile MG and some questions about regimen of administration or monitoring strategies, remains open. In this review, we intend to revise the available literature on this topic and resume the current evidence of effectiveness of Rituximab in MG, with special attention to results on every MG subtype, as well as the administration protocols, monitoring strategies and safety profile of the drug.

Immunotherapies in MuSK-positive Myasthenia Gravis; an IgG4 antibody-mediated disease

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) Myasthenia Gravis (MG) represents a prototypical antibody-mediated disease characterized by predominantly focal muscle weakness (neck, facial, and bulbar muscles) and fatigability. The pathogenic antibodies mostly belong to the immunoglobulin subclass (Ig)G4, a feature which attributes them their specific properties and pathogenic profile. On the other hand, acetylcholine receptor (AChR) MG, the most prevalent form of MG, is characterized by immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 and IgG3 antibodies to the AChR. IgG4 class autoantibodies are impotent to fix complement and only weakly bind Fc-receptors expressed on immune cells and exert their pathogenicity via interfering with the interaction between their targets and binding partners (e.g. between MuSK and LRP4). Cardinal differences between AChR and MuSK-MG are the thymus involvement (not prominent in MuSK-MG), the distinct HLA alleles, and core immunopathological patterns of pathology in neuromuscular junction, structure, and function. In MuSK-MG, classical treatment options are usually less effective (e.g. IVIG) with the need for prolonged and high doses of steroids difficult to be tapered to control symptoms. Exceptional clinical response to plasmapheresis and rituximab has been particularly observed in these patients. Reduction of antibody titers follows the clinical efficacy of anti-CD20 therapies, a feature implying the role of short-lived plasma cells (SLPB) in autoantibody production. Novel therapeutic monoclonal against B cells at different stages of their maturation (like plasmablasts), or against molecules involved in B cell activation, represent promising therapeutic targets. A revolution in autoantibody-mediated diseases is pharmacological interference with the neonatal Fc receptor, leading to a rapid reduction of circulating IgGs (including autoantibodies), an approach already suitable for AChR-MG and promising for MuSK-MG. New precision medicine approaches involve Chimeric autoantibody receptor T (CAAR-T) cells that are engineered to target antigen-specific B cells in MuSK-MG and represent a milestone in the development of targeted immunotherapies. This review aims to provide a detailed update on the pathomechanisms involved in MuSK-MG (cellular and humoral aberrations), fostering the understanding of the latest indications regarding the efficacy of different treatment strategies.

On the path to evidence-based therapy in neuromuscular disorders

Neuromuscular disorders encompass a diverse group of acquired and genetic diseases characterized by loss of motor functionality. Although cure is the goal, many therapeutic strategies have been envisioned and are being studied in randomized clinical trials and entered clinical practice. As in all scientific endeavors, the successful clinical translation depends on the quality and translatability of preclinical findings and on the predictive value and feasibility of the clinical models. This chapter focuses on five exemplary diseases: childhood spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disorders, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), acquired autoimmune myasthenia gravis (MG), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), to illustrate the progress made on the path to evidenced-based therapy.

A single low-dose rituximab infusion in severe chronic refractory myasthenia gravis in resource-limited settings

The benefits of multi-dose rituximab cycles in patients with refractory anti-muscle-specific kinase antibody myasthenia gravis (MuSK+MG) are well reported, although less consistently in anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody MG (AChR+MG). Responsivity data to single low-dose rituximab infusions for refractory autoimmune myasthenia, are limited. Here, observational outcomes using MG grading scores and prednisone doses, before and after at least six months of a single-dose infusion of rituximab, were audited in previously treatment-refractory MG patients in a resource-limited setting. Seventeen moderately-severe to severely symptomatic MG patients received single low-dose rituximab infusions (median 500-600 mg) after a median MG duration of 6 years; 13 individuals responded including 5/5 MuSK+MG, 7/10 AChR+MG and 1/2 double seronegative MG. Three (60%) MuSK+MG and three (30%) AChR+MG achieved persistent asymptomatic status. Although more MuSK+MG vs AChR+MG cases stopped prednisone (80% vs 20%, respectively), the prednisone doses in the AChR+MG group was significantly reduced ≥30% (p = 0.008) due to improved MG composite scores (p = 0.016) and with durable benefit (median 12 months). There were no differences between responders and non-responders in MG duration and age at infusion. These results suggest that a single low-dose rituximab infusion is worth trying in refractory MG, including AChR+MG patients, as some patients showed good and durable responses. These results are particularly relevant to resource-limited settings.

New Targeted Agents in Myasthenia Gravis and Future Therapeutic Strategies

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease for which multiple immunomodulatory therapies are available. Nevertheless, MG has a significant impact on patient quality of life. In recent years, experts' main efforts have focused on optimizing treatment strategies, since disease burden is considerably affected by their safety and tolerability profiles, especially in patients with refractory phenotypes. This article aims to offer neurologists caring for MG patients an overview of the most innovative targeted drugs specifically designed for this disease and summarizes the recent literature and more recent evidence on agents targeting B cells and plasmablasts, complement inhibitors, and neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) antagonists. Positive clinical trial results have been reported, and other studies are ongoing. Finally, we briefly discuss how the introduction of these novel targeted immunological therapies in a changing management paradigm would affect not only clinical outcomes, disease burden, safety, and tolerability, but also health spending in a condition that is increasingly managed based on a patient-centred model.

Complement and myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis is a neuromuscular disease associated with antibodies against components of the neuromuscular junction, most often against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR). Although several mechanisms have been postulated to explain how these autoantibodies can lead to the pathology of the disease, convincing evidence suggests that destruction of the receptor-bearing postsynaptic membrane by complement membrane attack complex is of central importance. In this review, evidence for the importance of complement, and possible relationships between autoantigen, autoantibodies, complement activation, and the destruction of the membrane are discussed. More recent insights from the results of the complement-inhibiting therapeutic antibody eculizumab are also described, and the mechanisms connecting antibody binding to complement activation are considered from a structural viewpoint.

Long-Term Remission With Low-Dose Rituximab in Myasthenia Gravis: A Retrospective Study

OBJETIVE

Rituximab (RTX) is a therapeutic option, for patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) not responding to conventional immunosuppressive treatment. In this cohort, we evaluated long-term efficacy of RTX in the treatment of refractory generalized MG.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed in adult patients with refractory generalized MG and at least 24 months of follow-up, between January/2015 and October/2021. The Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity Score was used to assess outcomes, and CD19/CD20+ B-cell counts were monitored.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients with MG (8 antiacetylcholine receptor+ and 8 muscle-specific antikinase+; mean age 45.5 ± 16.2 years) treated with low-dose RTX protocols were included. CD19/CD20 levels remained undetectable 12 months after induction, and no new relapses were observed during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose RTX infusions were sufficient to achieve undetectable CD19/20 cell counts and sustained clinical remission. In low and middle-income countries, the impact of low-dose RTX therapy represents a paradigm shift in decision-making for long-term treatment.

Rituximab in Myasthenia Gravis- Experience from a Low- and Middle-Income Country (LMIC) Setting

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an immune-mediated disorder of the neuromuscular junction. About 10% are refractory to immunosuppressive therapy.

AIMS

To analyze the response of patients with generalized MG to rituximab.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of patients with MG who received rituximab was carried out (n = 13, M:F = 6:7, mean age: 44.84 ± 15.73 years). Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA), MGFA post-intervention status (MGFA-PIS), and Myasthenia Gravis Status and Treatment Intensity (MGSTI) were assessed before and after rituximab.

RESULTS

The duration of MG was 104.07 ± 92.25 months. Before rituximab, the MGFA was IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB/IVB/V in 1/1/2/6/2/1 patients and MGSTI was four in eight patients and six in three patients. The mean duration of follow up was 20.92 ± 14.06 months (range, 4 to 42 months). Dose reduction or discontinuation of cholinesterase inhibitors could be achieved 12 patients. Complete stable remission (CSR) and pharmacologic remission (PR) were achieved in one and four patients respectively and five patients had minimal manifestations. Most patients attained level 0, 1 or 2 MGSTI at last follow up. No rituximab infusion-related adverse events were noted. Three patients had exacerbation of MG between one to five weeks after rituximab administration. Three patients died, one each due to a cardiac event unrelated to MG or treatment, complications related to myasthenic crisis, and coronavirus disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab was effective in bringing about remission in MG and can be considered as a first-line agent. However, it has to be administered under close supervision as some patients develop exacerbation of MG akin to steroid-induced worsening.

Role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and other targeted immunotherapies in myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Several patients with myasthenia gravis (MG) do not adequately respond to available drugs or exhibit poor tolerance, necessitating the need for new therapies.

AREAS COVERED

The paper discusses the rapidly evolving target-specific immunotherapies that promise long-standing remissions in the management of MG. It is specifically focused on the role of complement, anti-complement therapeutics, and the anti-FcRn and B cell monoclonals.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-AChR antibodies cause internalization of the receptors and activate complement leading to in situ MAC formation that damages the post-synaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. Inhibiting MAC formation by antibodies targeting key complements subcomponents is a reasonable therapeutic goal. Indeed, the anti-C5 monoclonal antibodies, Eculizumab, Ravulizumab, and Zilucoplan, have been successfully tested in MG with Eculizumab first and now Ravulizumab FDA-approved for refractory MG based on sustained long-term benefits. Among the biologics that inhibit FcRn, Efgartigimod caused rapid reduction of the circulating IgG in the lysosomes, and induced sustained clinical remission with good safety profile leading to FDA-approved indication. Anti-B cell agents, like Rituximab, can induce sustained long-term remissions, especially in IgG4 antibody-mediated Musk-MG, by targeting short-lived antibody-secreting plasmablasts. These biologics offer effective targeted immunotherapies with good tolerance promising to change the therapeutic algorithm in the chronic MG management.

Eculizumab versus rituximab in generalised myasthenia gravis

OBJECTIVE

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most common autoimmune disorder affecting the neuromuscular junction. However, evidence shaping treatment decisions, particularly for treatment-refractory cases, is sparse. Both rituximab and eculizumab may be considered as therapeutic options for refractory MG after insufficient symptom control by standard immunosuppressive therapies.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we included 57 rituximab-treated and 20 eculizumab-treated patients with MG to compare the efficacy of treatment agents in generalised, therapy-refractory anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody (anti-AChR-ab)-mediated MG with an observation period of 24 months. Change in the quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) score was defined as the primary outcome parameter. Differences between groups were determined in an optimal full propensity score matching model.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in terms of clinical and demographic characteristics. Eculizumab was associated with a better outcome compared with rituximab, as measured by the change of the QMG score at 12 and 24 months of treatment. Minimal manifestation of disease was more frequently achieved in eculizumab-treated patients than rituximab-treated patients at 12 and 24 months after baseline. However, the risk of myasthenic crisis (MC) was not ameliorated in either group.

INTERPRETATION

This retrospective, observational study provides the first real-world evidence supporting the use of eculizumab for the treatment of refractory, anti-AChR-ab positive MG. Nonetheless, the risk of MC remained high and prompts the need for intensified monitoring and further research effort aimed at this vulnerable patient cohort.

IgG4 Autoantibodies in Organ-Specific Autoimmunopathies: Reviewing Class Switching, Antibody-Producing Cells, and Specific Immunotherapies

Organ-specific autoimmunity is often characterized by autoantibodies targeting proteins expressed in the affected tissue. A subgroup of autoimmunopathies has recently emerged that is characterized by predominant autoantibodies of the IgG4 subclass (IgG4-autoimmune diseases; IgG4-AID). This group includes pemphigus vulgaris, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, subtypes of autoimmune encephalitis, inflammatory neuropathies, myasthenia gravis and membranous nephropathy. Although the associated autoantibodies target specific antigens in different organs and thus cause diverse syndromes and diseases, they share surprising similarities in genetic predisposition, disease mechanisms, clinical course and response to therapies. IgG4-AID appear to be distinct from another group of rare immune diseases associated with IgG4, which are the IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RLD), such as IgG4-related which have distinct clinical and serological properties and are not characterized by antigen-specific IgG4. Importantly, IgG4-AID differ significantly from diseases associated with IgG1 autoantibodies targeting the same organ. This may be due to the unique functional characteristics of IgG4 autoantibodies (e.g. anti-inflammatory and functionally monovalent) that affect how the antibodies cause disease, and the differential response to immunotherapies of the IgG4 producing B cells/plasmablasts. These clinical and pathophysiological clues give important insight in the immunopathogenesis of IgG4-AID. Understanding IgG4 immunobiology is a key step towards the development of novel, IgG4 specific treatments. In this review we therefore summarize current knowledge on IgG4 regulation, the relevance of class switching in the context of health and disease, describe the cellular mechanisms involved in IgG4 production and provide an overview of treatment responses in IgG4-AID.

Current Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is the most extensively studied antibody-mediated disease in humans. Substantial progress has been made in the treatment of MG in the last century, resulting in a change of its natural course from a disease with poor prognosis with a high mortality rate in the early 20th century to a treatable condition with a large proportion of patients attaining very good disease control. This review summarizes the current treatment options for MG, including non-immunosuppressive and immunosuppressive treatments, as well as thymectomy and targeted immunomodulatory drugs.

Advances and challenges in the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease with fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability. Standard immunomodulatory treatment may fail to achieve sufficient improvement with minimal symptom expression or remission of myasthenic symptoms, despite adequate dosing and duration of treatment. Treatment-resistant MG poses a challenge for both patients and treating neurologists and requires new therapeutic approaches. The spectrum of upcoming immunotherapies that more specifically address distinct targets of the main immunological players in MG pathogenesis includes T-cell directed monoclonal antibodies that block the intracellular cascade associated with T-cell activation, monoclonal antibodies directed against key B-cell molecules, as well as monoclonal antibodies against the fragment crystallizable neonatal receptor (FcRn), cytokines and transmigration molecules, and also drugs that inhibit distinct elements of the complement system activated by the pathogenic MG antibodies. The review gives an overview on new drugs being evaluated in still ongoing or recently finished controlled clinical trials and drugs of potential benefit in MG due to their mechanisms of action and positive effects in other autoimmune disorders. Also, the challenges associated with the new therapeutic options are discussed briefly.

Juvenile Generalized Myasthenia Gravis With AChR and MuSK Antibody Double Positivity: A Case Report With a Review of the Literature

Myasthenia gravis is an autoimmune disease mediated by B cells and is associated with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific receptor tyrosine kinase (MuSK) antibodies in the postsynaptic membrane at the neuromuscular junction. The presence of both antibodies in the serum of patients with myasthenia gravis has been rarely reported. Case description: A 9-year-old girl was admitted to our hospital with the chief complaints of reduced facial expression for 3 months and unclear speech and choking from drinking water for 2 months. The diagnosis of generalized myasthenia gravis was made based on clinical manifestations, repetitive electrical nerve stimulation, neostigmine tests, specific antibody tests and other auxiliary examinations. We found the rare coexistence of two key antibodies (anti-AChR and anti-MuSK antibodies) in the patient's serum. The patient experienced myasthenic crisis and received respiratory support even though she was taking prednisone therapy. Due to the poor response to treatment with pyridostigmine bromide, glucocorticoids and IVIG, we administered rituximab therapy, and she responded well and achieved clinical remission. This suggests that clinicians should pay more attention to atypical cases and antibody detection. Rituximab should be considered when conventional treatment fails.

Molecular Therapy in Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder caused by antibodies that act against the myoneural junction. Conventional immunosuppressants such as corticosteroids, azathioprine and mycophenolate are associated with long-term side effects and many patients do not achieve remission and may become refractory. Thus, there is an unmet need for target-specific therapies that act faster, have fewer side effects and lead to stable disease remission. However, many of the novel therapeutic agents being described are not meeting their primary endpoints. We reviewed the current status of novel immunotherapies for MG, their mechanisms of action, along with the side effect profiles. Fast onset of action, sustained disease remission and relatively low frequency of side effects of the new agents are attractive. However, the unknown long-term safety and high cost are precluding factors. Better preclinical studies and more randomized trials are needed before novel agents are routinely employed.

Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome: New Developments in Diagnosis and Treatment

"Myasthenia Gravis is, like it or not, the neurologist's disease!" (Thomas Richards Johns II, MD Seminars in Neurology 1982). The most common disorders in clinical practice involving defective neuromuscular transmission are myasthenia gravis (MG) and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS). The hallmark of weakness related to malfunction of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is variability in severity of symptoms from minute to minute and hour to hour. Fatigable weakness and fluctuation in symptoms are common in patients whether the etiology is autoimmune, paraneoplastic, genetic, or toxic. Autoimmune MG is the most common disorder of neuromuscular transmission affecting adults with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 10,000. While LEMS is comparatively rare, the unique clinical presentation, the association with cancer, and evolving treatment strategies require the neurologist to be familiar with its presentation, diagnosis, and management. In this paper we provide a summary of the meaningful recent clinical developments in the diagnosis and treatment of both MG and LEMS.

Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapies in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Approximately 10–20% of patients WITH myasthenia gravis (MG) are refractory to conventional immunotherapies. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the optimal therapies for refractory MG.

Method: Correlative studies were performed through a search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The primary outcome was defined by changes in the quantitative myasthenia gravis score (QMG). Secondary outcomes were defined by the Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living Scale (MG-ADL), Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) post intervention status, adverse events, and disease exacerbation after treatment.

Result: A total of 16 studies were included with 403 patients with refractory MG on therapies with rituximab, eculizumab, tacrolimus, and cladribine. Therapeutic efficacy of rituximab and eculizumab was identified with an estimated reduction in QMG score (4.158 vs. 6.928) and MG-ADL (4.400 vs. 4.344), respectively. No significant changes were revealed in efficacy or exacerbation density between the two independent therapeutic cohorts. The estimated adverse event density of eculizumab was more significant than that in the rituximab group (1.195 vs. 0.134 per patient-year), while the estimated serious event density was similar.

Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of rituximab and eculizumab have been approved in patients with refractory MG. Rituximab had a superior safety profile than eculizumab with a lower incidence of adverse events.

Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021236818, identifier CRD42021236818.

Rituximab in the Management of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis and Variability of Its Efficacy in Anti-MuSK Positive and Anti-AChR Positive Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis affects the neuromuscular junction of the skeletal muscles. It results in muscle weakness involving skeletal muscles (diaphragm, extraocular muscles) and myasthenic crisis. Treatment options for myasthenia gravis management have expanded, including azathioprine, corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and tacrolimus. Unfortunately, a few cases of myasthenia gravis don't respond to conventional treatment modalities. Monoclonal antibodies, rituximab (RTX), are novel treatments that have garnered interest as of late due to their efficacy within the patient population presented with refractory form myasthenia gravis. This review aims to showcase how RTX is an effective treatment within different forms of myasthenia gravis. A limited review was performed using databases that include PubMed and Google Scholar. The following keywords were used: "myasthenia gravis," "rituximab," "monoclonal antibody," "anti-AChR antibody," and "refractory myasthenia." The review focused on case reports, human studies, or research surveys based on the inclusion criteria of human studies involving participants more than 18 years of age and published in English literature. Out of 69 articles, 14 were duplicates, and 29 were relevant and met the inclusion criteria. The findings from the study demonstrate that patients with refractory myasthenia gravis responded well to RTX treatment. Furthermore, RTX has been shown to decrease corticosteroid dependence, induce sustained remission, and have a favorable response to anti-MuSK antibody positive myasthenia gravis compared to anti-AChR antibody positive myasthenia gravis. This literature review suggests that patients with refractory myasthenia gravis can benefit from rituximab; however, it has a variable response in different forms of myasthenia gravis.

Effectiveness and Safety of Rituximab for Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis

Background and Objective: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune neuromuscular disease. Nearly 10-30% of patients with MG are refractory to conventional therapy. Rituximab (RTX), a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20, is increasingly used in autoimmune disorders. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RTX for refractory MG. Methods: Studies published between January 1, 2000 and January 17, 2021 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClincalTrails.gov. Primary outcomes included proportion of patients achieving minimal manifestation status (MMS) or better and quantitative MG (QMG) score change from baseline. Secondary outcomes were glucocorticoids (GC) doses change from baseline and proportion of patients discontinuing oral immunosuppressants. Results: A total of 24 studies involving 417 patients were included in the meta-analysis. An overall 64% (95% confidence interval, 49-77%) of patients achieved MMS or better. The estimated reduction of QMG score was 1.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.88-2.22). The mean reduction of GC doses was 1.46 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.82). The proportion of patients discontinuing oral immunosuppressants was 81% (95% confidence interval, 66-93%). Subgroup analyses showed that the proportion of patients achieving MMS or better and discontinuing oral immunosuppressants was higher in MuSK-MG group than those in AChR-MG group. Improvement was more pronounced in patients with mild to moderate MG compared to those with severe MG. Moreover, the efficacy appeared to be independent of the dose of RTX. 19.6% of patients experienced adverse events, most of which were mild to moderate. Only one patient developed progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. Conclusions: RTX can alleviate the symptom of weakness, decrease QMG score and reduce the doses of steroids and non-steroid immunosuppressive agents in refractory MG. It is well-tolerated with few severe adverse events. Randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to study the efficacy of RTX in treating refractory MG and to identify the characteristics of patients who might respond well to RTX.

Survival, Prognosis, and Clinical Feature of Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: a 15-year Nationwide Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare classic autoimmune disease where immunosuppressant therapies have been successful to reduce MG attributable mortality fairly well. However, patients with refractory MG (rMG) among the actively treated MG (aMG) are nonresponsive to conventional therapy and display high disease severity, which calls for further research. We aimed to determine survival, prognosis, and clinical feature of patients with rMG compared to non-rMG.

METHODS

Retrospective nationwide cohort study using Korea's healthcare database between 2002 and 2017 was conducted. Patients with rMG (n = 47) and non-rMG (n = 4,251) who were aged > 18 years, followed-up for ≥ 1 year, and prescribed immunosuppressants within 2 years after incident MG diagnosis were included. Patients with rMG were defined as administered plasma exchange or intravenous immunoglobulin at least 3 times per year after receiving ≥ 2 immunosuppressants. All-cause mortality, myasthenic crisis, hospitalization, pneumonia/sepsis, and emergency department (ED) visits were measured using Cox proportional hazard models and pharmacotherapy patterns for rMG were assessed.

RESULTS

The rMG cohort included a preponderance of younger patients and women. The adjusted hazard ratio was 2.49 (95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.94) for mortality, 3.14 (2.25-4.38) for myasthenic crisis, 1.54 (1.15-2.06) for hospitalization, 2.69 (1.74-4.15) for pneumonia/sepsis, and 1.81 (1.28-2.56) for ED visits for rMG versus non-rMG. The immunosuppressant prescriptions were more prevalent in patients with rMG, while the difference was more remarkable before rMG onset rather than after rMG onset.

CONCLUSION

Despite the severe prognosis of rMG, the strategies for pharmacotherapeutic regimens were similar in those two groups, suggesting that intensive monitoring and introduction of timely treatment options in the early phase of MG are required.

Immunosuppression in Multiple Sclerosis and Other Neurologic Disorders

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) characterized by peripheral immune cell infiltration into the brain and spinal cord, demyelination, glial cell activation, and neuronal damage. Currently there is no cure for MS, however, available disease-modifying agents minimize inflammation in the CNS by various mechanisms. Approved drugs lessen severity of the disease and delay disease progression, however, they are still suboptimal as patients experience adverse effects and varying efficacies. Additionally, there is only one disease-modifying therapy available for the more debilitating, progressive form of MS. This chapter focuses on the presently-available therapeutics and, importantly, the future directions of MS therapy based on preclinical studies and early clinical trials. Immunosuppression in other neurological disorders including neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders, myasthenia gravis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome is also discussed.

Zytux in Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A Multicenter, Open-Labeled, Clinical Trial Study of Effectiveness and Safety of a Rituximab Biosimilar

Objectives: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an immune-mediated neuromuscular disorder responsive to immunomodulatory treatments. 10-20% of MGs are not responsive to conventional first-line therapies. Here, we sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy in the treatment of patients with refractory MG. Methods: In a 48-week, multicenter, open-labeled, prospective cohort setting, 34 participants with refractory MG were assigned to receive infusions of Zytux, which is a rituximab biosimilar, according to a validated protocol. Clinical, functional, and quality of life (QoL) measurements were recorded at baseline, and seven further visits using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA), Myasthenia Gravis Composite (MGC), Myasthenia Gravis Activities of Daily Living profile (MG-ADL), and Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life (MGQoL-15) scales. Besides, the post-infusion side effects were systematically assessed throughout the study. Results: The correlation analysis performed by generalized estimating equations analysis represented a significant reduction of MGC, MG-ADL, and MGQoL-15 scores across the trial period. The subgroup analysis based on the patients' clinical status indicated a significant effect for the interaction between time and MGFA subtypes on MG-ADL score, MGC score, and pyridostigmine prednisolone dose, reflecting that the worse clinical condition was associated with a better response to rituximab. Finally, no serious adverse event was documented. Conclusions: Rituximab therapy could improve clinical, functional, and QoL in patients with refractory MG in a safe setting. Further investigations with larger sample size and a more extended follow-up period are warranted to confirm this finding. Clinical Trial Registration: The study was registered by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (Code No: IRCT20150303021315N18).

Retrospective analysis of safety and outcomes of rituximab for myasthenia gravis in patients ≥65 years old

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Optimal management of myasthenia gravis (MG) in individuals ≥65 y old is unknown and patient factors may limit therapeutic choices. Safety and efficacy of rituximab in older patients with MG has not been well-studied.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 40 patients (14 patients ≥65 y old) treated with rituximab for MG. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients reaching "Improved" or better on Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Post-Intervention Status (PIS) at 12 mo, compared between younger and older patients.

RESULTS

Ninety-two percent of patients ≥65 y old achieved MGFA PIS Improved or better at 12 mo compared to 69% of those <65 y old (P = .11). Median prednisone dose for the cohort decreased in the year following rituximab initiation (20 mg [interquartile range, 10-35] to 10 mg [0-13], P = .01). Non-refractory MG was predictive of favorable outcome, whereas age was not. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were similar between older and younger patients (21.4% vs. 30.8%, P = .715). No patients ≥65 y old required discontinuation of rituximab due to SAE. One death occurred in a patient <65 y old due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

DISCUSSION

At 12 mo following initiation of rituximab for MG, patients ≥65 y old experienced similarly high rates of improvement in their myasthenic symptoms as younger patients, without an increased risk of experiencing SAEs. Rituximab should be considered in the treatment paradigm in older patients and in non-refractory MG patients of any age.

Heterogeneity in myasthenia gravis: considerations for disease management

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis is a rare disease of the neuromuscular junction and a prototype of B cell-driven immunopathology. Pathogenic antibodies target post-synaptic transmembrane proteins, most commonly the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor and the muscle-specific tyrosine kinase, inducing end-plate alterations and neuromuscular transmission impairment. Several clinical subtypes are distinct on the basis of associated antibodies, age at symptom onset, thymus pathology, genetic factors, and weakness distribution. These subtypes have distinct pathogenesis that can account for different responses to treatment. Conventional therapy is based on the use of symptomatic agents, steroids, immunosuppressants and thymectomy. Of late, biologics have emerged as effective therapeutic options.Areas covered: In this review, we will discuss the management of myasthenia gravis in relation to its phenotypic and biological heterogeneity, in the light of recent advances in the disease immunopathology, new diagnostic tools, and results of clinical trialsExpert opinion: Clinical management is shaped on serological subtype, and patient age at onset, lifestyle and comorbidities, balancing therapeutic needs and safety. Although reliable biomarkers predictive of clinical and biologic outcome are still lacking, recent developments promise a more effective and safe treatment. Disease subtyping according to serological testing and immunopathology is crucial to the appropriateness of clinical management.

Short- and Long-Lived Autoantibody-Secreting Cells in Autoimmune Neurological Disorders

As B cells differentiate into antibody-secreting cells (ASCs), short-lived plasmablasts (SLPBs) are produced by a primary extrafollicular response, followed by the generation of memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells (LLPCs) in germinal centers (GCs). Generation of IgG4 antibodies is T helper type 2 (Th2) and IL-4, -13, and -10-driven and can occur parallel to IgE, in response to chronic stimulation by allergens and helminths. Although IgG4 antibodies are non-crosslinking and have limited ability to mobilize complement and cellular cytotoxicity, when self-tolerance is lost, they can disrupt ligand-receptor binding and cause a wide range of autoimmune disorders including neurological autoimmunity. In myasthenia gravis with predominantly IgG4 autoantibodies against muscle-specific kinase (MuSK), it has been observed that one-time CD20⁺ B cell depletion with rituximab commonly leads to long-term remission and a marked reduction in autoantibody titer, pointing to a short-lived nature of autoantibody-secreting cells. This is also observed in other predominantly IgG4 autoantibody-mediated neurological disorders, such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy and autoimmune encephalitis with autoantibodies against the Ranvier paranode and juxtaparanode, respectively, and extends beyond neurological autoimmunity as well. Although IgG1 autoantibody-mediated neurological disorders can also respond well to rituximab induction therapy in combination with an autoantibody titer drop, remission tends to be less long-lasting and cases where titers are refractory tend to occur more often than in IgG4 autoimmunity. Moreover, presence of GC-like structures in the thymus of myasthenic patients with predominantly IgG1 autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor and in ovarian teratomas of autoimmune encephalitis patients with predominantly IgG1 autoantibodies against the N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR) confers increased the ability to generate LLPCs. Here, we review available information on the short-and long-lived nature of ASCs in IgG1 and IgG4 autoantibody-mediated neurological disorders and highlight common mechanisms as well as differences, all of which can inform therapeutic strategies and personalized medical approaches.

Effective Early Treatment of AChR Antibody-Positive Myasthenia Gravis with Rituximab; the Experience from a Neuroimmunology Clinic in a Developing Country

Background

Rituximab is reserved for treating refractory myasthenia gravis (MG) patients. Here we report our experience with rituximab in AChR antibody positive generalized MG (gMG) and impending myasthenic crisis (IMC).

Methods

This retrospective, observational study, conducted at a tertiary care, neuroimmunology clinic, analyzed the data of patients with AChR antibody positive gMG, treated with rituximab between 1st January 2016 and 30th October 2018.

Results

Eleven patients with AChR antibody positive gMG received rituximab. Mean age of the cohort was 50.54 ± 18.71 years with 9 males. Seven out of 11 patients received rituximab in the early stage (<2 years from onset) and had good response to treatment. Four of the 5 patients with IMC improved with rituximab alone. In the 10 patients who regularly followed up, there was a significant difference between the QMG scores at baseline and at 1, 2, 6, 12, and 18 months (P < .0001).

Conclusion

Rituximab appears to be a potentially effective early treatment option for AChR antibody positive generalized MG and impending myasthenic crisis.

What's in the Neuromuscular Junction Literature?

Four retrospective studies from the United States, Europe, and Asia address outcomes in juvenile myasthenia gravis. Common features include earlier onset with ocular myasthenia gravis (MG) and generally good outcomes overall. Patients who were seronegative, had equivocal acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies, or had only clustered AChR antibodies had better outcomes. An article highlighting the utility of median nerve slow-repetitive stimulation is reviewed and another showing the high sensitivity of repetitive nerve stimulation in myasthenic crisis is covered. Two articles address the thymus and thymectomy in non-AChR antibody-positive autoimmune MG. Longer term data on eculizumab as well as studies of cyclophosphamide, rituximab, and tacrolimus are summarized. Other topics include the possible role of statins in MG and central nervous system autoimmune comorbidities.

Rituximab in Myasthenia Gravis - Where do we stand?

Introduction: Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an antibody-mediated disease with diverse serology and clinical presentation. Currently, MG is managed by untargeted immunomodulatory agents. About 15% patients are refractory to these therapies. Several novel and targeted treatments are on the horizon. Rituximab, a monoclonal antibody, is reported to be highly effective with widespread oof-label usage in MG, particularly in patients with antibody against muscle-specific kinase or refractory disease. However, a recent trial showed negative results. Compared to conventional oral immunosuppressive therapies used in MG, Rituximab has several benefits. Regular hematological monitoring is not required though serious side effects can occur. Current status of Rituximab in MG and newer immunosuppressants is discussed.Areas explored: Biologic features, clinical effectiveness, safety profile, and newer preparations of Rituximab.Expert opinion: Rituximab provides a promising option for management of MG, particularly in patients with muscle-specific kinase antibodies or those with refractory disease. Several knowledge gaps remain due to scarcity of data from randomized controlled studies. Despite lack of regulatory approval Rituximab has found widespread usage in MG. Large, well-designed studies are needed to assess the comparative efficacy of Rituximab and its optimal regimen in MG.

Comparison Between Rituximab Treatment for New-Onset Generalized Myasthenia Gravis and Refractory Generalized Myasthenia Gravis

Importance

Use of biologic agents in generalized myasthenia gravis is generally limited to therapy-refractory cases; benefit in new-onset disease is unknown.

Objective

To assess rituximab in refractory and new-onset generalized myasthenia gravis and rituximab vs conventional immunotherapy in new-onset disease.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study with prospectively collected data was conducted on a county-based community sample at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. Participants included 72 patients with myasthenia gravis, excluding those displaying muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies, initiating rituximab treatment from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2018, and patients with new-onset disease initiating conventional immunotherapy from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012, with 12 months or more of observation time. The present study was conducted from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020.

Exposures

Treatment with low-dose rituximab (most often 500 mg every 6 months) or conventional immunosuppressants.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Time to remission (main outcome) as well as use of rescue therapies or additional immunotherapies and time in remission (secondary outcomes).

Results

Of the 72 patients included, 31 patients (43%) were women; mean (SD) age at treatment start was 60 (18) years. Twenty-four patients had received rituximab within 12 months of disease onset and 48 received rituximab at a later time, 34 of whom had therapy-refractory disease. A total of 26 patients (3 [12%] women; mean [SD] age, 68 [11] years at treatment start) received conventional immunosuppressant therapy. Median time to remission was shorter for new-onset vs refractory disease (7 vs 16 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.53; 95% CI, 1.26-5.07; P = .009 after adjustment for age, sex, and disease severity) and for rituximab vs conventional immunosuppressant therapies (7 vs 11 months: HR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.43-6.18; P = .004 after adjustment). In addition, fewer rescue therapy episodes during the first 24 months were required (mean [SD], 0.38 [1.10] vs 1.31 [1.59] times; mean difference, -1.26; 95% CI, -1.97 to -0.56; P < .001 after adjustment), and a larger proportion of patients had minimal or no need of additional immunotherapies (70% vs 35%; OR, 5.47; 95% CI, 1.40-21.43; P = .02 after adjustment). Rates of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events were lower with rituximab compared with conventional therapies (3% vs 46%; P < .001 after adjustment).

Conclusions and Relevance

Clinical outcomes with rituximab appeared to be more favorable in new-onset generalized myasthenia gravis, and rituximab also appeared to perform better than conventional immunosuppressant therapy. These findings suggest a relatively greater benefit of rituximab earlier in the disease course. A placebo-controlled randomized trial to corroborate these findings is warranted.

A Sum Score to Define Therapy-Refractory Myasthenia Gravis: A German Consensus

Background and purpose

In 2017, eculizumab has been approved for treatment-refractory generalised myasthenia gravis (TRgMG). The German Myasthenia Foundation has published a consensus statement on the use of eculizumab, with a recent update. However, a treatment-refractory state is still ill-defined and the term warrants further clarification. We aimed at developing a sum score to operationalise the definition of a TRgMG status, which is easy- to-handle in clinical decision making.

Methods

We established a structured consensus process according to the Delphi consensus methodology, with 12 members of the medical advisory board of the German Myasthenia Foundation. Accordingly, 4 consensus rounds were accomplished. Additionally, a literature survey covering the years 2004-2020 was done and relevant information offered to the consensus group. Consensus criteria were predefined. In the consensus process the relative importance of scoring items were to be consented, with a sum score of 20 and above indicating a TRgMG status.

Results

The sum score considers the categories disease severity, inefficiency of antecedent therapies, cessation of therapies due to side effects, and long term stay on the intensive care unit. Categories were specified by a total of 13 scoring items. Eventually, the Delphi process developed an unanimous scoring consensus.

Conclusion

We suggest a sum score to define treatment refractory state in generalised myasthenia gravis. Beyond clarifying the indication of eculizumab, this easy-to-handle score facilitates clinical decision making and offers new inclusion criteria for clinical studies that explore new therapeutic perspectives in myasthenia gravis treatment.

Efficacy and safety of different dosages of rituximab for refractory generalized AChR myasthenia gravis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rituximab (RTX) is a mouse-human chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and has been increasingly used for preventing relapses in myasthenia gravis (MG). However, the appropriate dose for maximizing the beneficial effects in refractory MG with acetylcholine receptor (AChR) autoantibody is a long-standing and critical debating question.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the different doses of RTX in 260 refractory AChR-MG patients.

RESULTS

The AChR-MG patients were divided into low or routine RTX dose groups. An overall proportion of 77% (p = 0.000) AChR-MG patients demonstrated improved clinical status as indicated by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post-intervention scale (MGFA-PIS). There were 77.1% patients showed improved clinical status in lower dose of RTX group (p = 0.000) and 76.8% in routine protocol group (p = 0.000). Although we found there was no significant difference in the proportion of AChR-MG patients with improved clinical status or adverse reactions between the two groups, adverse reactions might be lower in the lower dose RTX group.

CONCLUSION

Most of refractory MG patients with anti-AChR autoantibody were well responsive and tolerated to RTX treatment. Repeated application of lower dose of RTX was effective and might be more appropriate for refractory AChR-MG patients with potential lower side effects.

Controversies in Ocular Myasthenia Gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) with symptoms limited to eye muscles [ocular MG (OMG)] is a rare disease. OMG incidence varies according to ethnicity and age of onset. In recent years, both an increase in incidence rate, particularly in the elderly, and a lower risk for secondary generalization may have contributed to the growing disease prevalence in Western countries. OMG should be considered in patients with painless ptosis and extrinsic ophthalmoparesis. Though asymmetric muscle involvement and symptom fluctuations are typical, in some cases, OMG can mimic isolated cranial nerve paresis, internuclear ophthalmoplegia, and conjugate gaze palsy. Diagnostic confirmation can be challenging in patients negative for anti-acetylcholine receptor and anti-muscle-specific tyrosine kinase antibodies on standard radioimmunoassay. Early treatment is aimed at relieving symptoms and at preventing disease progression to generalized MG. Despite the absence of high-level evidence, there is general agreement on the efficacy of steroids at low to moderate dosage; immunosuppressants are considered when steroid high maintenance doses are required. The role of thymectomy in non-thymoma patients is controversial. Prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive therapy has a negative impact on the health-related quality of life in a proportion of these patients. OMG is currently excluded from most of the treatments recently developed in generalized MG.

International Consensus Guidance for Management of Myasthenia Gravis: 2020 Update

Objective

To update the 2016 formal consensus-based guidance for the management of myasthenia gravis (MG) based on the latest evidence in the literature.

Methods

In October 2013, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America appointed a Task Force to develop treatment guidance for MG, and a panel of 15 international experts was convened. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used to develop consensus recommendations pertaining to 7 treatment topics. In February 2019, the international panel was reconvened with the addition of one member to represent South America. All previous recommendations were reviewed for currency, and new consensus recommendations were developed on topics that required inclusion or updates based on the recent literature. Up to 3 rounds of anonymous e-mail votes were used to reach consensus, with modifications to recommendations between rounds based on the panel input. A simple majority vote (80% of panel members voting “yes”) was used to approve minor changes in grammar and syntax to improve clarity.

Results

The previous recommendations for thymectomy were updated. New recommendations were developed for the use of rituximab, eculizumab, and methotrexate as well as for the following topics: early immunosuppression in ocular MG and MG associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment.

Conclusion

This updated formal consensus guidance of international MG experts, based on new evidence, provides recommendations to clinicians caring for patients with MG worldwide.