Seizures associated with antibodies against cell surface antigens are acute symptomatic and not indicative of epilepsy: insights from long-term data

LGI1 encephalitis: potentially complement-activating anti-LGI1-IgG subclasses 1/2/3 are associated with the development of hippocampal sclerosis

Two-thirds of published patients with anti-leucine rich, glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis develop hippocampal sclerosis (HS). It is likely that this contributes to residual cognitive long-term deficits and the risk of epilepsy. Almost all patients harbor anti-LGI1-immunoglobulin G-(IgG-) subclass 4, which is considered a "benign", non-destructive subclass. In contrast, neuropathological case studies have suggested that the classical complement cascade may contribute to mediotemporal cell death in patients with LGI1 antibodies. IgG subclasses 1, 2, or 3 are required to initiate this cascade. We hypothesized that patients with these anti-LGI1-IgG1/2/3 in addition to IgG4 have a higher risk of developing HS than patients with anti-LGI1-IgG4 alone. We retrospectively assessed all anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients from this center with anti-LGI1-IgG-subclass information and follow-up MRI available. Nine out of 20 patients had developed HS (45%). Volumetric FreeSurfer analysis confirmed the visual HS diagnoses. HS and a lower hippocampal volume were associated with anti-LGI1-IgG1/2/3. All six patients with this IgG subclass status developed HS. There was no association with older or younger age at onset, female sex, longer latency from disease onset to start of immunotherapy, less intense immunotherapy, higher serum titers of LGI1 antibodies, LGI1 antibodies in CSF or higher LGI1-specific antibody indices. There was no association between anti-LGI1-IgG1/2/3 status and neuropsychological performance, epilepsy, or general neurological performance. This confirms our hypothesis that anti-LGI1-IgG1/2/3 in serum puts patients at risk of developing HS. If these findings can be confirmed and clinically corroborated, patients with anti-LGI1-IgG1/2/3 might become candidates for anti-complement-directed immunological treatments.

Risk of Seizure Recurrence Due to Autoimmune Encephalitis With NMDAR, LGI1, CASPR2, and GABABR Antibodies: Implications for Return to Driving

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with ongoing seizures are usually not allowed to drive. The prognosis for seizure freedom is favorable in patients with autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) with antibodies against NMDA receptor (NMDAR), leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1), contactin-associated protein-like 2 (CASPR2), and the gamma-aminobutyric-acid B receptor (GABABR). We hypothesized that after a seizure-free period of 3 months, patients with AIE have a seizure recurrence risk of <20% during the subsequent 12 months. This would render them eligible for noncommercial driving according to driving regulations in several countries.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter cohort study analyzed follow-up data from patients aged 15 years or older with seizures resulting from NMDAR-, LGI1-, CASPR2-, or GABABR-AIE, who had been seizure-free for ≥3 months. We used Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates for the seizure recurrence risk at 12 months for each antibody group and tested for the effects of potential covariates with regression models.

RESULTS

We included 383 patients with NMDAR-, 440 with LGI1-, 114 with CASPR2-, and 44 with GABABR-AIE from 14 international centers. After being seizure-free for 3 months after an initial seizure period, we calculated the probability of remaining seizure-free for another 12 months (KM estimate) as 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-0.92) for NMDAR, 0.84 (CI 0.80-0.88) for LGI1, 0.82 (CI 0.75-0.90) for CASPR2, and 0.76 (CI 0.62-0.93) for GABABR.

DISCUSSION

Taking a <20% recurrence risk within 12 months as sufficient, patients with NMDAR-AIE and LGI1-AIE could be considered eligible for noncommercial driving after having been seizure-free for 3 months.

Brazilian consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune encephalitis in the adult and pediatric populations

BACKGROUND

 Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) is a group of inflammatory diseases characterized by the presence of antibodies against neuronal and glial antigens, leading to subacute psychiatric symptoms, memory complaints, and movement disorders. The patients are predominantly young, and delays in treatment are associated with worse prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

 With the support of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (Academia Brasileira de Neurologia, ABN) and the Brazilian Society of Child Neurology (Sociedade Brasileira de Neurologia Infantil, SBNI), a consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of AIE in Brazil was developed using the Delphi method.

METHODS

 A total of 25 panelists, including adult and child neurologists, participated in the study.

RESULTS

 The panelists agreed that patients fulfilling criteria for possible AIE should be screened for antineuronal antibodies in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using the tissue-based assay (TBA) and cell-based assay (CBA) techniques. Children should also be screened for anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glucoprotein antibodies (anti-MOG). Treatment should be started within the first 4 weeks of symptoms. The first-line option is methylprednisolone plus intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis, the second-line includes rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide, while third-line treatment options are bortezomib and tocilizumab. Most seizures in AIE are symptomatic, and antiseizure medications may be weaned after the acute stage. In anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis, the panelists have agreed that oral immunosuppressant agents should not be used. Patients should be evaluated at the acute and postacute stages using functional and cognitive scales, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and the Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE).

CONCLUSION

 The present study provides tangible evidence for the effective management of AIE patients within the Brazilian healthcare system.

Autoimmune-associated seizure disorders

With the discovery of an expanding number of neural autoantibodies, autoimmune etiologies of seizures have been increasingly recognized. Clinical phenotypes have been identified in association with specific underlying antibodies, allowing an earlier diagnosis. These phenotypes include faciobrachial dystonic seizures with LGI1 encephalitis, neuropsychiatric presentations associated with movement disorders and seizures in NMDA-receptor encephalitis, and chronic temporal lobe epilepsy in GAD65 neurologic autoimmunity. Prompt recognition of these disorders is important, as some of them are highly responsive to immunotherapy. The response to immunotherapy is highest in patients with encephalitis secondary to antibodies targeting cell surface synaptic antigens. However, the response is less effective in conditions involving antibodies binding intracellular antigens or in Rasmussen syndrome, which are predominantly mediated by cytotoxic T-cell processes that are associated with irreversible cellular destruction. Autoimmune encephalitides also may have a paraneoplastic etiology, further emphasizing the importance of recognizing these disorders. Finally, autoimmune processes and responses to novel immunotherapies have been reported in new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), warranting their inclusion in any current review of autoimmune-associated seizure disorders.

Predictive value of persistent antibodies at 6 months for relapse in neuronal surface antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis

BACKGROUND

For patients with neuronal surface antibody-associated autoimmune encephalitis (NSAE) whose clinical symptoms gradually improve, the recommended course of immunotherapy in China is about 6 months. We aim to explore the relationship between persistent antibody positivity when immunotherapy is discontinued at 6 months and subsequent relapse.

METHODS

Prospective inclusion of NSAE patients with clinical remission after 6-month immunotherapy. Their antibody titers and other clinical data were collected at onset and 6 months later. Based on the antibody test results at 6 months, patients were divided into an antibody-persistent group and an antibody-negative conversion group, and then the rate of relapse between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The study included 28 NSAE patients who were antibody-positive at diagnosis. After 6-month immunotherapy, there were 16 (57.1%) cases with persistent antibodies and 12 (42.9%) cases with antibody-negative conversion. In the acute phase of onset, seizures were more common in patients with persistent antibodies (87.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.044). During a mean follow-up period of 22 months, patients with persistent antibodies were more likely to experience relapse than those with antibody-negative conversion (37.5% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.024). There were no significant differences in antibody types, CSF findings, results of MRI and EEG, tumor combination, immunotherapy, and long-term outcome between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with persistent antibodies when immunotherapy is discontinued at 6 months, persistent antibody positivity was associated with a higher relapse rate.

Low prevalence of neural autoantibodies in perioperative cerebrospinal fluid samples of epilepsy surgery patients: A multicenter prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Refractory epilepsy may have an underlying autoimmune etiology. Our aim was to assess the prevalence of neural autoantibodies in a multicenter national prospective cohort of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing epilepsy surgery utilizing comprehensive clinical, serologic, and histopathological analyses.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients undergoing epilepsy surgery for refractory focal epilepsy not caused by a brain tumor from epilepsy surgery centers in the Czech Republic. Perioperatively, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and/or serum samples and performed comprehensive commercial and in-house assays for neural autoantibodies. Clinical data were obtained from the patients' medical records, and histopathological analysis of resected brain tissue was performed.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included, mostly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-lesional cases (74%). Mean time from diagnosis to surgery was 21 ± 13 years. Only one patient (1.3%) had antibodies in the CSF and serum (antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase 65) in relevant titers; histology revealed focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) III (FCD associated with hippocampal sclerosis [HS]). Five patients' samples displayed CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands (OCBs; 6.6%): three cases with FCD (one with FCD II and two with FCD I), one with HS, and one with negative histology. Importantly, eight patients (one of them with CSF-restricted OCBs) had findings on antibody testing in individual serum and/or CSF tests that could not be confirmed by complementary tests and were thus classified as nonspecific, yet could have been considered specific without confirmatory testing. Of these, two had FCD, two gliosis, and four HS. No inflammatory changes or lymphocyte cuffing was observed histopathologically in any of the 76 patients.

SIGNIFICANCE

Neural autoantibodies are a rare finding in perioperatively collected serum and CSF of our cohort of mostly MRI-lesional epilepsy surgery patients. Confirmatory testing is essential to avoid overinterpretation of autoantibody-positive findings.

A hospital-based retrospective study: early recognition of neuronal surface antibodies by clinical manifestations and CSF inflammation indicators in patients with unexplained epilepsy

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of actual and comprehensive data on the detection rate of neuronal surface antibodies in patients with unexplained epilepsy in China. Thus, we attempted to analyze the differences in clinical manifestations, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) characteristics, seizure types and other aspects of antibody-positive and negative patients, to identify suspected antibody-positive epilepsy patients.

METHODS

In total, 137 inpatients with unexplained epilepsy were consecutively included, and neuronal surface antibodies (NSAbs) were detected by serological and/or CSF evaluations. The clinical features and seizure characteristics were analyzed between the NSAb-positive and negative patients. In addition, patients were divided into four groups based on CSF and blood antibody titers. CSF cell count and protein content were analyzed in relation to antibody titers.

RESULTS

There were 45 (32.8%) patients tested positive for antibodies. Multivariate analyses revealed that age, mental status changes or memory deterioration, CSF protein, CSF cell count, treatment, days of hospitalization, outcome, duration of symptoms before hospitalization, status epilepticus, and number of antiepileptic drugs were significantly associated with the NSAb-positive group and changes in inflammatory indicators in routine CSF analysis were associated with antibody titers.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively high proportion of patients with unexplained epilepsy have positive NSAbs. Patients with the above clinical characteristics need to be highly suspected of NSAbs positivity and should be tested for antibodies in time to assist treatment. The decrease of CSF cell count and protein content has suggestive value for the decrease of antibody titer, which should be evaluated in the follow-up.

What is autoimmune encephalitis-associated epilepsy? Proposal of a practical definition

Seizures resulting from cerebral autoimmunity are either acutely symptomatic in the context of autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) with neural surface antibodies, or they are indicative of an enduring predisposition to seizures, that is, epilepsy. Here, we propose a practical definition for autoimmune encephalitis-associated epilepsy (AEAE): Seizures associated with antibodies against glutamic acid decarboxylase, paraneoplastic syndromes, or Rasmussen encephalitis are classified as AEAE. AEAE secondary to AIE with antibodies against the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, leucine-rich glioma inactivated protein 1, contactin-associated protein-2, or γ-aminobutyric acid-B receptor can be diagnosed if the following criteria are met: seizures persist for at least 2 years after immunotherapy initiation; no signs of encephalitis on magnetic resonance imaging and no fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography hypermetabolism; normal cerebrospinal fluid cell count; and a substantial decrease in antibody titers. This classification corresponds to different disease mechanisms. While AIE results from the pathogenic effects of neural antibodies, AEAE is probably the consequence of encephalitis-related tissue damage and thereby mainly structurally mediated. The distinction between AIE and AEAE also has practical consequences: In AIE, immunotherapy is usually highly beneficial, whereas anti-seizure medication has little effect. In AEAE, immunotherapy is less promising and the usual anti-seizure interventions are preferable. In addition, the diagnosis of AEAE has social consequences in terms of driving and professional limitations.

Seizure characteristics and outcomes in patients with neurological conditions related to high-risk paraneoplastic antibodies

OBJECTIVE

Seizures are a common manifestation of paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. The objective of this study was to describe the seizure characteristics and outcomes in patients with high-risk paraneoplastic autoantibodies (>70% cancer association) and to determine factors associated with ongoing seizures.

METHODS

Patients from 2000 to 2020 with seizures and high-risk paraneoplastic autoantibodies were retrospectively identified. Factors associated with ongoing seizures at last follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were identified (34 males, median age at presentation = 52 years). ANNA1-IgG (Hu; n = 24, 39%), Ma2-IgG (n = 14, 23%), and CRMP5-IgG (CV2; n = 11, 18%) were the most common underlying antibodies. Seizures were the initial presenting symptom in 26 (43%), and malignancy was present in 38 (63%). Seizures persisted for >1 month in 83%, and 60% had ongoing seizures, with almost all patients (55/60, 92%) still being on antiseizure medications at last follow-up a median of 25 months after seizure onset. Ongoing seizures at last follow-up were associated with Ma2-IgG or ANNA1-IgG compared to other antibodies (p = .04), highest seizure frequency being at least daily (p = .0002), seizures on electroencephalogram (EEG; p = .03), and imaging evidence of limbic encephalitis (LE; p = .03). Death occurred in 48% throughout the course of follow-up, with a higher mortality in patients with LE than in those without LE (p = .04). Of 31 surviving patients at last follow-up, 55% continued to have intermittent seizures.

SIGNIFICANCE

Seizures in the setting of high-risk paraneoplastic antibodies are frequently resistant to treatment. Ongoing seizures are associated with ANNA1-IgG and Ma2-IgG, high seizure frequency, and EEG and imaging abnormalities. Although a subset of patients may respond to immunotherapy and achieve seizure freedom, poor outcomes are frequently encountered. Death was more common among patients with LE.

How autoimmunity changed our diagnostic practice in epileptology?

Since few years, a new etiology of epilepsy emerges with the labelling of new autoantibodies against the central nervous system. In 2017, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) concluded that autoimmunity is one of six etiologies contributing to epilepsy and that autoimmune epilepsy is directly caused by immune disorders in which seizures constitute a core symptom. Epileptic disorders of immune origin are now distinguished in two different entities: acute symptomatic seizures secondary to autoimmune (ASS) and autoimmune-associated epilepsy (AAE) with different expected clinical outcome under immunotherapy. If acute encephalitis is usually related to ASS with a classic good control of the disease under immunotherapy, clinical phenotype characterized by isolated seizures (new onset seizures and chronic focal epilepsy patients) may be due to either ASS or to AAE. Decision of Abs testing and early immunotherapy initiation needs the development of clinical scores able to select patients with high risk of positive Abs testings. If this selection is now included in the usual medical care of encephalitic patients, specifically with NORSE, the actual bigger challenge is in patients with non or only mild encephalitic symptoms followed for new onset seizures or chronic focal epilepsy patients of unknown origin. The emergence of this new entity provides new therapeutic strategies with specific etiologic and probably anti epileptogenic medication rather than the usual and nonspecific ASM. In the world of the epileptology, this new autoimmune entity appears as a big challenge with an exciting chance to improve or even definitely cure patients of their epilepsy. However, the detection of these patients has to be done in the early phase of the disease to offer the best outcome.

Immune Mechanisms in Epileptogenesis: Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Epilepsy Syndromes

Seizures and epilepsy can result from various aetiologies, yet the underlying cause of several epileptic syndromes remains unclear. In that regard, autoimmune-mediated pathophysiological mechanisms have been gaining attention in the past years and were included as one of the six aetiologies of seizures in the most recent classification of the International League Against Epilepsy. The increasing number of anti-neuronal antibodies identified in patients with encephalitic disorders has contributed to the establishment of an immune-mediated pathophysiology in many cases of unclear aetiology of epileptic syndromes. Yet only a small number of patients with autoimmune encephalitis develop epilepsy in the proper sense where the brain transforms into a state where it will acquire the enduring propensity to produce seizures if it is not hindered by interventions. Hence, the term autoimmune epilepsy is often wrongfully used in the context of autoimmune encephalitis since most of the seizures are acute encephalitis-associated and will abate as soon as the encephalitis is in remission. Given the overlapping clinical presentation of immune-mediated seizures originating from different aetiologies, a clear distinction among the aetiological entities is crucial when it comes to discussing pathophysiological mechanisms, therapeutic options, and long-term prognosis of patients. Moreover, a rapid and accurate identification of patients with immune-mediated epilepsy syndromes is required to ensure an early targeted treatment and, thereby, improve clinical outcome. In this article, we review our current understanding of pathogenesis and critically discuss current and potential novel treatment options for seizures and epilepsy syndromes of underlying or suspected immune-mediated origin. We further outline the challenges in proper terminology.

Use of anti-seizure medications in different types of autoimmune encephalitis: A narrative review

Seizures are the main manifestation of the acute phase of autoimmune encephalitis (AE). Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) play an important role in controlling seizures in AE patients, but there is currently a lack of consensus regarding the selection, application, and discontinuation of ASMs. This narrative review focuses on the use of ASMs in patients with AE driven by different antibodies. The PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases were searched up until 30 October 2022 using prespecified search terms. We identified 2,580 studies; 23 retrospective studies, 2 prospective studies and 9 case reports were evaluated based on our inclusion criteria. Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartic-acid-receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is the type of AE that responds best to ASMs, and long-term or combined use of ASMs may be not required in most patients with seizures; these results apply to both adults and children. Sodium channel blockers may be the best option for seizures in anti-leucine-rich-glioma-inactivated-1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis, but patients with anti-LGI1 encephalitis are prone to side effects when using ASMs. Cell surface antibody-mediated AE patients are more likely to use ASMs for a long period than patients with intracellular antibody-mediated AE. Clinicians can score AE patients' clinical characteristics on a scale to identify those who may require long-or short-term use of ASMs in the early stage. This review provides some recommendations for the rational use of ASMs in encephalitis mediated by different antibodies with the aim of controlling seizures and avoiding overtreatment.

Do the neurologists recognize autoimmune epilepsy well enough? What is the effect of the pandemic on this matter?

Introduction

The concept of “autoimmune epilepsy” (AE) has been emphasized more frequently through the recent increase in recognition of various autoantibodies specific to neuronal proteins.

Aims

To evaluate the attitudes of neurologists in regard to AE, to review the differential diagnosis, treatment options, and to reveal the effect of COVID-19 on this matter.

Methods

A detailed questionnaire prepared for AE was sent to neurologists via social media and WhatsApp after the approval of the Ethics Committee. The responses of 245 respondents working in different settings were analyzed, and the group with 15 years or less experience in neurology was statistically compared to the group with more than 15 years of experience.

Results

Awareness and knowledge levels on AE seemed high in all groups, while 11% had never thought about AE during the differential diagnosis in real life. Before starting treatment, 20% thought that the autoantibody result should definitely support it, and 77.6% reported that they did not recognize AE well. Participants stated that satisfactory guidelines for diagnosis and treatment (88.2%) and widespread laboratory support (83.7%) were lacking. Neurologists with less experience and those working outside of training hospitals get more often consultation from an experienced clinician while diagnosing and conduct more detailed investigations at the diagnosis stage (p = 0.0025, p = 0.0001).

Conclusion

This first survey study conducted in a large group of neurologists on the attitudes for the concept of AE suggested that postgraduate education, and diagnostic and treatment guidelines should be organized and antibody screening tests need to be better disseminated.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-06044-5.

Epileptic phenotypes in autoimmune encephalitis: from acute symptomatic seizures to autoimmune-associated epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the clinical and paraclinical findings, treatment options and long-term outcomes in autoimmune encephalitis (AE), with a close look to epilepsy.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational cohort study, we enrolled patients with new-onset seizures in the context of AE. We compared clinical and paraclinical findings in patients with and without evidence of antibodies.

RESULTS

Overall, 263 patients (138 females; median age 55 years, range 4-86) were followed up for a median time of 30 months (range 12-120). Antineuronal antibodies were detected in 63.50%.Antibody-positive patients had multiple seizure types (p=0.01) and prevalent involvement of temporal regions (p=0.02). A higher prevalence of episodes of SE was found in the antibody-negative group (p<0.001).Immunotherapy was prescribed in 88.60%, and effective in 61.80%. Independent predictors of favourable outcome of the AE were early immunotherapy (p<0.001) and the detection of antineuronal surface antibodies (p=0.01).Autoimmune-associated epilepsy was the long-term sequela in 43.73%, associated with cognitive and psychiatric disturbances in 81.73%. Independent predictors of developing epilepsy were difficult to treat seizures at onset (p=0.04), a high number of antiseizure medications (p<0.001), persisting interictal epileptiform discharges at follow-up (p<0.001) and poor response to immunotherapy during the acute phase (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The recognition of seizures secondary to AE represents a rare chance for aetiology-driven seizures management. Early recognition and treatment at the pathogenic level may reduce the risk of long-term irreversible sequelae. However, the severity of seizures at onset is the major risk factor for the development of chronic epilepsy.This study provides class IV evidence for management recommendations.

Inflammation in pediatric epilepsies: Update on clinical features and treatment options

The role of inflammation is increasingly recognized in triggering or sustaining epileptic activity. In the last decades, increasing research has provided definite evidence to support the link between immunity, inflammatory process, and epilepsy. Neuro- and systemic inflammation play a pivotal role in driving epileptogenesis through different pathogenetic mechanisms: the activation of innate immunity in glia, neurons, and microvasculature, the brain mediated by blood-brain barrier (BBB) impairment, and the imbalance of pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules produced by both arms of immunity. More recently, research has focused on the adverse effects of maternal or early-life immune activation and cytokine imbalance on fetal neurodevelopment and postnatal epilepsy. A complex crosstalk between the immune and nervous system, and a crucial interplay of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors may influence structures and functions of the developing brain. A better understanding of the inflammatory process in promoting epilepsy implies that targeting specific pathways may be effective in seizure control. Multiple targets have been identified so far, and several antiseizure interventions are obtained by inhibiting inflammatory signaling or protecting/restoring BBB. All this evidence has changed the field of epilepsy research and neuropharmacology. Further developments and new treatments will rapidly emerge to improve seizure management in inflammation-related epilepsies. This article is part of the Special Issue "Severe Infantile Epilepsies".

Long-term evolution and prognostic factors of epilepsy in limbic encephalitis with LGI1 antibodies

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the evolution of epilepsy in patients with leucine-rich glioma inactivated 1 antibody-associated (LGI1ab) limbic encephalitis, including factors associated with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with LGI1 encephalitis managed at two tertiary epilepsy centers between 2005 and 2019 and whose samples were confirmed by the French Reference Center of Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes. Raw clinical, biological, EEG, and MRI data were reviewed. Two endpoints were defined: (i) Epilepsy remission: patients seizure free and in whom anti-seizure medications (ASM) have been stopped for at least 1 year at the last follow-up visit (ii) DRE: patients with persistent seizures at the last follow-up despite at least two ASM used at efficacious daily dose.

RESULTS

39 patients with LGI1 encephalitis were included with a median follow-up duration of 42 months (range 13-169). All of them reported seizures at the acute phase, with faciobrachial dystonic seizures (FBDS) in 23 (59%) and other focal seizures in 38 (97%), including 4 patients (10%) with de novo status epilepticus. At the last follow-up visit, 11 patients (28%) achieved epilepsy remission. Among the 28 patients with persistent epilepsy, eight (29%) fulfilled criteria of DRE. The only factor significantly associated with epilepsy remission was the time from clinical onset of the encephalitis to initiation of the first immunomodulatory treatment, with longer delay in patients with persistent epilepsy (7.5 ± 8.9 vs 2.4 ± 1.7 months, p = 0.006). Evolution to DRE was only driven by MRI evolution. Eight of the 15 patients (53%) who developed hippocampal atrophy (p = 0.007) also suffered from drug-resistant seizures at the last follow-up.

SIGNIFICANCE

In patients with LGI1 encephalitis, rapid initiation of immunomodulatory treatment favors long-term epilepsy remission. Evolution to DRE might primarily reflect the anatomical lesion of limbic structures. Determining what modalities of immune treatment may alter these outcomes requires prospective studies with long-term follow-up.

Limbic encephalitis

Limbic encephalitis (LE) is a clinical syndrome defined by subacutely evolving limbic signs and symptoms with structural and functional evidence of mediotemporal damage in the absence of a better explanation than an autoimmune (or paraneoplastic) cause. There are features common to all forms of LE. In recent years, antibody(ab)-defined subtypes have been established. They are distinct regarding underlying pathophysiologic processes, clinical and magnetic resonance imaging courses, cerebrospinal fluid signatures, treatment responsivity, and likelihood of a chronic course. With immunotherapy, LE with abs against surface antigens has a better outcome than LE with abs to intracellular antigens. Diagnostic and treatment challenges are, on the one hand, to avoid overlooking and undertreatment and, on the other hand, to avoid overdiagnoses and overtreatment. LE can be conceptualized as a model disease for the consequences of new onset mediotemporal damage by different mechanisms in adult life. It may be studied as an example of mediotemporal epileptogenesis.

Clinical Course and Features of Seizures Associated With LGI1-Antibody Encephalitis

OBJECTIVE

To determine risk factors associated with clinical relapses and development of chronic epilepsy in patients with anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) IgG encephalitis.

METHODS

Patients with seizures related to LGI1-antibody encephalitis with ≥ 24 months of follow-up from disease onset were identified in the Mayo Clinic electronic medical record and Neuroimmunology lab records. Charts were reviewed to determine clinical factors, seizure types, imaging, treatment, occurrence of relapse, and outcome. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of the development of chronic epilepsy. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the influence of baseline characteristics on relapse risk.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with LGI1-antibody encephalitis and acute symptomatic seizures were identified. Almost all patients (n=48, 98%) were treated with immunotherapy. Eight had definite, and two had possible chronic epilepsy at last follow-up (10/49, 20.4%). Female sex (P=0.048) and younger age at disease onset (P=0.02) were associated with development of chronic epilepsy. Relapses occurred in 20 (40.8%), with a median time to first relapse of 7.5 months (range 3-94 months). Initial treatment with chronic steroid sparing immunotherapy was associated with reduced risk of relapse (hazards ratio=0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.73, P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic epilepsy occurred in 20.4% of our patients with LGI1-antibody encephalitis despite aggressive immunotherapy. Risk factors for chronic epilepsy were female sex and earlier age of onset. Relapses occurred in 40.8% of patients with prolonged follow-up, and chronic steroid sparing immunotherapy was associated with a lower relapse rate.

Prevalence of Neural Autoantibodies in Epilepsy of Unknown Etiology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of neural autoantibodies in epilepsy of unknown etiology varies among studies. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled global prevalence and the prevalence for each antibody.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for studies that included prospectively patients ≥16 years old with epilepsy of unknown etiology and systematically determined neural autoantibodies. A meta-analysis was undertaken to estimate pooled prevalence in total patients with a positive result for at least one neural autoantibody in serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and for each autoantibody.

RESULTS

Ten of the eleven studies that met the inclusion criteria and a total of 1302 patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology were included in themeta-analysis. The global pooled prevalence (IC95%) was 7.6% (4.6-11.2) in a total of 82 patients with a positive result for any neural autoantibody. None of the controls available in the studies had a positive result. Individual pooled prevalence for each autoantibody was: glycine receptor (GlyR) (3.2%), glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) (1.9%), N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) (1.8%), leucine-rich glioma inactivated-1 protein (LGI1) (1.1%), contactin-2-associated protein (CASPR2) (0.6%) and onconeuronal (0.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The pooled prevalence of neural autoantibodies in patients with epilepsy of unknown etiology is small but not irrelevant. None of the controls had a positive result. There was high heterogeneity among studies. In the future, a homogeneous protocol for testing neural autoantibodies is recommended.

Inflammation, ictogenesis, and epileptogenesis: An exploration through human disease

Epilepsy is seen historically as a disease of aberrant neuronal signaling manifesting as seizures. With the discovery of numerous auto-antibodies and the subsequent growth in understanding of autoimmune encephalitis, there has been an increasing emphasis on the contribution of the innate and adaptive immune system to ictogenesis and epileptogenesis. Pathogenic antibodies, complement activation, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, and microglial activation are seen, to various degrees, in different seizure-associated neuroinflammatory and autoimmune conditions. These aberrant immune responses are thought to cause disruptions in neuronal signaling, generation of acute symptomatic seizures, and, in some cases, the development of long-term autoimmune epilepsy. Although early treatment with immunomodulatory therapies improves outcomes in autoimmune encephalitides and autoimmune epilepsies, patient identification and treatment selection are not always clear-cut. This review examines the role of the different components of the immune system in various forms of seizure disorders including autoimmune encephalitis, autoimmune epilepsy, Rasmussen encephalitis, febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). In particular, the pathophysiology and unique cytokine profiles seen in these disorders and their links with diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment decision-making are discussed.