Risk of multiple sclerosis relapses when switching from fingolimod to cell-depleting agents: the role of washout duration

Effect of Prior Treatment With Fingolimod on Early and Late Response to Rituximab/Ocrelizumab in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Real-life studies noted that the risk of disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) after switching to rituximab (RTX) or ocrelizumab (OCR) may be unequal depending on prior disease-modifying therapy (DMT), with a higher risk associated with fingolimod (FING).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of a structured prospective data collection including all consecutive patients with relapsing MS who were prescribed RTX/OCR in the MS center of Marseille. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to clinical and MRI outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 321 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up of 3.5 years (1.5-5) after RTX/OCR initiation. At the first RTX/OCR infusion, the mean (SD) age of patients was 37 (10) years, and the median (IQR) disease duration was 8 years (3-15): 68 patients did not receive treatment before RTX/OCR and 108 switched from FING, 47 from low efficacy therapy, and 98 from natalizumab. For statistical analysis, the group "FING" was divided into "short-FING" and "long-FING" groups according to the median value of the group's washout period (27 days). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, for only the "long-FING" group, the risk of relapse within the first 6 months of RTX/OCR was increased as compared with patients without previous DMT (hazard ratio [HR]: 8.78; 95% CI 1.72-44.86; p < 0.01). Previous DMT and washout period duration of FING had no effect on B-cell levels at 6 months. Beyond the first 6 months of RTX/OCR, age <40 years was associated with increased risk of relapse (HR: 3.93; 95% CI 1.30-11.89; p = 0.01), male sex with increased risk of new T2 lesions (HR: 2.26; 95% CI 1.08-4.74; p = 0.03), and EDSS ≥2 with increased risk of disability accumulation (HR: 3.01; 95% CI 1.34-6.74; p < 0.01). Previous DMT had no effect on the effectiveness of RTX/OCR beyond 6 months after initiation.

DISCUSSION

For patients switching from FING to RTX/OCR, the risk of disease reactivation within the first 6 months of treatment was increased as compared with patients with other DMT or no previous DMT only when the washout period exceeded 26 days. Neither FING nor other previous DMT reduced the effectiveness of RTX/OCR beyond the first 6 months of treatment.

Multiple faces of multiple sclerosis in the era of highly efficient treatment modalities: Lymphopenia and switching treatment options challenges daily practice

The expanded treatment landscape in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) has resulted in highly effective treatment options and complexity in managing disease- or drug-related events during disease progression. Proper decision-making requires thorough knowledge of the immunobiology of MS itself and an understanding of the main principles behind the mechanisms that lead to secondary autoimmunity affecting organs other than the central nervous system as well as opportunistic infections. The immune system is highly adapted to both environmental and disease-modifying agents. Immune reconstitution following cell depletion or cell entrapment therapies eliminates pathogenic aspects of the disease but can also lead to distorted immune responses with harmful effects. Atypical relapses occur with second-line treatments or after their discontinuation and require appropriate clinical decisions. Lymphopenia is a result of the mechanism of action of many drugs used to treat MS. However, persistent lymphopenia and cell-specific lymphopenia could result in disease exacerbation, secondary autoimmunity, or the emergence of opportunistic infections. Clinicians treating patients with MS should be aware of the multiple faces of MS under novel, efficient treatment modalities and understand the intricate brain-immune cell interactions in the context of an altered immune system. MS relapses and disease progression still occur despite the current treatment modalities and are mediated either by failure to control effector mechanisms inherent to MS pathophysiology or by new drug-related mechanisms. The multiple faces of MS due to the highly adapted immune system of patients impose the need for appropriate switching therapies that safeguard disease remission and further clinical improvement.

Effect of Previous Disease-Modifying Therapy on Treatment Effectiveness for Patients Treated With Ocrelizumab

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

B cell-depleting antibodies were proven as effective strategy for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). The monoclonal antibody ocrelizumab was approved in 2017 in the United States and in 2018 in the European Union, but despite proven efficacy in randomized, controlled clinical trials, its effectiveness in the real-world setting remains to be fully elucidated. In particular, most study patients were treatment naive or switched from injectable therapies, whereas oral substances or monoclonal antibodies made up >1% of previous treatments.

METHODS

We evaluated ocrelizumab-treated patients with RMS enrolled in the prospective cohorts at the University Hospitals Duesseldorf and Essen, Germany. Epidemiologic data at baseline were compared, and Cox proportional hazard models were applied to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty patients were included (median age: 37 years, 35% male patients). Compared with using ocrelizumab as a first-line treatment, its use as a third-line therapy increased hazard ratios (HRs) for relapse and disability progression, whereas differences between first- vs second-line and second- vs third-line remained smaller. We stratified patients according to their last previous disease-modifying treatment and here identified fingolimod (FTY) (45 patients, median age 40 years, 33% male patients) as a relevant risk factor for ongoing relapse activity despite 2nd-line (HR: 3.417 [1.007-11.600]) or 3rd-line (HR: 5.903 [2.489-13.999]) ocrelizumab treatment, disability worsening (2nd line: HR: 3.571 [1.013-12.589]; 3rd line: HR: 4.502 [1.728-11.729]), and occurrence of new/enlarging MRI lesions (2nd line: HR: 1.939 [0.604-6.228]; 3rd line: HR: 4.627 [1.982-10.802]). Effects were persistent throughout the whole follow-up. Neither peripheral B-cell repopulation nor immunoglobulin G levels were associated with rekindling disease activity.

DISCUSSION

Our prospectively collected observational data suggest suboptimal effectiveness of ocrelizumab in patients switching from FTY compared with those switching from other substances or having been treatment naive. These findings support previous studies indicating abated effectiveness of immune cell-depleting therapies following FTY treatment in patients with RMS.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with RMS, previous treatment with FTY compared with previous treatment with other immunomodulating therapies decreases the effectiveness of ocrelizumab.

Effectiveness and safety of switching from fingolimod and natalizumab to rituximab in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis

INTRODUCTION

Natalizumab and fingolimod are well-established, sequestrating disease-modifying treatments (DMTs), widely used as a second-line treatment in patients with relapse remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). However, there is no standard strategy for managing treatment failure on these agents. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rituximab after natalizumab and fingolimod withdrawal.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort was accomplished on RRMS patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod who were switched to rituximab.

RESULTS

100 patients (50 cases in each group) were analyzed. After six months of follow-up, a substantial decline in clinical relapse and disability progression was observed in both groups. However, no significant change was demonstrated in the pattern of MRI activity (P = 1.000) in natalizumab pretreated patients. After adjusting for the baseline characteristics, a head-to-head comparison found a non-significant trend of lower EDSS in the pretreated fingolimod group compared to those previously treated with natalizumab(P = 0.057). However, in terms of clinical relapse and MRI activity, the clinical outcomes were comparable in both groups ((P = 0.194), (P = 0.957). Moreover, rituximab was well-tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed the effectiveness of rituximab as an appropriate alternative option for escalation therapy after fingolimod and natalizumab discontinuation.

Neurological update: treatment escalation in multiple sclerosis patients refractory to fingolimod-potentials and risks of subsequent highly active agents

A critical issue in the management of relapsing MS (RMS) is the discontinuation of disease-modifying treatments (DMT) due to lack of efficacy, intolerability or impending risks. With new therapeutic agents introduced into the treatment of RMS, immediate- and long-term consequences of sequential drug use, as well as the effect of the sequence in which the drugs are given, are unclear but may affect efficacy, adverse events, and long-term immunocompetence. In the absence of clinical studies specifically addressing these concerns, observations from clinical practice are of particular value in guiding current management algorithms. Prompted by a study published by Ferraro et al. in this journal, we set out to provide an overview of the published real-world evidence on the effectiveness and safety of switching from fingolimod to another DMT in patients with active RMS. Seventeen publications reporting relevant information were identified. The literature suggests that immune cell depletion induced by alemtuzumab or ocrelizumab is associated with an increased risk of relapse and worsening disability in patients switching from fingolimod compared to patients switching from other therapeutic agents. However, the evidence reported for natalizumab and cladribine is inconclusive. While shortening of the washout period may limit early disease reactivation after fingolimod discontinuation, there is no strong evidence that the duration of the washout period or the absolute lymphocyte count at baseline are predictors of attenuated long-term efficacy. Further real-world studies are required to better understand outcomes among patients who are under-represented in controlled trials.