Opinion, knowledge, and clinical experience with functional neurological disorders among Italian neurologists: results from an online survey

Stigma in functional neurological disorder (FND) - A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate stigma and Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) regarding: 1) prevalence and associated factors, 2) the nature and context of stigma in FND, and 3) stigma-reduction interventions.

METHODS

We searched four relevant databases from inception to December 2023, using search terms relevant to FND and stigma themes. We employed the method of synthesis by "aggregation and configuration" to synthesise and analyse the data into emergent themes.

RESULTS

We found 127 studies, spanning 148 countries, involving 18,886 participants. Of these, 4889 were patients, 13,123 were healthcare professionals, and 526 were caregivers. Quantitatively, stigma has been mainly studied in patients with functional seizures, and was higher than patients with epilepsy in three studies. Stigma experienced by patients is associated with poorer quality of life and caregiver burden. We found 10 themes and 29 subthemes revealing stigma as a systemic process, with intrapersonal, interpersonal and structural aspects. Few studies examined the perspective of caregivers, the public or online community. We identified six anti-stigma interventions.

CONCLUSION

Stigma in FND is a layered process, and affects patient quality of life and provision of care. Stigma needs to be addressed from the top structures, at governmental level, so that appropriate care pathways can be created, giving patients with FND parity of esteem with other medical conditions.

Psychiatrists' attitudes towards functional neurological disorders: results from a national survey

Introduction

Functional neurological disorder (FND) presents motor, sensory, and cognitive symptoms characterized by clinical signs incongruent with known neurological disease. Together with other health professionals, like neurologists, psychiatrists can play an essential role in diagnosing and managing these disorders. Hence, understanding their opinion and clinical experience with FND is of utmost importance to catch potential educational needs and improve healthcare services for patients. This study aims at assessing the knowledge, opinion, and clinical approach of Italian psychiatrists to FND.

Methods

Members of the Italian Society of Psychiatry completed a 14-item web-based survey investigating their approach to FND. Results. Overall, 174 questionnaires were completed. Our main findings suggest that Italian psychiatrists have a psychogenetic conceptualization of FND. "Conversion disorders", in fact, is the term most frequently used by Italian psychiatrists to refer to FND, thus implying a psychological etiology of these disorders. Congruently with this view, psychotherapy associated with pharmacological therapy is considered the most appropriate treatment by psychiatrists, while physiotherapy is an under-recognized treatment option for FND.

Discussion

The present study highlights that a psychogenetic view of FND dominates among Italian psychiatrists. This could be due to out-of-date knowledge about the pathophysiology of this group of disorders. Promoting education about novel approaches to FND would be of crucial importance to improving care for patients suffering from this condition.

Economic Cost of Functional Neurologic Disorders: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Functional neurologic disorder (FND) represents genuine involuntary neurologic symptoms and signs including seizures, weakness, and sensory disturbance, which have characteristic clinical features, and represent a problem of voluntary control and perception despite normal basic structure of the nervous system. The historical view of FND as a diagnosis of exclusion can lead to unnecessary health care resource utilization and high direct and indirect economic costs. A systematic review was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to assess these economic costs and to assess for any cost-effective treatments.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluations Database of the University of York) for original, primary research publications between inception of the databases and April 8, 2022. A hand search of conference abstracts was also conducted. Key search terms included "functional neurologic disorder," "conversion disorder," and "functional seizures." Reviews, case reports, case series, and qualitative studies were excluded. We performed a descriptive and qualitative thematic analysis of the resulting studies.

RESULTS

The search resulted in a total of 3,244 studies. Sixteen studies were included after screening and exclusion of duplicates. These included the following: cost-of-illness (COI) studies that were conducted alongside cohort studies without intervention and those that included a comparator group, for example, another neurologic disorder (n = 4); COI studies that were conducted alongside cohort studies without intervention and those that did not include a comparator group (n = 4); economic evaluations of interventions that were either pre-post cohort studies (n = 6) or randomized controlled trials (n = 2). Of these, 5 studies assessed active interventions, and 3 studies assessed costs before and after a definitive diagnosis of FND. Studies showed an excess annual cost associated with FND (range $4,964-$86,722 2021 US dollars), which consisted of both direct and large indirect costs. Studies showed promise that interventions, including provision of a definitive diagnosis, could reduce this cost (range 9%-90.7%). No cost-effective treatments were identified. Study comparison was limited by study design and location heterogeneity.

DISCUSSION

FND is associated with a significant use of health care resources, resulting in economic costs to both the patient and the taxpayer and intangible losses. Interventions, including accurate diagnosis, seem to offer an avenue toward reducing these costs.

[Functional neurological disorders and forensic medicine: Clinical and practical characteristics]

Functional neurological disorders (FND) have long been a challenge for medicine, both on clinical and psychodynamic point of view. The medico-legal issue is often relegated to the background in medicine, and FND patients also suffer from such neglected topic. Nonetheless, despite the difficulty to properly diagnose FND and the numerous associated organic and/or psychiatric comorbidities, FND patients report a significant level of deficiency and a high alteration of quality of life when compared to other well-recognized chronic disorders such as Parkinson's disease or epilepsy. Whether it is for the estimation of a personal injury, a prejudice, after-effects following a medical accident or certain legal contexts requiring the elimination of a factitious disorder or a simulation, the uncertainty and imprecision in the medico-legal assessment can imply notable consequences on the patient. In this article, we propose to define the different medico-legal contexts in which FND can occur that of the legal expert, that of the consulting physician, that of the so-called recourse physician and finally that of the attending physician who can provide detailed medical files to the patient in order to help him/her in his/her procedures. We then explain how to use standardized objective evaluation tools validated by the learned societies and how to encourage multidisciplinary cross-evaluation. Finally, we specify how to differentiate FND from historically FND-associated disorders (factitious and simulated disorders), through the clinical criteria, considering the difficulties linked to the uncertainty in the clinical examination of these disorders in a medico-legal context. In addition to the rigorous completion of expertise missions, we aim to reduce two damaging consequences characterizing FND: diagnostic delay and the patients' suffering through stigma.

Neurofilament light chain: a promising diagnostic biomarker for functional motor disorders

OBJECTIVE

Functional motor disorders (FMDs) are disabling neurological conditions characterized by abnormal movements which are inconsistent and incongruent with recognized neurological diseases. Aim of this study is to investigate whether FMDs are related to structural axonal damage.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with a definite diagnosis of FMD with no other neurological/psychiatric comorbidities (pure FMDs) and age-matched healthy controls (HCs) were recruited in a tertiary center and demographic/clinical data were collected. Serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) assessment was performed with ultrasensitive paramagnetic bead-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

34 patients with FMDs and 34 HCs were included. NfL levels were similar (p = 0.135) in FMDs (median 8.3 pg/mL, range 2-33.7) and HCs (median 6.1 pg/mL, range 2.7-15.6). The area under curve (0.606, 95% CI 0.468-0.743) confirmed that NfL concentration was not different in the two groups. NfL values were similar in patients with paroxysmal vs persistent disease course (p = 0.301), and isolated vs combined symptoms (p = 0.537). NfL levels were associated with age (p < 0.0001), but not with disease duration (p = 0.425), number of CNS acting drugs (p = 0.850), or clinical features (p = 0.983).

DISCUSSION

Our preliminary data show that NfL levels are similar in patients with FMDs and HCs, indicating the lack of neuroaxonal damage. These results have relevant pathogenic and clinical implications and suggest that serum NfL may be a promising diagnostic biomarker, potentially useful to differentiate functional vs structural neurological disorders.

Clinicians' implicit and explicit attitudes about the legitimacy of functional neurological disorders correlate with referral decisions

OBJECTIVES

Uncertainty regarding the legitimacy of functional neurological disorder (FND) remains among some health care professionals. Despite treatment guidelines and consensus recommendations, variability in clinical practice referral decisions persists. Evidence from other conditions suggests such clinical decision making is impacted by practitioners' implicit and explicit attitudes. We aimed to identify whether health care professionals hold implicit and/or explicit attitudes about the legitimacy of FND and whether these attitudes are associated with referral decision making.

DESIGN/METHODS

We included 66 health care professionals who work with people with neurological conditions: n = 37 medical doctors, mainly neurologists (n = 18) and psychiatrists (n = 10), and n = 29 doctoral level practitioner psychologists. Participants completed an Implicit Association Test (IAT), Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP), a referral decision-making vignette task and self-report measures of explicit attitudes on FND-legitimacy, therapeutic optimism and clinician confidence. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) was used as a comparator condition.

RESULTS

Participants self-reported strong explicit FND-legitimate and MS-legitimate attitudes but demonstrated an implicit FND-illegitimate/MS-legitimate bias. Deeper examination provided by the IRAP data indicated pro-FND-legitimate attitudes, but no bias for or against FND-illegitimate-contrasting the pro-MS-legitimate, anti-MS-illegitimate attitudes for the comparator condition. Attitudes about FND-illegitimacy were negatively associated with likelihood of referral to physical interventions such as physiotherapy. Medical doctors had lower treatment optimism and stronger explicit attitudes that FND is illegitimate than psychologists.

CONCLUSIONS

At an implicit level, clinicians are uncertain about the illegitimacy of FND, and such attitudes are associated with lower likelihood of referral to physiotherapy in particular. Improved education on FND among health care professionals is indicated.

Do demographic and clinical features and comorbidities affect the risk of spread to an additional body site in functional motor disorders?

The aim of this study is to assess changes in the body distribution and the semeiology of functional motor disorder (FMD) in patients who reported only one or more than one body site affected at FMD onset. Data were obtained from the Italian Registry of Functional Motor Disorders, which included patients with a diagnosis of clinically definite FMDs. The relationship between FMD features and spread to other body sites was estimated by multivariate Cox regression analysis. We identified 201 (49%) patients who reported only one body site affected at FMD onset and 209 (51%) who reported multiple body sites affected at onset. FMD spread from the initial site to another site in 43/201 (21.4%) patients over 5.7 ± 7.1 years in those with only one site affected at FMD onset; FMD spread to an another body site in 29/209 (13.8%) over 5.5 ± 6.5 years. The spread of FMD was associated with non-motor functional symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities only in the patients with one body site affected at FMD onset. Our findings provide novel insight into the natural history of FMD. The number of body sites affected at onset does not seem to have a consistent influence on the risk of spread. Furthermore, our findings suggest that psychiatric comorbidities and non-motor functional symptoms may predict the spread of FMD symptoms, at least in patients with one body site affected at onset.

Updates in Functional Movement Disorders: from Pathophysiology to Treatment Advances

Purpose of Review

This review discusses advances in functional movement disorders (FMD) over the past 3 years, with a focus on risk factors, diagnosis, pathophysiology, neuroimaging studies, and treatment.

Recent Findings

The past decade has brought a revived interest in functional movement disorders, with a growing number of studies exploring pathophysiological mechanisms. Here, we review recent studies demonstrating changes in attention, emotional and sensorimotor function in FMD. Through international collaborative efforts, progress has been made in defining biomarkers and outcome measures, an important prerequisite towards standardization of diagnosis and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials. Of particular interest are neuroimaging studies demonstrating functional and structural changes in motor and emotional brain circuits, deepening our understanding of FMD as a neurocircuit disorder and potentially paving the way towards new treatments. Currently available treatment modalities have shown successful outcomes via outpatient, inpatient, and virtual delivery.

Summary

The last 3 years have seen tremendous efforts to better understand, diagnose, and treat FMD. The disease model has been broadened to include a biopsychosocial formulation, and insights on the pathophysiology on FMD are informing treatment efforts. Several international multidisciplinary research collaborations are underway to define biomarkers and best outcome measures, highlighting the path towards improved standardization of future treatment trials. Additionally, the rise of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic has reduced geographic barriers and paved the way for virtual therapy sessions and self-guided programs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11910-022-01192-9.