Predictors and reasons for epilepsy patients to decline surgery: a prospective study

Super-selective injection of propofol into the intracranial arteries enables Patient's self-evaluation of expected neurological deficit

INTRODUCTION

It is hard to realize the extent of the expected postoperative neurological deficit for patients themselves. The provision of appropriate information can contribute not only to examining surgical indications but also to filling the gap between patient and expert expectations. We hypothesized that propofol infusion into the intracranial arteries (ssWada) could induce focal neurological symptoms with preserved wakefulness, enabling the patients to evaluate the postsurgical risk subjectively.

METHODS

Presurgical evaluation using ssWada was performed in 28 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Based on anatomical knowledge, propofol was super-selectively infused into the intracranial arteries including the M1, M2, and M3 segments of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), A2 segment of the anterior cerebral artery, and P2 segment of the posterior cerebral artery to evaluate the neurological and cognitive symptoms. We retrospectively analyzed a total of 107 infusion trials, including their target vessels, and elicited symptoms of motor weakness, sensory disturbance, language, unilateral hemispatial neglect (UHN), and hemianopsia. We evaluated preserved wakefulness which enabled subjective evaluations of the symptoms and comparison of the subjective experience to the objective findings, besides adverse effects during the procedure.

RESULTS

Preserved wakefulness was found in 97.2% of all trials. Changes in neurological symptoms were positively evaluated for motor weakness in 51.4%, sensory disturbance in 5.6%, language in 48.6%, UHN in 22.4%, and hemianopsia in 32.7%. Six trials elicited seizures. Multivariate analysis showed significant correlations between symptom and infusion site of language and left side, language and MCA branches, motor weakness and A2 or M2 superior division, and hemianopsia and P2. Transient adverse effect was observed in 8 cases with 12 infusion trials (11.2 %).

CONCLUSION

The ssWada could elicit focal neurological symptoms with preserved wakefulness. The methodology enables specific evaluation of risk for cortical resection and subjective evaluation of the expected outcome by the patients.

Fear of disease in patients with epilepsy - a network analysis

Background

Disease-related fear among patients with epilepsy has significantly impacted their quality of life. The Disease-Related Fear Scale (D-RFS), comprising three dimensions, serves as a relatively well-established tool for assessing fear in these patients. However, certain problems potentially exist within the D-RFS's attribution of items, and its internal structure is still unclear. To establish an appropriate dimensional structure and gain deeper comprehension of its internal structure-particularly its core variables-is vital for developing more effective interventions aimed at alleviating disease-related fear among patients with epilepsy.

Methods

This study employed a cross-sectional survey involving 609 patients with epilepsy. All participants underwent assessment using the Chinese version of the D-RFS. We used exploratory network analysis to discover a new structure and network analysis to investigate the interrelationships among fear symptom domains. In addition to the regularized partial correlation network, we also estimated the node and bridge centrality index to identify the importance of each item within the network. Finally, it was applied to analyze the differences in network analysis outcomes among epilepsy patients with different seizure frequencies.

Results

The research findings indicate that nodes within the network of disease-related fear symptoms are interconnected, and there are no isolated nodes. Nodes within groups 3 and 4 present the strongest centrality. Additionally, a tight interconnection exists among fear symptoms within each group. Moreover, the frequency of epileptic episodes does not significantly impact the network structure.

Conclusion

In this study, a new 5-dimension structure was constructed for D-RFS, and the fear of disease in patients with epilepsy has been conceptualized through a network perspective. The goal is to identify potential targets for relevant interventions and gain insights for future research.

Patient, parent and carer perspectives surrounding expedited paediatric epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

Most paediatric epilepsies with MRI visible lesions do not respond to antiseizure pharmacotherapy. Such medication resistance, which often takes years to become formally defined, is commonly required for surgical candidacy. Expedited surgical referral at lesional epilepsy diagnosis may result in better seizure, cognitive and developmental prognoses. This study explored the views of patients, parents and carers regarding epilepsy surgery, treatment priorities, and participation in a proposed expedited surgery trial.

METHODS

205 patients, parents and carers (61% UK-based, 26% North American) responded to electronic surveys from February to May 2022. Participants were recruited through social media sites, epilepsy charities and societies. Categorical choice and free-text questions were used to investigate participant perspectives, and Pearson's chi-squared test was utilised to detect meaningful differences amongst respondent subgroups.

RESULTS

Almost 90% of respondents who had experienced epilepsy surgery (either themselves or their child) reported seizure cessation or reduction. Postoperative outcome measures prioritised most frequently were seizure freedom (66%), quality of life (47%), seizure severity (30%), seizure frequency (28%) and independence (27%). Most participants support expedited surgery in suitable patients (65%), with just over half (51%) willing to participate in the proposed trial. Many participants (37%) were undecided, often due to fears surrounding neurosurgery. Subgroup perspectives were broadly similar, with more parents and caregivers favouring expedited surgery compared to patients (p = .016) and more UK-based participants willing to take part in an expedited surgery trial compared to those from North America (p = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients, parents and carers are open to considering expedited surgery for lesional epilepsies and would support a trial exploring this approach. Priorities from treatment were largely similar between participant subgroups, with seizure, quality of life and neuropsychological outcomes ranked highly. Accounting for these preferences will facilitate the delivery of a trial that is patient- and caregiver-focused, enhancing feasibility, satisfaction and benefit for prospective participants.

Trends in the Utilization of Surgical Modalities for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Comprehensive 10-Year Analysis Using the National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Epilepsy is considered one of the most prevalent and severe chronic neurological disorders worldwide. Our study aims to analyze the national trends in different treatment modalities for individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy and investigate the outcomes associated with these procedural trends in the United States.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2020, patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), open surgical resection, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) were identified. Trend analysis was performed using piecewise joinpoint regression. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes between 10 years prepandemic before 2020 and the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

This study analyzed a total of 33 969 patients with a diagnosis of drug-resistant epilepsy, with 3343 patients receiving surgical resection (78%), VNS (8.21%), RNS (8%), and LITT (6%). Between 2010 and 2020, there was an increase in the use of invasive electroencephalography monitoring for seizure zone localization (P = .003). There was an increase in the use of LITT and RNS (P < .001), while the use of surgical resection and VNS decreased over time (P < .001). Most of these patients (89%) were treated during the pre-COVID pandemic era (2010-2019), while a minority (11%) underwent treatment during the COVID pandemic (2020). After propensity score matching, the rate of pulmonary complications, postprocedural hematoma formation, and mortality were slightly higher during the pandemic compared with the prepandemic period (P = .045, P = .033, and P = .026, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study indicates a relative decrease in the use of surgical resections, as a treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. By contrast, newer, minimally invasive surgical approaches including LITT and RNS showed gradual increases in usage.