DMEK in phakic eyes: targeted therapy or highway to cataract surgery?

Analysis of Graft Detachments and Re-Bubblings After 450 Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Procedures

PURPOSE

To objectify the indication for re-bubbling by analyzing graft detachments (GDs) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric observational study, re-bubbling cases of 450 Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasties and the percentage of the residual gas filling (RGF) in the anterior chamber on the first postoperative day were collected. The number/location/extent of GDs and the corneal thickness above GDs were analyzed using anterior segment optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

From a total of 450 grafts, 384 (85.3%) had at least a minimal degree GD. One hundred twenty-two of 450 grafts (27.1%) underwent at least 1 re-bubbling. The mean RGF was significantly lower in eyes with GD (67.7 ± 12.6%) than in eyes without GD (74.2 ± 11.3%). GDs occurred most frequently in the inferotemporal quadrant (46.0%). GDs were significantly more likely to require a re-bubbling when the central parts of the graft were affected (94.0% vs. 35.7%). The number of detachments per graft was directly proportional to the re-bubbling rate. The GDs which required a re-bubbling were on average 56 μm higher and 461 μm wider than the untreated ones. The cornea above the GDs that needed a re-bubbling was significantly thicker than above the untreated GDs (mean 988 ± 102 μm vs. 951 ± 99 μm).

CONCLUSIONS

The RGF seems to be a major influencing factor for graft attachment. The most susceptible location of the GD is inferotemporal. The main factors that need to be investigated to decide if a re-bubbling is required are the number of detachments per graft, their dimensions, whether the central portions of the graft are involved, and the corneal thickness above GDs.

Comparison of Pre- and Post-DMEK Keratometry and Total Keratometry Values for IOL Power Calculations in Eyes Undergoing Triple DMEK

PURPOSE

To evaluate prediction accuracy of pre- and post-DMEK keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) values for IOL power calculations in Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) eyes undergoing DMEK with cataract surgery (triple DMEK).

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study of 55 FECD eyes (44 patients) that underwent triple DMEK between 2019 and 2022 between two centers in USA and Europe. Swept-source optical coherence tomography biometry (IOLMaster 700) was used for pre- and post-DMEK measurements. K and TK values were used for power calculations with ten formulae (Barrett Universal II (BUII), Castrop, Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hoffer Q, Hoffer QST, Holladay I, Kane, and SRK/T). Mean error, mean absolute error (MAE), standard deviation, and percentage of eyes within ±0.50/±1.00 diopters (D) were calculated. Studied formulae were additionally adjusted using a method published previously (IOLup1D Method), which increases the IOL power by 1D. While both eyes from the same patient were considered for descriptive statistics, we restricted to one eye per individual (44 eyes for statistical comparisons.

RESULTS

MAEs for all formulae were lower for post-DMEK K and TK than pre-DMEK K and TK by an average of 0.24 and 0.47 D, respectively. The lowest MAE was 0.49 D for Kane using post-DMEK TK, and the highest MAE was 1.05 D for BUII using pre-DMEK TK. Most IOLup1D formulae had lower MAEs than pre-DMEK K and TK formulae.

CONCLUSIONS

The IOLup1D Method should be used instead of pre-DMEK K and TK values for triple DMEK in FECD eyes. Using post-DMEK TK values for cataract surgery after DMEK provides better refractive accuracy than any of the three studied methods used for triple DMEK procedures.

Hitting the refractive target in corneal endothelial transplantation triple procedures: A systematic review

In phakic patients Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are frequently combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (triple procedure). This surgery might cause a refractive shift difficult to predict. Early DMEK and DSAEK results have shown a tendency toward a hyperopic shift. Myopic postoperative refraction is typically intended to correct this postoperative refractive defect and to bring all eyes as close to emmetropia as possible. We sought to understand the mechanism underlying the hyperopization and to identify predictive factors for poorer refractive outcomes, the most suitable target refraction and IOL calculation methods in patients undergoing combined cataract extraction and lamellar endothelial corneal transplantation (DSAEK or DMEK) for endothelial dysfunctions. Of the 407 articles analyzed, only 18 were included in the analysis. A myopic target between -0.50 D and -0.75 was the most common (up to -1.50 for DSAEK triple procedures), even though no optimum target was found. Hyperopic surprises appeared more frequently in corneas that were flatter in the center than in the periphery (oblate posterior profile). Among the numerous IOL calculation formulas, there was no apparent preference.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A National Registry-Based Comparison

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome between posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking preoperative patient characteristics in consideration. Surgical methods compared were Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and DSAEK with concomitant cataract surgery (phacoemulsification plus DSAEK).

DESIGN

Registry-based study with propensity score matching.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand six hundred seventy-seven patients from all Swedish corneal transplantation units treated from 2012 through 2019.

METHODS

All patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty performed from 2012 through 2019 with completed 2-year follow-up data reported to The Swedish Corneal Transplant Register were included, totaling 1677 patients. Three comparable groups (DMEK, DSAEK, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK) with 216 patients in each group were generated with propensity score matching based on preoperative visual acuity, age, sex, year of surgery, and preoperative risk factors such as inflammation, vascularization, and glaucoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-year follow-up, frequency of graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and graft failure within 2 years including primary graft failure.

RESULTS

The preoperative corneal status was affected more severely in the DSAEK group before matching. In the matched groups, the median BCVA 2 years after surgery was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in both the DMEK and the phacoemulsification plus DSAEK groups and 0.15 logMAR in the DSAEK group (P = 0.001). The frequency of graft dislocation was higher among the patients undergoing phacoemulsification plus DSAEK, but the frequency of graft failure and primary graft failure was higher in the DMEK group.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity improved in most patients (90%) with all 3 surgical methods. However, DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK reached higher levels of visual acuity 2 years after surgery, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK was superior considering graft survival rate. All 3 surgical procedures showed both strengths and weaknesses, suggesting that the choice of surgical method should be individualized, taking into consideration not only the cornea, but each patient's complete medical status as well as the entire course of postoperative medical care.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Refractive outcomes after DMEK: meta-analysis

In this meta-analysis and systematic literature review of refractive outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), the extent of the refractive shift and an overview of reasons for refractive shift after DMEK are provided. The PubMed library was screened for articles containing the terms "Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty," "DMEK," "Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery," "triple-DMEK" combined with "refractive outcomes," "refractive shift," and "hyperopic shift." The refractive outcomes after DMEK were analyzed and compared using a fixed and random effects model. The overall mean change of the spherical equivalent outcome when compared with the preoperative value in cases of DMEK or when compared with the preoperative target refraction in cases of DMEK combined with cataract surgery was +0.43 diopters (D) (95% CI, 0.31-0.55). When DMEK is combined with cataract surgery, a target refraction of -0.5 D is recommended to achieve emmetropia. Changes in the posterior corneal curvature are identified as the main cause of the refractive hyperopic shift.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachments in superior versus temporal approach

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) graft detachment rate comparing superior versus temporal main incision approach.

METHODS

Retrospective comparative study on patients who underwent DMEK surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy or bullous keratopathy with main wound incision performed at either 90° in the superior approach, or at 180°/0° in the temporal approach. All main incisions were secured with a single 10-0 nylon suture at the end of surgery. Data collected were donor age and gender, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and gender, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, re-bubbling rate, air fill in the anterior chamber (AC) at day one and intra- and early postoperative complications.

RESULTS

187 eyes were included in the study. 99 eyes had DMEK surgery with superior approach, while 88 eyes had temporal approach. The two groups had no differences in donor age and sex, endothelial cell counts, graft diameter, recipient age and sex, indication for transplant, surgeon grade, and air fill in the anterior chamber at day one. Re-bubbling rate was 38.4% for surgeries performed with superior access and 29.5% for those with temporal access(p = 0.186). After exclusion of patients with intraoperative and/or postoperative complication, the difference in re-bubbling rate was higher, although non-significant (37.5% and 25% for superior and temporal approach respectively, p = 0.098).

CONCLUSION

The temporal approach in DMEK showed a trend towards a clinically significant lower rate of post-operative re-bubbling compared to the superior approach, however, no statistically significant difference was noted comparing the two approaches, which both remain feasible options in DMEK surgery.

Fuchs Dystrophy and Cataract: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment

Corneal endothelium plays an important role in maintaining hydration homeostasis and clarity of the cornea. Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) affects the corneal endothelium resulting in edema and characteristic excrescences on the Descemet's membrane known as corneal guttae. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has evolved to become the standard of care for patients with FECD with excellent visual acuity outcomes. Patients with FECD may have coexisting cataracts and therefore may require a cataract surgery, which increases the risk of corneal decompensation. The presence of FECD may not only influence the choice of intraocular lens but vision outcomes can also be affected by the corneal condition. The ability to combine the surgeries further raises important considerations regarding the timing and sequence of DMEK and cataract extraction for patients with FECD. This review provides a guide for corneal surgeons in choosing between endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery-alone, in combination or sequential-in their management of patients with FECD.

Posterior stromal ripples increase risk of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft detachment worsening over time

PURPOSE

To evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) features of Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) grafts associated with graft attachment worsening over time.

METHODS

Retrospective case series on patients who received uncomplicated DMEK surgery and for whom subsequent AS-OCT data were available for analysis. Patients' demographics and surgical details were collected. AS-OCT was analysed for graft detachment axial extension, presence of posterior stromal ripples, quadrant involvement (location and number), degree of detachment extension, peripheral roll, presence and amount of air in the anterior chamber (AC). Features associated with re-bubbling and graft detachment worsening over time were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients with a mean age of 70.8 ± 9.8 years (63% females) were included. AS-OCT was performed at 2.9 ± 2.4 days after surgery. AS-OCT factors associated with re-bubbling were posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.004) and detachment axial extension (p < 0.001). At first follow-up, of the 147 DMEK, 67 showed complete attachment and 80 partial detachment. In those cases of initially completely attached grafts, posterior stromal ripples were associated with the risk of subsequent graft detachment (p = 0.014) together with recipient age (p = 0.043), phaco-combined surgery (p = 0.018) and AS-OCT timing (p = 0.033); while, in the initially partially detached grafts, detachment worsening was associated with posterior stromal ripples (p = 0.025), detachment axial extension (p = 0.003), degrees of detachment involvement (p = 0.029), peripheral roll-in shape (p = 0.033) and presence of air in the AC (p = 0.032). Relative risk (RR) of graft detachment worsening in patients with moderate/severe posterior stromal ripples was 1.75 (95% CI = 1.09-2.81).

CONCLUSION

Posterior stromal ripples and detachment axial extension >1/3 of graft surface area were the main risk factors for detachment worsening over time, and patients showing these features should be monitored closely to identify the need for re-bubbling at an early stage, thus improving surgical outcomes.

“Endothelium-Out” and “Endothelium-In” Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Graft Insertion Techniques: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Background

We evaluated the visual outcomes and complications of “endothelium-out” and “endothelium-in” Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft insertion techniques.

Materials and Methods

Electronic searches were conducted in CENTRAL, Cochrane databases, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov. Study designs included clinical trials, comparative observational studies, and large case series (≥25 eyes). PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and synthesis. Random-effects models were employed for meta-analyses.

Results

21,323 eyes (95 studies) were included. Eighty-six studies reported on “endothelium-out” techniques; eight studies reported on “endothelium-in” techniques. One study compared “endothelium-out” to “endothelium-in” techniques. Eighteen “endothelium-out” studies reported that 42.5–85% of eyes achieved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 58.7% (95% CI 49.4–67.7%,15 studies). Three “endothelium-in” studies reported that 44.7–87.5% of eyes achieved BCVA of ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 62.4% (95% CI 33.9–86.9%). Pooled mean endothelial cell loss was lower in the “endothelium-in” studies (28.1 ± 1.3%, 7 studies) compared to “endothelium-out” studies (36.3 ± 6.9%,10 studies) at 6 months (p = 0.018). Graft re-bubbling rates were higher in the “endothelium-out” studies (26.2%, 95% CI 21.9–30.9%, 74 studies) compared to “endothelium-in” studies (16.5%, 95% CI 8.5–26.4%, 6 studies), although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.440). Primary graft failure rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.552). Quality of evidence was considered low and significant heterogeneity existed amongst the studies.

Conclusion

Reported rates of endothelial cell loss were lower in “endothelium-in” DMEK studies at 6 months compared to “endothelium-out” studies. Outcomes of “endothelium-in” techniques were otherwise comparable to those reported in “endothelium-out” studies. Given the technical challenges encountered in “endothelium-out” procedures, surgeons may consider “endothelium-in” techniques designed for easier intra-operative DMEK graft unfolding. “Endothelium-in” studies evaluating outcomes at longer time points are required before conclusive comparisons between the two techniques can be drawn.

Comparison of triple-DMEK to pseudophakic-DMEK: A cohort study of 95 eyes

Previous comparative studies show that triple Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) (i.e. phacoemulsification followed immediately by DMEK) has either equivalent or better visual outcomes than DMEK in pseudophakic patients. To resolve this discrepancy, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. All consecutive patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy who underwent triple or pseudophakic DMEK in 2015–2019 in a tertiary-care hospital (France) and were followed for >12 months were compared in terms of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), final refractive outcomes, and endothelial-cell loss at 12 months as well as rebubbling rates. The triple-DMEK (40 eyes, 34 patients) and pseudophakic-DMEK (55 eyes, 43 patients) groups were similar in terms of age and other baseline variables. They also did not differ in final BSCVA (both 0.03 logMAR), final endothelial-cell loss (54% vs. 48%), or astigmatism (-1.25 vs. -1 D). At 12 months, triple-DMEK associated with significantly smaller residual hyperopia (0.75 vs. 1 D; p = 0.04) and spherical equivalence (0 vs. 0.5 D; p = 0.02). Triple-DMEK also tended to associate with more frequent rebubbling (40% vs. 24%, p = 0.09). In conclusion, while triple-DMEK and pseudophakic-DMEK achieved similar visual acuity improvement, triple-DMEK was superior in terms of final sphere and spherical refraction but also tended to have higher complication rates.

Effects of Combined Cataract Surgery on Outcomes of Descemet's Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature-to-date regarding the effects of combined cataract surgery on outcomes of DMEK.

Methods

Multiple electronic databases were searched, including Cochrane Library databases, PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The final search was updated on 10th February 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized studies and large case series (≥25 eyes) of DMEK (pseudophakic/phakic) and “triple DMEK”. A total of 36 studies were included in this study. Meta-analyses were done with risk differences (RD) computed for dichotomous data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data via random-effects model. Primary outcome measure: postoperative re-bubbling rate; secondary outcome measures: complete/partial graft detachment rate, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell loss (ECL), primary graft failure, and cystoid macular edema (CMO).

Results

A total of 11,401 eyes were included in this review. Based on non-randomized studies, triple DMEK demonstrated a better BCVA at 1-month postoperative than DMEK alone (MD 0.10 logMAR; 95% CI: 0.07–0.13; p < 0.001), though not statistically significant at 3–6 months postoperative (MD 0.07 logMAR; 95% CI: −0.01 to 0.15; p = 0.08). There was no significant difference in rebubbling, ECL, graft failures, and CMO postoperatively between the two groups (p = 0.07, p = 0.40, 0.06, and 0.54 respectively).

Conclusion

Our review suggests that DMEK has a similar post-operative complication risk compared to “triple DMEK” (low-quality evidence), with comparable visual outcome and graft survival rate at 6 months postoperative. High-quality RCTs specifically studying the outcomes of combined vs. staged DMEK are still warranted.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020173760, identifier: CRD42020173760.

RESULTS OF POSTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTIES IN PHAKIC EYES

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results of posterior lamellar keratoplasties (DMEK and PDEK) in phakic eyes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of surgeries performed in our department between June 2016 and December 2019. The main focus was put on postoperative visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell density and possible peroperative and postoperative complications including cataract formation.

RESULTS

We performed 12 surgeries on 11 eyes of 7 patients. The most prevalent primary diagnosis was Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (7 eyes), followed by bullous keratopathy after phakic anterior chamber IOL implantation (2 eyes) and ICE syndrome (2 eyes). The average length of follow-up was 12.5 months. Clinically significant complicated cataract had developed and was removed in 3 eyes, one eye required rebubbling due to graft detachment and one eye required rePDEK due to graft failure. At the end of follow-up, the average visual acuity was 0.87, while 82% of eyes achieved VA 0.8 or better, and the average endothelial cell density was 1589 cells/mm2.

CONCLUSION

Posterior lamellar keratoplasties (DMEK and PDEK) can be performed on phakic eyes. When performed by an experienced surgeon, these are safe procedures with good postoperative results and significant advantage in preserving younger patients accommodation.

Outcomes of Pseudophakic, Phakic, and Triple DMEK

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of phakic and pseudophakic eyes treated by Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus DMEK combined with cataract surgery (triple DMEK).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study based on the prospective Cologne DMEK data base. This study is a single-center analysis of 62 eyes undergoing phakic (age mean ± SD 52 ± 6.43), 518 eyes undergoing pseudophakic (73.5 ± 8.57), and 557 eyes undergoing triple DMEK (67.93 ± 8.57). Outcome measures were changes in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density (ECD), rebubbling rates within the first year after surgery, and the need for cataract surgery within the first 2 years after phakic DMEK.

RESULTS

The preoperative BSCVA (mean ± SD; logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution) was 0.30 ± 0.22 in the phakic, 0.63 ± 0.45 in the pseudophakic, and 0.44 ± 0.30 in the triple DMEK group (P < 0.001), which changed to 0.09 ± 0.12, 0.14 ± 0.1, and 0.1 ± 0.1 (P < 0.001) 1 year after surgery, respectively. There was no difference in central corneal thickness (P = 0.929) and endothelial cell density (P = 0.606) 1 year postoperatively. Rebubbling rates in DMEK using SF6 20% for anterior chamber tamponade were not significantly different (P = 0.839). After phakic DMEK, 40% of eyes underwent cataract surgery within the second year. However, there was a high loss to follow-up in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Phakic and triple DMEK procedures tend to have a better 1-year BSCVA than pseudophakic DMEK, with no differences in all other parameters analyzed. However, patients from the pseudophakic DMEK group were older and already had worse BSCVA before surgery.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty and Bowman Layer Transplantation: An Anatomic Review and Historical Survey

For nearly a century, the definitive treatment of many corneal dystrophies and ectactic disorders was limited to penetrating keratoplasty, but over the past 2 decades, a surge of surgical innovation has propelled the treatment of many corneal diseases to more targeted approaches with significantly better visual outcomes. Anterior stromal diseases were first changed through endothelial-sparing techniques, such as deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, but have more recently transitioned to stromal-sparing approaches. Ultraviolet corneal crosslinking strengthens the cornea and halts progression of keratoconus in >90% of cases. Intracorneal ring segment and corneal allogenic ring segment implantation offer methods to flatten ectatic corneas. However, Bowman layer transplantation - inlay and more recently onlay techniques - has shown promise for treating advanced keratoconus and preventing keratoplasty. The advent of endothelial keratoplasty radically changed the treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty specifically offers an average postoperative visual acuity of 20/25 (0.8) with only 8.8% of grafts requiring retransplantation in the first 5 years. Here, we review the rapid innovations for surgical treatment of corneal diseases, spanning from endothelial keratoplasty and endothelial regeneration to anterior lamellar keratoplasty and stromal augmentation, highlighting key steps which may be moving us closer to a "postkeratoplasty" world.

Graft detachments in endothelial keratoplasty

Graft detachment is the most common complication of endothelial keratoplasty. With the ongoing advancements in the field of endothelial keratoplasty, our understanding of risk factors of graft detachments and its management has been evolving. Various prevention measures have been described in literature including presoaking the donor graft, anterior chamber tamponade, venting incisions, sutures to prevent dislocation of graft. Management of a detached graft involves secondary interventions such as rebubbling, suturing and regrafts. In this review, we discuss graft detachment in different types of endothelial keratoplasty techniques including Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty; with emphasis on incidence, risk factors, preventive measures and their management.

Long-term Results of a Combined Procedure of Cataract Surgery and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty With Stromal Rim

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term results of combining cataract surgery, intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty with peripheral stromal support (DMEK-S).

METHODS

The outcomes of 107 eyes of 37 patients who had undergone a combination of cataract surgery, IOL implantation, and DMEK-S between October 2007 and February 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. The average follow-up duration was 18.2 ± 18.3 months (range, 6-84 months). Changes in uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and corneal endothelial cell density were analyzed. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.92 ± 0.60 preoperatively to 0.33 ± 0.33, 0.28 ± 0.25, 0.24 ± 0.20, and 0.27 ± 0.27 at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively (P < 0.001), respectively. The mean logMAR corrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.62 ± 0.65 preoperatively to 0.17 ± 0.29, 0.13 ± 0.21, 0.07 ± 0.16, and 0.11 ± 0.23 at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively (P < 0.001), respectively. The mean endothelial cell density decreases were 50.7% ± 21.1%, 50.8% ± 19.8%, 60.7% ± 16.6%, 62.2% ± 11.8%, and 61.8% ± 20.0% at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after surgery, respectively. Similar trends, although with slightly better visual outcomes, were found in the subgroup of patients without other eye diseases. The mean final deviation from intended spherical equivalent was 0.77 ± 1.19 D, representing a hyperopic shift.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined procedure of cataract surgery, IOL implantation, and DMEK-S is an effective method of treatment in patients with combined corneal disease and cataract, maintaining visual rehabilitation in the long term. Future developments should be performed to minimize the incidence of complications.

Effect of Surgical Indication and Preoperative Lens Status on Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes

PURPOSE

To analyze 6-month results of 1000 consecutive Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) cases, and to evaluate if outcomes are influenced by surgical indication and preoperative lens status.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

A series of 1000 eyes (738 patients) underwent DMEK mainly for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD; 85.3%) or bullous keratopathy (BK; 10.5%). Main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density, postoperative complications, and retransplantations.

RESULTS

At 6 months after DMEK, there was no difference in BCVA outcome between FECD and BK eyes (P = .170), or between phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (P = .066) after correcting for patient age and preoperative BCVA. Endothelial cell loss at 6 months postoperatively was similar for phakic and pseudophakic FECD eyes (39%; P = .852), but higher for BK eyes than for FECD eyes (46% vs 39%, P = .001). Primary and secondary graft failure occurred in 3 (0.3%) and 2 eyes (0.2%), respectively, and 7 eyes developed allograft rejection (0.7%). Eighty-two eyes (8.2%) received rebubbling for graft detachment and retransplantation was performed in 20 eyes (2.0%). Rebubbling was more often required in eyes treated for BK vs FECD eyes (12.4% vs 7.4%, P = .022).

CONCLUSION

DMEK consistently provides excellent short-term results, with similar high visual acuity levels for both FECD and BK eyes. As preoperative lens status did not influence DMEK outcomes, for phakic FECD eyes with a still relatively clear crystalline lens, lens preservation may be preferable in a selected group of younger patients, who may still benefit from their residual accommodative capacity.

Using the posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio to minimize the risk of a postoperative hyperopic shift after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate different corneal parameters in identifying patients at risk of a hyperopic shift after (DMEK).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 92 eyes of patients with FECD after DMEK surgery. Pachymetry parameters, various tomographic parameters and densitometry values before and after DMEK were determined using a rotating Scheimpflug system (Pentacam HR, Oculus). For assessing the posterior to anterior corneal curvature relationship, we calculated the R_PA (posterior to anterior corneal curvature radii ratio).

RESULTS

The average keratometry reading of the posterior corneal surface (Km^B) increased and the total corneal refractive power (TCRP) decreased significantly after surgery (P < .001). There was a significant difference between the preoperative and postoperative R_PA (P < .001) and the posterior Q value (P < .001). The strongest correlation was found between the change in the Km^B and the preoperative R_PA (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.872, P < .001). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the highest AUC values (for ∆Km^B) among the different preoperative parameters tested were obtained for R_PA and posterior Q value (Asph. Q^B) with AUROC (area under the ROC) values of 0.95 and 0.89, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Q value and the R_PA showed the highest correlation with the change in corneal refractive power and the greatest AUC. These parameters could be used as surrogate markers to identify eyes that might be at risk of a greater postoperative hyperopic shift, which would allow more accurate setting of refractive goals.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the published literature on the safety and outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the surgical treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction.

METHODS

Literature searches were last conducted in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases most recently in May 2017. The searches, which were limited to English-language abstracts, yielded 1085 articles. The panel reviewed the abstracts, and 47 were determined to be relevant to this assessment.

RESULTS

After DMEK surgery, the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 20/21 to 20/31, with follow-up ranging from 5.7 to 68 months. At 6 months, 37.6% to 85% of eyes achieved BCVA of 20/25 or better and 17% to 67% achieved BCVA of 20/20 or better. Mean endothelial cell (EC) loss was 33% (range, 25%-47%) at 6 months. Overall change in spherical equivalent was +0.43 diopters (D; range, -1.17 to +1.2 D), with minimal induced astigmatism of +0.03 D (range, -0.03 to +1.11 D). The most common complication was partial graft detachment requiring air injection (mean, 28.8%; range, 0.2%-76%). Intraocular pressure elevation was the second most common complication (range, 0%-22%) after DMEK, followed by primary graft failure (mean, 1.7%; range, 0%-12.5%), secondary graft failure (mean, 2.2%; range, 0%-6.3%), and immune rejection (mean, 1.9%; range, 0%-5.9%). Overall graft survival rates after DMEK ranged from 92% to 100% at last follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) ranged from 20/34 to 20/66 at 9 months. The most common complications after DSEK were graft detachment (mean, 14%; range, 0%-82%), endothelial rejection (mean, 10%; range, 0%-45%), and primary graft failure (mean, 5%; range, 0%-29%). Mean EC loss after DSEK was 37% at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence reviewed supports DMEK as a safe and effective treatment for endothelial failure. With respect to visual recovery time, visual outcomes, and rejection rates, DMEK seems to be superior to DSEK and to induce less refractive error with similar surgical risks and EC loss compared with DSEK. The rate of air injection and repeat keratoplasty were similar in DMEK and DSEK after the learning curve for DMEK.

Intraocular lens power calculation using standard formulas and ray tracing after DMEK in patients with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy

BACKGROUND

The study presented here aims to optimize the accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations in patients after DMEK by evaluation of the impact of the altered anterior/posterior corneal curvature relationship.

METHODS

Scheimpflug-based Oculus Pentacam imaging was performed after DMEK surgery for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. The IOL power was calculated for all patients by ray tracing, aiming for postoperative emmetropia. We also performed the IOL calculation using four third-generation formulas (SRK-T, Hoffer-Q, Holladay-1 and Haigis). The residual refractions for the individual target IOL were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

This retrospective study included 42 eyes of 33 patients (age 68.73 ± 10.11 years) after DMEK surgery. The differences between the expected residual refraction based on ray tracing and that predicted with the third-generation formulas were statistically significant (all formulas p < 0.001). The highest mean difference in the residual refraction between the target IOL measured by ray tracing and that calculated with third-generation formulas was found for the Haigis formula (0.90 ± 0.40 D), and the lowest mean difference for the SRK/T formula (0.73 ± 0.49 D).

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK surgery induced a relevant change in the anterior to posterior corneal curvature relationship; this needs to be taken into account in the IOL power calculation to avoid hyperopic refractive surprises.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and refractive surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) has become a first-line treatment in corneal endothelial diseases because of its exceptional clinical outcomes and low complication rates. Because of its improved refractive predictability, DMEK is now also considered for managing cases with endothelial decompensation following previous refractive procedures, or in combination with those. This article reviews the clinical outcomes in these cases and discusses the possibility of refractive interventions following DMEK.

RECENT FINDINGS

DMEK has been successfully performed in eyes after laser in-situ keratomileusis, eyes after anterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation and aphakic eyes. Often, DMEK is combined with cataract surgery (triple-DMEK). Initial reports on reducing the refractive cylinder by toric IOL implantation are available. Although there are some reports on phacoemulsification and IOL implantation after phakic DMEK, reports on laser refractive procedures following DMEK are lacking.

SUMMARY

In contrast to earlier keratoplasty techniques, DMEK induces on average only mild refractive shifts owing to the 'natural' restoration of the cornea. As such, DMEK may be ideal in managing corneal decompensation in refractive patients. However, further studies are required to assess the safety and efficacy of DMEK after refractive treatment and of refractive procedures following DMEK.

[Triple Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Indications, variations and results]

When Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is indicated in patients with phakic eyes, a combination with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation in one sitting should be considered as a triple DMEK. The best possible preoperative deswelling of the cornea should be strived for in order to allow sufficient viewing conditions for the individual stages of cataract surgery. Furthermore, technical details, e.g. regulation of pupillary width also must be considered. The power of the intraocular lens has to be adjusted in order to compensate for the shift of refraction towards hyperopic values induced by DMEK surgery. A rapid and clear improvement in visual acuity can normally be achieved after a triple DMEK. There seem to be no disadvantages compared with a two-stage procedure for DMEK and cataract surgery.