Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty via a frown incision

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) via a sclerocorneal frown incision.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative study.

METHODS

The outcomes of Descement stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) were retrospectively compared between 36 patients (36 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 3.8-mm frown incision (frown incision group) and 20 patients (20 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 4.6-mm straight incision (straight incision group). In all patients, an NS Endo-Inserter was used as the graft inserter and the incision for a frown incision was via the superior sclerocorneal site and for the straight incision via the temporal cornea. DSAEK was performed by the standard technique, except for the incision. At 1 year after surgery, the two groups were compared with respect to the visual acuity, decrease of corneal endothelial cell density, the severity of corneal astigmatism (diopters), the number of sutures for wound closure, and intraoperative/postoperative complications.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and intraoperative/postoperative complications one year after surgery. On the other hand, the number of sutures required for wound closure was 1.13 ± 0.42 in the frown incision group, whereas in the straight incision group, it was 3.20 ± 0.40, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). In addition, there was no decreased corneal endothelial cell density associated with the reduction in incision width.

CONCLUSIONS

A sclerocorneal frown incision is useful for performing DSAEK with an NS Endo-Inserter as it does not affect endothelial cell loss despite its short incision width.

Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A National Registry-Based Comparison

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome between posterior lamellar corneal transplant procedures for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, taking preoperative patient characteristics in consideration. Surgical methods compared were Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and DSAEK with concomitant cataract surgery (phacoemulsification plus DSAEK).

DESIGN

Registry-based study with propensity score matching.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand six hundred seventy-seven patients from all Swedish corneal transplantation units treated from 2012 through 2019.

METHODS

All patients undergoing endothelial keratoplasty performed from 2012 through 2019 with completed 2-year follow-up data reported to The Swedish Corneal Transplant Register were included, totaling 1677 patients. Three comparable groups (DMEK, DSAEK, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK) with 216 patients in each group were generated with propensity score matching based on preoperative visual acuity, age, sex, year of surgery, and preoperative risk factors such as inflammation, vascularization, and glaucoma.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the 2-year follow-up, frequency of graft dislocation, graft rejection episodes, and graft failure within 2 years including primary graft failure.

RESULTS

The preoperative corneal status was affected more severely in the DSAEK group before matching. In the matched groups, the median BCVA 2 years after surgery was 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in both the DMEK and the phacoemulsification plus DSAEK groups and 0.15 logMAR in the DSAEK group (P = 0.001). The frequency of graft dislocation was higher among the patients undergoing phacoemulsification plus DSAEK, but the frequency of graft failure and primary graft failure was higher in the DMEK group.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity improved in most patients (90%) with all 3 surgical methods. However, DMEK and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK reached higher levels of visual acuity 2 years after surgery, and phacoemulsification plus DSAEK was superior considering graft survival rate. All 3 surgical procedures showed both strengths and weaknesses, suggesting that the choice of surgical method should be individualized, taking into consideration not only the cornea, but each patient's complete medical status as well as the entire course of postoperative medical care.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Corneal transplantation: A walk to vision

Corneal diseases are a major cause of blindness in the world. Corneal transplantation has been a cornerstone in the management of several of these advanced pathologies. This article discusses the evolution of corneal transplantation over a century, its indications, complications and briefly the various surgical techniques. Such tremendous technical improvisations from total corneal transplantation to lamellar keratoplasties have generated significant interest in the ophthalmic world and garnered momentum to the fight against blindness. Armed Forces Medical Services are also in vogue more than ever in this forward surge.

Incidence and management of early postoperative complications in lamellar corneal transplantation

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of the incidence, risk factors, and management of early complications after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty (DSAEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

A literature review of complications, that can occur from the time of the transplant up to 1 month after the transplant procedure, was conducted. Case reports and case series were included in the review.

RESULTS

Complications in the earliest postoperative days following anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty have shown to affect graft survival. These complications include, but are not limited to, double anterior chamber, sclerokeratitis endothelial graft detachment, acute glaucoma, fluid misdirection syndrome, donor-transmitted and recurrent infection, and Uretts-Zavalia syndrome.

CONCLUSION

It is essential for surgeons and clinicians to not only be aware of these complications but also know how to manage them to minimize their impact on long-term transplant survival and visual outcomes.

Cost Drivers of Endothelial Keratoplasty: A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis

PURPOSE

To determine cost drivers of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) through evaluation of surgical costs and procedure length based on type of EK, use of preloaded grafts, and performance of simultaneous cataract surgery.

DESIGN

This study was an economic analysis of EKs at a single academic institution using time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) methodology.

PARTICIPANTS

Endothelial keratoplasty surgical cases, including Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center from 2016 to 2018 were included in the analysis.

METHODS

Data and inputs were obtained via the electronic health record (EHR) and from prior literature. Simultaneous cataract surgeries were included and separately categorized for analysis. Endothelial keratoplasty expenses were determined with TDABC, a method for cost calculation that incorporates the time that key resources are used and each resource's associated cost rate.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome measures included surgery length (in minutes) and day-of-surgery costs.

RESULTS

There were 559 EKs included: 355 DMEKs and 204 DSAEKs. Fewer DSAEKs had simultaneous cataract extraction (47; 23%) than DMEK (169; 48%). Of the DMEKs, 196 (55%) used preloaded corneal grafts. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cost $392.31 less (95% confidence interval, $251.05-$533.57; P < 0.0001) than DSAEK and required 16.94 fewer minutes (14.16-19.73; P < 0.0001). Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty cases that used preloaded corneal grafts cost $460.19 less ($316.23-$604.14; P < 0.0001) and were 14.16 minutes shorter (11.39-16.93; P < 0.0001). In multivariate regression, preloaded graft use saved $457.19, DMEK (compared with DSAEK) saved $349.97, and simultaneous cataract surgery added $855.17 in day-of-surgery costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost analysis of TDABC identified a day-of-surgery cost and surgical time reduction associated with the use of preloaded grafts for DMEK, DMEK compared with DSAEK, and isolated EK compared with EK combined with cataract surgery. This study provides an improved understanding of surgical cost drivers and margin incentivization, which may explain trends and indirectly influence patient care decisions in cornea surgery practices.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Using a Preloaded Imported Graft

PURPOSE

Although the popularity of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is increased, there is still few clinical studies in Korea. In this study, we aimed to report the initial clinical outcomes of DMEK in patients followed up for more than 6 months.

METHODS

A total of 96 eyes that underwent DMEK by a single surgeon for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, pseudophakic bullous keratopathy, or other indications were evaluated for best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), postoperative complications, and graft survival.

RESULTS

The postoperative BCVA significantly increased compared to the preoperative BCVA by 59.4% (1.00 ± 0.77 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution vs. 0.67 ± 0.76 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, p < 0.001). The average preoperative ECD was 754 ± 382 cells/mm2, increasing to 1,333 ± 562 cells/mm2 at 3 months (76.8%, p < 0.001), 1,334 ± 632 cells/mm2 at 6 months (76.9%, p < 0.001), 1,121 ± 474 cells/mm2 at 12 months (48.7%, p = 0.024), and 972 ± 458 cells/mm2 at 24 months postoperatively (28.9%, p = 0.445). Compared to 3 months, the ECD declined by 15.9% at 12 months (p = 0.009) and 27.1% at 24 months postoperatively (p = 0.158). The average CCT was 675 ± 113 μm preoperatively, decreasing to 581 ± 102, 574 ± 101, and 594 ± 94 μm at 6, 12, and 24 months after DMEK, respectively (p < 0.001 between all follow-up time points). Allograft rejection was detected in three (3.1%) and 14 eyes (14.6%) underwent retransplantation at an average of 10.1 ± 8.4 months after DMEK.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK is promising for maintaining corneal clarity, low postoperative complication rates, and stable graft longevity.

Comparison of penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty in patients with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: A registry study

BACKGROUND

To compare graft survival of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome and identify ocular features associated with graft survival.

METHODS

Observational, prospective, cohort study. A total of 30 806 first grafts performed between 1985 and 2020 were identified through the Australian Corneal Graft Registry and included in this observational, prospective cohort study. A total of 196 eyes underwent a primary corneal graft for ICE syndrome. Kaplan-Meier graft survival plots and Chi-squared tests were performed to identify graft survival rates for EK and PK. A history of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) was also recorded and analysed. Graft survival of eyes with ICE syndrome were compared to that of other indications.

RESULTS

Grafts performed for ICE syndrome increased to 0.8% of all cases during the 2005 to 2020 period compared with 0.5% between 1985 to 2004 (χ2 =9.35, p = 0.002). From 2010, EK surpassed PK as the preferred graft type. Survival of primary grafts in eyes with ICE syndrome was lower than for other indications (log-rank = 56.62, p < 0.001). Graft survival was higher following PK than Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DS(A)EK) (log-rank = 10.56, p = 0.001). Graft survival was higher in eyes without a history of raised IOP compared to those with a reported history of raised IOP (log-rank = 13.06, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ICE syndrome carries a poor prognosis for graft survival. DS(A)EK had a poorer prognosis than PK. A history of raised IOP is associated with higher risk of graft failure.

Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)

This study, a case series of 2 patients and a literature review, aims to describe the second and third known cases of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. The suprachoroidal hemorrhage is defined as the presence of blood in the suprachoroidal space; final visual acuity is rarely greater than 0.1 (decimal scale). Both cases presented had known risk factors: high myopia, previous ocular surgeries, arterial hypertension, and being under anticoagulant therapy. The diagnosis of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage was made at the 24-hour follow-up visit, as they recalled a sudden and tremendous acute pain hours after surgery. Both cases were drained through a scleral approach. Delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage is a rare but devastating consequence that can occur after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Awareness of the most critical risk factors allows for early identification, which is of paramount importance for the prognosis of these patients.

Effects of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty on Corneal Densitometry of Cases with Long-Standing Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy

Purpose

To quantify the effects of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) on corneal clarity and densitometry of patients with long-standing pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) complicated with subepithelial fibrosis.

Methods

Thirty-four eyes with PBK complicated with corneal edema for more than 6 months and subepithelial fibrosis were enrolled. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmic examination and corneal densitometry module of Pentacam HR, before and 1, 3, and 6 months after DSAEK.

Results

Thirteen patients were excluded due to postoperative complications or missed to follow-up visits. Finally, twenty-one patients' data were analyzed. Corneal densitometry measures significantly decreased in all three layers (anterior, central, and posterior) 3 and 6 months after surgery compared to preoperative values; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance in the 1st month. Moreover, densitometry measurements were significantly lower at month 6 compared to month 1, but not at month 3 compared to month 1. Corneal densitometry of the anterior layer was significantly higher than central and posterior layers in 2 mm and 6 mm zones preoperatively and at all postoperative visits. Corneal light backscatter of each three layers was not statistically different between 0-2 mm and 2-6 mm in all pre- and postoperative visits.

Conclusions

Corneal densitometry in cases of PBK begins to improve after DSAEK in different layers in a slow and continued trend which takes up to 6 months for an effect to be seen. Interestingly, this improvement is possible even in complicated corneas with long-standing edema. Hence, corneal densitometry can be used as an objective method for quantification of the outcome of DSAEK in complicated cases of PBK.

Clinical Outcomes of the Intraocular Lens Injector and Busin Glide for Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with Iridocorneal Endothelial Syndrome

Purpose: To report the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) performed in iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome patients using the intraocular lens injector (injector), in comparison with those using the Busin glide. Methods: In this retrospective, interventional comparative study, we evaluated the outcomes of DSAEK performed using the injector (n = 12) or the Busin glide (n = 12) for patients with ICE syndrome. Their graft position and postoperative complications were recorded. Their best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and endothelial cell loss (ECL) were monitored over a 12-month follow-up period. Results: DSAEK was conducted successfully in the 24 cases. The BCVA improved from the preoperative 0.99 ± 0.61 to 0.36 ± 0.35 at 12 months after operation (p < 0.001), with no significant difference between the two groups (the injector group and the Busin group) (p = 0.933). ECL at 1 month after DSAEK was 21.80 ± 15.01% in the injector group, which was significantly lower than 33.69 ± 9.75% of the Busin group (p = 0.031). No surgery-related complications were observed in the 24 cases intraoperatively or postoperatively except that one case suffered from postoperative graft dislocation, without statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusions: At 1 month after surgery, the use of graft injector for delivering DSAEK-based endothelial graft may cause significantly less endothelial cell damage than the pull-through technique used in the application of Busin glide. The injector allows safe endothelial graft delivery without the need of anterior chamber irrigation, which increases the ratio of successful graft attachment.

Case Report: Primary graft failure due to a reversed lenticule in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Introduction and importance: This report details the clinical features and management in a case of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) which had primary graft failure (PGF) due to an inverted yet attached lenticule. Presentation of case: A 66-year-old gentleman had poor visual recovery in the right eye after undergoing cataract surgery 12 years prior to presentation. The visual acuity was counting fingers and examination revealed endothelial decompensation. The patient underwent a DSAEK and postoperatively had a well attached lenticule. However, the cornea was edematous three weeks after the surgery and optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed a reversed lenticule. The patient underwent a repeat DSAEK and had an uneventful postoperative course. The visual acuity was 20/40 after 7 months with a clear cornea and a well attached graft. Discussion: PGF is a rare complication following DSAEK which occurs due to poor endothelial function of the donor graft. Insertion of a reversed lenticule may get overlooked as a cause of PGF unless the graft edge profile is examined on an OCT scan. The graft in the current case was well attached despite its inverted position suggesting that graft adherence is perhaps not a function of the corneal endothelial pumps in isolation and may be driven by factors such as the intraocular pressure. Conclusion: A reversed DSAEK lenticule may have normal adherence to the host stroma and must be considered in cases with PGF. OCT of the graft edge is required for diagnosis before performing a repeat keratoplasty.

Modified "Top-up sandwich" technique for the management of corneal perforations: A case report and a literature review

Purpose

We describe a modified technique for managing a peripheral, non-infected, corneal perforation using a "Sandwich" technique that combines posterior lamellar keratoplasty, an amniotic membrane patch and a Gundersen conjunctival flap.

Observations

A 75-year-old female patient presented with Sjogren's syndrome-related corneal perforation. A mini-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) graft (5 mm) was introduced into the anterior chamber and was mobilized to plug the perforation. Then, two amniotic membrane patches were stacked over the perforation and glued. Finally, the whole area was covered with a Gundersen conjunctival flap, mobilized from the inferior conjunctiva and secured in place using interrupted 10-0 nylon sutures. A step-by-step guide is also described. At three months, the final visual acuity was 6/9. A literature review revealed ten cases in which a posterior lamellar graft was effectively employed to treat corneal perforations.

Conclusions and Importance

We described a modified approach for treating peripheral corneal perforation surgically. This "sandwich" approach is simple to replicate and can give quick healing with few visual repercussions. Our detailed guide may be utilized to obtain similar results and may be added to the array of treatment options for peripheral corneal perforation.

A review of techniques and outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty in congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy

Congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy affects the Descemet membrane and endothelium, resulting in corneal decompensation. Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) has been the gold-standard surgical management until recently; however, at present, endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK/n-DSEK: Descemet-stripping or non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and DMEK/n-DMEK: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty) is being preferred due to lesser intraoperative and postoperative complications, early visual recovery, and comparable visual outcomes. Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) can be challenging, especially in pediatric eyes with CHED due to smaller eyeballs, shallow anterior chambers, phakic status, and poor intraoperative visibility due to thick and hazy corneas. A total of 198 articles matched our search strategy. After screening for duplication and going through the titles and abstracts, 12 relevant original articles, one case series, and six case reports were included in this review. Various surgical modifications have to be adopted in comparison to adult eyes to overcome the aforementioned difficulties. Regardless, studies have shown favorable visual outcomes with better graft survival and fewer complications in eyes that underwent EK compared to PKP. Hence, timely surgical intervention and strict amblyopia management can result in better final visual outcomes. The purpose of this review is to summarize various intraoperative difficulties and the surgical modifications required, different surgical techniques, visual and graft-related outcomes, and various complications of EK in CHED eyes.

Influence of time to procurement, incubation and release of organ cultured donor corneas on graft failure after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the time from death to procurement, to preservation or the storage time of donor corneas preserved in organ culture influenced the clinical outcome of patients undergoing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for Fuchs endothelial keratoplasty.

METHODS

We conducted a registry-based study on 776 patients undergoing DSAEK. Data on time from donor death to cornea retrieval (DRT), time from death to preservation (DPT), the preservation time and donor cornea characteristics: age, sex and endothelial cell density (ECD) at the time of release for surgery, were extracted from The Danish Cornea Bank Registry. Data on recipient follow-up were collected from a corneal graft registry. The primary outcome was presence of graft failure within a period from 2 months to 2 years after surgery. Secondary outcomes were DRT, DPT, ECD ≤2300 and gender mismatch between donor and recipient.

RESULTS

Graft failure occurred in 26 patients. The mean preservation time for failed grafts was 34.1 ± 10.0 days (mean ± SD) and 27.3 ± 10.6 days (mean ± SD) for the clear, functional grafts at the 2-year follow-up. A preservation time of >29 days compared with ≤29 days was associated with a lower survival (HR 2.33, 95% CI on 1.06-5.14, p = 0.036) and an increased risk of graft failure (RR 1.53, 95% CI on 1.11-2.10, p = 0.009). For the secondary outcome variables, no difference in the risk of graft failure was observed and did not appear to impact the survival rate of DSAEK patients.

CONCLUSION

Preservation time of donor cornea was associated with graft survival and a prolonged preservation time of more than 4 weeks seemed to lower the 2-year survival.

Corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty, penetrating keratoplasty, and phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To evaluate corneal biomechanical changes after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), penetrating keratoplasty (PK), and phacoemulsification (PE).

METHODS

This prospective study included 138 eyes which underwent PK (26 eyes), DSAEK (26 eyes), PE (57 eyes), and 29 normal eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and central corneal thickness (CCT) and axial length by ultrasound. The ocular response analyzer was used to measure corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-related IOP (IOPg), and cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc) preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At baseline, PK group had the lowest CH and CRF. There was a significant increase in CH and CRF to normal values in PK (P = 0.015 and 0.006) and PE (P = 0.005 and 0.0001) groups over the study period. At 6 months, CH and CRF increased and reached normal values in the PK group; increased to a lower level than normal in the DSAEK group; and, after an initial reduction, increased to normal values in the PE group. At 6 months, DSAEK group had the lowest CH and CRF. There was a significant positive correlation between CRF and GAT (r = 0.281, P = 0.009), IOPg and GAT (r = 0.335, P = 0.001), and IOPcc and GAT (r = 0.282, P = 0.001). CH was negatively correlated with age (r = - 0.189, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Corneal biomechanical factors increase after DSAEK and PK. At post-operative month six, they reach normal values in PK group, but are lower than normal in DSAEK group.

Comparison of Glaucoma Therapy Escalation After Penetrating Keratoplasty to Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for the Treatment of Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy: A Cohort Study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare glaucoma therapy escalation (GTE), graft survival, vision, and glaucoma following penetrating keratoplasty (PK group) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK group) to treat pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK).

METHODS

This cohort included cases of PBK managed with PK from 2009 to 2014. We compared the incidences and determinants of GTE, graft survival, and visual disability. P < 0.05 was statistically significant.

RESULTS

There were 58 eyes in the PK group and 117 eyes in the DSAEK group. The incidence of GTE in the PK and DSAEK groups at the last follow-up was 34.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.5-48.9) and 46.6% (95% CI: 27.7-65.4), respectively. The risk of GTE was similar between the groups (relative risk [RR] = 1.36 [95% CI: 0.94-1.98], P = 0.12). GTE was significantly associated with graft survival in the PK group (RR = 3.25 [95% CI: 1.5-7.0], P < 0.001) and the DSAEK group (RR = 3.77 [95% CI: 2.6-5.6], P < 0.001). Glaucoma (P = 0.001) and previous keratoplasty (P < 0.001) were significant predictors for GTE. At the final follow-up visit, severe visual disability was not significantly different between the groups (RR = 0.9 [95% CI: 0.3-2.9], P = 0.88). There was a statistically significant improvement in vision after DSAEK (P < 0.001) but not after PK (P = 0.67).

CONCLUSION

GTE was similar in eyes with PBK managed by PK or DSAEK. Glaucoma and previous keratoplasty were predictors of GTE post-keratoplasty. DSAEK gave better visual outcomes than PK for managing PBK.

Diagnosis of cytomegalovirus corneal endotheliitis using surgically removed Descemet's membrane and endothelium despite negative results with aqueous humor PCR: a case report

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) has been known to cause unilateral corneal endotheliitis with keratic precipitates and localized corneal edema, iridocyclitis, and secondary glaucoma. CMV endotheliitis is diagnosed based on clinical manifestations and viral examination using qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the aqueous humor.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 80-year-old woman was referred to our department for bullous keratopathy. Pigmented keratic precipitates were found in the right eye without significant anterior chamber inflammation. After 8 months there was inflammation relapse with mutton fat keratic precipitates and PCR on aqueous humor was performed, with negative results for CMV, herpes simplex virus, and varicella zoster virus. Keratic precipitates disappeared with steroid instillation, and Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) was performed for the right eye. CMV-DNA was positive at 6.0 × 10² copies/ GAPDH 10⁵ copies in real time PCR of corneal endothelial specimen removed during DSAEK with negative results for all the other human herpes viruses. After diagnosis of CMV corneal endotheliitis, treatment with systemic and topical ganciclovir was initiated and there was resolution of symptoms. No recurrence of iridocyclitis or corneal endotheliitis was observed at 6 months follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report suggests that PCR should be performed using the endothelium removed during DSAEK for bullous keratopathy of an unknown cause, even if PCR for aqueous humor yields negative results.

Iridotrabecular and Iridocorneal Contact Changes after Cataract Surgery and Endothelial Keratoplasty in Bilateral Iridoschisis

We report a case of bilateral iridoschisis with corneal oedema and a quantitative evaluation of the changes in iridotrabecular and iridocorneal contact before and after cataract surgery and after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). A 76-year-old woman with iridoschisis and cataracts, previously managed with laser iridotomy, experienced progressive vision loss. The preoperative iridotrabecular contact (ITC) index measured by anterior segment optical coherence tomography was 23.6% in the right eye and 24.4% in the left eye. Preoperative corneal oedema in the right eye was more severe than that in the left eye. Cataract surgery, followed by DSAEK, was performed in the right eye and subsequently in the left eye. Her visual acuity improved postoperatively, and the corneal oedema of both eyes was treated successfully. Moreover, the ITC index improved in both eyes, to 4.7 and 6.9% after cataract surgery and to 0 and 0% after DSAEK in the right and left eyes, respectively. Staged cataract surgery and DSAEK were effective for endothelial decompensation caused by iridoschisis. Additionally, we confirm that iridotrabecular and iridocorneal contacts improved after both surgical procedures not only after cataract surgery but also after DSAEK. This case report showed the clinical usefulness of the ITC index in the detection of changes after different surgical procedures.

Long-term outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy after argon laser iridotomy

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for bullous keratopathy secondary to argon laser iridotomy (BK-ALI).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Forty-five eyes from 41 consecutive patients with BK-ALI who underwent DSAEK from July 2007 to December 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and any complications were investigated over a 10-year postoperative period.

RESULTS

The mean BCVA improved from 0.80 logMAR before DSAEK to 0.28 logMAR at 6 months after DSAEK; the mean values showed an additional slight improvement between 6 months and 10 years after the surgery (P < .01). The mean ECD decreased from 2864 cells/mm² at baseline to 2269 cells/mm² (20.8% loss) at 6 months post-DSAEK, and this decreasing trend continued throughout the 10 years after DSAEK (P < .01). The mean ECD was 1148 cells/mm² (59.9% loss) after 5 years, and 568 cells/mm² (80.2% loss) after 10 years. No graft deaths were observed throughout the 10-year period (5-year follow-up rate 60.0%, 10-year follow-up rate 20.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-year outcomes of DSAEK for BK-ALI were excellent with a high graft survival rate.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Complicated Vitrectomized Eyes

PURPOSE

Vitrectomized eyes pose a technical challenge when performing endothelial keratoplasty (EK). The aim of the study was to compare outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in complex eyes undergoing pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) prior to or during surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive eyes that underwent pars plana infusion-assisted DMEK or pull-through DSAEK which underwent PPV prior to or during the EK at a tertiary center. Included were eyes with at least 1-year follow-up. The main outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifty-two eyes (n = 52) with a mean follow-up time of 24.6 ± 7.4 months were included. Both groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics although the DMEK group had a significantly larger proportion of Fuchs' patients (p = .009). There was no significant difference in postoperative logMAR BCVA between groups at each visit (p > .05 for all). There was a significantly higher proportion of overall serious adverse events (50.0% versus 15.4%, p = .02), retinal detachments (19.2% versus 0.0%, p = .05) and cystoid macular edema (23.1% versus 0.0%, p = .02) following DMEK. Graft detachment occurred more often following DMEK (53.9% versus 11.5%, p = .001) with no significant difference in rebubbling rates (23.1% versus 11.5%, p = .27).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant and similar improvement in BCVA was achieved following DMEK and DSAEK in complex vitrectomized eyes. Patients should be advised regarding the higher rates of potential serious complications associated with a pars plana infusion DMEK in this situation.

Surface quality and endothelial cell viability after femtosecond laser-assisted donor lenticule preparation for endothelial keratoplasty - An in-vitro study

Purpose

To compare surface quality and endothelial cell viability of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) donor lenticules prepared with femtosecond laser (FSL) or microkeratome (MK).

Methods

Experimental ex-vivo evaluation of 15 DSAEK donor lenticules prepared from optical quality donor corneas using 200 KHz FSL (9 eyes) or MK (6 eyes). Surface quality and smoothness of the cut were assessed using atomic force microscopy and endothelial cell viability was assessed using transmission electron microscopy.

Results

Mean lenticule thickness was 121.89 ± 17.13 μm in FSL group and 112.67 ± 5.89 μm in MK group (P = 0.33). Average roughness of stromal surface (RMSavg) [FSL- 30.51 ± 4.55 nm, MK-22.37 ± 1.83 nm; P = 0.02] and root mean square roughness (RMSrough) [FSL-31.39 ± 5.75 nm, MK-23.08 ± 0.40 nm; P = 0.012] was significantly more in FSL group. Increased granular and linear irregularities were observed in the FSL group. Endothelial cell disruption was more in FSL group (FSL- 29.49 ± 6.91% MK-13.28 ± 3.62%; P < 0.001) with decreased mean nucleus length (FSL-5.56 ± 0.17 μm, MK-7.52 ± 0.65 μm; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Automated MKs are still the standard of care for donor lenticule preparation and MK-assisted donor lenticules have smoother surface with less endothelial cell disruption than FSL. Further research is mandatory before FSL platforms can be considered a viable alternative to the MK.

Update on the Surgical Management of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the most common posterior corneal dystrophy and the leading indication for corneal transplantation in the United States. FECD is slowly progressive, and patients develop gradual corneal endothelial decompensation, eventually resulting in failure of the endothelium to maintain corneal deturgescence. Medical management consists of topical hyperosmotic agents to facilitate dehydration of the cornea, but surgical intervention is often required to regain corneal clarity. The surgical management of FECD has evolved over the past two decades as corneal transplantation techniques have allowed for more selective keratoplasty and replacement of only the diseased layers of the cornea. Prior surgical management consisted of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) that carried significant intraoperative risks associated with "open sky" as well as postoperative risks of graft rejection, wound dehiscence, postoperative astigmatism, and prolonged visual rehabilitation. In the past 15 years, endothelial keratoplasty (EK) has become the treatment of choice for endothelial disease, significantly reducing the risks associated with the surgical treatment of FECD. Here we discuss the current surgical management of FECD, including the introduction of Descemet stripping only (DSO), and highlight future investigative efforts.

Graft survival and endothelial outcomes after penetrating keratoplasty and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of graft survival, endothelial cell loss and vision improvement between penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for treating corneal endothelium diseases. The PubMed, CENTRAL (Cochrane) and Embase databases were searched for records added until September 20, 2019. The studies considered were two-arm prospective and retrospective studies comparing outcomes of interest between PK and DSAEK. Ultimately, 10 studies were included with a total of 2,634 patients (910 eyes treated with DSAEK; 1,804 eyes treated with PK). Assessment of the summary effect by meta-analysis suggested that, compared with PK treatment, DSAEK was associated with a greater improvement from baseline in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [difference (diff.) in means of change from baseline=-0.225, 95% CI=-0.341 to -0.109, P<0.001] and a reduced loss of endothelial cell density (diff. in means=-292.05 cells/mm², 95% CI=-419.53 to -146.57 cells/mm², P<0.001). Graft survival rates were similar using either PK or DSAEK (odds ratio=1.005, 95% CI=0.329-3.071, P=0.993). The overall results suggested that DSAEK may have an advantage over PK for corneal endothelial dysfunction in terms of the visual acuity outcome. The absence of definite time frames in the comparisons limits the conclusions on endothelial cell loss and graft survival.

Repeat keratoplasty in failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Purpose:

To evaluate the clinical factors associated with repeat Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) or penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in cases of failed DSAEK.

Methods:

Retrospective observational study of cases with failed DSAEK admitted to our center for a repeat keratoplasty over 5 years (January 2013–Decemeber 2017) was undertaken. Demographic and perioperative details of all cases and type of repeat keratoplasty were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze the factors affecting the type of repeat keratoplasty.

Results:

A total of 94 eyes with failed DSAEK were evaluated. Repeat DSAEK was performed in 66% and PKP in 34% of cases. Significantly increased odds for requiring PKP were observed in association with stromal scarring [odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, P = 0.018)], trainee surgeons (OR = 4.05, P = 0.008), intraoperative complications (OR = 4.58, P = 0.003), scleral fixated intraocular lens or anterior chamber intraocular lens in situ (OR = 33.8, P < 0.001), secondary glaucoma (OR = 3.02, P = 0.015), peripheral anterior synechiae (OR = 8.6, P < 0.001), preoperative corneal thickness (OR = 1.01, P < 0001), time to primary surgery (OR = 1.03, P = 0.03), post-DSAEK host thickness (OR = 1.01, P < 0.001), and time interval from graft failure to regraft (OR = 1.18, P < 0.001). All eyes with congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy, bee-sting-induced corneal decompensation, Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome, and multiple failed grafts underwent secondary PKP. All cases (nine eyes) that required surgical intervention for secondary glaucoma underwent secondary PKP (P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Repeat DSAEK is feasible in up to two-third of cases of failed DSAEK. A PKP is required in one-third of cases, and various preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors are associated with unsuitability for repeat DSAEK.

Ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: a fellow-eye comparison

Background

To compare the visual outcome and patients’ satisfaction after ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed on fellow eyes of the same patients.

Methods

In this retrospective study, the records of 18 pseudophakic patients affected by Fuchs endothelial dystrophy who underwent DMEK in one eye and UT-DSAEK in the fellow eye were reviewed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal pachymetry, keratometry, corneal aberrations, photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity, and endothelial cell counts measured 12 months after surgery in either eye were analyzed and compared. The results of a satisfaction questionnaire were also reviewed.

Results

Twelve months after surgery, BCVA was not significantly different in UT-DSAEK and DMEK eyes (0.10 ± 0.04 and 0.07 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively); at both 4- and 6 mm optical zones total and posterior corneal higher order aberrations (HOAs), posterior astigmatism and total coma were significantly lower after DMEK; BCVA in both groups was significantly correlated mainly with anterior corneal aberrations; contrast sensitivity was higher after DMEK especially in mesopic conditions and at medium spatial frequencies; the endothelial cell density was similar, although slightly higher in the UT-DSAEK group (p = 0.10). The satisfaction questionnaire showed that although patients were highly satisfied from both procedures, more than half of them preferred DMEK and reported a more comfortable and quicker postoperative recovery.

Conclusions

DMEK and UT-DSAEK showed no evidence of difference in terms of postoperative BCVA, although DMEK had a better performance in terms of contrast sensitivity, posterior corneal aberrations and overall patient satisfaction.

Proposed risk factors for failure of transplanted eye bank-prepared descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty tissues

To investigate the possible risk factors for failure of transplanted eye bank-prepared Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) tissues. In a retrospective study between March 2011 and March 2019, all the failed DSAEK cases (131 cases) reported to the Central Eye Bank of Iran were compared with a surgeon-matched successful DSAEK group (control, 126 cases) in terms of the donor, DSAEK tissue, and recipient characteristics. Univariate analysis indicated that the DSAEK tissue preparation from excised corneoscleral tissues (OR 2.17; P = 0.026) and donor conjunctival hyperemia (OR 1.62; P = 0.042) were more common in the re-DSAEK group than in the controls. Other donor and recipient characteristics as well as other DSAEK tissue criteria were not significantly different between the re-DSAEK and control groups. DSAEK lenticules in both re-DSAEK and control groups demonstrated symmetric contours. Subgroup analyses in the re-DSAEK group revealed a higher rate of surgeons' low to moderate experience in comparison to those of high experience (P < 0.001). Additionally, failed DSAEK was observed more commonly in donors aged over 50 years than among those under 30 years (P < 0.001). Our study showed that DSAEK tissues prepared from excised corneoscleral tissues and from donors with conjunctival hyperemia were associated with higher rates of re-DSAEK due to failed DSAEK. An increasing trend of re-DSAEK was observed with shorter surgeons' experience and more advanced donor's age.

Trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis of ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus DSAEK

PURPOSE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) versus standard DSAEK.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness analysis using data from a multicentre randomized clinical trial was performed. The time horizon was 12 months postoperatively. Sixty-four eyes of 64 patients with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy were included and randomized to UT-DSAEK (n = 33) or DSAEK (n = 31). Relevant resources from healthcare and societal perspectives were included in the cost analysis. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were determined using the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 questionnaire. The main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER; incremental societal costs per QALY).

RESULTS

Societal costs were €9431 (US$11 586) for UT-DSAEK and €9110 (US$11 192) for DSAEK. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were 0.74 in both groups. The ICER indicated inferiority of UT-DSAEK. The cost-effectiveness probability ranged from 37% to 42%, assuming the maximum acceptable ICER ranged from €2500-€80 000 (US$3071-US$98 280) per QALY. Additional analyses were performed omitting one UT-DSAEK patient who required a regraft [ICER €9057 (US$11 127) per QALY, cost-effectiveness probability: 44-62%] and correcting QALYs for an imbalance in baseline utilities [ICER €23 827 (US$29 271) per QALY, cost-effectiveness probability: 36-59%]. Furthermore, the ICER was €2101 (US$2581) per patient with clinical improvement in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (≥0.2 logMAR) and €3274 (US$4022) per patient with clinical improvement in National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 composite score (≥10 points).

CONCLUSION

The base case analysis favoured DSAEK, since costs of UT-DSAEK were higher while QALYs were comparable. However, additional analyses revealed no preference for UT-DSAEK or DSAEK. Further cost-effectiveness studies are required to reduce uncertainty.

Microsporidial keratitis retrospectively diagnosed by ultrastructural study of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded corneal tissue: a case report

Background

The utility of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) corneal tissue specimens for retrospective diagnosis of microsporidial keratitis was evaluated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis and the possible second case of microsporidial keratitis after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) was described.

Case presentation

A 68-year-old man presented with multiple crystalline opacities in the corneal stroma that progressed extremely slowly after DSAEK. Fungiflora Y staining of corneal scrapings from the affected regions revealed an oval microorganism. Topical voriconazole administration was ineffective and penetrating keratoplasty was performed. Histological and molecular analyses were carried out on the excised cornea. Ziehl–Neelsen staining revealed an acid-fast, oval organism that was visible by ultraviolet illumination after Fungiflora Y and Uvitex 2B staining, whereas periodic acid-Schiff and Grocott’s staining did not yield any significant findings. Microsporidium was detected by TEM of FFPE tissue. Nosema or Vittaforma sp. was suspected as the causative microorganism by PCR of FFPE tissue and by the fact that those species are known to cause eye infection. The corneal graft has maintained transparency at 1 year and half postoperatively.

Conclusions

This is the first known case of microsporidial keratitis diagnosed retrospectively by molecular and ultrastructural study of FFPE tissue, and the possible second case of microsporidial keratitis after DSAEK. Microsporidial keratitis should be considered when corneal opacity refractory to conventionally known therapy would occur after DSAEK. Our findings suggest that more microsporidial keratitis cases than have been reported to date can be identified by TEM or PCR examination of FFPE corneal specimens.

Epithelial ingrowth through venting incision into laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis flap interface after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To present a case of epithelial ingrowth into the laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap interface after a patient underwent descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery with venting incisions.

OBSERVATIONS

We present a case of a 48-year-old man with previous history of LASIK that underwent DSAEK for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy after complicated cataract surgery requiring an intraocular lens (IOL) exchange. The patient developed epithelial ingrowth into the LASIK flap interface from one of the venting incisions. The epithelial ingrowth was observed as it was a small peripheral area that did not affect his visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE

Epithelial ingrowth is a well-described complication following LASIK but has rarely been described to occur after endothelial keratoplasty (EK). Even rarer, are reports of epithelial ingrowth after EK cases that have been found to result from venting incisions. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of the ingrowth into a LASIK flap interface occurring after EK through a venting incision. Although it may be an uncommon occurrence in which a patient with a history of LASIK requires EK, surgeons should take extra precautions to avoid this complication.

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty performed by trainees

PURPOSE

To assess the surgical outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) performed by trainees.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, case control comparative study.

METHODS

This study compared cases performed by trainees with those performed by an experienced surgeon. First 10 cases of DSAEK performed by trainees with more than 6 months follow-up periods were recruited. The surgical outcomes of DSAEK performed by the trainees (Trainee group) were compared with disease-matched pairs of cases performed by an experienced surgeon (Experienced group). Graft clarity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell density, and incidence of intra- or post-operative complications were studied.

RESULTS

Forty-one pairs were recruited. The graft clarity rate was not different between the Trainee and Experienced groups, with 95.1% and 97.6%, respectively, maintaining clear grafts at 12 months postoperatively. Trainee best spectacle corrected visual acuity was significantly worse at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with the Experienced group, and percent decreases in corneal endothelial density was more in the Trainee group at 3 months following surgery (P = 0.0029). While intra- or late post-operative complication rates were similar in both groups, incidences of early post-operative complications such as double chamber formation or pupillary block were observed more frequently in the Trainee group than in the Experienced group (P = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

DSAEK can be performed relatively safely by training physicians with careful preparation and supervision by attending physicians. However, careful case selection and education on management of air injected in the anterior chamber seemed to be a key to long-term success.

Impact of venting incision on graft detachment in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the impact of venting incision on graft detachment in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Retrospective comparative study on DSAEK procedure performed with (n = 13) and without (n = 39) venting incision. Patients were treated with DSAEK for various causes of endothelial decompensation between February 2014 and April 2016. The rate of postoperative graft detachments documented on anterior segment optical coherence tomography was compared in both groups.

RESULTS:

Paracentral venting incision decreases the rate of graft displacement. Non-venting group (nvg) had 28.2% graft displacement compared to venting group (vg) which had 7.6% graft displacement.

CONCLUSION:

Venting incision is a simple and safe manoeuvre to facilitate graft adherence in DSAEK, especially in caseswith presence of high-risk factors for graft detachment.

A presentation of culture-positive corneal donors and the effect on clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Donor-to-host transmission of infectious agents is a rare but well-recognised complication of corneal transplantation and may carry a grave visual prognosis. In this case series, we describe the clinical features and risk factors of using culture-positive donor corneas for transplantation.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of a series of patients who underwent either penetrating keratoplasty (PK) or Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with positive microbiology cultivation during routine assessment of donor corneal tissue obtained at the time of surgery. Donor and recipient characteristics, tissue preparation and surgical parameters, clinical signs and outcomes were registered.

RESULTS

Eleven patients who received culture-positive corneal grafts were identified: six with Candida, three with Gram-positive bacteria and two with Gram-negative bacteria. Three patients developed clinical keratitis after routine DSAEK using corneas contaminated with Candida species. The median death-to-preservation time (DPT) of these three donor corneas was 18.08 (range 18.08 to 20.90) h, while in the remaining eight donors, it was 12.27 (range 9.32 to 20.47) h. Despite the initiation of antifungal treatment, all three cases required explantation of the graft and a subsequent re-DSAEK.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of donor corneas that are culture-positive for Candida carries a risk for developing postoperative keratitis and the risk may be higher in DSAEK. Unlike the cold storage technique employed for donor corneas described in this case series, organ culture technique requires microbiological screening and supplementation of an antifungal agent which may reduce the risk of donor-to-host transmission of fungal infection.

Uneventful Anterior Migration of Intravitreal Ozurdex Implant in a Patient with Iris-Sutured Intraocular Lens and Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

Purpose

We report here the case of a patient with anterior segment migration of intravitreal dexamethasone implant as well as its management and outcome.

Methods

The patient had the following sequence of events: complicated cataract surgery, iris-sutured intraocular lens implant, followed by cystoid macular edema treated with intravitreal Avastin, retinal vein occlusion treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant, corneal decompensation treated with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK), and finally recurrence of macular edema treated with repeated intravitreal dexamethasone implant.

Results

Dexamethasone implant had completely dissolved from the eye 12 weeks after insertion without any complication.

Conclusion

A conservative approach with regular monitoring in the situation of a quiet anterior segment without any corneal decompensation can provide enough time for the implant to dissolve without causing any complication to the involved eye, avoiding any additional surgical intervention, as presented in this case report. Despite the fact that the implant was left for natural dissolution, there were no adverse effects related to the graft or the eye.

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in phakic eyes: incision modification reducing cataract formation

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of a technical modification to reduce the incidence of traumatic cataract induced by Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) performed in phakic eyes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study. The records of all patients with a clear crystalline lens and endothelial failure that underwent modified DSAEK at our insitution were reviewed. In this modification, in order to avoid inadvertent touch of the insertion forceps against the exposed crystalline lens while passing across the anterior chamber, the incision sites were shifted from the standard 9 and 3 o'clock positions, superiorly to the 10 and 2 o'clock position respectively. Formation of typically traumatic, anterior subcapsular cataract in these patients was compared to that observed in a cohort including all the patients with a clear crystalline lens and endothelial failure that underwent conventional DSAEK at our institution.

RESULTS

The study group included 49 eyes following modified DSAEK and the control group included 35 eyes following DSAEK with conventional incision sites. Anterior subcapsular cataract occurring 4mo or less postoperatively was identified in 2 of 49 (4%) eyes in the study group and 7 of 35 (20%) eyes in the control group. The rates of traumatic cataract were significantly higher in the control group in comparison to the study group (P=0.03, RR=4.9, 95%CI 1.08-22.1).

CONCLUSION

Traumatic cataract formation following phakic DSAEK may be avoided with a simple modification to the position of the incision sites.

Endothelial keratoplasty for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in a 4-month-old infant

Purpose

To report a case of endothelial keratoplasties (EKs) performed in a 4 month old with a posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy.

Observations

A 4 month old infant underwent Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. The graft was found to be dislocated on day 5 post-operatively and an attempt to unfold the DMEK scroll and re-bubble was not successful. The patient was then treated successfully with bilateral Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). At 3 years of follow-up, her visual acuity was 20/70 in the right and 20/60 in the left eye with good endothelial cell counts.

Conclusions and importance

and Importance: This study reports the youngest case of EKs performed at the age of 4 months in an infant. This is also the first reported case of attempted DMEK highlighting its challenges in infants. DSAEK remains a good treatment option for endothelial dysfunction secondary to posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy in infants even after failed DMEK.

Outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using imported donor corneas

Background

The lack of development of local donor tissue acquisition in several regions of the world has resulted in the necessity of performing keratoplasty with imported donor corneas. The greatest concern about the use of donor corneas supplied by foreign eye banks is the effect of the increased donor death-to-operation time which inevitably occurs during the tissue recovery, tissue processing, and tissue transfer between the countries. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using imported donor corneas.

Methods

This retrospective, non-comparative case series investigated the outcomes of the 102 consecutive DSAEK procedures using imported donor corneas performed at a single university-based hospital between August 2006–2014. The main outcome measures were postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (ECD), and complications.

Results

The mean death-to-operation time was 9.52 ± 1.48 days (range, 8–13). The mean preoperative ECD was 2761 ± 285 cells/mm². Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy was the predominant indication for grafting. The mean follow-up duration was 65.3 months. Ninety-three eyes had improved vision postoperatively (91.18%). BCVA unchanged in 3 eyes due to preexisting macular scar and advanced glaucoma. Primary graft failure occurred in 6 eyes (5.88%). Of the 93 eyes with improved BCVA, 100% had their best corrected vision within the first 1 year. The mean ECD at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 60 months after surgery was 1762 ± 294 cells/mm², 1681 ± 284 cells/mm², 1579 ± 209 cells/mm², 1389 ± 273 cells/mm², and 1251 ± 264 cells/mm² respectively. The mean ECD loss at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and 5 years after surgery was 36.2%, 39.1%, 42.8%, 49.7%, and 54.7% respectively. The most common complication was graft detachment/dislocation (10.78%). There were no cases of any postoperative infection.

Conclusions

DSAEK with imported donor corneas provides rapid and good visual rehabilitation. The percentages of endothelial cell loss were comparable to those achieved in Western series using domestic corneas in which fresher tissues were available for transplantation.

Evaluation of factors affecting visual acuity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To elucidate the factors affecting visual acuity after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive patients who underwent primary DSAEK for corneal endothelial dysfunction at Inouye Eye Hospital from January 2010 through January 2015 and who had a follow-up of at least 6 months. Fifty-four eyes of 49 patients (24 men and 25 women) were enrolled; the mean age was 72.5 ± 8.7 years. Medical charts were retrospectively examined for best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), intraocular pressure, keratometric value, keratometric cylinder, grade of preoperative corneal edema, preoperative graft thickness, and endothelial cell density (ECD) before and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. A multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the factors associated with BSCVA at 3, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Explanatory variables included age, sex, preoperative factors (BSCVA, degree of corneal edema, donor ECD, and graft thickness), and factors at each time point (keratometric value, keratometric cylinder, and intraocular pressure).

RESULTS

The mean logarithms of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) BSCVA preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were 1.03 ± 0.49, 0.42 ± 0.26, 0.29 ± 0.21, 0.24 ± 0.20, and 0.22 ± 0.20, respectively. Multiple regression analysis showed that preoperative BSCVA alone was significantly associated with BSCVA at 3, 6, and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

A better preoperative BSCVA was associated with a better BSCVA after DSAEK, which suggests that DSAEK should be considered earlier than stromal changes such as subepithelial fibrosis occurrence.

Patch Grafting Using a Cryopreserved Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Flap for Treating Corneal Perforation

A 73-year-old woman with a corneal perforation of undetermined etiology was treated with corneal patch grafting. A residual partial-thickness corneal button obtained during a previous Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) surgery and stored at -80°C in Optisol GS for 3 months was used as a patch graft. Five days postoperatively, the anterior chamber was reformed and the perforation was masked by the donor cornea. During the next several weeks, gradual displacement of the anterior edge of the donor cornea in the limbal direction occurred. Seven weeks postoperatively, further displacement of the donor cornea resulted in unmasking of the perforated area. At this time, the corneal defect was closed by stromal scar tissue and corneal epithelium. Five months postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity was 1.0 without marked astigmatism and intraocular pressure was 9 mm Hg in the left eye. From this case, we learned that cryopreserved DSAEK flaps stored longer than reported previously can be used as patch grafts to treat emergency conditions. Scar tissue can fill a corneal stromal defect 1 mm in diameter during temporary patch grafting for less than 2 months.

Elevated Intraocular Pressure after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with a Trabeculectomy: A Case Series

We report a case series of three patients with previous trabeculectomies who developed elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) in the immediate postoperative period after routine Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). All patients had functioning trabeculectomies preoperatively, and developed elevated IOP between 41 and 69 mm Hg within 24 hours following DSAEK surgery. The IOP was successfully controlled in all patients with topical IOP-lowering medications and oral acetazolamide, with the addition of ocular massage and release of aqueous for two patients. Thereafter, all patients maintained well-controlled IOPs. Patients with trabeculectomies should be followed-up closely immediately after DSAEK to monitor for raised IOP. The mechanism for this pressure rise is uncertain, but may involve air in the trabeculectomy sclerostomy or bleb resulting in blockage of aqueous flow.

How to cite this article: Sheales MPH, Chan E, Ang GS, Kong YXG. Elevated Intraocular Pressure after Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in Patients with a Trabeculectomy: A Case Series. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2015;9(3):100-103.

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty using corneas from elderly donors

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) using corneas from elderly donors.

METHODS

A total of 90 eyes that underwent DSAEK at Juntendo University Hospital between January 2008 and December 2012 were divided into two groups. Group 1 was eyes that received corneas from elderly donors aged 80 years or older (29 eyes), and group 2 was eyes that received corneas from donors aged 79 years or younger (61 eyes). Patient characteristics and visual acuity, endothelial cell density, and postoperative complications at 2 years after surgery were examined retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of the donors was 86.3 ± 28.9 years (range, 80-98 years) in group 1 and 62.1 ± 23.2 years (range, 26-79 years) in group 2. At 2 years after surgery, median logMAR visual acuity was 0.48 ± 0.38 in group 1 and 0.42 ± 0.47 in group 2, while the median loss of endothelial cell density was 38.9 ± 22.5 % and 39.7 ± 23.8 %, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups for all the parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of endothelial cell loss at 2 years after surgery was similar regardless of donor age (≥80 years vs ≤79 years). It seems reasonable to use corneas from donors aged 80 years or older for DSAEK provided the selection criteria are fulfilled.

Suture pull-through insertion of graft donor in Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: Results of 4-year follow-up

Purpose:

To report our clinical experience and 4-year follow-up results of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with the suture pull-through insertion technique.

Methods:

This is a retrospective study of 195 eyes in which a posterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed between 2007 and 2011. The insertion of a folded donor lenticule was performed with a double-armed 10-0 suture using a straight transchamber needle and half-circle needle. Endothelial cell density was measured annually up to 4 years after the surgery, and cell loss was calculated based on the median preoperative donor endothelial cell density. Postoperative complications, primary graft failure, pupillary block, and dislocation of the donor tissue were assessed.

Results:

All patients underwent uncomplicated DSAEK. Data were available for 195 eyes (100%) at 1 year, 186 eyes (95.3%) at 2 years, 176 eyes (90.2%) at 3 years, and 160 eyes (82%) at 4 years. Median preop-erative donor endothelial cell density was 2688 cells/mm² [interquartile range (IQR) 207.5 cells/mm²], which decreased by 27% at 1 year (1956 cells/mm², IQR 264.8 cells/mm²), 31% at 2 years (1855 cells/mm², IQR 320.5 cells/mm²), 35% at 3 years (1756.5 cells/mm², IQR 306.5 cells/mm²), and 36% at 4 years (1709.5 cells/mm², IQR 288,0 cells/mm²). Nine patients (4.6%) had a dislocation of donor tissue; all were successfully reattached with a second air injection. Only three eyes (1.5%) developed graft failure. Pupillary block was present in 15 eyes (7.7%).

Conclusion:

DSAEK with suture pull-through insertion of donor graft represents a simplified and safe technique that has endothelial cell loss comparable with other techniques and low rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Histologically proven epithelial ingrowth in failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) managed by repeat DSAEK

Purpose

To report a case of corneal graft failure due to epithelial ingrowth after an uneventful combined Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and phacoemulsification cataract surgery with intraocular lens implant treated successfully with a repeat DSAEK.

Methods

A 77-year-old male patient underwent combined DSAEK and phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implant implantation for Fuchs’ endothelial dystrophy plus cataract in the right eye. The donor cornea was cut on the Moria ALTK system and introduced using a suture pull-through technique. After an episode of endothelial rejection, the graft failed, with signs suggesting epithelial ingrowth. It was stripped from the host cornea using a Descemet’s membrane stripper, and a Simcoe irrigation-aspiration cannula was used to remove all traces of interface material. The excised lenticule was examined histologically using a hematoxylin and eosin stain.

Result

The patient regained and maintained excellent visual acuity with no sign of recurrence of epithelial ingrowth. Histopathological evaluation of the donor tissue of the first graft showed epithelial ingrowth on the stromal surface of the graft and very few endothelial cells, in keeping with the diagnosis of graft failure.

Conclusion

Epithelial ingrowth is a possible cause of endothelial graft failure, but histologically proven cases are rare. Surgical intervention can achieve successful clearance, with the potential for cure and an excellent outcome.

Initial experience with Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in Saudi Arabia

Purpose:

To analyze the visual results of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the first consecutive 10 cases.

Materials and Methods:

Retrospective, non-randomized, non-comparative interventional case series. Ten eyes of 10 patients with endothelial dysfunctions of different etiology, scheduled for DSEAK, were included in this study. Indications, operative problems, and postoperative complications were noted. Best-corrected visual acuity, refractive and keratometric astigmatism, and central corneal thickness were analyzed for each patient after a minimum follow-up of 10 months.

Results:

In a median follow-up of 12 months (range 10–16 months), visual outcomes were satisfactory. Preoperative diagnosis included five eyes of psuedophakic bullous keratopathy and two eyes of repeated failed corneal grafts and one bullous keratopathy secondary to anterior chamber phakic IOL implantation. Two eyes with Fuchs dystrophy and cataract had combined DSAEK and phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. One patient had known glaucomatous optic nerve precluding vision better than 20/150. Of the remaining nine patients, four eyes had BSCVA of 20/40 or better by postoperative 6 months (3 by 3 months). The average pachymetry was 646.9 μm. One patient had total graft dislocation and one needed trabeculectomy. None of the patients developed graft rejection or graft failure. None of patients needed to convert to penetrating keratoplasty.

Conclusion:

DSAEK is safe and effective procedure in patients with endothelial dysfunctions with encouraging surgical and visual outcomes.