1
|
Prior C, Swales H, Sharman M, Reed N, Bommer N, Kent A, Glanemann B, Clarke K, Kortum A, Kelly D, Lea C, Roberts E, Rutherford L, Tamborini A, Murphy K, Batchelor DJ, Calleja S, Burrow R, Jamieson P, Best M, Borgonovi S, Calvo-Saiz I, Elgueta I, Piazza C, Gil Morales C, Hrovat A, Keane M, Kennils J, Lopez E, Spence S, Izaguirre E, Hernandez-Perello M, Lau N, Paul A, Ridyard A, Shales C, Shelton E, Farges A, Specchia G, Espada L, Fowlie SJ, Tappin S, Van den Steen N, Sparks TH, Allerton F. Diagnostic findings in sinonasal aspergillosis in dogs in the United Kingdom: 475 cases (2011-2021). J Small Anim Pract 2024. [PMID: 38679786 DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the diagnostic tests used and their comparative performance in dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis in the United Kingdom. A secondary objective was to describe the signalment, clinical findings and common clinicopathologic abnormalities in sinonasal aspergillosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multi-centre retrospective survey was performed involving 23 referral centres in the United Kingdom to identify dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis from January 2011 to December 2021. Dogs were included if fungal plaques were seen during rhinoscopy or if ancillary testing (via histopathology, culture, cytology, serology or PCR) was positive and other differential diagnoses were excluded. RESULTS A total of 662 cases were entered into the database across the 23 referral centres. Four hundred and seventy-five cases met the study inclusion criteria. Of these, 419 dogs had fungal plaques and compatible clinical signs. Fungal plaques were not seen in 56 dogs with turbinate destruction that had compatible clinical signs and a positive ancillary test result. Ancillary diagnostics were performed in 312 of 419 (74%) dogs with observed fungal plaques permitting calculation of sensitivity of cytology as 67%, fungal culture 59%, histopathology 47% and PCR 71%. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The sensitivities of ancillary diagnostics in this study were lower than previously reported challenging the clinical utility of such tests in sinonasal aspergillosis. Treatment and management decisions should be based on a combination of diagnostics including imaging findings, visual inspection, and ancillary testing, rather than ancillary tests alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Prior
- Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Solihull, UK
| | - H Swales
- Moorview Referrals, Cramlington, UK
| | | | - N Reed
- Veterinary Specialists Scotland, Livingston, UK
| | - N Bommer
- Veterinary Specialists Scotland, Livingston, UK
| | - A Kent
- Blaise Veterinary Referral Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - K Clarke
- Davies Veterinary Specialists, Hitchin, UK
| | - A Kortum
- Cambridge Veterinary School, Cambridge, UK
| | - D Kelly
- Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood, UK
| | - C Lea
- Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood, UK
| | - E Roberts
- Bristol Veterinary Specialists, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | - K Murphy
- Rowe Veterinary Referrals, Bristol, UK
| | - D J Batchelor
- School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK
| | - S Calleja
- Lumbry Park Veterinary Specialists, Hampshire, UK
| | - R Burrow
- Northwest Veterinary Specialists, Runcorn, UK
| | - P Jamieson
- VetsNow 24/7 Emergency & Specialty Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Best
- Eastcott Veterinary Referrals, Swindon, UK
| | | | | | - I Elgueta
- VetsNow 24/7 Emergency & Specialty Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Piazza
- Scarsdale Vets Pride Veterinary Centre, Derby, UK
| | | | - A Hrovat
- Scarsdale Vets Pride Veterinary Centre, Derby, UK
| | - M Keane
- School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK
| | - J Kennils
- Langford Veterinary Services Ltd, Langford, UK
| | - E Lopez
- Langford Veterinary Services Ltd, Langford, UK
| | - S Spence
- North Downs Specialist Referrals, Surrey, UK
| | - E Izaguirre
- North Downs Specialist Referrals, Surrey, UK
| | | | - N Lau
- Davies Veterinary Specialists, Hitchin, UK
| | - A Paul
- Anderson Moores Veterinary Specialists, Hampshire, UK
| | - A Ridyard
- University of Glasgow Small Animal Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - C Shales
- Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Solihull, UK
| | - E Shelton
- The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK
| | - A Farges
- University of Glasgow Small Animal Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - G Specchia
- Scarsdale Vets Pride Veterinary Centre, Derby, UK
| | - L Espada
- University of Glasgow Small Animal Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - S J Fowlie
- Southfields Veterinary Specialists, Essex, UK
| | - S Tappin
- Dick White Referrals, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - T H Sparks
- Waltham Petcare Science Institute, Leicestershire, UK
| | - F Allerton
- Willows Veterinary Centre and Referral Service, Part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Solihull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Roberts PK, Keane M, Yang G, Chan E, Harkin DG, McKirdy N, Daniell M. Comparison of penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty in patients with iridocorneal endothelial syndrome: A registry study. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2023; 51:663-672. [PMID: 37608637 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare graft survival of endothelial keratoplasty (EK) versus penetrating keratoplasty (PK) in patients with iridocorneal endothelial (ICE) syndrome and identify ocular features associated with graft survival. METHODS Observational, prospective, cohort study. A total of 30 806 first grafts performed between 1985 and 2020 were identified through the Australian Corneal Graft Registry and included in this observational, prospective cohort study. A total of 196 eyes underwent a primary corneal graft for ICE syndrome. Kaplan-Meier graft survival plots and Chi-squared tests were performed to identify graft survival rates for EK and PK. A history of raised intraocular pressure (IOP) was also recorded and analysed. Graft survival of eyes with ICE syndrome were compared to that of other indications. RESULTS Grafts performed for ICE syndrome increased to 0.8% of all cases during the 2005 to 2020 period compared with 0.5% between 1985 to 2004 (χ2 =9.35, p = 0.002). From 2010, EK surpassed PK as the preferred graft type. Survival of primary grafts in eyes with ICE syndrome was lower than for other indications (log-rank = 56.62, p < 0.001). Graft survival was higher following PK than Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DS(A)EK) (log-rank = 10.56, p = 0.001). Graft survival was higher in eyes without a history of raised IOP compared to those with a reported history of raised IOP (log-rank = 13.06, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS ICE syndrome carries a poor prognosis for graft survival. DS(A)EK had a poorer prognosis than PK. A history of raised IOP is associated with higher risk of graft failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp K Roberts
- Corneal Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Miriam Keane
- Australian Corneal Graft Registry, Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gink Yang
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elsie Chan
- Corneal Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Damien G Harkin
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Natalie McKirdy
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mark Daniell
- Corneal Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Newsome RF, Mostyn A, Wilson JP, Alibhai A, Bollard N, Randall L, Chagunda MGG, Sturrock CJ, Keane M, Green M, Huxley JN, Rutland CS. Morphology, adipocyte size, and fatty acid analysis of dairy cattle digital cushions, and the effect of body condition score and age. J Dairy Sci 2021; 104:6238-6252. [PMID: 33685700 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2020-19388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The digital cushion is an essential part of maintaining a healthy foot, working to dissipate foot strike and body weight forces and lameness from claw horn disruption lesions. Despite the importance of the digital cushion, little is known about the basic anatomy, adipocyte morphology, and fatty acid composition in relation to age, limb position, and body condition score. In total, 60 claws (from 17 cows) were selected and collected from a herd, ensuring that body condition score data and computed micro-tomography were known for each animal. Digital cushion tissue underwent histological staining combined with stereology, systematic random sampling, and cell morphology analysis, in addition to lipid extraction followed by fatty acid analysis. The results describe digital cushion architecture and adipocyte sizes. Adipocyte size was similar across all 4 claws (distal left lateral and medial and distal right lateral and medial) and across the ages (aged 2-7 yr); however, animals with body condition score of 3.00 or more at slaughter had a significantly increased cell size in comparison to those with a score of less than 2.50. Of 37 fatty acid methyl esters identified, 5 differed between either the body condition score or different age groups. C10:0 capric acid, C14:0 myristic acid, C15:0 pentadecanoic acid, and C20:0 arachidic acid percentages were all lesser in lower body condition score cows, whereas C22:1n-9 erucic acid measurements were lesser in younger cows. Saturated fatty acid, monounsaturated fatty acid, and polyunsaturated fatty acid percentages were not altered in the different claws, ages, or body condition score groups. Triglyceride quantities did not differ for claw position or age but had decreased quantities in lower body condition score animals. Digital cushion anatomy, cellular morphology, and fatty acid composition have been described in general and also in animals with differing ages, body condition scores, and in the differing claws. Understanding fat deposition, mobilization, and composition are essential in not only understanding the roles that the digital cushion plays but also in preventing disorders and maintaining cattle health and welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R F Newsome
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - A Mostyn
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom; School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom
| | - J P Wilson
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - A Alibhai
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - N Bollard
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - L Randall
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - M G G Chagunda
- Scotland's Rural College, Kings Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, United Kingdom, and Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry in the Tropics and Subtropics, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - C J Sturrock
- Hounsfield Facility, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - M Keane
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - M Green
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom
| | - J N Huxley
- School of Veterinary Science, Massey University, Private Bag 11-222, Palmerston North, New Zealand
| | - C S Rutland
- School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Sutton Bonington, Leicestershire, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Page DE, Rimmer J, Keane M, Manikappa S, Butzbach D, Giddings C. Is atomised intranasal cocaine systemically absorbed during endoscopic sinus surgery? Rhinology 2019; 57:200-205. [PMID: 30629049 DOI: 10.4193/rhin18.207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to perform endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) safely and efficiently, preparation of the nasal mucosa with vasoconstrictor agents is crucial to minimise bleeding. There is no single best method, although traditionally cocaine has been the agent of choice. However, there have been concerns over the potential for systemic side effects when applied topically. With this concern in mind, there exists limited contemporary research looking at cocaine absorption in the context of ESS. This study aims to determine the amount and duration of systemic cocaine absorption after intranasal atomised administration of modified Moffett’s solution prior to ESS. METHODOLOGY Twelve adults undergoing ESS were enrolled. Modified Moffett's solution containing 100 mg cocaine hydrochloride and 1 mg of adrenaline was administered topically 5 minutes prior to surgery. Serum cocaine and the cocaine degradation product, benzoylecgonine, were measured at specific time points up to 12 hrs post administration. RESULTS Peak plasma cocaine concentration occurred between 60 and 120 minutes post-administration (range 13-31 micrograms/L). The mean peak plasma concentration was 20.35 micrograms/L occurring at 120 minutes post-administration. Benzoylecgonine was detected in 11 subjects at 60 minutes post-administration and in all subjects 12 hours post-administration of cocaine. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that there are low levels of systemic absorption of cocaine when administered in an atomised modified Moffett’s formulation prior to endoscopic sinus surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D E Page
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - J Rimmer
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Keane
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - D Butzbach
- Forensic Science, South Australia, Australia
| | - C Giddings
- Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Coleman RE, Collinson M, Gregory W, Marshall H, Bell R, Dodwell D, Keane M, Gil M, Barrett-Lee P, Ritchie D, Bowman A, Liversedge V, De Boer RH, Passos-Coelho JL, O'Reilly S, Bertelli G, Joffe J, Brown JE, Wilson C, Tercero JC, Jean-Mairet J, Gomis R, Cameron D. Benefits and risks of adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid in stage II/III breast cancer. 10 years follow-up of the AZURE randomized clinical trial (BIG 01/04). J Bone Oncol 2018; 13:123-135. [PMID: 30591866 PMCID: PMC6303395 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2018.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Adjuvant bisphosphonates improve disease outcomes in postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) but the long-term effects are poorly described. The AZURE trial (ISRCTN79831382) was designed to determine whether adjuvant zoledronic acid (ZOL) improves disease outcomes in EBC. Previous analyses showed no effect on overall outcomes but identified benefits in postmenopausal women. Here we present the long-term risks and benefits of adjuvant ZOL with 10-years follow-up. Patients and methods 3360 patients with stage II/III breast cancer were included in an academic, international, phase III, randomized, open label trial. Patients were followed up on a regular schedule until 10 years. Patients were randomized on a 1:1 basis to standard adjuvant systemic therapy +/− intravenous ZOL 4 mg every 3–4 weeks x6, and then at reduced frequency to complete 5 years treatment. The primary outcome was disease free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included invasive DFS (IDFS), overall survival (OS), sites of recurrence, skeletal morbidity and treatment outcomes according to primary tumor amplification of the transcription factor, MAF. Pre-planned subgroup analyses focused on interactions between menopausal status and treatment effects. Results With a median follow up of 117 months [IQR 70.4–120.4), DFS and IDFS were similar in both arms (HRDFS = 0.94, 95%CI = 0.84–1.06, p = 0.340; HRIDFS = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.82–1.02, p = 0.116). However, outcomes remain improved with ZOL in postmenopausal women (HRDFS = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.67–1.00; HRIDFS = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.64–0.94). In the 79% of tested women with a MAF FISH negative tumor, ZOL improved IDFS (HRIDFS = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.58–0.97) and OS HROS = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.50–0.94), irrespective of menopause. ZOL did not improve disease outcomes in MAF FISH + tumors. Bone metastases as a first DFS recurrence (BDFS) were reduced with ZOL (HRB-DFS = 0.76, 95%CI = 0.63–0.92, p = 0.005). ZOL reduced skeletal morbidity with fewer fractures and skeletal events after disease recurrence. 30 cases of osteonecrosis of the jaw in the ZOL arm (1.8%) have occurred. Conclusions Disease benefits with adjuvant ZOL in postmenopausal early breast cancer persist at 10 years of follow-up. The biomarker MAF identified a patient subgroup that derived benefit from ZOL irrespective of menopausal status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R E Coleman
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology and Sheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Center, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK
| | - M Collinson
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - W Gregory
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - H Marshall
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R Bell
- Andrew Love Cancer Centre, Geelong, Australia
| | - D Dodwell
- St James Institute of Oncology, University of Leeds, UK
| | - M Keane
- University Hospital Galway, Ireland
| | - M Gil
- Institut Català d´Oncologia - IDIBELL. L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - D Ritchie
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - A Bowman
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - V Liversedge
- Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - R H De Boer
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | | | - J Joffe
- Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK
| | - J E Brown
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology and Sheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Center, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK
| | - C Wilson
- Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology and Sheffield Experimental Cancer Medicine Center, Weston Park Hospital, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2SJ, UK
| | | | | | - R Gomis
- Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona), Barcelona Science and Technology Institute, CIBERONC and Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Cameron
- Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prior L, Teo M, Greally M, Ward C, O'Leary C, Aslam R, Darwish W, Ahmed N, Watson G, Kelly D, Kiely L, Hassan A, Gleeson J, Featherstone H, Lim M, Murray H, Gallagher D, Westrup J, Hennessy B, Leonard G, Grogan L, Breathnach O, Horgan A, Coate L, O'Mahony D, Coate L, O'Reilly S, Gupta R, Keane M, Duffy K, O'Connor M, Kennedy J, McCaffrey J, Higgins M, Kelly C, Carney D, Gullo G, Crown J, Walshe J. Abstract P6-08-17: Pregnancy associated breast cancer: Evaluating maternal outcomes. A multicentre study. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-p6-08-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Pregnancy associated breast cancer (PABC) is defined as breast cancer (BC) diagnosed during the gestational period (GP) or in the first year postpartum (PP). Despite its infrequent occurrence, the incidence of PABC appears to be rising due to the increasing propensity for women to delay childbirth. We have established the first combined prospective and retrospective registry study of PABC in Ireland to examine specific clinicopathological characteristics, treatments and maternal outcomes. We present the retrospective findings to date.
Methods
We performed a retrospective multicentre observational study of patients (pts) with PABC treated in the eight Irish cancer centres from August 2001 to March 2017. Data extracted included information on pt demographics, tumour biology, staging, treatment administered and maternal outcomes. Standard biostatistical methods were used for analysis.
Results
111 PABC patients were identified. Sixty pts (54%) were diagnosed during the GP and 51 (46%) within 1 year PP. Median age at diagnosis was 36 years (yrs). Table 1 illustrates baseline characteristics. Two thirds of pts were node positive and a similar proportion had grade 3 pathology. Seventy pts (63%) were estrogen receptor (ER) positive, 36 (32%) HER2 positive, 25 (22%) triple negative. Twenty-two pts (20%) were metastatic at presentation. Seven pts (6%) had a known BRCA 1/2 mutation. The median OS (overall survival) and DFS (disease free survival) for the entire cohort was 107.4 and 94.2 months respectively (resp). There was no survival difference between those diagnosed during the GP versus PP. 5 yr DFS and OS was 68.6% and 69.2% resp. This compares unfavourably to results reported by the National Cancer Registry of Ireland in a similar age-matched BC population between 2000-2012 where the 5 yr OS was 86.5%. Variables in our study associated with poorer outcomes included younger age, tumour size, node positivity and lack of estrogen expression.
Baseline characteristics PABC patients (n=11) %(n)Diagnosed in GP (n=60) %(n)Diagnosed 1yr PP (n=51) %(n)p valueDemographic Age at diagnosis3636(25-49)36(21-44)0.31Stage I-II54(60)55(33)53(27)0.85III23(26)23(14)23(12)1IV20(22)18(11)22(11)0.81Unknown3(3)3(2)2(1)1Pathology Grade 366(74)70(42)63(32)0.43Node positive66(73)68(41)63(32)0.55ER+/HER2-41(45)38(23)43(22)0.69ER+/HER2+23(25)28(17)16(8)0.17ER-/HER2+14(16)17(10)12(6)0.59Triple negative22(25)17(10)29(15)0.11Surgery Breast conservation23(26)25(15)21(11)0.82Mastectomy56(63)57(34)59(30)0.84Adjuavnt/Neoadjuvant treatment Chemotherapy73(81)77(46)69(35)0.39Anthracycline68(55)78(36)54(19)0.03Taxane89(72)93(43)83(29)0.16Anti HER2 agent21(23)18(11)24(12)0.63Endocrine therapy64(52)63(29)66(23)0.84Radiotherapy79(64)74(34)86(30)0.85Relapse in Stage I-III Local relapse15(13)12(6)18(7)0.55Distant relapse24(21)22(11)25(10)0.80
Conclusions
PABC patients may have a poorer outcome. Our study reported higher rates of triple negative and HER2 positive breast cancer which are associated with more aggressive biology. Prospective evaluation of clinicopathological features, pharmacokinetics of treatments selected and maternal and fetal outcomes is imperative in this distinct pt group.
Citation Format: Prior L, Teo M, Greally M, Ward C, O'Leary C, Aslam R, Darwish W, Ahmed N, Watson G, Kelly D, Kiely L, Hassan A, Gleeson J, Featherstone H, Lim M, Murray H, Gallagher D, Westrup J, Hennessy B, Leonard G, Grogan L, Breathnach O, Horgan A, Coate L, O'Mahony D, Coate L, O'Reilly S, Gupta R, Keane M, Duffy K, O'Connor M, Kennedy J, McCaffrey J, Higgins M, Kelly C, Carney D, Gullo G, Crown J, Walshe J. Pregnancy associated breast cancer: Evaluating maternal outcomes. A multicentre study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-08-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Prior
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Teo
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Greally
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Ward
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C O'Leary
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R Aslam
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - W Darwish
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - N Ahmed
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Watson
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Kelly
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - L Kiely
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A Hassan
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Gleeson
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - M Lim
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - H Murray
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - J Westrup
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - G Leonard
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - L Grogan
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - A Horgan
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - L Coate
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - L Coate
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - R Gupta
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - K Duffy
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - J Kennedy
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - M Higgins
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Kelly
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Carney
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Gullo
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Crown
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Walshe
- Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keegan NM, Walshe J, Gullo G, Kennedy J, Bulger K, Kelly CM, Crown J, Toomey S, Egan K, Kerr J, Given M, Hernando A, Teiserskiene A, Grogan L, Breathnach O, Morris PG, Keane M, Hennessy BT. Abstract OT3-06-05: A phase Ib/II trial of coPANlisib in combination with tratuzumab in pretreated recurrent or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer “PantHER”. Cancer Res 2018. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-ot3-06-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway is important in the oncogenic function of HER2. Aberrent activation of PI3K is implicated in resistance to trastuzumab and other HER2-targeted therapies and is frequent, with up to 22% of HER2 positive breast cancer having a PIK3CA mutation. Copanlisib is a pan-class 1 PI3K inhibitor that shows particular activity against PI3Kα, the isoform encoded by the PIK3CA gene. Copanlisib has been shown to re-sensitise trastuzumab resistant cell lines to trastuzumab with synergism seen in some cell lines between copanlisib and HER2 targeted therapy.
Trial design
The study is a phase Ib/II open label, single arm adaptive, multi-centre trial of copanlisib in combination with trastuzumab. Eligible patients are treated with a dose escalation schedule of copanlisib IV on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle with trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly (loading dose of 4 mg/kg in cycle 1). The phase II dose will be based on the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) established in Phase Ib. Patients are treated until radiologic or symptomatic progression, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal or physician's decision.
Eligibility criteria
Eligible patients must have recurrent incurable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer that has progressed on at least one prior line of trastuzumab or T-DM1-based treatment regimen in this setting. Patients with treated and controlled brain metastases are eligible. Participants must have adequate organ function and ECOG PS ≤ 2. Patients recruited for the Phase II part of the study must have a PIK3CA mutation. Patients with uncontrolled arterial hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes or recent clinically serious infections are excluded.
Specific aims
The primary end point for the phase Ib part of this study is to determine the MTD for the combination. For the phase II study is anti-tumour efficacy, measured by Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR).
Secondary end points are evaluation of safety and tolerability, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, duration of response and overall survival. Incorporated translational endpoints include examination of molecular tumor adaptation in tissue and blood. Given the role of PI3K in cellular glucose metabolism, an additional exploratory objective is to determine if quantitive reduction in metabolic signal on Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) is predictive of benefit from therapy.
Statistical methods
To establish the MTD, we use a modified 3+3 design where 3 additional patients will be accrued even if the first 3 patients accrued experience no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) in sequential cohorts for a planned 12 patients. To determine the CBR, a one sample exact binomial test with a one sided significance level of 5%, 19 evaluable patients will provide >80% power to detect a difference between the null hypothesis proportion of 30% for CBR versus the alternative hypothesis proportion of 65%.
Present accrual and target accrual
There are 9 patients recruited so far to the phase Ib part of this study. Target accrual is 12 and for phase II is 19 patients.
Contact information for people with a specific interest in the trial
Prof Bryan Hennessy, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin Ireland
Funded by Bayer
Citation Format: Keegan NM, Walshe J, Gullo G, Kennedy J, Bulger K, Kelly CM, Crown J, Toomey S, Egan K, Kerr J, Given M, Hernando A, Teiserskiene A, Grogan L, Breathnach O, Morris PG, Keane M, Hennessy BT. A phase Ib/II trial of coPANlisib in combination with tratuzumab in pretreated recurrent or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer “PantHER” [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-06-05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NM Keegan
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - J Walshe
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - G Gullo
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - J Kennedy
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - K Bulger
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - CM Kelly
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - J Crown
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - S Toomey
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - K Egan
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - J Kerr
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - M Given
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - A Hernando
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - A Teiserskiene
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - L Grogan
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - O Breathnach
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - PG Morris
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - BT Hennessy
- RCSI Molecular Medicine, Dublin, Ireland; Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Midland Regional Hospital at Tullamore, Tullamore, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Clinical Trials & Research Unit, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gilhooley E, Fahy C, Hanrahan E, Keane M, Swan N, Lally A. Multiple cutaneous and uterine leiomyomata with features of benign metastasing leiomyomatosis: a novel mutation of the fumarate hydratase gene. Clin Exp Dermatol 2017; 43:334-335. [PMID: 29266330 DOI: 10.1111/ced.13332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- E Gilhooley
- Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - C Fahy
- Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - E Hanrahan
- Department of Oncology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - N Swan
- Department of Histopathology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - A Lally
- Department of Dermatology, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kelly C, Feighery R, McCaffrey J, Higgins M, Smith M, O'Reilly S, Murphy C, Horgan A, Walshe J, McDermott R, O'Donnell D, Morris P, Keane M, Martin M, Duffy K, Mihai A, Armstrong J, Mulroe E, Murphy V, Kelly C. Do oncology patients understand clinical trials? A nationwide study by Cancer Trials Ireland. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx440.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
10
|
Kelly C, Feighery R, McCaffrey J, Higgins M, Smith M, O'Reilly S, Horgan A, Walshe J, McDermott R, O'Donnell D, Morris P, Keane M, Martin M, Murphy C, Duffy K, Mihai A, Armstrong J, Mulroe E, Murphy V, Kelly C. Decisions and supports around clinical trial participation: A national study by Cancer Trials Ireland. Ann Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx385.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
11
|
Boland MR, McVeigh TP, O'Flaherty N, Gullo G, Keane M, Quinn CM, McDermott EW, Lowery AJ, Kerin MJ, Prichard RS. Impact of receptor phenotype on nodal burden in patients with breast cancer who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. BJS Open 2017; 1:39-45. [PMID: 29951604 PMCID: PMC5989970 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2017] [Accepted: 05/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Optimal evaluation and management of the axilla following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with node‐positive breast cancer remains controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of receptor phenotype in patients with nodal metastases who undergo NAC to see whether this approach can identify those who may be suitable for conservative axillary management. Methods Between 2009 and 2014, all patients with breast cancer and biopsy‐proven nodal disease who received NAC were identified from prospectively developed databases. Details of patients who had axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) following NAC were recorded and rates of pathological complete response (pCR) were evaluated for receptor phenotype. Results Some 284 patients with primary breast cancer and nodal metastases underwent NAC and subsequent ALND, including two with bilateral disease. The most common receptor phenotype was luminal A (154 of 286 tumours, 53·8 per cent), with lesser proportions accounted for by the luminal B–Her2 type (64, 22·4 per cent), Her2‐overexpressing (38, 13·3 per cent) and basal‐like, triple‐negative (30, 10·5 per cent) subtypes. Overall pCR rates in the breast and axilla were 19·9 per cent (54 of 271 tumours) and 37·4 per cent (105 of 281) respectively. Axillary pCR rates were highest in the Her2‐overexpressing group (27 of 35, 77 per cent) and lowest in the luminal A group (35 of 153, 22·9 per cent) (P < 0·001). Nodal burden (median number of positive nodes excised) was lower in the Her2‐overexpressing group compared with the luminal A group (0 versus 3; P < 0·001). Conclusion Her2 positivity was associated with increased rates of axillary pCR and reduced nodal burden following NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M R Boland
- Department of Breast Surgery St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
| | - T P McVeigh
- Department of Breast Surgery University College Hospital Galway Galway Ireland
| | - N O'Flaherty
- Department of Breast Surgery University College Hospital Galway Galway Ireland
| | - G Gullo
- Department of Oncology St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
| | - M Keane
- Department of Oncology University College Hospital Galway Galway Ireland
| | - C M Quinn
- Department of Pathology St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
| | - E W McDermott
- Department of Breast Surgery St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
| | - A J Lowery
- Department of Breast Surgery University College Hospital Galway Galway Ireland
| | - M J Kerin
- Department of Breast Surgery University College Hospital Galway Galway Ireland
| | - R S Prichard
- Department of Breast Surgery St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Keegan NM, Milewski M, Kelly CM, Murphy V, Chao C, Walsh J, Kennedy MJ, O'Connor M, Murphy C, O'Reilly S, Keane M, Duffy K, Hennessy B, Morris PG. Abstract OT3-04-03: The impact of the 21 gene recurrence score (RS) on chemotherapy prescribing in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, lymph node positive early stage breast cancer in Ireland. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-ot3-04-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
For Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive, early stage breast cancer, the 21 gene Recurrence Score (RS) has clinical use both as a prognostic tool and to predict chemotherapy benefit. The availability of this tool in Ireland has led to a reduction in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for women with lymph node (LN) negative disease. However, the RS is not routinely funded for patients with LN positive (LN+) breast cancer in Ireland. In addition, there are limited international data on the use of this tool in the preoperative setting. In this prospective observational study, we are investigating whether access to the 21 gene RS leads to a reduction in the receipt of chemotherapy for patients with ER+, LN+ breast cancer, and to correlate the 21 gene RS with response to preoperative systemic therapy.
TRIAL DESIGN
This is a national, multi-site, prospective, observational study that will examine the impact of the 21 gene RS on chemotherapy recommendations in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. Prior to and following tumor testing with the 21 gene RS, Physicians will complete a questionnaire which details type and strength of systemic therapy recommendations.
ELIGIBILITY
Cohort 1 (postoperative) will include patients with ER+ tumors of any size with involvement of 1-3 lymph nodes (N1 including micrometastases). Cohort 2 (preoperative) will include patients with ER+, T2-T4 tumors with biopsy proven nodal metastases. Both cohorts will have ECOG PS 0 or 1 and be fit for consideration of chemotherapy as determined by the Investigator.
SPECIFIC AIMS
The primary endpoint is the percentage reduction in the number of patients for whom treating physicians recommend chemotherapy after testing with 21 gene RS. Secondary endpoints include the correlation between the 21 gene RS and residual cancer burden score, as well as pathological, clinical and radiological response rates. The economic impact of the 21 gene RS in ER+, LN+ will also be assessed.
STATISTICAL METHODS
The sample size is based on similar decision impact studies conducted in other countries. Physician recommendations for chemotherapy pre 21-gene RS and recommendations post 21-gene RS testing will be compared and percentage change estimated with 95% confidence intervals. For secondary endpoints, the Pearson correlation coefficient (rho) will be used to examine the strength of the correlation between the 21 gene RS category and response. A budget impact model will be used to estimate the cost reduction in adjuvant chemotherapy as a result of 21-gene RS testing.
PRESENT ACCRUAL AND TARGET ACCRUAL
Target accrual is 75 in each of the neoadjuvant and adjuvant cohorts to total 150 patients.
Supported by Genomic Health.
Citation Format: Keegan NM, Milewski M, Kelly CM, Murphy V, Chao C, Walsh J, Kennedy MJ, O'Connor M, Murphy C, O'Reilly S, Keane M, Duffy K, Hennessy B, Morris PG. The impact of the 21 gene recurrence score (RS) on chemotherapy prescribing in estrogen receptor (ER) positive, lymph node positive early stage breast cancer in Ireland [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-04-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NM Keegan
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Milewski
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - CM Kelly
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - V Murphy
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Chao
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Walsh
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - MJ Kennedy
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M O'Connor
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C Murphy
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - S O'Reilly
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - K Duffy
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - B Hennessy
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - PG Morris
- Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland; Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland; Cancer Trials Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland; Genomic Health, Ireland; St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland; University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland; Bon Secours, Cork, Ireland; Cork University Hospital, Ireland; University College Hospital Galway, Ireland; Letterkenny General Hospital, Ireland; AMNCH and St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Coleman R, Collinson M, Bell R, Marshall H, Dodwell D, Keane M, Gil M, Gregory W, Cameron D. Abstract P6-17-01: Adjuvant treatment with zoledronic acid (ZOL) in stage II/III breast cancer. The AZURE trial (BIG 01/04) 10 year follow-up. Cancer Res 2017. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs16-p6-17-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
This abstract was not presented at the symposium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Coleman
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - M Collinson
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - R Bell
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - H Marshall
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - D Dodwell
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - M Keane
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - M Gil
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - W Gregory
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| | - D Cameron
- University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom; University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; AZURE Investigators
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The study of simple solar energy storage models leads to the question of analyzing the equilibrium distribution of Markov chains (Harris chains), for which the state at epoch (n + 1) (i.e. the temperature of the storage tank) depends on the state at epoch n and on a controlled input, acceptance of which entails a further decrease of the temperature level. Here we study the model where the input is exponentially distributed. For all values of the parameters involved an explicit expression for the equilibrium distribution of the Markov chain is derived, and from this we calculate, as one of the possible applications, the exact values of the mean of this equilibrium distribution.
Collapse
|
15
|
Glynn S, Garrrido-Cuesta P, Wink D, Ridnour L, Ambs S, Keane M, Walsh E, Callagy G. Abstract P2-05-15: NOS2&COX2 activation of TLR4 & EGFR signalling causes poor outcome in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer via pro-survival signals and immune polarisation. Cancer Res 2016. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs15-p2-05-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We seek to further elucidate mechanisms by which inflammatory mediators promote estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer progression and poor survival. We previously reported association between inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS2) and poor outcome in ER-negative tumours. In tumours aberrant NOS2 induction facilitates tissue remodelling and stimulates neovascularisation. Also involved in inflammation and wound healing is cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2). We demonstrated that COX2 is associated with Akt activation and poor outcome in ER-negative tumours. We hypothesise that co-expression COX2 with NOS2 in ER-negative tumours amplifies effects of NOS2 on poor outcome, via EGFR and TLR4 signalling loop activation, and polarization of the tumour immune-compartment to pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype.
Methodology
We determined the association of NOS2 and COX2 co-expression on breast cancer specific survival in ER-negative and triple negative breast tumours (N=102), via immunohistochemistry and cox regression statistical analysis. To explore the mechanism of NOS2 induction of COX2 through transactivation of EGFR, NO donors in combination with EGFR inhibitors were used to determine if NO exposure results in amplified EGFR and PGE2 pro-survival and pro-metastatic signalling in triple negative breast cancer cell lines. Finally, we explored the ability of NO to modify the ability of triple negative breast cancer secretome to induce polarisation of macrophages to a pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype.
Results
Co-expression of NOS2 and COX2 in triple negative breast cancer results in poor outcome, via activation of pro-survival signalling and modification of the immune compartment to a pro-tumorigenic M2 associated phenotype. NO induces activation of growth factor signalling pathways and secretion of M2 promoting cytokines that induce THP1 macrophage polarization to an M2 phenotype.
Citation Format: Glynn S, Garrrido-Cuesta P, Wink D, Ridnour L, Ambs S, Keane M, Walsh E, Callagy G. NOS2&COX2 activation of TLR4 & EGFR signalling causes poor outcome in oestrogen receptor-negative breast cancer via pro-survival signals and immune polarisation. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-05-15.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Glynn
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - P Garrrido-Cuesta
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - D Wink
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - L Ridnour
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - S Ambs
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - E Walsh
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - G Callagy
- National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland; National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barrett D, More SJ, O'Neill R, Bradshaw B, Casey M, Keane M, McGrath G, Sammin D. Prevalence and distribution of exposure to Schmallenberg virus in Irish cattle during October 2012 to November 2013. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11:267. [PMID: 26486852 PMCID: PMC4618175 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-015-0564-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2015] [Accepted: 09/25/2015] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Schmallenberg virus (SBV) was first identified in November 2011. It is a novel Orthobunyavirus (family Bunyaviridae) whose main ill effect is congenital malformation of the musculoskeletal and central nervous systems. It is borne by Culicoides spp., and has spread extensively in western Europe. The first case of SBV in Ireland was diagnosed in October 2012. It was anticipated that once the virus emerged in Ireland that there would be wide scale or nationwide spread over the course of the 2013 vector season. The objectives of this study were to determine the seroprevalence and distribution of exposure to Schmallenberg virus in Irish cattle from November 2012 to November 2013. Methods Samples of brain for the pathology based surveillance were collected from malformed bovine and ovine foetuses submitted for post mortem examination. These samples were tested for SBV using RT-qPCR. Three serological surveys were carried out on sera submitted for the national brucellosis eradicartion programme. A spatial analysis of both sets of data was carried out. Results Between October 2012 and 10th May 2013, SBV was confirmed by RT-qPCR in brain tissues from malformed foetuses obtained from 49 cattle herds and 30 sheep flocks in Ireland. In national serosurveys conducted between November 2012 until November 2013 the herd-level and animal-level SBV seroprevalences in cattle were 53 and 36 % respectively for the first survey, 51 and 35 % for the second survey and 53 and 33 % for the third survey. The herd level seroprevalence in counties ranged from 0 to 100 %, with the counties in the south and southeast having the highest seroprevalence (>50 %), the midlands a moderate herd level seroprevalence (10–50 %) while northern and north western counties had a low herd level seroprevalence (0–10 %). There was close spatial agreement between the results of the two different targeted surveillance strategies. Conclusions At the end of the 2012 vector season, there was widespread exposure to SBV among herds in southern and south eastern Ireland. During 2013, there was little or no evidence of further outward spread, unlike the situation in several other European countries. Given the lack of evidence for circulation of the virus since 2012, it is likely that the younger age cohort in herds previously exposed to SBV and substantial proportions of animals of all ages on the margins of affected areas are immunologically naïve to SBV, and would be susceptible to infection if the virus were to re-emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Barrett
- Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Sligo Regional Veterinary Laboratory, Doonally, Sligo, Ireland.
| | - S J More
- Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - R O'Neill
- Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Central Veterinary Laboratory, Backweston Laboratory Complex, Celbridge, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| | - B Bradshaw
- Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Central Veterinary Laboratory, Backweston Laboratory Complex, Celbridge, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| | - M Casey
- Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Central Veterinary Laboratory, Backweston Laboratory Complex, Celbridge, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| | - M Keane
- Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Cork Blood Testing Laboratory, Model, Farm Road, Cork, Ireland.
| | - G McGrath
- Centre for Veterinary Epidemiology and Risk Analysis, UCD School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.
| | - D Sammin
- Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Central Veterinary Laboratory, Backweston Laboratory Complex, Celbridge, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sparano J, Gray R, Zujewski J, Makower D, Pritchard K, Albain K, Hayes D, Geyer C, Dees C, Perez E, Keane M, Vallejos C, Goggins T, Mayer I, Brufsky A, Toppmeyer D, Kaklamani V, Atkins J, Olson J, Sledge G. 5BA Prospective trial of endocrine therapy alone in patients with estrogen-receptor positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer: Results of the TAILORx low risk registry. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)31935-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
18
|
Gullo G, Kennedy J, Breathnach O, McCaffrey J, Keane M, Martin M, Gupta R, Leonard G, Calvert P, Donnellan P, Walshe J, Mc Dermott E, Cairney S, Bose R, Scott K, Hernando A, Parker I, Tryfonopoulos D, Moulton B, Crown J. 1964 Pilot study of bevacizumab (Bev) in combination with docetaxel (T) and cyclophosphamide (C) as adjuvant treatment (AdjRx) for patients (pts) with early stage (ES) HER-2 normal breast cancer (BrCa) ICORG 08-10. Eur J Cancer 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(16)30912-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
19
|
Smyth L, Watson G, Kelly C, Keane M, Kennedy M, O'Reilly S, O'Connor M, Verleger K, O'Reilly S, Walshe J. P253 Economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on early stage breast cancer in Ireland. Breast 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(15)70285-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
20
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Keratoconus is an ectatic (weakening) disease of the cornea, which is the clear surface at the front of the eye. Approximately 10% to 15% of patients diagnosed with keratoconus require corneal transplantation. This may be full-thickness (penetrating) or partial-thickness (lamellar). OBJECTIVES To compare visual outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus, and to compare additional outcomes relating to factors which may contribute to poor visual outcomes (e.g. astigmatism, graft rejection and failure). SEARCH METHODS We searched a number of electronic databases including CENTRAL, PubMed and EMBASE without using any date or language restrictions. We last searched the electronic databases on 31 October 2013. We also handsearched the proceedings of several international ophthalmic conferences. SELECTION CRITERIA We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of DALK and penetrating keratoplasty in the treatment of keratoconus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data (graft failure, rejection, achievement of functional vision) results were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous data (postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), keratometric astigmatism and spherical equivalent) results were expressed as mean differences (MDs) and 95% CIs. MAIN RESULTS We identified two completed studies, with a total of 111 participants (n = 30 and n = 81), both conducted in Iran, that met our inclusion criteria. Participants had moderate to severe keratoconus pre-operatively and were randomly allocated to receive either DALK or penetrating keratoplasty. Only one eye of each participant was treated as part of the trials. The smaller study had 12 month follow-up data for all participants. For the larger study, four DALK surgeries had to be abandoned due to technical failure and visual and refractive outcomes were not measured in these participants. Follow-up length for the remaining 77 participants ranged from 6.8 to 36.4 months, with all 77 followed for at least three months post-suture removal. Details of the randomisation procedure were unavailable for the smaller study and so sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine if the results from this study had affected the overall results of the review.Neither of the included studies reported a difference between groups on any of the measures of post-graft visual achievement, keratometric astigmatism or spherical equivalent. A single case of graft failure in a penetrating keratoplasty was reported. No postoperative graft failures were reported in the DALK group of either study.Instances of graft rejection were reported in both groups, in both studies. The majority of these cases were successfully treated with steroids. The data, which related to all cases in each study - given that the four cases that did not go ahead as planned had already technically failed without presence of rejection - showed that rejection was less likely to occur in DALK (odds ratio (OR): 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 0.81, GRADE rating: moderate).Results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that inclusion of the Razmju 2011 study did not bias the results with regards to rejection episodes. While sensitivity analysis showed altered results with regards to failure rates, the data available from the Javadi 2010 study alone had a very wide 95% CI, suggesting an imprecise estimate. Therefore, even after removal of the Razmju 2011 data, it is still difficult to draw conclusions regarding superiority of one technique over another with regards to graft failure.DALK was unable to be completed as planned in four cases and in a further three cases, complications during dissection required further intervention. Other adverse events, of varying severity, were reported in both intervention groups with similar frequency. For both types of surgery, these included postoperative astigmatism, steroid induced ocular hypertension and persistent epithelial defects. In recipients of DALK, one participant had interface neovascularisation (a proliferation of blood vessels where the host and donor cornea come together) and one had wrinkling of Descemet's membrane, the basement membrane separating the corneal stroma from the corneal endothelium. In the penetrating keratoplasty groups, one participant required graft resuturing and one had an atonic pupil, a condition in which the pupil dilates and is non-reactive.Overall, the quality of the evidence was rated as very low to moderate, with methodological limitations, incomplete data analysis and imprecision of findings, as well as high risk of bias in several areas for both studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS We found no evidence to support a difference in outcomes with regards to BCVA at three months post-graft or at any of the other time points analysed (GRADE rating: very low). We also found no evidence of a difference in outcomes with regards to graft survival, final UCVA or keratometric outcomes. We found some evidence that rejection is more likely to occur following penetrating keratoplasty than DALK (GRADE rating: moderate). The small number of studies included in the review and methodological issues relating to the two, mean that the overall quality of the evidence in this review is low. There is currently insufficient evidence to determine which technique may offer better overall outcomes - final visual acuity and time to attain this, keratometric stabilisation, risk of rejection or failure, or both, and risk of other adverse events - for patients with keratoconus. Large randomised trials comparing the outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty and DALK in the treatment of keratoconus are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Keane
- Flinders UniversityDepartment of OphthalmologyLevel 3 Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAdelaideAustraliaSA 5042
| | - Douglas Coster
- Flinders UniversityDepartment of OphthalmologyLevel 3 Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAdelaideAustraliaSA 5042
| | - Mohammed Ziaei
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust162 City RoadLondonUKEC1V 2PD
| | - Keryn Williams
- Flinders UniversityDepartment of OphthalmologyLevel 3 Flinders Medical CentreBedford ParkAdelaideAustraliaSA 5042
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Crown J, Coate L, Keane M, Kennedy J, O'Reilly S, Kelly C, O'Connor M, Martin M, Duffy K, Murphy C, Walshe J, O'Shea T, Moulton B, Egan K, O'Donovan N, Gullo G, Geraghty K, Hennessy B. Abstract P4-12-25: Randomized phase II study of pre-operative docetaxel, carboplatin with trastuzumab (TCH) and/or/lapatinib (L) in HER-2 positive (H+) breast cancer patients (BC pts). ICORG 10-05. Cancer Res 2013. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs13-p4-12-25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The addition of trastuzumab (H) to pre-operative chemotherapy in H+BC increases the rate of pathological complete remission (pCR). H causes cardiac toxicity, especially when given with anthracyclines (Anth). TCH is a widely used adjuvant regimen with decreased cardiac toxiciy. We reported that TCH produces pCR in 40% of non-randomised pts with H+BC. Lapatinib is an alternative HER2 antagonist, which produces responses following trastuzumab failure, and which has been reported to augment H activity in combination. We studied the non-Anth regimens TCH v TCL v TCHL in pts with H+BC. The primary objective of this study was pCR. Secondary endpoints were toxicity and translational.
Methods: Eligibility criteria included: primary BC, HER-2 +, node + disease (histologically or cytologically confirmed) or node-negative with >T1, normal left ventricle ejection fraction, no active/uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, normal organ and marrow function. Treatment consisted of 6 cycles of D (75mg/m2) + C (AUC 6) q3 weekly and H (8 mg/kg on cycle 1 day 1 and 6 mg/kg q3weekly thereafter for one year) ± L (1000mg OD) for up to 1 week before surgery. A sample size of 36 evaluable pts is required to detect an absolute 25% difference in the pCR rate between the hypothesised 65% pCR rate vs the historical-control pCR rate of 40%.
Results: Following presentation of NCIC MA31 we decided to suspend accrual on our TCL arm.78 female pts were accrued to TCH/TCHL in 11 ICORG sites between 12/2010- 06/2013. Of 40 patients accrued to TCHL, only 18 pts completed 6 cycles. 17pts came off study early due to toxicity, 3 pts after cycle 3, 2 pts after cycle 2, 12pts after cycle 1. (1 patient was also registered but never started). Of 38 pts accrued to the TCH arm,33 pts completed 6 cycles,2 pts completed 5 cycles and 2 pts w/d after cycle 1. 3 TCHL & 1 TCH pt still remain on Rx. 2 pts have not yet had surgery. 52 SAEs occurred on study, 49 involving hospital admission, & 3 of medical significance. The most frequent SAEs were diarrhoea (10), febrile neutropenia (4), nausea (4), neutropenic sepsis (3), dehydration (2), wound infection (2), vomiting (2) neutropenia (2) decreased haemoglobin (2), GI perforation (1). There was 1 fatality on the TCH arm due to Neutropenic sepsis and typhlitis. One TCHL pt suffered GI perforation at cycle 1. pCR rates were 48% (16/33) for the TCH arm and 44% (7/16) for the TCHL arm. Translational studies are underway.
Conclusions: TCH containing treatment produces a high rate of pCR. TCHL will not produce a statistically higher rate of pCR in this sample. The addition of lapatinib to TCH results in substantial GI toxicity. TCHL appears to be less tolerable than other active chemotherapy +H+L regimens such as that used in Neo-ALLTO. ICORG is currently leading an international study of paclitaxel+H +/- L in metastatic BC.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-12-25.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Crown
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - L Coate
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - J Kennedy
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - S O'Reilly
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - C Kelly
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - M O'Connor
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - M Martin
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - K Duffy
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - C Murphy
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - J Walshe
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - T O'Shea
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - B Moulton
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - K Egan
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - N O'Donovan
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - G Gullo
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - K Geraghty
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - B Hennessy
- All-Ireland Co-Operative Oncology Research Group, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Casey R, Bell M, Keane M, Smyth A. An unusual presentation of MEN2A. BMJ Case Rep 2013; 2013:bcr-2012-007171. [PMID: 23749818 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
A 35-year-old woman presented with non-specific symptoms of fatigue and weight loss. Radiological investigations diagnosed a metastatic process and large bilateral adrenal masses. Histology from a liver biopsy and skin biopsy confirmed a diagnosis of metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. Further biochemical investigations revealed a positive 24-h urinary metanephrine collection and evidence of primary hyperparathyroidism. Genetic testing confirmed a mutant RET oncogene, confirming our clinical suspicion of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2A) syndrome. The patient had no family history of endocrine disease and presented with widespread metastatic disease, making this an unusual presentation of MEN2A syndrome. Furthermore cutaneous metastases are rarely encountered in conjunction with metastatic medullary thyroid cancer. This case draws attention to the importance of genetic counselling in first-degree relatives of patients with confirmed MEN2A. This allows for timely diagnosis and reduced morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Casey
- Department of Medicine, University Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Keane M, Williams K, Coster D. Penetrating keratoplasty versus deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for treating keratoconus. THE COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2012. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
24
|
Gullo G, Kennedy J, Breathnach O, McCaffrey J, Keane M, Martín M, Gupta R, Leonard G, Tryfonopoulos D, O'Shea T, Crown J. P2-18-04: Pilot Evaluation of Bevacizumab (Bev) in Combination with Docetaxel (T) and Cyclophosphamide (C) as Adjuvant Treatment (AdjRx) for Patients (pts) with Early Stage (ES) Breast Cancer (BrCa). Cancer Res 2011. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs11-p2-18-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The combination of Bev + chemotherapy (CRx) has been shown to produce superior response rates and progression free survival compared to CRx alone, providing a rationale for the study of Bev with AdjCRx for pts with ESBrCa. As Bev can cause hypertension (HTN) and may increase the risk of cardiac failure, there is a rationale for studying a standard non-anthracycline (Anth) AdjCRx with Bev, e.g. TC (docetaxel-cyclophosphamide). We performed a pilot phase II study to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of TC+Bev in pts with ESBrCa in preparation for participation in a random assignment trial. We have previously reported preliminary toxicity data.
Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ESBrCa which was HER-2 normal, node+ or, N- and primary tumour (T) >2 cm and receptor negative, or T >3 cm, normal left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF), no active/uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, normal organ and marrow function. Treatment consisted of four 3-weekly cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 together with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Patients commenced Bev 15 mg/kg i.v. on day 1, and then every 3 weeks to a total of 18 cycles of treatments. Pts were monitored clinically, with echocardiograms and with serial estimations of BNP and troponin.
Results: A total of 106 female pts were accrued in 9 ICORG sites between 11/2008 and 7/2010. Ages ranged from 25–75 (median 52). On 20/06/2011, 105 pts have completed study Rx, 1 will finish 7/2011. A total of 36 serious adverse events (SAEs) have been reported so far, 33 involving hospital admission, 3 serious for other reasons. In 25 (24%) pts study Rx was discontinued due to: HTN-9, intestinal perforation-2, consent withdrawl-7, infection-2, proteinuria-1, anaphylaxis-1, cancer relapse-1, arthralgia-1, anal fistula-1. The two perforations occurred at cycles 1 and 16 of Bev respectively. Neither pt with perforation had history of prior abdominal surgery. The median number of cycles achieved by the discontinued pts was 9. HTN of any grade occurred in 49 out of 103 (48%) pts who had no HTN at baseline (BL) and 42 of them required Rx. Among pts who experienced HTN on study Rx and completed Bev, 34 (81%) were still on anti-hypertensive 4 weeks after last infusion of Bev. Forty-one (39%) pts had LVEF drop >10% from BL during study Rx. In 8 (7.5%) pts LVEF declined below 50%, 6 are documented to have recovered to normal, 2 had no further LVEF measurements (1 declined, 1 unknown reason). No episodes of CCF were reported. Troponin and BNP levels were normal in all 57 pts with serial measurements. Fourteen pts required treatment for neutropenia-related infection or for abscess/fistula.
Conclusions: In this study Bev overall toxicity in ESBC pts was similar to that reported for pts with MBC, and Bev discontinuation due to toxicity was relatively frequent. Although no pt developed CCF 7.5% of decline in LVEF<50% was observed. Intestinal perforation can occur in ESBC pts in absence of prior intestinal surgery and in the post-CRx phase of Bev. Pts receiving Bev with non-Anth AdjCRx require careful monitoring for toxicity.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2011;71(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-18-04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gullo
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Kennedy
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - O Breathnach
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J McCaffrey
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Martín
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R Gupta
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Leonard
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - T O'Shea
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J Crown
- 1Irish Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Price T, Peeters M, Strickland A, Ciuleanu T, Scheithauer W, O'Reilly S, Keane M, Spigel D, Tian Y, Kartik K. 6132 POSTER Efficacy of Panitumumab Plus FOLFIRI Versus FOLFIRI Alone in Patients With Wild-Type (WT) KRas Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) Treated With Prior Oxaliplatin or Bevacizumab Regimens: Results From 20050181. Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71777-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
26
|
Bell R, Marshall H, Collinson M, Cameron D, Dodwell D, Keane M, Gil M, Davies C, Coleman R. 5155 POSTER Reduction in Fractures Following Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid in Stage ll/lll Breast Cancer – the AZURE Trial (BIG 01/04). Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71597-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
27
|
Coleman R, Marshall H, Gregory W, Bell R, Dodwell D, Keane M, Gil M, Davies C, Cameron D. 5019 POSTER DISCUSSION Discordant Treatment Effects According to Menopausal Status Following Adjuvant Zoledronic Acid in Stage ll/lll Breast Cancer -The AZURE Trial (BIG 01/04). Eur J Cancer 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(11)71461-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
28
|
Matti AI, Chu ER, Keane M, Pesudovs K, Chen CS. Comparison of Ishihara and Hardy-Rand-Rittler Pseudoisochromatic Plates in Non-Arteritic Anterior Ischaemic Optic Neuropathy. Neuroophthalmology 2011. [DOI: 10.3109/01658107.2011.594143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
29
|
|
30
|
Coleman R, Woodward E, Brown J, Cameron D, Bell R, Dodwell D, Keane M, Gil M, Davies C, Burkinshaw R, Houston SJ, Grieve RJ, Barrett-Lee PJ, Thorpe H. Safety of zoledronic acid and incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) during adjuvant therapy in a randomised phase III trial (AZURE: BIG 01–04) for women with stage II/III breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 127:429-38. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1429-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2010] [Accepted: 02/25/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
31
|
Crown JP, Gullo G, Tryfonopoulos D, Keane M, Breathnach O, McCaffrey J, Martin MJ, Gupta R, Leonard G, Fennelly D, Kennedy JM. Abstract P5-10-17: Bevacizumab (Bev) in Combination with Docetaxel (T) and Cyclophosphamide (C) as Adjuvant Treatment (AdjRx) for Patients (pts) with Early Stage (ES) Breast Cancer (BrCa) and Normal HER-2 Status. A Pilot Evaluation. Cancer Res 2010. [DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs10-p5-10-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
In random assignment trials, the combination of Bev+ chemotherapy has been shown to produce superior response rates and progression free survival compared to chemotherapy alone, providing a rationale for the study of Bev in the AdjRx of pts with ESBrCa. As a principal side effect of Bev is hypertension (HTN), anthracycline-containing (Anth) AdjRx may pose additional cardiovascular risks. The role of Anth in Her2 normal ESBC is uncertain. TC is a standard non-Anth AdjRx. We performed a single arm pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of TC+Bev in pts with ESBC in preparation for participation in a random assignment trial. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ESBC which was HER-2 normal, node-positive or >2 cm and receptor negative, or >3 cm and receptor positive, normal cardiac ejection fraction (EF), no active or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, normal organ and marrow function. Treatment consisted of four 3 weekly cycles of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 together with cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. Patients commenced bevacizumab 15 mg/kg i.v. on day 1, and q 3 weeks to a total of 19 treatments. Pts were monitored clinically, with echocardiograms and with serial estimations of BNP and troponin.
Results: A total of 105 female pts were accrued in 9 ICORG sites between Dec 2008 and June 2010. Ages ranged from 26-86 (median 55). At June 2010, 33 have completed all phases of therapy, 54 are still on treatment. Eighteen pts have been removed from study due to: HTN -7, intestinal perforation -2, withdrew consent-4, proteinuia-1, anaphylaxis-1, infection-3. The perforations occurred at cycles 9 and 19. Neither pt. with perforation had prior abdominal surgery. The median number of cycles achieved by the discontinued pts was 9. HTN requiring Rx occurred in 25 pts. Among 12 with HTN who have completed Bev, 2 are off HTN meds, and 9 are on reducing doses. The median EF at base line was 67%, at 13 cycles (42 pts) 63%, 18 cycles (27 pts) 66%. Six pts had EF drop >10%, in 3 of these EF fell below 50% as last recorded value. There were no episodes of clinical cardiac failure. Troponin and BNP levels were normal in all 57 pts with serial measurements. Thirteen pts required treatment for neutropenia-related infection or for abscess.
Conclusions: The spectrum and frequency of bevacizumab toxicity in our population of healthy adjuvant pts is similar to that reported for pts with metastatic BC and other malignancies. Hypertension is the principal cause of treatment discontinuation, but cardiac toxicity appears to be limited, with this non-anth chemotherapy +Bev. Intestinal perforation can also occur in pts with ESBC. These toxicities can occur in the post chemotherapy phase of Bev therapy. Pts enrolled on random assignment trials of Bev containing AdjRx require careful monitoring for toxicity.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-10-17.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JP Crown
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Gullo
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Tryfonopoulos
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M Keane
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - O Breathnach
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J McCaffrey
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - MJ Martin
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - R Gupta
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - G Leonard
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - D Fennelly
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - JM. Kennedy
- The All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mahalingam D, Keane M, Pirianov G, Mehmet H, Samali A, Szegezdi E. Differential activation of JNK1 isoforms by TRAIL receptors modulate apoptosis of colon cancer cell lines. Br J Cancer 2009; 100:1415-24. [PMID: 19352384 PMCID: PMC2694422 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis on binding to its receptors, death receptor 4 and 5 (DR4, DR5). TRAIL can also activate c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) through the adaptor molecules, TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2) and receptor-interacting protein (RIP). The role of JNK in TRAIL-induced tumour cell apoptosis is unclear. In this study, we demonstrate that JNK is activated by TRAIL in colon cancer cells. Inhibition of JNK with L-JNKI reduced rhTRAIL-induced cell death but enhanced cell death induced by selective activation of DR4 or DR5. This difference was unrelated to receptor internalisation or differential activation of c-Jun, but activation of different JNK isoforms. Our data demonstrate that JNK1, but not JNK2 is activated by rhTRAIL in the examined colon cancer cell lines. Although rhTRAIL activated both the long and short isoforms of JNK1, selective activation of DR4 or DR5 led to predominant activation of the short JNK1 isoforms (JNK1α1 and/or JNK1β1). Knockdown of JNK1α1 by shRNA enhanced apoptosis induced by TRAIL, agonistic DR4 or DR5 antibodies. On the other hand, knockdown of the long JNK1 isoforms (JNK1α2 and JNK1β2) had the opposite effect; it reduced TRAIL-induced cell death. These data indicate that the short JNK1 isoforms transmit an antiapoptotic signal, whereas the long isoforms (JNK1α2 or JNK1β2) act in a proapoptotic manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Mahalingam
- Cell Stress and Apoptosis Research Group, Department of Biochemistry and National Centre of Biomedical Engineering Science, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, Ireland
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Barry A, O’Cearbhaill R, Griffin D, Donnellan P, Keane M, Grimes H. Evaluation of carboplatin dosage based on 4-variable modification of diet in renal disease equation. Ir J Med Sci 2008; 178:301-7. [DOI: 10.1007/s11845-008-0250-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2008] [Accepted: 10/06/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
34
|
Jawad MF, Noonan AM, Watson E, Avalos G, Keane M, Connolly CE. A study to determine whether the subclassification of DLBCL (using immunohistochemical (IHC) markers with tissue microarray (TMA)) is better than international prognostic index (IPI) to predict prognosis and survival. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.22153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
35
|
O’Cearbhaill R, Barry A, Griffin D, Keane M, Donnellan P, Grimes H. Evaluation of carboplatin dosage based on a body surface area adjusted 4-variable modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.13524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
36
|
McKeown D, Waldron-Lynch MG, Keane M. Stage and grade of colorectal cancer at presentation in the West of Ireland. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.15095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
37
|
Waldron-Lynch MG, McKeown D, Keane M. Correlation of menopausal status and age with outcome in breast cancer patients in the West of Ireland. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.22186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
38
|
McIntyre E, Eckermann SL, Keane M, Magarey A, Roeger L. Publishing in peer review journals--criteria for success. Aust Fam Physician 2007; 36:561-2. [PMID: 17619676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
Peer review papers contribute to the body of knowledge that forms the evidence on which best practice is based. Publishing facilitates knowledge sharing, thereby enabling individuals and organisations to contribute to the body of evidence on best practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen McIntyre
- Primary Health Care Research and Information Service, Department of General Practice, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Harrison J, Chen JQ, Miller W, Chen W, Hnizdo E, Lu J, Chisholm W, Keane M, Gao P, Wallace W. Risk of silicosis in cohorts of Chinese tin and tungsten miners and pottery workers (II): Workplace-specific silica particle surface composition. Am J Ind Med 2005; 48:10-5. [PMID: 15940714 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is hypothesized that surface occlusion by alumino-silicate affects the toxic activity of silica particles in respirable dust. In conjunction with an epidemiological investigation of silicosis disease risk in Chinese tin and tungsten mine and pottery workplaces, we analyzed respirable silica dusts using a multiple-voltage scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (MVSEM-EDS). METHODS Forty-seven samples of respirable sized dust were collected on filters from 13 worksites and were analyzed by MVSEM-EDS using high (20 keV) and low (5 keV) electron beam accelerating voltages. Changes in the silicon-to-aluminum X-ray line intensity ratio between the two voltages are compared particle-by-particle with the 90th percentile value of the same measurements for a ground glass homogeneous control sample. This provides an index that distinguishes a silica particle that is homogeneously aluminum-contaminated from a clay-coated silica particle. RESULTS The average sample percentages of respirable-sized silica particles alumino-silicate occlusion were: 45% for potteries, 18% for tin mines, and 13% for tungsten mines. The difference between the pottery and the metal mine worksites accounted for one third of an overall chi-square statistic for differences in change in measured silicon fraction between the samples. CONCLUSION The companion epidemiological study found lower silicosis risk per unit cumulative respirable silica dust exposure for pottery workers compared to metal miners. Using these surface analysis results resolves differences in risk when exposure is normalized to cumulative respirable surface-available silica dust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Harrison
- Health Effects Laboratory Division, US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Klein P, Glaser E, Grogan L, Keane M, Lipkowitz S, Soballe P, Brooks L, Jenkins J, Steinberg SM, DeMarini DM, Kirsch I. Biomarker assays in nipple aspirate fluid. Breast J 2001; 7:378-87. [PMID: 11843848 DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4741.2001.07601.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The noninvasive technique of nipple aspiration as a potential source of biomarkers of breast cancer risk was evaluated. The feasibility of performing mutagenesis assays, amplifying DNA, and performing protein electrophoresis on nipple aspirate fluid was explored. A tool was developed to measure the level of discomfort, if any, from this procedure. Twenty-five healthy women (20 premenopausal and 5 postmenopausal) were enrolled. Fluid was obtained using a modified breast pump. Premenopausal women were scheduled for four to six weekly aspirations, and postmenopausal women were scheduled for one to two weekly aspirations. Mutagenesis assays were performed using the Salmonella (Ames) assay. DNA amplification of several microsatellite regions was carried out using polymerase chain reaction. Protein was quantified, and two-dimensional protein electrophoresis was performed. Overall, fluid was obtained from 80% of the women, and the level of discomfort was minimal. Acid hydrolysis of one sample resulted in mutagenicity; all six nonhydrolyzed samples were not mutagenic. The ability to amplify DNA ranged from 34% to 96%, depending on length of the microsatellite region examined. The average protein concentration was 71 microg/mL. Two-dimensional protein electrophoresis was successfully performed on samples from two subjects. Nipple aspiration is a simple technique and is easily learned and well tolerated, which yields a reagent useful for a variety of investigations. This technique may facilitate the identification and application of biomarkers for future breast cancer risk assessment and chemopreventive protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Klein
- Genetics Branch, CCR National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Coakley R, O’Neill S, Coakley R, Glynn P, O’Neill S, Finlay GA, Russell KJ, McMahon K, D’Arcy EM, Masterson JB, Fitzgerald MX, O’Connor CM, O’Driscoll LR, Finlay GA, Fitzgerald MX, O’Connor CM, McGarvey LPA, Forsythe P, Heaney LG, MacMahon J, Ennis M, Leonard C, Tormey V, Burke CM, Poulter LW, Keatings VM, FitzGerald MX, Barnes PJ, Harty HR, Corfield DR, Adams L, Schwartzstein RM, Kiely JF, Buckley A, Shiels P, Deegan PC, Maurer B, McNicholas WT, Dunlop KA, Martin B, Riley M, Shields MD, Glynn P, Kilgallen I, Coakley R, O’Neill S, McElvaney NG, Cervantes-Laurean D, Wehr N, Gabriele K, Robinson W, Moss J, Levine RL, Urbach V, Walsh D, Harvey B, McElroy MC, Pittet JF, Allen L, Wiener-Kroonish J, Dobbs LG, O’Donnell DM, McMahon KJ, O’Connor C, Fitzgerald MX, McGuirk P, Mahon B, Griffin F, Mills KHG, Murphy R, Brijker F, Mulloy E, Cohen Tervaert JW, Walshe J, O’Neill S, McGarvey LPA, Heaney LG, Lowry RC, Shepherd DRT, MacMahon J, Gamble LA, Carton C, Memon R, Winter D, Chan A, Aherne T, O’Reilly P, Harbison JA, McNicholas WT, O’Callaghan S, Mulloy E, Keane M, McKenna M, Woods S, O’Neill S, Lamon A, Leonard C, Faul J, Murphy M, Burke CM, Tormey V, Riley M, Porszasz J, Engelen MPKJ, Brundage B, Wasserman K, Sweeney M, O’Regan RG, McLoughlin P, Sweeney M, Honner V, Sinnott B, O’Regan RG, McLoughlin P, Kilgallen I, O’Neill S, McGrath DS, Kiely J, Cryan B, Bredin CP, McGrath DS, Shortt C, Stack M, Kelleher N, Bredin CP, Russell KJ, McRedmond J, Mulkerji N, Keatings V, Fitzgerald MX, O’Connor CM, Boylan GM, McElroy MC, Dobbs LG, Forsythe P, McGarvey LPA, Cross LJM, Ennis M, Heaney LG, MacMahon J, Davern S, O’Connor CM, McDonnell TJ, Kiely JL, Lawless G, Cunningham S, McNicholas WT, Lordan J, Clancy L, Manning P, Plunkett P, Donaghy D, Kiely J, McDonnell TJ, Ben Musbah F, Loftus BG, Ben Musbah F, Loftus BG, Rutherford R, Watson SNE, Gilmartin JJ, Henry M, Mullins G, Brennan N, Kiely JL, Deegan PC, McNicholas WT. Irish thoracic society. Ir J Med Sci 1998. [DOI: 10.1007/bf02937212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
42
|
Simiand J, Keane M, Keane PE, Soubrié P. SR 141716, a CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, selectively reduces sweet food intake in marmoset. Behav Pharmacol 1998; 9:179-81. [PMID: 10065938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
SR 141716 (1 and 3 mg/kg p.o.), a selective central (CB1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist, selectively reduced feeding of a very highly palatable cane-sugar mixture in marmosets. In contrast, standard primate pellet intake was not modified at the lower dose, but was slightly increased (+29%;p < 0.01) by the higher dose of SR 141716. These results are in agreement with the hypothesis that endogenous cannabinoid systems are involved in the modulation of the appetitive value of food.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To find out to what extent nurses were perceived to be participating in audit, to identify factors thought to impede their involvement, and to assess progress towards multidisciplinary audit. RESEARCH DESIGN Qualitative. METHODS Focus groups and interviews. PARTICIPANTS Chairs of audit groups and audit support staff in hospital, community and primary health care and audit leads in health authorities in the North West Region. RESULTS In total 99 audit leads/support staff in the region participated representing 89% of the primary health care audit groups, 80% of acute hospitals, 73% of community health services, and 59% of purchasers. Many audit groups remain medically dominated despite recent changes to their structure and organisation. The quality of interprofessional relations, the leadership style of the audit chair, and nurses' level of seniority, audit knowledge, and experience influenced whether groups reflected a multidisciplinary, rather than a doctor centred approach. Nurses were perceived to be enthusiastic supporters of audit, although their active participation in the process was considered substantially less than for doctors in acute and community health services. Practice nurses were increasingly being seen as the local audit enthusiasts in primary health care. Reported obstacles to nurses' participation in audit included hierarchical nurse and doctor relationships, lack of commitment from senior doctors and managers, poor organisational links between departments of quality and audit, work load pressures and lack of protected time, availability of practical support, and lack of knowledge and skills. Progress towards multidisciplinary audit was highly variable. The undisciplinary approach to audit was still common, particularly in acute services. Multidisciplinary audit was more successfully established in areas already predisposed towards teamworking or where nurses had high involvement in decision making. Audit support staff were viewed as having a key role in helping teams to adopt a collaborative approach to audit. CONCLUSION Although nurses were undertaking audit, and some were leading developments in their settings, a range of structural and organisational, interprofessional and intraprofessional factors was still impeding progress. If the ultimate goal of audit is to improve patient care, the obstacles that make it difficult for nurses to contribute actively to the process must be acknowledged and considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F M Cheater
- Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre, University of Leicester, UK. ..uk
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Keane M. Decreased Left Ventricular Relative Wall Thickness Predicts Decreased Event-Free Survival in African Americans With Dilated Cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)84211-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
45
|
Keane M. Comparison of electronic finger tapping test to Reitan's Finger Tapping Test in an adult population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6177(98)90523-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
46
|
Keane M, Ray M, Leark R. Comparison of electronic finger tapping test to Reitan's Finger Tapping Test in an adult population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998. [DOI: 10.1093/arclin/13.1.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
47
|
Hooghiemstra G, Keane M. A central limit theorem for sums of correlated products. STAT NEERL 1997. [DOI: 10.1111/1467-9574.00035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
48
|
|
49
|
Feeney T, O’Muire O, Gilmartin JJ, Manning P, Sinclair H, Clancy L, O’Connell F, Springall DR, Polak JM, Thomas VE, Fuller RW, Pride NB, Lyons RA, Leonard C, Faul J, Tormey VJ, Poulter LW, Burke CM, Pathmakanthan S, Barry MC, Wang JH, Kelly CJ, Burke PE, Sheehan SJ, Redmond HP, Bouchier-Hayes D, Abdih H, Watson RWG, Burke P, Egan JJ, Barber L, Lomax J, Fox A, Craske J, Yonan N, Rahman AN, Deiraniya AK, Carroll KB, Turner A, Woodcock AA, McNeill K, Bookless B, Gould K, Corris P, Higgenbottam T, Webb A, Woodcock A, McManus K, Miller D, Allen M, Ilstrup D, Deschamps C, Trastek V, Pairolero P, Cotter TP, Vaughan C, Kealy WP, Duggan PF, Curtain A, Bredin CP, Waite A, Maguire CP, Ryan J, O’Neill D, Coakley D, Walsh JB, Kilgallen I, O’Neill S, Ryan M, O’Connor CM, McDonnell T, Lowry RC, Buick JB, Magee TRA, O’Riordan D, Hayes J, O’Connor C, FitzGerald MX, Cosgrave C, Costello C, Deegan PC, McNicholas WT, Nugent AM, Lyons J, Gleadhill I, MacMahon J, Stevenson EC, Heaney LG, Shields MD, Cadden IS, Taylor R, Ennis M, Kharitonov SA, O’Connor J, Owens WA, O’Kane H, Cleland J, Gladstone DJ, Sarsam M, Graham ANJ, Anikin V, McGuigan JA, Curry RC, Varghese G, Keelan P, Rutherford R, O’Keeffe D, McCarthy P, Gilmartin JJ, Moore H, Balbernie E, Gilmartin JJ, Coakley R, Keane M, Costello R, Byrne P, McKeogh D, McLoughlin P, Finlay G, Concannon D, McKeown D, Kelly P, Tanner WA, Bouchier-Hayes DJ, Arumugasamy M, Yacoub K, O’Leary G, Stokes K, Geraghty J, Osborne H, O’Dwyer R, Gilliland R, Saleem SM, Aherne T, Power CK, Burke CH, Byrne A, Murphy JFA, Sharkey R, Mulloy E, Sharkey K, Long M, Birchall MA, Moorat A, Henderson J, Jacques L, Cahill P, Condron C, Royston D, Murphy J, Neill SO. Irish Thoracic Society. Ir J Med Sci 1995. [DOI: 10.1007/bf02973289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
50
|
|