Detailed analysis of retinal morphology in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) randomized to ranibizumab or triamcinolone treatment

Classification of diabetic maculopathy based on optical coherence tomography images using a Vision Transformer model

PURPOSE

To develop a Vision Transformer model to detect different stages of diabetic maculopathy (DM) based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

METHODS

After removing images with poor quality, a total of 3319 OCT images were extracted from the Eye Center of the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University and randomly split the images into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. All macular cross-sectional scan OCT images were collected retrospectively from the eyes of DM patients from 2016 to 2022. One of the OCT stages of DM, including early diabetic macular oedema (DME), advanced DME, severe DME and atrophic maculopathy, was labelled on the collected images, respectively. A deep learning (DL) model based on Vision Transformer was trained to detect four OCT grading of DM.

RESULTS

The model proposed in our paper can provide an impressive detection performance. We achieved an accuracy of 82.00%, an F1 score of 83.11%, an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.96. The AUC for the detection of four OCT grading (ie, early DME, advanced DME, severe DME and atrophic maculopathy) was 0.96, 0.95, 0.87 and 0.98, respectively, with an accuracy of 90.87%, 89.96%, 94.42% and 95.13%, respectively, a precision of 88.46%, 80.31%, 89.42% and 87.74%, respectively, a sensitivity of 87.03%, 88.18%, 63.39% and 89.42%, respectively, a specificity of 93.02%, 90.72%, 98.40% and 96.66%, respectively and an F1 score of 87.74%, 84.06%, 88.18% and 88.57%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our DL model based on Vision Transformer demonstrated a relatively high accuracy in the detection of OCT grading of DM, which can help with patients in a preliminary screening to identify groups with serious conditions. These patients need a further test for an accurate diagnosis, and a timely treatment to obtain a good visual prognosis. These results emphasised the potential of artificial intelligence in assisting clinicians in developing therapeutic strategies with DM in the future.

Study on BCVA, CMT, CME, Curative Effect, and Prognostic Value of DR Sufferers Based on Surgical Therapy Combined with VEGF Therapy at Different Times

In order to explore the efficacy and prognostic value of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular retinal thickness (CMT), and cystoid macular edema (CME) in diabetic retinopathy (DR) sufferers based on surgical therapy combined with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy at different times, a total of 170 cases of DR sufferers who visited our hospital from March 2019 to March 2021 are analyzed. All patients are randomly divided into control group and study group, with 85 cases and 85 eyes in each group. In addition, the contrast set received 2 therapies for 1.5 months/time, and the study set received 3 therapies for 1 month/time. The experimental results show that the BCVA of the two sets is notoriously enhanced. Besides, CMT and CME in the study set decrease more than those in the contrast set, and the blood vessel density of retinal capillaries in the contrast set and the examination set is notoriously enhanced. For DR sufferers, 1 month/time of anti-VEGF therapy can effectively enhance the sufferers’ visual acuity, CMT and CME. It is suggested that the clinical application of 1 month/time of anti-VEGF to DR sufferers can enhance the clinical therapeutic effect of sufferers and reduce the prognosis and recurrence.

The Role of Intravitreal Corticosteroids in the Treatment of DME: Predictive OCT Biomarkers

This work aims to summarize predictive biomarkers to guide treatment choice in DME. Intravitreal anti-VEGF is considered the gold standard treatment for centers involving DME, while intravitreal steroid treatment has been established as a second-line treatment in DME. However, more than 1/3 of the patients do not adequately respond to anti-VEGF treatment despite up to 4-weekly injections. Not surprisingly, insufficient response to anti-VEGF therapy has been linked to low-normal VEGF levels in the serum and aqueous humor. These patients may well benefit from an early switch to intravitreal steroid treatment. In these patients, morphological biomarkers visible in OCT may predict treatment response and guide treatment decisions. Namely, the presence of a large amount of retinal and choroidal hyperreflective foci, disruption of the outer retinal layers and other signs of chronicity such as intraretinal cysts extending into the outer retina and a lower choroidal vascular index are all signs suggestive of a favorable treatment response of steroids compared to anti-VEGF. This paper summarizes predictive biomarkers in DME in order to assist individual treatment decisions in DME. These markers will help to identify DME patients who may benefit from primary dexamethasone treatment or an early switch.

En face image-based classification of diabetic macular edema using swept source optical coherence tomography

This retrospective study was performed to classify diabetic macular edema (DME) based on the localization and area of the fluid and to investigate the relationship of the classification with visual acuity (VA). The fluid was visualized using en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) images constructed using swept-source OCT. A total of 128 eyes with DME were included. The retina was segmented into: Segment 1, mainly comprising the inner nuclear layer and outer plexiform layer, including Henle’s fiber layer; and Segment 2, mainly comprising the outer nuclear layer. DME was classified as: foveal cystoid space at Segment 1 and no fluid at Segment 2 (n = 24), parafoveal cystoid space at Segment 1 and no fluid at Segment 2 (n = 25), parafoveal cystoid space at Segment 1 and diffuse fluid at Segment 2 (n = 16), diffuse fluid at both segments (n = 37), and diffuse fluid at both segments with subretinal fluid (n = 26). Eyes with diffuse fluid at Segment 2 showed significantly poorer VA, higher ellipsoid zone disruption rates, and greater central subfield thickness than did those without fluid at Segment 2 (P < 0.001 for all). These results indicate the importance of the localization and area of the fluid for VA in DME.

Association Between First- and Third-Month Responses to Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose:

This work examines the relationship between first- and third-month anatomical and visual response with antivascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular edema.

Methods:

We prospectively evaluated 58 eyes with center-involved diabetic macular edema. Response was categorized upon the anatomical status after 3 monthly doses based on the reduction of central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline (≥20% or not). Correlation analysis between the anatomical response status, gained letters, optical coherence tomography morphological features, and other baseline characteristics were obtained.

Results:

Twenty-five eyes (43.1%) achieved an anatomical reduction of ≥20% at the third month. Those with a reduction of ≥20% of CMT had subretinal fluid ( P < .01), lower hemoglobin A1c values ( P < .01), lower proportion of intraretinal cysts ( P < .01), a greater anatomical reduction, and visual improvement at the first month of treatment. Multiple logistic regression analysis, showed that the change of CMT after the first injection was an independent predictor for the anatomical reduction of ≥20% after the loading phase ( P < .05). Best corrected visual acuity gain after the first dose showed a significant association with an improvement of ≥10 letters after the loading phase ( P < .05), but not for macular thickness reduction.

Conclusions:

First month anatomical reduction was associated with the anatomical response at 3 months ( P = .042) after monthly ranibizumab therapy. Visual improvement at the first month was predictive only for the visual outcome after the 3 monthly doses ( P = .032).

Keep an eye on adenosine: Its role in retinal inflammation

Adenosine is an endogenous purine nucleoside ubiquitously distributed throughout the body that interacts with G protein-coupled receptors, classified in four subtypes: A₁R, A_2AR, A_2BR and A₃R. Among the plethora of functions of adenosine, it has been increasingly recognized as a key mediator of the immune response. Neuroinflammation is a feature of chronic neurodegenerative diseases and contributes to the pathophysiology of several retinal degenerative diseases. Animal models of retinal diseases are helping to elucidate the regulatory roles of adenosine receptors in the development and progression of those diseases. Mounting evidence demonstrates that the adenosinergic system is altered in the retina during pathological conditions, compromising retinal physiology. This review focuses on the roles played by adenosine and the elements of the adenosinergic system (receptors, enzymes, transporters) in the neuroinflammatory processes occurring in the retina. An improved understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the signalling pathways mediated by adenosine underlying the onset and progression of retinal diseases will pave the way towards the identification of new therapeutic approaches.

The impact of ganglion cell layer cysts in diabetic macular oedema treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence and impact of ganglion cell layer cysts (GCLC) in patients with diabetic macular oedema (DME) under continuous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.

METHODS

The clinical findings and spectral domain optical coherence devices of baseline visits and follow-up after 12-24 and 36 months of DME patients under continuous anti-VEGF therapy were retrospectively collected and analysed for the impact of GCLC cysts. Previously established prognostic parameters were also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 110 eyes of 110 DME patients (mean age 64 ± 10 years) were included. At baseline, 17% eyes had GCLC. With GCLC, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvement was in mean 8.4 ± 2.4 Early-Treatment-Diabetic-Retinopathy-Study (ETDRS) letters less over the course of 36 months compared to the group lacking GCLC (p = 0.0009). Eyes with GCLC showed 68 ± 23.4 μm less central retinal thickness (CRT) decrease than eyes lacking GCLC (p < 0.0001). In the linear mixed effect models including external limiting membrane disruption, disintegration of inner retinal layer and epiretinal membrane, GCLC remained a statistical significant factor for the outcome parameter CRT, but missed statistical significance for BCVA.

CONCLUSION

Ganglion cell layer cysts (GCLC) seem to impact outcome in DME in patients receiving long-term treatment. This prognostic factor warrants further evaluation in the context of already well-established outcome parameters.

Analysis of anatomical biomarkers in subtypes of diabetic macular edema refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treated with dexamethasone implant

Introduction:

To analyze functional and anatomical outcomes in subtypes of diabetic macular edema treated with a single dexamethasone implant and to assess the usefulness of a pro-re-nata treatment among subtypes.

Methods:

Retrospective study in morphologic patterns of diabetic macular edema (diffuse retinal thickening n = 15; cystoid macular edema n = 38, and serous retinal detachment n = 17) recalcitrant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, treated with dexamethasone implant. Examinations included timing to recidive of diabetic macular edema, best-corrected visual acuity, and central subfield macular thickness at 2, 4, and 6 months.

Results:

In previously treated patients with a mean of 6.64 ± 3.69 anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections, the best-corrected visual acuity improved from 61.64 ± 13.71 to 65.71 ± 14.65 as per the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol (p = 0.009) and central subfield macular thickness change from 447.46 ± 110.82 to 354.39 ± 80.46 µm (p < 0.005). The best-corrected visual acuity improvement was better in the diffuse retinal thickening group (68.67 ± 13.81 vs 65.26 ± 14.04 in cystoid macular edema and vs 64.12 ± 17.06 in serous retinal detachment), whereas higher central subfield macular thickness thinning was observed in serous retinal detachment group (368.47 ± 29.96 to 310.27 ± 67.47 in diffuse retinal thickening, vs 445.92 ± 105.06 to 364.39 ± 80.28 and 520.59 ± 122.96 to 370.94 ± 81.73 in cystoid macular edema and serous retinal detachment, respectively). Cystoid macular edema group was the group with more recurrences after 6 months (86.8% vs 66.7% in diffuse retinal thickening and 70.6% in serous retinal detachment).

Conclusion:

Dexamethasone implant is effective for all persistent diabetic macular edema subtypes with sustained functional and morphologic gains in the first 6 months.

Intravitreal corticosteroid implant vs intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid implant and intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema (ME).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were comprehensively searched for studies comparing dexamethasone implant with ranibizumab in patients with ME. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST), and adverse events were extracted from the final eligible studies. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data, and the modified Jadad assessment tool was used to access the quality of outcomes.

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our analysis. The types of causes of ME include central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and diabetic retinopathy (DR). The ranibizumab treatment group had significantly better BCVA compared with the corticosteroid treatment group (standard mean difference [SMD] -0.80; 95% CI -1.08, -0.53; P<0.00001). The ranibizumab treatment group also had higher CST reduction compared with the corticosteroid treatment group, and there was a significant difference (weighted mean difference [WMD] 167.58; 95% CI 125.21-209.95; P<0.00001). There was no significant difference in serious adverse effects between the two groups (SMD 1.67; 95% CI 0.69, 4.05; P=0.26). However, the use of corticosteroid implant had a higher risk of intraocular pressure (IOP) (OR 6.88; 95% CI 4.53-10.44; P<0.00001) elevation and cataract (OR 3.98; 95% CI 1.89-8.37; P=0.0003) than ranibizumab treatment and fewer injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with ranibizumab, corticosteroid implant did not have greater improved BCVA, but corticosteroid implant had less CST reduction. The advantages of corticosteroids are fewer injections, while the advantages of ranibizumab include fewer side effects.