Simultaneous intravitreal dexamethasone and aflibercept for refractory macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion

Intravitreal Injection of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factors Combined with Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and corticosteroid combination therapy for the management of treatment-naïve or recurrent/refractory macular edema caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in comparison with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis study, the data from publications in the electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI and Scopus from January 1, 2007, through November 20, 2020, were compiled. Heterogeneity was statistically quantified by the I2 statistic, and meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-four related studies were identified, including a total of 1280 eyes, which consisted of 685 and 507 patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), respectively. This study demonstrated a greater improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the combination group compared to anti-VEGF monotherapy for both CRVO and BRVO cases at 6 months after initiating therapy. The improvement in vision was more notable in BRVO cases than in CRVO cases. However, the changes in central macular thickness (CMT) did not differ significantly between the different treatment approaches, and the results were inconclusive. Including all cases with RVO, there was no inferiority in terms of BCVA improvement and CMT reduction in the triamcinolone subgroup compared with the slow-release dexamethasone implant subgroup. A greater improvement was noticed in terms of BCVA in the sequentially treated subgroup compared to the simultaneous treatment subgroup, while there was a greater reduction in CMT in the simultaneous subgroup with the highest reduction recorded at 1 month after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that combination therapy with intravitreal anti-VEGF and corticosteroid (such as intravitreal or subtenon triamcinolone or dexamethasone implant) has a slightly better effect on improving BCVA in cases with BRVO or CRVO at 6 months compared to monotherapy.

Efficacy and effectiveness of anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy versus combination treatment for macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the main cause of retinal vascular blindness. Laser photocoagulation therapy is the regarded as the standard treatment for branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in the guidelines, but it is not effective for macular edema (ME) secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). As anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) or steroids monotherapy has been used to treat RVO, but each has its advantages and disadvantages. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraocular injection of anti-VEGF combined with steroids versus anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy for ME secondary to RVO.

METHODS

We systematically searched trials on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) for RCTs (random clinical trials) or non-RCTs, comparing anti-VEGF or steroids monotherapy to their combination. The primary outcomes were changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and intraocular pressure (IOP). The pooled data was analyzed by random effects model.

FINDINGS

A total of 10 studies selected from 366 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Our results favored anti-VEGF with steroids combination therapy in comparison with anti-VEGF {pooled SMD (standardized mean difference), 95% CI, -0.16 [-0.28, -0.04], P = 0.01} or steroids (pooled SMD, 95% CI, -0.56 [-0.73, -0.40], P < 0.00001) alone on changes of BCVA. Compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy group, the combination therapy also had a better effect {pooled MD (mean difference), 95% CI, -9.62 [-17.31, -1.93], P = 0.01)} at improvements on CMT. On the changes of IOP, assessment favored that combination therapy was associated with a better relief of IOP compared to steroids monotherapy group (pooled MD, 95% CI, -5.93 [-7.87, -3.99],P < 0.00001). What's more, the incidence of ocular hypertension was lower in the combined treatment group compared with control group treated with steroids alone (Odds Ratio, 95% CI, 0.21 [0.06, 0.77], P = 0.02). Results also showed that the combination group can prolong the average time to first anti-VEGF reinjection (MD, 95% CI, 1.74 [0.57, 2.90], P = 0.003) compared to control group treated with anti-VEGF alone.

CONCLUSION

Anti-VEGF with steroids combination treatment can enable a better achievement of improving BCVA, CMT, reducing the risk of increased IOP and improving patient prognosis compared to anti-VEGF or steroids therapy alone, lengthening the average time to anti-VEGF reinjection with reducing the injections during follow-up.

Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for the Treatment of Macular Edema and Uveitis: A Comprehensive Narrative Review

Purpose

The purpose of this review article is to provide a comprehensive review of the current applications of intravitreal DEX implant (Ozurdex^®, Allergan Inc, Irvine, CA) for a variety of ophthalmic conditions – ranging from FDA approved indications to off-label uses. We have attempted to provide relevant evidence from the literature to help a reader develop an understanding of the biological and pharmacokinetic properties of DEX implant, its uses, and potential side effects.

Methods

PubMed searches were performed using the terms “Ozurdex”, or “intravitreal DEX implant”, AND “retinal vein occlusion”, or “diabetic macular edema”, or “uveitis”. The search was performed in July of 2021, with an additional search in October 2021. All original English language articles were considered for this review.

Results

DEX implant has evidence of efficacy in a variety of clinical situations including macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion, diabetes, uveitis, and others. Safety concerns include cataract formation and progression, intraocular pressure elevation, complications related to intravitreal injection, and opportunistic infections secondary to steroid-induced immune suppression.

Conclusion

DEX implant is a useful tool in the management of several retinal disorders. Further studies are needed for head-to-head comparison with other treatment modalities and to determine its precise place in clinical practice.

Macular Edema and Visual Acuity Observation after Cataract Surgery in Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

Objective. The purpose was to explore the effect of cataract surgery on postoperative macular edema and visual acuity in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Methods. 88 patients with diabetic retinopathy treated in our hospital (December 2019–December 2020) were chosen as research subjects and divided into experimental group of 44 patients (52 eyes) and control group of 44 patients (54 eyes) according to the odd and even admission numbers. The control group received laser photocoagulation treatment, while the experimental group underwent cataract surgery. The central macular thickness (CMT) and visual acuity of the two groups after treatment were detected to evaluate the therapeutic effect of different treatment methods on diabetic retinopathy. Results. No obvious differences in sex ratio, average age, average course of disease, average weight, average BMI, average glycosylated hemoglobin, and residence were found between the two groups $\left(P>0.05\right)$ . The total clinical effective rate in the experimental group was obviously higher compared with the control group $\left(P<0.05\right)$ . The CMT at T1, T2, and T3 in the experimental group was obviously lower compared with the control group $\left(P<0.05\right)$ . The BCVA in the experimental group at 1 month and 3 months after treatment was obviously higher compared with the control group $\left(P<0.05\right)$ . The VEGF levels of both groups after treatment were obviously lower $\left(P<0.001\right)$ , and the VEGF level in the experimental group after treatment was obviously lower compared with the control group $\left(P<0.001\right)$ . The total incidence of complications in the experimental group was obviously lower compared with the control group $\left(P<0.05\right)$ . Conclusion. Cataract surgery is a reliable method to improve visual acuity and reduce serum inflammatory indicators in patients with diabetic retinopathy, with better clinical effect than laser photocoagulation, which is recommended for the treatment of diabetic retinopathy.

Add-On Effect of Simultaneous Intravitreal Dexamethasone to Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Patients with Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose: To report the effect of simultaneous dexamethasone and bevacizumab combination treatment in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods: Treatment-naive patients who had a macular edema secondary to BRVO with a duration of less than 1 month were treated either with intravitreal bevacizumab (Group-1) or intravitreal bevacizumab simultaneously combined with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Group-2). In both groups, patients received monthly bevacizumab injection during the first 3 months. Between months 3 and 12, all patients were allowed to receive pro-re-nata bevacizumab. In Group-2, the first dexamethasone implant injection was simultaneously received with first bevacizumab injections. The patients were evaluated for re-treatment after 6 months and 11 months for second and third dexamethasone simultaneously with intravitreal bevacizumab. Results: In Group-1, 35 eyes of 35 patients and in Group-2, 32 eyes of 32 patients were treated. The mean gains in BCVA were +10.7 letters in the Group-1 and +21.3 letters in the Group-2 (P = 0.021) at month 12. The mean reduction in Central Macular Thickness (CMT) from the baseline were -173.74 μm in the Group-1 and -257.97 μm in the Group-2 (P = 0.0018). In Group-1, the mean intravitreal bevacizumab injection number was 7.18 ± 1.05. In Group-2, the mean intravitreal bevacizumab and dexamethasone injection number was 5.15 ± 1.24. There was a significant difference in mean injection numbers between 2 groups (P = 0.044). Conclusion: In the early period of macular edema adding dexamethasone to bevacizumab therapy does improve visual acuity and CMT, and reduce the injection frequency more than bevacizumab alone.

Effect of Alternate Treatment with Intravitreal Corticosteroid and Anti-VEGF for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

To evaluate whether treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections alternately can improve treatment outcomes of macular edema (ME) caused by retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

This dual-center retrospective study included 112 eyes with treatment-naïve ME secondary to RVO that were alternately treated with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections (33 eyes, alternate group) or treated only with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (79 eyes, anti-VEGF group) on a pro re nata basis.

Results

During the 12-month follow-up period, the alternate group achieved a visual acuity gain of 0.39 logMAR, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a gain of 0.21 logMAR (P=0.042). The alternate group demonstrated a reduction in the central macular thickness of 229.9-μm, while the anti-VEGF group achieved a reduction of 220.1 μm (P=0.887). The alternate group required an average of 5.2 injections, while the anti-VEGF received 4.2 injections (P < 0.001). In a propensity score-matched cohort to compensate for the differences in the injection numbers between the two groups, the alternate group achieved a better visual acuity gain than the anti-VEGF group at month 12 (0.39 logMAR vs. 0.17 logMAR, P=0.048).

Conclusions

In ME secondary to RVO, treatment with intravitreal corticosteroid and anti-VEGF injections alternately resulted in a more favorable visual outcome compared with intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Aqueous humor inflammatory cytokine levels and choroidal thickness in patients with macular edema associated with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the association between subfoveal choroidal thickness (SCT) and the level of aqueous humor (AH) inflammatory cytokines in patients with macular edema (ME) associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

Twenty-eight eyes of 28 BRVO ME patients who underwent intravitreal injection treatment (ranibizumab, bevacizumab, or dexamethasone implant) were prospectively recruited. The concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A and inflammatory cytokines were measured from AH samples. We analyzed clinical factors associated with visual gain or the degree of central macular thickness (CMT) decrease and the association between SCT and inflammatory cytokine levels.

RESULTS

On multiple linear regression analysis, the AH interleukin (IL)-8 level was significantly associated with visual gain and CMT reduction at 6 months. Age, systemic hypertension, and AH monocyte chemo-attractant protein 1 level showed a significant association with baseline SCT, and VEGF-A showed a significant association with baseline SCT ratio (BRVO eye SCT/fellow eye SCT). Those with thick SCT showed a higher level of AH soluble VEGF receptors 2 and IL-8 and showed better visual gain and greater CMT reduction at 2 and 6 months compared to the thin SCT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of AH inflammatory cytokines was significantly associated with the ischemic status of the retina, treatment outcomes, and SCT in BRVO ME patients. Thick baseline SCT might be a predictive sign for better treatment outcomes in BRVO ME patients which are thought to be related to a higher level of intraocular inflammatory cytokines in these patients.

Macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in a real-life setting: a multicenter, nationwide, 3-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the presence of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO)-both central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)-3 years after diagnosis in patients who underwent intravitreal therapy and to identify potential prognostic factors and biomarkers of persistent macular edema.

METHODS

National multicenter, observational, exploratory, retrospective cohort study of 104 consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to RVO diagnosed from January 2014 to December 2015 with minimum 3-year follow-up time. Data analyzed included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), clinical and demographic data, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography parameters.

RESULTS

At final observation, median baseline central retinal thickness significantly improved from baseline 538 to 290 μm (p < 0.001) and complete macular edema resolution was achieved in 51.0% of patients (56.3% and 42.5% in BRVO and CRVO patients, respectively). BCVA also improved (p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed a relationship between recurrence of macular edema and disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) at baseline (odds ratio = 2.88; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Good long-term anatomical and functional outcomes are achieved with intravitreal treatments in RVO patients. Anatomical success and visual gains seen in the first year were maintained throughout the entire follow-up, though DRIL is a major risk factor for recurrence.

Use of Anti-VEGF Drugs in Retinal Vein Occlusions

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is one of the most prevalent causes of visual loss in the Western World. Its pathogenesis is still not completely known. Chronic macular edema and ischemia compromise the functional and anatomical status of the retina. Antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections have demonstrated better results than other previous options, including observation or laser therapy. This narrative review aims to analyze the current aspects related to these drugs.