Immunohistochemical assessment of Pax8 expression during pancreatic islet development and in human neuroendocrine tumors

GAD2 Is a Highly Specific Marker for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Pancreas

Glutamate decarboxylase 2 (GAD2) is the most important inhibitory neurotransmitter and plays a role in insulin-producing β cells of pancreatic islets. The limitation of GAD2 expression to a few normal cell types makes GAD2 a potential immunohistochemical diagnostic marker. To evaluate the diagnostic utility of GAD2 immunohistochemistry, a tissue microarray containing 19,202 samples from 152 different tumor entities and 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types was analyzed. In normal tissues, GAD2 staining was restricted to brain and pancreatic islet cells. GAD2 staining was seen in 20 (13.2%) of 152 tumor categories, including 5 (3.3%) tumor categories containing at least 1 strongly positive case. GAD2 immunostaining was most commonly seen in neuroendocrine carcinomas (58.3%) and neuroendocrine tumors (63.2%) of the pancreas, followed by granular cell tumors (37.0%) and neuroendocrine tumors of the lung (11.1%). GAD2 was only occasionally (<10% of cases) seen in 16 other tumor entities including paraganglioma, medullary thyroid carcinoma, and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Data on GAD2 and progesterone receptor (PR) expression (from a previous study) were available for 95 pancreatic and 380 extrapancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. For determining a pancreatic origin of a neuroendocrine neoplasm, the sensitivity of GAD2 was 64.2% and specificity 96.3%, while the sensitivity of PR was 56.8% and specificity 92.6%. The combination of PR and GAD2 increased both sensitivity and specificity. GAD2 immunohistochemistry is a highly useful diagnostic tool for the identification of pancreatic origin in case of neuroendocrine neoplasms with unknown site of origin.

PAX1 expression in thymic epithelial neoplasms and morphologic mimics

Thymic epithelial neoplasms are morphologically diverse and can pose a diagnostic challenge that is complicated by a lack of immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers that are entirely sensitive and specific for thymic epithelium. Polyclonal PAX8 is often used in this context, but it is not a specific marker. The PAX1 transcription factor shares significant homology with PAX8 and plays an integral role in thymic development in humans and murine models. This study evaluated the role of PAX1 IHC in differentiating thymic epithelial neoplasms from morphologic mimics on whole slide tissue sections. The PAX1 antibody stained all 74 thymoma cases; however, there was wide variability in staining intensity within each subtype. The antibody was less sensitive in thymic carcinomas and thymic neuroendocrine tumors compared to thymomas and demonstrated weak staining in a subset of morphologic mimics (21 squamous cell carcinomas, 6 pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors, 1 mesothelioma, 1 lymphoblastic lymphoma, and 1 granulosa cell tumor). With a H-score positive threshold of 75, the antibody had 100% specificity, and sensitivities of 92%, 56%, and 47% in thymomas, thymic neuroendocrine tumors, and thymic carcinomas respectively. The PAX1 antibody showed frequent geographic reduction in staining consistent with compromised antigenicity from variable formalin fixation. PAX1 IHC has a moderate-to-high sensitivity for thymic epithelial neoplasms; however, the wide staining variability and fixation effects may lead to difficulty with consistent interpretation. This marker is unlikely to supplant the role of PAX8 in diagnostic practice, but it may be a useful addition to immunohistochemistry panels when evaluating for thymic primary tumors.

Contemporary Clinical Definitions, Differential Diagnosis, and Novel Predictive Tools for Renal Cell Carcinoma

Despite significant progress regarding clinical detection/imaging evaluation modalities and genetic/molecular characterization of pathogenesis, advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains an incurable disease and overall RCC mortality has been steadily rising for decades. Concomitantly, clinical definitions have been greatly nuanced and refined. RCCs are currently viewed as a heterogeneous series of cancers, with the same anatomical origin, but fundamentally different metabolisms and clinical behaviors. Thus, RCC pathological diagnosis/subtyping guidelines have become increasingly intricate and cumbersome, routinely requiring ancillary studies, mainly immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, RCC-associated-antigen targeted systemic therapy has been greatly diversified and emerging, novel clinical applications for RCC immunotherapy have already reported significant survival benefits, at least in the adjuvant setting. Even so, systemically disseminated RCCs still associate very poor clinical outcomes, with currently available therapeutic modalities only being able to prolong survival. In lack of a definitive cure for advanced RCCs, integration of the amounting scientific knowledge regarding RCC pathogenesis into RCC clinical management has been paramount for improving patient outcomes. The current review aims to offer an integrative perspective regarding contemporary RCC clinical definitions, proper RCC clinical work-up at initial diagnosis (semiology and multimodal imaging), RCC pathological evaluation, differential diagnosis/subtyping protocols, and novel clinical tools for RCC screening, risk stratification and therapeutic response prediction.

Aberrant transcription factors in the cancers of the pancreas

Transcription factors (TFs) are essential for proper activation of gene set during the process of organogenesis, differentiation, lineage specificity. Reactivation or dysregulation of TFs regulatory networks could lead to deformation of organs, diseases including various malignancies. Currently, understanding the mechanism of oncogenesis became necessity for the development of targeted therapeutic strategy for different cancer types. It is evident that many TFs go awry in cancers of the pancreas such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs). These mutated or dysregulated TFs abnormally controls various signaling pathways in PDAC and PanNENs including RTK, PI3K-PTEN-AKT-mTOR, JNK, TGF-β/SMAD, WNT/β-catenin, SHH, NOTCH and VEGF which in turn regulate different hallmarks of cancer. Aberrant regulation of such pathways have been linked to the initiation, progression, metastasis, and resistance in pancreatic cancer. As of today, a number of TFs has been identified as crucial regulators of pancreatic cancer and a handful of them shown to have potential as therapeutic targets in pre-clinical and clinical settings. In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge on the role and therapeutic usefulness of TFs in PDAC and PanNENs.

PAX8 in the Junction between Development and Tumorigenesis

Normal processes of embryonic development and abnormal transformation to cancer have many parallels, and in fact many aberrant cancer cell capabilities are embryonic traits restored in a distorted, unorganized way. Some of these capabilities are cell autonomous, such as proliferation and resisting apoptosis, while others involve a complex interplay with other cells that drives significant changes in neighboring cells. The correlation between embryonic development and cancer is driven by shared proteins. Some embryonic proteins disappear after embryogenesis in adult differentiated cells and are restored in cancer, while others are retained in adult cells, acquiring new functions upon transformation to cancer. Many embryonic factors embraced by cancer cells are transcription factors; some are master regulators that play a major role in determining cell fate. The paired box (PAX) domain family of developmental transcription factors includes nine members involved in differentiation of various organs. All paired box domain proteins are involved in different cancer types carrying pro-tumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic roles. This review focuses on PAX8, a master regulator of transcription in embryonic development of the thyroid, kidney, and male and female genital tracts. We detail the role of PAX8 in each of these organ systems, describe its role during development and in the adult if known, and highlight its pro-tumorigenic role in cancers that emerge from PAX8 expressing organs.

Immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of renal epithelial neoplasms

Despite the increasing number of newly identified renal neoplasms, the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can usually be reached with careful histologic examination and a limited immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma account for more than 90% of renal neoplasia in adults, and sophisticated ancillary tools are usually unnecessary. Renal tumors with entity-defining genetic alterations may ultimately require molecular confirmation via cytogenetics or sequencing technologies, such as RCC with TFE3, TFEB, or ALK gene rearrangements, or TFEB amplified RCC. In fumarate hydratase-deficient and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, highly specific IHC markers can strongly suggest the diagnosis. In the metastatic setting, PAX8 and carbonic anhydrase 9 are among the most helpful markers for confirming RCC and clear cell type, respectively; however, caution should be exercised in the absence of a current or historical renal mass. In diagnostically challenging cases, such as renal eosinophilic tumors with low-grade nuclear features, or infiltrative high-grade tumors, careful examination coupled with a judicious panel of IHC markers usually resolves the diagnosis. This review offers concise algorithms for diagnosis of kidney neoplasia with the latest recognized, provisional, and emerging entities to daily pathology practice.

PAX8-positive, Cytokeratin-positive Intra-abdominal Ewing Sarcoma Masquerading as a Mullerian Carcinoma in a Postmenopausal Female

Extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma presenting as intra-abdominal or pelvic disease in adult female patients is very rare and may lead to diagnostic difficulty due to clinical and histologic overlap with Mullerian adenocarcinomas, which are far more common. We report a case of an intra-abdominal Ewing sarcoma in a postmenopausal female patient whose clinical and radiological presentation closely resembled that of peritoneal carcinomatosis. Biopsy of an omental nodule revealed numerous histologic features suggestive of a Mullerian carcinoma, including gland-like rosettes, strong, diffuse PAX8 immunoreactivity and cytokeratin expression. After excluding other differential diagnostic considerations, the possibility that this might represent an intra-abdominal Ewing sarcoma was entertained. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing demonstrated the presence of an EWSR1-ERG fusion transcript, confirming the diagnosis. The differential diagnostic considerations when dealing with this unusual clinical scenario and the uncommon yet important pitfall of PAX8 immunoreactivity in Ewing sarcoma are discussed.

PAX8 Expression in the Crystalline Lens and Lens-Derived Lesions

Purpose

Design

Participants

Methods

Main Outcome Measures

Results

Conclusions

Polyclonal PAX8 expression in carcinomas of the biliary tract - Frequent non-specific staining represents a potential diagnostic pitfall

Paired box protein 8 (PAX8) is a transcription factor that is considered a relatively specific marker of carcinomas of the thyroid, kidney, and Müllerian/Wolffian duct derivatives. Unexpected PAX8 immunoreactivity has occasionally been reported in other tumors. The frequency of PAX8 expression in carcinomas of the biliary tract is not well studied. We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of PAX8 in 73 cases of biliary tract carcinoma. We found that 28 of 73 (38%) biliary tract carcinomas had variable immunoreactivity for PAX8, assessed by a widely used polyclonal antibody (ProteinTech Group, Chicago, IL). This included 3 (4%) of cases with strong diffuse, and 14 (19%) of cases with strong focal staining. Strong PAX8 expression was more frequent in distal bile duct carcinomas than other biliary sites (p = 0.015), and showed a weak association with advanced T stage (T3-T4 versus T1-T2; p = 0.09). No correlation was observed between PAX8 positivity and age at diagnosis, gender, or lymph node metastasis. The 28 polyclonal PAX8-positive cases were largely negative for monoclonal PAX8 and PAX6 immunostains, with only rare tumor cells with weak immunoreactivity being present in a subset of cases. We show that a substantial fraction of biliary tract carcinomas exhibit immunoreactivity with a widely used polyclonal PAX8 antibody. Pathologists should be aware of this potential pitfall during the diagnostic workup of hepatobiliary lesions to avoid misdiagnosis as a metastasis from a PAX8-positive tumor.

Analysis of PAX8 immunohistochemistry in lung cancers: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the PAX8 immunohistochemical expressions in primary lung cancers and metastatic cancers to the lung.

METHODS

We identified and reviewed relevant articles from the PubMed databases. Ultimately, 18 articles were included in this meta-analysis. PAX8 expression rates were analyzed and compared between primary and metastatic lung cancers.

RESULTS

The PAX8 expression rate in primary lung cancers was 0.042 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.025 to 0.071). PAX8 expression rates of small cell (0.129; 95% CI, 0.022 to 0.496) and non-small cell carcinomas of the lung (0.037; 95% CI, 0.022 to 0.061) were significantly different (p=.049 in a meta-regression test). However, the PAX8 expression rates of adenocarcinoma (0.013; 95% CI, 0.006 to 0.031) and squamous cell carcinoma (0.040; 95% CI, 0.016 to 0.097) were not significantly different. PAX8 expression rates of metastatic carcinomas to the lung varied, ranging from 1.8% to 94.9%. Metastatic carcinomas from the lung to other organs had a PAX8 expression rate of 6.3%. The PAX8 expression rates of metastatic carcinomas from the female genital organs, kidneys, and thyroid gland to the lung were higher than those of other metastatic carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary lung cancers had a low PAX8 expression rate regardless of tumor subtype. However, the PAX8 expression rates of metastatic carcinomas from the female genital organs, kidneys, and thyroid were significantly higher than those of primary lung cancers.

An Algorithmic Immunohistochemical Approach to Define Tumor Type and Assign Site of Origin

Immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable complement to an epidemiology and morphology-driven approach to tumor diagnosis and site of origin assignment. This review reflects the state of my current practice, based on 15-years' experience in Pathology and a deep-dive into the literature, always striving to be better equipped to answer the age old questions, "What is it, and where is it from?" The tables and figures in this manuscript are the ones I "pull up on the computer" when I am teaching at the microscope and turn to myself when I am (frequently) stuck. This field is so exciting because I firmly believe that, through the application of next-generation immunohistochemistry, we can provide better answers than ever before. Specific topics covered in this review include (1) broad tumor classification and associated screening markers; (2) the role of cancer epidemiology in determining pretest probability; (3) broad-spectrum epithelial markers; (4) noncanonical expression of broad tumor class screening markers; (5) a morphologic pattern-based approach to poorly to undifferentiated malignant neoplasms; (6) a morphologic and immunohistochemical approach to define 4 main carcinoma types; (7) CK7/CK20 coordinate expression; (8) added value of semiquantitative immunohistochemical stain assessment; algorithmic immunohistochemical approaches to (9) "garden variety" adenocarcinomas presenting in the liver, (10) large polygonal cell adenocarcinomas, (11) the distinction of primary surface ovarian epithelial tumors with mucinous features from metastasis, (12) tumors presenting at alternative anatomic sites, (13) squamous cell carcinoma versus urothelial carcinoma, and neuroendocrine neoplasms, including (14) the distinction of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma from well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, site of origin assignment in (15) well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor and (16) poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and (17) the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; it concludes with (18) a discussion of diagnostic considerations in the broad-spectrum keratin/CD45/S-100-"triple-negative" neoplasm.

An Update on the Role of Immunohistochemistry in the Evaluation of Gastrointestinal Tract Disorders

As in other organ systems, immunohistochemistry (IHC) serves as an ancillary diagnostic tool for a wide variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic disorders, including infections, work-up of inflammatory conditions, and subtyping neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. In addition, IHC is also used to detect a variety of prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for carcinomas of the GI tract. The purpose of this review is to highlight the use of IHC in common diagnostic scenarios throughout the tubular GI tract. The clinical indication and guidelines for performing IHC for detecting Helicobacter pylori is discussed along with role of gastrin and neuroendocrine markers in the diagnosis of autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis. The major portion of this review discusses the use of IHC in the diagnostic workup of malignant neoplasms of the GI tract, such as adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma, workup of poorly differentiated malignant neoplasms, and evaluation of uncommon gastric neoplasms (alpha-feto protein-producing carcinomas) and switch/sucrose-nonfermenting complex-deficient carcinomas. Lastly, localization of neuroendocrine tumors of unknown origin to aid clinical management, as well as HPV-driven anal neoplasia and IHC in the workup of basaloid anal neoplasms are also reviewed.

Pathologic Considerations in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This review serves as a primer on contemporary neuroendocrine neoplasm classification, with an emphasis on gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Topics discussed include general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor from pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and other diagnostic mimics and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma from diagnostic mimics, the concepts of differentiation and grade and the application of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry to determine the latter, the various WHO classifications of neuroendocrine neoplasms including the 2019 WHO classification of gastroenteropancreatic tumors, organ-specific considerations for gastroenteropancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine site of origin in metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of occult origin, immunohistochemistry in the distinction of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, and, finally, required and recommended reporting elements for biopsies and resections of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms.

Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: what can brown do for you?

This review is based on a presentation given at the Hans Popper Hepatopathology Society companion meeting at the 2019 United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology Annual Meeting. It presents updates on the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with an emphasis on the role of immunohistochemistry. Neuroendocrine neoplasms often present in liver biopsies as metastases of occult origin. Specific topics covered include 1. general features of neuroendocrine neoplasms, 2. general neuroendocrine marker immunohistochemistry, with discussion of the emerging marker INSM1, 3. non-small cell carcinoma with (occult) neuroendocrine differentiation, 4. the WHO Classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with discussion of the 2019 classification of gastroenteropancreatic neoplasms, 5. use of Ki-67 immunohistochemistry, 6. immunohistochemistry to assign site of origin in neuroendocrine metastasis of occult origin, 7. immunohistochemistry to distinguish well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor G3 from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, 8. lesions frequently misdiagnosed as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, and 9. required and recommended data elements for biopsies and resections with associated immunohistochemical stains. Next-generation immunohistochemistry, including lineage-restricted transcription factors (e.g., CDX2, islet 1, OTP, SATB2) and protein correlates of molecular genetic events (e.g., p53, Rb), is indispensable for the accurate diagnosis and classification of these neoplasms.

Molecular Modelling of Islet β-Cell Adaptation to Inflammation in Pregnancy and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a metabolic disease that develops with the increase in insulin resistance during late pregnancy, is currently one of the most common complications affecting pregnancy. The polygenic nature of GDM, together with the interplay between different genetic variants with nutritional and environmental factors has hindered the full understanding of the etiology of this disease. However, an important genetic overlap has been found with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and, as in the case of T2DM, most of the identified loci are associated with β-cell function. Early detection of GDM and adequate interventions to control the maternal glycemia are necessary to avoid the adverse outcomes for both the mother and the offspring. The in utero exposure to the diabetic milieu predispose these children for future diseases, among them T2DM, originating a vicious circle implicated in the increased prevalence of both GDM and T2DM. The involvement of inflammatory processes in the development of GDM highlights the importance of pancreatic β-cell factors able to favor the adaptation processes required during gestation, concomitantly with the protection of the islets from an inflammatory milieu. In this regard, two members of the Pax family of transcription factors, PAX4 and PAX8, together with the chromatin remodeler factor HMG20A, have gained great relevance due to their involvement in β-cell mass adaptation together with their anti-inflammatory properties. Mutations in these factors have been associated with GDM, highlighting these as novel candidates for genetic screening analysis in the identification of women at risk of developing GDM.

Expression of PAX3 Distinguishes Biphenotypic Sinonasal Sarcoma From Histologic Mimics

Biphenotypic sinonasal sarcoma (BSNS) is a distinctive, anatomically restricted, low-grade spindle cell sarcoma that shows considerable histologic overlap with other cellular spindle cell neoplasms. This tumor type shows both myogenic and neural differentiation, which can be demonstrated by immunohistochemistry; however, the available diagnostic markers are relatively nonspecific. BSNS is characterized by PAX3 rearrangements, with MAML3 as the most common fusion partner. Our aim was to determine whether immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal PAX3 antibody could distinguish BSNS from potential histologic mimics, as well as to evaluate a widely available polyclonal PAX8 antibody, which is known to cross-react with other paired box transcription factor family members. Immunohistochemistry for PAX3 and PAX8 was performed on whole sections of 15 BSNS (10 with confirmed PAX3 rearrangement) and 10 cases each of the following histologic mimics: malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, monophasic synovial sarcoma, spindle cell rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), solitary fibrous tumor, sinonasal hemangiopericytoma, and cellular schwannoma, as well as alveolar RMS (which harbors PAX3 or PAX7 gene rearrangements). BSNS showed consistent expression of PAX3 (15/15), all multifocal-to-diffuse and most with moderate-to-strong intensity of staining. One single case of spindle cell RMS showed PAX3 expression (1/10), and all other histologic mimics were completely PAX3-negative. In contrast, nuclear staining for PAX8 was present in all 15 BSNS, 7/10 malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, 3/10 cellular schwannomas, 2/10 sinonasal hemangiopericytomas, 1/10 synovial sarcoma, 1 spindle cell RMS, and 1 solitary fibrous tumor. All cases of alveolar RMS were positive for PAX8, and most were also positive for PAX3 (8/10). Immunohistochemical expression of PAX3 is highly sensitive (100%) and specific (98%) for BSNS. A polyclonal PAX8 antibody also stains BSNS (likely due to cross-reactivity with PAX3) but has much lower specificity (75%), with frequent expression in numerous mimics.

PAX proteins and their role in pancreas

Gene regulatory factors that govern the expression of heritable information come in an array of flavors, chiefly with transcription factors, the proteins which bind to regions of specific genes and modulate gene transcription, subsequently altering cellular function. PAX transcription factors are sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins exerting its regulatory activity in many tissues. Notably, three members of the PAX family namely PAX2, PAX4 and PAX6 have emerged as crucial players at multiple steps of pancreatic development and differentiation and also play a pivotal role in the regulation of pancreatic islet hormones synthesis and secretion. Providing a comprehensive outline of these transcription factors and their primordial and divergent roles in the pancreas is far-reaching in contemporary diabetes research. Accordingly, this review furnishes an outline of the role of pancreatic specific PAX regulators in the development of the pancreas and its associated disorders.

Practical Application of Lineage-Specific Immunohistochemistry Markers: Transcription Factors (Sometimes) Behaving Badly

CONTEXT.—

Transcription factors (TFs) are proteins that regulate gene expression and control RNA transcription from DNA. Lineage-specific TFs have increasingly been used by pathologists to determine tumor lineage, especially in the setting of metastatic tumors of unknown primary, among other uses. With experience gathered from its daily application and increasing pitfalls reported from immunohistochemical studies, these often-touted highly specific TFs are not as reliable as once thought.

OBJECTIVES.—

To summarize the established roles of many of the commonly used TFs in clinical practice and to discuss known and potential sources for error (eg, false-positivity from cross-reactivity, aberrant, and overlap "lineage-specific" expression) in their application and interpretation.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature review and the authors' personal practice experience were used. Several examples selected from the University Health Network (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) are illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS.—

The application of TF diagnostic immunohistochemistry has enabled pathologists to better assess the lineage/origin of primary and metastatic tumors. However, the awareness of potential pitfalls is essential to avoid misdiagnosis.

Renal medullary carcinoma in a young mixed-race man in Japan

Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare and aggressive cancer associated with the sickle cell trait. The diagnosis of RMC depends on recognition of its histologic features and immunohistochemical deficiency of INI1, but correct diagnosis is sometimes difficult, especially if a patient's information on race, past, and family medical history is unclear. At present, this is the first report on RMC in Japan.

Does Strong and Diffuse PAX-8 Positivity Occur in Primary Lung Carcinoma? An Immunohistochemical Study of 418 Cases and Review of the Literature

Although rare cases of PAX-8-positive primary lung carcinoma have been reported, details of staining distribution and intensity in such cases are limited. The aim of this study was to determine whether strong and diffuse PAX-8 staining can occur in primary lung carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining for PAX-8 (Rabbit polyclonal, 10336-1-AP; Proteintech) was performed on whole-tissue sections from 418 resected primary lung carcinomas. PAX-8 was positive in 5/418 (1.2%) cases, all of which were large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas. Staining was weak to moderate in all 5 cases, and was seen in 5% to 30% of tumor cells. All other primary lung carcinomas (413/418) were negative for PAX-8. This study-the largest series of PAX-8-stained whole-tissue sections of primary lung carcinoma to date-shows that strong and diffuse staining for PAX-8 does not occur in primary lung carcinoma of any type. This staining pattern in a carcinoma in a lung specimen provides strong evidence of nonpulmonary origin.

Silencing of long noncoding RNA LINC00958 prevents tumor initiation of pancreatic cancer by acting as a sponge of microRNA-330-5p to down-regulate PAX8

Pancreatic cancer (PC) represents a relatively rare but severe malignancy worldwide. Accumulated studies have emphasized the potential of long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) as therapeutic strategies for several human cancers. Thus, we aimed to investigate whether a novel non-coding RNA regulatory circuitry involved in PC. Aberrantly expressed lncRNAs and mRNAs were screened out of microarray database. Following the determination of RNA expression, PANC-1 and BxPC-3 PC cells were adopted, after which the expression of miR-330-5p, PAX8 and LINC00958 were subsequently altered. RNA crosstalk was validated by dual-luciferase reporter gene assay. In order to detect whether LINC00958 could act as ceRNA to competitively sponge miR-330-5p and regulate PAX8, subcellular location of LINC00958 and interaction between LINC00958 and miR-330-5p were measured by FISH and RNA pull down respectively. The epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, cell invasion, and tumor growth were determined in vitro and in vivo. LINC00958 and PAX8 were up-regulated, while miR-330-5p was down-regulated during PC. LINC00958 mainly expressed in the cytoplasm and LINC00958 competitively sponged miR-330-5p. Upregulated miR-330-5p or downregulated PAX8 inhibited the EMT process as well as the invasion and metastasis ability of the PC cells. Moreover, the results indicated that miR-330-5p negatively targeted PAX8, and LINC00958 ultimately showcasing its ability to bind to miR-330-5p through its interaction with AGO2. Therefore, silencing of LINC00958 may bind to miR-330-5p to inhibit PAX8 in a competitive fashion, thereby preventing the progression of PC.

Histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular markers of neuroendocrine neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arise from cells of the neuroendocrine system located in many sites amongst which most common are the gastrointestinal (GI) system and the lung. The efforts to assess the specific site of origin or predict the biological behavior of NENs is based upon a detailed study of neoplasm's architectural pattern, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular profile. Immunohistochemistry is used to characterize the aggressivity of NENs, by assessing the proliferation index Ki-67, as well as the neuroendocrine differentiation by assessing chromogranin A (CgA) and CD56. Basal panels of immunohistochemical markers such as CDX-2, Isl-1, TTF-1, PAX6/8 are currently being used to allocate the neoplasms, while in dubious cases new markers are investigating. Unraveling the genetic and molecular mechanisms of NENs pathogenesis along with shedding light on the molecular heterogeneity of neoplasms and the individual patterns of molecular lesions, underlining these neoplasms may provide new tools in terms of diagnostics and therapeutics. Molecular targeted therapies (MTTs) such as everolimus and sunitinib have been the first example of druggable molecular targets implicated in NENs that have been approved for NEN treatment. New investigational drugs are developing along with genetic tests that may allow the identification of the specific subset of patients that will respond to each individual MTT. Multiparametrical molecular and genetic analysis such as the NETest and the MASTER are already in trials shedding light in a step-by-step management of NENs that allow not only the selection of an appropriate therapeutic option but also the identification of response to treatment or early relapse allowing an early amendment of the strategy. Summarizing the combination of histopathological, immunohistochemical, genetic and molecular profile of a NEN opens new horizons in the efficient management of NENs.

Immunohistochemical Biomarkers of Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, Pulmonary, and Thymic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of epithelial neoplastic proliferations that irrespective of their primary site share features of neural and endocrine differentiation including the presence of secretory granules, synaptic-like vesicles, and the ability to produce amine and/or peptide hormones. NENs encompass a wide spectrum of neoplasms ranging from well-differentiated indolent tumors to highly aggressive poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Most cases arise in the digestive system and in thoracic organs, i.e., the lung and thymus. A correct diagnostic approach is crucial for the management of patients with both digestive and thoracic NENs, because their high clinical and biological heterogeneity is related to their prognosis and response to therapy. In this context, immunohistochemistry represents an indispensable diagnostic tool that pathologists need to use for the correct diagnosis and classification of such neoplasms. In addition, immunohistochemistry is also useful in identifying prognostic and theranostic markers. In the present article, the authors will review the role of immunohistochemistry in the routine workup of digestive and thoracic NENs.

Pathology of Neuroendocrine Tumours of the Female Genital Tract

Neuroendocrine tumours are uncommon or rare at all sites in the female genital tract. The 2014 World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification of neuroendocrine tumours of the endometrium, cervix, vagina and vulva has been updated with adoption of the terms low-grade neuroendocrine tumour and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. In the endometrium and cervix, high-grade neoplasms are much more prevalent than low-grade and are more common in the cervix than the corpus. In the ovary, low-grade tumours are more common than high-grade carcinomas and the term carcinoid tumour is still used in WHO 2014. The term ovarian small-cell carcinoma of pulmonary type is included in WHO 2014 for a tumour which in other organs is termed high small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Neuroendocrine tumours at various sites within the female genital tract often occur in association with other neoplasms and more uncommonly in pure form.

Immunohistochemistry, carcinomas of unknown primary, and incidence rates

Pathologists use immunohistochemistry is their day-to-day practices to assist in distinguishing site of origin of metastatic carcinomas. Here, the work-up is discussed neuroendocrine carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas with particular attention to tumor incident rates and predictive values of the best-performing immunohistochemical markers.

Pax2/Pax8-defined subdomains and the occurrence of apoptosis in the posterior placodal area of mice

The present work aims to improve our understanding of the causes and functions of apoptosis during the morphogenesis of epibranchial placodes in mice. Schematic maps helped to compare the spatiotemporal sequence of apoptotic events with the protein expression patterns of general (Six1) and specific placodal markers (Pax2, Pax8). Our findings challenge the view that, in mammals, all three epibranchial placodes spring from the original posterior placodal area (PPA) of presomite or early somite embryos. Instead, close-meshed analysis of the Pax2/Pax8 expression patterns demonstrates the stepwise emergence of two subdomains which both belong to the gradually expanding PPA, and which largely give rise to the otic placode and epibranchial placode 1 (anterior subdomain), or to the caudal epibranchial placodes (posterior subdomain). Our observations reinforce previous doubts raised on the PPA progeny of early somite Xenopus embryos (Schlosser and Ahrens, Dev Biol 271:439-466, 2004). They also demonstrate that partly different Pax2/Pax8 codes accompany epibranchial placode development in Xenopus laevis and mice. In mice, interplacodal apoptosis assists in the establishment of the two PPA subdomains and, subsequently, of individualized placodes by predominantly eliminating Six1⁺ placodal precursor cells. Onset of interplacodal and intraplacodal large-scale apoptosis is almost always preceded and/or paralleled by Pax2/Pax8 expression minima in the very same region. Future work will demand the use of knock-out mice and whole embryo culture to experimentally test, whether the combined action of differentially expressed Pax2 and Pax8 genes exerts antiapoptotic effects in the mammalian PPA.

Targeting pancreatic expressed PAX genes for the treatment of diabetes mellitus and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

INTRODUCTION

Four members of the PAX family, PAX2, PAX4, PAX6 and PAX8 are known to be expressed in the pancreas. Accumulated evidences indicate that several pancreatic expressed PAX genes play a significant role in pancreatic development/functionality and alterations in these genes are involved in the pathogenesis of pancreatic diseases. Areas covered: In this review, we summarize the ongoing research related to pancreatic PAX genes in diabetes mellitus and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. We dissect the current knowledge at different levels; from mechanistic studies in cell lines performed to understand the molecular processes controlled by pancreatic PAX genes, to in vivo studies using rodent models that over-express or lack specific PAX genes. Finally, we describe human studies associating variants on pancreatic-expressed PAX genes with pancreatic diseases. Expert opinion: Based on the current literature, we propose that future interventions to treat pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and diabetes mellitus could be developed via the modulation of PAX4 and/or PAX6 regulated pathways.

Practical Applications in Immunohistochemistry: Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site

CONTEXT

-Identification of the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary using immunohistochemistry is a frequent requirement of anatomic pathologists. Diagnostic accuracy is crucial, particularly in the current era of targeted therapies and smaller sample sizes.

OBJECTIVES

-To provide practical guidance and suggestions for classifying carcinoma of unknown primary using both proven and new antibodies, as well as targeting panels based on integration of morphologic and clinical features.

DATA SOURCES

-Literature review, the authors' practice experience, and authors' research.

CONCLUSIONS

-With well-performed and interpreted immunohistochemistry panels, anatomic pathologists can successfully identify the site of origin of carcinoma of unknown primary. It is crucial to understand not only the diagnostic uses of the many available antibodies but also the potential limits and pitfalls.

Problems with the diagnosis of metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Which diagnostic criteria should we use to determine tumor origin and help guide therapy?

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) can often present with metastatic disease before the primary tumor is discovered. Metastatic lesions are generally classified as well differentiated and poorly differentiated for prognostic and therapeutic purposes. In addition, for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs), pathologists are expected to determine the site of origin, if not already known, and grade the tumors. However, it is often difficult for pathologists to provide this information with certainty without knowing the site of tumor origin, as different criteria have been proposed by WHO for classification of gastrointestinal and pulmonary NENs. In this review, we will discuss the current classification and grading schema of NENs and their impact on clinical care, the differential diagnosis of NENs, the use of immunohistochemical stains that help identify tumor site of origin, and a proposed approach for the diagnosis and classification of metastatic NENs.

Comparison of PAX6 and PAX8 as immunohistochemical markers for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

To compare the utility of PAX6 and PAX8 as immunohistochemical markers for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of pancreatic origin, we performed PAX6 and PAX8 immunostains on 178 NETs, including 110 primary NETs (26 pancreatic, 10 gastric, 12 duodenal, 22 jejuno-ileal, 10 rectal, 30 pulmonary) and 68 NETs metastatic to the liver (24 pancreatic, 1 duodenal, 37 jejuno-ileal, 1 rectal, 5 pulmonary). Among primary NETs, PAX6 and PAX8 were positive in 65 % (17/26) and 73 % (19/26) of pancreatic, 0 % (0/10) and 10 % (1/10) of gastric, 92 % (11/12) and 92 % (11/12) of duodenal, 0 % (0/22) and 0 % (0/22) of jejuno-ileal, 90 % (9/10) and 80 % (8/10) of rectal, and 0 % (0/30) and 23 % (7/30) of pulmonary NETs, respectively. PAX6 and PAX8 positivity was seen in 46 % (11/24) and 50 % (12/24) of metastatic pancreatic NETs to the liver, respectively. None of the nonpancreatic NETs metastatic to the liver were immunoreactive for either PAX6 or PAX8. PAX6 showed a slightly but statistically significant higher specificity for pancreatic NETs than did PAX8 (P = 0.039), while the sensitivities were similar (P = 0.51). PAX6 had the additional advantages over PAX8 of not exhibiting nonspecific cytoplasmic staining of tumor cells and only infrequently staining background lymphocytes. Since rectal NETs rarely present with metastatic disease, positive staining of a metastatic NET of unknown primary origin for PAX6 and/or PAX8 favors a pancreatic or duodenal origin. This information may be helpful in directing further diagnostic studies to identify the primary site of the metastatic tumor.

Immunohistochemistry in undifferentiated neoplasm/tumor of uncertain origin

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry has become an indispensable ancillary study in the identification and classification of undifferentiated neoplasms/tumors of uncertain origin. The diagnostic accuracy has significantly improved because of the continuous discoveries of tissue-specific biomarkers and the development of effective immunohistochemical panels.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and classify undifferentiated neoplasms/tumors of uncertain origin by immunohistochemistry.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS

To better guide therapeutic decisions and predict prognostic outcomes, it is crucial to differentiate the specific lineage of an undifferentiated neoplasm. Application of appropriate immunohistochemical panels enables the accurate classification of most undifferentiated neoplasms. Knowing the utilities and pitfalls of each tissue-specific biomarker is essential for avoiding potential diagnostic errors because an absolutely tissue-specific biomarker is exceptionally rare. We review frequently used tissue-specific biomarkers, provide effective panels, and recommend diagnostic algorithms as a standard approach to undifferentiated neoplasms.

Utility of immunohistochemistry in the pancreatobiliary tract

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry has become a useful ancillary study in the identification and classification of pancreatic neoplasms. The diagnostic accuracy has been significantly improved because of the continuous discoveries of tumor-associated biomarkers and the development of effective immunohistochemical panels.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and classify pancreatic neoplasms by immunohistochemistry.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review and authors' research data and personal practice experience were used.

CONCLUSIONS

To better guide therapeutic decisions and predict the prognostic outcome, it is crucial to make an accurate diagnosis of a pancreatic neoplasm. Application of appropriate immunohistochemical panels enables pathologists to differentiate pancreaticobiliary adenocarcinomas from reactive conditions and to identify rare types of pancreatic neoplasms. Knowing the utilities and pitfalls of each tumor-associated biomarker is essential to avoiding a potential diagnostic error because an absolutely cancer-specific biomarker does not exist. This article reviews frequently used tumor-associated biomarkers, provides lists of effective immunohistochemical panels, and recommends a diagnostic algorithm as a standard approach to pancreatic neoplasms.

PAX immunoreactivity in poorly differentiated small round cell tumors of childhood

Paired box (PAX) gene antibodies have made it into the mainstream of tumor diagnosis in the recent years. We report the immunoreactivity expression patterns of three PAX genes (PAX2, PAX5 and PAX8) in poorly differentiated small round cell tumors of childhood for possible useful diagnostic applications. We collected and analyzed 123 cases of poorly differentiated small round cell tumors of childhood for their PAX immunoexpression patterns. The results indicated that PAX2 was strongly positive in all alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas and in two-thirds of the kidney clear cell sarcomas, and displayed variable expression in one-half of the embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas. PAX8 immunoexpression was noticed in five and three cases of alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas and embryonal rhabdomyosarcomas, respectively. About one-third of malignant rhabdoid tumors were PAX2-positive and PAX8-positive. All of the Ewing sarcoma and neuroblastoma cases stained negative with all three PAX stains.

Evaluation of PAX2 and PAX8 expression in salivary gland neoplasms

PAX2 and PAX8 are transcription factors involved in embryogenesis that have been utilized as immunohistochemical indicators of tumor origin. Specifically, PAX2 is a marker of neoplasms of renal and müllerian origin, while PAX8 is expressed by renal, müllerian, and thyroid tumors. While studies examining these transcription factors in a variety of tumors have been published, data regarding their expression in salivary gland neoplasms are limited. The goal of this study was to assess expression of PAX2 and PAX8 in a large cohort of salivary gland tumors. Utilizing tissue microarrays, samples of normal salivary glands (n = 68) and benign and malignant salivary gland neoplasms (n = 442) were evaluated for nuclear immunoreactivity with PAX2 and PAX8. No expression was observed with either marker in the normal salivary glands, and PAX8 was negative in all neoplasms. Focal expression of PAX2 was observed in one example each of oncocytoma and acinic cell carcinoma. These results indicate that evaluation of PAX2 and/or PAX8 expression would be valuable in differentiating primary salivary gland tumors from metastases known to express PAX2 and/or PAX8.

Immunohistochemistry in Gastroenterohepatopancreatobiliary Epithelial Neoplasia: Practical Applications, Pitfalls, and Emerging Markers

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) has broad applications in neoplastic gastrointestinal surgical pathology. Although classically used as a diagnostic tool, IHC increasingly provides prognostic and predictive information. This review highlights 11 key uses of IHC (Box 1). Emphasis is placed on specific clinical applications and qualitative aspects of interpretation. Common pitfalls are specifically highlighted. The potential application of emerging markers is discussed in relation to several of the 11 topics. In many instances, an immunostain serves as a surrogate for specific molecular genetic events. Survey of relevant articles forms the evidence basis for this review.

Guidelines for biomarker testing in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

The annual incidence of neuroendocrine tumours in the Caucasian population ranges from 2.5 to 5 new cases per 100,000 inhabitants. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours is a family of neoplasms widely variable in terms of anatomical location, hormone composition, clinical syndromes they cause and in their biological behaviour. This high complexity and clinical heterogeneity, together with the known difficulty of predicting their behaviour from their pathological features, are reflected in the many classifications that have been developed over the years in this field. This article reviews the main tissue and clinical biomarkers and makes recommendations for their use in medical practice. This document represents a consensus reached jointly by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP).

PAX8 mouse monoclonal antibody [BC12] recognizes a restricted epitope and is highly sensitive in renal cell and ovarian cancers but does not cross-react with b cells and tumors of pancreatic origin

PAX8 is expressed in a high percentage of renal cell and ovarian cancers; however, the current existing anti-PAX8 rabbit polyclonal (P) antibodies also recognize B cells, pancreatic cancers, carcinoids, and some soft tissue tumors. Cross-reactivity with B cells can be especially troublesome in lymph nodes when identifying tumors of unknown origin. A new mouse monoclonal (M) anti-PAX8 antibody (Clone BC12) has been developed that recognizes PAX8 expression in a high percentage of renal cell and ovarian carcinomas, whereas exhibiting no staining of B cells. PAX8 (M) was tested for specificity and sensitivity in over 1300 cases of both normal and neoplastic tissues. PAX8 (M) demonstrated superior staining sensitivity in clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas (88.8% vs. 84.4%) and in serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (87% vs. 83%), when compared with PAX8 (P). PAX8 (M) also stained a high percentage of endometrial and thyroid cancers, 67.5% and 60.7%, respectively. PAX8 (M) demonstrated low sensitivity in cervical and bladder cancers, 2.5% and 1.4%, respectively. All other cancers including lung, breast, prostate, stomach, liver, soft tissue, pancreas, testis, brain, colon, melanoma, lymphoma, adrenal, pituitary, and rectal were negative. In normal tissue, PAX8 (P) stained lymph nodes, pancreas, and neuroendocrine cells of stomach and colon. In contrast, PAX8 (M) was negative in each of these tissues. These results demonstrate that mouse monoclonal PAX8 [BC12] stains nuclei exclusively and performs well in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. PAX8 (M) is a highly sensitive marker for thyroid, renal, and ovarian cancers. Importantly, PAX8 (M) does not stain B cells and does not seem to recognize epitopes of pancreatic origin and neuroendocrine cells in stomach and colon; thus, providing superior specificity and making PAX8 [BC12] an excellent marker for confirming primary tumor site and for differential diagnosis.

Islet-1 is a sensitive but not entirely specific marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and their metastases

Islet-1 (Isl1) is a transcription factor involved in the embryogenesis of islets of Langerhans. Immunohistochemically, Isl1 is a sensitive lineage-specific marker for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and their metastases. Its specificity has not been documented, nor have large numbers of NENs from other parts of the gut or other organs been studied. We examined Isl1 expression in 203 primary NENs (gastroenteropancreatic, lung, breast, and ovarian neoplasms) and 40 hepatic NEN metastases (enteropancreatic and lung neoplasms) from known primaries. The correlation between Isl1 and CDX2 expression was studied using a tissue microarray containing 46 pancreatic NENs. Immunostaining for Isl1 and CDX2 was also performed in selected NENs from other sites. Isl1 was positive in 90% of pancreatic, 89% of duodenal, 100% of rectal, 38% of colonic, 14% of appendiceal, and 6% of ileal primaries. Isl1 was negative in all other NENs. Among metastatic neoplasms, 76% of pancreatic and 2 of 2 rectal NEN metastases were Isl1 positive, whereas all other tested metastases were negative. The overall sensitivity and specificity of Isl1 in identifying primary pancreatic NENs was 88% and 80%, respectively. Thirty-six of 46 pancreatic NENs in the tissue microarray were Isl1 positive; 4 were Isl1 negative but CDX2 positive. Our findings confirm that Isl1 is a sensitive marker of pancreatic origin in cases of metastatic NEN. However, Isl1 does not distinguish pancreatic NEN from duodenal and colorectal NEN, even when used in association with CDX2.

Differentiation of stem cells into insulin-producing cells: current status and challenges

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most serious public health challenges of the twenty-first century. Allogenic islet transplantation is an efficient therapy for type 1 diabetes. However, immune rejection, side effects of immunosuppressive treatment as well as lack of sufficient donor organs limits its potential. In recent years, several promising approaches for generation of new pancreatic β cells have been developed. This review provides an overview of current status of pancreatic and extra-pancreatic stem cells differentiation into insulin-producing cells and the possible application of these cells for diabetes treatment. The PubMed database was searched for English language articles published between 2001 and 2012, using the keyword combinations: diabetes mellitus, differentiation, insulin-producing cells, stem cells.

PAX8 and PAX5 are differentially expressed in B-cell and T-cell lymphomas

AIMS

  The purpose of this study was to evaluate the expression patterns of B-cell specific activator protein (BSAP)/PAX5 and PAX8 in a wide variety of B-cell and T-cell neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

  A wide range of B-cell and T-cell neoplasms were subjected to immunohistochemical staining with antibodies against BSAP/PAX5 and PAX8 (polyclonal, pPAX8; monoclonal, mPAX8). Ten non-neoplastic lymph node specimens were examined with the same panel. All of the tested neoplastic and non-neoplastic B-cells reacted with the BSAP/PAX5 and pPAX8 antibodies, but did not show reactivity with the mPAX8 antibody. All tested T-cell neoplasms were negative using the BSAP/PAX5, pPAX8 and mPAX8 antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

  This is the first study to show the absence of reactivity to an mPAX8 antibody in an expanded panel of B-cell lymphomas as well as in a variety of T-cell neoplasms. In contrast to the mPAX8 antibody, the pPAX8 antibody shows nuclear positivity in non-neoplastic B cells and mature B-cell neoplasms; however, this expression is probably a result of cross-reactivity with PAX5. Given that many laboratories use the pPAX8 antibody, a clear understanding of the differential staining patterns is necessary. The differential diagnosis of a B-cell lymphoma should be entertained when a pPAX8-positive, epithelial marker-negative neoplasm of uncertain primary origin is encountered.

Value of PAX 8 immunostaining in tumor diagnosis: a review and update

PAX 8 is a transcription factor involved in the regulation of organogenesis of the thyroid gland, kidney, and Müllerian system. Recent studies have shown that, among tumors, PAX 8 is commonly expressed in epithelial tumors of the thyroid and parathyroid glands, kidney, thymus, and female genital tract. Although PAX 8 expression has also been reported in certain neuroendocrine tumors, including well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and duodenal and rectal carcinoids, as well as in B-cell lymphomas, it has recently been shown that the PAX 8 positivity reported in these tumors was due to a cross-reactivity of the antibody used with the N-terminal region of PAX 6 and PAX 5, respectively. Owing to its restricted expression, PAX 8 has proved to be a useful immunohistochemical marker with a wide range of diagnostic applications in surgical pathology, some of which are briefly reviewed.

Recent progress in histochemistry and cell biology

Studies published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology in the year 2011 represent once more a manifest of established and newly sophisticated techniques being exploited to put tissue- and cell type-specific molecules into a functional context. The review is therefore the Histochemistry and Cell Biology's yearly intention to provide interested readers appropriate summaries of investigations touching the areas of tissue biology, developmental biology, the biology of the immune system, stem cell research, the biology of subcellular compartments, in order to put the message of such studies into natural scientific-/human- and also pathological-relevant correlations.