Workplace-related risk of tick bites in military personnel stationed in Northern Germany

Infectious risks associated with outdoor sports activities

In France, outdoor sports and activities account for 36% of sports engagement, making outdoor venues the most popular settings for sports participation. Discussing the links between sports and health almost always highlights the beneficial impact of engaging in sports. However, due to a lack of specific notifications, infectious risks are not subject to epidemiological monitoring, and need to be better understood. Since the practice of outdoor sports has become part and parcel of many individuals' daily routines, it is essential to more accurately characterize the knowledge we have gained about the risks associated with exposure. However, directly associating the practice of a sport with an elevated risk of infectious diseases is a challenging endeavor. Sociological factors based on risk awareness and adoption of protective behaviors in response to the risk are crucial to the orientation of prevention efforts. This review deals with several (bacteriological, viral, parasitic, and mycological) infectious risks related to outdoor activities practiced in a natural field via contamination routes such as tick-bite, enteric pathogen, skin, and aerosol transmission. We have also detailed a number of preventive measures taking into account the outdoor setting (e.g., vaccination).

The diagnostic value of serum Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies and seroconversion after Lyme neuroborreliosis, a nationwide observational study

OBJECTIVES

Clinical guidelines disagree on the diagnostic usefulness of Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) serum antibodies (serum-Bb) in investigation of Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). We investigated the association between serum-Bb and Bb intrathecal antibody index (Bb-AI) and rates of seroconversion and seroreversion after LNB.

METHODS

Danish residents who had a Bb-AI and corresponding serum-Bb measured between 1994-2020 were identified at all Danish departments of clinical microbiology. We used descriptive statistics to examine the proportions of positive Bb-AI combined with positive or negative serum-Bb antibody tests. Next, the rate of seroconversion and seroreversion among those with positive Bb-AI and either an initial negative or positive serum-Bb was estimated.

RESULTS

We included 34 609 individuals with a Bb-AI and corresponding serum-Bb. The proportion of individuals with positive Bb-AI who had negative serum-Bb was 16.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 15.1-18.6). The proportion of individuals with positive serum-Bb IgM, serum-Bb IgG or serum-Bb IgM and IgG antibodies who had positive Bb-AI was 10.6% (95% CI, 9.5-11.8), 24.7% (95% CI, 23.0-26.4) and 45.0% (95% CI, 42.4-48.0), respectively. The proportion of children (<18 years) with positive serum-Bb IgM and IgG antibodies who had a positive Bb-AI was 59.7% (95% CI, 53.4-65.8). The proportion of individuals with positive Bb-AI with initial negative or positive serum-Bb antibodies who seroconverted or seroreverted within 2 years was 17.3% (95% CI, 6.9-27.8) and 23.2% (95% CI, 19.1-27.7), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum-Bb antibodies could not predict results of Bb-AI. A fifth of both seronegative and seropositive individuals with positive Bb-AI seroconverted or seroreverted within 2 years.

Occupational Lyme Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lyme disease (LD) can have significant consequences for the health of workers. The frequency of infection can be estimated by using prevalence and incidence data on antibodies against Borrelia Burgdoferi (BB). A systematic search of studies published in English between 2002 and 2021 and a meta-analysis were conducted in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Out of a total of 1125 studies retrieved, 35 articles were included in the systematic review. Overall, in these studies, outdoor workers showed a 20.5% BB seroprevalence rate. Meta-analysis, performed on 15 studies (3932 subjects), revealed a significantly increased risk in outdoor activities (OR 1.93 95%CI 1.15–3.23), with medium-level heterogeneity (I² = 69.2%), and non-significant publication bias. The estimated OR in forestry and agricultural workers was 2.36 (CI95% 1.28; 4.34) in comparison with the controls, while a non-significant increase in risk (OR = 1.05, CI95% 0.28; 3.88) was found in the remaining categories of workers (veterinarians, animal breeders, soldiers). The estimated pooled risk was significantly higher in the studies published until 2010 (OR 3.03 95%CI 1.39–6.61), while in more recent studies the odds became non-significant (OR 1.08 95% CI 0.63–1.85). The promotion of awareness campaigns targeting outdoor workers in endemic areas, and the implementation of local programs aimed at controlling range expansion of vectors, are key strategies for protecting workers.