Human temperature regulation during cycling with moderate leg ischaemia

Dose-dependent nonthermal modulation of whole body heat exchange during dynamic exercise in humans

To maintain heat balance during exercise, humans rely on skin blood flow and sweating to facilitate whole body dry and evaporative heat exchange. These responses are modulated by the rise in body temperature (thermal factors), as well as several nonthermal factors implicated in the cardiovascular response to exercise (i.e., central command, mechanoreceptors, and metaboreceptors). However, the way these nonthermal factors interact with thermal factors to maintain heat balance remains poorly understood. We therefore used direct calorimetry to quantify the effects of dose-dependent increases in the activation of these nonthermal stimuli on whole body dry and evaporative heat exchange during dynamic exercise. In a randomized crossover design, eight participants performed 45-min cycling at a fixed metabolic heat production (200 W/m2) in warm, dry conditions (30°C, 20% relative humidity) on four separate occasions, differing only in the level of lower-limb compression applied via bilateral thigh cuffs pressurized to 0, 30, 60, or 90 mmHg. This model provoked increments in nonthermal activation while ensuring the heat loss required to balance heat production was matched across trials. At end-exercise, dry heat loss was 2 W/m2 [1, 3] lower per 30-mmHg pressure increment (P = 0.006), whereas evaporative heat loss was elevated 5 W/m2 [3, 7] with each pressure increment (P < 0.001). Body heat storage and esophageal temperature did not differ across conditions (both P ≥ 0.600). Our findings indicate that the nonthermal factors engaged during exercise exert dose-dependent, opposing effects on whole body dry and evaporative heat exchange, which do not significantly alter heat balance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY To maintain heat balance during exercise, humans rely on skin blood flow and sweating to facilitate dry and evaporative heat exchange. These responses are modulated by body temperatures (thermal factors) and several nonthermal factors (e.g., central command, metaboreceptors), although the way thermal and nonthermal factors interact to regulate body temperature is poorly understood. We demonstrate that nonthermal factors exert dose-dependent, opposing effects on dry and evaporative heat loss, without altering heat storage during dynamic exercise.

A century of exercise physiology: concepts that ignited the study of human thermoregulation. Part 2: physiological measurements

In this, the second of four historical reviews on human thermoregulation during exercise, we examine the research techniques developed by our forebears. We emphasise calorimetry and thermometry, and measurements of vasomotor and sudomotor function. Since its first human use (1899), direct calorimetry has provided the foundation for modern respirometric methods for quantifying metabolic rate, and remains the most precise index of whole-body heat exchange and storage. Its alternative, biophysical modelling, relies upon many, often dubious assumptions. Thermometry, used for >300 y to assess deep-body temperatures, provides only an instantaneous snapshot of the thermal status of tissues in contact with any thermometer. Seemingly unbeknownst to some, thermal time delays at some surrogate sites preclude valid measurements during non-steady state conditions. To assess cutaneous blood flow, immersion plethysmography was introduced (1875), followed by strain-gauge plethysmography (1949) and then laser-Doppler velocimetry (1964). Those techniques allow only local flow measurements, which may not reflect whole-body blood flows. Sudomotor function has been estimated from body-mass losses since the 1600s, but using mass losses to assess evaporation rates requires precise measures of non-evaporated sweat, which are rarely obtained. Hygrometric methods provide data for local sweat rates, but not local evaporation rates, and most local sweat rates cannot be extrapolated to reflect whole-body sweating. The objective of these methodological overviews and critiques is to provide a deeper understanding of how modern measurement techniques were developed, their underlying assumptions, and the strengths and weaknesses of the measurements used for humans exercising and working in thermally challenging conditions.

Exercise temperature regulation following a 35-day horizontal bedrest

NEW FINDINGS

What is the central question of this study? Does a 35-day horizontal bedrest impair thermoeffector responses during whole-body submaximal exercise performed in temperate conditions? What is the main finding and its importance? Cardiovascular and muscular deconditioning ensuing from prolonged recumbency seems to augment, at least to a degree, exercise-induced increase in body core temperature, most likely due to an impairment in non-evaporative heat loss. The response is a function of the absolute exercise intensity imposed.

ABSTRACT

We examined the effects of a 35-day horizontal bedrest on thermoregulation during whole-body exercise. Fifteen healthy men were randomly assigned to either a bedrest (BR; n = 10) or a control (CON; n = 5) group. Prior to bedrest, both groups performed 40-min constant-load upright cycling at 30% of their peak workload (W_peak ; PRE). One and 2 days after bedrest, the BR group performed, in a randomised counterbalanced order, two 40-min trials at 30% of (i) the pre-bedrest W_peak (i.e., at a fixed absolute intensity; POST-A) and (ii) the post-bedrest W_peak (i.e., at a fixed relative intensity; POST-R). The CON group conducted only the POST-A trial, at the same time intervals. During the trials, rectal (T_rec ) and skin ( T ¯ _sk ) temperatures, and the forehead sweating rate (SwR) were monitored. In the CON group, no differences were observed between the trials. Bedrest potentiated moderately the T_rec elevation during the latter part of POST-A (∼0.10°C; P ≤ 0.05), but not of POST-R (∼0.04°C; P = 0.11). In both post-bedrest trials, T ¯ _sk was attenuated by ∼1.5-2.0°C throughout (P < 0.01), whereas the forehead SwR was not modulated. T_rec and T ¯ _sk were similar in POST-A and POST-R, yet the forehead SwR was more dependent on the relative workload imposed (P = 0.04). The present findings therefore suggest that the cardiovascular and muscular deconditioning ensuing from a 35-day bedrest may aggravate the exercise-induced increase in body core temperature when working at a given absolute intensity, most likely due to an impairment in non-evaporative heat loss.

Influence of exercise training with thigh compression on heat-loss responses

We investigated the effect of thigh compression, which accelerates activation of central command and muscle metabo- and mechanoreceptors, on the adaptation of sweating and cutaneous vascular responses during exercise heat acclimation. Nine non-heat-acclimated male subjects were acclimated to heat (32 °C and 50% RH) while cycling [50% of maximum oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 m a x )] 60 min/day for 7 days (control group). The experimental group (n = 9) conducted the same training while the proximal thighs were compressed by a cuff at 60 mmHg. V ˙ O 2 m a x , acetylcholine-induced forearm sweating rate (iontophoresis), and mean sweating and cutaneous vascular responses on the forehead, chest, and forearm (SRmean and CVCmean ) during passive heating were evaluated before and after training. Training significantly increased V ˙ O 2 m a x while did not affect acetylcholine-induced sweating rates in either group. Training significantly decreased Tb thresholds for SRmean and CVCmean during passive heating without the alternations of sensitivities in both groups. Although SRmean during passive heating at a given ΔTb was not improved in either group, CVCmean was significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated after exercise training only in experimental group. Our results indicate that thigh cuff compression during exercise heat acclimation does not influence adaptation of the sweating response but attenuate cutaneous vasodilation.

The influence of internal and skin temperatures on active cutaneous vasodilation under different levels of exercise and ambient temperatures in humans

To clarify the influence of internal and skin temperature on the active cutaneous vasodilation during exercise, the body temperature thresholds for the onset of active vasodilation during light or moderate exercise under different ambient temperature conditions were compared. Seven male subjects performed 30 min of a cycling exercise at 20 % or 50 % of peak oxygen uptake in a room maintained at 20, 24, or 28 °C. Esophageal (Tes) and mean skin temperature (Tsk) as measured by a thermocouple, deep thigh temperature (Tdt) by the zero-heat-flow (ZHF) method, and forearm skin blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF) were monitored. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was also monitored non-invasively, and the cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated as the LDF/MAP. Throughout the experiment, the Tsk at ambient temperatures of 20, 24, and 28 °C were approximately 30, 32, and 34 °C, respectively, for both 20 % and 50 % exercise. During 50 % exercise, the Tes or Tdt thresholds for the onset of the increase in CVC were observed to be similar among the 20, 24, and 28 °C ambient conditions. During 20 % exercise, the increase in Tes and Tdt was significantly lower than those found at 50 %, and the onset of the increase in CVC was only observed at 28 °C. These results suggest that the onset of active vasodilation was affected more strongly by the internal or exercising tissue temperatures than by the skin temperatures during exercise performed at a moderate load in comparison to a light load under Tsk variations ranging from 30 °C to 34 °C. Therefore, the modification by skin temperature of the central control on cutaneous vasomotor tone during exercise may differ between different exercise loads.

Relationship between mean body temperature calculated by two- or three-compartment models and active cutaneous vasodilation in humans: a comparison between cool and warm environments during leg exercise

The aim of this study was to assess whether the three-compartment model of mean body temperature (Tb3) calculated from the esophageal temperature (Tes), temperature in deep tissue of exercising muscle (Tdt), and mean skin temperature (Tsk) has the potential to provide a better match with the thermoregulatory responses than the two-component model of mean body temperature (Tb2) calculated from Tes and Tsk. Seven male subjects performed 40 min of a prolonged cycling exercise at 30% maximal oxygen uptake at 21°C or 31°C (50% relative humidity). Throughout the experiment, Tsk, Tb2, Tb3, and Tdt were significantly (P < 0.01) lower at 21°C than at 31°C temperature conditions, while Tes was similar under both conditions. During exercise, an increase in cutaneous vascular conductance (skin blood flow / mean arterial pressure) over the chest (%CVCc) was observed at both 21°C and 31°C, while no increase was observed at the forearm at 21°C. Furthermore, the Tb3 and Tdt threshold for the onset of the increase in %CVCc was similar, but the Tes and Tb2 threshold differed significantly (P < 0.05) between the conditions tested. These results suggest that active cutaneous vasodilation at the chest is related more closely to Tb3 or Tdt than that measured by Tes or Tb2 calculated by Tes and Tsk during exercise at both 21°C and 31°C.

Non-thermal modification of heat-loss responses during exercise in humans

This review focuses on the characteristics of heat-loss responses during exercise with respect to non-thermal factors. In addition, the effects of physical training on non-thermal heat-loss responses are discussed. When a subject is already sweating the sweating rate increases at the onset of dynamic exercise without changes in core temperature, while cutaneous vascular conductance (skin blood flow) is temporarily decreased. Although exercise per se does not affect the threshold for the onset of sweating, it is possible that an increase in exercise intensity induces a higher sensitivity of the sweating response. Exercise increases the threshold for cutaneous vasodilation, and at higher exercise intensities, the sensitivity of the skin-blood-flow response decreases. Facilitation of the sweating response with increased exercise intensity may be due to central command, peripheral reflexes in the exercising muscle, and mental stimuli, whereas the attenuation of skin-blood-flow responses with decreased cutaneous vasodilation is related to many non-thermal factors. Most non-thermal factors have negative effects on magnitude of cutaneous vasodilation; however, several of these factors have positive effects on the sweating response. Moreover, thermal and non-thermal factors interact in controlling heat-loss responses, with non-thermal factors having a greater impact until core temperature elevations become significant, after which core temperature primarily would control heat loss. Finally, as with thermally induced sweating responses, physical training seems to also affect sweating responses governed by non-thermal factors.

Mechanisms and controllers of eccrine sweating in humans

Human body temperature is regulated within a very narrow range. When exposed to hyperthermic conditions, via environmental factors and/or increased metabolism, heat dissipation becomes vital for survival. In humans, the primary mechanism of heat dissipation, particularly when ambient temperature is higher than skin temperature, is evaporative heat loss secondary to sweat secretion from eccrine glands. While the primary controller of sweating is the integration between internal and skin temperatures, a number of non-thermal factors modulate the sweating response. In addition to summarizing the current understanding of the neural pathways from the brain to the sweat gland, as well as responses at the sweat gland, this review will highlight findings pertaining to studies of proposed non-thermal modifiers of sweating, namely, exercise, baroreceptor loading state, and body fluid status. Information from these studies not only provides important insight pertaining to the basic mechanisms of sweating, but also perhaps could be useful towards a greater understanding of potential mechanisms and consequences of disease states as well as aging in altering sweating responses and thus temperature regulation.

The influence of acute and 23 days of intermittent hypoxic exposures on the exercise-induced forehead sweating response

The effect of acute and 23 days of intermittent exposures to normobaric hypoxia on the forehead sweating response during steady-state exercise was investigated. Eight endurance athletes slept in a normobaric hypoxic room for a minimum of 8 h per day at a simulated altitude equivalent to 2,700 m for 23 days (sleep high-train low regimen). Peak oxygen uptake (VO2(peak)) and peak work rate (WR(peak)) were determined under normoxic (20.9%O(2)) and hypoxic (13.5%O(2)) conditions prior to (pre-IHE), and immediately after (post-IHE) the intermittent hypoxic exposures (IHE). Also, each subject performed three 30-min cycle-ergometry bouts: (1) normoxic exercise at 50% WR(peak) attained in normoxia (control trial; CT); (2) hypoxic exercise at 50% WR(peak) attained in hypoxia (hypoxic relative trial; HRT) and (3) hypoxic exercise at the same absolute work rate as in CT (hypoxic absolute trial; HAT). Exposure to hypoxia induced a 33 and 37% decrease (P < 0.001) in (VO2(peak)) pre-IHE and post-IHE, respectively. Despite similar relative oxygen uptake during HAT pre-IHE and post-IHE, the ratings of perceived whole-body exertion decreased substantially (P < 0.05) post-IHE. Pre-IHE the sweat secretion on the forehead (m(sw)f) was greater (P < 0.01) in the HAT (2.60 (0.80) mg cm(-2) min(-1)) compared to the other two trials (CT = 1.87 (1.09) mg cm(-2) min(-1); HRT = 1.57 (0.82) mg cm(-2) min(-1)) despite a similar exercise-induced elevation in body temperatures, resulting in an augmented (P < 0.01) gain of the sweating response (m(sw)f/Delta T(re)). The augmented (m(sw)f) and m(sw)f/Delta T(re) during the HAT were no longer evident post-IHE. Thus, it appears that exercise sweating on the forehead is potentiated by acute exposure to hypoxia, an effect which can be abolished by 23 days of intermittent hypoxic exposures.

Contribution of thermal and nonthermal factors to the regulation of body temperature in humans

The set point has been used to define the regulated level of body temperature, suggesting that displacements of core temperature from the set point initiate heat production (HP) and heat loss (HL) responses. Human and animal experiments have demonstrated that the responses of sweating and shivering do not coincide at a set point but rather establish a thermoeffector threshold zone. Neurophysiological studies have demonstrated that the sensor-to-effector pathways for HP and HL overlap and, in fact, mutually inhibit each other. This reciprocal inhibition theory, presumably reflecting the manner in which thermal factors contribute to homeothermy in humans, does not incorporate the effect of nonthermal factors on temperature regulation. The present review examines the actions of these nonthermal factors within the context of neuronal models of temperature regulation, suggesting that examination of these factors may provide further insights into the nature of temperature regulation. It is concluded that, although there is no evidence to doubt the existence of the HP and HL pathways reciprocally inhibiting one another, it appears that such a mechanism is of little consequence when comparing the effects of nonthermal factors on the thermoregulatory system, since most of these factors seem to exert their influence in the region after the reciprocal cross-inhibition. At any given moment, both thermal and several nonthermal factors will be acting on the thermoregulatory system. It may, therefore, not be appropriate to dismiss the contribution of either when discussing the regulation of body temperature in humans.