Mechanisms of protection against pulmonary hyperbaric O(2) toxicity by intermittent air breaks

COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated with Hyperbaric Oxygen: Interim Safety Report from a Randomized Clinical Trial (COVID-19-HBO)

BACKGROUND

A few prospective trials and case series have suggested that hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may be efficacious for the treatment of severe COVID-19, but safety is a concern for critically ill patients. We present an interim analysis of the safety of HBOT via a randomized controlled trial (COVID-19-HBO).

METHODS

A randomized controlled, open-label, clinical trial was conducted in compliance with good clinical practice to explore the safety and efficacy of HBOT for severe COVID-19 in critically ill patients with moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Between 3 June 2020, and 17 May 2021, 31 patients with severe COVID-19 and moderate-to-severe ARDS, a ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen (PaO₂/FiO₂) < 26.7 kPa (200 mmHg), and at least two defined risk factors for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or mortality were enrolled in the trial and randomized 1:1 to best practice, or HBOT in addition to best practice. The subjects allocated to HBOT received a maximum of five treatments at 2.4 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for 80 min over seven days. The subjects were followed up for 30 days. The safety endpoints were analyzed.

RESULTS

Adverse events (AEs) were common. Hypoxia was the most common adverse event reported. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups. Numerically, serious adverse events (SAEs) and barotrauma were more frequent in the control group, and the differences between groups were in favor of the HBOT in PaO₂/FiO₂ (PFI) and the national early warning score (NEWS); statistically, however, the differences were not significant at day 7, and no difference was observed for the total oxygen burden and cumulative pulmonary oxygen toxicity dose (CPTD).

CONCLUSION

HBOT appears to be safe as an intervention for critically ill patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS induced by COVID-19.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04327505 (31 March 2020) and EudraCT 2020-001349-37 (24 April 2020).

Pulmonary Oxygen Toxicity Through Exhaled Breath Markers After Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment Table 6

Introduction: The hyperbaric oxygen treatment table 6 (TT6) is widely used to manage dysbaric illnesses in divers and iatrogenic gas emboli in patients after surgery and other interventional procedures. These treatment tables can have adverse effects, such as pulmonary oxygen toxicity (POT). It is caused by reactive oxygen species’ damaging effect in lung tissue and is often experienced after multiple days of therapy. The subclinical pulmonary effects have not been determined. The primary aim of this study was to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath, indicative of subclinical POT after a TT6. Since the exposure would be limited, the secondary aim of this study was to determine whether these VOCs decreased to baseline levels within a few hours.

Methods: Fourteen healthy, non-smoking volunteers from the Royal Netherlands Navy underwent a TT6 at the Amsterdam University Medical Center—location AMC. Breath samples for GC-MS analysis were collected before the TT6 and 30 min, 2 and 4 h after finishing. The concentrations of ions before and after exposure were compared by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. The VOCs were identified by comparing the chromatograms with the NIST library. Compound intensities over time were tested using Friedman tests, with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Bonferroni corrections used for post hoc analyses.

Results: Univariate analyses identified 11 compounds. Five compounds, isoprene, decane, nonane, nonanal and dodecane, showed significant changes after the Friedman test. Isoprene demonstrated a significant increase at 30 min after exposure and a subsequent decrease at 2 h. Other compounds remained constant, but declined significantly 4 h after exposure.

Discussion and Conclusion: The identified VOCs consisted mainly of (methyl) alkanes, which may be generated by peroxidation of cell membranes. Other compounds may be linked to inflammatory processes, oxidative stress responses or cellular metabolism. The hypothesis, that exhaled VOCs would increase after hyperbaric exposure as an indicator of subclinical POT, was not fulfilled, except for isoprene. Hence, no evident signs of POT or subclinical pulmonary damage were detected after a TT6. Further studies on individuals recently exposed to pulmonary irritants, such as divers and individuals exposed to other hyperbaric treatment regimens, are needed.

Can hyperbaric oxygen safely serve as an anti-inflammatory treatment for COVID-19?

INTRODUCTION

SARS-CoV-2 affects part of the innate immune response and activates an inflammatory cascade stimulating the release of cytokines and chemokines, particularly within the lung. Indeed, the inflammatory response during COVID-19 is likely the cause for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Patients with mild symptoms also show significant changes on pulmonary CT-scan suggestive of severe inflammatory involvement.

HYPOTHESIS

The overall hypothesis is that HBO2 is safe and reduces the inflammatory response in COVID-19 pneumonitis by attenuation of the innate immune system, increase hypoxia tolerance and thereby prevent organ failure and reduce mortality.

EVALUATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS

HBO2 is used in clinical practice to treat inflammatory conditions but has not been scientifically evaluated for COVID-19. Experimental and empirical data suggests that HBO2 may reduce inflammatory response in COVID-19. However, there are concerns regarding pulmonary safety in patients with pre-existing viral pneumonitis.

EMPIRICAL DATA

Anecdotes from "compassionate use" and two published case reports show promising results.

CONSEQUENCES OF THE HYPOTHESIS AND DISCUSSION

Small prospective clinical trials are on the way and we are conducting a randomized clinical trial.

Intermittent hyperbaric oxygen exposure mobilizing peroxiredoxin 6 to prevent oxygen toxicity

Intermittent hyperbaric oxygen exposure (IE-HBO) can protect the body against oxygen toxicity, but the underlying mechanisms are not very clear. Peroxiredoxin 6 (Prdx6) is a special endogenous antioxidative protein. We explored if the protective effects of IE-HBO are related to Prdx6. Mice were exposed to 280 kPa O2 for 60 min, followed by 30-min exposure to 20% O2/N2 mixture with equal pressure, repeated for six cycles. The Prdx6 protein level and non-selenium glutathione peroxidase (NSGPx) activity in the brain and lungs were then measured and the injury degree of lung and the oxidation level of brain and lung were evaluated. On this basis, the relationship between Prdx6 and IE-HBO's protection was explored. Generally, both IE-HBO and continuous exposure to HBO (CE-HBO) could increase the protein and mRNA levels of Prdx6, and such increases were more significant 24 h after cessation of exposure; moreover, the Prdx6 level of IE-HBO was higher than that of CE-HBO in both brain and lung, also more significantly 24 h after cessation of exposure. In addition, IE-HBO exposure could more effectively potentiate the activity of NSGPx and increase GSH content in brain and lung tissues. At the same time, it could reduce oxidation products in these tissues. IE-HBO could also provide protection for the lungs against injuries resulting from prolonged HBO exposure. These data showed that IE-HBO can potentiate the production and the activity of Prdx6 and consequently mitigate oxidative damages in brain and lungs. The influences of IE-HBO on Prdx6 may form an important basis for its protection against oxygen toxicity.

Oxygen environment and islet size are the primary limiting factors of isolated pancreatic islet survival

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes is an autoimmune disease that destroys insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas. Pancreatic islet transplantation could be an effective treatment option for type 1 diabetes once several issues are resolved, including donor shortage, prevention of islet necrosis and loss in pre- and post-transplantation, and optimization of immunosuppression. This study seeks to determine the cause of necrotic loss of isolated islets to improve transplant efficiency.

METHODOLOGY

The oxygen tension inside isolated human islets of different sizes was simulated under varying oxygen environments using a computational in silico model. In vitro human islet viability was also assessed after culturing in different oxygen conditions. Correlation between simulation data and experimentally measured islet viability was examined. Using these in vitro viability data of human islets, the effect of islet diameter and oxygen tension of the culture environment on islet viability was also analyzed using a logistic regression model.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Computational simulation clearly revealed the oxygen gradient inside the islet structure. We found that oxygen tension in the islet core was greatly lower (hypoxic) than that on the islet surface due to the oxygen consumption by the cells. The hypoxic core was expanded in the larger islets or in lower oxygen cultures. These findings were consistent with results from in vitro islet viability assays that measured central necrosis in the islet core, indicating that hypoxia is one of the major causes of central necrosis. The logistic regression analysis revealed a negative effect of large islet and low oxygen culture on islet survival.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Hypoxic core conditions, induced by the oxygen gradient inside islets, contribute to the development of central necrosis of human isolated islets. Supplying sufficient oxygen during culture could be an effective and reasonable method to maintain isolated islets viable.

Hyperbaric oxygen in chronic traumatic brain injury: oxygen, pressure, and gene therapy

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a treatment for wounds in any location and of any duration that has been misunderstood for 353 years. Since 2008 it has been applied to the persistent post-concussion syndrome of mild traumatic brain injury by civilian and later military researchers with apparent conflicting results. The civilian studies are positive and the military-funded studies are a mixture of misinterpreted positive data, indeterminate data, and negative data. This has confused the medical, academic, and lay communities. The source of the confusion is a fundamental misunderstanding of the definition, principles, and mechanisms of action of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. This article argues that the traditional definition of hyperbaric oxygen therapy is arbitrary. The article establishes a scientific definition of hyperbaric oxygen therapy as a wound-healing therapy of combined increased atmospheric pressure and pressure of oxygen over ambient atmospheric pressure and pressure of oxygen whose main mechanisms of action are gene-mediated. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy exerts its wound-healing effects by expression and suppression of thousands of genes. The dominant gene actions are upregulation of trophic and anti-inflammatory genes and down-regulation of pro-inflammatory and apoptotic genes. The combination of genes affected depends on the different combinations of total pressure and pressure of oxygen. Understanding that hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a pressure and oxygen dose-dependent gene therapy allows for reconciliation of the conflicting TBI study results as outcomes of different doses of pressure and oxygen.