Effects of β2-adrenergic stimulation on exercise capacity in normal subjects

The beta2 -adrenergic receptor - a re-emerging target to combat obesity and induce leanness?

Treatment of obesity with repurposed or novel drugs is an expanding research field. One approach is to target beta₂ -adrenergic receptors because they regulate the metabolism and phenotype of adipose and skeletal muscle tissue. Several observations support a role for the beta₂ -adrenergic receptor in obesity. Specific human beta₂ -adrenergic receptor polymorphisms are associated with body composition and obesity, for which the Gln27Glu polymorphism is associated with obesity, while the Arg16Gly polymorphism is associated with lean mass in men and the development of obesity in specific populations. Individuals with obesity also have lower abundance of beta₂ -adrenergic receptors in adipose tissue and are less sensitive to catecholamines. In addition, studies in livestock and rodents demonstrate that selective beta₂ -agonists induce a so-called 'repartitioning effect' characterized by muscle accretion and reduced fat deposition. In humans, beta₂ -agonists dose-dependently increase resting metabolic rate by 10-50%. And like that observed in other mammals, only a few weeks of treatment with beta₂ -agonists increases muscle mass and reduces fat mass in young healthy individuals. Beta₂ -agonists also exert beneficial effects on body composition when used concomitantly with training and act additively to increase muscle strength and mass during periods with resistance training. Thus, the beta₂ -adrenergic receptor seems like an attractive target in the development of anti-obesity drugs. However, future studies need to verify the long-term efficacy and safety of beta₂ -agonists in individuals with obesity, particularly in those with comorbidities.

Safety of bronchodilator reversibility test in elderly subjects: a prospective study

Introduction

The reversibility test measures an increase in ventilation parameters after the administration of 400 mg of a short-acting β-agonist (SABA). It is worth noting that a typical dosage, applied as a rescue medicine for bronchospastic dyspnoea, is significantly less, i.e., 100–200 mg.

Aim

To assess the effects of inhaled 400 mg fenoterol (in the bronchodilator reversibility test) on the heart rate and the development of tachyarrhythmias in subjects aged 65 and above.

Material and methods

A total of 53 subjects (45 women) aged 77; 68–82 (median; interquartile range) in stable clinical condition were included in the study. Data including medical history, physical examinations, blood biochemistry, chest X-ray, 12-lead electrocardiogram, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring, bronchodilator test, and echocardiography were obtained. During the Holter ECG monitoring, the bronchodilator test using 400 mg fenoterol (Berotec pMDI) was performed.

Results

A slight but statistically significant (p = 0.02) increase in heart rate from 71 to 75 per min (median) was noted after the administration of fenoterol. No statistically significant differences were found in the number of extrasystolic beats of either supraventricular (p = 0.42) or ventricular origin (p = 0.50). In addition, the subjects did not show any potentially dangerous arrhythmias or significant signs of coronary artery disease. However, there was a significant increase in the number of supraventricular beats in the subjects who were not taking β-blockers.

Conclusions

The use of 400 mg fenoterol in a bronchodilator reversibility test in elderly subjects does not entail any significant cardiovascular risk.

Aerobic performance among healthy (non-asthmatic) adults using beta2-agonists: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of beta2-agonists on aerobic performance in healthy, non-asthmatic study participants.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science) for randomised controlled trials published until December 2019. Studies examining the effect of beta2-agonists on maximal physical performance lasting longer than 1 min were included in the meta-analysis. Data are presented as standardised difference in mean (SDM) with 95% CI.

RESULTS

The present meta-analysis includes 47 studies. The studies comprise 607 participants in cross-over trials, including 99 participants in three-way cross-over trials and 27 participants in a four-way cross-over trial. Seventy-three participants were included in parallel trials. Beta2-agonists did not affect aerobic performance compared with placebo (SDM 0.051, 95% CI -0.020 to 0.122). The SDM for the included studies was not heterogeneous (I²=0%, p=0.893), and the effect was not related to type of beta2-agonist, dose, administration route, duration of treatment or performance level of participants. Beta2-agonists had no effect on time trial performance, time to exhaustion or maximal oxygen consumption (p<0.218).

CONCLUSION/IMPLICATION

The present study shows that beta2-agonists do not affect aerobic performance in non-asthmatic subjects regardless of type, dose, administration route, duration of treatment or performance level of participants. The results of the present study should be of interest to WADA and to anyone who is interested in equal opportunities in competitive sports.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018109223.

Can β2-agonists have an ergogenic effect on strength, sprint or power performance? Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the effect of β2-agonists on anaerobic performance in healthy non-asthmatic subjects.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science) for randomised controlled trials, published until December 2019, examining the effect of β2-agonists on maximal physical performance lasting 1 min or shorter. Data are presented as standardised difference in mean (SDM) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

34 studies were included in the present meta-analysis. The studies include 44 different randomised and placebo-controlled comparisons with β2-agonists comprising 323 participants in crossover trials, and 149 participants in parallel trials. In the overall analyses, β2-agonists improved anaerobic performance by 5% (SDM 0.29, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.42), but the effect was related to dose and administration route. In a stratified analysis, the SDM was 0.14 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.28) for approved β2-agonists and 0.46 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.68) for prohibited β2-agonists, respectively. Furthermore, SDM was 0.16 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.30) for inhaled administration and 0.51 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.77) for oral administration, respectively, and 0.20 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.33) for acute treatment and 0.50 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.80) for treatment for multiple weeks. Analyses stratified for the type of performance showed that strength (0.35, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.55) and sprint (0.17, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.29) performance were improved by β2-agonists.

CONCLUSION/IMPLICATION

Our study shows that non-asthmatic subjects can improve sprint and strength performance by using β2-agonists. It is uncertain, however, whether World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-approved doses of β2-agonists improve performance. Our results support that the use of β2-agonists should be controlled and restricted to athletes with documented asthma.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42018109223.

Acute effects of salbutamol on systemic vascular function in people with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthmatics are at increased cardiovascular disease risk, which has been linked to beta2(β₂)-agonist use. Inhalation of β₂-agonists increases sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in healthy individuals, however the systemic impact of salbutamol in asthmatics using β₂-agonists regularly is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the systemic vascular responses to a clinical dose of salbutamol (Phase I) and following an acute increase in SNA (Phase II) in asthmatics and controls.

METHODS

Fourteen controls and 14 asthmatics were recruited for Phase I. On separate days, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and peripheral arterial stiffness (pPWV) were evaluated at baseline and following either 400 μg inhaled salbutamol or a placebo inhaler. For Phase II, heart rate, blood pressure, vascular conductance, pPWV, and central (c)PWV were evaluated in response to a large increase in SNA brought on by cold-water hand immersion (i.e. cold-pressor test) or body-temperature water hand immersion (i.e. control) in 10 controls and 10 asthmatics.

RESULTS

Following salbutamol, asthmatics demonstrated reduced FMD (-3.0%, p < 0.05) and increased pPWV (+0.7 m/s, p < 0.05); however, salbutamol had no effect in controls. The cold-pressor test resulted in similar increases in blood pressure, vascular flow rates and conductance, pPWV, and cPWV in both asthmatics and controls, suggesting similar neurovascular transduction in asthmatics and controls.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled Salbutamol leads to increased arterial stiffness and reduced FMD in asthmatics. As asthmatics and controls had similar vascular responses to an increase in SNA, these findings suggest asthmatics have heightened sympathetic responses to β₂-agonists which may contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk in asthma.

Exercise performance after salbutamol inhalation in non-asthmatic, non-athlete individuals: a randomised, controlled, cross-over trial

Background

Asthma is a frequent diagnosis in competitive sports, and inhaled β₂-agonists are commonly used by athletes. Although inhaled β₂-agonists do not seem to improve performance in athletes, it has remained uncertain whether they can increase exercise performance in non-athletes.

Objective

To investigate the effect of inhaled β₂-agonists on exercise performance in healthy non-athlete individuals.

Methods

In a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial, healthy, non-asthmatic, non-athlete individuals were randomised to inhalation of either 900 µg of salbutamol or placebo. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, dynamic spirometry and impulse oscillometry were performed. The primary outcome was the effect from salbutamol on peak oxygen uptake, whereas secondary outcomes were breathing reserve and ventilation efficiency, and workload, heart rate, breath rate and minute ventilation at peak exercise under influence of salbutamol.

Results

A total of 36 healthy subjects with a mean age of 26±5 years were included. Salbutamol had no effect on peak oxygen uptake compared with placebo, 46.8±1.3 mL/kg/min versus 46.6±1.2 mL/kg/min, p=0.64. Salbutamol had no effect on workload, p=0.20, heart rate, p=0.23, breath rate, p=0.10, or minute ventilation, p=0.26, at peak exercise compared with placebo. Salbutamol lowered oxygen uptake, p=0.04, and workload, p=0.04, at anaerobic threshold compared with placebo. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 116%±13% of predicted, and peak expiratory flow, 122%±16% of predicted, increased after inhalation of salbutamol compared with placebo; 109%±13% and 117%±17%, respectively, p<0.01. Breathing reserve was found to be higher, 22%±2%, after salbutamol inhalation than after placebo, 16%±2%, p<0.01.

Conclusion

Inhaled salbutamol did not improve peak oxygen uptake in healthy, non-asthmatic, non-athlete individuals compared with placebo.

Trial registration number

NCT02914652.

Exenatide improves diastolic function and attenuates arterial stiffness but does not alter exercise capacity in individuals with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Exercise is recommended as a cornerstone of treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), however, it is often poorly adopted by patients. Even in the absence of apparent cardiovascular disease, persons with T2DM have an impaired ability to carry out maximal and submaximal exercise and these impairments are correlated with cardiac and endothelial dysfunction. Glucagon-like pepetide-1 (GLP-1) augments endothelial and cardiac function in T2DM. We hypothesized that administration of a GLP-1 agonist (exenatide) would improve exercise capacity in T2DM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three participants (64±4years; mean±SE) with uncomplicated T2DM were randomized in a double-blinded manner to receive either 10μg BID of exenatide or matching placebo after baseline measurements. Treatment with exenatide did not improve VO_2peak (P=0.1464) or VO₂ kinetics (P=0.2775). Diastolic function, assessed via resting lateral E:E', was improved with administration of exenatide compared with placebo (Placebo Pre: 7.6±1.0 vs. Post: 8.4±1.2 vs. Exenatide Pre: 8.1±0.7 vs. Post: 6.7±0.6; P=0.0127). Additionally, arterial stiffness measured by pulse wave velocity, was reduced with exenatide treatment compared with placebo (Placebo Pre: 10.5±0.8 vs. Post: 11.5±1.1s vs. Exenatide Pre: 11.4±1.8 vs. Post: 10.2±1.4s; P=0.0373). Exenatide treatment did not improve endothelial function (P=0.1793).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of exenatide improved cardiac function and reduced arterial stiffness, however, these changes were not accompanied by improved functional exercise capacity. In order to realize the benefits of this drug on exercise capacity, combining exenatide with aerobic exercise training in participants with T2DM may be warranted.

Short-term cardiovascular and autonomic effects of inhaled salbutamol

Asthma independently increases the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. As inhaled β-agonists have systemic cardiovascular effects, and elevations in arterial stiffness and sympathetic nerve activity are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity/mortality, this study examines the effect of salbutamol use on pulse wave velocity (PWV) and muscle sympathetic nervous activity (MSNA). Healthy men and women (26.2±1.5years) were recruited for: Day 1: 4 inhalations of placebo followed by 4 inhalations of salbutamol (4×100μg); Day 2: placebo only; Day 3: carotid-femoral PWV measurements before/after placebo/salbutamol. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and carotid-radial PWV were obtained on Day 1 and 2. MSNA was obtained on Day 1. Salbutamol increased HR and total MSNA (Baseline1: 2.8±2.8au; Placebo: 2.4±2.1au; Baseline2: 2.7±3.0au; Salbutamol: 3.3±2.9au; p=0.05), with no changes in MAP or PWV. There were no effects of placebo on HR, MSNA, or PWV. Acute salbutamol use increases sympathetic activity suggesting that salbutamol could contribute to cardiovascular morbidity/mortality in individuals using inhaled β-agonists.

Combined inhalation of beta2 -agonists improves swim ergometer sprint performance but not high-intensity swim performance

There is a high prevalence of asthma and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in elite athletes, which leads to a major use of beta2 -agonists. In a randomized double-blinded crossover study, we investigated the effects of combined inhalation of beta2 -agonists (salbutamol, formoterol, and salmeterol), in permitted doses within the World Anti-Doping Agency 2013 prohibited list, in elite swimmers with (AHR, n = 13) or without (non-AHR, n = 17) AHR. Maximal voluntary isometric contraction of m. quadriceps (MVC), sprint performance on a swim ergometer and performance in an exhaustive swim test at 110% of VO2max were determined. Venous plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) were measured post-exercise. No improvement was observed in the exhaustive swim test, but swim ergometer sprint time was improved (P < 0.05) in both groups from 57 ± 1.7 to 56 ± 1.8 s in AHR and 58.3 ± 1 to 57.4 ± 1 s in non-AHR. MVC and post-exercise plasma IL-6 increased (P < 0.05) with beta2 -agonists in both groups, whereas IL-8 only increased in AHR. In summary, inhalation of beta2 -agonists, in permitted doses, did not improve swim performance in elite swimmers. However, swim ergometer sprint performance and MVC were increased, which should be considered when making future anti-doping regulations.