Staged surgery with neoadjuvant 90Y-DOTATOC therapy for down-sizing synchronous bilobular hepatic metastases from a neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor

Pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved using combined peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and somatostatin analogs following pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor resection: a case report

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) serves as a novel and effective treatment option for somatostatin receptor-positive unresectable liver metastases of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). However, there are few reported cases of surgical resection for initially unresectable liver metastases of PNET that were converted to resectable after PRRT. Here we report a case where PRRT and somatostatin analogs (SSAs) led to a pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases following PNET resection.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 52-year-old man underwent pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy for PNET at age 40 and subsequent hepatectomies for resectable liver metastases at 44 and 47 years of age. At age 48, a follow-up examination revealed unresectable multiple liver metastases, and PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy was initiated. After four cycles of PRRT, most liver metastases diminished according to imaging studies, and the remaining two hepatic lesions continued to shrink with additional lanreotide. Conversion surgery for liver metastases was successfully performed, revealing no viable tumor cells in tissue specimens. Seventeen months after surgery, imaging showed no detectable residual tumor or recurrence. We present a review of the relevant literature that highlights the significance of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

This rare case highlights the pathological complete response of initially unresectable multiple liver metastases achieved by PRRT and SSAs following PNET resection, suggesting their potential as a multimodality treatment option for unresectable PNET.

Neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Objectives

Neoadjuvant therapy plays an increasingly important role in pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), but the systematic evaluation of its efficacy is still lacking. The purpose of this study is to explore the role of neoadjuvant therapy in pNENs.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literatures published online until October 1, 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted to generate proportion with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for tumor response, resection rate, R0 resection rate and survival time.

Results

Nine studies with 468 patients were involved in the systematic review. None of these patients met complete response (CR). Furthermore, 43.6% (95% CI [18.1, 69.0]) patients were expected to achieve partial response (PR), 51.3% (95% CI [27.9, 78.3]) to stable disease (SD), and 4.3% (95% CI [0.7, 7.9]) to progressive disease (PD). The estimate resection rate and R0 resection rate after neoadjuvant therapy were 68.2% (95% CI [44.5, 91.9]) and 60.2% (95% CI [53.5, 66.9]), respectively. There was no significant difference in resection rate between different chemotherapy regimens (41.67% vs 33.93%, P=0.453), as well as R0 resection rate (62.50% vs 68.30%, P=0.605). In terms of objective response rate (ORR), there was no significant difference between CAPTEM and FAS (41.67% vs 33.93%, P=0.453), while PRRT showed a higher ORR compared with chemotherapy, although there was also no statistical difference (49.06% vs 36.96%, P=0.154).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant therapies could reduce the tumor size and stage of some borderline resectable or unresectable pNENs, and give some patients the chance of radical resection. However, according to the current data, the best treatment regimen for pNENs neoadjuvant therapy is still unknown.

Radioligand therapy (RLT) as neoadjuvant treatment for inoperable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a literature review

In the last 10 years, several literature reports supported radioligand therapy (RLT) in neoadjuvant settings for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Indeed, primary tumor shrinkage has been frequently reported following RLT in unresectable or borderline resectable PanNETs. Moreover, RLT-induced intratumoral modifications facilitate surgery, both on primary tumor and metastasis, having a great impact on progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). However, prospective controlled investigations are necessary to confirm preliminary data and to define the best RLT scheme and the ideal patient that, in a multidisciplinary approach, should be referred to neoadjuvant RLT.

[Liver metastases of neuroendocrine tumors]

Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are very heterogeneous with respect to the clinical presentation and the prognosis. The treatment of NELMs requires a multidisciplinary approach and patients with NELM should be referred to a specialized center. When possible, the resection of NELMs provides the best long-term results. The general selection criteria for liver resection include an acceptable general physical condition for a large liver operation, tumors with a favorable differentiation grade 1 or 2, a lack of extrahepatic lesions, a sufficient residual liver volume and the possibility to resect at least 70% of the metastases. Supplementary treatment, including simultaneous liver ablation, are generally safe and can increase the number of patients who can be considered for surgery. For patients with resectable NELM, the resection of the primary tumor is recommended either in a 2-stage or combined procedure. In selected patients with nonresectable NELM a liver transplantation can be carried out, which can be associated with excellent long-term results.

Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms with Radiolabeled Peptides-Where Are We Now

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been one of the most successful and exciting examples of theranostics in nuclear medicine in recent decades and is now firmly embedded in many treatment algorithms for unresectable or metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) worldwide. It is widely considered to be an effective treatment for well- or moderately differentiated neoplasms, which express high levels of somatostatin receptors that can be selectively targeted. This review article outlines the scientific basis of PRRT in treatment of NENs and describes its discovery dating back to the early 1990s. Early treatments utilizing Indium-111, a γ-emitter, showed promise in reduction in tumor size and improvement in biochemistry, but were also met with high radiation doses and myelotoxic and nephrotoxic effects. Subsequently, stable conjugation of DOTA-peptides with β-emitting radionuclides, such as Yttrium-90 and Lutetium-177, served as a breakthrough for PRRT and studies highlighted their potential in eliciting progression-free survival and quality of life benefits. This article will also elaborate on the key trials which paved the way for its approval and will discuss therapeutic considerations, such as patient selection and administration technique, to optimize its use.

What Are the Place and Modalities of Surgical Management for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms? A Narrative Review

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors derived from cells with neuroendocrine differentiation. They are considered malignant by default. However, their outcomes are variable depending on their presentation in the onset of hereditary syndromes, hormonal secretion, grading, and extension. Therefore, although surgical treatment has long been suggested as the only treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms, its modalities are an evolving landscape. For selected patients (small, localized, non-functional panNENs), a "wait and see" strategy is suggested, as it is in the setting of multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type 1, but the accurate size cut-off remains to be established. Parenchyma-sparring pancreatectomy, aiming to limit pancreatic insufficiency, are also emerging procedures, which place beyond the treatment of insulinomas and small non-functional panNENs (in association with lymph node picking) remains to be clarified. Furthermore, giving the fact that the liver is generally the only metastatic site, surgery keeps a place of choice alongside medical therapies in the treatment of metastatic disease, but its modalities and extensions are still a matter of debate. This narrative review aims to describe the current recommended surgical management for pancreatic NENs and controversies in light of the actual recommendations and recent literature.

Value of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment in the Management of Primary Inoperable Neuroendocrine Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Neuroendocrine neoplasms including neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are often diagnosed as primary disseminated or inoperable. In those cases, systemic extensive therapy is necessary, but radical treatment is unlikely. As described in the literature, in some selected cases, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) may be used as a first-line/neoadjuvant therapy that allows further successful surgery. Such treatment may enable a reduction of total tumor burden or allow a radical treatment which improves the final outcomes.

AIM

This study aims to assess whether neoadjuvant PRRT could be a treatment option for patients with initially unresectable NETs.

METHODS

Among the group of 114 patients treated with PRRT between the years 2005 and 2020, in 32 cases, it was the first-line therapy, mainly due to massive disease burden at the time of diagnosis. Among them, nine patients received PRRT as the first-line treatment due to the primary inoperable tumors with the intention of preoperative reduction of the tumor size in order to allow for a surgical treatment.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant PRRT enabled surgery in four out of nine (45%) patients. Finally, in two out of four cases, the goal (radical surgery) has been achieved.

CONCLUSION

PRRT may be considered not only as a palliative but also as a neoadjuvant therapy in advanced, somatostatin-positive NETs that were initially inoperable.

Surgical Feasibility, Determinants, and Overall Efficacy of Neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT for Locally Advanced Unresectable Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

We assessed 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in the neoadjuvant setting in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). We also evaluated the variables associated with resectability of the primary tumor after PRRT. Methods: This study included 57 GEP-NET patients who had a primary tumor that was unresectable (because of vascular involvement as defined using the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma criteria of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network) and who underwent 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy without any prior surgery. They were categorized into 2 groups: 23 patients without liver metastases (group 1) and 34 patients with potentially resectable liver metastases (group 2). 177Lu-DOTATATE was administered with mixed amino acid-based renal protection at a dose of 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) per cycle. Surgical resectability was evaluated using triphasic contrast-enhanced abdominal CT imaging at 3 different time points during the PRRT course. Four broad categories of overall PRRT response were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Associations between variables and a resectable primary tumor after PRRT were analyzed using the χ2 test, with a P value of less than 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: After 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy, the unresectable primary tumor became resectable in 15 of 57 (26.3%) patients (7 patients in group 1 and 8 patients in group 2). A complete or partial response to PRRT was seen in 48 patients (84%), 23 patients (40%), 18 patients (31%), and 23 patients (40%) using symptomatic, biochemical, molecular imaging, and anatomic imaging criteria, respectively. Estimated rates of PFS were 95% and 90% at 2 y in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The 2-y OS of the 2 groups combined was 92.1%. The rate at which the primary tumor was resectable after PRRT was significantly higher in patients who had duodenal neuroendocrine tumors, patients who had GEP-NETs with no regional lymph node involvement, patients for whom the primary tumor was smaller than 5 cm, patients for whom liver metastases were no larger than 1.5 cm, patients for whom there were no more than 3 liver metastases, and patients for whom 18F-FDG uptake in the primary tumor had an SUVmax of less than 5. Conclusion: In a moderate fraction of GEP-NET patients, with or without liver metastases, whose primary tumor was unresectable because of vascular involvement, the primary tumor converted from unresectable to resectable after 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy, signifying that neoadjuvant PRRT can be considered in such patients. The effective control of symptoms, favorable morphologic and functional imaging response, and durable PFS and OS that we observed after 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT may lead to less morbidity and mortality in these patients.

A combination of surgery, theranostics, and liquid biopsy - a personalised oncologic approach to treatment of patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms

Rationale: Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) of small bowel (SBNEN) frequently present with metastatic disease. Theranostics (molecular imaging followed by targeting therapy) allow for personalised medicine. Liquid biopsies enable precise identification of residual disease and real-time monitoring of therapeutic response. Our aim was to determine the clinical utility of a combination of surgery, theranostics, and a multigene blood measurement in metastasised SBNEN. Methods: Inclusion criteria were SBNEN, G1/G2 NEN, initial tumour diagnosis, stage IV NEN, positivity on 68Ga somatostatin analogue PET/CT, eligible for surgery, and 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). Blood samples for NETest were collected longitudinally. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. NETest results were assessed prior to surgery and during clinical follow-up. Results: A surgical cohort of 39 SBNEN patients met eligibility criteria. Thirty-two patients underwent ileal resection and 7 right hemicolectomy. The mean number of 177Lu PRRT cycles was 4. Mortality was nil. Surgical morbidity was 10.3%. Transient grade 1/2 toxicity occurred in 41% (PRRT). NETest scores (n=9 patients) decreased in 100% following treatment and correlated with diminished tumour volume and disease stabilization following surgery and PRRT. Median follow-up: 78 months. Median PFS and OS: 42.7 and 110 months, respectively. Progression-free survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years was 79.4%, 57.1% and 40.5%, respectively. Overall survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-years was 97.4%, 97.4%, and 94.1%, respectively. Conclusions: Surgery combined with 177Lu PRRT is safe and provides favourable PFS and OS in selected patients with advanced SBNEN. Liquid biopsy (NETest) has the potential to accurately delineate disease status.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Recent Progresses and Future Approaches

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors, their treatment being challenging and requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Though the only curative treatment is surgery, up to 50% of patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease. In the last years, neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy has become part of the standard of care in the treatment of different cancer types. However, evidence of its efficacy and safety in NEN patients has not yet been confirmed in the literature. The aim of the present review is to perform an extensive review of the scientific evidence for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic NENs.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a two-step strategy for initially unresectable liver disease from neuroendocrine tumors: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

In this study, we describe our experience with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for initially unresectable liver disease as a two-steps therapeutic strategy, first in neoadjuvant intention before surgery and then later on in case of disease relapse.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective evaluation of four cases of unresectable liver metastases of NET of different origins treated with neoadjuvant Lu-177-DotaTATE for conversion into resectability first and as rechallenging treatment after disease relapse.

RESULTS

After treatment with Lu-177-DotaTAE, resectability was reached in three of four cases. In one case, SIRT was additionally performed preoperatively. Relapse occurred in three of four cases after 32, 34, and 37 months, respectively, and was managed with Re-PRRT-treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although more data are needed, our retrospective study suggests that treatment with Lu-177-DotaTATE is an important adjunct to surgery not only in neoadjuvant intention but also for treating disease relapse. A register study might deliver more evidence for supporting this strategy.

Histopathological and Immunophenotypic Changes of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors after Neoadjuvant Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT)

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) is an emerging therapeutic option for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). A possible role for PRRT as a neoadjuvant agent is still largely undetermined, explored only in case reports or small case series. Likewise, the histopathological and immunophenotypic changes induced by PRRT are poorly characterized. In the present study, 24 patients who underwent neoadjuvant PRRT on the basis of their disease's characteristics were retrospectively matched with 24 patients who underwent upfront surgery. A comprehensive morphological and immunohistochemical evaluation was conducted to identify the differences in the two groups. The most significant findings were that the total percentage of stroma increased significantly in patients who underwent PRRT (p < 0.0001) and the characteristics of the stroma were different in the two groups. The somatostatin receptors type 2A (SSTR2A) were retained in most patients (87%) after PRRT. The density of CD163+ M2-polarized macrophages was greater in the PRRT group (p = 0.022), and M2-polarized macrophages tended to assume an epithelioid morphology (p = 0.043). In the neoadjuvant PRRT group, none of the histological parameters considered were associated with progression-free survival (PFS). Neoadjuvant PRRT in PanNETs is associated with reduced tumor diameter, an increased percentage of stroma, preserved SSTR2A expression in most of the cases, and an increased CD163+ M2-polarized macrophages density.

Liver transplantation in the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastasis from neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare neoplasms with generally indolent growth behavior. The liver is the most common site of NET metastasis. The NET metastatic spread to the liver are usually multiple tumors involving bilateral hemilivers. For patients with isolated NET metastasis to the liver, a complete extirpation (R0) resection of both the primary NET and liver metastasis provide the best chance of tumor recurrence-free patient survival. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) presents a viable treatment option for patients with unresectable liver metastasis from NET. Post-OLT outcomes for the patients of NET with liver metastasis (5-year overall survival rate 47-71%) are comparable to those for other indications. However, the high rate of recurrence after OLT (31-57%) remains a clinical obstacle. As such, it is imperative to consider each patient individually and identify prognostic factors that would impact post-OLT outcomes. This article focuses on the role of OLT in the definitive treatment of metastatic liver NET, review patient selection criteria predictive of survival outcomes and post-OLT outcomes for patients.

Response rates in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and implications for future treatment strategies

BACKGROUND

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a targeted therapy used to treat unresectable somatostatin receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of this study was to evaluate response rates among neuroendocrine tumors of different primaries and identify factors relevant to future treatment strategies.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who received peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumors from 2018 to 2019 at our institution. Patients were assessed with computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATATE-positron emission tomography before and after 2 or 4 cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Tumor response was evaluated by RECIST 1.1. Statistics included multinomial logistic regression models and Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients underwent 92 cycles of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: pancreas (n = 11), small bowel (n = 7), and other (n = 9) neuroendocrine tumors. Overall, 30% (8 of 27) had partial response, 59% (16 of 27) stable disease, and 11% (3 of 27) progressed. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors responded differently from small bowel neuroendocrine tumors regardless of cycle number (P = .01). The majority of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (6 of 11) had partial response to peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, while all small bowel neuroendocrine tumors had stable disease. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors stable after 2 cycles were more likely to respond to additional cycles versus other neuroendocrine tumors (probability: 60% vs 11%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may benefit from a full course of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, whereas other neuroendocrine tumors appear less likely to respond. Large prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

[Treatment of colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases: rationale for neoadjuvant therapeutic concepts]

BACKGROUND

Liver metastases represent the most common secondary malignant liver disease. Data regarding the incidence of colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases are rare due to insufficient documentation in a register. Results regarding neoadjuvant therapy are limited and mostly from retrospective analyses.

OBJECTIVE

A summary and rating of the rationale for neoadjuvant therapeutic concepts for colorectal and non-colorectal liver metastases were performed.

MATERIAL UND METHODS

The analysis was based on European and American guidelines and included publications in both German and English languages. The results and recommendations were summarized and a review based on the literature is given.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant treatment of liver metastases is performed with heterogeneous intentions. The selection of biologically favorable tumors as well as the conversion of primarily non-operable into resectable metastases of the liver are classical reasons for neoadjuvant treatment. The rationale for neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal and especially for non-colorectal liver metastases cannot be answered in a consistently coherent way with respect to the current status quo of the literature and guidelines. The creation of treatment strategies in clinical settings follows criteria, such as patterns of metastases, complexity of the resection and biological factors (metachronous/synchronous metastases, prognostic factors).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant treatment in the context of conversion therapy is the standard procedure for metastasized colorectal cancer. The biological selection of favorable tumors as the basis for neoadjuvant treatment of resectable lesions is not a consistently used standard for colorectal cancer. Non-colorectal liver metastases are resected only as part of individual concepts.

The North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Consensus Paper on the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

This manuscript is the result of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus conference on the surgical management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from July 19 to 20, 2018. The group reviewed a series of questions of specific interest to surgeons taking care of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and for each, the available literature was reviewed. What follows are these reviews for each question followed by recommendations of the panel.

The heart matters: a review of incidental cardiac uptake on Ga-68 DOTA peptide PET-CT scans

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and relative significance of incidental cardiac uptake on 68Ga-DOTA-peptide PET-CT scans in patients with neuroendocrine tumours/genetic syndromes expressing somatostatin receptors.

METHODS

Scans of 1463 patients who underwent 68Ga-DOTA-peptide PET-CT scans in our department between 2013 and 2018 were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of uptake in the heart and/or its appendages.

RESULTS

out of 1463 patients (1.3%) demonstrated uptake of radio-peptide in the heart and/or its appendages. In 18 out of these 19 patients, the clinicians were unaware of possible cardiac involvement (one patient was a known case of cardiac paraganglioma). The primary neuroendocrine tumours and genetic syndromes associated with those with cardiac uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-peptide were as follows: unknown primary (n = 7), small bowel (n = 6), colon (n = 2), caecum (n = 1), pancreas (n = 1), cardiac paraganglioma (n = 1), Von Hippel Lindau syndrome (n = 1). Amongst the patients with neuroendocrine tumours, demonstrating cardiac uptake of 68Ga-DOTA-peptide, there was no clear association with carcinoid heart disease.

DISCUSSION

Our results are in agreement with established literature. The exact prognostic implication of cardiac involvement in patients with neuroendocrine tumours as well as other genetic syndromes expressing somatostatin receptors is unknown. We hypothesize that early detection and confirmation of cardiac metastasis(es) in these patients and introduction of different treatment regimes (such as Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy), earlier in the course of the disease would reduce the disease burden on the heart and therefore contribute to better patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Cardiac involvement is a rare and hitherto less well-studied occurrence in neuroendocrine tumours, with an incidence in the range of 1%. To assess the possible prognostic implications, further detailed multicentre studies are required.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours

Background:

The incidence of pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs) has increased considerably in the last few decades. The characteristic features of this tumour and the development of new investigative and therapeutic methods had a great impact on its management.

Objective:

The aim of this review is to investigate the outcome of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy (PRRT) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search strategy was used based on two databases (SCOPUS, and PubMed). We considered all studies published in English, evaluating the use of PRRT (177Luteciuim- DOTA-conjugated peptides and 90Yetrium- DOTA- conjugated peptides) in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours as a standalone entity or as a subgroup within the wider category of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (GEP NETs).

Results:

PRRT was found to be an effective treatment modality as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies in the treatment of non-operable and metastatic pNETs where other options are limited. Complete response was reported to be between 2-6% while partial response was achieved in up to 60% of cases. Survival analysis was also impressive. Progression Free Survival (PFS) reached a mean of 34 months and Overall Survival (OS) of 53 months. PRRT also proved to improve patients’ Quality of Life (QoL). Acute and sub-acute side effects like nephrotoxicity and haematotoxicity are usually mild and reversible.

Conclusion:

PRRT is well tolerated and effective treatment option for non-operable and/or metastatic pNETs. Side effects are usually mild and reversible. Larger randomized controlled trails need to be done to compare PRRT with other treatment modalities and to provide more detailed guidelines regarding patient selections, the choice of PRRT, follow up and response assessment to maximum potential benefit.

Theranostics in neuroendocrine tumours: somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy

Theranostics and its principles: pre-treatment selection of patients who are most likely to benefit from treatment by the use of a related, specific diagnostic test are integral to the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). This is due to NETs' important, but variable, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression, their heterogeneity and variation in site of primary and rate of progression. Only patients whose tumours have sufficient expression of SSTRs will benefit from SSTR-based radionuclide therapy and demonstrating this expression prior to therapy is essential. This article provides a relevant overview of NETs and the multiple facets of SSTR based theranostics, including imaging and therapy radionuclides; clinical efficacy and toxicity; patient selection and treatment and finally emerging radiopharmaceuticals and newer clinical applications.

Preoperative Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Streptozocin for the Treatment of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases

INTRODUCTION

While preoperative chemotherapy is frequently utilized before resection of non-neuroendocrine liver metastases, patients with resectable neuroendocrine liver metastases typically undergo surgery first. FAS is a cytotoxic chemotherapy regimen that is associated with substantial response rates in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

METHODS

All patients who underwent R0/R1 resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases at a single institution between 1998 and 2015 were included. The outcomes of patients treated with preoperative FAS were compared with those of patients who were not.

RESULTS

Of the 67 patients included, 27 (40.3%) received preoperative FAS, whereas 40 (59.7%) did not. Despite being associated with higher rates of synchronous disease, lymph node metastases, and larger tumor size, patients who received preoperative FAS had similar overall survival [overall survival (OS), 108.2 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.0-136.0) vs. 107.0 months (95% CI 78.0-136.0), p = 0.64] and recurrence-free survival [RFS, 25.1 months (95% CI 23.2-27.0) vs. 18.0 months (95% CI 13.8-22.2), p = 0.16] as patients who did not. Among patients who presented with synchronous liver metastases (n = 46), the median OS [97.3 months (95% CI 65.9-128.6) vs. 65.0 months (95% CI 28.1-101.9), p = 0.001] and RFS [24.8 months (95% CI 22.6-26.9) vs. 12.1 months (2.2-22.0), p = 0.003] were significantly greater among patients who received preoperative FAS compared with those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of FAS before liver resection is associated with improved OS compared with surgery alone among patients with advanced synchronous pancreatic neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy and the Treatment of Gastroentero-pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Current Findings and Future Perspectives

Purpose and Methods

Patients with inoperable and metastasized neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), particularly those with grades 1 and 2, usually receive treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has gained momentum over the past two decades in patients who progress on SSAs. 177Lu-DOTATATE is currently the most widely used radiopeptide for PRRT. We reviewed the recent evidence on PRRT and the treatment of gastroentero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

Results

¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE can be used as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with inoperable GEP-NETs, who might be candidate for surgery after treatment and as adjuvant therapy after surgical intervention. Combination treatments of PRRT with chemotherapy or targeted agents as well as combinations of radionuclides in patients with NETs have been explored over the last few years. The majority of patients with NETs experience partial response or have disease stabilization, a small percentage has complete response, while some 30% of patients, however, will have disease progression. The safety and efficacy of retreatment with extra cycles of PRRT as salvage therapy have been evaluated in small retrospective series.

Conclusion

Overall, there is evidence that disease control and quality of life improve significantly after 117Lu PRRT therapy. Clinical trials on this therapy are scarce, and there is a need for further studies to establish proper management guidelines.

Surgical management of neuroendocrine tumor-associated liver metastases: a review

Liver metastasis is common among patients who suffer from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Radical surgery is the standard treatment whenever possible but there is still controversies concerning the treatment strategies such as resection of the primary, role of debulking surgery, liver transplantation (LT) and neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies. This article aims to review the current evidence available, together with some latest updates, focusing on the surgical management.

Neoadjuvant peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and modified multivisceral transplantation for an advanced small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasm: an updated case report

Small intestinal neuroendocrine neoplasms (SI-NEN) frequently metastasise to regional lymph nodes, and surgery is the mainstay of therapy for such patients. However, despite the possible use of advanced surgical techniques, the resection of both primary and locoregional diseases is not always attainable. Intestinal and multivisceral transplantation has been performed in a small number of patients with conventionally nonresectable, slow-growing tumours threatening the mesenteric root but has remained controversial. The use of donor skin in “sentinel flaps” in transplantation theoretically offers advantages in tailoring immunosuppression and monitoring for rejection. We represent (with extended follow-up) the first case of a patient with inoperable extensive mesenteric metastases from SI-NEN, who underwent neoadjuvant peptide receptor radionuclide therapy before a modified multivisceral transplant with a concomitant vascularised sentinel forearm flap. At 48 months after transplantation, our patient remained at full physical activity with no evidence of disease recurrence on either tumour biochemistry or radiological imaging.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15% to 35% of patients. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compare favorably with that for somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, or newer, "targeted" therapies. Prospective, randomized data regarding the potential PFS and OS benefit of PRRT compared with standard therapies is anticipated.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy: focus on bronchial neuroendocrine tumors

Well-differentiated bronchial neuroendocrine tumors (B-NETs) are rare. They represent 1-5 % of all lung cancers. The incidence of these neoplasms has risen over the past 30 years and, especially for advanced or metastatic disease, management is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. Treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is the most important first-line therapy, in particular in well-differentiated NETs with high somatostatin type receptor (SSTR) expression. In these tumors, the role of mammalian target of rapamycin (m-TOR) inhibitors and the potential utility of other target therapies remain unclear while chemotherapy represents the gold standard treatment only for aggressive forms with low SSTR expression. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging treatment modality for advanced NETs. There are many cumulative evidences about the effectiveness and tolerability of this therapeutic approach, especially in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NETs. For B-NETs, scientific research is moving more slowly. Here, we performed a review in order to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of PRRT with a focus on patients with inoperable or metastatic well-differentiated B-NETs.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours

In the past decades, the number of neuroendocrine tumours that are detected is increasing. A relative new and promising therapy for patients with metastasised or inoperable disease is peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). This therapy involves an infusion of somatostatin analogues linked to radionuclides like Yttrium-90 or Lutetium-177. Objective response rates are reported in 15-35%. Response rates may vary between type of tumour and radionuclide. Besides the objective response rate, overall survival and progression free survival increase significantly. Also, the quality of life improves as well. Serious side-affects are rare. PRRT is usually well tolerated, also in patients with extensive metastasised disease. Recent studies combined PRRT with other types of therapies. Unfortunately no randomised trials comparing these strategies are available. In the future, more research is needed to evaluate the best therapy combinations or sequence of therapies.

Neoadjuvant Treatment of Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]Octreotate

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare neoplasms for which surgery has almost the only potential for cure. When surgery is not possible because of tumor size and vascular involvement, neoadjuvant treatment with [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate ((177)Lu-octreotate) may be an option.

METHODS

We studied 29 Dutch patients with a pathology-proven nonfunctioning pancreatic NET treated with (177)Lu-octreotate. All patients had a borderline or unresectable pancreatic tumor (group 1) or oligometastatic disease (defined as ≤3 liver metastases) (group 2). Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

After the treatment with (177)Lu-octreotate, successful surgery was performed in 9 of 29 patients (31%). Six patients had a Whipple procedure, 2 patients had a pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 1 patient had a distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. The median PFS was 69 mo for patients with successful surgery and 49 mo for the other patients. For comparison, the median PFS in 90 other patients with a nonfunctioning pancreatic NET with more than 3 liver metastases or other metastases was 25 mo.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant treatment with (177)Lu-octreotate is a valuable option for patients with initially unresectable pancreatic NETs.

Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia: Genetics and Clinical Management

Early diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) syndromes is critical for optimal clinical outcomes; before the MEN syndromes can be diagnosed, they must be suspected. Genetic testing for germline alterations in both the MEN type 1 (MEN1) gene and RET proto-oncogene is crucial to identifying those at risk in affected kindreds and directing timely surveillance and surgical therapy to those at greatest risk of potentially life-threatening neoplasia. Pancreatic, thymic, and bronchial neuroendocrine tumors are the leading cause of death in patients with MEN1 and should be aggressively considered by at least biannual computed tomography imaging.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a retrospective single-center analysis using the ENETS TNM-classification and immunohistochemical markers for risk stratification

Background

This study was performed to assess the 2006 introduced ENETS TNM-classification with respect to patient survival and surgical approach for patients who underwent surgery for a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas (PNET).

Methods

Between 2001 and 2010 38 patients after resection of a PNET were investigated regarding tumor localization and size. Further, patient survival with regards to the new TNM-classification, the operation methods and immunohistochemical markers was analyzed.

Results

The estimated mean survival time of the 38 patients was 91 ± 10 months (female 116 ± 9, male 56 ± 14 months; p = 0.008). The 5-year survival rate was 63.9%. Patient survival differed significantly depending on tumor size (pT1 107 ± 13, pT2 94 ± 16, pT3 44 ± 7 and pT4 18 ± 14 months; P = 0.006). Patients without lymph node metastasis survived significantly longer compared to patients with positive lymph node status (108 ± 9 vs. 19 ± 5 months; P < 0.001). However, survival in patients with and without distant metastasis did not differ significantly (92 ± 11 vs. 80 ± 23 months; P = 0.876). Further, the tumor grading significantly influenced patient survival (G1 111 ± 12, G2 68 ± 12 and G3 21 ± 14 months; P = 0.037).

Conclusions

As part of the TNM-classification especially lymph node status and also tumor size and grading were identified as important factors determining patient survival. Further, gender was demonstrated to significantly influence survival time. If an R0 resection was achieved in patients with distant metastases patient survival was comparable to patients without metastasis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12893-015-0033-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

GEPNETs update: Radionuclide therapy in neuroendocrine tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a promising new treatment modality for inoperable or metastasized gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) patients. Most studies report objective response rates in 15-35% of patients. Also, outcome in terms of progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival compares very favorably with that for somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, or new, 'targeted' therapies. They also compare favorably to PFS data for liver-directed therapies. Two decades after the introduction of PRRT, there is a growing need for randomized controlled trials comparing PRRT to 'standard' treatment, that is treatment with agents that have proven benefit when tested in randomized trials. Combining PRRT with liver-directed therapies or with targeted therapies could improve treatment results. The question to be answered, however, is whether a combination of therapies performed within a limited time-span from one another results in a better PFS than a strategy in which other therapies are reserved until after (renewed) tumor progression. Randomized clinical trials comparing PRRT with other treatment modalities should be undertaken to determine the best treatment options and treatment sequelae for patients with GEPNETs.

Therapeutic strategies for neuroendocrine liver metastases

Patients who have neuroendocrine tumors frequently present with liver metastases. A wide panel of treatment options exists for these patients. Liver resection with curative intent achieves the best long-term results. Highly selected patients may be considered for liver transplantation. Substantial recurrence rates reported after surgical approaches call for neoadjuvant and adjuvant concepts. Liver-directed, locally ablative procedures are recommended for patients with limited, nonresectable tumor burden. Angiographic liver-directed techniques, such as transarterial embolization, transarterial chemoembolization, and selective internal radiotherapy, offer excellent palliation for patients with liver-predominant disease. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy is a promising palliative procedure for patients with hepatic and/or extrahepatic metastases. The efficacy of these treatment options needs to be evaluated in randomized trials. Somatostatin analogues have demonstrated effectiveness not only for symptomatic relief in patients with secreting tumors but also for the control of proliferation in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors and most recently also in those originating from the pancreas. Chemotherapy is an option mainly for those with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and high-grade tumors irrespective of the origin. Novel drugs targeting specific pathways within the tumor cell have produced improved progression-free survival compared with placebo in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Despite such a diverse armamentarium, there is uncertainty with regard to the optimal treatment regimens. Newly introduced molecular-based markers, along with the conduction of clinical trials comparing the efficacy of treatment modalities, offer a chance to move the treatment of neuroendocrine tumor disease toward personalized patient care. In this report, the authors review the approaches for treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, identify shortcomings, and anticipate future perspectives. Furthermore, clinical practice recommendations are provided for currently available treatment options. Although multiple modalities are available for the treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases, optimal management is unclear. The current knowledge pertaining to these treatment options is analyzed.

Management of patients with hepatic metastases from neuroendocrine tumors

Neuroendocrine tumors have a disposition toward metastasis to the liver. A range of treatment modalities for neuroendocrine liver metastases is available in the clinical arena, the indications for which depend on tumor characteristics such as patterns of metastasis, tumor grade, and anatomical origin. The complete surgical resection of liver deposits represents the only option with the intent to cure and is the gold standard approach, whereas cytoreductive resection (debulking) presents another surgical option aiming to ameliorate the symptoms and prolong survival. Liver transplantation is generally an accepted option for highly selected patients. For patients ineligible for radical surgery, liver-directed therapies-transarterial embolization/chemoembolization, selective internal radiotherapy, and local tumor ablation-present alternative strategies. Systemic therapies include peptide receptor radiotherapy, somatostatin analogues, cytotoxic chemotherapeutics, and novel molecularly targeted drugs. However, despite the variety of treatments available, there exists little evidence to guide optimal clinical practice with currently available data predominantly retrospective in nature. In this review, we discuss the diagnostic procedures that influence the trajectory of treatment of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases before critically appraising the evidence pertaining to these therapeutic strategies.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs: focus on future developments

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has been shown to be an effective treatment for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) if curative surgery is not an option. A majority of NETs abundantly express somatostatin receptors. Consequently, following administration of somatostatin (SST) analogs labeled with γ-emitting radionuclides, these tumors can be imaged for diagnosis, staging or follow-up purposes. Furthermore, when β-emitting radionuclides are used, radiolabeled peptides (radiopeptides) can also be used for the treatment for NET patients. Even though excellent results have been achieved with PRRT, complete responses are still rare, which means that there is room for improvement. In this review, we highlight some of the directions currently under investigation in pilot clinical studies or in preclinical development to achieve this goal. Although randomized clinical trials are still lacking, early studies have shown that tumor response might be improved by application of other radionuclides, such as α-emitters or radionuclide combinations, or by adjustment of radiopeptide administration routes. Individualized dosimetry and better insight into tumor and normal organ radiation doses may allow adjustment of the amount of administered activity per cycle or the number of treatment cycles, resulting in more personalized treatment schedules. Other options include the application of novel (radiolabeled) SST analogs with improved tumor uptake and radionuclide retention time, or a combination of PRRT with other systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy or treatment with radio sensitizers. Though promising directions appear to bring improvements of PRRT within reach, additional research (including randomized clinical trials) is needed to achieve such improvements.

Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases

Many management strategies exist for neuroendocrine liver metastases. These strategies range from surgery to ablation with various interventional radiology procedures, and include both regional and systemic therapy with diverse biological, cytotoxic, or targeted agents. A paucity of biological, molecular, and genomic information and an absence of data from rigorous trials limit the validity of many publications detailing management. This Review represents the views from an international conference, for which 15 expert working groups prepared evidence-based assessments addressing specific questions, and from which an independent jury derived final recommendations. The aim of the conference was to review the existing approaches to neuroendocrine liver metastases, assess the evidence on which management decisions were based, develop internationally acceptable recommendations for clinical practice (when evidence was available), and make recommendations for clinical and research endeavours. This report represents the final clinical statements and proposals for future research.

PRRT as neoadjuvant treatment in NET

This chapter describes the possibility of using peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as neoadjuvant treatment. PRRT is acknowledged to be a palliative treatment. Recently it has been reported that tumor size decrease followed by surgical intervention might be achieved in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with somatostatin analogs labeled with beta emitters. Such outcome of therapy has been described in a relatively small group of patients. In those patients, the treatment enabled total or partial excision of the tumor, also with liver metastases. Reduction of tumor dimensions or total excision of the tumor corresponded with prolongation of overall survival. The discussed papers on this subject differ in details of treatment (utilization of various isotopes, total activity of the isotope, or combination with radiosensitizing chemotherapy). The chapter presents a brief review of recently published manuscripts.

Treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy

The primary treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) is surgery with curative intent or debulking of the tumor mass. In case of metastatic disease, cytoreductive options are limited. A relatively new therapeutic modality, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, is currently available in a number of mostly European centers. Complete and partial responses obtained after treatment with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide are in the same range as after treatment with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate (i.e. 10-30%). However, significant nephrotoxicity has been observed after treatment with [90Y-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotide. Options to improve PRRT may include combinations of radioactive labeled somatostatin analogs, intra-arterial administration, and the use of radiosensitizing drugs combined with PRRT. Other therapeutic applications of PRRT may include additional therapy cycles in patients with progressive disease after benefit from initial therapy, PRRT in adjuvant or neoadjuvant setting, or PRRT combined with new targeted therapies, such as sunitinib or everolimus. Randomized clinical trials comparing PRRT with other treatment modalities, or comparing various radioactive labeled somatostatin analogs should be undertaken to determine the best treatment options and treatment sequelae for patients with GEPNETs.

Neuroendocrine tumor disease: an evolving landscape

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) represent a heterogenous group of tumors arising from a variety of neuroendocrine cell types. The incidence and prevalence of GEP-NENs have markedly increased over the last three decades. Symptoms are often absent in early disease, or vague and nonspecific even in advanced disease. Delayed diagnosis is thus common. Chromogranin A is the most commonly used biomarker but has limitations as does the proliferative marker Ki-67%, which is often used for tumor grading and determination of therapy. The development of a multidimensional prognostic nomogram may be valuable in predicting tumor behavior and guiding therapy but requires validation. Identification of NENs that express somatostatin receptors (SSTR) allows for SSTR scintigraphy and positron emission tomography imaging using novel radiolabeled compounds. Complete surgical resection of limited disease or endoscopic ablation of small lesions localized in stomach or rectum can provide cure; however, the majority of GEP-NENs are metastatic (most frequently the liver and/or mesenteric lymph nodes) at diagnosis. Selected patients with metastatic disease may benefit from advanced surgical techniques including hepatic resection or liver transplantation. Somatostatin analogs are effective for symptomatic treatment and exhibit some degree of antiproliferative activity in small intestinal NENs. There is a place for streptozotocin, temozolomide, and capecitabine in the management of pancreatic NENs, while new agents targeting either mTOR (everolimus) or angiogenic (sunitinib) pathways have shown efficacy in these lesions.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: Contributions of endoscopy and surgery to primary tumor search

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are diagnosed with increasing frequency and patients often present with liver metastases at the time of diagnosis. Apart from treatment of the metastases, resection of the primary tumor at an early phase is recommended to prevent complications, although it may be difficult to locate, especially in patients with functionally inactive NETs. Small and multifocal tumors in the jejunum and ileum represent a particular challenge. Primary hepatic neuroendocrine carcinoma is extremely rare and is diagnosed only after exclusion of other primary tumors. Therefore, some uncertainty may remain, as small non-hepatic primary tumors may escape detection. Diagnostic work-up in these patients includes biochemical assays and imaging modalities (also comprising specific techniques of scintigraphy and positron emission tomography). This editorial highlights the contributions of endoscopy and operative exploration to the search for the primary tumor. Besides esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, colonoscopy and bronchoscopy, special endoscopic techniques such as balloon enteroscopy or capsule endoscopy are used with growing experience. Compared with balloon enteroscopy, capsule endoscopy is non-invasive and better tolerated, but it cannot localize a lesion precisely and does not allow biopsy or removal of lesions. Before proceeding to surgery, a discussion of the findings by a tumor board should be a standard procedure. Improvements in diagnostic tools have created new perspectives for the detection of obscure primary tumors in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases, and these searches are best coordinated by a multidisciplinary team.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with Gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Introduction

To evaluate efficacy and secondary resectability in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Patients and methods

A total of 215 patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with chemoradiation at a single institution. Radiotherapy was delivered with a median dose of 52.2 Gy in single fractions of 1.8 Gy. Chemotherapy was applied concomitantly as gemcitabine (GEM) at a dose of 300 mg/m² weekly, followed by adjuvant cycles of full-dose GEM (1000 mg/m²). After neoadjuvant CRT restaging was done to evaluate secondary resectability. Overall and disease-free survival were calculated and prognostic factors were estimated.

Results

After CRT a total of 26% of all patients with primary unresectable LAPC were chosen to undergo secondary resection. Tumour free resection margins could be achieved in 39.2% (R0-resection), R1-resections were seen in 41.2%, residual macroscopic tumour in 11.8% (R2) and in 7.8% resection were classified as Rx. Patients with complete resection after CRT showed a significantly increased median overall survival (OS) with 22.1 compared to 11.9 months in non-resected patients. Median OS and disease-free survival (DFS) of all patients were 12.3 and 8.1 months respectively. In most cases the first site of disease progression was systemic with hepatic (52%) and peritoneal (36%) metastases.

Discussion

A high percentage of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer can undergo secondary resection after gemcitabine-based chemoradiation and has a relative long-term prognosis after complete resection.

[Neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and pancreas. Surgical strategy]

The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) has increased worldwide by 3-5 times over the last decades. This is mainly based on the broad use of imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic approaches. As a consequence many duodenal and pancreatic tumors are detected in an early stage resulting in an improved prognosis of these patients. Besides the measurement of serum chromogranin A and 5-hydroxy indolic acid measured in 24 h urine collection, CT, endosonographic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopy are important diagnostic tools. About 20% of all patients with pancreatic and duodenal NETs are diagnosed because of specific symptoms. More than 95% of diagnosed NETs are sporadic tumors. Whenever possible these patients should be treated by resection. Benign neuroendocrine duodenal tumors up to 1 cm in size can be removed endoscopically. The endoscopic resection of larger tumors should be performed surgically. The therapy of hereditary NETs of the duodenum and the pancreas should be decided after interdisciplinary discussion. However, even these patients seem to benefit from resection. In case of metastatic disease debulking surgery should be considered if more than 90% of the tumor mass can be resected. In patients with extensive liver metastases but resectable primary NET, liver transplantation is a reasonable option. There is no consensus about adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment of duodenal or pancreatic NETs. The therapy with everolimus or sunitinib in advanced tumor stages has shown promising results. The administration of somatostatin analogues or antacids is appropriate for symptom reduction.

A multimodal approach to the management of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases

Neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are often indolent malignancies that commonly present with metastatic disease in the liver. Surgical, locoregional, and systemic treatment modalities are reviewed. A multidisciplinary approach to patient care is suggested to ensure all therapeutic options explored.

Hepatic arterial infusion enhances DOTATOC radiopeptide therapy in patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases

Intravenously administered radiolabeled peptides targeting somatostatin receptors are used for the treatment of unresectable gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Recently, we demonstrated a high first-pass effect during intra-arterial (i.a.) administration of positron emission tomography (PET) labeled (68)Ga-DOTA(0)-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC). In this pilot study, we investigated the therapeutic effectiveness of arterial administered DOTATOC, labeled with the therapeutic β emitters (90)Y and (177)Lu. (90)Y- and/or (177)Lu-DOTATOC were infused into the hepatic artery of 15 patients with liver metastases arising from GEP-NETs. Response was assessed using DOTATOC-PET, multiphase contrast enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and the serum tumor marker chromogranin A. Pharmacokinetic data of the arterial approach were assessed using (111)In-DOTATOC scans. With the treatment regime of this pilot study, complete remission was achieved in one (7%) patient and partial remission was observed in eight (53%) patients, six patients were classified as stable (40%; response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria). The concomitant decrease of elevated serum tumor marker confirmed the radiologic response. Median time to progression was not reached within a mean follow-up period of 20 months. Receptor saturation and redistribution effects were identified as limiting factors for i.a. DOTATOC therapy. The high rate of objective radiologic response in NET patients treated with arterial infusion of (90)Y-/(177)Lu-DOTATOC compares favorably with systemic chemotherapy and intravenous radiopeptide therapy. While i.a. DOTATOC therapy is only applicable to patients with tumors of limited anatomic distribution, the results of this pilot study are a promising development in the treatment of GEP-NET and warrants further investigation of this novel approach.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy as a potential tool for neoadjuvant therapy in patients with inoperable neuroendocrine tumours (NETs)

Purpose

Neuroendocrine tumours (NET) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms of diffuse neuroendocrine cells. Surgery is the main aim in the treatment of NETs, which becomes impossible in the case of large tumours or infiltration into other tissues and/or important blood vessels. Neoadjuvant therapy might be helpful in decreasing NET size also, leading us to the point where a tumour, previously considered inoperable, becomes operable. The aim of the study was to assess the usage of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as a neoadjuvant treatment, enabling surgical intervention in primary inoperable NET.

Methods

Among 47 patients treated with PRRT, 6 patients were chosen with large, inoperable tumours, for whom enabling of complete surgical excision of the lesions might offer the prospect for a cure. Response to the therapy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST).

Results

The mean tumour size decreased from 6.9 (min. 3.1 cm, max. 9.6 cm) before therapy to 5.4 cm (min. 3.1 cm, max. 9.5 cm) after the treatment. According to RECIST, stabilization of the disease was observed in four and partial responses in two patients. In two patients, reduction of the tumour size enabled surgical intervention.

Conclusion

(1) PRRT might be considered a neoadjuvant therapy in primary inoperable NETs. (2) According to RECIST, stabilization of the disease was observed in the majority of patients. (3) We suggest that not only tumour diameter changes, but also tumour volume and contrast enhancement changes in computed tomography should be taken into consideration in assessment of the response to the therapy. (4) Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy is an important tool for qualification of the radioisotope therapy and also for the assessment of the response to PRRT.