The combination of mitomycin-induced blood cells with a temporary treatment of ciclosporin A prolongs allograft survival in vascularized composite allotransplantation

Cell-Based Therapies Induce Tolerance of Vascularized Composite Allotransplants: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the transplantation of multiple tissue types as a solution for devastating injuries. Despite the highly encouraging functional outcomes of VCA, the consequences of long-term immunosuppression remain the main obstacle in its application. In this review, we provide researchers and surgeons with a summary of the latest advances in the field of cell-based therapies for VCA tolerance.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature , and Web of Science. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as the basis of our organization.

RESULTS

Hematopoietic stem cells prolonged VCA survival. A combination of immature dendritic cells and tacrolimus was superior to tacrolimus alone. T cell Ig domain and mucin domain modified mature dendritic cells increased VCA tolerance. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells prolonged survival of VCAs. A combination of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin, and antilymphocyte serum significantly improved VCA tolerance. Ex-vivo allotransplant perfusion with recipient's bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells increased VCA survival. Recipient's adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and systemic immunosuppression prolonged VCA survival more than any of those agents alone. Additionally, a combination of peripheral blood mononuclear cells shortly incubated in mitomycin and cyclosporine significantly improved VCA survival. Finally, a combination of donor recipient chimeric cells, anti-αβ-T cell receptor (TCR), and cyclosporine significantly prolonged VCA tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from animal studies shows that cell-based therapies can prolong survival of VCAs. However, there remain many obstacles for these therapies, and they require rigorous clinical research given the rarity of the subjects and the complexity of the therapies. The major limitations of cell-based therapies include the need for conditioning with immunosuppressive drugs and radiation, causing significant toxicity. Safety concerns also persist as most research is on animal models. While completely replacing traditional immunosuppression with cell-based methods is unlikely soon, these therapies could reduce the need for high doses of immunosuppressants and improve VCA tolerance.

Molecular mechanisms regulating wound repair: Evidence for paracrine signaling from corneal epithelial cells to fibroblasts and immune cells following transient epithelial cell treatment with Mitomycin C

In this paper, we use RNAseq to identify senescence and phagocytosis as key factors to understanding how mitomyin C (MMC) stimulates regenerative wound repair. We use conditioned media (CM) from untreated (CMC) and MMC treated (CMM) human and mouse corneal epithelial cells to show that corneal epithelial cells indirectly exposed to MMC secrete elevated levels of immunomodulatory proteins including IL-1α and TGFβ1 compared to cells exposed to CMC. These factors increase epithelial and macrophage phagocytosis and promote ECM turnover. IL-1α supplementation can increase phagocytosis in control epithelial cells and attenuate TGFβ1 induced αSMA expression by corneal fibroblasts. Yet, we show that epithelial cell CM contains factors besides IL-1α that regulate phagocytosis and αSMA expression by fibroblasts. Exposure to CMM also impacts the activation of bone marrow derived dendritic cells and their ability to present antigen. These in vitro studies show how a brief exposure to MMC induces corneal epithelial cells to release proteins and other factors that function in a paracrine way to enhance debris removal and enlist resident epithelial and immune cells as well as stromal fibroblasts to support regenerative and not fibrotic wound healing.

Induction of Long-Lasting Regulatory B Lymphocytes by Modified Immune Cells in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

We recently demonstrated that donor-derived modified immune cells (MICs)-PBMCs that acquire immunosuppressive properties after a brief treatment-induced specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor when administered before kidney transplantation. We found up to a 68-fold increase in CD19 + CD24 hi CD38 hi transitional B lymphocytes compared with transplanted controls.

METHODS

Ten patients from a phase 1 clinical trial who had received MIC infusions before kidney transplantation were followed to post-transplant day 1080.

RESULTS

Patients treated with MICs had a favorable clinical course, showing no donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies or acute rejections. The four patients who had received the highest dose of MICs 7 days before surgery and were on reduced immunosuppressive therapy showed an absence of in vitro lymphocyte reactivity against stimulatory donor blood cells, whereas reactivity against third party cells was preserved. In these patients, numbers of transitional B lymphocytes were 75-fold and seven-fold higher than in 12 long-term survivors on minimal immunosuppression and four operationally tolerant patients, respectively ( P <0.001 for both). In addition, we found significantly higher numbers of other regulatory B lymphocyte subsets and a gene expression signature suggestive of operational tolerance in three of four patients. In MIC-treated patients, in vitro lymphocyte reactivity against donor blood cells was restored after B lymphocyte depletion, suggesting a direct pathophysiologic role of regulatory B lymphocytes in donor-specific unresponsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that donor-specific immunosuppression after MIC infusion is long-lasting and associated with a striking increase in regulatory B lymphocytes. Donor-derived MICs appear to be an immunoregulatory cell population that when administered to recipients before transplantation, may exert a beneficial effect on kidney transplants.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

MIC Cell Therapy for Individualized Immunosuppression in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients (TOL-1), NCT02560220.

Individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor-derived modified immune cells compared with standard of care in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, phase II, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Donor-derived modified immune cells (MIC) induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor in preclinical models of transplantation. In a phase I clinical trial (TOL-1 Study), MIC treatment resulted in a cellular phenotype that was directly and indirectly suppressive to the recipient's immune system allowing for reduction of conventional immunosuppressive therapy. Here, we describe a protocol for a randomised controlled, multicentre phase-IIb clinical trial of individualised immunosuppression with intravenously administered donor MIC compared with standard-of-care (SoC) in living donor kidney transplantation (TOL-2 Study).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Sixty-three living donor kidney transplant recipients from six German transplant centres are randomised 2:1 to treatment with MIC (MIC group, N=42) or no treatment with MIC (control arm, N=21). MIC are manufactured from donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells under Good Manufacturing Practice conditions. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the efficacy of MIC treatment together with reduced conventional immunosuppressive therapy in terms of achieving an operational tolerance-like phenotype compared with SoC 12 months after MIC administration. Key secondary endpoints are the number of patient-relevant infections as well as a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, graft dysfunction or death. Immunosuppressive therapy of MIC-treated patients is reduced during follow-up under an extended immunological monitoring including human leucocyte antigen-antibody testing, and determination of lymphocyte subsets, for example, regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) and antidonor T cell response. A Data Safety Monitoring Board has been established to allow an independent assessment of safety and efficacy.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been provided by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (AFmu-580/2021, 17 March 2022) and from the Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany (Vorlage-Nr. 4586/02, 21 March 2022). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients and respective donors prior to enrolment in the study. The results from the TOL-2 Study will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals and will be presented at symposia and scientific meetings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05365672.

Pre-transplant infusion of donor leukocytes treated with extracorporeal photochemotherapy induces immune hypo-responsiveness and long-term allograft survival in murine models

Recipients of solid organ transplantation (SOT) rely on life-long immunosuppression (IS), which is associated with significant side effects. Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) is a safe, existing cellular therapy used to treat transplant rejection by modulating the recipient’s own blood cells. We sought to induce donor-specific hypo-responsiveness of SOT recipients by infusing ECP-treated donor leukocytes prior to transplant. To this end, we utilized major histocompatibility complex mismatched rodent models of allogeneic cardiac, liver, and kidney transplantation to test this novel strategy. Leukocytes isolated from donor-matched spleens for ECP treatment (ECP-DL) were infused into transplant recipients seven days prior to SOT. Pre-transplant infusion of ECP-DL without additional IS was associated with prolonged graft survival in all models. This innovative approach promoted the production of tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T-cells with subsequent inhibition of T-cell priming and differentiation, along with a significant reduction of donor-specific T-cells in the spleen and grafts of treated animals. This new application of donor-type ECP-treated leukocytes provides insight into the mechanisms behind ECP-induced immunoregulation and holds significant promise in the prevention of graft rejection and reduction in need of global immune suppressive therapy in patients following SOT.

Docking and ADMET studies for investigating the anticancer potency of Moscatilin on APC10/DOC1 and PKM2 against five clinical drugs

BACKGROUND

Moscatilin is a bibenzyl derivative (stilbenoid), mainly found in Dendrobium species. This plant-derived chemical is a potential cytotoxic anticancer drug that acts against different cancer types. The present study compared the structural interactions of Moscatilin along with five clinically relevant drugs against two target proteins, viz., Anaphase-Promoting Complex subunit 10/Death of Cyclase 1 and Pyruvate Kinase Muscle isozyme M2 in silico. Out of five clinical ligands, four were plant-derived compounds, viz., Resveratrol, Paclitaxel, Shikonin, and Colchicine. The synthetic chemotherapeutic agent, Mitomycin-C, was used as a ligand to compare the mechanistic insights. The objective of the study was to determine the anticancer potency of Moscatilin in silico.

RESULTS

Moscatilin was found to have an advantage over other drugs of interest due to its structural simplicity and folding bridge connecting the bibenzyl structures. Moscatilin exhibited dual function by exclusively affecting the cancer cells, creating instabilities in biochemical and molecular cascades.

CONCLUSIONS

The study demonstrates that Moscatilin is has a multi-antimetastatic function. Moscatilin interaction with APC10/DOC1 indicated that the drug is involved with post-replicative inhibition, and with PKM2 showed glycolytic pathway inhibition in cancer cells. Moscatilin can function as an effective cell cycle inhibitor.

Cellular Therapies in Solid Organ Allotransplantation: Promise and Pitfalls

Donor specific transfusions have been the basis of tolerance inducing protocols since Peter Medawar showed that it was experimentally feasible in the 1950s. Though trials of cellular therapies have become increasingly common in solid organ transplantation, they have not become standard practice. Additionally, whereas some protocols have focused on cellular therapies as a method for donor antigen delivery—thought to promote tolerance in and of itself in the correct immunologic context—other approaches have alternatively focused on the intrinsic immunosuppressive properties of the certain cell types with less emphasis on their origin, including mesenchymal stem cells, regulatory T cells, and regulatory dendritic cells. Regardless of intent, all cellular therapies must contend with the potential that introducing donor antigen in a new context will lead to sensitization. In this review, we focus on the variety of cellular therapies that have been applied in human trials and non-human primate models, describe their efficacy, highlight data regarding their potential for sensitization, and discuss opportunities for cellular therapies within our current understanding of the immune landscape.

Phase I trial of donor-derived modified immune cell infusion in kidney transplantation

BACKGROUNDPreclinical experiments have shown that donor blood cells, modified in vitro by an alkylating agent (modified immune cells [MICs]), induced long-term specific immunosuppression against the allogeneic donor.METHODSIn this phase I trial, patients received either 1.5 × 106 MICs per kg BW on day -2 (n = 3, group A), or 1.5 × 108 MICs per kg BW on day -2 (n = 3, group B) or day -7 (n = 4, group C) before living donor kidney transplantation in addition to post-transplantation immunosuppression. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of adverse events (AEs) until day 30 (study phase) with follow-up out to day 360.RESULTSMIC infusions were extremely well tolerated. During the study phase, 10 treated patients experienced a total of 69 AEs that were unlikely to be related or not related to MIC infusion. No donor-specific human leukocyte antigen Abs or rejection episodes were noted, even though the patients received up to 1.3 × 1010 donor mononuclear cells before transplantation. Group C patients with low immunosuppression during follow-up showed no in vitro reactivity against stimulatory donor blood cells on day 360, whereas reactivity against third-party cells was still preserved. Frequencies of CD19+CD24hiCD38hi transitional B lymphocytes (Bregs) increased from a median of 6% before MIC infusion to 20% on day 180, which was 19- and 68-fold higher, respectively, than in 2 independent cohorts of transplanted controls. The majority of Bregs produced the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10. MIC-treated patients showed the Immune Tolerance Network operational tolerance signature.CONCLUSIONMIC administration was safe and could be a future tool for the targeted induction of tolerogenic Bregs.TRIAL REGISTRATIONEudraCT number: 2014-002086-30; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02560220.FUNDINGFederal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Technology, Berlin, Germany, and TolerogenixX GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.