Role of lymphadenectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and treatment at high-volume centers in patients with resected pancreatic cancer-a distinct view on lymph node yield

A novel nomogram based on the number of positive lymph nodes can predict the overall survival of patients with pancreatic head cancer after radical surgery

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to construct a novel nomogram based on the number of positive lymph nodes to predict the overall survival of patients with pancreatic head cancer after radical surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

2271 and 973 patients in the SEER Database were included in the development set and validation set, respectively. The primary clinical endpoint was OS (overall survival). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to screen independent risk factors of OS, and then independent risk factors were used to construct a novel nomogram. The C-index, calibration curves, and decision analysis curves were used to evaluate the predictive power of the nomogram in the development and validation sets.

RESULTS

After multivariate Cox regression analysis, the independent risk factors for OS included age, tumor extent, chemotherapy, tumor size, LN (lymph nodes) examined, and LN positive. A nomogram was constructed by using independent risk factors for OS. The C-index of the nomogram for OS was 0.652 [(95% confidence interval (CI): 0.639-0.666)] and 0.661 (95%CI: 0.641-0.680) in the development and validation sets, respectively. The calibration curves and decision analysis curves proved that the nomogram had good predictive ability.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram based on the number of positive LN can effectively predict the overall survival of patients with pancreatic head cancer after surgery.

Identifying suitable candidates for pancreaticoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate long-term quality of life and survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy (PDEL) and identify candidates.

METHODS

Patients with resectable PDAC with ≥1 examined lymph node (LN) during pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), and were divided into the PD with standard lymphadenectomy (PDSL) and PDEL groups. Perioperative data, long-term quality of life and survival were compared, and the prognostic effect of LNs ± in every peripancreatic station were analysed.

RESULTS

Screening 446 PDAC patients, 237 and 126 were included in the PDSL and PDEL groups, respectively. The PDEL group showed a longer operation time, greater intraoperative blood loss, severe diarrhoea, a higher incidence of grade III complications. Notably, the PDEL patients experienced significant relief from low back pain and diarrhoea, with an obvious survival advantage (p = 0.037), especially in patients with preoperative tumor contact with vascular and pathological N0; however, LNs+ in any station (No. 8p, 12, 14, or 16) were associated with a poorer prognosis. The vascular reconstruction, T and N stage were independent risk factors for survival.

CONCLUSION

PDEL can relieve symptoms and prolong the survival of PDAC patients with acceptable complications, and EL should be performed regardless of preoperative LN enlargement.

Effect of centre volume on pathological outcomes and postoperative complications after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of a multicentre national study

BACKGROUND

The association between volume, complications and pathological outcomes is still under debate regarding colorectal cancer surgery. The aim of the study was to assess the association between centre volume and severe complications, mortality, less-than-radical oncologic surgery, and indications for neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 16,883 colorectal cancer cases from 80 centres (2018-2021). Outcomes: 30-day mortality; Clavien-Dindo grade >2 complications; removal of ≥ 12 lymph nodes; non-radical resection; neoadjuvant therapy. Quartiles of hospital volumes were classified as LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, and VERY HIGH. Independent predictors, both overall and for rectal cancer, were evaluated using logistic regression including age, gender, AJCC stage and cancer site.

RESULTS

LOW-volume centres reported a higher rate of severe postoperative complications (OR 1.50, 95% c.i. 1.15-1.096, P = 0.003). The rate of ≥ 12 lymph nodes removed in LOW-volume (OR 0.68, 95% c.i. 0.56-0.85, P < 0.001) and MEDIUM-volume (OR 0.72, 95% c.i. 0.62-0.83, P < 0.001) centres was lower than in VERY HIGH-volume centres. Of the 4676 rectal cancer patients, the rate of ≥ 12 lymph nodes removed was lower in LOW-volume than in VERY HIGH-volume centres (OR 0.57, 95% c.i. 0.41-0.80, P = 0.001). A lower rate of neoadjuvant chemoradiation was associated with HIGH (OR 0.66, 95% c.i. 0.56-0.77, P < 0.001), MEDIUM (OR 0.75, 95% c.i. 0.60-0.92, P = 0.006), and LOW (OR 0.70, 95% c.i. 0.52-0.94, P = 0.019) volume centres (vs. VERY HIGH).

CONCLUSION

Colorectal cancer surgery in low-volume centres is at higher risk of suboptimal management, poor postoperative outcomes, and less-than-adequate oncologic resections. Centralisation of rectal cancer cases should be taken into consideration to optimise the outcomes.

The Impact of Age in the Treatment of Non-comorbid Patients with Rectal Cancer: Survival Outcomes from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Multimodal therapy has improved survival outcomes for rectal cancer (RC) significantly with an exemption for older patients. We sought to assess whether older non-comorbid patients receive substandard oncological treatment for localized RC referring to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and whether it affects survival outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study using patient data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) for histologically confirmed RC from 2002 to 2014. Non-comorbid patients between ≥50 and ≤85 years and defined treatment for localized RC were included and assigned to a younger (<75 years) and an older group (≥75 years). Treatment approaches and their impact on relative survival (RS) were analyzed using loess regression models and compared between both groups. Furthermore, mediation analysis was performed to measure the independent relative effect on age and other variables on RS. Data were assessed using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist.

RESULTS

Of 59,769 included patients, 48,389 (81.0%) were assigned to the younger group (<75 years). Oncologic resection was performed in 79.6% of the younger patients compared to 67.2% of the older patients (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy (74.3% vs. 56.1%) and radiotherapy (72.0% vs. 58.1%) were provided less often in older patients, respectively (p < 0.001). Increasing age was associated with enhanced 30- and 90-day mortality with 0.6% and 1.1% in the younger and 2.0% and 4.1% in the elderly group (p < 0.001) and worse RS rates [multivariable adjusted HR: 1.93 (95% CI 1.87-2.00), p < 0.001]. Adherence to standard oncological therapy resulted in a significant increase in 5-year RS (multivariable adjusted HR: 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86), p < 0.001). Mediation analysis revealed that RS was mainly affected by age itself (84%) rather than the choice of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The likelihood to receive substandard oncological therapy increases in the older population and negatively affects RS. Since age itself has a major impact on RS, better patient selection should be performed to identify those that are potentially eligible for standard oncological care regardless of their age.

Higher Numbers of Examined Lymph Nodes Are Associated with Increased Survival in Resected, Treatment-Naïve, Node-Positive Esophageal, Gastric, Pancreatic, and Colon Cancers

BACKGROUND OR PURPOSE

The role of extended lymphadenectomy as part of resection for lymph node (LN)-positive gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies remains controversial with no clear clinical guidance. The purpose of this retrospective study is to determine whether the number of LNs examined as part of GI malignancy resections affects overall survival (OS) among patients with node-positive esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and colon cancers.

METHODS

Participants with LN-positive GI cancers who were diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 and underwent oncologic resections were selected from National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary predictor was the number of examined LNs categorized in tertiles. The effect on OS was measured by hazard ratio (HR) derived from multivariate Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

From 2004 to 2015, 1877, 10,086, 18,193, and 102,500 patients with LN-positive esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, and colon adenocarcinomas who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment and underwent oncologic tumor resection were registered in the NCDB. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling, greater LNs examined in surgically resected LN-positive GI cancers were found to be associated with increased OS for all histologies. This association was the strongest (as compared to the lowest tertile) for gastric cancer (middle tertile: HR = 0.91, 95% CI, 0.86-0.96, p = 0.001; highest tertile: HR = 0.73, 95% CI, 0.69-0.78, p < 0.001), followed by colon (highest tertile: HR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.84-0.88, p < 0.001), esophageal (highest tertile: HR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.72-0.95, p = 0.01), and pancreatic (highest tertile: HR = 0.93, 95% CI, 0.89-0.98, p = 0.002) cancers.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

In patients with surgically resected node-positive GI malignancies who did not receive neoadjuvant systemic therapy, a higher number of examined LNs is associated with increased OS. This association is the strongest for gastric cancer, followed by colon, esophageal, and pancreatic cancers respectively.

Lymph node ratio is a superior predictor in surgically treated early-onset pancreatic cancer

Background

The prognostic performance of four lymph node classifications, the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Node Metastasis (TNM) N stage, lymph node ratio (LNR), log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), and examined lymph nodes (ELN) in early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC) remains unclear.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for patients with EOPC from 2004 to 2016. 1048 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 733) and validation sets (n = 315). The predictive abilities of the four lymph node staging systems were compared using the Akaike information criteria (AIC), receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC), and C-index. Multivariate Cox analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. A nomogram based on lymph node classification with the strongest predictive ability was established. The nomogram’s precision was verified by the C-index, calibration curves, and AUC. Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to compare differences in survival at each stage of the nomogram.

Results

Compared with the 8th N stage, LODDS, and ELN, LNR had the highest C-index and AUC and the lowest AIC. Multivariate analysis showed that N stage, LODDS, LNR were independent risk factors associated with cancer specific survival (CSS), but not ELN. In the training set, the AUC values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year CSS of the nomogram were 0.663, 0.728, and 0.760, respectively and similar results were observed in the validation set. In addition, Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the nomogram was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC.

Conclusion

We analyzed the predictive power of the four lymph node staging systems and found that LNR had the strongest predictive ability. Furthermore, the novel nomogram prognostic staging mode based on LNR was also an important factor in the risk stratification of EOPC.

Centralization of pancreatic cancer treatment within an integrated healthcare system improves overall survival

BACKGROUND

Higher-volume centers for pancreatic cancer surgeries have been shown to have improved outcomes such as length of stay. We examined how centralization of pancreatic cancer care within a regional integrated healthcare system improves overall survival.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 1621 patients treated for pancreatic cancer from February 2010 to December 2018. Care was consolidated into 4 Centers of Excellence (COE) in surgery, medical oncology, and other specialties. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, Chi-square tests, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed.

RESULTS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy use rose from 10% to 31% (p < .001). The median overall survival (OS) improved by 3 months after centralization (p < .001), but this did not reach significance on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in a large integrated healthcare system, centralization improves overall survival and neoadjuvant therapy utilization for pancreatic cancer patients.

N, LNR or LODDS: Which Is the Most Appropriate Lymph Node Classification Scheme for Patients with Radically Resected Pancreatic Cancer?

Simple Summary

To date, no data are available regarding the most appropriate alternative LN classification system with respect to prognostic power and discriminative ability in cases with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We compared different lymph node classification systems with regard to accurate evaluation of overall survival in 319 patients with resected PDAC. One LNR and one LODDS classification scheme were found to out-perform the N category in distinct patient subgroups. Only the LODDS classification exhibited statistically significant, gradually increasing HRs of their subcategories and, at the same time, significantly better discriminative potential in the subgroups of patients with PDAC of the head or corpus and in patients with tumor-free resection margins or M0 status, respectively.

Abstract

Background: Even though numerous novel lymph node (LN) classification schemes exist, an extensive comparison of their performance in patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has not yet been performed. Method: We investigated the prognostic performance and discriminative ability of 25 different LN ratio (LNR) and 27 log odds of metastatic LN (LODDS) classifications by means of Cox regression and C-statistic in 319 patients with resected PDAC. Regression models were adjusted for age, sex, T category, grading, localization, presence of metastatic disease, positivity of resection margins, and neoadjuvant therapy. Results: Both LNR or LODDS as continuous variables were associated with advanced tumor stage, distant metastasis, positive resection margins, and PDAC of the head or corpus. Two distinct LN classifications, one LODDS and one LNR, were found to be superior to the N category in the complete patient collective. However, only the LODDS classification exhibited statistically significant, gradually increasing HRs of their subcategories and at the same time significantly higher discriminative potential in the subgroups of patients with PDAC of the head or corpus and in patients with tumor free resection margins or M0 status, respectively. On this basis, we built a clinically helpful nomogram to estimate the prognosis of patients after radically resected PDAC. Conclusion: One LNR and one LODDS classification scheme were found to out-perform the N category in terms of both prognostic performance and discriminative ability, in distinct patient subgroups, with reference to OS in patients with resected PDAC.

Optimal Region of Lymph Node Dissection in Distal Pancreatectomy for Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer Based on Tumor Location

BACKGROUND

The optimal lymph node (LN) dissection for left-sided pancreatic cancer based on tumor location has remained unknown. In particular, the efficacy of LN dissection around the common hepatic artery and the celiac axis for distal tumors has not been established. This study was designed to elucidate the frequency and prognostic impact of LN metastasis, focusing on tumor location.

METHODS

Data from 110 patients with invasive pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatectomy between 2007 and 2020 were collected. We used a quantitative value-the distance between the left side of the portal vein and the right side of tumor (DPT)-to define the tumor location. LN stations were divided into two groups: peripancreatic lymph nodes (PLN) and non-PLN. We then analyzed the frequency of LN metastasis based on the tumor location and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Non-PLN metastasis was observed in 7.3% of patients. Non-PLN metastasis was found only in patients with a DPT < 20 mm. Patients with non-PLN metastasis exhibited a significantly worse prognosis than those with only-PLN metastasis (median survival time: 20.3 vs. 42.5 months, p = 0.048). Multivariate analysis for survival indicated that tumor size > 4 cm (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.23, p = 0.012) and metastasis in the non-PLN region (HR: 3.02, p = 0.015), and inability to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 2.81, p = 0.0018) were also associated with poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Dissection of the non-PLN region can be avoided in selected patients with DPT ≥ 20 mm.

Prognostic Factors of Survival in Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis to Liver at Different Ages of Diagnosis: A SEER Population-Based Cohort Study

Background: Liver is a common metastatic organ for most malignancies, especially the pancreas. However, evidence for prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer metastasis to the liver at different ages is lacking. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the predictors of patients with pancreatic cancer metastasis to liver grouped by age of diagnosis.

Methods: We chose the patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 from the SEER database. The primary lesions of metastatic liver cancer between sexes were compared using the Pearson’s chi-square test for categorical variables. The overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were the endpoint of the study. The prognostic factors were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, and Cox proportional-hazards regression model.

Results: The main primary sites of metastatic liver cancer for our patients are lung and brunchu, sigmoid colon, pancreas, which in males are lung and bronchu, sigmoid colon and pancreas, while breast, lung and bronchu, sigmoid colon in females. Furthermore, we explored the prognostic factors of pancreatic cancer metastasis to liver grouped by age at diagnosis. Tumor grade, histology and treatment are valid prognostic factors in all age groups. Additionally, gender and AJCC N stage in age<52 years old, while race and AJCC N stage in age >69 years old were predictors. Surgery alone was the optimal treatment in group age>69 years old, whereas surgery combined with chemotherapy was the best option in the other groups.

Conclusion: Our study evaluated the predictors of patients with pancreatic cancer metastasis to liver at various ages of diagnosis.

Score for predicting overall survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with positive lymph nodes after surgery: a novel nomogram-based risk assessment

Background

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PaC) patients with positive lymph nodes (PLNs) have a dismal prognosis and lack a specific prognostic stage. This study aimed to construct a nomogram for the prediction of overall survival (OS) in these patients.

Methods

A total of 1,340 patients screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database were included and randomly divided at a ratio of 7:3 into a training set (n=940) and an internal validation set (n=400). Cox regression analyses were conducted to select independent predictors in the training set, and a nomogram was constructed. The model was verified in the internal validation set and in an external validation set, which comprised 64 patients from a Chinese institute.

Results

Six independent prognostic factors (age at diagnosis, tumor grade, lymph node ratio, T stage, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) were identified in PaC patients with PLNs and were entered into the nomogram. The final model had a higher C-index for predicting OS than the American Joint Committee on Cancer-8th edition staging system (training set: 0.658 vs. 0.546; internal validation set: 0.661 vs. 0.546; external validation set: 0.691 vs. 0.581). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values indicated better discrimination power for the established nomogram with respect to the prediction of OS in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets than for the American Joint Committee on Cancer-8th edition staging system. Furthermore, the nomogram performed well in both calibration and decision curve analyses (DCA) of clinical applicability. OS in PaC patients with PLNs was significantly distinguished among the three risk groups stratified according to the nomogram score (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The well-calibrated nomogram was determined to be extremely efficient in predicting survival, and defining a high-risk population based on the nomogram score among PaC patients with PLNs after surgery.

Role of Node Dissection in Pancreatic Tumor Resection

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease, and, even with modern therapies, the mortality has not decreased significantly in decades. The prognostic importance of lymph node status is well defined; however, the role of extended lymphadenectomy to improve local recurrence and overall survival remains debated. Six randomized controlled trials have evaluated the extent of lymph node dissection in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to review the current literature to evaluate the role of lymphadenectomy in pancreatic cancer. The impact of each trial and its contribution to the literature is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple randomized trials have failed to note an improvement in overall survival with extended lymphadenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Rather, extended lymphadenectomy was associated with increased morbidity, operating room time, and length of stay.

Role of lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic cancer (PC) remains one of the most devastating malignant diseases, predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer-related death by 2030. Despite advances in surgical techniques and in systemic therapy, the 5-year relative survival remains a grim 9% for all stages combined. The extent of lymphadenectomy has been discussed intensively for decades, given that even in early stages of PC, lymph node (LN) metastasis can be detected in approximately 80%.

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this review was to provide an overview of the current literature evaluating the role of lymphadenectomy in resected PC. For this, we evaluated randomized controlled studies (RCTs) assessing the impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on OS and studies evaluating the prognostic impact of anatomical site of LN metastasis and the impact of the number of resected LNs on OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphadenectomy plays an essential part in the multimodal treatment algorithm of PC and is an additional therapeutic tool to increase the chance for surgical radicality and to ensure correct staging for optimal oncological therapy. Based on the literature from the last decades, standard lymphadenectomy with resection of at least ≥ 15 LNs is associated with an acceptable postoperative complication risk and should be recommended to obtain local radicality and accurate staging of the disease. Although radical surgery including appropriate lymphadenectomy of regional LNs remains the only chance for long-term tumor control, future studies specifically assessing the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on extraregional LNs are warranted.