Variation in Hospital Mortality After Complex Cancer Surgery: Patient, Volume, Hospital or Social Determinants?

INTRODUCTION

We sought to define the individual contributions of patient characteristics (PCs), hospital characteristics (HCs), case volume (CV), and social determinants of health (SDoH) on in-hospital mortality (IHM) after complex cancer surgery.

METHODS

The California Department of Health Care Access and Information database identified patients who underwent esophagectomy (ES), pneumonectomy (PN), pancreatectomy (PD), or proctectomy (PR) for a malignant diagnosis between 2010 and 2020. Multi-level multivariable regression was performed to assess the proportion of variance explained by PCs, HCs, CV and SDoH on IHM.

RESULTS

A total of 52,838 patients underwent cancer surgery (ES: n = 2,700, 5.1%; PN: n = 30,822, 58.3%; PD: n = 7530, 14.3%; PR: n = 11,786, 22.3%) across 294 hospitals. The IHM for the overall cohort was 1.7% and varied from 4.4% for ES to 0.8% for PR. On multivariable regression, PCs contributed the most to the variance in IHM (overall: 32.0%; ES: 21.6%; PN: 28.0%; PD: 20.3%; PR: 39.9%). Among the overall cohort, CV contributed 2.4%, HCs contributed 1.3%, and SDoH contributed 1.2% to the variation in IHM. CV was the second highest contributor to IHM among ES (5.3%), PN (5.3%), and PD (5.9%); however, HCs were a more important contributor among patients who underwent PR (8.0%). The unexplained variance in IHM was highest among ES (72.4%), followed by the PD (67.5%) and PN (64.6%) patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

PCs are the greatest underlying contributor to variations in IHM following cancer surgery. These data highlight the need to focus on optimizing patients and exploring unexplained sources of IHM to improve quality of surgical care.

Association of Hospital Market Competition with Outcomes of Complex Cancer Surgery

BACKGROUND

The association of hospital market competition, financial costs, and quality of oncologic care has not been well-defined. This study sought to evaluate variations in patient outcomes and financial expenditures after complex cancer surgery across high- and low-competition markets.

METHODS

Medicare 100% Standard Analytic Files were used to identify patients with lung, esophageal, gastric, hepatopancreaticobiliary, or colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection between 2018 and 2021. Data were merged with the annual hospital survey database, and the hospital market Herfindahl-Hirschman index was used to categorize hospitals into low- and high-concentration markets. Multi-level, multivariable regression models adjusting for patient characteristics (i.e., age, sex, comorbidities, and social vulnerability), year of procedure, and hospital factors (i.e., case volume, nurse-bed ratio, and teaching status) were used to assess the association between hospital market competition and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 117,641 beneficiaries who underwent complex oncologic surgery, the mean age was 73.8 ± 6.1 years, and approximately one-half of the cohort was male (n = 56,243, 47.8%). Overall, 63.8% (n = 75,041) of the patients underwent care within a high-competition market. Notably, there was marked geographic variation relative to market competition. High versus low market-competition hospitals were more likely to be in high social vulnerability areas (35.1 vs 27.5%; p < 0.001), as well as care for racial/ethnic minority individuals (13.8 vs 7.7%; p < 0.001), and patients with more comorbidities (≥ 2 Elixhauser comorbidities: 63.1 vs 61.1%; p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, treatment at hospitals in high- versus low-competition markets was associated with lower odds of achieving a textbook outcome (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-0.99; p = 0.009). Patients at high-competition hospitals had greater mean index hospitalization costs ($19,462.2 [16211.9] vs $18,844.7 [14994.7]) and 90-day post-discharge costs ($7807.8 [15431.3] vs $7332.8 [14038.2]) (both p < 0.001) than individuals at low-competition hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital market competition was associated with poor achievement of an optimal postoperative outcome and greater hospitalization costs.

Cannabis use disorder and perioperative outcomes following complex cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis usage is increasing in the United States, especially among patients with cancer. We sought to evaluate whether cannabis use disorder (CUD) was associated with higher morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing complex cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent complex cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2019 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database. CUD was defined according to ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching was performed to create a 1:1 matched cohort that was well balanced with respect to covariates, which included patient comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, and procedure type. The primary composite outcome was in-hospital mortality and seven major perioperative complications (myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury, stroke, respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism, hospital-acquired infection, and surgical procedure-related complications).

RESULTS

Among 15 014 patients who underwent a high-risk surgical procedure, a cohort of 7507 patients with CUD (median age; 43 years [IQR: 30-56 years]; n = 3078 [41.0%] female) were matched with 7507 patients who were not cannabis users (median age; 44 years [IQR: 30-58 years); n = 2997 [39.9%] female). CUD was associated with slight increased risk relative to postoperative kidney injury (CUD, 7.8% vs. no CUD, 6.1%); however, in-hospital mortality was slightly lower (CUD, 0.9% vs. no CUD, 1.6%) (both p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for other risk factors, CUD was not associated with higher morbidity and mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.15; p = 0.158).

CONCLUSION

CUD was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality following complex cancer surgery.

Association between social determinants of health and delayed postoperative adjuvant therapy among patients undergoing resection of pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) requires a multimodality approach. We sought to define the association between social determinants of health (SDOH) and delayed or nonreceipt of adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) among patients undergoing PDAC resection.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent PDAC resection between 2014 and 2020 were identified from Medicare Standard Analytic Files and merged with the county-level social vulnerability index (SVI). Mediation analysis defined the association between SVI subthemes and aCT receipt.

RESULTS

Among 24 078 patients, 47.7% received timely aCT, 17.7% received delayed aCT, and 34.6% did not receive any aCT. High SVI was associated with delay (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.34) and nonreceipt of aCT (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.20-1.41) (both p < 0.05). 73.1% of the variation in timely aCT receipt was directly attributable to SVI, whereas 26.9% of the effect was due to indirect mediators including hospital volume (6.4%), length-of-stay (7.9%) and postoperative complications (12.6%). Socioeconomic status (delayed aCT: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.13-1.38; nonreceipt aCT: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36) and household composition and disability (delayed aCT: OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.43; nonreceipt aCT: OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.29) were associated with receipt of aCT (both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the disparities in receipt of aCT after PDAC surgery are driven by underlying SDOH such as SVI.

Care fragmentation in hepatopancreatic surgery and postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Practice fragmentation in surgery may be associated with poor quality of care. We sought to define the association between fragmented practice and outcomes in hepatopancreatic surgery relative to surgeon volume and sex.

METHODS

Medicare beneficiaries who underwent hepatopancreatic surgery between 2016 and 2021 were identified. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine provider sex-based differences in the rate of fragmented practice relative to the achievement of a textbook outcome and health care expenditures after adjusting for procedure-specific case volume.

RESULTS

Among 37,416 patients, almost one-half were female (n = 18,333, 49.0%) with the majority treated by male surgeons (n = 33,697, 90.8%). Female surgeons were more likely to have a greater rate of fragmented practice (females: n = 242, 84.9% vs males: n = 1,487, 78.4%, P = .003; odds ratio 2.66, 95% confidence interval 2.33-3.03, P < .001). Patients treated by high rate of fragmented practice surgeons had increased odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.54), extended length-of-stay (odds ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.38-1.68), 90-day-mortality (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.72), and lower odds of achieving a textbook outcome (odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.83). This association persisted independent of surgeon-specific volume (textbook outcome, high vs low rate of fragmented practice: high-volume surgeon, odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.91, P = .021 vs. low-volume surgeon, odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.82, P < .001). Among patients treated by male surgeons, a high rate of fragmented practice was associated with reduced odds of achieving a textbook outcome (male surgeons: odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.82, P < .001; female surgeons: odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.63-1.05, P = .110). Treatment by surgeons with higher fragmented practice was associated with higher expenditures (index expenditure: percentage difference 9.87, 95% confidence interval, 7.42-12.36; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

A high rate of fragmented practice adversely affected postoperative outcomes and healthcare expenditures even among high-volume surgeons with the impact varying based on surgeon sex.

Effect of Behavioral Health Disorders on Surgical Outcomes in Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Behavioral health disorders (BHDs) can often be exacerbated in the setting of cancer. We sought to define the prevalence of BHD among cancer patients and characterize the association of BHD with surgical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients diagnosed with lung, esophageal, gastric, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer between 2018 and 2021 were identified within Medicare Standard Analytic Files. Data on BHD defined as substance abuse, eating disorder, or sleep disorder were obtained. Postoperative textbook outcomes (ie no complications, prolonged length of stay, 90-day readmission, or 90-day mortality), as well as in-hospital expenditures and overall survival were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 694,836 cancer patients, 46,719 (6.7%) patients had at least 1 BHD. Patients with BHD were less likely to undergo resection (no BHD: 23.4% vs BHD: 20.3%; p < 0.001). Among surgical patients, individuals with BHD had higher odds of a complication (odds ratio [OR] 1.32 [1.26 to 1.39]), prolonged length of stay (OR 1.36 [1.29 to 1.43]), and 90-day readmission (OR 1.57 [1.50 to 1.65]) independent of social vulnerability or hospital-volume status resulting in lower odds to achieve a TO (OR 0.66 [0.63 to 0.69]). Surgical patients with BHD also had higher in-hospital expenditures (no BHD: $16,159 vs BHD: $17,432; p < 0.001). Of note, patients with BHD had worse long-term postoperative survival (median, no BHD: 46.6 [45.9 to 46.7] vs BHD: 37.1 [35.6 to 38.7] months) even after controlling for other clinical factors (hazard ratio 1.26 [1.22 to 1.31], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

BHD was associated with lower likelihood to achieve a postoperative textbook outcome, higher expenditures, as well as worse prognosis. Initiatives to target BHD are needed to improve outcomes of cancer patients undergoing surgery.

Disparities in clinical trial enrollment among patients with gastrointestinal cancer relative to minority-serving and safety-netting hospitals

BACKGROUND

For results to be generalizable to all patients with cancer, clinical trials need to include a diverse patient demographic that is representative of the general population. We sought to characterize the effect of receiving care at a minority-serving hospital (MSH) and/or safety-net hospital on clinical trial enrollment among patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

METHODS

Adult patients with GI cancer who underwent oncologic surgery and were enrolled in institutional-/National Cancer Institute-funded clinical trials between 2012 and 2019 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Multivariable regression was used to assess the relationship between MSH and safety-net status relative to clinical trial enrollment.

RESULTS

Among 1,112,594 patients, 994,598 (89.4%) were treated at a non-MSH, whereas 117,996 (10.6%) were treated at an MSH. Only 1857 patients (0.2%) were enrolled in a clinical trial; most patients received care at a non-MSH (1794 [96.6%]). On multivariable analysis, the odds of enrollment in a clinical trial were markedly lower among patients treated at an MSH vs non-MSH (odds ratio [OR], 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22-0.46). In addition, even after controlling for receipt of care at MSH, Black patients remained at lower odds of enrollment in a clinical trial than White patients (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.73; both P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Overall, clinical trial participation among patients with GI cancer was extremely low. Patients treated at an MSH and high safety-net burden hospitals and Black individuals were much less likely to be enrolled in a clinical trial. Efforts should be made to improve trial enrollment and address disparities in trial representation.

Survival disparities in rural versus urban patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor: A multi-institutional study from the US neuroendocrine tumor study group

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (PNETs) are indolent malignancies that often have a prolonged clinical course. This study assesses disparities in outcomes between PNET patients who live in urban (UA) and rural areas (RA).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. PNET patients with a home zip code recorded were included and categorized as RA or UA according to the Federal Office of Rural Health Policy. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and logistical regression.

RESULTS

Of the 1176 PNET patients in the database, 1126 (96%) had zip code recorded. While 837 (74%) lived in UA, 289 (26%) lived in RA. RA patients had significantly shorter median OS following primary PNET resection (122 vs 149 months, p ​= ​0.01). After controlling for income, local healthcare access, distance from treatment center, ASA class, BMI, and T/N/M stage, living in a RA remained significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.60, 95%CI 1.08-2.39, p ​= ​0.02).

CONCLUSION

Rural patients have significantly shorter OS following PNET resection compared to their urban counterparts.

Surgical outcomes and healthcare expenditures among patients with dementia undergoing major surgery

BACKGROUND

We sought to define surgical outcomes among elderly patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) following major thoracic and gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was used to identify patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, pneumonectomy, pancreatectomy, and colectomy. Individuals were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files and multivariable regression was utilized to assess the association of ADRD with textbook outcome (TO), expenditures, and discharge disposition.

RESULTS

Among 1,175,010 Medicare beneficiaries, 19,406 (1.7%) patients had a preoperative diagnosis of ADRD (CABG: n = 1,643, 8.5%; AAA repair: n = 5,926, 30.5%; pneumonectomy: n = 590, 3.0%; pancreatectomy: n = 181, 0.9%; and colectomy: n = 11,066, 57.0%). After propensity score matching, patients with ADRD were less likely to achieve a TO (ADRD: 31.2% vs. no ADRD: 40.1%) or be discharged to home (ADRD: 26.7% vs. no ADRD: 46.2%) versus patients who did not have ADRD (both p < 0.001). Median index surgery expenditures were higher among patients with ADRD (ADRD: $28,815 [IQR $14,333-$39,273] vs. no ADRD: $27,101 [IQR $13,433-$38,578]; p < 0.001) (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, patients with ADRD had higher odds of postoperative complications (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.25-1.40), extended length-of-stay (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.21-1.32), 90-day readmission (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.31-1.43), and 90-day mortality (OR 1.76, 95% CI 1.66-1.86) (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative diagnosis of ADRD was an independent risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes, discharge to non-home settings, as well as higher healthcare expenditures. These data should serve to inform discussions and decision-making about surgery among the growing number of older patients with cognitive deficits.

Evaluating the caregiver experience during neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is increasingly recommended for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Recent research has highlighted the significant treatment burden that patients experience during NT, but caregiver well-being during NT is poorly understood.

METHODS

A cross-sectional mixed-methods analysis of primary caregivers of patients with localized PDAC receiving NT was undertaken. All patients completed the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer (CQOLC) survey, while semi-structured interviews were conducted among a convenience sample of participants.

RESULTS

Among 28 caregivers, the mean age was 60.1 years, and most were patient spouses/significant others (71.4%). Patients had resectable (18%), borderline resectable (46%), or locally advanced (36%) PDAC with a mean treatment duration of 2.9 months at the time of their caregiver's enrollment. Most caregivers felt that they received adequate emotional/psychosocial support (80%) and understood the rationale for NT (93%). A majority (60%) reported that caregiving responsibilities impacted their daily lives and required a decrease in their work hours, leading to financial challenges (47%). While overall QOL was moderate (mean 83 ± 21.1, range 0-140), "emotional burden" (47.3 ± 20.9), and "positive adaption" (57.3 ± 13.9) were the lowest ranked CQOLC subsection scores.

DISCUSSION

Caregivers of patients with PDAC undergoing NT experience significant emotional symptoms and impact on their daily lives. Assessing caregiver needs and providing resources during NT should be a priority.

Intracystic injection of large surface area microparticle paclitaxel for chemoablation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: Insights from an expanded access protocol

AIMS

A novel large surface area microparticle paclitaxel (LSAM-PTX) has unique properties of long retention in cystic spaces while maintaining high drug concentration. We prospectively evaluated the safety and response of EUS-guided fine needle injection (EUS-FNI) of LSAM-PTX to chemoablate branch duct (BD)-IPMNs.

METHODS

Subjects diagnosed with BD-IPMNs exhibiting at least one worrisome criteria and considered non-surgical were enrolled in a multicenter clinical trial (NCT03188991) and subsequently included in an Expanded Access Protocol (EAP) where they received EUS-FNI of LSAM-PTX (15 mg/mL).

RESULTS

Six BD-IPMNs measuring (mean ± SD) 3.18 ± 0.76 cm in diameter among 5 subjects (mean age: 66 years) were treated by EUS-FNI of LSAM-PTX. A mean of 4 doses of LSAM-PTX (mean dose/cyst: 73 ± 31 mg) were administered, and subjects were followed for up to 32 months. The mean volume reduction/cyst ranged from 42 to 89% (9.58 ± 5.1 ml to 2.2 ± 1.1 ml (p = 0.016)). The mean surface area reduction ranged from 31 to 83% (21.9 ± 8.7 cm2 to 5.7 ± 2.5 cm2 (p = 0.009)). Higher dosing-frequency of EUS-FNI of LSAM-PTX significantly correlated with a reduction in cyst volume (R2 = 0.87, p = 0.03) and surface area (R2 = 0.83, p = 0.04). Comparing pre- and post-ablation samples, molecular analysis of the cyst fluid revealed a loss of IPMN-associated mutations in 5 cases (83.3%), while reemergence was observed in 1 case and persistence in 1 case. Intracystic changes (fibrosis/calcification) were observed in 83.3% (n = 5). One subject developed mild acute pancreatitis (1 of 22 EUS-FNIs of LSAM-PTX).

CONCLUSION

In this EAP, EUS-FNI of LSAM-PTX into BD-IPMNs was safe and resulted in volume and surface area reduction, morphological changes, and loss of pathogenic mutations.

Mediators of racial disparities in postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing complex surgery

BACKGROUND

This study sought to quantify the direct and indirect effects of race on postoperative outcomes after complex surgery.

METHODS

Medicare patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), lung resection or colectomy were identified (2014-2018). Generalized structural equation modelling was utilized to quantify the direct and indirect effects of race on Textbook outcome (TO).

RESULTS

Among 930,033 patients, 46.8% of patients achieved a TO, with Black patients less likely to achieve a TO (referent: White; Black: OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.70-0.73). Notably, 32.3% of the disparities in TO were attributable to race itself, while 67.7% was explained by other factors. Specifically, residential segregation accounted for 39.4% of the lower TO rates among Black patients, while 21.0% was attributable to a high comorbidity burden.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight the need to target structural racism as a policy priority to promote a more equitable healthcare system.

Impact of Medicaid expansion on the multimodal treatment of biliary tract cancer

INTRODUCTION

The impact of Medicaid expansion (ME) on the treatment of patients with cancer remains controversial, especially individuals requiring complex multidisciplinary care. We sought to evaluate the impact of Medicaid expansion (ME) on receipt of multimodal care, including surgical resection, for Stage I-III biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with BTC between 40 and 65 years of age were identified from the National Cancer Database and divided into pre- (2008-2012) and post- (2015-2018) ME cohorts. Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis was used to determine the impact of ME on the utilization of surgery and multimodal chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy treatment for BTC.

RESULTS

Among 12,415 patients with BTC (extrahepatic, n = 5622, 45.3%; intrahepatic, n = 4352, 35.1%; gallbladder, n = 1944, 15.7%; overlapping, n = 497, 4.0%), 5835 (47.0%) and 6580 (53.0%) patients were diagnosed before versus after ME, respectively. Overall utilization of surgery (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26) and multimodality therapy (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.01-1.27) increased in states that adopted ME. Utilization of surgery among uninsured/Medicaid patients in ME states increased relative to patients living in non-ME states (∆+10.1%, p = 0.01). Similarly, the use of multimodal treatment increased among uninsured/Medicaid patients living in ME versus non-ME states (∆+6.4%, p = 0.04); in contrast, there were no difference among patients with other insurance statuses (overall: ∆+1.5%, private: ∆-2.0%, other: ∆+3.9%, all p > 0.5). Uninsured/Medicaid patients with BTC who lived in a ME state had a lower risk of long-term death in the post-ME era (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.98; p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ME positively impacted survival among patients who underwent surgical and multimodal treatment for Stage I-III BTC.

Online artificial intelligence platforms and their applicability to gastrointestinal surgical operations

BACKGROUND

The internet is a common source of health information for patients. Interactive online artificial intelligence (AI) may be a more reliable source of health-related information than traditional search engines. This study aimed to assess the quality and perceived utility of chat-based AI responses related to 3 common gastrointestinal (GI) surgical procedures.

METHODS

A survey of 24 questions covering general perioperative information on cholecystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), and colectomy was created. Each question was posed to Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) in June 2023, and the generated responses were recorded. The quality and perceived utility of responses were independently and subjectively graded by expert respondents specific to each surgical field. Grades were classified as "poor," "fair," "good," "very good," or "excellent."

RESULTS

Among the 45 respondents (general surgeon [n = 13], surgical oncologist [n = 18], colorectal surgeon [n = 13], and transplant surgeon [n = 1]), most practiced at an academic facility (95.6%). Respondents had been in practice for a mean of 12.3 years (general surgeon, 14.5 ± 7.2; surgical oncologist, 12.1 ± 8.2; colorectal surgeon, 10.2 ± 8.0) and performed a mean 53 index operations annually (cholecystectomy, 47 ± 28; PD, 28 ± 27; colectomy, 81 ± 44). Overall, the most commonly assigned quality grade was "fair" or "good" for most responses (n = 622/1080, 57.6%). Most of the 1080 total utility grades were "fair" (n = 279, 25.8%) or "good" (n = 344, 31.9%), whereas only 129 utility grades (11.9%) were "poor." Of note, ChatGPT responses related to cholecystectomy (45.3% ["very good"/"excellent"] vs 18.1% ["poor"/"fair"]) were deemed to be better quality than AI responses about PD (18.9% ["very good"/"excellent"] vs 46.9% ["poor"/"fair"]) or colectomy (31.4% ["very good"/"excellent"] vs 38.3% ["poor"/"fair"]). Overall, only 20.0% of the experts deemed ChatGPT to be an accurate source of information, whereas 15.6% of the experts found it unreliable. Moreover, 1 in 3 surgeons deemed ChatGPT responses as not likely to reduce patient-physician correspondence (31.1%) or not comparable to in-person surgeon responses (35.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a potential resource for patient education, ChatGPT responses to common GI perioperative questions were deemed to be of only modest quality and utility to patients. In addition, the relative quality of AI responses varied markedly on the basis of procedure type.

Variations in Travel Patterns Affect Regionalization of Complex Cancer Surgery in California

INTRODUCTION

Regionalization of complex surgical procedures may improve healthcare quality. We sought to define the impact of regionalization on access to high-volume hospitals for complex oncologic procedures in the state of California.

METHODS

The California Department of Health Care Access and Information Database (2012-2016) identified patients who underwent esophagectomy (ES), pneumonectomy (PN), pancreatectomy (PA), or proctectomy (PR). Geospatial analysis was conducted to determine travel patterns. Clustered multivariable regression was performed to assess the probability of receiving care at a high-volume center.

RESULTS

Among 25,070 patients (ES: n = 1216, 4.9%; PN: n = 13,247, 52.8%; PD: n = 3559, 14.2%; PR: n = 7048, 28.1%), 6575 (26.2%) individuals resided within 30 min, 11,046 (44.1%) resided within 30-60 min, 7125 (28.4%) resided within 60-90 min, and 324 (1.3%) resided beyond a 90-min travel window from a high-volume center. Median travel distance was 13.4 miles (interquartile range [IQR] 6.0-28.7). On multivariable regression, patients residing further away were more likely to bypass a low-volume center to undergo care at a high-volume hospital (odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.12-1.55) versus individuals residing closer to high-volume centers. Approximately one-third (29.7%) of patients lived beyond a 1-h travel window to the nearest high-volume hospital, of whom 5% traveled over 90 min. While hospital mortality rates across different travel time windows did not differ, surgery at a high-volume center was associated with an overall 1.2% decrease in in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Regionalization of complex cancer surgery may be associated with a significant travel burden for a large subset of patients with complex cancer.

Impact of Community Privilege on Access to Care Among Patients Following Complex Cancer Surgery

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define the impact of community privilege on variations in travel patterns and access to care at high-volume hospitals for complex surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND

With increased emphasis on centralization of high-risk surgery, social determinants of health play a critical role in preventing equitable access to care. Privilege is a right, benefit, advantage, or opportunity that positively impacts all social determinants of health.

METHODS

The California Office of State-wide Health Planning Database identified patients who underwent esophagectomy (ES), pneumonectomy (PN), pancreatectomy (PA), or proctectomy (PR) for a malignant diagnosis between 2012 and 2016 and was merged using ZIP codes with the Index of Concentration of Extremes, a validated metric of both spatial polarization and privilege obtained from the American Community Survey. Clustered multivariable regression was performed to assess the probability of undergoing care at a high-volume center, bypassing the nearest and high-volume center, and total real driving time and travel distance.

RESULTS

Among 25,070 patients who underwent a complex oncologic operation (ES: n=1216, 4.9%; PN: n=13,247, 52.8%; PD: n=3559, 14.2%; PR: n=7048, 28.1%), 5019 (20.0%) individuals resided in areas with the highest privilege (i.e., White, high-income homogeneity), whereas 4994 (19.9%) individuals resided in areas of the lowest privilege (i.e., Black, low-income homogeneity). Median travel distance was 33.1 miles (interquartile range 14.4-72.2). Roughly, three-quarters of patients (overall: 74.8%, ES: 35.0%; PN: 74.3%; PD: 75.2%; PR: 82.2%) sought surgical care at a high-volume center. On multivariable regression, patients residing in the least advantaged communities were less likely to undergo surgery at a high-volume hospital (overall: odds ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.52-0.81). Of note, individuals in the least privileged areas had longer travel distances (28.5 miles, 95% CI 21.2-35.8) to reach the destination facility, as well as over 70% greater odds of bypassing a high-volume hospital to undergo surgical care at a low-volume center (odds ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.34) versus individuals living in the highest privileged areas.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Privilege had a marked effect on access to complex oncologic surgical care at high-volume centers. These data highlight the need to focus on privilege as a key social determinant of health that influences patient access to and utilization of health care resources.

Association of Race/Ethnicity, Persistent Poverty, and Opioid Access Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Near the End of Life

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact access to healthcare. We sought to assess the association between persistent poverty (PP), race/ethnicity, and opioid access among patients with gastrointestinal cancer near the end-of-life (EOL).

METHODS

SEER-Medicare patients with gastric, liver, pancreatic, biliary, colon, and rectal cancer were identified between 2008 and 2016 near EOL, defined as 30 days before death or hospice enrolment. Data were linked with county-level poverty from the American Community Survey and the US Department of Agriculture (2000-2015). Counties were categorized as never high-poverty (NHP), intermittent high-poverty (IHP) and persistent poverty (PP). Trends in opioid prescription fills and daily dosages (morphine milligram equivalents per day) were examined.

RESULTS

Among 48,631 Medicare beneficiaries (liver: n = 6551, 13.5%; pancreas: n = 13,559, 27.9%; gastric: n = 5486, 1.3%; colorectal: n = 23,035, 47.4%), there was a steady decrease in opioid prescriptions near EOL. Black, Asian, Hispanic, and other racial groups had markedly decreased odds of filling an opioid prescription near EOL (Black: OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.90; Asian: OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94; Hispanic: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.95; Other: OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93; all p < 0.05). Even after filling an opioid prescription, this subset of patients received lower daily doses versus White patients (Black: -16.5 percentage points, 95% CI -21.2 to -11.6; Asian: -11.9 percentage points, 95% CI -18.5 to -4.9; Hispanic: -19.1 percentage points, 95%CI -23.5 to -14.6; all p < 0.05). The disparity in opioid access and average daily doses among was attenuated in IHP/PP areas for Asian, Hispanic, and other racial groups, yet exacerbated among Black patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Race/ethnicity-based disparities in EOL pain management persist with SDoH-based variations in EOL opioid use. In particular, PP impacted EOL opioid access and utilization.

Association of Textbook Outcome and Hospital Volume with Long-Term Survival Following Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Matters More?

BACKGROUND

Both textbook outcome (TO) and hospital volume have been identified as quality metrics following cancer surgery. We sought to examine whether TO or hospital volume is more important relative to long-term survival following surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for HCC between 2004 and 2018 were identified using the National Cancer Database. TO was defined as R0 margin resection, no extended length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 90-day mortality. The impact of TO and hospital case volume on long-term survival was determined using multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Among 24,895 patients who underwent HCC resection, 9.0% (n = 2,252), 79.5% (n = 19,787), and 11.5% (n = 2,856) of patients were operated on at low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. Treatment at high-volume hospitals and achievement of a post-operative TO were independently associated with improved 5-year overall survival (OS). Pairwise comparison demonstrated that patients treated at high-volume hospitals who did not achieve a TO still had a better 5-year OS versus individuals treated at low-volume hospitals who did achieve a TO (5-year OS, no TO vs. TO: low-volume hospitals, 26.5% vs. 48.6%; high volume hospitals: 62.6% vs. 74.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, resection of HCC at a high-volume hospital was independently associated with a 54% reduction in mortality.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival following HCC resection was largely associated with hospital case volume rather than TO. The effect of TO on long-term outcomes was largely mediated by hospital case volume highlighting the importance of centralization of care for patients with HCC.

Postoperative Liver Failure: Definitions, Risk factors, Prediction Models and Prevention Strategies

BACKGROUND

Liver resection is the treatment for a variety of benign and malignant conditions. Despite advances in preoperative selection, surgical technique, and perioperative management, post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following liver resection.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed utilizing MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases in May of 2023. The MESH terms "liver failure," "liver insufficiency," and "hepatic failure" in combination with "liver surgery," "liver resection," and "hepatectomy" were searched in the title and/or abstract. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional eligible publications.

RESULTS

PHLF can have devastating physiological consequences. In general, risk factors can be categorized as patient-related, primary liver function-related, or perioperative factors. Currently, no effective treatment options are available and the management of PHLF is largely supportive. Therefore, identifying risk factors and preventative strategies for PHLF is paramount. Ensuring an adequate future liver remnant is important to mitigate risk of PHLF. Dynamic liver function tests provide more objective assessment of liver function based on the metabolic capacity of the liver and have the advantage of easy administration, low cost, and easy reproducibility.

CONCLUSION

Given the absence of randomized data specifically related to the management of PHLF, current strategies are based on the principles of management of acute liver failure from any cause. In addition, goal-directed therapy for organ dysfunction, as well as identification and treatment of reversible factors in the postoperative period are critical.

Persistent poverty impacts access to minimally invasive surgery among patients with hepatopancreatobiliary cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been successfully adopted in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancer, and has been associated with improved perioperative and comparable oncological outcomes. We sought to define the impact of county-level duration of poverty on access to MIS and clinical outcomes among patients with HPB cancer undergoing surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on patients diagnosed with HPB cancer were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data (2010-2016). County-level poverty data were obtained from the American Community Survey and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and categorized into three groups: never high poverty (NHP), intermittent high poverty (IHP), and persistent poverty (PP). Multivariable regression was used to assess the relationship between PP and MIS.

RESULTS

Among 8098 patients, 82% (n = 664) resided in regions with NHP, 13.6% (n = 1104) resided in regions with IHP, and 4.4% (n = 350) resided in regions with PP. Median age at the diagnosis was 71 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 67-77). Patients from IHP and PP counties had lower odds of undergoing MIS (IHP/PP vs. NHP, odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-0.96, p = 0.034) and being discharged home (IHP/PP vs. NHP, OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43-0.99, p = 0.043), as well as a higher risk of 1-year mortality (IHP/PP vs. NHP, HR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.036-2.209, p = 0.032) compared with patients residing in NHP counties.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of county-level poverty was associated with lower receipt of MIS and unfavorable clinical and survival outcomes among patients with HPB cancer. There is a need to improve access to modern surgical treatment options among vulnerable, PP populations.

Aborted cancer surgery at a single tertiary cancer center: Rates, reasons, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection is typically necessary for curative-intent treatment of most solid organ cancers. However, even with meticulous preoperative evaluation, operative procedures are occasionally aborted. The incidence, outcomes, and long-term prognoses of aborted cancer surgery have not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

All oncologic operations performed at a single tertiary cancer center between 2011-2021 were retrospectively queried; natural language processing of operative reports was used to identify aborted cancer surgeries. Surgical indications, clinicopathologic characteristics, short- and long-term outcomes, and palliative care involvement were retrospectively reviewed from the electronic medical record.

RESULTS

Overall, 345 patients underwent aborted cancer surgery for a rate of 36 patients per year. The most common cancers were pancreatic (28%), biliary (14%), and colorectal (9%). The most commonly aborted operations were pancreatoduodenectomy (34%) and hepatectomy (22%). Most operations were aborted due to unanticipated tumor unresectability (47%) and occult metastatic disease (43%). Sixty percent of patients returned to cancer-directed therapy; 9% underwent successful reattempt at resection. The median overall survival of all patients after aborted surgery was 13.6 months (95% confidence interval, 11.2-16.0 months). Those who returned to oncologic therapy had longer survival (18.6 months vs 5.4 months, P < .001). Palliative care consultation was received by 34% and 13% of patients overall and within 30 days of surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Aborted cancer surgery was associated with poor outcomes, particularly in patients with aggressive cancer types and those who did not receive further cancer-directed therapy. Future studies should identify interventions such as palliative care consultation that may improve patient-centered outcomes.

Impact of Food Insecurity on Outcomes Following Resection of Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Food insecurity (FI) may predispose individuals to suboptimal nutrition, leading to chronic disease and poor health outcomes. We sought to assess the impact of county-level FI on postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing resection of hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) cancer.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed with HPB cancer between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Data on annual county-level FI were obtained from the Feeding America: Mapping the Meal Gap report and were categorized into tertiles. Textbook outcome was defined as no extended length of stay, perioperative complications, 90-day readmission, and 90-day mortality. Multiple logistic regression and Cox regression models were used to assess outcomes and survival relative to FI.

RESULTS

Among 49,882 patients (hepatocellular: n = 11,937, 23.9%; intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: n = 2111, 4.2%; extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: n = 4047, 8.1%; gallbladder: n = 2853, 5.7%; pancreatic: n = 28,934, 58.0%), 6702 (13.4%) patients underwent a surgical resection. Median age was 75 years (interquartile range 69-82), and most patients were male (n = 25,767, 51.7%) and self-identified as White (n = 36,381, 72.9%). Overall, 5291 (10.6%) and 39,664 (79.5%) individuals resided in low or moderate FI counties, respectively, while 4927 (9.8%) patients resided in high FI counties. Achievement of textbook outcome (TO) was 56.3% (n = 6702). After adjusting for competing risk factors, patients residing in high FI counties had lower odds to achieve a TO versus individuals living in low FI counties (odds ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.88, p = 0.003). In addition, patients residing in moderate and high FI counties had a greater risk of mortality at 1- (referent, low, moderate: hazard ratio [HR] 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14; high: HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21), 3- (referent, low, moderate: HR 1.09, 95% CI 1.05-1.14; high: HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21), and 5- (referent, low, moderate: HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09; high: HR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13) years versus individuals from low FI counties.

CONCLUSIONS

FI was associated with adverse perioperative outcomes and long-term survival following resection of an HPB malignancy. Interventions directed towards mitigating nutritional inequities are needed to improve outcomes among vulnerable HPB populations.

Association of Historical Redlining and Present-Day Social Vulnerability with Cancer Screening

BACKGROUND

The Healthy People 2030 initiative has set national cancer screening targets at 77.1%, 74.4%, and 84.3% for breast, colon, and cervical cancers, respectively. We sought to assess the association between historical redlining relative and present-day social vulnerability on screening targets for breast, colon, and cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Data on national census-tract level cancer screening prevalence and social vulnerability index in 2020 was extracted from the CDC PLACES and CDC social vulnerability index databases, respectively. Census tracts were then assigned Home-Owners Loan Corporation grades (A: "Best", B: "Still Desirable", C: "Definitely Declining," and D: "Hazardous/Redlined"). Mixed-effects logistic regression and mediation analyses were conducted to evaluate the association between Home-Owners Loan Corporation grades and achievement of cancer screening targets.

RESULT

Among 11,831 census tracts, 3,712 were classified as redlined (A: n = 842, 7.1% vs B: n = 2,314, 19.6% vs C: n = 4,963, 42.0% vs D: n = 3,712, 31.4%). Notably, 62.8% (n = 7,427), 21.2% (n = 2,511), and 27.3% (n = 3,235) of tracts met screening targets for breast, colon, and cervical cancer, respectively. After adjusting for present-day social vulnerability index and access to care metrics (population to primary care physician ratio and distance to nearest healthcare facility), redlined tracts were markedly less likely to meet breast (odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.91), colon (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.41), and cervical (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.27) cancer screening targets compared with the "Best" tracts. Notably, poverty, lack of education, and limited English proficiency, among others, mediated the adverse effect of historical redlining on cancer screening.

CONCLUSIONS

Redlining as a surrogate for structural racism continues to adversely impact cancer screening. Policies that aim to make access to preventive cancer care more equitable for historically marginalized communities should be a public priority.

The Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Care

INTRODUCTION

The impact of Medicaid expansion (ME) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial, and heterogeneous effects on care processes may relate to sociodemographic factors. We sought to evaluate the association between ME and receipt of surgery in early-stage HCC.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with early-stage HCC between 40 and 64 years of age were identified from the National Cancer Database and divided into pre- (2004-2012) and post- (2015-2017) expansion cohorts. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of surgical treatment. Difference-in-difference (DID) analysis assessed changes in surgical treatment between patients living in ME and non-ME states.

RESULTS

Among 19,745 patients, 12,220 (61.9%) were diagnosed before ME and 7525 (38.1%) after. Although overall utilization of surgery decreased after expansion (ME, pre-expansion: 62.2% versus post-expansion: 51.6%; non-ME, pre-expansion: 62.1% versus post-expansion: 50.8%, p < 0.001), this trend varied relative to insurance status. Notably, receipt of surgery increased among uninsured/Medicaid patients living in ME states after expansion (pre-expansion: 48.1%, post-expansion: 52.3%, p < 0.001). Moreover, treatment at academic or high-volume facilities increased the likelihood of undergoing surgery before expansion. After expansion, treatment at an academic facility and living in an ME state (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.54, p < 0.01) were predictors of surgical treatment. DID analysis demonstrated increased utilization of surgery for uninsured/Medicaid patients living in ME states relative to non-ME states (uninsured/Medicaid: 6.4%, p < 0.05), although no differences were noted among patients with other insurance statuses (overall: 0.7%, private: -2.0%, other: 0.3%, all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of ME heterogeneously impacted utilization of care in early-stage HCC. Notably, uninsured/Medicaid patients residing in ME states demonstrated increased utilization of surgical treatment after expansion.

Disparities in Socioeconomic Factors Mediate the Impact of Racial Segregation Among Patients With Hepatopancreaticobiliary Cancer

BACKGROUND

Structural racism within the U.S. health care system contributes to disparities in oncologic care. This study sought to examine the socioeconomic factors that underlie the impact of racial segregation on hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) cancer inequities.

METHODS

Both Black and White patients who presented with HPB cancer were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2005-2015) and 2010 Census data. The Index of Dissimilarity (IoD), a validated measure of segregation, was examined relative to cancer stage at diagnosis, surgical resection, and overall mortality. Principal component analysis and structural equation modeling were used to determine the mediating effect of socioeconomic factors.

RESULTS

Among 39,063 patients, 86.4 % (n = 33,749) were White and 13.6 % (n = 5314) were Black. Black patients were more likely to reside in segregated areas than White patients (IoD, 0.62 vs. 0.52; p < 0.05). Black patients in highly segregated areas were less likely to present with early-stage disease (relative risk [RR], 0.89; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.95) or undergo surgery for localized disease (RR, 0.81; 95% CI 0.70-0.91), and had greater mortality hazards (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% CI 1.06-1.17) than White patients in low segregation areas (all p < 0.05). Mediation analysis identified poverty, lack of insurance, education level, crowded living conditions, commute time, and supportive income as contributing to 25 % of the disparities in early-stage presentation. Average income, house price, and income mobility explained 17 % of the disparities in surgical resection. Notably, average income, house price, and income mobility mediated 59 % of the effect that racial segregation had on long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

Racial segregation, mediated through underlying socioeconomic factors, accounted for marked disparities in access to surgical care and outcomes for patients with HPB cancer.

Disparities in NCCN Guideline-Compliant Care for Patients with Early-Stage Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma at Minority-Serving versus Non-Minority-Serving Hospitals

BACKGROUND

Racial/ethnic disparities in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) outcomes may relate to receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-compliant care. We assessed the association between treatment at minority-serving hospitals (MSH) and receipt of NCCN-compliant care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of early-stage PDAC between 2006 and 2019 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). MSH was defined as the top decile of facilities treating minority ethnicities (Black and/or Hispanic). Factors associated with receipt of NCCN-compliant care and its impact on overall survival (OS) were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 44,873 patients who underwent resection of PDAC, most were treated at non-MSH (n = 42,571, 94.9%), while a smaller subset were treated at MSH (n = 2302, 5.1%). Patients treated at MSH were more likely to be at a younger median age (MSH 66 years versus non-MSH 67 years), Black or Hispanic (MSH 58.4% versus non-MSH 12.0%), and not insured (MSH 7.8% versus non-MSH 1.6%). While 71.7% (n = 31,182) of patients were compliant with NCCN care, guideline-compliant care was lower at MSH (MSH 62.5% versus non-MSH 72.2%). On multivariable analysis, receiving care at MSH was associated with not receiving guideline-compliant care [odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.74]. At non-MSH, non-white patients had lower odds of receiving guideline-compliant PDCA care (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.91). Failure to comply was associated with worse overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% CI 1.46-1.54, all p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PDAC treated at MSH and minorities treated at non-MSH were less likely to receive NCCN-compliant care. Failure to comply with guideline-based PDAC treatment was associated with worse OS.

Suicidal Ideation Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Mental illness (MI) and suicidal ideation (SI) often are associated with a diagnosis of cancer. We sought to define the incidence of MI and SI among patients with gastrointestinal cancers, as well as ascertain the predictive factors associated with SI.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 with stomach, liver, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer were identified from the SEER-Medicare database. County-level social vulnerability index (SVI) was extracted from the Centers for Disease Control database. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with SI.

RESULTS

Among 382,266 patients, 83,514 (21.9%) individuals had a diagnosis of MI. Only 1410 (0.4%) individuals experienced SI, and 359 (0.1%) committed suicide. Interestingly, SI was least likely among patients with pancreatic cancer (ref: hepatic cancer; odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.86; p = 0.002), as well as individuals with stage III/IV disease (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.52-067; p < 0.001). In contrast, male (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.50), White (OR 1.34, CI 1.13-1.59), and single (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.81-2.28) patients were at higher odds of SI risk (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, individuals living in relative privilege (low SVI) had markedly higher risk of SI (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.54; p < 0.001). Moreover, living in a county with a shortage of mental health professionals was associated with increased odds of developing SI (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.04-1.40; p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Oncology care teams should incorporate routine mental health and SI screening in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancers, as well as target suicide prevention towards patients at highest risk.

Ampullary Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Ampullary cancers refer to tumors originating from the ampulla of Vater (the ampulla, the intraduodenal portion of the bile duct, and the intraduodenal portion of the pancreatic duct), while periampullary cancers may arise from locations encompassing the head of the pancreas, distal bile duct, duodenum, or ampulla of Vater. Ampullary cancers are rare gastrointestinal malignancies, and prognosis varies greatly based on factors such as patient age, TNM classification, differentiation grade, and treatment modality received. Systemic therapy is used in all stages of ampullary cancer, including neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, and first-line or subsequent-line therapy for locally advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease. Radiation therapy may be used in localized ampullary cancer, sometimes in combination with chemotherapy, but there is no high-level evidence to support its utility. Select tumors may be treated surgically. This article describes NCCN recommendations regarding management of ampullary adenocarcinoma.

Current Landscape of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The liver maintains a balance between immune tolerance and activation in its role as a filtration system. Chronic inflammation disrupts this immune microenvironment, thereby allowing for the rise and progression of cancer. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a liver tumor generally diagnosed in the setting of chronic liver disease. When diagnosed early, the primary treatment is surgical resection, liver transplantation, or liver directed therapies. Unfortunately, patients with HCC often present at an advanced stage or with poor liver function, thereby limiting options. To further complicate matters, most systemic therapies are relatively limited and ineffective among patients with advanced disease. Recently, the IMbrave150 trial demonstrated that the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab was associated with better survival compared to sorafenib among patients with advanced HCC. As such, atezolizumab and bevacizumab is now recommended first-line therapy for these patients. Tumor cells work to create an immunotolerant environment by preventing the activation of stimulatory immunoreceptors and upregulating expression of proteins that bind inhibitory immunoreceptors. ICIs work to block these interactions and bolster the anti-tumor function of the immune system. We herein provide an overview of the use of ICIs in the treatment of HCC.

Piperacillin-Tazobactam Compared With Cefoxitin as Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Despite improvements in perioperative mortality, the incidence of postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) remains high after pancreatoduodenectomy. The effect of broad-spectrum antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis in reducing SSI is poorly understood.

Objective

To define the effect of broad-spectrum perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis on postoperative SSI incidence compared with standard care antibiotics.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Pragmatic, open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 clinical trial at 26 hospitals across the US and Canada. Participants were enrolled between November 2017 and August 2021, with follow-up through December 2021. Adults undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy for any indication were eligible. Individuals were excluded if they had allergies to study medications, active infections, chronic steroid use, significant kidney dysfunction, or were pregnant or breastfeeding. Participants were block randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by the presence of a preoperative biliary stent. Participants, investigators, and statisticians analyzing trial data were unblinded to treatment assignment.

Intervention

The intervention group received piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 or 4 g intravenously) as perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis, while the control group received cefoxitin (2 g intravenously; standard care).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was development of postoperative SSI within 30 days. Secondary end points included 30-day mortality, development of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, and sepsis. All data were collected as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Results

The trial was terminated at an interim analysis on the basis of a predefined stopping rule. Of 778 participants (378 in the piperacillin-tazobactam group [median age, 66.8 y; 233 {61.6%} men] and 400 in the cefoxitin group [median age, 68.0 y; 223 {55.8%} men]), the percentage with SSI at 30 days was lower in the perioperative piperacillin-tazobactam vs cefoxitin group (19.8% vs 32.8%; absolute difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -19.1% to -6.9%]; P < .001). Participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam, vs cefoxitin, had lower rates of postoperative sepsis (4.2% vs 7.5%; difference, -3.3% [95% CI, -6.6% to 0.0%]; P = .02) and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (12.7% vs 19.0%; difference, -6.3% [95% CI, -11.4% to -1.2%]; P = .03). Mortality rates at 30 days were 1.3% (5/378) among participants treated with piperacillin-tazobactam and 2.5% (10/400) among those receiving cefoxitin (difference, -1.2% [95% CI, -3.1% to 0.7%]; P = .32).

Conclusions and Relevance

In participants undergoing open pancreatoduodenectomy, use of piperacillin-tazobactam as perioperative prophylaxis reduced postoperative SSI, pancreatic fistula, and multiple downstream sequelae of SSI. The findings support the use of piperacillin-tazobactam as standard care for open pancreatoduodenectomy.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03269994.

Calcifications and Cystic Morphology on Preoperative Imaging Predict Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Radiographic calcifications and cystic morphology are associated with higher and lower tumor grade, respectively, in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Whether calcifications and/or cystic morphology could be used preoperatively to predict post-resection survival in patients with PNETs remains elusive.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative-intent resection of well-differentiated PNETs from 2000 to 2017 at eight academic institutions participating in the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group were identified. Preoperative cross-sectional imaging reports were reviewed to identify the presence of calcifications and of a cystic component occupying >50% of the total tumor area. Clinicopathologic characteristics and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 981 patients studied, 18% had calcifications and 17% had cystic tumors. Tumors with calcifications were more commonly associated with Ki-67 ≥3% (47% vs. 33%; p = 0.029), lymph node metastasis (36% vs. 24%; p = 0.011), and distant metastasis (13% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). In contrast, cystic tumors were less commonly associated with lymph node metastasis (12% vs. 30%; p < 0.001). Five-year RFS after resection was most favorable for cystic tumors without calcifications (91%), intermediate for solid tumors without calcifications (77%), and least favorable for any calcified PNET (solid 69%, cystic 67%; p = 0.043). Calcifications remained an independent predictor of RFS on multivariable analysis (p = 0.043) controlling for nodal (p < 0.001) and distant metastasis (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Easily detectable radiographic features, such as calcifications and cystic morphology, can be used preoperatively to stratify prognosis in patients with PNETs and possibly inform the decision to operate or not, as well as guide the extent of resection and potential use of neoadjuvant therapy.

The impact of digital inequities on gastrointestinal cancer disparities in the United States

BACKGROUND

Modern-day internet access and technology usage substantially impacts aspects of surgical care but remain ill-defined for their associations with gastrointestinal-cancer (GIC) outcomes. We sought to develop the Digital Inequity Index (DII), a novel, a self-adapted tool to quantify access to digital resources, to assess the impact of "digital inequity" on GIC care and prognosis.

METHODS

Adult (20+) patients with gastrointestinal malignancies between 2013 and 2017 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database. DII was calculated based on 17 census-tract level variables derived from the American Community Survey and Federal Communications Commission. Variables were categorized as infrastructure-access (i.e., electronic device ownership, broadband type, internet provider availability, income-broadband subscription ratio) or sociodemographic (i.e., education, income, disability status), ranked relative across all US counties, and then averaged into a composite score. The association between DII and surgery receipt, staging, surveillance period, and survival time were assessed with multiple logistic and linear regressions.

RESULTS

Among 287 228 patients, increasing DII was associated with increased odds of late-stage disease (highest odds ratio [OR]: 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.10 for hepatic) and decreased odds of receiving surgery (lowest OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96 for hepatic). Higher DII was associated with shorter postoperative surveillance length (largest decrease -20.4% for hepatic) and overall survival length (largest decrease -16.0% for pancreatic). Sociodemographic and infrastructure-access factors contributed equivalently to surveillance time disparities, while infrastructure-access factors contributed more to survival disparities across GIC types.

CONCLUSIONS

As technology dependence has increased, inequities in digital access should be targeted as a contributor to surgical oncologic disparities.

Mediators of county-level racial and economic privilege in cancer screening

BACKGROUND

Area-level social determinants of health (SDoH) impact access to cancer care and prevention. Little is known about the factors that underlie the impact of residential privilege on county-level cancer screening uptake.

METHODS

Population-based cross-sectional study examining county-level data was obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's PLACES database, American Community Survey and the County Health Rankings and Roadmap database. The Index of Concentration of Extremes (ICE), a validated measure of racial and economic privilege, was examined relative to county-level rates of US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guideline-concordant screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Generalized structural equation modeling was used to determine the indirect and direct effects of ICE on cancer screening uptake.

RESULTS

Across 3142 counties, county-level cancer screening rates demonstrated geographical variation ranging from 54.0% to 81.8% for breast cancer screening, from 39.8% to 74.4% for colorectal cancer screening, and from 69.9% to 89.7% for cervical cancer screening. Of note, cancer screening rates for breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer all increased from lower (ICE-Q1) to higher (ICE-Q4) privileged areas (breast: Q1 = 71.0% vs. Q4 = 72.2%; colorectal: Q1 = 59.4% vs. Q4 = 65.0%; cervical: Q1 = 83.3% vs. Q4 = 85.2%; all p < 0.001). Mediation analysis revealed that the observed disparities between ICE and cancer screening uptake were explained by mediators such as poverty status, lack of health insurance or employment, urban-rural location and access to primary care physicians that accounted for 64% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61%-67%), 85% (95% CI: 80%-89%), and 74% (95% CI: 71%-77%) of the effect on breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cross-sectional study, the association between racial and economic privilege on USPSTF-recommended cancer screening was complex and influenced by an interplay of sociodemographic, geographical, and structural factors. Understanding the underlying area-level SDoH that mediate disparities in cancer prevention strategies can help focus interventions to improve equity in cancer prevention.

The implications of fragmented practice in hepatopancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Familiarity with the surgical work environment has been demonstrated to improve outcomes. We sought to investigate the impact of the rate of fragmented practice on textbook outcomes, a validated composite outcome representing an "optimal" postoperative course.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a hepatic or pancreatic surgical procedure between 2013 and 2017 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. The rate of fragmented practice was defined as the surgeon's volume over the study period relative to the number of facilities practiced at. The association between the rate of fragmented practice and textbook outcomes was assessed using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 37,599 patients were included (pancreatic: n = 23,701, 63.0%; hepatic: n = 13,898, 37.0%). After controlling for relevant characteristics, patients who underwent surgery by surgeons in higher rate of fragmented practice categories had lower odds of achieving a textbook outcome (reference: low rate of fragmented practice; intermediate rate of fragmented practice: odds ratio = 0.88 [95% confidence interval 0.84-0.93]; high rate of fragmented practice: odds ratio = 0.58 [95% confidence interval 0.54-0.61]) (both P < .001). Of note, the adverse effect of a high rate of fragmented practice on the achievement of textbook outcomes remained substantial, regardless of the county-level social vulnerability index [high rate of fragmented practice; low social vulnerability index: odds ratio = 0.58 (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.66); intermediate social vulnerability index: odds ratio = 0.56 (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.61); high social vulnerability index: odds ratio = 0.60 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.68)] (all P < .001). Patients in intermediate and high social vulnerability index counties had 19% and 37% greater odds of undergoing surgery by a high rate of fragmented practice surgeon (reference: low social vulnerability index; intermediate social vulnerability index: odds ratio = 1.19 [95% confidence interval 1.12-1.26]; high social vulnerability index: odds ratio = 1.37 [95% confidence interval 1.28-1.46]).

CONCLUSION

Owing to the impact of the rate of fragmented practice on postoperative outcomes, decreasing fragmentation of care may be an important target for quality initiatives and a means to alleviate social disparities in surgical care.

Achieving an optimal textbook outcome following pancreatic resection: The impact of surgeon specific experience in achieving high quality outcomes

BACKGROUND

The interplay of patient-, procedural, and provider-level factors on the ability to achieve a textbook outcome(TO) remain poorly defined.

METHODS

The Medicare Standard Analytical Files from 2013 to 2017 were used to identify beneficiaries who underwent pancreatic surgery. Multivariable logistic regression with mixed effects was used to examine the role of the individual surgeon relative to patient- and procedural-factors to achieve a TO.

RESULTS

Among 20,902 patients who underwent pancreatic resection, median age was 72 years (IQR:68-77); roughly one-half of the cohort was female(47,4%) and the majority was White (89.3%). After controlling for patient- and procedure-related characteristics, there was 35% variation in odds of experiencing a TO relative to the specific individual surgeon who performed the operation (OR:1.35, 95%CI:1.29-1.41). Patients who underwent pancreatectomy by a bottom TO quartile surgeon had a higher observed/expected ratio for each component of TO including post-operative complication (OR:2.62, 95%CI:2.11-3.25), prolonged LOS (OR:3.36, 95%CI:2.67-4.22), 90-day readmission (OR:2.08, 95%CI:1.68-2.56), and 90-day mortality (OR:3.29, 95% CI:2.35-4.63) compared with patients treated by a high TO quartile surgeon.

CONCLUSION

The likelihood of achieving a TO after pancreatic resection was markedly influenced by the individual treating surgeon even after controlling for patient- and procedure-level factors.

Hepatopancreatic Surgeons Versus Pancreatic Surgeons: Does Surgical Subspecialization Impact Patient Care and Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatic (HP) surgeon and hospital procedural volume may vary relative to liver or pancreas cases. We sought to investigate the impact of surgeon and hospital pancreatic subspecialization on patient outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatic surgery between 2013-2017 were identified from the Medicare Standard Analytic Files. The surgery subspecialization index (SSI) was calculated to signify surgeon and hospital pancreatic subspecialization, and categorized as low, intermediate, and high SSI. The association of SSI with Textbook Outcome (TO) and its components, failure to rescue (FTR), discharge to home and index admission expenditures was assessed with mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 19,625 patients, most pancreatic procedures were characterized by high SSI (Low SSI: 27.7%, Intermediate SSI: 34.7%, High SSI: 37.7%). Notably, higher SSI was associated with greater odds of achieving a TO [Intermediate SSI: OR 1.16 (95%CI 1.06-1.27); High SSI: OR 1.23 (95%CI 1.11-1.35)] as well as being discharged home, and  lower odds of experiencing FTR. Furthermore, this association persisted in both low-volume [referent: Low SSI; Intermediate SSI: OR 1.14 (95%CI 1.01-1.28); High SSI: OR 1.15 (95%CI 1.02-1.31)] and high-volume hospitals [referent: Low SSI; Intermediate SSI: OR 1.16 (95%CI 1.01-1.32); High SSI: OR 1.26 (95%CI 1.09-1.45)].

CONCLUSIONS

Greater pancreatic subspecialization was associated with improved postoperative outcomes following pancreatic resection. Amidst increasing efforts to improve quality of care, surgical subspecialization may play a role in determining patient outcomes regardless of total surgeon or hospital volume.

Surgical resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly being used before surgery for localized pancreatic cancer. Given the importance of completing multimodal therapy, the aim of this study was to characterize surgical resection rates after neoadjuvant therapy as well as the reasons for, and long-term prognostic impact of, not undergoing resection.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective trials and high-quality retrospective studies since 2010 was performed to calculate pooled resection rates using a generalized random-effects model for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Median survival times were calculated using random-effects models for patients who did and did not undergo resection.

RESULTS

In 125 studies that met the inclusion criteria, neoadjuvant therapy consisted of chemotherapy (36.8 per cent), chemoradiation (15.2 per cent), or chemotherapy and radiation (48.0 per cent). Among 11 713 patients, the pooled resection rates were 77.4 (95 per cent c.i. 71.3 to 82.5), 60.6 (54.8 to 66.1), and 22.2 (16.7 to 29.0) per cent for potentially resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced pancreatic cancer respectively. The most common reasons for not undergoing resection were distant progression for resectable and borderline resectable cancers, and local unresectability for locally advanced disease. Among 42 studies with survival data available, achieving surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival for patients with potentially resectable (median 38.5 versus 13.3 months), borderline resectable (32.3 versus 13.9 months), and locally advanced (30.0 versus 14.6 months) pancreatic cancer (P < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Although rates of surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy vary based on anatomical stage, surgery is associated with improved survival for all patients with localized pancreatic cancer. These pooled resection and survival rates may inform patient-provider decision-making and serve as important benchmarks for future prospective trials.

Textbook oncologic outcomes and regionalization among patients undergoing hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) and its association with regionalization of care for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have not been evaluated.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent hepatic resection for ICC between 2004 and 2018 from the National Cancer Database. Facilities were categorized by annual hepatectomy volume for ICC. TOO was defined as no 90-day mortality, margin-negative resection, no prolonged hospitalization, no 30-day readmission, receipt of appropriate adjuvant therapy, and adequate lymphadenectomy. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association between annual hepatectomy volume and TOO.

RESULTS

A total of 5359 patients underwent liver resection for ICC. TOO was achieved in 11.2% (n = 599) of patients. Inadequate lymphadenectomy was the largest impediment to achieving TOO. After adjusting for patient, pathologic, and facility characteristics, high volume facilities had 67% increased odds of achieving TOO (Ref.: low volume; high volume: odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-2.25; p < 0.001). Patients treated at high-volume centers who achieved a TOO had better overall survival (OS) versus patients treated at low-volume facilities (low volume vs. high volume; median OS, 47.3 vs. 71.1 months, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A composite oncologic measure, TOO, provides a comprehensive insight into the performance of liver resection and regionalization of surgical care for ICC.

Comparing Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: a Win Ratio Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Despite its rising adoption, the use of minimally invasive (MIS) pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in the treatment of pancreatic cancer remains controversial. We sought to compare MIS and open PD for pancreatic cancer resection in terms of short-term, long-term, and oncologic outcomes using the win ratio, a novel statistical approach.

METHODS

Patients undergoing PD for pancreatic adenocarcinoma 2010-2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients were paired based on age, sex, race, tumor size, Charlson-Deyo score, and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The win ratio was calculated based on 30-day and 3-year mortality, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, surgical margin status, examination of at least 11 lymph nodes, extended length of stay, and 30-day readmission.

RESULTS

Among 18,936 patients, median age was 67 (IQR: 60-74); most patients had stage II disease at diagnosis (n = 16,530, 87.3%) and tumor size ≥ 2 cm (n = 15,880, 83.9%). The majority of patients underwent open PD (n = 16,409, 86.7%) versus MIS PD (n = 2527, 13.3%). For every matched patient-patient pair, the odds of the patient undergoing MIS PD "winning" were 1.14 (95%CI 1.13-1.15) higher versus open PD. The benefits of MIS PD were most pronounced among patients with tumor size < 2 cm (WR 1.21, 95%CI 1.13-1.30 versus ≥ 2 cm, WR 1.13, 95%CI 1.12-1.14) and patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to resection (WR 1.28, 95%CI 1.23-1.32 versus no neoadjuvant chemotherapy, WR 1.13, 95%CI 1.11-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

MIS PD may be preferable to open PD based on a hierarchical composite outcome that considered short-term, long-term, and oncologic outcomes.

Incidence and Risk Factors for New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus After Surgical Resection of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: A MarketScan Study

OBJECTIVES

There is a paucity of literature evaluating new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) after resection of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). We sought to characterize the incidence and risk factors associated with NODM after partial pancreatectomy for PCLs.

METHODS

We utilized the IBM MarketScan Database (2012-2018) to identify all nondiabetic adults who underwent partial pancreatectomy for PCLs. Patients with any other pancreatic disease were excluded. We performed Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to define the incidence and risk factors of postoperative NODM.

RESULTS

Among 311 patients, the overall risk (95% confidence interval) of NODM was 9.1% (6.3-12.9%), 15.1% (11.3-20.2%), and 20.2% (15.3-26.4%) at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis (adjusted hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval) revealed that older age (1.97; 1.04-3.72; 55-64 vs 18-54 years), obesity (2.63; 1.35-5.12), hypertension (1.79; 1.01-3.17), and cardiovascular disease (2.54; 1.02-6.28) were independent predictors of NODM. Rates of NODM were similar after distal pancreatectomy versus pancreaticoduodenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Within 2 years, 1 in 5 patients without any other pancreatic disease will develop NODM after partial pancreatectomy for PCLs. Those with advanced age, metabolic syndrome features, and/or cardiovascular disease may benefit from preoperative counseling and intensive postoperative monitoring, education, and treatment for diabetes mellitus.