Muscarinic receptors in adrenal chromaffin cells: physiological role and regulation of ion channels

Lead exerts a depression of neurotransmitter release through a blockade of voltage dependent calcium channels in chromaffin cells

The present work, using chromaffin cells of bovine adrenal medullae (BCCs), aims to describe what type of ionic current alterations induced by lead (Pb2+) underlies its effects reported on synaptic transmission. We observed that the acute application of Pb2+ lead to a drastic depression of neurotransmitters release in a concentration-dependent manner when the cells were stimulated with both K+ or acetylcholine, with an IC50 of 119,57 μM and of 5,19 μM, respectively. This effect was fully recovered after washout. Pb2+ also blocked calcium channels of BCCs in a time- and concentration-dependent manner with an IC50 of 6,87 μM. This blockade was partially reversed upon washout. This compound inhibited the calcium current at all test potentials and shows a shift of the I-V curve to more negative values of about 8 mV. The sodium current was not blocked by acute application of high Pb2+ concentrations. Voltage-dependent potassium current was also shortly affected by high Pb2+. Nevertheless, the calcium- and voltage-dependent potassium current was drastically depressed in a dose-dependent manner, with an IC50 of 24,49 μM. This blockade was related to the prevention of Ca2+ influx through voltage-dependent calcium channels coupled to Ca2+-activated K+-channels (BK) instead a direct linking to these channels. Under current-clamp conditions, BCCs exhibit a resting potential of -52.7 mV, firing spontaneous APs (1-2 spikes/s) generated by the opening of Na+ and Ca2+-channels, and terminated by the activation of K+ channels. In spite of the effect on ionic channels exerted by Pb2+, we found that Pb2+ didn't alter cellular excitability, no modification of the membrane potential, and no effect on action potential firing. Taken together, these results point to a neurotoxic action evoked by Pb2+ that is associated with changes in neurotransmitter release by blocking the ionic currents responsible for the calcium influx.

Enhancement of muscarinic receptor-mediated excitation in spontaneously hypertensive rat adrenal medullary chromaffin cells

One of the mechanisms for hypertension is an increase in blood catecholamines due to increased secretion from sympathetic nerve terminals and adrenal medullary chromaffin (AMC) cells. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) are used as an animal model of hypertension. Catecholamine secretion in AMC cells occurs in response to humoral factors and neuronal inputs from the sympathetic nerve fibres. Acetylcholine (ACh) released from the nerve terminals activates nicotinic as well as muscarinic ACh receptors. The present experiment aimed to elucidate whether muscarinic receptor-mediated excitation is altered in SHR AMC cells and, if it is, how. Compared with normotensive rat AMC cells, muscarinic stimulation induced greater catecholamine secretion and larger depolarising inward currents in SHR AMC cells. In contrast to normotensive rat AMC cells, the muscarine-induced current consisted of quinine-sensitive and quinine-insensitive components. The former and the latter are possibly ascribed to nonselective cation channel activation and TWIK-related acid-sensitive K+ (TASK) channel inhibition, as noted in guinea pig AMC cells. In fact, immunoreactive material for TASK1 and several isoforms of transient receptor potential canonical (TRPC) channels was detected in SHR AMC cells. Stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), which plays an essential role for heteromeric TRPC1-TRPC4 channel formation and is not expressed in normotensive rat AMC cells, was detected in the cytoplasm and co-localised with TRPC1. The expression of muscarinic M1 receptors was enhanced in SHR AMC cells compared with normotensive rats. The results indicate that muscarinic excitation is enhanced in SHR AMC cells, probably through facilitation of TRPC channel signalling.

Adaptive remodeling of the stimulus-secretion coupling: Lessons from the 'stressed' adrenal medulla

Stress is part of our daily lives and good health in the modern world is offset by unhealthy lifestyle factors, including the deleterious consequences of stress and associated pathologies. Repeated and/or prolonged stress may disrupt the body homeostasis and thus threatens our lives. Adaptive processes that allow the organism to adapt to new environmental conditions and maintain its homeostasis are therefore crucial. The adrenal glands are major endocrine/neuroendocrine organs involved in the adaptive response of the body facing stressful situations. Upon stress episodes and in response to activation of the sympathetic nervous system, the first adrenal cells to be activated are the neuroendocrine chromaffin cells located in the medullary tissue of the adrenal gland. By releasing catecholamines (mainly epinephrine and to a lesser extent norepinephrine), adrenal chromaffin cells actively contribute to the development of adaptive mechanisms, in particular targeting the cardiovascular system and leading to appropriate adjustments of blood pressure and heart rate, as well as energy metabolism. Specifically, this chapter covers the current knowledge as to how the adrenal medullary tissue remodels in response to stress episodes, with special attention paid to chromaffin cell stimulus-secretion coupling. Adrenal stimulus-secretion coupling encompasses various elements taking place at both the molecular/cellular and tissular levels. Here, I focus on stress-driven changes in catecholamine biosynthesis, chromaffin cell excitability, synaptic neurotransmission and gap junctional communication. These signaling pathways undergo a collective and finely-tuned remodeling, contributing to appropriate catecholamine secretion and maintenance of body homeostasis in response to stress.

Is the Cerebellum Involved in the Nervous Control of the Immune System Function?

BACKGROUND

According to the views of psychoneuroendocrinoimmunology, many interactions exist between nervous, endocrine and immune system the purpose of which is to achieve adaptive measures restoring an internal equilibrium (homeostasis) following stress conditions. The center where these interactions converge is the hypothalamus. This is a center of the autonomic nervous system that controls the visceral systems, including the immune system, through both the nervous and neuroendocrine mechanisms. The nervous mechanisms are based on nervous circuits that bidirectionally connect hypothalamic neurons and neurons of the sympathetic and parasympathetic system; the neuroendocrine mechanisms are based on the release by neurosecretory hypothalamic neurons of hormones that target the endocrine cells and on the feedback effects of the hormones secreted by these endocrine cells on the same hypothalamic neurons. Moreover, the hypothalamus is an important subcortical center of the limbic system that controls through nervous and neuroendocrine mechanisms the areas of the cerebral cortex where the psychic functions controlling mood, emotions, anxiety and instinctive behaviors take place. Accordingly, various studies conducted in the last decades have indicated that hypothalamic diseases may be associated with immune and/or psychic disorders.

OBJECTIVE

Various researches have reported that the hypothalamus is controlled by the cerebellum through a feedback nervous circuit, namely the hypothalamocerebellar circuit, which bi-directionally connects regions of the hypothalamus, including the immunoregulatory ones, and related regions of the cerebellum. An objective of the present review was to analyze the anatomical bases of the nervous and neuroendocrine mechanisms for the control of the immune system and, in particular, of the interaction between hypothalamus and cerebellum to achieve the immunoregulatory function.

CONCLUSION

Since the hypothalamus represents the link through which the immune functions may influence the psychic functions and vice versa, the cerebellum, controlling several regions of the hypothalamus, could be considered as a primary player in the regulation of the multiple functional interactions postulated by psychoneuroendocrinoimmunology.

STIM1-dependent membrane insertion of heteromeric TRPC1-TRPC4 channels in response to muscarinic receptor stimulation

Muscarinic receptor stimulation results in activation of nonselective cation (NSC) channels in guinea pig adrenal medullary (AM) cells. The biophysical and pharmacological properties of the NSC channel suggest the involvement of heteromeric channels of TRPC1 with TRPC4 or TRPC5. This possibility was explored in PC12 cells and guinea pig AM cells. Proximity ligation assay (PLA) revealed that when exogenously expressed in PC12 cells, TRPC1 forms a heteromeric channel with TRPC4, but not with TRPC5, in a STIM1-dependent manner. The heteromeric TRPC1-TRPC4 channel was also observed in AM cells and trafficked to the cell periphery in response to muscarine stimulation. To explore whether heteromeric channels are inserted into the cell membrane, tags were attached to the extracellular domains of TRPC1 and TRPC4. PLA products developed between the tags in cells stimulated by muscarine, but not in resting cells, indicating that muscarinic stimulation results in the membrane insertion of channels. This membrane insertion required expression of full-length STIM1. We conclude that muscarinic receptor stimulation results in the insertion of heteromeric TRPC1-TRPC4 channels into the cell membrane in PC12 cells and guinea pig AM cells.

Differences among muscarinic agonists in M1 receptor-mediated nonselective cation channel activation and TASK1 channel inhibition in adrenal medullary cells

Muscarinic receptor stimulation induces depolarizing inward currents and catecholamine secretion in adrenal medullary (AM) cells from various mammals. In guinea-pig AM cells muscarine and oxotremorine at concentrations ≤ 1 μM produce activation of nonselective cation channels with a similar potency and efficacy, whereas muscarine at higher concentrations produces not only nonselective cation channel activation, but also TASK1 channel inhibition. In rat AM cells, the muscarinic M₁ receptor is involved in TASK1 channel inhibition in response to muscarinic agonists, and the efficacy of oxotremorine is half that of muscarine. These pharmacological findings might indicate that different muscarinic receptor subtypes are responsible for the regulation of nonselective cation and TASK1 channel activities. The present study aimed to determine the muscarinic receptor subtypes involved in nonselective cation channel activation in guinea-pig and mouse AM cells. The inward current evoked by 1 μM muscarine was completely suppressed by 100 μM quinine, whereas 30 μM muscarine-induced inward currents were comprised of quinine-sensitive and -insensitive components. The electrophysiological and pharmacological properties of the muscarine-induced currents indicated that the quinine-sensitive and insensitive components are due to nonselective cation channel activation and TASK1 channel inhibition, respectively. Muscarine at 30 μM failed to induce any current in AM cells treated with muscarinic toxin 7 or genetically deleted of the M₁ receptor. The K_D value of VU0255035 against the muscarinic receptor mediating nonselective cation channel activation was 17.5 nM. These results indicate that the M₁ receptor mediates nonselective cation channel activation as well as TASK1 channel inhibition.

Inflammatory Signaling in Hypertension: Regulation of Adrenal Catecholamine Biosynthesis

The immune system is increasingly recognized for its role in the genesis and progression of hypertension. The adrenal gland is a major site that coordinates the stress response via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic-adrenal system. Catecholamines released from the adrenal medulla function in the neuro-hormonal regulation of blood pressure and have a well-established link to hypertension. The immune system has an active role in the progression of hypertension and cytokines are powerful modulators of adrenal cell function. Adrenal medullary cells integrate neural, hormonal, and immune signals. Changes in adrenal cytokines during the progression of hypertension may promote blood pressure elevation by influencing catecholamine biosynthesis. This review highlights the potential interactions of cytokine signaling networks with those of catecholamine biosynthesis within the adrenal, and discusses the role of cytokines in the coordination of blood pressure regulation and the stress response.

Molecular mechanism for muscarinic M1 receptor-mediated endocytosis of TWIK-related acid-sensitive K+ 1 channels in rat adrenal medullary cells

KEY POINTS

The muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR)-mediated increase in excitability in rat adrenal medullary cells is at least in part due to inhibition of TWIK (tandem of P domains in a weak inwardly rectifying K⁺ channel)-related acid-sensitive K⁺ (TASK)1 channels. In this study we focused on the molecular mechanism of mAChR-mediated inhibition of TASK1 channels. Exposure to muscarine resulted in a clathrin-dependent endocytosis of TASK1 channels following activation of the muscarinic M₁ receptor (M₁ R). This muscarinic signal for the endocytosis was mediated in sequence by phospholipase C (PLC), protein kinase C (PKC), and then the non-receptor tyrosine kinase Src with the consequent tyrosine phosphorylation of TASK1. The present results establish that TASK1 channels are tyrosine phosphorylated and internalized in a clathrin-dependent manner in response to M₁ R stimulation and this translocation is at least in part responsible for muscarinic inhibition of TASK1 channels in rat AM cells.

ABSTRACT

Activation of muscarinic receptor (mAChR) in rat adrenal medullary (AM) cells induces depolarization through the inhibition of TWIK-related acid-sensitive K⁺ (TASK)1 channels. Here, pharmacological and immunological approaches were used to elucidate the molecular mechanism for this mAChR-mediated inhibition. TASK1-like immunoreactive (IR) material was mainly located at the cell periphery in dissociated rat AM cells, and its majority was internalized in response to muscarine. The muscarine-induced inward current and translocation of TASK1 were suppressed by dynasore, a dynamin inhibitor. The muscarinic translocation was suppressed by MT7, a specific M₁ antagonist, and the dose-response curves for muscarinic agonist-induced translocation were similar to those for the muscarinic inhibition of TASK1 currents. The muscarine-induced inward current and/or translocation of TASK1 were suppressed by inhibitors for phospholipase C (PLC), protein kinase C (PKC), and/or Src. TASK1 channels in AM cells and PC12 cells were transiently associated with Src and were tyrosine phosphorylated in response to muscarinic stimulation. After internalization, TASK1 channels were quickly dephosphorylated even while they remained in the cytoplasm. The cytoplasmic TASK1-like IR material quickly recycled back to the cell periphery after muscarine stimulation for 0.5 min, but not 10 min. We conclude that M₁ R stimulation results in internalization of TASK1 channels through the PLC-PKC-Src pathway with the consequent phosphorylation of tyrosine and that this M₁ R-mediated internalization is at least in part responsible for muscarinic inhibition of TASK1 channels in rat AM cells.