Differential expression of caudal and dorsal genes in the teloblast lineages of the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex

Comparison of genes involved in brain development: insights into the organization and evolution of the telencephalic pallium

The mechanisms underlying the organization and evolution of the telencephalic pallium are not yet clear.. To address this issue, we first performed comparative analysis of genes critical for the development of the pallium (Emx1/2 and Pax6) and subpallium (Dlx2 and Nkx1/2) among 500 vertebrate species. We found that these genes have no obvious variations in chromosomal duplication/loss, gene locus synteny or Darwinian selection. However, there is an additional fragment of approximately 20 amino acids in mammalian Emx1 and a poly-(Ala)6-7 in Emx2. Lentiviruses expressing mouse or chick Emx2 (m-Emx2 or c-Emx2 Lv) were injected into the ventricle of the chick telencephalon at embryonic Day 3 (E3), and the embryos were allowed to develop to E12-14 or to posthatchling. After transfection with m-Emx2 Lv, the cells expressing Reelin, Vimentin or GABA increased, and neurogenesis of calbindin cells changed towards the mammalian inside-out pattern in the dorsal pallium and mesopallium. In addition, a behavior test for posthatched chicks indicated that the passive avoidance ratio increased significantly. The study suggests that the acquisition of an additional fragment in mammalian Emx2 is associated with the organization and evolution of the mammalian pallium.

Spatial Colinear but Broken Temporal Expression of Duplicated ParaHox Genes in Asexually Reproducing Annelids, Nais communis and Pristina longiseta

ParaHox genes are key developmental regulators involved in the patterning of the digestive tract along the anteroposterior axis and the development of the nervous system. Most studies have focused on the function of these genes in embryogenesis, while their expression patterns in postembryonic development often remain unknown. In this study, we identified for the first time all ParaHox orthologs in two naidid oligochaetes, N. communis and P. longiseta, and described their expression patterns during normal growth and fission in these animals. We showed that Gsx and Cdx are presented by two paralogs, while Xlox is a single copy gene in both species. Using whole-mount in situ hybridization, we also found that orthologs, except for the Xlox gene, have similar activity patterns with minor differences in details, while the expression patterns of paralogs can differ significantly. However, all these genes are involved in axial patterning and/or in tissue remodeling during growth and asexual reproduction in naidids. Moreover, during paratomic fission, these genes are expressed with spatial colinearity but temporal colinearity is broken. The results of this study may be evidence of the functional diversification of duplicated genes and suggest involvement of the ParaHox genes in whole-body patterning during growth and asexual reproduction in annelids.

The Caudal ParaHox gene is required for hindgut development in the mollusc Tritia (a.k.a. Ilyanassa)

Caudal homeobox genes are found across animals, typically linked to two other homeobox genes in what has been called the ParaHox cluster. These genes have been proposed to pattern the anterior-posterior axis of the endoderm ancestrally, but the expression of Caudal in extant groups is varied and often occurs in other germ layers. Here we examine the role of Caudal in the embryo of the mollusc Tritia (Ilyanassa) obsoleta. ToCaudal expression is initially broad, then becomes progressively restricted and is finally only in the developing hindgut (a.k.a. intestine). Knockdown of ToCaudal using morpholino oligonucleotides specifically blocks hindgut development, indicating that despite its initially broad expression, the functional role of ToCaudal is in hindgut patterning. This is the first functional characterization of Caudal in an animal with spiralian development, which is an ancient mode of embryogenesis that arose early in bilaterian animal evolution. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the ancestral role of the ParaHox genes was anterior-posterior patterning of the endoderm.

Transcriptional control of unequal cleavage in early Tubifex embryos

Early embryos of the clitellate annelid Tubifex (oligochaete) undergo a series of unequal spiral cell divisions before the descendants of the D quadrant micromeres (cells 2d and 4d) divide bilaterally. Here, we show that inhibition of zygotic transcription by microinjection of α-amanitin (transcription inhibitor) exclusively converts unequal cleavage in cell 2d¹¹ (granddaughter of 2d) into equal cleavage while other unequal cleavages and ensuing bilateral cleavages in cells 4d and 2d¹¹¹ (great-granddaughter of 2d) all proceed in a normal fashion in the presence of this inhibitor. These results differ significantly from those reported for embryos of another clitellate annelid Helobdella (leech), in which inhibition of transcription converts bilateral (symmetric) cleavages in cells DNOPQ"' and DM" (equivalent to 2d¹¹¹ and 4d) into unequal (asymmetric) cleavages while having no apparent effect on unequal cleavage in DNOPQ" (equivalent to 2d¹¹). These differences imply distinct mechanisms for the control of the unequal-to-bilateral transition in the two clitellate annelids.

Embryonic expression patterns of Hox genes in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex

We have cloned and characterized the expression of seven Hox genes (designated Ttu-lab, Ttu-Dfd, Ttu-Scr1, Ttu-Scr2, Ttu-Lox5, Ttu-Lox4 and Ttu-Lox2) from the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. RT-PCR analyses show that except for Ttu-Lox4 and Ttu-Lox2 which begin expression as early as cleavage stages, Tubifex Hox genes are expressed during stages 13-18 when embryos undergo germ band formation, segmentation and body elongation. In terms of combination of tissues (or organs) exhibiting positive cells, the Tubifex Hox genes examined in this study are classified into three groups. Ttu-lab, Ttu-Scr1 and Ttu-Lox5 are expressed only in the ventral nerve cord; Ttu-Scr2 and Ttu-Lox4 are expressed not only in the ventral nerve cord but also in distinct lateral segmental tissues; and Ttu-Dfd and Ttu-Lox2 are expressed not only in the segmental ectoderm along the length of the AP body axis but also in the prostomium. Anterior expression boundaries of Ttu-lab, Ttu-Scr1, Ttu-Lox5 and Ttu-Lox4 are at segments 3, 4, 5, and 9, respectively. Anterior expression boundary of Ttu-Scr2 is at segment 2, and Ttu-Dfd and Ttu-Lox2 are expressed even at the anteriormost portion, the prostomium. These observations suggest that as in other annelids, so-called "spatial colinearity" of anterior expression boundaries of Hox genes has been conserved in the oligochaetes. It is also evident that there are some oligochaete Hox genes which violate the spatial colinearity rule.

Deployment of regulatory genes during gastrulation and germ layer specification in a model spiralian mollusc Crepidula

BACKGROUND

During gastrulation, endoderm and mesoderm are specified from a bipotential precursor (endomesoderm) that is argued to be homologous across bilaterians. Spiralians also generate mesoderm from ectodermal precursors (ectomesoderm), which arises near the blastopore. While a conserved gene regulatory network controls specification of endomesoderm in deuterostomes and ecdysozoans, little is known about genes controlling specification or behavior of either source of spiralian mesoderm or the digestive tract.

RESULTS

Using the mollusc Crepidula, we examined conserved regulatory factors and compared their expression to fate maps to score expression in the germ layers, blastopore lip, and digestive tract. Many genes were expressed in both ecto- and endomesoderm, but only five were expressed in ectomesoderm exclusively. The latter may contribute to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition seen in ectomesoderm.

CONCLUSIONS

We present the first comparison of genes expressed during spiralian gastrulation in the context of high-resolution fate maps. We found variation of genes expressed in the blastopore lip, mouth, and cells that will form the anus. Shared expression of many genes in both mesodermal sources suggests that components of the conserved endomesoderm program were either co-opted for ectomesoderm formation or that ecto- and endomesoderm are derived from a common mesodermal precursor that became subdivided into distinct domains during evolution.

The ontogeny of nanos homologue expression in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex

We have cloned and characterized the expression of a nanos homologue (designated Ttu-nos) from the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. Ttu-nos mRNA is distributed broadly throughout the early cleavage stages. Ttu-nos is expressed in most if not all of the early blastomeres, in which Ttu-nos RNA associates with pole plasms. Ttu-nos transcripts are concentrated to 2d and 4d cells. Shortly after 2d(111) (derived from 2d cell) divides into a bilateral pair of NOPQ proteloblasts, Ttu-nos RNA vanishes from the embryo, which is soon followed by the resumption of Ttu-nos expression in nascent primary blast cells produced by teloblasts. The resumption of Ttu-nos expression occurs only in a subset of teloblast lineages (viz., M, N and Q). After Ttu-nos expression is retained in the germ band for a while, it disappears in anterior-to-posterior progression. At the end of embryogenesis, there is no trace of Ttu-nos expression. Thereafter, growing juveniles do not show any sign of Ttu-nos expression, either. The first sign of Ttu-nos expression is detected in oocytes in the ovary of young adults (ca 40 days after hatching), and its expression continues in growing oocytes that undergo yolk deposition and maturation in the ovisac.

Primordial germ cells in an oligochaete annelid are specified according to the birth rank order in the mesodermal teloblast lineage

The primordial germ cells (PGCs) in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex are descentants of the mesodermal (M) teloblast and are located in the two midbody segments X and XI in which they serve as germline precursors forming the testicular gonad and the ovarian gonad, respectively. During embryogenesis, vasa-expressing cells (termed presumptive PGCs or pre-PGCs) emerge in a variable set of midbody segments including the genital segments (X and XI); at the end of embryogenesis, pre-PGCs are confined to the genital segments, where they become PGCs in the juvenile. Here, using live imaging of pre-PGCs, we have demonstrated that during Tubifex embryogenesis, pre-PGCs (defined by Vasa expression) stay in segments where they have emerged, suggesting that it is unlikely that pre-PGCs move intersegmentally during embryogenesis. Thus, it is apparent that pre-PGCs derived from the 10th and 11th M teloblast-derived primary m blast cells (designated m10 and m11) that give rise, respectively, to segments X and XI are specified in situ as PGCs and that those born in other segments become undetectable at the end of embryogenesis. To address the mechanisms for this segment-specific development of PGCs, we have performed a set of cell-transplantation experiments as well as cell-ablation experiments. When m10 and m11 that are normally located in the mid region of the embryo were placed in positions near the anterior end of the host embryo, these cells formed two consecutive segments, which exhibited Vasa-positive PGC-like cells at early juvenile stage. This suggests that in terms of PGC generation, the fates of m10 and m11 remain unchanged even if they are placed in ectopic positions along the anteroposterior axis. Nor was the fate of m10 and m11 changed even if mesodermal blast cell chains preceding or succeeding m10 and m11 were absent. In a previous study, it was shown that PGC development in segments X and XI occurs normally in the absence of the overlying ectoderm. All this strongly suggests that irrespective of their surrounding cellular environments, m10 and m11 autonomously generate PGCs. We propose that m10 and m11 are exclusively specified as precursors of PGCs at the time of their birth from the M teloblast and that the M teloblast possesses a developmental program through which the sequence of mesodermal blast cell identities is determined.

Homeobox gene expression in Brachiopoda: the role of Not and Cdx in bodyplan patterning, neurogenesis, and germ layer specification

The molecular control that underlies brachiopod ontogeny is largely unknown. In order to contribute to this issue we analyzed the expression pattern of two homeobox containing genes, Not and Cdx, during development of the rhynchonelliform (i.e., articulate) brachiopod Terebratalia transversa. Not is a homeobox containing gene that regulates the formation of the notochord in chordates, while Cdx (caudal) is a ParaHox gene involved in the formation of posterior tissues of various animal phyla. The T. transversa homolog, TtrNot, is expressed in the ectoderm from the beginning of gastrulation until completion of larval development, which is marked by a three-lobed body with larval setae. Expression starts at gastrulation in two areas lateral to the blastopore and subsequently extends over the animal pole of the gastrula. With elongation of the gastrula, expression at the animal pole narrows to a small band, whereas the areas lateral to the blastopore shift slightly towards the future anterior region of the larva. Upon formation of the three larval body lobes, TtrNot expressing cells are present only in the posterior part of the apical lobe. Expression ceases entirely at the onset of larval setae formation. TtrNot expression is absent in unfertilized eggs, in embryos prior to gastrulation, and in settled individuals during and after metamorphosis. Comparison with the expression patterns of Not genes in other metazoan phyla suggests an ancestral role for this gene in gastrulation and germ layer (ectoderm) specification with co-opted functions in notochord formation in chordates and left/right determination in ambulacrarians and vertebrates. The caudal ortholog, TtrCdx, is first expressed in the ectoderm of the gastrulating embryo in the posterior region of the blastopore. Its expression stays stable in that domain until the blastopore is closed. Thereafter, the expression is confined to the ventral portion of the mantle lobe in the fully developed larva. No TtrCdx expression is detectable in the juvenile after metamorphosis. This expression of TtrCdx is congruent with findings in other metazoans, where genes belonging to the Cdx/caudal family are predominantly localized in posterior domains during gastrulation. Later in development this gene will play a fundamental role in the formation of posterior tissues.

Conservation of ParaHox genes' function in patterning of the digestive tract of the marine gastropod Gibbula varia

BACKGROUND

Presence of all three ParaHox genes has been described in deuterostomes and lophotrochozoans, but to date one of these three genes, Xlox has not been reported from any ecdysozoan taxa and both Xlox and Gsx are absent in nematodes. There is evidence that the ParaHox genes were ancestrally a single chromosomal cluster. Colinear expression of the ParaHox genes in anterior, middle, and posterior tissues of several species studied so far suggest that these genes may be responsible for axial patterning of the digestive tract. So far, there are no data on expression of these genes in molluscs.

RESULTS

We isolated the complete coding sequences of the three Gibbula varia ParaHox genes, and then tested their expression in larval and postlarval development. In Gibbula varia, the ParaHox genes participate in patterning of the digestive tract and are expressed in some cells of the neuroectoderm. The expression of these genes coincides with the gradual formation of the gut in the larva. Gva-Gsx patterns potential neural precursors of cerebral ganglia as well as of the apical sensory organ. During larval development this gene is involved in the formation of the mouth and during postlarval development it is expressed in the precursor cells involved in secretion of the radula, the odontoblasts. Gva-Xolx and Gva-Cdx are involved in gut patterning in the middle and posterior parts of digestive tract, respectively. Both genes are expressed in some ventral neuroectodermal cells; however the expression of Gva-Cdx fades in later larval stages while the expression of Gva-Xolx in these cells persists.

CONCLUSIONS

In Gibbula varia the ParaHox genes are expressed during anterior-posterior patterning of the digestive system. This colinearity is not easy to spot during early larval stages because the differentiated endothelial cells within the yolk permanently migrate to their destinations in the gut. After torsion, Gsx patterns the mouth and foregut, Xlox the midgut gland or digestive gland, and Cdx the hindgut. ParaHox genes of Gibbula are also expressed during specification of cerebral and ventral neuroectodermal cells. Our results provide additional support for the ancestral complexity of Gsx expression and its ancestral role in mouth patterning in protostomes, which was secondarily lost or simplified in some species.

Identification and functional study of a shrimp Relish homologue

Rel/NF-kappaB transcription factors play central roles in induction and regulation of innate immune responses. Here we describe the identification and functional analysis of a Relish homologue, LvRelish and its shorter isoform sLvRelish, from the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. The LvRelish gene has 22 exons in approximately 15 kb genomic sequence. The full-length cDNA of LvRelish is 4071 bp with an open reading frame that encodes 1207 amino acids. LvRelish contains a conserved Rel homology domain (RHD), a nucleus localization signal, an IkappaB-like domain (six ankyrin repeats), and a death domain, suggesting that it belongs to the class I NF-kappaB. sLvRelish cDNA is 1051 bp encoding 317 amino acids. It shares the RHD region with LvRelish. RT-PCR analysis showed that LvRelish and sLvRelish mRNAs were expressed at different levels in tissues. Western blot analysis showed that recombinant intact LvRelish could be cleaved into two fragments in S2 cells, and immunofluorescence assay showed that the plasmid-expressed LvRelish protein was seen both in the cytoplasm and the nucleus. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay showed that recombinant RHD of LvRelish in S2 cells bound specifically with Drosophila melanogaster kappaB motifs in vitro. Both the LvRelish and its RHD domain transactivated the reporter gene controlled by the 5' flanking region of penaeidin 4, an antibacterial peptide of shrimp, suggesting that LvRelish can regulate the transcription of penaeidin 4 gene. Identification of LvRelish will help us better understand shrimp immunity and may help obtain more effective methods to prevent shrimp diseases.

Features of the ancestral bilaterian inferred from Platynereis dumerilii ParaHox genes

Background

The ParaHox gene cluster is the evolutionary sister to the Hox cluster. Whilst the role of the Hox cluster in patterning the anterior-posterior axis of bilaterian animals is well established, and the organisation of vertebrate Hox clusters is intimately linked to gene regulation, much less is known about the more recently discovered ParaHox cluster. ParaHox gene clustering, and its relationship to expression, has only been described in deuterostomes. Conventional protostome models (Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans) are secondarily derived with respect to ParaHox genes, suffering gene loss and cluster break-up.

Results

We provide the first evidence for ParaHox gene clustering from a less-derived protostome animal, the annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Clustering of these genes is thus not a sole preserve of the deuterostome lineage within Bilateria. This protostome ParaHox cluster is not entirely intact however, with Pdu-Cdx being on the opposite end of the same chromosome arm from Pdu-Gsx and Pdu-Xlox. From the genomic sequence around the P. dumerilii ParaHox genes the neighbouring genes are identified, compared with other taxa, and the ancestral arrangement deduced.

Conclusion

We relate the organisation of the ParaHox genes to their expression, and from comparisons with other taxa hypothesise that a relatively complex pattern of ParaHox gene expression existed in the protostome-deuterostome ancestor, which was secondarily simplified along several invertebrate lineages. Detailed comparisons of the gene content around the ParaHox genes enables the reconstruction of the genome surrounding the ParaHox cluster of the protostome-deuterostome ancestor, which existed over 550 million years ago.

Toll-like receptors--taking an evolutionary approach

The Toll receptor was initially identified in Drosophila melanogaster for its role in embryonic development. Subsequently, D. melanogaster Toll and mammalian Toll-like receptors (TLRs) have been recognized as key regulators of immune responses. After ten years of intense research on TLRs and the recent accumulation of genomic and functional data in diverse organisms, we review the distribution and functions of TLRs in the animal kingdom. We provide an evolutionary perspective on TLRs, which sheds light on their origin at the dawn of animal evolution and suggests that different TLRs might have been co-opted independently during animal evolution to mediate analogous immune functions.

Embryonic expression of p68, a DEAD-box RNA helicase, in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex

We have cloned and characterized the expression of a p68 homologue (designated Ttu-p68) from the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. Ttu-p68 mRNA is distributed broadly throughout the early stages. Ttu-p68 is expressed in all of the early blastomeres, in which Ttu-p68 RNA associates with pole plasms. Ttu-p68 transcripts are concentrated to 4d cell but not to 2d cell. During gastrulation, expression of Ttu-p68 is restricted to elongating germ bands (GBs) and an anteriormost crescent of micromere descendants on both sides of the embryo. During body elongation that follows gastrulation, expression of Ttu-p68 is further restricted to the stomodaeum (derived from the micromere crescent), ventral ganglia, lateral dots (corresponding to dorsal and ventral setal sacs), ventral large cells (that resemble presumptive primordial germ cells) in segments VIII-XII, and a bilateral pair of cell clusters at the caudal end. At the end of embryogenesis, Ttu-p68 expression persists exclusively in the tail and the lining epithelium of the pharynx.

Transient occurrence of vasa-expressing cells in nongenital segments during embryonic development in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex

The primordial germ cells (PGCs) in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex are mesodermal in origin and are located in the two midbody segments X and XI in which the testis and the ovary are formed, respectively. To identify a molecular marker for the Tubifex PGCs, we isolated the Tubifex homologue (Ttu-vas) of the Drosophila vasa gene. Using whole-mount in situ hybridization, we examined the spatial expression patterns of Ttu-vas from one-cell stage through juvenile stage. Ttu-vas messenger ribonucleic acid (RNA) is present as a maternal transcript distributed broadly throughout the early stages. Ttu-vas is expressed in all of the early cleavage blastomeres, in which Ttu-vas RNA associates with mitotic spindles and pole plasms. Expression of Ttu-vas gradually becomes restricted, first to teloblasts, then to their blast cell progeny comprising the germ bands (GBs), and finally to a set of large ventral cells (termed VE cells) in a variable set of midbody segments including the genital segments (X and XI). At the end of embryogenesis, VE cells are confined to genital segments where they are presumably germline precursors in the juvenile. Staining with a cross-reacting anti-Vasa antibody suggested that VE cells express Ttu-vas protein to the same extent irrespective of their positions along the anteroposterior axis. A set of cell ablation experiments suggested that VE cells are derived from the mesodermal teloblast lineage and that the emergence of VE cells takes place independently of the presence of the ectodermal GBs that normally overlay the mesoderm. These results suggest that T. tubifex generates supernumerary presumptive PGCs during embryogenesis whose number is variable among embryos.

The existence of all three ParaHox genes in the clitellate annelid, Perionyx excavatus

A ParaHox gene cluster is composed of three genes (Gsx, Xlox, and Cdx). It has been proposed that all three ParaHox genes were present in the last common ancestor to the lophotrochozoan protostomes and the deuterostomes and that gene loss event has occurred in the ecdysozoan lineage. In this paper, we report the existence of all three ParaHox genes in Perionyx excavatus, a clitellate annelid. Although orthologs of each of the three ParaHox genes were previously discovered from other lopotrochozoan taxa, this study constitutes the first reported isolation of all three ParaHox genes in the same clitellate species.

Embryonic expression of a decapentaplegic gene in the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex

We have cloned and characterized the expression of a decapentaplegic homologue (designated Ttu-dpp) from the oligochaete annelid Tubifex tubifex. RT-PCR analysis and in situ hybridization revealed that Ttu-dpp begins to be expressed around the time of the onset of ectodermal germ band (GB) elongation (i.e., the onset of gastrulation). At this time, Ttu-dpp expression is detected in the anteriormost part of the GBs. As development proceeds and the GBs elongate, the domain of Ttu-dpp-expressing cells extends posteriorly. Then Ttu-dpp-expressing cells within the GB are divided into two groups: one group occurs along the ventral midline and coincides with the domain of ventral ganglia; the other is located more dorsally. The latter group of Ttu-dpp-expressing cells subsequently undergoes dorsalward expansion, which results in the formation of a lateral stripe of cells in every segment except the first (i.e., segment I). In embryos that undergo body elongation (that is one of the last morphogenetic movements occurring prior to hatchout), Ttu-dpp expression in the lateral region is confined to setal sacs, which are arranged in the same transverse plane around the periphery of each segment (except segment I).

ParaHox gene expression in the polychaete annelid Capitella sp. I

Hox and ParaHox genes are transcriptional regulators vital for many aspects of embryonic development in bilaterian animals and are considered to have originated from one ancestral proto-Hox/ParaHox cluster. Hox genes are clustered in the genome of both protostomes and deuterostomes, and there is a specific relationship between the position of a gene in the cluster and the position of its expression along the animal body axis (colinearity). It is not clear whether the ParaHox genes Gsx, Xlox, and, Cdx generally exhibit a similar phenomenon since developmental expression for all three ParaHox genes within a single species has not yet been described for any protostome animal. Here we show the spatial and temporal localization for all three ParaHox genes in the polychaete Capitella sp. I, a member of one of the morphologically most diverse and understudied groups within the Metazoa, the Lophotrochozoa. Our data demonstrate that although both CapI-Xlox and CapI-Cdx are regionally expressed in the gut, the three Capitella sp. I ParaHox genes as a group do not perfectly fit predictions of temporal or spatial colinearity. Instead, there is a conservation of expression across species associated with development of particular tissues, and the relative order of initiation of ParaHox gene expression likely reflects the relative order of species-specific tissue development during ontogenesis.

caudal and even-skipped in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii and the ancestry of posterior growth

In order to address the question of the conservation of posterior growth mechanisms in bilaterians, we have studied the expression patterns of the orthologues of the genes caudal, even-skipped, and brachyury in the annelid Platynereis dumerilii. Annelids belong to the still poorly studied third large branch of the bilaterians, the lophotrochozoans, and have anatomic and developmental characteristics, such as a segmented body plan, indirect development through a microscopic ciliated larva, and building of the trunk through posterior addition, which are all hypothesized by some authors (including us) to be present already in Urbilateria, the last common ancestor of bilaterians. All three genes are shown to be likely involved in the building of the anteroposterior axis around the slit-like amphistomous blastopore as well as in the patterning of the terminal anus-bearing piece of the body (the pygidium). In addition, caudal and even-skipped are likely involved in the posterior addition of segments. Together with the emerging results on the conservation of segmentation genes, these results reinforce the hypothesis that Urbilateria had a segmented trunk developing through posterior addition.