1
|
Berney DM, Finnegan K, Chu K, Fine SW, Varma M, Cuzick J, Beltran L. Measuring cancer burden in prostatic needle core biopsies: simplified assessments outperform complex measurements in assessing outcome: evidence to assist pathologist efficiency and minimize datasets. Histopathology 2023; 82:1021-1028. [PMID: 36779238 PMCID: PMC10192044 DOI: 10.1111/his.14886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The optimal method of measuring cancer extent in prostate cancer (PCa) biopsies is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS Nine hundred eighty-one men with clinically localised PCa managed conservatively were reviewed with follow up. The number of positive cores (NPC), the Maximum Cancer Length in a core (MCL), Total Cancer Length (TCL), and percentage of positive cores (%+cores) was calculated and univariate and multivariate analysis performed using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), T-stage, and Gleason score. The presence of stromal gaps (SG) was recorded. Univariate models were run where SG made a difference to the MCL. All variables showed significant association with PCa death in univariate models. In multivariate models, incorporating PSA, T-stage, and Gleason score, only %+cores was a significant predictor of outcome, with a 10% increase in %+cores resulting in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.07 (likelihood-ratio test P > Χ2 = 0.01). There were 120 patients where SG made a difference to the MCL and a total of 20 events in this group. Including SG, on univariate analysis the median MCL was 10 mm and HR was 1.16 (P = 0.007), not including SG, the median MCL was 6 mm and HR was 1.23 (P = 6.3 × 10-4 ). Inclusion or exclusion of SG made no significant difference to TCL as a predictor of outcome. CONCLUSION Cancer extent is a strong predictor of PCa death but only %+cores added to the multivariate model. Expressed as a fraction of NPC/total number of cores, this is the simplest method of assessment, which we favour over more complicated methods in nontargeted biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Berney
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and BiotherapeuticsBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
- Department of Cellular PathologyBarts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London HospitalLondonUK
| | - Kier Finnegan
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and DiagnosisWolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonUK
| | - Kim Chu
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and DiagnosisWolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonUK
| | - Samson W Fine
- Department of PathologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Murali Varma
- Department of Cellular PathologyUniversity Hospital of WalesCardiffWLSUK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and BiotherapeuticsBarts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
- Centre for Prevention, Detection and DiagnosisWolfson Institute of Population HealthQueen Mary University of LondonUK
| | - Luis Beltran
- Department of Cellular PathologyBarts Health NHS Trust, The Royal London HospitalLondonUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zelic R, Giunchi F, Fridfeldt J, Carlsson J, Davidsson S, Lianas L, Mascia C, Zugna D, Molinaro L, Vincent PH, Zanetti G, Andrén O, Richiardi L, Akre O, Fiorentino M, Pettersson A. Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade. Clin Epidemiol 2022; 14:59-70. [PMID: 35082531 PMCID: PMC8784949 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s339140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. Objective To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction. Patients and Methods We conducted a case–control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998–2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC). Results The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS. Conclusion The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Zelic
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Correspondence: Renata Zelic Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, K2 Medicin, Solna, K2 Klinisk epidemiologi K Ekström Smedby, Stockholm, 171 77, SwedenTel +46703136037Fax +46851779304 Email
| | - Francesca Giunchi
- Pathology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jonna Fridfeldt
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jessica Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Sabina Davidsson
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Luca Lianas
- Data-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy
| | - Cecilia Mascia
- Data-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy
| | - Daniela Zugna
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, and CPO-Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Division of Pathology, A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Per Henrik Vincent
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gianluigi Zanetti
- Data-Intensive Computing Division, Center for Advanced Studies, Research and Development in Sardinia (CRS4), Pula, Italy
| | - Ove Andrén
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Lorenzo Richiardi
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, and CPO-Piemonte, Turin, Italy
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Andreas Pettersson
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beltran L, Ahmad AS, Sandu H, Kudahetti S, Soosay G, Møller H, Cuzick J, Berney DM. Histopathologic False-positive Diagnoses of Prostate Cancer in the Age of Immunohistochemistry. Am J Surg Pathol 2019; 43:361-368. [PMID: 30531531 PMCID: PMC6375390 DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000001202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
There are few studies into the rate and causes of histopathologic false-positive diagnosis of prostate cancer. Only 2 of these, including a previous one from our group, incorporate survival data. In addition, in none of the previous studies had immunohistochemistry (IHC) been originally requested on any of the misdiagnosed cases. Diagnostic biopsies (n=1080) and transurethral resection of prostate specimens (n=314) from 1394 men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the United Kingdom but treated conservatively between 1990 and 2003 were reviewed by a panel of 3 genitourinary pathologists. Thirty-five cases were excluded for being potentially incomplete. Of the remaining 1359, 30 (2.2%) were reassigned to a nonmalignant category (26 benign and 4 suspicious for malignancy). IHC had been originally performed on 7 of these. The reasons for the errors were recorded on each case: adenosis (19), partial atrophy (3), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (2), seminal vesicle epithelium (1), and hyperplasia (1). Follow-up of these men revealed only one prostate cancer-related death, possibly due to unsampled tumor. In conclusion, a relatively small number of prostate cancer mimics were responsible for a large proportion of the false-positive prostate cancer diagnoses and the use of IHC did not prevent the overcall of benign entities as cancer in approximately a quarter of these cases. Targeting these mimics at educational events and raising awareness of the pitfalls in the interpretation of IHC in prostate cancer diagnosis, emphasizing that glands within a suspicious focus should be treated as a whole rather than individually, may be beneficial in lowering the rate of false-positive diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Beltran
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Amar S Ahmad
- UK Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Holly Sandu
- UK Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Sakunthala Kudahetti
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Henrik Møller
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- UK Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Daniel M Berney
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Department of Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kajikawa K, Kanao K, Kobayashi I, Nishikawa G, Yoshizawa T, Kato Y, Watanabe M, Zennami K, Nakamura K, Sumitomo M. Optimal method for measuring tumor extent in needle biopsy specimens to identify small-volume prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2015; 23:62-8. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.12961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2015] [Accepted: 09/06/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Keishi Kajikawa
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | - Kent Kanao
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | - Ikuo Kobayashi
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | - Genya Nishikawa
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | | | - Yoshiharu Kato
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | - Masahito Watanabe
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | - Kenji Zennami
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | - Kogenta Nakamura
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| | - Makoto Sumitomo
- Department of Urology; Aichi Medical University; Nagakute Aichi Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berney DM, Algaba F, Camparo P, Compérat E, Griffiths D, Kristiansen G, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Varma M, Egevad L. Variation in reporting of cancer extent and benign histology in prostate biopsies among European pathologists. Virchows Arch 2014; 464:583-7. [PMID: 24590584 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-014-1554-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2013] [Revised: 01/27/2014] [Accepted: 02/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
It is not known how uropathologists currently report histopathological features of prostate biopsies such as core length, tumor extent, perineural invasion, and non-tumor-associated features such as inflammation and hyperplasia in needle biopsies. A web-based survey was distributed among 661 members of the European Network of Uropathology. Complete replies were received from 266 pathologists in 22 European countries. Total core lengths were reported by 64 %. The numbers of cores positive for cancer was given by 79 %. Linear cancer extent was reported by 81 %, most often given in millimeters for each core (53 %) followed by the estimation of percentage of cancer in each core (40 %). A gap of benign tissue between separate cancer foci in a single core would always be subtracted by 48 % and by 63 % if cancer foci were minute and widely separated. Perineural invasion was reported by 97 %. Fat invasion by tumor was interpreted as extraprostatic extension by 81 %. Chronic and active/acute inflammation was always reported by 32 and 56 % but only if pronounced by 54 and 39 %, respectively. While most (79 %) would never diagnose benign prostatic hyperplasia on needle biopsy, 21 % would attempt to make this diagnosis. Reporting practices for prostate biopsies are variable among European pathologists. The great variation in some methodologies used suggests a need for further international consensus, in order for retrospective data to be comparable between different institutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M Berney
- Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cuzick J, Yang ZH, Fisher G, Tikishvili E, Stone S, Lanchbury JS, Camacho N, Merson S, Brewer D, Cooper CS, Clark J, Berney DM, Møller H, Scardino P, Sangale Z. Prognostic value of PTEN loss in men with conservatively managed localised prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2013; 108:2582-9. [PMID: 23695019 PMCID: PMC3694239 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The natural history of prostate cancer is highly variable and difficult to predict. We report on the prognostic value of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) loss in a cohort of 675 men with conservatively managed prostate cancer diagnosed by transurethral resection of the prostate. Methods: The PTEN status was assayed by immunohistochemistry (PTEN IHC) and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (PTEN FISH). The primary end point was death from prostate cancer. Results: The PTEN IHC loss was observed in 18% cases. This was significantly associated with prostate cancer death in univariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR)=3.51; 95% CI 2.60–4.73; P=3.1 × 10−14). It was highly predictive of prostate cancer death in the 50% of patients with a low risk score based on Gleason score, PSA, Ki-67 and extent of disease (HR=7.4; 95% CI 2.2–24.6; P=0.012) ), but had no prognostic value in the higher risk patients. The PTEN FISH loss was only weakly associated with PTEN IHC loss (κ=0.5). Both PTEN FISH loss and amplification were univariately predictive of death from prostate cancer, but this was not maintained in the multivariate analyses. Conclusion: In low-risk patients, PTEN IHC loss adds prognostic value to Gleason score, PSA, Ki-67 and extent of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cuzick
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|