Use of computational fluid dynamics for 3D fiber tract visualization on human high-thickness histological slices: histological mesh tractography

Post mortem mapping of connectional anatomy for the validation of diffusion MRI

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) is a unique tool for the study of brain circuitry, as it allows us to image both the macroscopic trajectories and the microstructural properties of axon bundles in vivo. The Human Connectome Project ushered in an era of impressive advances in dMRI acquisition and analysis. As a result of these efforts, the quality of dMRI data that could be acquired in vivo improved substantially, and large collections of such data became widely available. Despite this progress, the main limitation of dMRI remains: it does not image axons directly, but only provides indirect measurements based on the diffusion of water molecules. Thus, it must be validated by methods that allow direct visualization of axons but that can only be performed in post mortem brain tissue. In this review, we discuss methods for validating the various features of connectional anatomy that are extracted from dMRI, both at the macro-scale (trajectories of axon bundles), and at micro-scale (axonal orientations and other microstructural properties). We present a range of validation tools, including anatomic tracer studies, Klingler's dissection, myelin stains, label-free optical imaging techniques, and others. We provide an overview of the basic principles of each technique, its limitations, and what it has taught us so far about the accuracy of different dMRI acquisition and analysis approaches.

Lead-OR: a multimodal platform for deep brain stimulation surgery

Background:

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implant trajectories are stereotactically defined using preoperative neuroimaging. To validate the correct trajectory, microelectrode recordings (MERs) or local field potential recordings can be used to extend neuroanatomical information (defined by MRI) with neurophysiological activity patterns recorded from micro- and macroelectrodes probing the surgical target site. Currently, these two sources of information (imaging vs. electrophysiology) are analyzed separately, while means to fuse both data streams have not been introduced.

Methods:

Here, we present a tool that integrates resources from stereotactic planning, neuroimaging, MER, and high-resolution atlas data to create a real-time visualization of the implant trajectory. We validate the tool based on a retrospective cohort of DBS patients (N = 52) offline and present single-use cases of the real-time platform.

Results:

We establish an open-source software tool for multimodal data visualization and analysis during DBS surgery. We show a general correspondence between features derived from neuroimaging and electrophysiological recordings and present examples that demonstrate the functionality of the tool.

Conclusions:

This novel software platform for multimodal data visualization and analysis bears translational potential to improve accuracy of DBS surgery. The toolbox is made openly available and is extendable to integrate with additional software packages.

Funding:

Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (410169619, 424778381), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DynaSti), National Institutes of Health (2R01 MH113929), and Foundation for OCD Research (FFOR).

Deep brain stimulation is an established therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease and an emerging option for other neurological conditions. Electrodes are implanted deep in the brain to stimulate precise brain regions and control abnormal brain activity in those areas. The most common target for Parkinson’s disease, for instance, is a structure called the subthalamic nucleus, which sits at the base of the brain, just above the brain stem.

To ensure electrodes are placed correctly, surgeons use various sources of information to characterize the patient’s brain anatomy and decide on an implant site. These data include brain scans taken before surgery and recordings of brain activity taken during surgery to confirm the intended implant site. Sometimes, the brain activity signals from this last confirmation step may slightly alter surgical plans. It represents one of many challenges for clinical teams: to analyse, assimilate, and communicate data as it is collected during the procedure.

Oxenford et al. developed a software pipeline to aggregate the data surgeons use to implant electrodes. The open-source platform, dubbed Lead-OR, visualises imaging data and brain activity recordings (termed electrophysiology data) in real time. The current set-up integrates with commercial tools and existing software for surgical planning.

Oxenford et al. tested Lead-OR on data gathered retrospectively from 32 patients with Parkinson’s who had electrodes implanted in their subthalamic nucleus. The platform showed good agreement between imaging and electrophysiology data, although there were some unavoidable discrepancies, arising from limitations in the imaging pipeline and from the surgical procedure. Lead-OR was also able to correct for brain shift, which is where the brain moves ever so slightly in the skull.

With further validation, this proof-of-concept software could serve as a useful decision-making tool for surgical teams implanting electrodes for deep brain stimulation. In time, if implemented, its use could improve the accuracy of electrode placement, translating into better surgical outcomes for patients. It also has the potential to integrate forthcoming ultra-high-resolution data from current brain mapping projects, and other commercial surgical planning tools.