Is it left or is it right? A classification approach for investigating hemispheric differences in low and high dimensionality

Evidence for a Compensatory Relationship between Left- and Right-Lateralized Brain Networks

The two hemispheres of the human brain are functionally asymmetric. At the network level, the language network exhibits left-hemisphere lateralization. While this asymmetry is widely replicated, the extent to which other functional networks demonstrate lateralization remains a subject of Investigation. Additionally, it is unknown how the lateralization of one functional network may affect the lateralization of other networks within individuals. We quantified lateralization for each of 17 networks by computing the relative surface area on the left and right cerebral hemispheres. After examining the ecological, convergent, and external validity and test-retest reliability of this surface area-based measure of lateralization, we addressed two hypotheses across multiple datasets (Human Connectome Project = 553, Human Connectome Project-Development = 343, Natural Scenes Dataset = 8). First, we hypothesized that networks associated with language, visuospatial attention, and executive control would show the greatest lateralization. Second, we hypothesized that relationships between lateralized networks would follow a dependent relationship such that greater left-lateralization of a network would be associated with greater right-lateralization of a different network within individuals, and that this pattern would be systematic across individuals. A language network was among the three networks identified as being significantly left-lateralized, and attention and executive control networks were among the five networks identified as being significantly right-lateralized. Next, correlation matrices, an exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the second hypothesis and examine the organization of lateralized networks. We found general support for a dependent relationship between highly left- and right-lateralized networks, meaning that across subjects, greater left lateralization of a given network (such as a language network) was linked to greater right lateralization of another network (such as a ventral attention/salience network) and vice versa. These results further our understanding of brain organization at the macro-scale network level in individuals, carrying specific relevance for neurodevelopmental conditions characterized by disruptions in lateralization such as autism and schizophrenia.

A Novel Neurorehabilitation Prognosis Prediction Modeling on Separated Left-Right Hemiplegia Based on Brain-Computer Interfaces Assisted Rehabilitation

It is essential for neuroscience and clinic to estimate the influence of neuro-intervention after brain damage. Most related studies have used Mirrored Contralesional-Ipsilesional hemispheres (MCI) methods flipping the axial neuroimaging on the x-axis in prognosis prediction. But left-right hemispheric asymmetry in the brain has become a consensus. MCI confounds the intrinsic brain asymmetry with the asymmetry caused by unilateral damage, leading to questions about the reliability of the results and difficulties in physiological explanations. We proposed the Separated Left-Right hemiplegia (SLR) method to model left and right hemiplegia separately. Two pipelines have been designed in contradistinction to demonstrate the validity of the SLR method, including MCI and removing intrinsic asymmetry (RIA) pipelines. A patient dataset with 18 left-hemiplegic and 22 right-hemiplegic stroke patients and a healthy dataset with 40 subjects, age- and sex-matched with the patients, were selected in the experiment. Blood-Oxygen Level-Dependent MRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging were used to build brain networks whose nodes were defined by the Automated Anatomical Labeling atlas. We applied the same statistical and machine learning framework for all pipelines, logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine for classifying the patients who are significant or non-significant responders to brain-computer interfaces assisted training and optimal subset regression, support vector regression for predicting post-intervention outcomes. The SLR pipeline showed 5-15% improvement in accuracy and at least 0.1 upgrades in [Formula: see text], revealing common and unique recovery mechanisms after left and right strokes and helping clinicians make rehabilitation plans.