Implementation of an evidence-based guideline on fluid resuscitation: lessons learnt for future guidelines

Stimulating implementation of clinical practice guidelines in hospital care from a central guideline organization perspective: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The uptake of guidelines in care is inconsistent. This review focuses on guideline implementation strategies used by guideline organizations (governmental agencies, scientific/professional societies and other umbrella organizations), experienced implementation barriers and facilitators and impact of their implementation efforts.

METHODS

We searched PUBMED, EMBASE and CINAHL and conducted snowballing. Eligibility criteria included guidelines focused on hospital care and OECD countries. Study quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. We used framework analysis, narrative synthesis and summary statistics.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles were included. Sixty-two implementation strategies were reported, used in different combinations and ranged between 1 and 16 strategies per initiative. Most frequently reported strategies were educational session(s) and implementation supporting materials. The most commonly reported barrier and facilitator were respectively insufficient healthcare professionals' time and resources; and guideline's credibility, evidence base and relevance. Eighty-five percent of initiatives that measured impact achieved improvements in adoption, knowledge, behavior and/or clinical outcomes. No clear optimal approach for improving guideline uptake and impact was found. However, we found indications that employing multiple active implementation strategies and involving external organizations and hospital staff were associated with improvements.

CONCLUSION

Guideline organizations employ diverse implementation strategies and encounter multiple barriers and facilitators. Our study uncovered potential effective implementation practices. However, further research is needed on effective tailoring of implementation approaches to increase uptake and impact of guidelines.

Qualitative evaluation of a guideline supporting shared decision making for extreme preterm birth

Background and objectives: The decision to attempt resuscitation or provide palliative care at birth for extremely preterm infants between 22 and 25 weeks remains complex. The purpose of this study was to identify facilitators and barriers to implementation of a clinical practice guideline developed to support shared decision-making for these cases.Methods: A purposeful sample of healthcare providers, involved in the care of one of five cases of anticipated extremely preterm birth, was recruited for interviews. Participants shared their views on the guideline content, implementation process, and facilitators and barriers encountered. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative content analysis was used to code, categorize, and thematically describe the data. The Knowledge-Attitudes-Behaviours framework was used to organize the findings.Results: Twenty-five key informants (16 physicians, nine nurses) were interviewed. Participants described varying levels of knowledge of the guideline. Facilitators to implementation included: (1) an awareness of, familiarity with and belief in the content; (2) hard copy and electronic guideline accessibility; and, (3) institutional expertise to provide necessary care. Barriers included: (1) minimal awareness or familiarity with the content; (2) lack of agreement with the recommendations; (3) inadequate evidence and applicability to support changes in practice; and, (4) lack of resources to care for the most immature infants.Conclusions: Identified facilitators and barriers will inform the development of tailored strategies for improved local and future broader implementation. Other institutions can use the results to facilitate implementation of their guidelines on this ethically charged area.

A Multifaceted Intervention to Reduce Pediatric Acid-Suppressant Prescriptions for Gastroesophageal Reflux: What Have We Learned?

OBJECTIVE

Acid-suppressant prescriptions for children have increased over past decades, despite guideline recommendations to prescribe prudently. Acid suppressants are often ineffective and may lead to side effects. We aimed to reduce inappropriate acid-suppressant prescriptions for gastroesophageal reflux in a tertiary care setting through active implementation of national guideline recommendations and to evaluate intervention effect.

METHODS

Implementation consisted of 2 steps. First, all pediatric clinicians in an academic hospital received information on appropriate acid-suppressant prescribing, a link to an online national guideline application and summary card with important evidence-based recommendations-Wise Choices. Hereafter, clinicians prescribing acid suppressants were contacted to provide feedback on indications and to assess their knowledge of the guideline and Wise Choices. The pharmacy database supplied prescription data before, during, and after this intervention.

RESULTS

During the study period prescriptions ranged from 115 to 201/month. Ten months postintervention, a nonsignificant decrease of 4 prescriptions/month was measured (95% confidence interval -49-41). Of the 78 prescribers 76 were successfully contacted: 63% were familiar with the guideline and 45% with Wise Choices. Thirty percent of prescriptions were for gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

CONCLUSION

This multifaceted implementation strategy did not lead to a significant difference in acid-suppressant prescriptions by tertiary care clinicians of whom the majority was familiar with the gastroesophageal reflux disease guideline. Future studies should clarify, which implementation strategies are most effective in reducing inappropriate prescribing of acid suppressants for children. Uniform registration of prescriptions and indications in a national database will enable monitoring of the intervention effect.

Basics of fluid and blood transfusion therapy in paediatric surgical patients

Perioperative fluid, electrolyte and blood transfusion therapy for infants and children can be confusing due the numerous opinions, formulas and clinical applications, which can result in a picture that is not practical and is often misleading. Perioperatively, crystalloids, colloids and blood components are required to meet the ongoing losses and for maintaining cardiovascular stability to sustain adequate tissue perfusion. Recently controversies have been raised regarding historically used formulas and practices of glucose containing hypotonic maintenance crystalloid solutions for perioperative fluid therapy in children. Paediatric intraoperative transfusion therapy, particularly the approach to massive blood transfusion (blood loss ≥ one blood volume) can be quite complex because of the unique relationship between the patient's blood volume and the volume of the individual blood product transfused. A meticulous fluid, electrolyte and blood transfusion management is required in paediatric patients perioperatively because of an extremely limited margin for error. This article reviews the basic concepts in perioperative fluid and blood transfusion therapy for paediatric patients, along with recent recommendations. For this review, Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, HINARI and Google scholar were searched without date restrictions. Search terms included the following in various combinations: Perioperative, fluid therapy, paediatrics, blood transfusion, electrolyte disturbances and guidelines. Only articles with English translation were used.