How common are long-lasting, intensely itching vaccination granulomas and contact allergy to aluminium induced by currently used pediatric vaccines? A prospective cohort study

An Unexpected Post-Egg-Free Influenza Vaccine Granulomatous Reaction

ABSTRACT

A 53-year-old woman presented with a pruritic plaque on the left upper arm that appeared following an egg-free flu vaccine due to a history of reaction to the standard vaccine. The affected area enlarged over a several month period immediately following vaccine administration. Physical examination revealed an 8 × 4 cm coalescent pink plaque on the left upper arm. A shave biopsy of the lesion showed dermal "naked" granulomas, or granulomas with sparse lymphocytic infiltrate at the margins, as typically seen in sarcoidosis. No foreign material was seen in the granulomatous reaction, including with polarization. Special stains, including acid fast bacilli, Grocott methenamine silver, periodic acid-Schiff, and Gram, were negative for organisms. The diagnosis of granulomatous dermatitis was made. Subsequent imaging demonstrated no findings suggestive of sarcoidosis. While vaccine-associated hypersensitivity reactions occur frequently, these reactions are typically due to individual vaccine components, such as egg protein, and do not normally result in the formulation of granulomas. Vaccination-induced granulomas are more often associated with the use of aluminum as an adjuvant; however, this is not present in the egg-free influenza vaccine. Thus, a granulomatous reaction to the egg-free influenza vaccine is very unusual and, to our knowledge, not previously reported.

Adverse reactions after oral provocation with aluminium in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy

BACKGROUND

According to their parents, some children with aluminium contact allergy and vaccination granulomas may react to aluminium-containing foods by developing dermatitis, granuloma itch and subjective symptoms.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to determine whether oral intake of aluminium-containing pancakes can cause adverse events and/or systemic contact dermatitis (SCD) in children with vaccination granulomas and aluminium contact allergy.

PATIENTS/METHODS

A total of 15 children aged 3-9 years (mean age, 5 years) with vaccination granulomas and positive patch-test results to aluminium chloride hexahydrate 2%/10% pet. completed a 3-week blinded randomized controlled crossover oral aluminium/placebo provocation study with pancakes. Granuloma itch and other subjective symptoms were evaluated daily on a visual analogue scale (VAS). Dermatitis was evaluated by the primary investigator, and sleep patterns were tracked with an electronic device. Aluminium bioavailability was assessed by measuring aluminium excretion in the urine. The children served as their own controls with the placebo provocations.

RESULTS

All 15 children completed the study. The mean VAS scores were slightly higher during aluminium provocations compared with placebo for granuloma itch (mean VAS, 1.5 vs. 1.4, p = 0.6) but identical for other subjective symptoms (0.6 vs. 0.6, p = 1). There were no differences in sleep patterns and no significant correlation between urinary aluminium excretion and symptom severity. Three children developed a symmetrical rash on the face or buttocks on day 4 of the aluminium provocations, but not during placebo provocations.

CONCLUSIONS

No difference was found between oral aluminium intake and the occurrence of subjective symptoms and granuloma itch, but on a case-basis oral aluminium may be associated with the development of systemic contact dermatitis.

Persistence of protective anti-poliovirus antibody levels in 4-year-old children previously primed with Picovax®, a trivalent, aluminium-adjuvanted reduced dose inactivated polio vaccine

Background

To meet the demand for effective and affordable inactivated polio vaccines (IPVs), a reduced dose, aluminium hydroxide (Al(OH)₃)-adjuvanted IPV vaccine was developed (IPV-Al, Picovax®) and evaluated in clinical trials. The present trial is an extension of two previous trials (a primary and a booster trial). The aim was to evaluate the persistence of seroprotective antibodies (poliovirus type-specific antibody titre ≥ 8) in 4-year-old children who previously received IPV–Al as primary and booster vaccine doses and to determine the potential booster response and safety profile of an additional dose of IPV-Al.

Methods

Children participating in the two previous trials were invited to receive one additional dose of IPV-Al at 4 years of age (2.5 years after the booster dose) and to have their blood samples collected to measure the pre- and post-vaccination antibody titres. Systemic adverse events (AEs) and local reactogenicity were recorded.

Results

At study entry, the seroprotection rates were 89.2%, 100% and 91.1% against poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The additional vaccination with IPV-Al boosted the level of poliovirus type 1, 2 and 3 antibodies to above the seroprotection threshold for all but one subject, i.e., 99.4% for type 1 and 100% for types 2 and 3. The additional dose induced a robust booster response of a 26.3-, 13.9- and 30.9-fold increase in titre for poliovirus types 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The vaccine was well tolerated, with only mild and transient AEs reported.

Conclusions

The present trial demonstrated that the primary vaccination with an aluminium-adjuvanted reduced dose IPV induced a persistent immune memory as evidenced by the robust anamnestic response when the subjects were re-exposed to the antigen 2.5 years after the last dose. Thus, the IPV-Al is an efficient and safe addition to increase the availability of inactivated polio vaccines globally. (ClinicalTrials.gov reg no. NCT04448132).

Long-term clinical course and prognosis of vaccine-related persistent itching nodules (1997-2019): An observational study

•

Vaccine-induced itching nodules almost always resolve over time.

•

The symptoms may last up to six years though diminishing with time.

•

Contact allergy to aluminium is not a cause to refrain from further vaccination.

•

Vaccination can continue once the nodule has vanished and the itching has resolved.

Background

Vaccines adsorbed to aluminium can induce long-lasting intensely itching subcutaneous nodules (granulomas) at the injection site as well as contact allergy to aluminium. In clinical trials of a new acellular pertussis vaccine performed in the 1990s (Gothenburg, Sweden) with 76 000 participants, itching nodules were reported in 745 children. A positive patch test to aluminium was verified in 77% of the tested children with itchy nodules.

Aim

To describe the long-term clinical course and prognosis of vaccine-related itching nodules caused by aluminium-containing pediatric vaccines and to estimate the risk for new symptoms after future vaccination with aluminium-containing vaccines.

Methods

745 children with vaccine-related itching nodules were followed by regular interviews/questionnaires for more than 20 years. 723 of them received a booster dose of diphtheria/tetanus vaccine either with or without aluminium adjuvant during the follow-up time.

Results

Most study participants (86%) reported a full recovery from their itching nodules after a median duration of 6.6 years. Only a few of the diphtheria/tetanus-booster-vaccinated children (3%) reported mild transient itching and swelling at the new injection site.

Conclusion

Vaccine-induced itching granulomas caused by an aluminium-adsorbed acellular pertussis toxoid vaccine seem to disappear over time. Future vaccinations with aluminium-adsorbed vaccines can be performed with little risk for new itching nodules later in life.

Risk factors for granulomas in children following immunisation with aluminium adsorbed vaccines: A Danish population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Aluminium adsorbed vaccines may in some children cause severely itching nodules at the injection site, known as vaccination granulomas.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate vaccine-, child- and maternal level risk factors for the development of vaccination granulomas following immunisation with aluminium adsorbed vaccines.

METHODS

A Danish population-based cohort study with 553 932 children born in Denmark from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018, vaccinated with an aluminium adsorbed vaccine during the first year of life, followed until 31 December 2020. Poisson regression was used to estimate granuloma rate ratios according to type of adjuvant, accumulated dose of aluminium, timing of vaccination appointments, sex, gestational age, having siblings with granulomas, maternal age, and maternal ethnicity.

RESULTS

We identified 1 901 vaccination granuloma cases (absolute risk, 0.34%). Among vaccine level factors, revaccination (third vs first vaccination appointment, adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.55), the specific adjuvant used (aluminium phosphate vs hydroxide, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70) and dosage (≥1.0 mg vs <1.0 mg, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.52) were associated with risk of granulomas; the timing of vaccination appointments was not. Among child level factors, female sex (vs males, RR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.02-1.22), prematurity (vs term birth, RR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.54-0.93) and having sibling(s) with granulomas (vs no siblings with granulomas, RR 46.15, 95% CI, 33.67-63.26) were associated with risk of granulomas. Among maternal level factors, non-Danish ethnicity (vs. Danish, RR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.42-0.63) and young maternal age (<20 yrs. vs 20-39 yrs., RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.83) were associated with risk of granulomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Several risk factors for vaccination granulomas at both the vaccine, child, and maternal level, was identified. Reducing the dose of aluminium or replacing aluminium hydroxide with aluminium phosphate could reduce the risk of granulomas. However, this must be balanced against the potential for reduced immunogenicity.

Murine Q Fever Vaccination Model Reveals Sex Dimorphism in Early Phase Delayed-Type Hypersensitivity Responses

Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses to microbial vaccines and related components are a major roadblock for widespread licensing of whole cell vaccines such as that of Q fever. Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by the intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. The only currently licensed vaccine, Q-Vax^®, is a whole cell inactivated formulation that is associated with a potentially severe dermal post vaccination DTH response in previously sensitized individuals. To investigate the underlying immunologic mechanisms of this response and better represent the early-phase DTH response observed in humans, a murine sensitization and skin testing model was developed and employed. Female C57Bl/6J mice displayed the most robust early-phase DTH responses following sensitization and elicitation compared to their male counterparts and other mouse strains. Immunologic responses were measured within the skin, draining lymph nodes, and serum following both sensitization and elicitation with Q fever whole cell vaccines. Local immunologic responses in the dermis were characterized by inflammation primarily involving neutrophils, macrophages, and T cells. Secondary lymphoid organ profiling revealed distinct immunological signatures following both sensitization and elicitation with a sex-based dichotomy in T cell phenotypes and antigen presenting cell numbers. Beyond providing a post-Q fever vaccination DTH model that recapitulates early-phase DTH events, these data suggest that sex is a primary factor influencing the magnitude and composition of the ensuing response.

Subcutaneous nodules following vaccination

Five patients presented to surgical clinics at our institution with subcutaneous nodules of the upper arm or thigh present for 6-18 months. Excisional or fine-needle biopsy was performed due to diagnostic uncertainty and parental concern. Histopathological examination revealed these to be cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia in reaction to vaccine components. Nodular reactions with this histopathological pattern are well recognised within vaccine-related literature, but less commonly recognised in patients presenting to general paediatric or surgical clinics. This article reviews literature on delayed-onset nodule formation after vaccination and recommends observation and reassurance as mainstays of management of this largely benign entity.

Aluminum-Allergen of the Year 2022

ABSTRACT

Exposure to elemental aluminum and its salts is unavoidable. Aluminum as a metal is present in transport, construction, packaging, and electronic equipment. Aluminum salts are present in consumer products, food items and drinking water, vaccines, drugs, and antiperspirants. Aluminum in vaccines and preparations for allergen-specific immunotherapy are the major sensitization sources. The predominent clinical manifestations of aluminum allergy are pruritic subcutaneous nodules and eczematous dermatitis. Patch testing shall be performed with aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH) in petrolatum. The preparation with ACH 10% detects substantially more aluminum allergy than ACH 2%. A patch test with elemental aluminum, for example, an empty Finn Chamber, is only positive when there is a strong aluminum allergy. A patch test reading should be performed 1 week after the application so as not to miss 15% to 20% of aluminum allergy. Aluminum should be included in any baseline patch test series for children and investigated for a possible inclusion in baseline series for adults. Aluminum test chambers can interfere with the testing resulting in both false-negative and false-positive patch test reactions to nonaluminum contact sensitizers.

Evaluation of Adverse Reactions to Vaccines

The development and widespread use of vaccination over the past centuries has been the single most impactful intervention in public health, by effectively preventing morbidity and mortality from infectious diseases. Vaccination is generally well tolerated in the vast majority of the population, and the benefits of vaccination largely outweigh the risk of severe adverse events in the majority of patients. Vaccine hesitancy can be a significant concern and lead to infectious disease outbreaks. All health care providers play an important role in maintaining public confidence in vaccines because their attitude and knowledge is often critical in facilitating acceptance of a vaccine. The purpose of this review is to first, provide an understanding of the basic concepts that are relevant to vaccine pharmacovigilance, and secondly, to provide an overview and discuss management of both immune and nonimmune adverse events after vaccination.

The Evaluation of Palpable Thigh Nodularity in Vaccination-age Children - Differentiating Vaccination Granulomas from Other Causes

Palpable thigh nodularity is a relatively frequent indication for imaging of vaccination-age children, with patients often referred by their community physician or general practitioner. Ultrasound (US) is the imaging modality of choice to delineate the abnormality, and we present a number of characteristic findings that permit the radiologist and pediatrician to accurately identify the cause. A retrospective review was performed at the largest children's hospital in a European country between 2015 and 2017 over a 30-month period. A search was performed of the hospital's Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) for all children referred for a soft-tissue, upper limb, or lower limb US between January 2015 and July 2017. The findings were collated and stored in a spreadsheet. Nine patients were identified who developed subcutaneous nodules in the thigh at some point during their childhood vaccination schedule. Three of these patients had clinical histories strongly suggestive of a diagnosis of abscess or foreign body. The remaining six patients were selected for more in-depth analysis. Four of these patients had US features consistent with vaccination granuloma. Two patients were ultimately diagnosed with venolymphatic malformations. Palpable thigh nodularity in a child of vaccination age is encountered with a reasonable frequency. When encountered, granulomas tend to be located within the subcutaneous tissues, and we postulate that this is due to erroneous administration of a vaccine into the subcutis rather than into the muscle.

Widespread cutaneous eruption after aluminum-containing vaccination: A case report and review of current literature

Aluminum salts are adjuvants found in many vaccines. Although rare, patients have reported cutaneous reactions to aluminum salts including persistent pruritic subcutaneous nodules at the injection site. We report the case of an 11-year-old male who at the age of 5 years developed a generalized pruritic cutaneous eruption after receiving the aluminum-containing Quadracel^® vaccination. Patch testing at that time was positive to aluminum salts and again on repeat patch testing 6 years later. Our case highlights a delayed systemic cutaneous reaction to a vaccine containing aluminum salts. We review cutaneous allergic reactions to vaccines containing aluminum salts and vaccination advice for patients with aluminum contact allergy.

Granulomas in Dermatopathology: Principal Diagnoses - Part 1

This series of 2 articles on dermatopathologic diagnoses reviews conditions in which granulomas form. Part 1 clarifies concepts, discusses the presentation of different types of granulomas and giant cells, and considers a large variety of noninfectious diseases. Some granulomatous diseases have a metabolic origin, as in necrobiosis lipoidica. Others, such as granulomatous mycosis fungoides, are related to lymphomas. Still others, such as rosacea, are so common that dermatologists see them nearly daily in clinical practice.

Aluminium contact allergy without vaccination granulomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Aluminium contact allergy is mainly seen as granulomas following immunization with aluminium-adsorbed vaccines and contact allergy following epicutaneous exposure may be overlooked. To investigate the prevalence of aluminium allergy confirmed by patch testing, with no association with vaccination granulomas, and explore whether epicutaneous exposure to aluminium can contribute to allergic contact dermatitis. Two authors independently searched PubMed and MEDLINE (OVID) for case studies on contact allergy to aluminium proven by patch testing. Age-stratified meta-analyses to calculate the pooled prevalence were performed. Twenty-five studies describing a total of 73 cases were included in the review. Seven studies were suitable for meta-analyses. The prevalence of aluminium contact allergy was 5.61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12%-11.08%) for children and 0.36% (95% CI 0.04%-0.67%) for adults. The studies described a variety of epicutaneous exposures, where metallic aluminium, topical medicaments, and deodorants were the main sources. Aluminium sensitization without a known exposure source was described in 10 of the 25 articles. The prevalence of aluminium contact allergy in the general public may be higher than expected and not solely related to vaccination granulomas. However, the clinical relevance is rare if not related to granulomas.

Diagnosis and management of hypersensitivity reactions to vaccines

INTRODUCTION

Many countries in Europe now recommend and enforce mandatory vaccinations to improve vaccination coverage. Thus, the number of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) may show an increase. Among these events, severe hypersensitivity reactions to vaccines are rare. However, it is important that they be identified and recognized so that they may be adequately managed.

AREAS COVERED

The literature search was undertaken through PubMed and Embase to identify English-language papers focusing on hypersensitivity to vaccines.

EXPERT OPINION

Hypersensitivity reactions following vaccinations are rare and are classified according to their chronology and extension: immediate when they occur within the first 4 hours following administration and non-immediate when they occur later. Local reactions are the most common adverse event following injection of vaccines and generally do not require any allergy workup. Immediate reactions, however, are potentially IgE-mediated and require an allergy workup. In general, a previously known food allergy (i.e., egg or milk) is not a contraindication to immunizations. Patients with a known allergy to gelatin, yeast, latex, antibiotics, or other specific components of vaccines require an allergy workup before administration of the vaccine.

Harnessing co-operative immune augmentation by contact allergens to enhance the efficacy of viral vaccines

Although the development of successful vaccines against coronaviruses may be achieved, for some individuals the immune response that they stimulate may prove to be insufficient for effective host defence. The principle that a relatively strong contact allergen will have an enhancing effect on sensitization compared with a less potent contact allergen if they are co-administered, may not, at first, appear relevant to this issue. However, this augmentation effect is thought to be due to the sharing of common or complementary pathways. Here, we briefly consider aspects of the shared and complementary pathways between skin sensitization induced by exposure to a contact allergen and the immune response to viruses, with particular reference to COVID-19. The relationship leads us to explore whether this principle, which we name here as "co-operative immune augmentation" may be extended to include viral vaccination. We consider evidence that even relatively weak contact allergens, used in vaccines for other purposes, can show enhanced sensitization, which is in keeping with a co-operative augmentation principle. Finally, we consider how the potent contact allergen diphenylcyclopropenone could be employed safely as an enhancer of vaccine responses.

Subcutaneous nodules following immunization in children; in Victoria, Australia from 2007 to 2016

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous nodules are a rare adverse event following immunization (AEFI). We aimed to describe nodules at the injection site reported to SAEFVIC (Surveillance of Adverse Events Following Vaccination in the Community) using the Brighton Collaboration Case Definition (BCCD), management and recurrence following subsequent immunizations.

METHOD

We assessed 58 cases (<18 years of age) of 'nodule at injection site' reported to SAEFVIC, Melbourne, Australia, between May 2007 and June 2016. Case details were analyzed from records and phone interview follow-up. The Australian Immunization Registry was reviewed for immunization status.

RESULTS

71% (41/58 reported cases) were consistent with the BCCD for subcutaneous nodule, 14% (8 cases) were 'possible subcutaneous nodules', 10% (6 cases) were nodules associated with BCG immunization and 5% (3 cases) were attributable to an alternative diagnosis. The median age at immunization was 12 months, (range 1 month-12 years); 54% male (22/41 cases). 17% (7 cases) had multiple nodules. Nodules were associated with immunizations containing aluminum (74%, 36/49 nodules), no aluminum (8%, 4 nodules) and unknown (18%, 9 nodules). Most cases developed symptoms within 3 days post-immunization (59%, 24 cases) and in the thigh (59%, 29 nodules). Pruritus was associated in 41% (17 cases). Around 1/3 (34%) of nodules resolved 6 months post immunization, 2/3 (68%) by 12 months, however 1/4 (24%) remained persistent for >24 months. 5 cases had prior nodules and 1 case had recurrence with subsequent immunization. 83% (34 cases) were fully immunized for age at follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Subcutaneous nodules at the injection site may occur following a wide range of vaccines, including vaccines without aluminum. All cases require careful review and where possible, specialist management and to support subsequent immunizations.

Sonographic features of vaccination granulomas in children with delayed-type hypersensitivity to aluminum

In this article, we report the sonographic features of vaccination granulomas in three children sensitized to aluminum. Although the recognition of the vaccination granuloma relies on the clinical examination, misdiagnosis is frequent, leading to distressful procedures or prolonged antibiotic administration. In all our cases, sonography revealed a teardrop-shaped echogenic central structure, suggesting the deposition of aluminum crystals along the route of administration with consequent subcutaneous degenerative changes, and a surrounding hypoechoic cap, which reflects the changeable inflammatory reaction and the granuloma formation.

[Postvaccinal complications and management of suspected cases]

In all developed countries there is the possibility to protect oneself from vaccine-preventable diseases. However, not all individuals make use of this option. It is precisely in highly developed countries where a trend to vaccination hesitancy is noticeable, i. e. reluctance to get oneself or one's children vaccinated. The reasons why this is so are many, but the most important reason is the fear of postvaccinal complications, especially of those that imply sequelae or those with fatal outcomes.Whereas there are some proven associations between vaccination and adverse drug reaction, for example febrile seizures after the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination, other hypotheses can be refuted, for example autism after the MMR vaccination. On one hand, this article gives an overview of known postvaccinal complications with indication of a causal association with vaccination and on the other hand addresses hypotheses of potential adverse drug reactions that have been refuted by pharmacoepidemiological studies.Only the scientific debate of these hypotheses, which are repeatedly discussed, especially on social media, can contribute to corroborating or refuting a potential causal association. If evidence for a causal association grows, e. g. intussusception, the relevant authorities (e.g. Paul Ehrlich Institute, European Medicines Agency) will take risk-minimizing measures. If studies and meta-analyses do not reveal any evidence of a causal association, a targeted information strategy will be required in order to prevent myths from circulating, vaccination coverages from declining, and infectious diseases from spreading.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity to vaccine aluminum adjuvant causing subcutaneous leg mass and urticaria in a child

A 3-year-old girl presented with a 7-month history of a waxing and waning left thigh mass associated with pruritus and erythema at the site of two previous DTaP-HepB-IPV vaccinations. Patch testing was positive to aluminum chloride, supporting a diagnosis of vaccine granuloma secondary to aluminum allergy; her symptoms had been well controlled with antihistamines and topical steroids. Injection site granulomas are a benign but potentially bothersome reaction to aluminum-containing immunizations that can be supportively managed, and we encourage strict adherence to the recommended vaccine schedule in this setting. Patch testing is a sensitive, noninvasive diagnostic tool for patients presenting with this clinical finding, and dermatologist awareness can prevent unnecessary medical examination and provide reassurance.

Proposed ICDRG Classification of the Clinical Presentation of Contact Allergy

The International Contact Dermatitis Research Group proposes a classification for the clinical presentation of contact allergy. The classification is based primarily on the mode of clinical presentation. The categories are direct exposure/contact dermatitis, mimicking or exacerbation of preexisting eczema, multifactorial dermatitis including allergic contact dermatitis, by proxy, mimicking angioedema, airborne contact dermatitis, photo-induced contact dermatitis, systemic contact dermatitis, noneczematous contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, protein contact dermatitis, respiratory/mucosal symptoms, oral contact dermatitis, erythroderma/exfoliative dermatitis, minor forms of presentation, and extracutaneous manifestations.

Vaccination and allergy: EAACI position paper, practical aspects

Immunization is highly effective in preventing infectious diseases and therefore an indispensable public health measure. Allergic patients deserve access to the same publicly recommended immunizations as non-allergic patients unless risks associated with vaccination outweigh the gains. Whereas the number of reported possible allergic reactions to vaccines is high, confirmed vaccine-triggered allergic reactions are rare. Anaphylaxis following vaccination is rare, affecting <1/100 000, but can occur in any patient. Some patient groups, notably those with a previous allergic reaction to a vaccine or its components, are at heightened risk of allergic reaction and require special precautions. Allergic reactions, however, may occur in patients without known risk factors and cannot be predicted by currently available tools. Unwarranted fear and uncertainty can result in incomplete vaccination coverage for children and adults with or without allergy. In addition to concerns about an allergic reaction to the vaccine itself, there is fear that routine childhood immunization may promote the development of allergic sensitization and disease. Thus, although there is no evidence that routine childhood immunization increases the risk of allergy development, such risks need to be discussed.

First-in-human safety and immunogenicity investigations of three adjuvanted reduced dose inactivated poliovirus vaccines (IPV-Al SSI) compared to full dose IPV Vaccine SSI when given as a booster vaccination to adolescents with a history of IPV vaccination at 3, 5, 12months and 5years of age

•

Three adjuvanted reduced dose IPV-Al SSI were safe and immunogenic in adolescents.

•

The three IPV-Al SSI were highly immunogenic, but inferior to IPV Vaccine SSI as a booster.

•

Reduced dose IPV-Al SSI is intended for markets in need of affordable IPV.

Background

There is a demand of affordable IPV in the World. Statens Serum Institut (SSI) has developed three reduced dose IPV formulations adsorbed to aluminium hydroxide; 1/3 IPV-Al, 1/5 IPV-Al and 1/10 IPV-Al SSI, and now report the results of the first investigations in humans.

Methods

240 Danish adolescents, aged 10–15 years, and childhood vaccinated with IPV were booster vaccinated with 1/3 IPV-Al, 1/5 IPV-Al, 1/10 IPV-Al or IPV Vaccine SSI. The booster effects (GMTRs) of the three IPV-Al SSI were compared to IPV Vaccine SSI, and evaluated for non-inferiority.

Immunogenicity results

The pre-vaccination GMTs were similar across the groups; 926 (type 1), 969 (type 2) and 846 (type 3) in the total trial population.

The GMTRs by poliovirus type and IPV formulation were:

Type 1: 17.0 (1/3 IPV-Al), 13.0 (1/5 IPV-Al), 7.1 (1/10 IPV-Al) and 42.2 (IPV Vaccine SSI).

Type 2: 12.5 (1/3 IPV-Al), 13.1 (1/5 IPV-Al), 7.6 (1/10 IPV-Al) and 47.8 (IPV Vaccine SSI).

Type 3: 14.5 (1/3 IPV-Al), 16.2 (1/5 IPV-Al), 8.9 (1/10 IPV-Al) and 62.4 (IPV Vaccine SSI)

Thus, the three IPV-Al formulations were highly immunogenic, but inferior to IPV Vaccine SSI, in this booster vaccination trial.

Safety results

No SAE and no AE of severe intensity occurred. 59.2% of the subjects reported at least one AE. Injection site pain was the most frequent AE in all groups; from 24.6% to 43.3%. Injection site redness and swelling frequencies were < 5% in most and < 10% in all groups. The most frequent systemic AEs were fatigue (from 8.2% to 15.0%) and headache (from 15.0% to 28.3%). Most AEs were of mild intensity. In conclusion, the three IPV-Al SSI were safe in adolescents and the booster effects were satisfactory.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT02280447.

Case Report of Subcutaneous Nodules and Sterile Abscesses Due to Delayed Type Hypersensitivity to Aluminum-Containing Vaccines

Routine childhood immunizations have resulted in great reductions in vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. Vaccine-related adverse events, albeit rare, can be of significant consequence. Although anaphylaxis, or type I hypersensitivity, is recognized as a potential reaction after vaccination, delayed type hypersensitivity or type IV reactions are less so. We present a case of persistent subcutaneous nodules and sterile abscesses in the setting of delayed type hypersensitivity to aluminum, confirmed by patch testing and recurrence on re-exposure. We review sources of aluminum in common immunizations, principles for treatment, and strategies for management of future vaccinations for this patient.

International Consensus (ICON): allergic reactions to vaccines

BACKGROUND

Routine immunization, one of the most effective public health interventions, has effectively reduced death and morbidity due to a variety of infectious diseases. However, allergic reactions to vaccines occur very rarely and can be life threatening. Given the large numbers of vaccines administered worldwide, there is a need for an international consensus regarding the evaluation and management of allergic reactions to vaccines.

METHODS

Following a review of the literature, and with the active participation of representatives from the World Allergy Organization (WAO), the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI), and the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (ACAAI), the final committee was formed with the purpose of having members who represented a wide-range of countries, had previously worked on vaccine safety, and included both allergist/immunologists as well as vaccinologists.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on a variety of topics, including: definition of immediate allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, approaches to distinguish association from causality, approaches to patients with a history of an allergic reaction to a previous vaccine, and approaches to patients with a history of an allergic reaction to components of vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS

This document provides comprehensive and internationally accepted guidelines and access to on-line documents to help practitioners around the world identify allergic reactions following immunization. It also provides a framework for the evaluation and further management of patients who present either following an allergic reaction to a vaccine or with a history of allergy to a component of vaccines.

Injection Site Lichenoid Dermatitis Following Pneumococcal Vaccination: Report and Review of Cutaneous Conditions Occurring at Vaccination Sites

Background

Cutaneous dermatoses and malignancies have occurred at the sites of vaccines.

Purpose

To describe a man who developed a lichenoid dermatitis at the pneumococcal vaccine injection site and to review cutaneous dermatoses and malignancies occurring at vaccination sites.

Methods

PubMed was used to search the following terms, separately and in combination: adverse, condition, cutaneous, dermatosis, dermatitis, injection, PCV13, pneumococcal, pneumonia, prevnar, reaction, skin, site, vaccination, and vaccine. All papers were reviewed, and relevant manuscripts, along with their reference citations, were evaluated.

Results

Several vaccines—including bacillus Calmette-Guerin, hepatitis B, influenza, leishmaniasis, meningitis, pneumococcal, smallpox, tetanus (alone and in combination with diphtheria, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenza type B or plague and yellow fever), and varicella-zoster—have been associated with post-vaccination site reactions. A 70-year-old male developed a lichenoid dermatitis that occurred at the pneumococcal vaccine injection site within 2 weeks after PCV13 vaccination; the erythematous nodule resolved spontaneously within 9 weeks following immunization.

Conclusions

Dermatoses at the injection sites of vaccines can be granulomatous, immunity-related conditions, infections, lichenoid, neutrophilic, or pseudolymphomatous. Basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are the most common vaccination site-associated malignancies; however, melanoma and sarcomas (dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, fibrosarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma) are also smallpox vaccine-related site neoplasms. A cutaneous immunocompromised district that is created by vaccine-induced local immunologic changes is hypothesized to be the pathogenesis of vaccination site reactions.

Protamine-based nanoparticles as new antigen delivery systems

The use of biodegradable nanoparticles as antigen delivery vehicles is an attractive approach to overcome the problems associated with the use of Alum-based classical adjuvants. Herein we report, the design and development of protamine-based nanoparticles as novel antigen delivery systems, using recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen as a model viral antigen. The nanoparticles, composed of protamine and a polysaccharide (hyaluronic acid or alginate), were obtained using a mild ionic cross-linking technique. The size and surface charge of the nanoparticles could be modulated by adjusting the ratio of the components. Prototypes with optimal physicochemical characteristics and satisfactory colloidal stability were selected for the assessment of their antigen loading capacity, antigen stability during storage and in vitro and in vivo proof-of-concept studies. In vitro studies showed that antigen-loaded nanoparticles induced the secretion of cytokines by macrophages more efficiently than the antigen in solution, thus indicating a potential adjuvant effect of the nanoparticles. Finally, in vivo studies showed the capacity of these systems to trigger efficient immune responses against the hepatitis B antigen following intramuscular administration, suggesting the potential interest of protamine-polysaccharide nanoparticles as antigen delivery systems.

Exposure to mercury and aluminum in early life: developmental vulnerability as a modifying factor in neurologic and immunologic effects

Currently, ethylmercury (EtHg) and adjuvant-Al are the dominating interventional exposures encountered by fetuses, newborns, and infants due to immunization with Thimerosal-containing vaccines (TCVs). Despite their long use as active agents of medicines and fungicides, the safety levels of these substances have never been determined, either for animals or for adult humans—much less for fetuses, newborns, infants, and children. I reviewed the literature for papers reporting on outcomes associated with (a) multiple exposures and metabolism of EtHg and Al during early life; (b) physiological and metabolic characteristics of newborns, neonates, and infants relevant to xenobiotic exposure and effects; (c) neurobehavioral, immunological, and inflammatory reactions to Thimerosal and Al-adjuvants resulting from TCV exposure in infancy. Immunological and neurobehavioral effects of Thimerosal-EtHg and Al-adjuvants are not extraordinary; rather, these effects are easily detected in high and low income countries, with co-exposure to methylmercury (MeHg) or other neurotoxicants. Rigorous and replicable studies (in different animal species) have shown evidence of EtHg and Al toxicities. More research attention has been given to EtHg and findings have showed a solid link with neurotoxic effects in humans; however, the potential synergic effect of both toxic agents has not been properly studied. Therefore, early life exposure to both EtHg and Al deserves due consideration.