Twenty years of quantitative instrumental measures of swallowing in children: a systematic review

Pediatric Dysphagia Risk Screening Instrument (PDRSI) in Children With Cerebral Palsy

This study aimed to evaluate whether the Pediatric Dysphagia Risk Screening Instrument (PDRSI) was a suitable test for children with cerebral palsy (CP) and assess the instrument's Turkish validity and reliability. One-hundred twenty-six children with CP participated in this study. "Cronbach's alpha (ɑ)," "Cronbach's ɑ when one item is deleted," "inter-item correlation," and "corrected item-to-total correlation" were used to assess internal consistency. In addition, inter-rater agreement tests (Cohen's kappa coefficient) were conducted for reliability. Construct validity was used to assess the validity. Moreover, flexible fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of the swallowing method was used to describe the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calculate the sensitivity and specificity of T-PDRSI. It was found that the PDRSI had adequate validity and reliability. The PDRSI can be used in children with CP as a valid and reliable instrument with high sensitivity and specificity.

Aspiration in the First Year of Life and Later Tube Feeding: A Retrospective Cohort from a Low-Income Country

The objective of this study is to investigate in infants submitted to videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) during the first year of life, the association between aspiration and later tube feeding, and to identify potential risk factors related to feeding route outcome. Retrospective cohort study with data from electronic health records was performed. Data were collected from infants < 12 months of age who underwent VFSS during inpatient hospital stay in the period between 2013 and 2018. Patient charts after 24 months of age were reviewed to ascertain the outcome and study factors, including VFSS findings, neonatal data, clinical comorbidities, nutritional status, ICU admissions, and hospital readmissions. Relative risk (RR) for tube feeding was calculated, and a Poisson regression with robust variance was used to identify potential risk factors. VFSS data from 164 patients < 1 year old were retrieved, of whom 112 (68%) contributed with data about feeding route after 2 years of age. Most infants were preterm < 37 weeks (66%), with a median age of 9.28 weeks at the time of the exam. Aspiration occurred in 33% of the patients, with no statistically significant difference between full-term or premature infants (p = 0.173). The relative risk of tube feeding after the age of 2 among infants who aspirated in VFSS was 0.74 (CI 0.25-2.16, p = 0.573). Poisson regression analysis showed that number of hospital readmissions (RR 1.04, 95%CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.005) and gestational age < 34 weeks (RR 0.26, 95%CI 0.07-0.089, p = 0.032) were associated with later tube feeding. Early VFSS findings have low predictive value regarding later feeding route. Aspiration events should be considered as complementary information for clinical decision.

Dysphagia Management in Children: Implementation and Perspectives of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES)

Dysphagia is any impairment of swallowing that compromises the safety, efficiency, or adequacy of nutritional or liquid intake. It is common in children, especially in some clinical populations, and may result in failure to thrive and respiratory problems due to pulmonary aspiration. Swallowing disorders have a severe impact on children's health, growth, and development, and on the quality of life of the child and family. Clinical evaluation cannot validly predict aspiration, which is mostly silent. A team management approach is advocated, including instrumental swallowing assessments. FEES has been proven to be safe and valid and is increasingly used in children of all ages. It allows the identification of structural abnormalities, assessment of the child's diet with real-life food and liquids while the child holds the optimal or preferred position, examination during breastfeeding, and assessment of fatigue and treatment strategies. FEES is carried out following a protocol that comprises three parts: the evaluation of the anatomical and physiological parameters of swallowing, testing of food and liquids of a range of different consistencies, and evaluation of treatment methods. Pediatric FEES involves adaptations for infants, and special considerations about readiness for nutritive trials and the infant's ability to sustain a coordinated feeding pattern. Varying consistencies and volumes of food or liquids are tried. Care of the dysphagic child involves team work. FEES, as a part of the assessment and management of dysphagia, enables the evaluation of the safety, efficiency, and adequacy of oral food and liquid intake. Future perspectives include standardized training in clinical FEES protocols to ensure clinical competency of the pediatric FESS team members and the development and validation of standardized examination and interpretation protocols for pediatric FEES.

A preliminary deep learning study on automatic segmentation of contrast-enhanced bolus in videofluorography of swallowing

Although videofluorography (VFG) is an effective tool for evaluating swallowing functions, its accurate evaluation requires considerable time and effort. This study aimed to create a deep learning model for automated bolus segmentation on VFG images of patients with healthy swallowing and dysphagia using the artificial intelligence deep learning segmentation method, and to assess the performance of the method. VFG images of 72 swallowing of 12 patients were continuously converted into 15 static images per second. In total, 3910 images were arbitrarily assigned to the training, validation, test 1, and test 2 datasets. In the training and validation datasets, images of colored bolus areas were prepared, along with original images. Using a U-Net neural network, a trained model was created after 500 epochs of training. The test datasets were applied to the trained model, and the performances of automatic segmentation (Jaccard index, Sørensen-Dice coefficient, and sensitivity) were calculated. All performance values for the segmentation of the test 1 and 2 datasets were high, exceeding 0.9. Using an artificial intelligence deep learning segmentation method, we automatically segmented the bolus areas on VFG images; our method exhibited high performance. This model also allowed assessment of aspiration and laryngeal invasion.

Pediatric dysphagia overview: best practice recommendation study by multidisciplinary experts

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no comprehensive and multidisciplinary recommendation study covering all aspects of pediatric dysphagia (PD). This study aimed to generate PD management recommendations with methods that can be used in clinical practice to fill this gap in our country and in the world, from the perspective of experienced multidisciplinary experts.

METHODS

This recommendation paper was generated by a multidisciplinary team, using the seven-step process and a three-round modified Delphi survey via e-mail. First, ten open-ended questions were created, and then detailed recommendations including management, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were created with the answers from these questions. Each recommendation item was voted on by the experts as overall consensus (strong recommendation), approaching consensus (weak recommendation) and divergent consensus (not recommended).

RESULTS

In the 1st Delphi round, a questionnaire of 414 items was prepared based on the experts' responses to ten open-ended questions. In the 2nd Delphi round, 59.2% of these items were accepted as pre-recommendation. In the 3rd Delphi round, 62.6% of 246 items were accepted for inclusion in the proposals. The final version recommendations consisted of 154 items.

CONCLUSIONS

This study includes comprehensive and detailed answers for every problem that could be posed in clinical practice for the management of PD, and recommendations are for all pediatric patients with both oropharyngeal and esophageal dysphagia.

A Comparative Assessment of the Diagnosis of Swallowing Impairment and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Canines and Humans

Swallowing impairment is a highly prevalent and clinically significant problem affecting people and dogs. There are myriad causes of swallowing impairment of which gastroesophageal reflux is the most common in both species. Similarities in anatomy and physiology between humans and canines results in analogous swallowing disorders including cricopharyngeus muscle achalasia, esophageal achalasia, hiatal herniation, and gastroesophageal reflux with secondary esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility. Accordingly, the diagnostic approach to human and canine patients with swallowing impairment is similar. Diagnostic procedures such as swallowing fluoroscopy, high-resolution manometry, pH/impedance monitoring, and endolumenal functional luminal imaging probe can be performed in both species; however, nasofacial conformation, increased esophageal length, and the difficulty of completing several of these procedures in awake dogs are inherent challenges that need to be considered. Human patients can convey their symptoms and respond to verbal cues, whereas veterinarians must rely on clinical histories narrated by pet owners followed by comprehensive physical examination and observation of the animal eating different food consistencies and drinking water. Dogs may also be unwilling to drink or eat in the hospital setting and may be resistant to physical restraint during diagnostic procedures. Despite the species differences and diagnostic challenges, dogs are a natural animal model for many oropharyngeal and esophageal disorders affecting people, which presents a tremendous opportunity for shared learnings. This manuscript reviews the comparative aspects of esophageal anatomy and physiology between humans and canines, summarizes the diagnostic assessment of swallowing impairment in both species, and discusses future considerations for collaborative medicine and translational research.

Developing a Protocol for Quantitative Analysis of Liquid Swallowing in Children

PURPOSE

Objective measures in videofluoroscopic swallow studies (VFSSs) can quantify swallow biomechanics. There are a wide array of validated measures studied in infants, children, and adults. There is a need for a pediatric VFSS protocol that consists of a small number of vital, time efficient, and clinically relevant measures. In this study, we aimed to establish a standard protocol for quantitative VFSS analysis in children.

METHOD

Protocol development began with a systematic literature review, which identified 22 quantitative and eight descriptive measures available in the literature. A pediatric VFSS database of 553 children was collected using a standardized VFSS protocol. Studies were evaluated using the 30 previously reported measures covering displacement and timing parameters as well as penetration-aspiration and residue. Measures were tested for rater reliability and internal consistency. Measures meeting acceptable values for protocol inclusion were included in the final protocol (Cronbach's alpha > .53).

RESULTS

Interrater and intrarater reliability of 17 measures met acceptable reliability levels. During internal consistency testing, we removed six further measures based on Cronbach's alpha levels indicating that two or more measures were equivalent in measuring the same aspect of swallow biomechanics in children. A VFSS protocol of reliable, valid, and obtainable objective quantitative (n = 6) and descriptive measures (n = 3) with separate protocols for young infants (≤ 9 months) and older children was established.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized quantitative VFSS protocol for children has been developed to suit two age groups (≤ 9 and > 9 months old). Consistent VFSS administration and reporting support assessment over time and across disease groups. Future research should focus on how this information can be used by clinicians to produce individualized treatment plans for children with swallowing impairment.

Enhanced rapid review of the applicability of ultrasound in the assessment of sucking, swallowing and laryngeal function in the paediatric population

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has renewed interest in the use of ultrasound (US) amongst dysphagia-trained clinicians working with infants and children. US is a portable, minimally intrusive tool which carries reduced risk of aerosol-generation provoked by other instrumental swallowing assessment tools such as fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). For this reason, US could be a valuable addition to the dysphagia assessment toolkit. A recently published rapid review of US evidence for the assessment of swallowing and laryngeal function in the adult population provided a framework for this neonatal and paediatric review.

AIMS

This enhanced rapid review aimed to establish the applicability of US as an instrumental assessment tool for sucking, swallowing and laryngeal function in the neonatal and paediatric populations.

METHODS & PROCEDURES

A rapid review of six electronic databases was conducted to identify articles using US to assess sucking, swallowing or laryngeal function in the selected populations, compared with varied reference tests. Abstract screening was completed according to pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria with 10% of articles assessed by a second screener. Data was extracted from the included studies using a pre-developed form. A modified QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess study quality. Results from the included studies were summarised and grouped into sucking, swallowing and laryngeal function data.

OUTCOMES & RESULTS

Twelve studies using US in the assessment of swallowing and/or laryngeal function met inclusion criteria. No studies using US for assessment of sucking met the inclusion criteria. All were peer-reviewed, primary studies across a range of clinical populations and with a wide geographical spread. Five studies had an overall low risk of bias. Seven studies had at least one domain where risk of bias was judged as high. All studies had high applicability. The two studies assessing swallowing differed in terms of aims and use of US. The studies assessing laryngeal function predominately investigated vocal fold movement and laryngeal pathology. Sensitivity and specificity data were provided or calculated from raw data for nine of the laryngeal function studies (respective ranges of 75%-100% and 80%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS

Emerging evidence exists to support the use of US as adjunct to clinical assessment of swallowing and laryngeal function in the neonatal and paediatric population. A paucity of evidence to support use of US in the assessment of sucking exists. Further research is needed to establish evidence-based assessment and analysis protocols as well as development of paediatric data.

Implementation of Pediatric Flexible-Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research

BACKGROUND

Although pediatric flexible-endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) has developed into a standard in dysphagia diagnostics, there are no valid protocols and procedures for children available to date.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic PROSPERO-registered review aimed to identify implementation protocols for pediatric FEES described in research studies, and to analyze them in detail concerning procedural steps, equipment, and reported outcome.

METHODS

Included were all studies reporting a pediatric FEES protocol for children aged 0-18 years, if they described at least two criteria defined in advance. The databases MEDLINE and CINHAL were searched systematically from January 2000 to February 2021. Risk of bias for included studies was assessed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. A narrative synthesis of the FEES protocols was conducted and the results compared in tabular form.

RESULTS

In total 22 studies were included, reporting on FEES in 1547 infants, children, and adolescents with a wide range of diagnoses. It was possible to identify protocols related to all age groups in general as well as to particular groups such as breastfed or bottle-fed infants. None of the included studies demonstrated a good methodological quality; all studies had missing data. Uniform implementation for sub-groups could not be determined. The reported outcome of FEES examinations could not be compared.

DISCUSSION

None of the included studies showed good methodological quality and a significant amount of data were missing; the review still offers a systematic basis for future research to close the serious gap in the area of pediatric FEES. A proposal is made for a minimum requirement for pediatric FEES protocols in scientific studies.

[Clinicopathological characterization of children with dysphagia, family impact and health-related quality of life of their caregivers]

INTRODUCTION

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (DOF) without proper evaluation can be underdiagnosed in certain groups of the pediatric population. Meeting the needs of these patients can lead to an overload of their caregivers.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of the patients evaluated after starting a monographic DOF clinic (C-DOF) and study whether there are changes at the nutritional level, as well as the burden and impact that caregivers find on quality of life related to health (HRQOL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Descriptive observational study of patients evaluated in a C-DOF from its start-up. To evaluate HRQOL, an ad hoc survey adapted from the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire of the adult population was designed.

RESULTS

103 patients were evaluated, 85.4% presenting some neurological disease. A videofluoroscopic study was performed in 51 patients (49.5%), reporting combined alterations in both the oral and pharyngeal phases in 64.7% of them. There was a directly proportional correlation between the severity of the DOF and the presence of aspirations, as well as with the patient's motor impairment. Regarding the anthropometric evaluation, there was a trend toward improvement in weight z-score (+0.14 SD), height (+0.17 SD) and BMI (+0.16 SD). Out of 46.2% of the caregivers reported that the DOF problem interfered negatively in the basic activities of daily life. The increase in HRQOL, after the evaluation in the monographic DOF clinic, was statistically significant overall.

CONCLUSIONS

The monographic DOF clinic provided specialized care, impacting positively at the nutritional status of patients, as well as perceived changes in HRQOL, with a probable impact on caregivers.

Predicting penetration-aspiration through quantitative swallow measures of children: a videofluoroscopic study

PURPOSE

Quantitative measures have improved the reliability and accuracy in interpretation and reporting of videofluoroscopy (VFSS). Associations between quantitative VFSS measures and swallow safety in children are not widely reported. The ability to predict aspiration in children, even if not observed during brief VFSS, will improve diagnostic reporting and potentially reduce the need for extended radiation time. The aims of this study were to determine associations between quantitative fluoroscopic swallow measures and penetration-aspiration and to predict likelihood of penetration-aspiration.

METHODS

We selected videofluoroscopic data of 553 children from a pediatric hospital database for this single-center retrospective observational study. A standard protocol of VFSS administration was used and data were recorded at 30 frames-per-second. A set of quantitative and descriptive swallow measures was obtained using a specialized software with satisfactory inter-rater and intra-rater reliability. Binomial logistic regression with backward likelihood ratio was conducted, while controlling for age, gender, and etiology.

RESULTS

We found bolus clearance ratio (BCR), pharyngeal constriction ratio (PCR), duration to hyoid maximal elevation (Hdur), and total pharyngeal transit time (TPT) to be predictive of penetration-aspiration in children. PCR was the most predictive of penetration-aspiration in children (61.5%). Risk of aspiration was more than 100 times, when BCR =  ≥ 0.1, TPT =  ≥ 2 s, Hdur =  > 1 s or PCR =  ≥ 0.2 (p < 0.05 for all measures).

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the potential of objective quantitative swallow measures in predicting the risk of aspiration in children with dysphagia. These parameters provide predictive measures of aspiration risk that are clinically useful in identifying children of concern, even if no aspiration is observed during VFSS.

Aspects of the assessment and management of pharyngoesophageal dysphagia

Swallowing complaints are common and may have significant consequences for nutrition and pulmonary health. Etiology varies and different aspects of the deglutitive system may be affected. A thorough assessment from the oral cavity to the stomach will provide physiologic information that enables specific targeted management plans to be devised. Although the swallow trajectory bridges anatomic areas, there has previously been a tendency to compartmentalize assessment and treatment by arbitrary anatomic boundaries. It is now clear that this approach fails to appreciate the complexity of swallow mechanics and that systems (oral, pharyngeal, esophageal, and pulmonary) are intertwined and codependent. Swallowing specialists from different backgrounds and with complementary skill sets form a multidisciplinary team that can provide insight and address multiple areas of management. With the advent of new tools for instrumental evaluation, such as manometry, targeted rehabilitative strategies can be informed by physiology, increased in precision and breadth, and assessed quantitatively. Surgical approaches have evolved toward endoscopic techniques, and food technology is expanding options in dietary management. The multidisciplinary team is core to managing this varied and often neglected patient population. This review is for clinicians treating swallowing disorders and will explore the selected aspects of the assessment and management of pharyngoesophageal swallowing disorders.