Anatomic wide hepatectomy for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Oncological outcomes of anatomic versus non-anatomic resections for small hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-score matched studies

Background

Primary liver cancer is the second-most commonly occurring cancer and has resulted in numerous deaths worldwide. Hepatic resection is of two main types, i.e., anatomic resection (AR) and non-anatomic resection (NAR). The oncological outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after AR and NAR are still considered controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the impact of AR and NAR on the oncological outcomes of HCC patients with tumor diameters ≤ 5 cm using the propensity score matching method and research-based evidence.

Method

A systematic literature search was conducted. The main outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), intrahepatic recurrence rate, and extrahepatic metastasis rate. Relative risk (RR) was calculated from forest plots and outcomes using random-effects model (REM).

Result

AR significantly improved DFS at 1, 3. and 5 years after surgery, compared to NAR (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 1.04–1.15, P = 0.0003; RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07–1.27, P = 0.0005; RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.07–1.55, P = 0.008). However, both of the difference in DFS at 7 years and OS at 1 and 3 years after AR versus that after NAR were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the long-term OS associated with AR (5, 7, and 10 years) was superior to that associated with NAR (RR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.03–1.21, P = 0.01; RR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.04–1.36, P = 0.01; RR = 1.18, 95% CI = 1.05–1.34, P = 0.008). The difference in the intrahepatic recurrence rate after AR versus that after NAR was not statistically significant, but the extrahepatic metastasis rate after AR was significantly lower than that observed after NAR (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.40–0.94, P = 0.03).

Conclusion

Therefore, AR should be the preferred surgical approach for HCC patients with tumor diameters ≤ 5 cm.

Trial registration

PROSPERO registration number CRD42022330596.

The Clinical Efficacy of Surgical Removal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Caudate Lobe in the Chinese Population: A Case-control Study

Our aims were to compare the therapeutic efficacy of surgical resection of caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma and noncaudal lobe hepatocellular carcinoma in the Chinese population. The study group consisted of 220 patients undergoing caudate lobe hepatectomy during the period spanning from January 2003 to November 2017, and 220 patients with caudate lobe hepatectomy were selected as the control group. There were 142 cases (64.5%) of surgical margin of R0 in patients with caudate lobe liver cancer, and 178 cases (80.9%) of surgical margins in patients with noncaudal lobe liver cancer, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.01) between the 2 groups. Compared with noncaudal lobe liver cancer patients, caudate lobe liver cancer patients had significantly longer operation time (186.65±81.36 vs. 118.85±69.23, P<0.01), longer vessel block time (29.93±11.96 vs. 22.76±10.74, P<0.01), more intraoperative blood loss (709.73±108.39 vs. 329.74±85.76, P<0.01), and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications (53.4% vs. 46.6%, P>0.05). Significantly different therapeutic efficacy was found between the caudate lobe hepatocellular carcinoma group and the noncaudal lobe hepatocellular carcinoma group, which may be due to the lack of resection margin of caudate-leaf liver cancer surgery and more intraoperative bleeding.

A Meta-analysis comparing the effect of anatomical resection vs. non-anatomical resection on the long-term outcomes for patients undergoing hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing anatomical resection (AR) versus non-anatomical resection (NAR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the published comparative studies within the literatures.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of studies published from 2001 to 2010 were conducted using RevMan 5.0. Measured outcomes were morbidity, mortality, recurrence and 5 year overall (OS) and disease free (DFS) survival.

RESULTS

Seventeen observational studies involving 3129 patients were analyzed: 1626 (52%) in AR group and 1503 (48%) in NAR group. The 5-year OS (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.36; P = 0.018) and DFS (RR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.23-1.97; P < 0.001) were significantly greater in the AR group than the NAR group, while the overall recurrence was significantly lower (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80-1.25; P = 0.980) or morbidity (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.48-1.99; P = 0.943) between the AR and NAR groups.

CONCLUSION

AR for HCC is superior to NAR considering its higher 5-year OS and DFS rates and lower overall recurrence rate. Heterogeneity detection within the analysis suggests these results should be interpreted with caution and further well designed studies are required to address this issue.

Recurrence of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage A Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system is widely used to classify hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was performed to investigate the prognostic factors for patients with BCLC stage A HCC after R0 hepatectomy.

METHODS

A total of 592 patients with BCLC stage A HCC following R0 hepatectomy from 1997-2012 were enrolled in this study. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to analyze the risk factors associated with recurrence. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to establish a new scoring system to evaluate the independent risk factors for recurrence. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate surgical margins on tumor recurrence between the anatomic and nonanatomic resection group.

RESULTS

Independent risk factors for BCLC stage A HCC recurrence were preoperative alanine transaminase >40U/L, liver cirrhosis, surgical margin <5mm, nonanatomic resection and maximum tumor diameter >5cm. Based on these 5 risk factors, we established a new scoring system, named "HCC recurrence scoring system." Patients with a high score (≥3 points, 1 point for each factor) composed the high recurrence risk group. Moreover, the subgroup analyses demonstrated that different surgical margins had no significant effect on tumor recurrence in the anatomic resection group (P = 0.408), while it had a significant effect in the nonanatomic resection group (P = 0.000).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with BCLC stage A with scores ≥3 points, close postoperative follow-up and positive measures to prevent recurrence are particularly important. Anatomic resection is preferred for patients with BCLC stage A. Adequate surgical margins are necessary for patients with poor liver function.

Reappraisal of evidence of microscopic portal vein involvement by hepatocellular carcinoma cells with stratification of tumor size

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death internationally, it is necessary to reappraise evidences of HCC cells involving the portal vein, especially considering tumor size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Histopathological evidence and dynamic evidences of radiology and cytology from publication were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Frequencies of microscopic portal vein involvement (MPVI) and microscopic intrahepatic metastasis (MIM) in resected specimens with single nodule HCC were lower than that of multi nodule HCC, although not significantly. Early HCC (≤1.5 cm) was with extremely low to 0 frequencies of MPVI and MIM. HCC >5 cm showed a tendency of flowing HCC cells into portal vein, which was coincident with significantly high frequency (64.1 %) of MPVI for HCC >5 cm. There were no significant difference of frequencies of MPVI and MIM between groups of tumor ≤2, ≤3, and ≤5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Single nodule HCC >5 cm needs anatomic resection and the root of portal vein should be firstly ligated because of tendency of flowing HCC cells into portal vein. For single nodule HCC ≤2 cm, there was a risk of about 16.2 % of MPVI, and a risk of about 16.2-26.4 % of MPVI for those single nodule HCC ≤5 cm, however, there was a risk of extremely low to 0 of MPVI for early HCC (≤1.5 cm). Surgeons have to balance liver reserve and risk of MPVI for HCC ≤5 cm before deciding anatomic or nonanatomic resection.

Clinical analysis of anatomical resection for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma based on the stratification of liver function

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the efficacy of anatomical resection (AR) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with that of nonanatomical resection (NAR) based on the stratification of liver function (LF).

METHODS

The clinical records of 174 patients with a single HCC, 2-5 cm in diameter and without macroscopic vascular invasion, were analyzed. AR was performed in 132 patients and NAR was performed in 42 patients. The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICGR15) of the 78 patients classified as the good-LF group was 10-20 % and the ICGR15 of the 54 patients classified as the poor-LF group was 20-40 %.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival rates of the 174 patients were 67.6 and 33.4 %, respectively. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified ICGR15 ≥ 20 %, liver cirrhosis, α-fetoprotein ≥ 100 mg/dL, and infiltrating growth as independent prognostic factors. Liver cirrhosis was significantly less frequent in patients who underwent AR than in patients who underwent NAR (52 vs. 79 %, p = 0.002). In the subgroup analysis of the good-LF group, there were no significant differences in 5-year OS after AR and NAR (73.3 vs. 65.2 %, p = 0.857). By contrast, in the subgroup analysis of the poor-LF group, the 5-year OS after AR was significantly worse than after NAR (45.3 vs. 77.4 %, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

In patients with an ICGR15 ≥ 20 %, we recommend NAR rather than AR for the treatment of a solitary 2-5-cm-diameter HCC and without macroscopic vascular invasion.

Regular versus irregular liver resection for malignant tumors of the liver

AIM: To compare the clinical effects of regular versus irregular liver resection for malignant tumors of the liver.

METHODS: Clinical data for 120 patients who underwent liver resection for malignant tumors of the liver at our hospital from January 2010 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS: The amount of bleeding, the incidence of complications and mortality, and the length of hospital stay showed no significant differences (all P > 0.05) between patients undergoing irregular liver resection and those undergoing regular liver resection. The operative time was significantly longer in the regular liver resection group than in the irregular liver resection group (221.8 min ± 101.7 min vs 211.3 min ± 102.6 min, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: The aesthetic effect of regular liver resection is better than that of irregular liver resection. For patients with small tumors, irregular liver resection is more simple and effective and can achieve radical results. For those patients with cirrhosis, regular liver resection has higher safety. Liver resection strategy should be selected based on the patient's condition to improve effectiveness and safety.

Alternative management of anatomical right hemihepatectomy using ligation of inflow and outflow vessels without hilus dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The conventional method of anatomical right hemihepatectomy (ARHH) requires hilus dissection. We report a method without hilus dissection to minimize intraoperative bleeding.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data of 107 patients who received ARHH involving ligation of corresponding inflow and outflow vessels (LCIOV) without hilus dissection between January 2000 and October 2008. Results were compared to those of patients who underwent non-anatomical right hemihepatectomies (NARHH).

RESULTS

The two groups had similar gender and age (both, P>0.05). The LCIOV group had a higher percentage of patients without intrahepatic metastases (94.6% vs 80.3%, P=0.003). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesion size (9.3 vs 10.2, P=0.023), durations of inferior vena cava occlusion (4 vs 4.7, P<0.001) and portal triad occlusion (7 vs 11, P<0.001), blood loss (430 vs 580 mL, P=0.001), transfusion volume (300 vs 520 mL, P<0.001), and measures of postoperative liver function (e.g. maximum aspartate aminotransferase [AST]) of the LCIOV group were also significantly less than the NARHH group. Larger hepatic cavernous hemangiomas (HCH) lesion size (16.2 vs 13.0, P<0.001), longer operative time (168 vs 154 min, P=0.017), and a lower percentage of patients with inferior vena cava occlusion (17.8% vs 35.2%, P=0.001), pleural effusions (19.3% vs 30.9%, P=0.042), and blood transfusions (10.3% vs 75.0%, P<0.001) were found in the LCIOV group.

CONCLUSION

The reported method is a safe and bloodless technique for right hemihepatectomy in select patients.

Appropriate liver resection type for patients with the American joint committee on cancer classification T1 and T2 hepatocellular carcinoma

SYNOPSIS

Major liver resection prevents intrahepatic tumor recurrence in T2 hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion or daughter nodules.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is no consensus on whether major or minor hepatectomy is better for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We investigated the outcomes of liver resection type in resectable HCC patients.

METHODS

Two hundred sixty-three HCC patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function who underwent curative hepatectomy were enrolled. Among them, 186 patients had pathologic stage T1 HCC and 77 had stage T2 HCC. Patients were also classed according to the type of resection (major or minor). Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Patients with T1 HCC who underwent major resection had a higher rate of blood transfusion than those who underwent minor resection (P < 0.001). The disease-free survival rate of T2 patients who underwent major resection was better than that of patients who underwent minor resection (P = 0.004). The overall survival rates of T1 and T2 HCC patients did not differ significantly between those with major or minor resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Major liver resection is recommended for T2 HCC patients with adequate remnant liver function because it results in a better disease-free survival rate than does minor resection in these patients. Minor liver resection is suggested for T1 HCC patients, except for those with a tumor sitting close to vessels, because it is associated with a low incidence of blood transfusion and a good survival rate.

Ramification of Glisson's sheath peripheral branches and clinical implications in the era of local ablation therapy

PURPOSE

Classical anatomical resection does not always guarantee tumor-free margins when the tumor overrides traditional anatomical planes. Surgeons and interventionists frequently need to focus on the peripheral branches of Glisson's sheath in patients with poor hepatic reserves, particularly when the tumor is deep seated. The present study used anatomical liver dissection to investigate the spatial distribution of the branches of Glisson's sheath in each of four liver sectors.

METHODS

Sixty-four adult human liver specimens were dissected. The size and ramification patterns of Glisson's sheath in each sector were analyzed in terms of bilateral homology within two paramedian sectors and within two lateral sectors.

RESULTS

Each liver sector had a characteristic Glisson's sheath in terms of trunk shape and ramification pattern. The two paramedian sectors showed point symmetry. Most of the branches of the two paramedian sectors emerged from the top of a short stout trunk. Although the two paramedian sectors were similar in terms of basic configuration, the ramification axes were almost perpendicular to each other. Unlike the paramedian sectors, the two lateral sectors showed not much homology.

CONCLUSIONS

The peripheral branches of Glisson's sheath were generally longer (approximately 5 cm) and thicker than anticipated. Extirpation strategies should take into account that each liver sector has a characteristic Glisson's sheath ramification pattern.