1
|
Balduzzi A, van Hilst J, Korrel M, Lof S, Al-Sarireh B, Alseidi A, Berrevoet F, Björnsson B, van den Boezem P, Boggi U, Busch OR, Butturini G, Casadei R, van Dam R, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Sahakyan MA, Ercolani G, Fabre JM, Falconi M, Forgione A, Gayet B, Gomez D, Koerkamp BG, Hackert T, Keck T, Khatkov I, Krautz C, Marudanayagam R, Menon K, Pietrabissa A, Poves I, Cunha AS, Salvia R, Sánchez-Cabús S, Soonawalla Z, Hilal MA, Besselink MG. Laparoscopic versus open extended radical left pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an international propensity-score matched study. Surg Endosc 2021; 35:6949-6959. [PMID: 33398565 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08206-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A radical left pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may require extended, multivisceral resections. The role of a laparoscopic approach in extended radical left pancreatectomy (ERLP) is unclear since comparative studies are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after laparoscopic vs open ERLP in patients with PDAC. METHODS An international multicenter propensity-score matched study including patients who underwent either laparoscopic or open ERLP (L-ERLP; O-ERLP) for PDAC was performed (2007-2015). The ISGPS definition for extended resection was used. Primary outcomes were overall survival, margin negative rate (R0), and lymph node retrieval. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2015, 320 patients underwent ERLP in 34 centers from 12 countries (65 L-ERLP vs. 255 O-ERLP). After propensity-score matching, 44 L-ERLP could be matched to 44 O-ERLP. In the matched cohort, the conversion rate in L-ERLP group was 35%. The L-ERLP R0 resection rate (matched cohort) was comparable to O-ERLP (67% vs 48%; P = 0.063) but the lymph node yield was lower for L-ERLP than O-ERLP (median 11 vs 19, P = 0.023). L-ERLP was associated with less delayed gastric emptying (0% vs 16%, P = 0.006) and shorter hospital stay (median 9 vs 13 days, P = 0.005), as compared to O-ERLP. Outcomes were comparable for additional organ resections, vascular resections (besides splenic vessels), Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications, or 90-day mortality (2% vs 2%, P = 0.973). The median overall survival was comparable between both groups (19 vs 20 months, P = 0.571). Conversion did not worsen outcomes in L-ERLP. CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach may be used safely in selected patients requiring ERLP for PDAC, since morbidity, mortality, and overall survival seem comparable, as compared to O-ERLP. L-ERLP is associated with a high conversion rate and reduced lymph node yield but also with less delayed gastric emptying and a shorter hospital stay, as compared to O-ERLP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Balduzzi
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
| | - J van Hilst
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Korrel
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Lof
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - B Al-Sarireh
- Department of Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK
| | - A Alseidi
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - F Berrevoet
- Department of General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - P van den Boezem
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - U Boggi
- Department of Surgery, Universitá di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - O R Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Butturini
- Department of Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera, Italy
| | - R Casadei
- Department of Surgery, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - R van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - S Dokmak
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - B Edwin
- Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - M A Sahakyan
- Department of Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - G Ercolani
- Department of General Surgery and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, AUSL Romagna Forlì, Forlì, Italy.,Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J M Fabre
- Department of Surgery, Hopital Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France
| | - M Falconi
- San Raffaele Hospital Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, San Raffaele Hospital, Università Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy
| | - A Forgione
- Department of Surgery, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - D Gomez
- Department of Surgery, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - T Hackert
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Keck
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein UKSH Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - I Khatkov
- Department of Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - C Krautz
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Marudanayagam
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K Menon
- Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Pietrabissa
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - I Poves
- Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Sa Cunha
- Department of Surgery, Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - R Salvia
- General and Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - S Sánchez-Cabús
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Z Soonawalla
- Department of Surgery, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. .,Department of General Surgery, Istituto Ospedaliero Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. .,HPB and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Southampton University, Southampton, UK.
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef, 91100 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hobeika C, Fuks D, Cauchy F, Goumard C, Soubrane O, Gayet B, Salamé E, Cherqui D, Vibert E, Scatton O, Nomi T, Oudafal N, Kawai T, Komatsu S, Okumura S, Petrucciani N, Laurent A, Bucur P, Barbier L, Trechot B, Nunèz J, Tedeschi M, Allard MA, Golse N, Ciacio O, Pittau G, Cunha AS, Adam R, Laurent C, Chiche L, Leourier P, Rebibo L, Regimbeau JM, Ferre L, Souche FR, Chauvat J, Fabre JM, Jehaes F, Mohkam K, Lesurtel M, Ducerf C, Mabrut JY, Hor T, Paye F, Balladur P, Suc B, Muscari F, Millet G, El Amrani M, Ratajczak C, Lecolle K, Boleslawski E, Truant S, Pruvot FR, Kianmanesh AR, Codjia T, Schwarz L, Girard E, Abba J, Letoublon C, Chirica M, Carmelo A, VanBrugghe C, Cherkaoui Z, Unterteiner X, Memeo R, Pessaux P, Buc E, Lermite E, Barbieux J, Bougard M, Marchese U, Ewald J, Turini O, Thobie A, Menahem B, Mulliri A, Lubrano J, Zemour J, Fagot H, Passot G, Gregoire E, Hardwigsen J, le Treut YP, Patrice D. Impact of cirrhosis in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection in a nationwide multicentre survey. Br J Surg 2020; 107:268-277. [PMID: 31916594 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Revised: 09/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim was to analyse the impact of cirrhosis on short-term outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) in a multicentre national cohort study. METHODS This retrospective study included all patients undergoing LLR in 27 centres between 2000 and 2017. Cirrhosis was defined as F4 fibrosis on pathological examination. Short-term outcomes of patients with and without liver cirrhosis were compared after propensity score matching by centre volume, demographic and tumour characteristics, and extent of resection. RESULTS Among 3150 patients included, LLR was performed in 774 patients with (24·6 per cent) and 2376 (75·4 per cent) without cirrhosis. Severe complication and mortality rates in patients with cirrhosis were 10·6 and 2·6 per cent respectively. Posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) developed in 3·6 per cent of patients with cirrhosis and was the major cause of death (11 of 20 patients). After matching, patients with cirrhosis tended to have higher rates of severe complications (odds ratio (OR) 1·74, 95 per cent c.i. 0·92 to 3·41; P = 0·096) and PHLF (OR 7·13, 0·91 to 323·10; P = 0·068) than those without cirrhosis. They also had a higher risk of death (OR 5·13, 1·08 to 48·61; P = 0·039). Rates of cardiorespiratory complications (P = 0·338), bile leakage (P = 0·286) and reoperation (P = 0·352) were similar in the two groups. Patients with cirrhosis had a longer hospital stay than those without (11 versus 8 days; P = 0·018). Centre expertise was an independent protective factor against PHLF in patients with cirrhosis (OR 0·33, 0·14 to 0·76; P = 0·010). CONCLUSION Underlying cirrhosis remains an independent risk factor for impaired outcomes in patients undergoing LLR, even in expert centres.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hobeika
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Scientifique Saint Antoine, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - F Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - C Goumard
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Scientifique Saint Antoine, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - O Soubrane
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - E Salamé
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Trousseau University Hospital, Tours University, Tours, France
| | - D Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - E Vibert
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France
| | - O Scatton
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche Scientifique Saint Antoine, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | | | - T Nomi
- Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - N Oudafal
- Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - T Kawai
- Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - S Komatsu
- Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | - S Okumura
- Pitié Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France
| | | | - A Laurent
- Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - P Bucur
- Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital Centre of Tours, Tours, France
| | - L Barbier
- Trousseau Hospital, University Hospital Centre of Tours, Tours, France
| | - B Trechot
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - J Nunèz
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - M Tedeschi
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - M-A Allard
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - N Golse
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - O Ciacio
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - G Pittau
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - A Sa Cunha
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - R Adam
- Centre Hépato-biliaire de Paul Brousse, APHP, Villejuif, France
| | - C Laurent
- Hospital University Centre of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - L Chiche
- Hospital University Centre of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - P Leourier
- Hospital University Centre of Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - L Rebibo
- Hospital University Centre of Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - J-M Regimbeau
- Hospital University Centre of Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - L Ferre
- Saint Eloi Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - F R Souche
- Saint Eloi Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - J Chauvat
- Saint Eloi Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - J-M Fabre
- Saint Eloi Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - F Jehaes
- Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - K Mohkam
- Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - M Lesurtel
- Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - C Ducerf
- Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - J-Y Mabrut
- Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - T Hor
- St Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - F Paye
- St Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - P Balladur
- St Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - B Suc
- Rangueil Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - F Muscari
- Rangueil Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - G Millet
- Claude Huriez Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Lille, Lille, France
| | - M El Amrani
- Claude Huriez Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Lille, Lille, France
| | - C Ratajczak
- Claude Huriez Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Lille, Lille, France
| | - K Lecolle
- Claude Huriez Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Lille, Lille, France
| | - E Boleslawski
- Claude Huriez Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Lille, Lille, France
| | - S Truant
- Claude Huriez Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Lille, Lille, France
| | - F-R Pruvot
- Claude Huriez Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Lille, Lille, France
| | - A-R Kianmanesh
- Robert Debré Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Reims, Reims, France
| | - T Codjia
- Charles Nicolle Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - L Schwarz
- Charles Nicolle Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - E Girard
- Michalon Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Grenoble, Grebnoble, France
| | - J Abba
- Michalon Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Grenoble, Grebnoble, France
| | - C Letoublon
- Michalon Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Grenoble, Grebnoble, France
| | - M Chirica
- Michalon Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Grenoble, Grebnoble, France
| | | | | | - Z Cherkaoui
- Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hospital University Centre of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - X Unterteiner
- Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hospital University Centre of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - R Memeo
- Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hospital University Centre of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - P Pessaux
- Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hospital University Centre of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - E Buc
- Hospital University Centre of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - E Lermite
- Hospital University Centre of Angers, Angers, France
| | - J Barbieux
- Hospital University Centre of Angers, Angers, France
| | - M Bougard
- Hospital University Centre of Angers, Angers, France
| | - U Marchese
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - J Ewald
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - O Turini
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Thobie
- Hospital University Centre of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - B Menahem
- Hospital University Centre of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - A Mulliri
- Hospital University Centre of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - J Lubrano
- Hospital University Centre of Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - J Zemour
- Hospital University Centre of Saint-Pierre, Saint Pierre, Department of Réunion, France
| | - H Fagot
- Hospital University Centre of Saint-Pierre, Saint Pierre, Department of Réunion, France
| | - G Passot
- Hospital University Centre of Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | - E Gregoire
- La Timone Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - J Hardwigsen
- La Timone Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Y-P le Treut
- La Timone Hospital, Hospital University Centre of Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - D Patrice
- Louis Pasteur Hospital, Colmar, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cervantes B, Gayet B, Frosio F, Tabchouri N, Bennamoun M, Alexandra N, Louvet C, Fuks D. The smallest colorectal liver metastasis size as a prognosis factor after laparoscopic liver resection. Ann Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz246.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
4
|
Abstract
The liver is the most common site for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRLM). Despite advances in oncologic treatment, resection of metastases is still the only curative option. Although laparoscopic surgery for primary colorectal cancer is well documented and widely used, laparoscopic surgery for liver metastases has developed more slowly. However, in spite of some difficulties, laparoscopic approach demonstrated strong advantages including minimal parietal damage, decreased morbidity (reduced blood loss and need for transfusion, fewer pulmonary complications), and simplification of subsequent iterative hepatectomy. Up to now, more than 9 000 laparoscopic procedures have been reported worldwide and long-term results in colorectal liver metastases seem comparable to the open approach. Only one recent randomized controlled trial has compared the laparoscopic and the open approach. The purpose of the present update was to identify the barriers limiting widespread acceptance of laparoscopic approach, the benefits and the limits of laparoscopic hepatectomies in CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Guilbaud
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 15, rue de l'école de médecine, 75005 Paris, France.
| | - U Marchese
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 15, rue de l'école de médecine, 75005 Paris, France
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 15, rue de l'école de médecine, 75005 Paris, France
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncological and Metabolic Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, 15, rue de l'école de médecine, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Poel MJ, Barkhatov L, Fuks D, Berardi G, Cipriani F, Aljaiuossi A, Lainas P, Dagher I, D'Hondt M, Rotellar F, Besselink MG, Aldrighetti L, Troisi RI, Gayet B, Edwin B, Abu Hilal M. Multicentre propensity score-matched study of laparoscopic versus open repeat liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2019; 106:783-789. [PMID: 30706451 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Repeat liver resection is often the best treatment option for patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Repeat resections can be complex, however, owing to adhesions and altered liver anatomy. It remains uncertain whether the advantages of a laparoscopic approach are upheld in this setting. The aim of this retrospective, propensity score-matched study was to compare the short-term outcome of laparoscopic (LRLR) and open (ORLR) repeat liver resection. METHODS A multicentre retrospective propensity score-matched study was performed including all patients who underwent LRLRs and ORLRs for CRLM performed in nine high-volume centres from seven European countries between 2000 and 2016. Patients were matched based on propensity scores in a 1 : 1 ratio. Propensity scores were calculated based on 12 preoperative variables, including the approach to, and extent of, the previous liver resection. Operative outcomes were compared using paired tests. RESULTS Overall, 425 repeat liver resections were included. Of 271 LRLRs, 105 were matched with an ORLR. Baseline characteristics were comparable after matching. LRLR was associated with a shorter duration of operation (median 200 (i.q.r. 123-273) versus 256 (199-320) min; P < 0·001), less intraoperative blood loss (200 (50-450) versus 300 (100-600) ml; P = 0·077) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (5 (3-8) versus 6 (5-8) days; P = 0·028). Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar after LRLR and ORLR. CONCLUSION LRLR for CRLM is feasible in selected patients and may offer advantages over an open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J van der Poel
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L Barkhatov
- Interventional Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - G Berardi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - F Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Aljaiuossi
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - P Lainas
- Department of Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France
| | - I Dagher
- Department of Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - F Rotellar
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - M G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - R I Troisi
- Department of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - B Edwin
- Interventional Centre and Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rod X, Fuks D, Macovei R, Levard H, Ferraz JM, Denet C, Tubbax C, Gayet B, Perniceni T. Comparison between open and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A monocentric retrospective study from a western country. J Visc Surg 2018; 155:91-97. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
|
7
|
Lainas P, Fuks D, Gaujoux S, Machroub Z, Fregeville A, Perniceni T, Mal F, Dousset B, Gayet B. Preoperative imaging and prediction of oesophageal conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 2017; 104:1346-1354. [PMID: 28493483 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Revised: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 03/07/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oesophageal conduit necrosis following oesophagectomy is a rare but life-threatening complication. The present study aimed to assess the impact of coeliac axis stenosis on outcomes after oesophagectomy for cancer. METHODS The study included consecutive patients who had an Ivor Lewis procedure with curative intent for middle- and lower-third oesophageal cancer at two tertiary referral centres. All patients underwent preoperative multidetector CT with arterial phase to detect coeliac axis stenosis. The coeliac artery was classified as normal, with extrinsic stenosis due to a median arcuate ligament or with intrinsic stenosis caused by atherosclerosis. RESULTS Some 481 patients underwent an Ivor Lewis procedure. Of these, ten (2·1 per cent) developed oesophageal conduit necrosis after surgery. Coeliac artery evaluation revealed a completely normal artery in 431 patients (91·5 per cent) in the group without conduit necrosis and in one (10 per cent) with necrosis (P < 0·001). Extrinsic stenosis of the coeliac artery due to a median arcuate ligament was found in two patients (0·4 per cent) without conduit necrosis and five (50 per cent) with necrosis (P < 0·001). Intrinsic stenosis of the coeliac artery was found in 11 (2·3 per cent) and eight (80 per cent) patients respectively (P < 0·001). Eight patients without (1·7 per cent) and five (50 per cent) with conduit necrosis had a single and thin left gastric artery (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION This study suggests that oesophageal conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy for cancer may be due to pre-existing coeliac axis stenosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Lainas
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.,Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - S Gaujoux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Z Machroub
- Intensive Care Unit, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - A Fregeville
- Department of Radiology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - T Perniceni
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - F Mal
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - B Dousset
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.,Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.,Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bekkar S, Gronnier C, Renaud F, Duhamel A, Pasquer A, Théreaux J, Gagnière J, Meunier B, Collet D, Mariette C, Dhahri A, Lignier D, Cossé C, Regimbeau JM, Luc G, Cabau M, Jougon J, Badic B, Lozach P, Bail JP, Cappeliez S, El Nakadi I, Lebreton G, Alves A, Flamein R, Pezet D, Pipitone F, Stan-Iuga B, Contival N, Pappalardo E, Coueffe X, Msika S, Mantziari S, Demartines N, Hec F, Vanderbeken M, Tessier W, Briez N, Fredon F, Gainant A, Mathonnet M, Bigourdan JM, Mezoughi S, Ducerf C, Baulieux J, Mabrut JY, Bigourdan JM, Baraket O, Poncet G, Adam M, Vaudoyer D, Jourdan Enfer P, Villeneuve L, Glehen O, Coste T, Fabre JM, Marchal F, Frisoni R, Ayav A, Brunaud L, Bresler L, Cohen C, Aze O, Venissac N, Pop D, Mouroux J, Donici I, Prudhomme M, Felli E, Lisunfui S, Seman M, Godiris Petit G, Karoui M, Tresallet C, Ménégaux F, Vaillant JC, Hannoun L, Malgras B, Lantuas D, Pautrat K, Pocard M, Valleur P, Lefevre JH, Chafai N, Balladur P, Lefrançois M, Parc Y, Paye F, Tiret E, Nedelcu M, Laface L, Perniceni T, Gayet B, Turner K, Filipello A, Porcheron J, Tiffet O, Kamlet N, Chemaly R, Klipfel A, Pessaux P, Brigand C, Rohr S, Carrère N, Da Re C, Dumont F, Goéré D, Elias D, Bertrand C. Multicentre study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage I and II oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2016; 103:855-62. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Revised: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) for early-stage oesophageal cancer is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether NCT improves the outcome of patients with stage I or II disease.
Methods
Data were collected from 30 European centres from 2000 to 2010. Patients who received NCT for stage I or II oesophageal cancer were compared with patients who underwent primary surgery with regard to postoperative morbidity, mortality, and overall and disease-free survival. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics.
Results
Of 1173 patients recruited (181 NCT, 992 primary surgery), 651 (55·5 per cent) had clinical stage I disease and 522 (44·5 per cent) had stage II disease. Comparisons of the NCT and primary surgery groups in the matched population (181 patients in each group) revealed in-hospital mortality rates of 4·4 and 5·5 per cent respectively (P = 0·660), R0 resection rates of 91·7 and 86·7 per cent (P = 0·338), 5-year overall survival rates of 47·7 and 38·6 per cent (hazard ratio (HR) 0·68, 95 per cent c.i. 0·49 to 0·93; P = 0·016), and 5-year disease-free survival rates of 44·9 and 36·1 per cent (HR 0·68, 0·50 to 0·93; P = 0·017).
Conclusion
NCT was associated with better overall and disease-free survival in patients with stage I or II oesophageal cancer, without increasing postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bekkar
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - C Gronnier
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
- North of France University, Lille, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S1172, Team 5 ‘Mucins, epithelial differentiation and carcinogenesis’, Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Centre, Lille, France
| | - F Renaud
- Department of Pathology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - A Duhamel
- Department of Biostatistics, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
- Site de Recherche Intégré en Cancérologie OncoLille, Lille, France
| | - A Pasquer
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - J Théreaux
- Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - J Gagnière
- Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - B Meunier
- Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - D Collet
- Haut-Levêque University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - C Mariette
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
- North of France University, Lille, France
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S1172, Team 5 ‘Mucins, epithelial differentiation and carcinogenesis’, Jean-Pierre Aubert Research Centre, Lille, France
- Site de Recherche Intégré en Cancérologie OncoLille, Lille, France
| | - A Dhahri
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens Unievrsity Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - D Lignier
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens Unievrsity Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - C Cossé
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens Unievrsity Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - J-M Regimbeau
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Amiens Unievrsity Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - G Luc
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pessac University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Cabau
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Pessac University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - J Jougon
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Pessac University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - B Badic
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - P Lozach
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - J P Bail
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Cavale Blanche University Hospital, Brest, France
| | - S Cappeliez
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Brussel ULB Erasme Bordet University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - I El Nakadi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Brussel ULB Erasme Bordet University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - G Lebreton
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France
| | - A Alves
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France
| | - R Flamein
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - D Pezet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Estaing University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - F Pipitone
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France
| | - B Stan-Iuga
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France
| | - N Contival
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France
| | - E Pappalardo
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France
| | - X Coueffe
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France
| | - S Msika
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Louis Mourier University Hospital, Colombes, France
| | - S Mantziari
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N Demartines
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - F Hec
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - M Vanderbeken
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - W Tessier
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - N Briez
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Caude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - F Fredon
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - A Gainant
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - M Mathonnet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - J M Bigourdan
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - S Mezoughi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - C Ducerf
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - J Baulieux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - J-Y Mabrut
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - J M Bigourdan
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - O Baraket
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - G Poncet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - M Adam
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Edouard Herriot University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - D Vaudoyer
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - P Jourdan Enfer
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - L Villeneuve
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - O Glehen
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - T Coste
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Montpellier, France
| | - J-M Fabre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Montpellier, France
| | - F Marchal
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - R Frisoni
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - A Ayav
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - L Brunaud
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - L Bresler
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | - C Cohen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - O Aze
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - N Venissac
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - D Pop
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - J Mouroux
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
| | - I Donici
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
| | - M Prudhomme
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nîmes University Hospital, Nîmes, France
| | - E Felli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - S Lisunfui
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Seman
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - G Godiris Petit
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Karoui
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - C Tresallet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - F Ménégaux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - J-C Vaillant
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - L Hannoun
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Pitié-Salpétrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - B Malgras
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - D Lantuas
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - K Pautrat
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Pocard
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P Valleur
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - J H Lefevre
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - N Chafai
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - P Balladur
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Lefrançois
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Y Parc
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - F Paye
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - E Tiret
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M Nedelcu
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - L Laface
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - T Perniceni
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - K Turner
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rennes, France
| | - A Filipello
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - J Porcheron
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - O Tiffet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint-Etienne, France
| | - N Kamlet
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - R Chemaly
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - A Klipfel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - P Pessaux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - C Brigand
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - S Rohr
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - N Carrère
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - C Da Re
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - F Dumont
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Goéré
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Elias
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - C Bertrand
- Mont-Godinne University Hospital, Yvoir, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simon M, Mal F, Perniceni T, Ferraz JM, Strauss C, Levard H, Louvet C, Fuks D, Gayet B. Accuracy of staging laparoscopy in detecting peritoneal dissemination in patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Dis Esophagus 2016; 29:236-40. [PMID: 25758761 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Despite staging laparoscopy (SL) with peritoneal lavage is recommended in US Guidelines in patients with potentially resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma, this procedure is not systematically proposed in French Guidelines. Therefore, we decided to analyze the results of systematic SL in patients considered for preoperative chemotherapy. From 2005 to 2011, 116 consecutive patients with distal esophagus, esogastric junction, and gastric adenocarcinoma ≥T3 or N+ without detectable metastatic dissemination by computed tomography (CT) scan imaging underwent SL before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Positive and negative SLs were compared according to tumor characteristics. SL was positive in 15 cases (12.9%) including 14 with peritoneal seeding (localized in five, diffuse in nine). SL was positive in 7 (24.1%) of 29 patients with poorly differentiated tumor, in 9 (32.1%) of 28 patients with signet ring cells, in 7 (50%) of 14 patients with gastric linitis tumor, and in 15 (16.3%) of 92 patients with T3 or T4 tumor. All the lesions of distal esophagus extending to the cardia had a negative SL. Among the 14 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis at SL, nine (65%) had signs of peritoneal seeding on initial CT scan. One (0.8%) patient had a small bowel perforation closed laparoscopically. If systematic SL before preoperative chemotherapy does not seem justified because of its low accuracy, it should be performed in patients with poorly differentiated tumor, signet ring cell, and gastric linitis plastica components on biopsy and when CT scan is suggestive of T4 tumor, ascites, or peritoneal nodule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Simon
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - F Mal
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - T Perniceni
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - J-M Ferraz
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - C Strauss
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - H Levard
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - C Louvet
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - D Fuks
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive Diseases and Department of Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gouda B, Massol J, Fuks D, Gayet B. Minimally-invasive surgery for liver metastases. MINERVA CHIR 2015; 70:429-436. [PMID: 26398066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
The practice of laparoscopic liver surgery has developed gradually, and most liver resections seem currently feasible and safe for selected patients in centers where surgeons are experienced both in liver surgery and in laparoscopic surgery. However, further studies would be required, especially for long-term oncological results and for major hepatectomy follow-up, before laparoscopic hepatectomy becomes a common alternative to open liver surgeries. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy is a recent technique, due to its significant complexity. In this review, we showed that patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy for liver metastases experienced decreased rates of overall and major postoperative complications without any compromise on long-term outcomes compared to patients treated by open resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Gouda
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France -
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fuks D, Nomi T, Ogiso S, Gelli M, Velayutham V, Conrad C, Louvet C, Gayet B. Laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg 2015; 102:1684-90. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2015] [Revised: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 08/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Despite the gradual diffusion of laparoscopic liver resection, the feasibility and results of laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) have not been described frequently. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic TSH for bilobar CRLM.
Methods
All patients eligible for laparoscopic TSH among those treated for bilobar CRLM from 2000 to 2013 were included. Demographics, tumour characteristics, surgical procedures, and short- and long-term outcomes were analysed.
Results
Laparoscopic TSH was planned in 34 patients with bilobar CRLM, representing 17·2 per cent of all 198 patients treated for bilobar CRLM. Thirty patients received preoperative chemotherapy, and 20 had portal vein occlusion to increase the volume of the remnant liver. Laparoscopic resection of the primary colorectal tumour was integrated within the first-stage hepatectomy in 11 patients. After a median interval of 3·1 months, 26 patients subsequently had a successful laparoscopic second-stage hepatectomy, including 18 laparoscopic right or extended right hepatectomies. The mortality rate for both stages was 3 per cent (1 of 34), and the overall morbidity rate for the first and second stages was 50 per cent (17 of 34) and 54 per cent (14 of 26) respectively. Mean length of hospital stay was 6·1 and 9·0 days respectively. With a median follow-up of 37·8 (range 6–129) months, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates in patients who completed TSH were 78 and 41 per cent respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 26 and 13 per cent respectively.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic TSH for bilobar CRLM is safe and does not jeopardize long-term outcomes in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Fuks
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - T Nomi
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | - S Ogiso
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - M Gelli
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - V Velayutham
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - C Conrad
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - C Louvet
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hebbar M, Chibaudel B, André T, Mineur L, Smith D, Louvet C, Dutel J, Ychou M, Legoux J, Mabro M, Faroux R, Auby D, Brusquant D, Khalil A, Truant S, Hadengue A, Dalban C, Gayet B, Paye F, Pruvot F, Bonnetain F, de Gramont A. FOLFOX4 versus sequential dose-dense FOLFOX7 followed by FOLFIRI in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MIROX): a pragmatic approach to chemotherapy timing with perioperative or postoperative chemotherapy from an open-label, randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2015; 26:1040. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
13
|
Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2015; 102:796-804. [PMID: 25873161 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 168] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2014] [Revised: 12/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) is evolving as an important surgical approach in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. The present study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for LMH at a single centre. METHODS Data for all patients undergoing LMH between January 1998 and September 2013 were recorded in a prospective database and analysed. The learning curve for operating time (OT) was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method. RESULTS Of 173 patients undergoing major hepatectomy, left hepatectomy was performed in 28 (16·2 per cent), left trisectionectomy in nine (5·2 per cent), right hepatectomy in 115 (66·5 per cent), right trisectionectomy in 13 (7·5 per cent) and central hepatectomy in eight (4·6 per cent). Median duration of surgery was 270 (range 100-540) min and median blood loss was 300 (10-4500) ml. There were 20 conversions to an open procedure (11·6 per cent). Vascular clamping was independently associated with conversion on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 5·95, 95 per cent c.i. 1·24 to 28·56; P = 0·026). The CUSUMOT learning curve was modelled as a parabola (CUSUMOT = 0·2149 × patient number(2) - 30·586 × patient number - 1118·3; R(2) = 0·7356). The learning curve comprised three phases: phase 1 (45 initial patients), phase 2 (30 intermediate patients) and phase 3 (the subsequent 98 patients). Although right hepatectomy was most common in phase 1, a significant decrease was observed from phase 1 to 3 (P = 0·007) in favour of more complex procedures. CONCLUSION The learning curve for LMH consisted of three characteristic phases identified by CUSUM analysis. The data suggest that the learning phase of LMH included 45 to 75 patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Nomi
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris-Descartes, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cauchy F, Fuks D, Nomi T, Schwarz L, Barbier L, Dokmak S, Scatton O, Belghiti J, Soubrane O, Gayet B. Risk factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic major liver resection. Br J Surg 2015; 102:785-95. [PMID: 25846843 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2014] [Revised: 02/01/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although recent reports have suggested potential benefits of the laparoscopic approach in patients requiring major hepatectomy, it remains unclear whether conversion to open surgery could offset these advantages. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for and postoperative consequences of conversion in patients undergoing laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH). METHODS Data for all patients undergoing LMH between 2000 and 2013 at two tertiary referral centres were reviewed retrospectively. Risk factors for conversion were determined using multivariable analysis. After propensity score matching, the outcomes of patients who underwent conversion were compared with those of matched patients undergoing laparoscopic hepatectomy who did not have conversion, operated on at the same centres, and also with matched patients operated on at another tertiary centre during the same period by an open laparotomy approach. RESULTS Conversion was needed in 30 (13·5 per cent) of the 223 patients undergoing LMH. The most frequent reasons for conversion were bleeding and failure to progress, in 14 (47 per cent) and nine (30 per cent) patients respectively. On multivariable analysis, risk factors for conversion were patient age above 75 years (hazard ratio (HR) 7·72, 95 per cent c.i. 1·67 to 35·70; P = 0·009), diabetes (HR 4·51, 1·16 to 17·57; P = 0·030), body mass index (BMI) above 28 kg/m(2) (HR 6·41, 1·56 to 26·37; P = 0·010), tumour diameter greater than 10 cm (HR 8·91, 1·57 to 50·79; P = 0·014) and biliary reconstruction (HR 13·99, 1·82 to 238·13; P = 0·048). After propensity score matching, the complication rate in patients who had conversion was higher than in patients who did not (75 versus 47·3 per cent respectively; P = 0·038), but was not significantly different from the rate in patients treated by planned laparotomy (79 versus 67·9 per cent respectively; P = 0·438). CONCLUSION Conversion during LMH should be anticipated in patients with raised BMI, large lesions and biliary reconstruction. Conversion does not lead to increased morbidity compared with planned laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Cauchy
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Saint Antoine, Paris, France; Department of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nomi T, Fuks D, Govindasamy M, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Risk factors for complications after laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2014; 102:254-60. [PMID: 25522176 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2014] [Revised: 10/25/2014] [Accepted: 10/29/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic major hepatectomy (MH) is becoming increasingly common in several specialized centres, data regarding outcomes are limited. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications of purely laparoscopic MH at a single centre. METHODS All patients who underwent purely laparoscopic MH between January 1998 and March 2014 at the authors' institution were enrolled. Demographic, clinicopathological and perioperative factors were collected prospectively, and data were analysed retrospectively. The dependent variables studied were the occurrence of overall and major complications (Dindo-Clavien grade III or above). RESULTS A total of 183 patients were enrolled. The types of MH included left-sided hepatectomy in 40 patients (21·9 per cent), right-sided hepatectomy in 135 (73·8 per cent) and central hepatectomy in eight (4·4 per cent). Median duration of surgery was 255 (range 100-540) min, and median blood loss was 280 (10-4500) ml. Complications occurred in 100 patients (54·6 per cent), and the 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 2·7 per cent. Liver-specific and general complications occurred in 62 (33·9 per cent) and 38 (20·8 per cent) patients respectively. Multivariable analysis identified one independent risk factor for global postoperative complications: intraoperative simultaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (odds ratio (OR) 6·93, 95 per cent c.i. 1·49 to 32·14; P = 0·013). There were two independent risk factors for major complications: intraoperative blood transfusion (OR 2·50, 1·01 to 6·23; P = 0·049) and bilobar resection (OR 2·47, 1·00 to 6·06; P = 0·049). CONCLUSION Purely laparoscopic MH is feasible and safe. Simultaneous RFA and bilobar resection should probably be avoided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Nomi
- Department of Digestive Disease, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France; Department of Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hebbar M, Chibaudel B, André T, Mineur L, Smith D, Louvet C, Dutel JL, Ychou M, Legoux JL, Mabro M, Faroux R, Auby D, Brusquant D, Khalil A, Truant S, Hadengue A, Dalban C, Gayet B, Paye F, Pruvot FR, Bonnetain F, Taieb J, Brucker P, Landi B, Flesch M, Carola E, Martin P, Vaillant E, de Gramont A. FOLFOX4 versus sequential dose-dense FOLFOX7 followed by FOLFIRI in patients with resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (MIROX): a pragmatic approach to chemotherapy timing with perioperative or postoperative chemotherapy from an open-label, randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol 2014; 26:340-7. [PMID: 25403578 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) chemotherapy is the current standard in patients with resectable metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to determine whether a sequential chemotherapy with dose-dense oxaliplatin (FOLFOX7) and irinotecan (FOLFIRI; irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) is superior to FOLFOX4. The chemotherapy timing was not imposed, and was perioperative or postoperative. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this open-label, phase III trial, patients with resectable or resected metastases were randomly assigned either to 12 cycles of FOLFOX4 (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2)) or 6 cycles of FOLFOX7 (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)) followed by 6 cycles of FOLFIRI (irinotecan 180 mg/m(2)). Randomization was done centrally, with stratification by chemotherapy timing, type of local treatment (surgery versus radiofrequency ablation with/without surgery), and Fong's prognostic score. The primary end point was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS A total of 284 patients were randomized, 142 in each treatment group. Chemotherapy was perioperative in 168 (59.2%) patients and postoperative in 116 (40.8%) patients. Perioperative chemotherapy was preferentially proposed for synchronous metastases, whereas postoperative chemotherapy was more frequently used for metachronous metastases. Two-year DFS was 48.5% in the FOLFOX4 group and 50.0% in the FOLFOX7-FOLFIRI group. In the multivariable analysis, more than one metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.15] and synchronous metastases (HR = 1.63) were independent prognostic factors for shorter DFS. Five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 69.5% with FOLFOX4 versus 66.6% with FOLFOX7-FOLFIRI. CONCLUSIONS FOLFOX7-FOLFIRI is not superior to FOLFOX4 in patients with resectable metastatic CRC. Five-year OS rates observed in both groups are the highest ever reported in this setting, possibly reflecting the pragmatic approach to chemotherapy timing. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER NCT00268398.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hebbar
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Lille
| | - B Chibaudel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris
| | - T André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris
| | - L Mineur
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute Sainte-Catherine, Avignon
| | - D Smith
- Department of Medical Oncology and Radiotherapy, Hospital Saint-André, Bordeaux
| | - C Louvet
- Department of Oncology, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris
| | - J L Dutel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radiotherapy Service, Hospital Centre Beauvais, Beauvais
| | - M Ychou
- Regional Centre against Cancer, Val d'Aurelle-Paul Lamarque, Montpellier
| | - J L Legoux
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Hospital de Haut-Lévêque, Pessac
| | - M Mabro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Foch, Suresnes
| | - R Faroux
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital La Roche-sur-Yon, La Roche-sur-Yon
| | - D Auby
- Department of Medicine, Hospital Libourne, Libourne
| | | | - A Khalil
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Tenon, Paris
| | - S Truant
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital, Lille
| | | | - C Dalban
- Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Department EA 3181, Hospital Besançon, Besançon
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris
| | - F Paye
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris
| | - F R Pruvot
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital, Lille
| | - F Bonnetain
- Methodology and Quality of Life in Oncology Department EA 3181, Hospital Besançon, Besançon
| | - J Taieb
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Descartes, Paris
| | - P Brucker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre hospitalier François Maillot, Briey
| | - B Landi
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou Service Hépato-gastroentérologie; Paris
| | - M Flesch
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinique Clément Drevon, Dijon
| | - E Carola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier, Senlis
| | - P Martin
- Department of Cancerology, Centre Bourgogne, Lille
| | - E Vaillant
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinique Ambroise Paré, Lille, France
| | - A de Gramont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Paris
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schwarz L, Sauvanet A, Regenet N, Mabrut JY, Gigot JF, Housseau E, Millat B, Ouaissi M, Gayet B, Fuks D, Tuech JJ. Long-term survival after pancreatic resection for renal cell carcinoma metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol 2014; 21:4007-13. [PMID: 24879589 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-3821-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection of pancreatic metastasis (PM) is the only reported curative treatment for renal cell carcinoma. However, there is currently little information regarding very long-term survival. The primary objective of this study was to determine the 10-year survival of this condition using the largest surgical series reported to date. METHODS Between May 1987 and June 2003, we conducted a retrospective study of 62 patients surgically treated for PM from renal cell carcinoma at 12 Franco-Belgian surgical centers. Follow-up ended on May 31, 2012. RESULTS There were 27 male (44 %) and 35 female (56 %) patients with a median age of 54 years [31-75]. Mean disease-free interval from resection of primary tumor to reoperation for pancreatic recurrence was 9.8 years (median 10 years [0-25]). During a median follow-up of 91 months [12-250], 37 recurrences (60 %) were observed. After surgical resection of repeated recurrences, overall median survival time was 52.6 months versus 11.2 months after nonoperative management (p = 0.019). Cumulative 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 72, 63, and 32 %, respectively. The corresponding disease-free survival rates were 54, 35, and 27 %, respectively. Lymph node involvement and existence of extrapancreatic metastases before PM were associated with poor overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Aggressive surgical management of single or multiple PM, even in cases of extrapancreatic disease, should be considered in selected patients to allow a chance of long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Subar D, Gobardhan PD, Gayet B. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: An overview of the literature and experiences of a single center. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 28:123-32. [PMID: 24485260 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2013] [Revised: 10/10/2013] [Accepted: 11/23/2013] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic surgery was reported as early as 1898. Since then significant developments have been made in the field of pancreatic resections. In addition, advances in laparoscopic surgery in general have seen the description of this approach in pancreatic surgery with increasing frequency. Although there are no randomized controlled trials, several large series and comparative studies have reported on the short and long term outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. Furthermore, in the last decade published systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported on cost effectiveness and outcomes of these procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Subar
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Lancashire, UK.
| | - P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gobardhan PD, Subar D, Gayet B. Laparoscopic liver surgery: An overview of the literature and experiences of a single centre. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2014; 28:111-21. [PMID: 24485259 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2013] [Revised: 09/26/2013] [Accepted: 11/23/2013] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
In the past two decades there has been an enormous increase in laparoscopic liver surgery. There is a trend from limited to laparoscopic major resections and more centres are adopting laparoscopic liver surgery as a standard of care. Although no randomized clinical trials are published, different reports on minor and major hepatectomies and meta-analyses suggest (at least) equal outcomes and cost-effectiveness compared to open procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P D Gobardhan
- Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
| | - D Subar
- Department of General and HPB Surgery, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Lancashire, UK.
| | - B Gayet
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Menudet JF, Zarhaee A, Solano B, Szewczyk J, Herman B, Rotinat C, Vidal C, Gayet B. Projet ID2U : instrument dextre à usage unique. Ing Rech Biomed 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2011.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
22
|
|
23
|
Zaanan A, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Guilloux A, Parc Y, Louvet C, de Gramont A, Tiret E, Dumont S, Gayet B, Validire P, Fléjou JF, Duval A, Praz F. Impact of p53 expression and microsatellite instability on stage III colon cancer disease-free survival in patients treated by 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin. Ann Oncol 2010; 21:772-780. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
24
|
Mal F, Choury AD, De Castro V, Christidis C, Carbognani D, Validire P, Gayet B. [Fatal venous air embolism during biliary endoscopy]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2010; 34:e17-e18. [PMID: 20171031 DOI: 10.1016/j.gcb.2009.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2009] [Revised: 11/12/2009] [Accepted: 12/15/2009] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
|
25
|
Morel A, Marteau V, Chambon E, Gayet B, Zins M. Pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma communicating with the main pancreatic duct on MRI. Br J Radiol 2010; 82:e243-5. [PMID: 19934064 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/98185084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
We report a case of a mucinous cystadenoma of the pancreas communicating with the main pancreatic duct. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which a communication between the mucinous cystadenoma and the main pancreatic duct could be demonstrated by MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Morel
- Department of Radiology, Saint Joseph Hospital, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Slim K, Blay JY, Brouquet A, Chatelain D, Comy M, Delpero JR, Denet C, Elias D, Fléjou JF, Fourquier P, Fuks D, Glehen O, Karoui M, Kohneh-Shahri N, Lesurtel M, Mariette C, Mauvais F, Nicolet J, Perniceni T, Piessen G, Regimbeau JM, Rouanet P, sauvanet A, Schmitt G, Vons C, Lasser P, Belghiti J, Berdah S, Champault G, Chiche L, Chipponi J, Chollet P, De Baère T, Déchelotte P, Garcier JM, Gayet B, Gouillat C, Kianmanesh R, Laurent C, Meyer C, Millat B, Msika S, Nordlinger B, Paraf F, Partensky C, Peschaud F, Pocard M, Sastre B, Scoazec JY, Scotté M, Triboulet JP, Trillaud H, Valleur P. [Digestive oncology: surgical practices]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 146 Suppl 2:S11-80. [PMID: 19435621 DOI: 10.1016/s0021-7697(09)72398-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- K Slim
- Chirurgien Clermont-Ferrand.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Weiswald LB, Richon S, Validire P, Briffod M, Lai-Kuen R, Cordelières FP, Bertrand F, Dargere D, Massonnet G, Marangoni E, Gayet B, Pocard M, Bieche I, Poupon MF, Bellet D, Dangles-Marie V. Newly characterised ex vivo colospheres as a three-dimensional colon cancer cell model of tumour aggressiveness. Br J Cancer 2009; 101:473-82. [PMID: 19603013 PMCID: PMC2720229 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: New models continue to be required to improve our understanding of colorectal cancer progression. To this aim, we characterised in this study a three-dimensional multicellular tumour model that we named colospheres, directly obtained from mechanically dissociated colonic primary tumours and correlated with metastatic potential. Methods: Colorectal primary tumours (n=203) and 120 paired non-tumoral colon mucosa were mechanically disaggregated into small fragments for short-term cultures. Features of tumours producing colospheres were analysed. Further characterisation was performed using colospheres, generated from a human colon cancer xenograft, and spheroids, formed on agarose by the paired cancer cell lines. Results: Colospheres, exclusively formed by viable cancer cells, were obtained in only 1 day from 98 tumours (47%). Inversely, non-tumoral colonic mucosa never generated colospheres. Colosphere-forming capacity was statistically significantly associated with tumour aggressiveness, according to AJCC stage analysis. Despite a close morphology, colospheres displayed higher invasivity than did spheroids. Spheroids and colospheres migrated into Matrigel but matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and MMP-9 activity was detected only in colospheres. Mouse subrenal capsule assay revealed the unique tumorigenic and metastatic phenotype of colospheres. Moreover, colospheres and parental xenograft reproduced similar CD44 and CD133 expressions in which CD44+ cells represented a minority subset of the CD133+ population. Conclusion: The present colospheres provide an ex vivo three-dimensional model, potentially useful for studying metastatic process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L-B Weiswald
- IFR71 Sciences du Médicament, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université Paris Descartes, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, F-75006 Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Perez-Staub N, Chibaudel B, Paye F, Taieb J, Gayet B, Bourges O, André T, Tournigand C, Louvet C, de Gramont A. Survival after surgery in patients with initially resectable metastasis receiving adjuvant/neoadjuvant FOLFOX therapy and in patients who had surgery after FOLFOX therapy. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.4118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4118 Background: Surgery of metastases can cure approximately 20% of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). About 15% of MCRC pts are resectable at presentation. Among the other pts, 10 to 30% can benefit from a salvage surgery after response to chemotherapy, improving their prognostic. We report here the results in pts resectable at presentation and in pts who underwent surgery after chemotherapy in phase 2 and 3 studies. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 167 pts who underwent R0/R1 surgery, 46 pts at presentation in a phase 2 study testing a combination of FOLFOX followed by FOLFIRI (MIROX, Taieb JCO 2005), and 121 pts who underwent a salvage surgery after FOLFOX treatment in OPTIMOX1 (Tournigand, JCO 2006) and OPTIMOX2 (Maindrault-Goebel, ASCO 2007) after updating the survival. Results: Patients’ baseline characteristics were (MIROX/OPTIMOX %): median age 56/62 yrs, PS 0 50/73, metachronous metastasis 41/21, ≥ 2 met sites 11/18, liver met 78/88, lung met 11/19, other met 17/10, two-stage surgery 9/10, second surgery after relapse 39/22, R0 resection 91/ 85. 114 among 142 evaluable patients had a response to FOLFOX (80%). Median time from randomisation to surgery was 8 mths in the OPTIMOX group. In the MIROX group, 46% had surgery of metastases before chemotherapy. Median disease-free survival from R0/R1 surgery was 18.6 months in MIROX group vs 9.4 months in OPTIMOX group (p=0.006).Median overall survival was 104.8 months in MIROX group vs 42.6 months in OPTIMOX group (p=0.02). Furthermore, initially resectable remained the strongest prognostic factor in this series. Conclusions: MCRC pts initially resectable at presentation have a better prognosis than pts who underwent a salvage surgery after FOLFOX chemotherapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Perez-Staub
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - B. Chibaudel
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - F. Paye
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - J. Taieb
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - B. Gayet
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - O. Bourges
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - T. André
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - C. Tournigand
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - C. Louvet
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - A. de Gramont
- Hôpital St-Antoine, Paris, France; Hopital Pitie Salpetrière, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Zaanan A, Cuilliere-Dartigues P, Parc Y, Louvet C, Tiret E, Gayet B, Validire P, Fléjou J, Duval A, Praz F. Impact of microsatellite instability and p53 expression on stage III colon cancer disease-free survival in patients treated by fluorouracil and leucovorin with or without oxaliplatin. J Clin Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.15017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
30
|
Auguste T, Levard H, Mal F, Strauss C, Lemaistre AI, Gayet B. [A submucosal gastric tumor]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 144:261-3. [PMID: 17925725 DOI: 10.1016/s0021-7697(07)89540-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- T Auguste
- Département médico-chirurgical de pathologie digestive, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris-Paris, Université René Descartes-Paris 5, 42 boulevard Jourdan, Paris
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dangles-Marie V, Validire P, Richon S, Weiswald L, Briffod M, Pecking A, Gayet B, Bellet D. Isolation and characterization of spontaneous spheroid aggregates within human colon carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2007. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.25.18_suppl.14515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
14515 Background: In vitro spheroid model using cancer cell lines is widely admitted to mimic in vivo micro tumors, including micrometastases. Floating spheroid cell cluster culture has been recently used for normal and cancer stem cell expansion. Spontaneously spheroids generated in vivo have been only studied in ovarian cancer ascites while organoid aggregates have been sometimes observed in the establishment of human colon cancer cell lines. In this study, we investigated whether spontaneous spheroid aggregates from colon cancer could be isolated and characterized. Methods: 127 colorectal primary tumor specimens have been collected and mechanically dissociated into small fragments, which were then shortly cultured on cell plastic flask. Production of spheroid- like structures, referred to as colospheres, was examined at Day 1 and colospheres were gathered for phenotypic characterization. Results: Colospheres were successfully generated from 67 surgical specimens (53%). The capacity to form colospheres was strictly restricted to tumor tissue: dissociated normal colon mucosa never generated colospheres and colospheres were formed exclusively by cancer cells. The ability to generate colospheres was demonstrated to be significantly related to tumor aggressiveness, according to nodal status and AJCC’s stages (Chi-2 test, p<0.05). Immunohistochemical studies showed that cells forming colospheres were frequently positive for Ki67, and displayed often a disturbed expression of the epithelial caretaker E-cadherin. Peripheral cells of colospheres were able to migrate into Matrigel in absence of any chemoattractant. Conclusions: Collectively, the morphology of these colospheres derived directly from tumoral tissues and made up exclusively of cancer cells, their potential capacity to acquire an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition phenotype and their in vitro migration ability could be aligned with the collective migration properties of carcinomas. Consequently, these ex vivo spherical structures might form an in vitro cell system for micrometastasis studies, at the very time when mortality among colorectal cancer patients continues to be attributed to metastasis development. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. Dangles-Marie
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| | - P. Validire
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| | - S. Richon
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| | - L. Weiswald
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| | - M. Briffod
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| | - A. Pecking
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| | - B. Gayet
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| | - D. Bellet
- Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologique, Paris, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint Cloud, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Champault G, Descottes B, Dulucq JL, Fabre JM, Fourtanier G, Gayet B, Johanet H, Samama G. [Laparoscopic surgery. The recommendations of specialty societies in 2006 (SFCL-SFCE)]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 143:160-4. [PMID: 16888601 DOI: 10.1016/s0021-7697(06)73644-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Champault
- Société Française de Chirurgie Laparoscopique (SFCL), Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Jean Verdier, Bondy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Perez-Staub N, Lledo G, Paye F, Gayet B, Flesch M, Cervantes A, Figer A, Bourges O, André T, De Gramont A. Surgery of colorectal metastasis in the Optimox 1 study. A GERCOR Study. J Clin Oncol 2006. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.3522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
3522 Background: Surgery of metastasis can cure arround 20% of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients. The Optimox 1 study achieved a response rate over 50% with FOLFOX therapy in patients (pts) with initially unresectable metastasis which allowed to perform surgery in a significant number of pts (JCO 2006). We report here the results in pts who underwent surgery of metastasis (met). Methods: From jan 2000 to june 2002, 620 previously untreated patients with unresectable metastasis were randomized between FOLFOX4 every two weeks until progression (arm A), or FOLFOX7 for 6 cycles, maintenance without oxaliplatin for 12 cycles and reintroduction of FOLFOX7 (arm B). 101 pts were resected with a curative intent, 57 in arm A and 45 in arm B. Results: Patients characteristics were (arm A/B %): metachronous metastasis 77/51, liver met 82/91, lung met 16/11, other met 7/4, PAL < 3 ULN: 98/97, normal LDH: 52/51. 8% of pts achieved a complete response, 72% a partial response, 16% a stable disease. 89 pts had a single resection, 12 had a two-stage surgery. One patient died in arm B. Eleven pts who relapsed had a second surgery. Resection was radical (R0) for 71 pts (43 in arm A and 28 in arm B), 15 were R1 (margin invasion) and 15 were R2. R0/R1 patients had a median overall survival (OS) of 51 mo in arm A and 38 mo in arm B. Median disease-free survival (DFS) since surgery was 12 mo in arm A and 9 mo in arm B, with no statistical difference. 32% of R0/R1 pts were alive with no progression at 3 years in arm A and 20% in arm B. Median time from randomization to surgery was 8 mo. No difference was found between patients resected before 8 mo (n = 50) and after (n = 37) in OS (39 vs 45 mo, p = .67) nor in DFS (11.6 vs 9.5 mo, p = .24). Neither in pts resected before and after 6 mo in OS (p = .77) and DFS (p = .44). Conclusions: FOLFOX treatment allowed 14 % of unresectable patients to be rescued by surgery. There was no additional benefit to perform surgery after 6 months of therapy compared to early surgery. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Perez-Staub
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - G. Lledo
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - F. Paye
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - B. Gayet
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - M. Flesch
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - A. Cervantes
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - A. Figer
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - O. Bourges
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - T. André
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - A. De Gramont
- St-Antoine hospital, Paris, France; Clinique St. Jean, Lyon, France; Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France; Clinique Drevon, Dijon, France; Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain; Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Champault G, Descottes B, Dulucq JL, Fabre JM, Fourtanier G, Gayet B, Johanet H, Samama G. [Laparoscopie surgery: guidelines of specialized societies in 2006, SFCL-SFCE]. Ann Chir 2006; 131:415-20. [PMID: 16762309 DOI: 10.1016/j.anchir.2006.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Champault
- Service de Chirurgie Digestive, CHU Jean-Verdier, avenue du-14-juillet, 93140 Bondy, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Levard H, Curt F, Perniceni T, Denet C, Gayet B. Traitement cœlioscopique des éventrations. Étude prospective non randomisée de 51 éventrations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 131:244-9. [PMID: 16360112 DOI: 10.1016/j.anchir.2005.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2005] [Accepted: 11/03/2005] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY Insertion of a mesh in treatment of incisional hernias reduces the risk of recurrence. A single prospective randomized trial have compared laparoscopic and open approach: there were less postoperative complications and fewer recurrences in the laparoscopic group. Aim of this prospective trial was to control these results. PATIENTS AND METHODS From January 2000 to May 2005, 51 consecutive incisional hernias were operated on by a laparoscopic approach. Incisional hernia was single in 41 and double in 5. It was median in 41 and lateral in 10. Previous hernia repair was noticed in 33.3%. Main criteria was recurrence. We have considered whether one of the following criteria was associated with the risk of recurrence: sex, obesity, previous repair, pre and preoperative sizes of the hernia, uni or multi orificial aspect of the hernia, median or lateral location, mesh size, ratio mesh surface/hernia surface. Others were postoperative mortality and morbidity, duration of hospitalisation and occurrence of late events. RESULTS At 2 years all patients were followed. Follow up achieved 3 years in 23 cases and 4 years in 9. Recurrence was observed in 7 (13.7%). None predictive factor was disclosed. No death occurred. Median postoperative pain score at D1, D2 and D3 was respectively 3.1+/-1.9, 2.9+/-2.3 and 2.3+/-2.1. Mean postoperative stay was 4.1+/-1.9 days. Seven postoperative complications occurred, al benign. During follow-up 18 events were noticed and of these 8 were chronic abdominal pain. CONCLUSION This technique could be employed for every type of incisional hernia but peristomial hernias (not assessed in this study) and every patient. Technical improvements ought to be find to reduce recurrence rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Levard
- Département Médicochirurgical de Pathologie Digestive, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This paper describes a 10-year experience of laparoscopic liver surgery, including several major hepatectomies for malignant tumours. METHODS Of 243 hepatectomies carried out between January 1995 and December 2004, 113 (46.5 per cent) were performed by laparoscopy and 89 were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS Twenty-four laparoscopic hepatectomies (27 per cent) were for benign disease and 65 (73 per cent) for malignant tumours, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in 16 patients and colorectal metastasis (CRM) in 41. Minor hepatectomy was performed in 51 patients and major hepatectomy (three or more Couinaud segments) in 38. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 12 patients and perioperative blood transfusion in eight. One patient with cirrhosis who underwent right hepatectomy for HCC with conversion to open surgery died 8 days after surgery. Major morbidity occurred in eight patients (16 per cent) having minor hepatectomy and in 11 (29 per cent) of those having a major resection. The 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates for patients with CRM (mean follow-up 30 months) were 87 (11 patients at risk) and 51 (6 patients at risk) per cent respectively. Corresponding values for patients with HCC (mean follow-up 40 months) were 85 (10 patients at risk) and 68 (5 patients at risk) per cent. CONCLUSION In experienced hands, the results of laparoscopic liver surgery are similar to those for laparotomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Vibert
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Montsouris Institute, University Paris V, 42 Boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gayet B, Cavaliere D, Castel B, Carlini F, Vibert E, Mal F. [Laparoscopic liver surgery for metastases of colorectal cancer: analysis of a monocentric experience]. Suppl Tumori 2005; 4:S135-7. [PMID: 16437952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in laparoscopic techniques, refinements of instruments and growth of practical experience in liver surgery during the last decade have prompted some surgeons to develop the laparoscopic approach for hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer (MCRC). AIMS Primary end points of this clinical study were safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic hepatectomy for MCRC, including early postoperative results and long-term outcomes (overall survival and disease-free survival). DESIGN Retrospective analysis of data (clinicopathologic, operative, perioperative ad late results) collected in a prospective database. PATIENTS Between January 1997 and December 2004, 37 non-consecutive (selected) patients underwent curative laparoscopic hepatic resection (n = 42) for MCRC at Montsouris Institut of Paris. Resection was considered when all liver metastases can be totally removed with clear margins, and in absence of nonresectable extrahepatic diseases. Among them were 24 males and 13 females with average ages of 63.4 years (range, 42-78). RESULTS Metastases were metachronous in 18, multiple in 21, bilateral in 12, and <5 cm in diameter in 30. There were 21 major hepatectomies (n = 3 Couinaud's segments or more), 4 anatomical minor resections, and 12 wedge resections. Mean operative time was 324 +/- 105 mins. Conversion to laparotomy was necessary in 6 patients (16%), due to massive intractable bleeding in 3 patients, multiples adhesions in 1 patient, technical reasons (location of the lesion) in 1 patient, and for presence of localized carcinosis in 1 patient. Portal triad clamping was performed in 6 patients. Mean operative blood loss was 797 +/- 645 ml, and transfusions were required in 4 patients (11%). Clear resection margins (> 5 mm) were observed in 94%. Postoperative mortality was nil. The overall morbidity rate was 35%, with 2 early reoperations due to hemorrhage and postoperative ileus. Overall and disease free survival at 36 months were 87% and 55%, respectively. Five patients who had a recurrence of metastatic liver disease were referred to a second laparoscopic resection. CONCLUSION This clinical study suggests that laparoscopic liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer can be accomplished safely, in selected patients and by experienced surgeons, with good early results and without detrimental consequences on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Gayet
- Département de Pathologie Digestive, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
André T, Tournigand C, Rosmorduc O, Provent S, Maindrault-Goebel F, Avenin D, Selle F, Paye F, Hannoun L, Houry S, Gayet B, Lotz JP, de Gramont A, Louvet C. Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study. Ann Oncol 2005. [PMID: 15319238 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh351.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) has been used in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we studied its activity and tolerability in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (ABTA). PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive adult patients with confirmed ABTA were recruited from four centers. Those in group A had performance status (PS) 0-2, bilirubin <2.5x normal and received GEMOX as first-line chemotherapy. Those in group B had PS >2 and/or bilirubin >2.5x normal and/or prior chemotherapy. All received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 as a 10 mg/m2/min infusion on day 1, followed by oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on day 2, every 2 weeks. RESULTS Tumor sites were gallbladder (19), extrahepatic bile ducts (5), ampulla of vater (3) and intrahepatic bile ducts (29). Results for group A (n = 3) were: objective response 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.7% to 52.3%], stable disease 26%, progressive disease 39%, median progression-free survival (PFS) 5.7 months and overall survival (OS) 15.4 months. Results for group B (n = 23) were: objective response 22% (95% CI 6.5% to 37.4%), stable disease 30%, progressive disease 48%, PFS 3.9 months and OS 7.6 months. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia 14% of patients, thrombocytopenia 9%, nausea/vomiting 5% and peripheral neuropathy 7%. CONCLUSION The GEMOX combination is active and well tolerated in ABTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T André
- Oncology Department, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
André T, Tournigand C, Rosmorduc O, Provent S, Maindrault-Goebel F, Avenin D, Selle F, Paye F, Hannoun L, Houry S, Gayet B, Lotz JP, de Gramont A, Louvet C. Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: a GERCOR study. Ann Oncol 2004; 15:1339-43. [PMID: 15319238 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 270] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since gemcitabine-oxaliplatin (GEMOX) has been used in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, we studied its activity and tolerability in advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma (ABTA). PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive adult patients with confirmed ABTA were recruited from four centers. Those in group A had performance status (PS) 0-2, bilirubin <2.5x normal and received GEMOX as first-line chemotherapy. Those in group B had PS >2 and/or bilirubin >2.5x normal and/or prior chemotherapy. All received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 as a 10 mg/m2/min infusion on day 1, followed by oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 as a 2-h infusion on day 2, every 2 weeks. RESULTS Tumor sites were gallbladder (19), extrahepatic bile ducts (5), ampulla of vater (3) and intrahepatic bile ducts (29). Results for group A (n = 3) were: objective response 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.7% to 52.3%], stable disease 26%, progressive disease 39%, median progression-free survival (PFS) 5.7 months and overall survival (OS) 15.4 months. Results for group B (n = 23) were: objective response 22% (95% CI 6.5% to 37.4%), stable disease 30%, progressive disease 48%, PFS 3.9 months and OS 7.6 months. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia 14% of patients, thrombocytopenia 9%, nausea/vomiting 5% and peripheral neuropathy 7%. CONCLUSION The GEMOX combination is active and well tolerated in ABTA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T André
- Oncology Department, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
de Calan L, Gayet B, Bourlier P, Perniceni T. Cancer du rectum : anatomie chirurgicale, préparation à l'intervention, installation du patient. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004. [DOI: 10.1016/j.emcchi.2004.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
41
|
|
42
|
Levard H, Strauss C, Fromont G, Zins M, Gayet B. [A cystic tumor of the abdomen]. J Chir (Paris) 2003; 140:289-90. [PMID: 14631295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- H Levard
- Département de pathologie digestive. Institut mutualiste Montsouris, Paris.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Costi R, Denet C, Sarli L, Perniceni T, Roncoroni L, Gayet B. Laparoscopy in the last decade of the millennium: have we really improved? Surg Endosc 2003; 17:791-7. [PMID: 12582758 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9108-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2002] [Accepted: 09/12/2002] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of the study were to evaluate the evolution of laparoscopic surgery during the past decade in terms of variations in the quality (complexity) of the procedures performed and of modifications in patient outcome. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed of 3022 consecutive patients undergoing 99 different laparoscopic procedures at a center specialized in laparoscopic abdominal surgery. All the procedures were classified according to three classes of complexity. Results relating to the first 1511 patients were compared to those of the last 1511 patients. RESULTS In the second group, medium- to high-class complexity procedures significantly increased, conversion rate was higher only for straightforward procedures, duration of low- to medium-class complexity procedures decreased, only the rate of slight complications increased, and mean postoperative hospital stay was longer. Frequency of conversion in medium- to high-class complexity procedures and severe complications was not different in the two periods. CONCLUSIONS The quality of laparoscopic surgery has improved during the past decade, with no increase in the frequency of conversion or of major complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Costi
- Instituto di Clinica Chirurgica Generale e Terapia Chirurgica, Università di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Gouillat C, Faucheron JL, Balique JG, Gayet B, Saric J, Partensky C, Baulieux J, Chipponi J. [Natural history of the pancreatic stump after duodenopancreatectomy of the pancreatic head]. Ann Chir 2002; 127:467-76. [PMID: 12122721 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3944(02)00804-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Major complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy are thought to be chiefly associated with exocrine secretion of the pancreatic remnant which is not well known. This work aims to assess the exocrine secretion of the pancreatic remnant within the early post-operative period. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy-five patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for presumed tumour were included in a prospective multicentre study. A tube was inserted in the pancreatic duct at the time of construction of the pancreatic anastomosis. Peripancreatic drainage was routinely used. Pancreatic juice and peripancreatic drainage fluid were collected and measured and pancreatic enzyme monitored. For 7 days patients received total parenteral nutrition and continuous infusion of randomly Somatostatin 14 (S-14) at a dose of 6 mg/24 h (days 1-6) and 3 mg/24 h (day 7) or matching placebo. Pancreatic fistula was defined as a daily drainage of more than 100 cc of amylase-rich fluid after day 3, persisting after day 12 or associated with symptoms or needing specific treatment. RESULTS Daily output of pancreatic juice was low during the first postoperative day and then increased gradually until day 5. A high enzyme concentration was observed in pancreatic juice on the first post-operative day. S-14 infusion resulted in a significant decrease of both pancreatic fistula rate and enzyme concentration in peripancreatic fluid. CONCLUSIONS During the first postoperative days, the outflow of the exocrine secretion of the pancreatic remnant is low but contains a high enzyme concentration with significant leaks within the peripancreatic area. S-14 infusion results in a decrease of pancreatic juice leaks from the pancreatic remnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gouillat
- Services de chirurgie, Hôtel-Dieu, 1, place de l'hôpital, 69288 Lyon, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Gouillat C, Chipponi J, Baulieux J, Partensky C, Saric J, Gayet B. Randomized controlled multicentre trial of somatostatin infusion after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88:1456-62. [PMID: 11683740 DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01906.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It remains debatable whether somatostatin can prevent pancreatic fistula and other pancreatic stump-related complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy. This study assessed the effects of somatostatin-14 (S-14) on pancreatic remnant exocrine secretion. METHODS This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy. Patients received a continuous infusion of S-14 (n = 38) or placebo (n = 37) for 7 days. Pancreatic juice and peripancreatic drainage fluid was collected and measured, and pancreatic enzymes were monitored daily. Postoperative complications were recorded. RESULTS S-14 infusion was associated with a decrease in median daily pancreatic juice and pancreatic amylase output. Amylase concentration and output in the peripancreatic drain fluid were significantly lower after S-14 infusion than in the control group (both P < 0.05). The incidence of clinical pancreatic fistula (two of 38 versus eight of 37; P < 0.05) and total pancreatic stump-related complications (five of 38 versus 12 of 37; P < 0.05) was lower in patients treated with S-14. Duration of hospital stay was shorter after S-14 (18 versus 26 days; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION Although the effect of S-14 on exocrine secretion remains difficult to demonstrate, it did reduce pancreatic juice leakage from the pancreatic remnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gouillat
- Department of Surgery, Hôtel Dieu, Bordeaux, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Levard H, Carbonnel F, Perniceni T, Mal F, Denet C, Christidis C, Boudet MJ, Godeberge P, Gayet B. [Minimally invasive surgery for diverticula of the thoracic esophagus. Results in 11 patients]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001; 25:885-90. [PMID: 11852392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Surgical treatment of diverticula of the esophagus is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. Few data have been published concerning results of minimally invasive surgery. The aim of the study was to retrospectively assess the results of minimally invasive surgery (either thoracoscopy or laparoscopy) in a first series of patients with diverticula of the thoracic esophagus. METHODS Eleven consecutive patients with symptomatic thoracic diverticula of the esophagus were operated on between December 1992 and March 1999. Five were operated on by right thoracoscopy, 4 by laparoscopy and 2 by thoracoscopy and laparoscopy. The procedure performed varied according to the location and the macroscopic aspect of the diverticulum, as well as of the associated disorders (gastroesophageal reflux, hiatal hernia and/or motor disorders). RESULTS Postoperative mortality was nil. Three patients developed an esophageal fistula; one with an esophago-bronchial fistula required another operation. Postoperative pain was treated with morphine (median duration 4 days) or IV paracetamol (5 days). Long term results were excellent in 1 patient, good in 6, fair in 2 and poor in 2. These 2 latter patients were operated on another time. One of them was operated on 3 years later for aperistalsis of the esophagus and the other one was operated 4.5 years later for paraesophageal hernia; late results of these operations were fair. CONCLUSION These results suggest that minimally invasive surgery does not confer significant benefit compared with open surgery in the treatment of diverticula thoracic esophagus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Levard
- Département Médico-Chirurgical de Pathologie Digestive, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hennequin C, Gayet B, Sauvanet A, Blazy A, Perniceni T, Panis Y, Mal F, Sarfati E, Valleur P, Belghiti J, Fekete F, Maylin C. Impact on survival of surgery after concomitant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cancers of the esophagus. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 49:657-64. [PMID: 11172946 DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)01399-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the results of chemoradiotherapy with or without surgery in locally-advanced esophageal carcinomas (T3 and/or nodal involvement). METHODS One hundred twelve patients with locally-advanced carcinoma of the esophagus without histologically proven invasion of the tracheobronchial tree or distant visceral metastases were treated with concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by re-evaluation; surgery was performed or chemoradiotherapy continued, based on tumor regression and the patient's general status. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of concomitant 5-fluorouracil (5FU)(1 g/m(2) day 1-3), cisplatinum (50 mg/m(2) day 1 and 2), and external beam irradiation up to a dose of 40 or 43.2 Gy. After a 4-week rest period, radical esophagectomy or a new cycle of chemoradiotherapy (up to a total dose of 65 Gy) was performed. RESULTS A complete clinical response was obtained in 25.7% of the patients and a partial response in 45.9%. Fifty patients underwent surgery, but only 38 patients had an esophagectomy. Post-esophagectomy mortality was 5.3%. A complete histologic response rate of 23.7% was obtained. Two- and 5-year survival rates were, respectively, 41.5% and 28.6% for the whole population. According to multivariate analysis, prognostic factors for survival were Karnofsky index, esophagectomy, and response to chemoradiotherapy. Five-year survival for patients who experienced a partial response to radiation and chemotherapy was 49.1% for those who had surgery and 23.5% for those treated without surgery (p = 0.003). There was no obvious benefit for the small number of patients treated surgically after complete response to radiation and chemotherapy. Toxicity, essentially hematologic, was moderate. CONCLUSION For locally-advanced esophageal carcinomas, esophagectomy, after concomitant chemoradiotherapy, could improve the survival rate, especially for patients who responded partially to the latter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hennequin
- Service de Cancérologie-Radiotherapie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1 avenue Claude vellefeaux, 75010 Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Nahon S, Boudet MJ, Godeberge P, Mal F, Lévy P, Perniceni T, Gayet B. [Achalasia mimicking psychiatric eating disorders]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001; 25:313-5. [PMID: 11395678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
Anorexia nervosa and psychogen vomiting are psychiatric eating disorders characterized by unexplained weight loss and induced vomiting. These diagnoses require absence of somatic disease. Achalasia is a primary disorder of the esophagus that can be responsible for the same symptoms. This may occult the real diagnosis, especially as dysphagia is not constant and variable in time. We report four cases of achalasia mistakenly diagnosed and treated as anorexia nervosa or psychogen vomiting. Achalasia was unrecognized because specific symptoms, such as dysphagia, were overlooked or misinterpreted by the patients' physicians and psychiatrists, or by the patients themselves. In patients with such eating disorders considered to be psychiatric, physicians should inquire about signs suggestive of achalasia. The diagnosis of achalasia is suspected by imaging and endoscopy, and confirmed or ruled out by manometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Nahon
- Département Médico-Chirurgical de Pathologie Digestive, Institut Montsouris, et Université Paris-VI, Paris
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hennequin C, Salemkour A, Mal F, Lecomte T, Boudet MJ, Perniceni T, Gayet B, Maylin C, Raymond E. [Chemotherapy with cisplatinum, carboplatin and 5FU-folinic acid, followed by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy in unresectable esophageal carcinomas]. Bull Cancer 2001; 88:203-7. [PMID: 11257595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The best chemotherapeutic regimen for advanced carcinoma of the esophagus remains to be determined. We have evaluated a combination of carboplatin, cisplatin and 5FU modulated by folinic acid. Patients. Twenty-seven patients (median age 57 yrs) with an unresectable carcinoma of the esophagus were included in this trial: 9 patients with a local relapse after surgery, 6 patients with a locally advanced (T4) tumor, and 12 patients with metastasis. Treatment schedule. Initial chemotherapy : carboplatine IV d1, AUC4; 5FU: bolus injection of 400 mg/m2 d1, followed by a continuous infusion of 600 mg/m2/24 h, d1 and d2; folinic acid (200 mg/m2) IV, before the 5FU bolus, d1 and d2; cisplatine 80 mg/m2, d3; on d15 and d16, 5FU and folinic acid were repeated with the same schedule. The second cycle began on d28. Concomitant chemo-radiotherapy with 5FU (1,000 mg/m2 d1 to d3), cisplatine (50 mg/m2 d1 and d2) and external irradiation (20 Gy in 10 fractions from d1 to d12) was then performed, for three cycles (until a total dose of 60 Gy). Results. TOXICITY neutropenia grade 3-4 (32%), thrombopenia grade 3-4 (18%). More important, a lymphopenia (< 500/mm3) was noted in 12 patients (43%). Accordingly, 4 serious infectious complications were observed, with three toxic deaths. Objective response rate: 44% after initial chemotherapy; 75% after chemoradiotherapy, with 8 complete responses (38%). Median survival was 7.4 months, with a one- and two-year survival of 33% and 17,8%, respectively. Conclusion. This association of cisplatin, carboplatin, and 5FU did not offer a better response rate than the classical 5FU-cisplatinum association. But serious infectious complications occurred during the trial. We do not recommended further evaluation of this biplatinum therapy with 5FU in advanced esophageal carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hennequin
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Perniceni T, Alves A, Levard H, Boudet MJ, Denet C, Gayet B. [Can common bile duct lithiasis be removed laparoscopically without external biliary drainage?]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2001; 25:149-53. [PMID: 11319439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023]
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY To evaluate the indications, feasibility and results of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones without biliary drainage. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1992 and 1999, laparoscopic procedures were performed in 70 consecutive patients, mean age 60 +/- 15 years (range: 18-82). Stone removal was attempted via the cystic duct (n=25) or choledocotomy (n=45). The emptiness of the common bile duct was checked by intraoperative cholangiography or endoscopy. After choledocotomy, closure was performed by interrupted or non-interrupted suture with slowly resorbable thread. Transcystic drainage was used whenever necessary. RESULTS Nine conversions to laparotomy were necessary (12.8%). Among the 61 patients who had an exclusively laparoscopic procedure, 21 were treated via the transcystic route and 40 through choledocotomy. Biliary endoscopy was possible in only 10 of the 21 patients (47.6%) treated via the transcystic route and in all with choledocotomy. No biliary drainage was used in 16 of the 21 patients treated via the transcystic route and in 39 of the 40 treated through choledocotomy. The 30-day mortality was 1/61 (1.6%). Morbidity was 9.8% and 2 patients underwent a second laparoscopic procedure (one fistula on a choledocotomy suture, one hemoperitoneum of unknown origin). An endoscopic sphincterotomy for residual stone was necessary in 4 patients (4/61, 6.5%), 2 after choledocotomy for an unrecognized stone without biliary drainage. CONCLUSIONS These results confirm the feasibility of laparoscopic treatment of common bile duct stones and suggest it can be performed without biliary drainage in most cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Perniceni
- Département Médico-Chirurgical de Pathologie Digestive, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, et Université Paris-VI, Paris, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|