Palliative gastrectomy and chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer

Who are optimal candidates for primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma? A population-based study

BACKGROUND

The research aimed to construct a novel predictive nomogram to identify specific metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (mGAC) populations who could benefit from primary tumor resection (PTR).

METHOD

Patients with mGAC were included in the SEER database and divided into PTR and non-PTR groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), least absolute shrink and selection operator (LASSO) regression, multivariable logistic regression, and multivariate Cox regression methods were then used. Finally, the prediction nomograms were built and tested.

RESULTS

3185 patients with mGAC were enrolled. Among the patients, 679 cases underwent PTR while the other 2506 patients didn't receive PTR. After PSM, the patients in the PTR group presented longer median overall survival (15.0 vs. 7.0 months, p < 0.001). Among the PTR group, 307 (72.9%) patients obtained longer overall survival than seven months (beneficial group). Then the LASSO logistic regression was performed, and gender, grade, T stage, N stage, pathology, and chemotherapy were included to construct the nomogram. In both the training and validation cohorts, the nomogram exhibited good discrimination (AUC: 0.761 and 0.753, respectively). Furthermore, the other nomogram was constructed to predict 3-, 6-, and 12-month cancer-specific survival based on the variables from the multivariate Cox analysis. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month AUC values were 0.794, 0.739, and 0.698 in the training cohort, and 0.805, 0.759, and 0.695 in the validation cohorts. The calibration curves demonstrated relatively good consistency between the predicted and observed probabilities of survival in two nomograms. The models' clinical utility was revealed through decision curve analysis.

CONCLUSION

The benefit nomogram could guide surgeons in decision-making and selecting optimal candidates for PTR among mGAC patients. And the prognostic nomogram presented great prediction ability for these patients.

Identification of optimal primary tumor resection candidates for metastatic gastric cancer: Nomograms based on propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

This study sought to develop and validate nomograms for screening patients with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) who are candidates for primary tumor resection (PTR) and evaluating the prognosis of mGC patients after PTR.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2016, we screened mGC patients with complete data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Depending on whether or not PTR was performed, we categorized patients into surgery and non-surgery groups. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the characteristics of the two groups. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Two predictive nomograms were developed using logistic regression to assess the likelihood of benefit. Two additional prognostic nomograms were developed to assess prognosis in mGC patients after PTR by Cox regression. Finally, nomograms were evaluated using a variety of methodologies.

RESULTS

Our study included 3594 mGC patients who met the criteria. PTR was associated with improved OS and CSS time (median OS time after PSM: 15 vs. 7 months, P < 0.05; median CSS time after PSM: 17 vs. 7 months, P < 0.05). The OS-related predictive nomogram, including age, histologic type, grade, T stage, and chemotherapy, was developed. Moreover, the CSS-related predictive nomogram, including age, histologic type, grade, and chemotherapy, was developed. Sex, histologic type, grade, T stage, N stage, and chemotherapy were found to be correlated with OS. Furthermore, the CSS correlated with histologic type, grade, T stage, N stage, and chemotherapy. Both predictive and prognostic nomograms were found to be valuable and reliable after different types of validation.

CONCLUSION

Predictive nomograms were developed and validated for identifying the optimal PTR mGC candidates. Prognostic nomograms were developed and validated for assessing the prognosis of mGC patients after PTR.

Lobectomy Can Improve the Survival of Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer With Lung Oligometastatic

Background: This study was to evaluate the value of lobectomy in the prognosis of Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with primary metastasis based on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Methods: This was a population-based retrospective study and the clinical data were collected from the National Cancer Institute's SEER database between 2010 and 2015. The effects of pulmonary surgery and surgical procedures on lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed, and the COX regression models were employed to evaluate the survival of primary surgery in patients with primary metastatic NSCLC (pmNSCLC) and the survival of surgical procedure in pmNSCLC patients. Results: A total of 55,717 patients diagnosed with pmNSCLC between 2010 and 2015 were enrolled, and pulmonary surgery was indicated in 1,575 (2.83%) patients. Surgery was an independent risk factor for LCSS (P < 0.001, HR 0.658, 95%CI: 0.637-0.680) and OS (P < 0.001, HR 0.665, 95%CI: 0.644-0.686) of pmNSCLC patients. The surgery was associated with better OS (P < 0.001, HR 0.678, 95%CI: 0.657-0.699). The site of metastasis was also related to the survival after primary tumor surgery (P = 0.001). As compared to the sublobectomy and pneumonectomy, lobectomy improved the LCSS for NSCLC patients with single-organ metastasis, rather than multiple metastases (P < 0.001). In patients receiving sublobectomy, lobectomy, and pneumonectomy, the median LCSS was 12, 28, and 13 months, respectively, and the 5-year LCSS rate was 14.39, 32.06, and 17.24%, respectively. Conclusion: The effect of locoregional surgery on the survival of pmNSCLC patients with single-organ metastasis has been underestimated, and lobectomy may be a preferred treatment for patients with single-lung metastasis.

Surgery Treatment Improved the Overall Survival Rate in Locoregional Myxoid Leiomyosarcoma than Other Myxosarcomas in the United States

Myxosarcomas are rare malignant tumors of soft connective tissues, classified into various subtypes, including myxoid liposarcoma, myxoid chondrosarcoma, and myxoid leiomyosarcoma. In this study, we proposed to study the demographic, tumor characteristics, and overall survival rate and compared the treatment modalities between these cancers. Patient data collected based on locoregional metastasis presentation of the abovementioned tumors with a cutoff study of survival duration up to 10 years were obtained from the SEER database during 1975-2016. Our results indicated that elderly patients and females were more in locoregional myxoid leiomyosarcoma than myxoid liposarcoma and myxoid chondrosarcoma with locoregional metastasis. The white race represented the most patients who suffered from these cancers than other races. The heart is the primary site for the abovementioned cancers, in addition to the female genitals to the myxoid leiomyosarcoma. Myxoid liposarcoma and myxoid chondrosarcoma patients with locoregional metastasis were suffering from grade II, while locoregional myxoid leiomyosarcoma patients with blank grading were due to missed data. Surgery was the most common treatment modality in this study compared with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in survival time between the three subtypes by using histology, and myxoid leiomyosarcoma showed prolonged survival than others. Elderly, female, white, unknown grade, surgery, no radiation, and no chemotherapy variables were independent factors associated with overall survival among these cancers. Multivariate analysis also showed significant differences in overall survival between the three tumors by histology, and myxoid leiomyosarcoma was with a better prognosis than others. Multivariate analysis of locoregional myxoid leiomyosarcoma showed the statistical significance of black race, grade, and radiotherapy, indicating them as independent prognostic factors of locoregional myxoid leiomyosarcoma. We conclude that surgery was the primary treatment modality against these cancers than radiotherapy and chemotherapy. And the locoregional myxoid leiomyosarcomas showed a better prognosis and higher survival rate than locoregional myxoid liposarcoma and locoregional myxoid chondrosarcoma.

Gastrectomy for stage IV gastric cancer: a comparison of different treatment strategies from the SEER database

In the West, more than one third of newly diagnosed subjects show metastatic disease in gastric cancer (mGC) with few care options available. Gastrectomy has recently become a subject of debate, with some evidence showing advantages in survival beyond the sole purpose of treatment tumor-related complications. We investigated the survival benefit of different strategies in mGC patients, focusing on the role and timing of gastrectomy. Data were extracted from the SEER database. Groups were determined according to whether patients received gastrectomy, chemotherapy, supportive care. Patients receiving a multimodality treatment were further divided according to timing of surgery, whether performed before (primary gastrectomy, PG) or after chemotherapy (secondary gastrectomy, SG). 16,596 patients were included. Median OS was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the SG (15 months) than in the PG (13 months), gastrectomy alone (6 months), and chemotherapy (7 months) groups. In the multivariate analysis, SG showed better OS (HR = 0.22, 95%CI = 0.18-0.26, p < 0.001) than PG (HR = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.23-0.28, p < 0.001), gastrectomy (HR = 0.40, 95%CI = 0.36-0.44, p < 0.001), and chemotherapy (HR = 0.42, 95%CI = 0.4-0.44, p < 0.001). The survival benefits persisted even after the PSM analysis. This study shows survival advantages of gastrectomy as multimodality strategy after chemotherapy. In selected patients, SG can be proposed to improve the management of stage IV disease.

Peri-operative Outcomes and Survival Following Palliative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with gastric cancer present with late stage disease. Palliative gastrectomy remains a contentious intervention aiming to debulk tumour and prevent or treat complications such as gastric outlet obstruction, perforation and bleeding.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature for all papers describing palliative resections for gastric cancer and reporting peri-operative or survival outcomes. Data from peri-operative and survival outcomes were meta-analysed using random effects modelling. Survival data from patients undergoing palliative resections, non-resective surgery and palliative chemotherapy were also combined. This study was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42019159136).

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-eight papers which included 58,675 patients contributed data. At 1 year, there was a significantly improved survival in patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy when compared to non-resectional surgery and no treatment. At 2 years following treatment, palliative gastrectomy was associated with significantly improved survival compared to chemotherapy only; however, there was no significant improvement in survival compared to patients who underwent non-resectional surgery after 1 year. Palliative resections were associated with higher rates of overall complications versus non-resectional surgery (OR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.34, 3.46; p < 0.001). However, palliative resections were associated with similar peri-operative mortality rates to non-resectional surgery.

CONCLUSION

Palliative gastrectomy is associated with a small improvement in survival at 1 year when compared to non-resectional surgery and chemotherapy. However, at 2 and 3 years following treatment, survival benefits are less clear. Any survival benefits come at the expense of increased major and overall complications.

Primary tumor removal improves the prognosis in patients with stage IV breast cancer: A population-based study (cohort study)

Adjuvant therapy including chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, and radiotherapy were often used as a common stereotypy for female stage IV breast cancer rather than surgery. This study aimed to define the role of local surgery in metastatic breast cancer. Female metastatic breast cancer patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data (2010-2013). We compared survival time between patients who received primary tumor removal (PTR) versus those who did not. Multivariate Cox regression models and competitive risk models were built to adjust potential confounders. Of 7669 female stage IV breast cancer patients, 2704 (35.3%) had surgery on their breast tumor and 4965 (64.7%) did not. In the entire cohort, women who underwent PTR had a 45% reduced risk of breast cancer-related death (multi-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.60) compared with women who did not undergo PTR (P < 0.001). In a cause-specific hazard model (CS model), the multivariable HRs (95% CI) for the association of PTR with breast cancer related-death were 0.54 (0.50-0.60) in the multivariate-adjusted analysis. Similar results were also observed in the sub-distribution hazard function model (SD model) with corresponding multivariate HRs (95%CI) of 0.57 (0.52-0.63). Our study suggested that PTR was associated with improved survival in female stage IV breast cancer patients. The role of PTR in these patients needs to be re-evaluated.

Laparoscopic gastrectomy and metastasectomy for stage IV gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The standard recommended treatment of stage IV gastric cancer is palliative chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of radical gastrectomy with metastasectomy in these patients, as well as to explore the feasibility and safety of a laparoscopic approach.

METHODS

117 consecutive patients with pathologically proven Stage IV gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy with metastasectomy were enrolled in this study. We evaluated short-term and long-term outcomes, comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery by propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival rate (OSR) was 23.2% and the median survival time (MST) was 19.8 months. After propensity scoring matching, the 5-year OSR and MST of laparoscopy group was 23.4%, 17.9 months and in the open group, it was 25.0%, 22.8 months (p = 0.882). The complication rate was 5.6% in the laparoscopy group and 23.4% in the open group (p = 0.069). In multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, chemotherapy cycle, and postoperative complication were independent prognostic factors of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Radical gastrectomy with metastasectomy could have a potential role in stage IV gastric cancer. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with metastasectomy in selected stage IV gastric cancer patients is safe and feasible.

Gastrectomy for Metastatic Gastric Cancer: a 15-year Experience from a Developing Country

The role of surgery in the management of metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical and oncologic outcomes of gastrectomy in patients with MGC. The study included prospectively collected data of patients with MGC operated at four medical centers in Yerevan, Armenia, between 2000 and 2014. Armenian National Center of Oncology Registry and hospital records were used to obtain survival data. Factors associated with performing gastrectomy in patients with MGC were analyzed by using the logistic regression model. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied for survival analysis, and the Cox regression model with backward selection was used for multivariate analysis. A total number of 733 patients were operated for gastric cancer including 112 (15.3%) with MGC. Of those, 70 underwent gastrectomy, while 42 had exploratory laparotomy or bypass. Morbidity and mortality were similar after gastrectomy and exploratory laparotomy/bypass (18.6 vs 21.4%, p = 0.71 and 2.9 vs 7.1% p = 0.36, respectively). Female gender, involvement of N1 and/or N2 lymph node stations, and differentiated adenocarcinoma were associated with opting for gastrectomy. Gastrectomy with synchronous resection of distant metastases resulted in postoperative outcomes similar to those following gastrectomy without synchronous organ resection. Median follow-up was 6 months. Eighteen (16.1%) patients received chemotherapy. Median survival following gastrectomy and exploratory laparotomy/bypass were 7 and 4 months (p = 0.015), respectively. The use of chemotherapy following gastrectomy significantly improved survival compared with gastrectomy only (14 vs 6 months, p = 0.01). In the multivariable analysis, chemotherapy and nodal stage correlated with survival after gastrectomy. Gastrectomy for MGC is associated with satisfactory surgical outcomes and can be combined with synchronous resection of distant metastases in selected patients. Gastrectomy results in longer survival compared with exploratory laparotomy/bypass, especially when followed by chemotherapy.

Palliative Gastrectomy and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Large Population-Based Study

OBJECTIVES

The role of palliative gastrectomy in the management of metastatic gastric cancer remains inadequately clarified.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with metastatic gastric cancer enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry from January 2004 to December 2012. Propensity score (PS) analysis with 1:1 matching and the nearest neighbor matching method was performed to ensure well-balanced characteristics of the groups of patients who undergone gastrectomy and those without gastrectomy. Data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models to evaluate the overall survival and cancer-specific survival rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In general, receiving any kind of gastrectomy was associated with an improvement in survival in the multivariate analyses (hazard ratio [HR]os = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.59-0.70, HRcss = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.57-0.68) and PS matching (PSM) analyses (HRos = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.56-0.70, HRcss = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.55-0.70). After PSM, palliative gastrectomy was found to be associated with remarkably improved survival for patients with stage M1 with only 1 metastasis but not associated with survival of patients with stage M1 with extensive metastasis (≥2 metastatic sites).

DISCUSSION

The results obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database suggest that patients with metastatic gastric cancer might benefit from palliative gastrectomy on the basis of chemotherapy. However, a PSM cohort study of this kind still has a strong selection bias and cannot replace a properly conducted randomized controlled trial.

Locoregional surgical treatment improves the prognosis in primary metastatic breast cancer patients with a single distant metastasis except for brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to validate the clinical significance of locoregional surgery in improving the prognosis of primary metastatic breast cancer (pMBC).

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective study by analyzing clinical data obtained from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Stratification analysis was employed to assess the effect of breast surgery on breast cancer-specific survival and overall survival. Then propensity score matching and COX regression models were employed to evaluate the survival advantages of breast surgery, if any in patients with pMBC.

RESULTS

The median BCSS and OS in the surgery group were almost twice of that in the group without surgery. Breast surgery provided a survival advantage for patients with a single metastasis in the bone, liver or lung, but not in the brain. We found that axillary lymph node dissection performed in combination with specific breast surgical procedures did not result in a significant improvement in survival. Additionally, when combined with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, surgery significantly improved the survival and was not influenced by the molecular subtype and tumor size. Finally, using COX regression models before and after propensity score matching, breast surgery was found to reduce the risk of mortality in patients with MBC by more than 40%.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of locoregional surgery has been underestimated in pMBC patients. Surgical procedures should be seriously considered when planning combination treatments for pMBC patients with a single metastasis except for brain metastasis.

The role of surgical resection before palliative chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

The role of palliative surgical resection in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer is still controversial. A retrospective review was conducted on 689 patients who received palliative chemotherapy for recurrent (n = 307) or primary metastatic (n = 382) gastric cancer. Among 131 patients (89 primary metastatic and 42 recurrent) with surgical resection before chemotherpay, 75 underwent gastrectomy, 42 metastasectomy, and 14 gastrectomy with metastasectomy. The median overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent surgical resection was significantly longer than that of patients who received chemotherapy alone (18 vs. 9 months, p < 0.0001). The OS benefit of surgical resection was consistent across subgroups. In multivariate analysis, surgical resection was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio = 0.42, p < 0.0001). Moreover, patients with surgical resection showed favorable OS both in univariate (p < 0.0001) and multivariate (p < 0.0001) analysis even after propensity score matching. In addition, the median OS of patients who underwent gross complete resection (n = 54) was significantly longer than that of patients who underwent incomplete resection (n = 77) (30 vs. 15 months, p = 0.002). The present study suggests that judicious use of surgical resection before chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer patients may result in a favorable outcome, especially when complete resection is achievable.

Retrospective Analysis on the Management of Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients. A Mono-institutional Experience. What happens in Clinical Practice?

Aims and background

Few studies show what happens outside of randomized clinical trials. The purpose of the study was to describe the clinical management of metastatic gastric cancer patients resident in the Forlì area from 2000 to 2009.

Methods and study design

A total of 270 metastatic gastric cancer patients at diagnosis or relapse were considered. Data from medical records were analysed, and survival probabilities were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 115 patients received best supportive care, 155 at least one line of chemotherapy, 71 (45.8%) underwent second-line therapy, and 49 (31.6%) required a drug dose reduction during the first cycle of first-line therapy. Twelve (7.7%) patients died within 15 days of finishing the last chemotherapy. Median overall survival with best supportive care or chemotherapy was 3 months (95% CI, 2–4) and 11 months (95% CI, 9–12) (P <0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions

Drug dose reductions and delivery of second-line therapy were common. Chemotherapy given towards the end of life was similar to other experiences. Median overall survival was similar to randomized clinical trials.

Surgical Considerations in the Management of Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Since Theodor Billroth and César Roux perfected the methods of postgastrectomy reconstruction in as early as the late nineteenth century, surgical management of gastric cancer has made incremental progress. The longstanding and contentious debate on the optimal extent of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer seems to have settled in favor of D2 dissection. Pylorus-preserving distal (central) gastrectomy has emerged as a less invasive, function-preserving option for T1N0 middle-third gastric cancers. Frozen section analysis of margins seems partially helpful in this direction. Last, the role of palliative gastrectomy in patients with metastatic seems less important than initially thought.

Palliative Gastrectomy Prolongs Survival of Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients with Normal Preoperative CEA or CA19-9 Values: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background. Palliative gastrectomy has been suggested to improve survival of patients with metastatic gastric cancer, but limitations in study design and availability of robust prognostic factors have cast doubt on the overall merit of this procedure. Methods. The characteristics and clinical outcomes of 173 patients diagnosed between 2008 and 2012 were analyzed to determine the value of palliative gastrectomy and to identify potential prognostic factors. Results. Median overall patient survival was 6.5 months. To attenuate potential selection bias, patients with adequate performance and survival time of ≥ 2 months since diagnosis were included for risk factor analysis (n = 137). The median overall survival was longer for patients who were younger than 60 years, had better performance status (8.7 versus 6.4 months, P = 0.015), received systemic chemotherapy, or had palliative gastrectomy in univariate analyses. Gastrectomy (P = 0.002) remained statistically significant in multivariate analyses. Subgroup analysis showed that patients aged < 60 years, CEA < 5 ng/mL or CA19-9 < 35 U/mL, obtained a survival advantage from palliative gastrectomy. In fact, palliative gastrectomy doubled overall survival for patients who had normal CEA and/or normal CA19-9. Conclusions. Palliative gastrectomy prolongs the survival of metastatic gastric cancer patients with normal CEA and/or CA19-9 level at the time of diagnosis.

The evaluation of surgical treatment for gastric cancer patients with noncurative resection

PURPOSE

This study aims to analyze the results of treatment in a series of 233 gastric cancer patients who underwent a noncurative resection.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients with noncurative treatment for advanced gastric cancer who were divided into three treatment groups: total gastrectomy (TG, n=150), distal gastrectomy (DG, n=44), and nonresection (NR, bypass procedure or chemotherapy only, n=39).

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis, surgical treatment (TG) and an absence of chemotherapy were significant independent prognostic factors for a poor survival. In the late period, the overall survival rate was significantly lower in the TG group than in the DG group (p=0.005) and was marginally lower than in the NR group (p=0.054). The resection group had a poorer compliance for chemotherapy than the NR group, and the TG group had a poorer compliance than the DG group (p<0.01). The morbidity rate was higher in the TG group than in the DG group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

TG is considered to be inappropriate for the treatment of noncurative gastric cancer because of the poor prognosis, high morbidity rates, and poor compliance for chemotherapy associated with the procedure. However, noncurative DG was acceptable and postoperative chemotherapy should be used in selected patients.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Patients Receiving Combined Surgical Resection for Gastric Cancer Liver Metastasis: Results from Two National Centers in China

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) in patients with gastric cancer liver metastasis (GCLM) who received combined surgical resection. A retrospective analysis of 46 patients from two hospitals was conducted. Patients were dichotomized into two groups (high LNR and low LNR) by the median value of LNR. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to carry out the subsequent multivariate analyses. And the relationship between LNR and clinicopathological characteristics was assessed. The cut-off value defining elevated LNR was 0.347. With a median follow-up of 67.5 months, the median OS and RFS of the patients were 17 and 9.5 months, respectively. Six patients survived for >5 years after surgery. Patients with higher LNR had significantly shorter OS and RFS than those with lower LNR. In the multivariate analyses, higher LNR and multiple liver metastatic tumors were identified as the independent prognostic factors for both OS and RFS. Elevated LNR was significantly associated with advanced pN stage (P <0.001), larger primary tumor size (P = 0.046), the presence of microvascular invasion (P = 0.008), and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.004). LNR may be prognostic indicator for patients with GCLM treated by synchronous surgical resection. Patients with lower LNR and single liver metastasis may gain more survival benefits from the surgical resection. Further prospective studies with reasonable study design are warranted.

The impact and optimal indication of non-curative gastric resection for stage IV advanced gastric cancer diagnosed during surgery: 10 years of experience at a single institute

Background

The survival benefit of non-curative gastric resection for patients with stage IV gastric cancer is still unclear.

Methods

Of the patients who underwent open abdominal surgery that was preoperatively intended to be a radical excision procedure for gastric cancer, 72 were diagnosed with stage IV during the operation. At this institution, non-curative gastric resection is performed whenever possible.

Results

Non-curative gastric resection was performed in 44 of the 72 patients. According to the survival analysis, the median survival times in the gastric resection and no-resection groups were 1.9 and 0.9 years, respectively (log-rank test, p = 0.014). Based on the multivariate analysis, we selected gastric resection (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.309; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.152–0.615) and postoperative chemotherapy (HR = 0.136; 95 % CI = 0.056–0.353) as independent factors associated with overall survival (OS). In the subgroup analyses of OS, the factors that were associated with gastric resection having no survival benefit were the existence of distant lymph node or liver metastasis (p = 0.527) and the lack of postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.589).

Conclusions

For patients who have distant lymph node or liver metastasis and those who will not undergo postoperative chemotherapy, non-curative gastric resection has no survival benefit.

Quality of life: A critical outcome for all surgical treatments of gastric cancer

Surgery represents the main curative therapeutic modality for gastric cancer, and it is occasionally considered for palliation as well as prophylaxis. Most frequently, surgical outcomes are conveyed in terms of oncological outcomes such as recurrence and survival. However, quality of life (QoL) is also important and should be considered when making treatment decisions - including the extent of and approach to surgery. Measurement of QoL usually involves the application of questionnaires. While there are multiple QoL questionnaires validated for use in oncology patients, there are very few that have been validated for use in those with gastric cancer. In this review, we discuss and compare the current status of QoL questionnaires in gastric cancer. More importantly, the impact of surgery for treatment, palliation and prophylaxis of gastric cancer on QoL will be described. These data should inform the surgeon on the optimal approach to treating gastric cancer, taking into account oncological outcomes. Knowledge gaps are also identified, providing a roadmap for future studies.

The effect of the gastrectomy on survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a study of ASMO

AIM

To investigate the role of surgical resection of primary tumor on overall survival (OS) in advanced gastric cancer patients at the time of diagnosis.

PATIENTS & METHODS

The survival rates of metastatic gastric cancer patients whose gastric primary tumor was resected at time of diagnosis were compared with metastatic gastric cancer patients whose primary tumor was nonresected.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival and OS in operated and nonoperated group were 10 versus 6, 14 versus 9 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, gastric resection of primary tumor, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, second-line chemotherapy had a significant effect on OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52 [95% CI: 0.38-0.71], HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.42-0.78], HR: 1.48 [1.09-2.01]; p ≤ 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Subpopulations of patients with metastatic gastric cancer might benefit from surgical removal of primary tumor.

Does surgery have a role in managing incurable gastric cancer?

Although the incidence of gastric cancer is decreasing, the outcomes of this disease are among the poorest of all solid-organ tumours, predominantly due to the frequent presence of stage IV metastatic disease at primary presentation. Stage IV gastric cancer is incurable and carries a very poor prognosis (5-year survival rate of ∼4%); palliative chemotherapy remains the standard of care, but increasing evidence indicates that palliative surgery can provide a prognostic and symptomatic benefit, particularly in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Ongoing prospective trials should further clarify the efficacy of palliative surgery in comparison with other treatment modalities. Until such data are available, surgery should not be offered as a standard first-line treatment, but can be considered in selected cases after thorough multidisciplinary discussions involving the patient. Patient selection for both gastrectomy and nonresectional surgery must include consideration of various factors that predict quality of life after surgery. This Perspectives summarizes the available evidence and discusses the utility of palliative surgery in relation to other therapeutic modalities in the management of incurable gastric cancer.

Gastrectomy in comprehensive treatment of advanced gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: a prospectively comparative study

Background

Systemic chemotherapy is the key treatment for advanced gastric cancer. The benefit of adjuvant surgery following preoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer with liver metastasis has not been well established.

Methods

Forty-nine gastric cancer patients diagnosed with synchronous liver metastasis initially treated with chemotherapy were categorized into the following two groups: surgery group: 25 patients who underwent gastrectomy and subsequently received postoperative chemotherapy and control group: 24 patients who received chemotherapy alone.

Results

The median overall survival of patients in the surgery group and control group was 20.5 and 9.1 months, respectively, (P = 0.006). The median progression-free survival in the surgery group was 10.9 months, with statistical significance when compared with 5.0 months in the control group (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that response to chemotherapy was the only independent factor in predicting prognosis. The survival of patients who achieved partial response (PR) was prolonged if they received adjuvant surgery (P = 0.024). No significant difference in the survival of patients underwent combined hepatic resection when compared with patients performed gastrectomy only.

Conclusions

For gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, adjuvant gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy might be beneficial for survival comparing with chemotherapy alone, especially in patients response to initial preoperative chemotherapy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12957-015-0627-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Role of Surgery in the Management for Gastric Cancer with Synchronous Distant Metastases

Optimal treatment of patients with gastric cancer with synchronous distant metastases is palliative chemotherapy. However, occasionally gastrectomy should be selected due to control bleeding from tumors, perforation, or obstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate the survival benefits of non-curative gastrectomy for patients with synchronous distant metastasis. Total 78 gastric cancer patients with synchronous distant metastasis treated in our hospital between 2003 and 2012 were enrolled in this study. Of these, 74 patients (95 %) received S1 based chemotherapy. During the treatment, 37 patients (47.4 %) underwent palliative gastrectomy because of bleeding from tumors (n = 15), tumor perforation (n = 6), and obstruction (n = 16). Survival benefits were compared in resected and non-resected patients, retrospectively. The two groups were clinicopathologically similar. Palliative gastrectomy was performed safely (morbidity: 10.8 % and mortality: 0) in resection group. However, resection showed survival benefits only in 13 patients (16.7 %) with single metastasis and without peritoneal metastasis. Their 2-year survival rate was 40 % and their median survival was 19 months. Non-curative gastrectomy with precise surgical techniques followed careful postoperative nutrition management may improve survival only for patients with a single metastatic site, except for peritoneal dissemination.

Metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients: Can we improve survival by metastasectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Prognosis with current management strategies continues to be dismal in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) patients. We aimed to evaluate the role of metastasectomy in improving survival.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane central databases (1965 to present) was performed. All comparative studies measuring survival in MGC patients undergoing metastasectomy versus other therapies were included. Pooled risk ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for survival at 1, 3, and 5 years.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with 1712 patients (378 patients in metastasectomy, 1334 patients in other therapies) were eligible for the final meta-analysis. Median age was 63 years. For patients undergoing metastasectomy, a significant survival advantage was observed at 1 year (RR 0.52, CI 0.43-0.62), 3 year (RR 0.75 CI 0.67-0.83), and 5 year (RR 0.82, CI 0.74-0.91); mean increased difference in survival conferred by metastasectomy averaged between 9.3 and 15.7 months; P < 0.001 for all results. Age, ECOG status, and STROBE score did not contribute to differences in survival.

CONCLUSION

Metastasectomy is associated with increased survival at 1, 3, and 5 years in MGC patients. Large prospective randomized controlled trials are critically needed to evaluate the role of metastasectomy in MGC.

Secondary gastrectomy for stage IV gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after induction-chemotherapy

PURPOSE

With improved chemotherapeutic regimens, metastasized gastric cancer may show a good response rendering an initially unresectable tumor resectable. We performed a retrospective analysis on the outcome of stage IV gastric cancer patients treated by chemotherapy followed by oncologic resection in a western institution.

METHODS

From August 1988 to December 2010, a total number of 1,817 patients underwent surgery for gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich. A retrospective analysis of our prospective gastric cancer database identified 58 patients with stage IV gastric cancer having undergone induction chemotherapy followed by surgery in an individualized treatment concept. After induction chemotherapy usually consisting of 2 cycles of PLF (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin), resection was performed with or without removal of metastases in patients without disease progression. Patients were followed up until death or loss to follow up.

RESULTS

The three most common metastatic locations were liver (27.6 %), distant lymph nodes (22.4 %), and peritoneum (19.0 %). Of patients, 13.8 % had metastases in more than one location. Thirty-day mortality was 5.2 %, 90-day mortality was 13.8 %, while overall postoperative morbidity accounted for 24 %. In 19 (32.8 %) patients, a complete resection without any macroscopic tumor residues was achieved. In 39 (67.2 %) patients, tumors could not be completely removed with either local residual disease or residual disease at distant sites. Overall median survival was 20 months, while patients without residual tumor survived significantly longer (72 months) than patients with residual disease (12 months, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Secondary surgery of metastasized gastric cancer may be justified in selected cases without progression under induction chemotherapy. An achievable complete removal of the primary tumor and metastases appears the main selection criterion for patients benefitting from this approach.

Role of metastasectomy on overall survival of patients with metastatic gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The role of metastasectomy has been debatable and unclear in the treatment for patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the role of metastasectomy on the overall survival of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 2,406 patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 1998 and 2010, 188 (7.8%) patients had their first surgery for metastatic gastric cancer. To minimize the bias of systemic chemotherapy, 99 patients who received postoperative chemotherapy (fewer than 2 cycles) were excluded. The primary gastrectomy or metastasectomy had not been enforced in the following cases. Patients with far advanced peritoneal dissemination, multiple liver and lung metastasis (more than 2), and a poor general condition (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group>2) were excluded. Based on the metastasectomy, the patients were classified into two groups, gastrectomy with metastasectomy and gastrectomy only group.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between both groups in clinicopathological characteristics except for the mean age (P=0.047). The univariate analysis for overall survival show statistical significances in metastasectomy (P=0.026), distal gastrectomy (P=0.047), and combined resection of another organ (P=0.047) group. With a multivariate analysis, metastasectomy was a significant factor in patient survival after surgery (odds ratio 1.679; P=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, we assume that a detailed strategy for surgery is needed to improve the overall survival of patients with metastatic gastric cancer. Therefore, we suggest that a metastasectomy can help prolong overall survival in some patients with metastatic gastric cancer.

The role of non-curative surgery in incurable, asymptomatic advanced gastric cancer

Background

Although general agreement exists on palliative surgery with intent of symptom palliation in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the role of non-curative surgery for incurable, asymptomatic AGC is hotly debated. We aim to clarify the role of non-curative surgery in patients with incurable, asymptomatic AGC under the first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 737 patients with incurable, asymptomatic advanced gastric adenocarcinoma between January 2008 and May 2012 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed, comprising 414 patients with non-curative surgery plus first-line chemotherapy, and 323 patients with first-line chemotherapy only. The clinicopathologic data, survival, and prognosis were evaluated, with propensity score adjustment for selection bias.

Results

The median overall survival (OS) outcomes significantly favored non-curative surgery group over first-line chemotherapy only group in entire population (28.00 versus 10.37 months, P = 0.000), stage 4 patients (23.87 versus 10.37 months, P = 0.000), young patients (28.70 versus 10.37 months, P = 0.000) and elderly patients (23.07 versus 10.27 months, P = 0.031). The median OS advantages of non-curative surgery over first-line chemotherapy only were also maintained when the analyses were restricted to single organ metastasis (P = 0.001), distant lymph node metastasis (P = 0.002), peritoneal metastasis (P = 0.000), and multi-organ metastasis (P = 0.010). Significant OS advantages of non-curative surgery over chemotherapy only were confirmed solid by multivariate analyses before and after adjustment on propensity score (P = 0.000). Small subsets of patients with surgery of single metastatic lesion after previous curative gastrectomy, and with surgery of both primary and single metastatic sites showed sound median OS.

Conclusions

There is a role for non-curative surgery plus first-line chemotherapy for incurable, asymptomatic AGC, in terms of survival. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to fill a gap in knowledge about the value of metastectomy and patient selection strategies.

Clinical significance of palliative gastrectomy on the survival of patients with incurable advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Palliative gastrectomy for patients with advanced gastric cancer remains controversial. The objective of the present meta-analysis was to analyze survival outcomes and establish a consensus on whether palliative gastrectomy is suitable for patients with incurable advanced gastric cancer and which type of patients should be selected to receive palliative gastrectomy.

Methods

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. The results for overall survival in the meta-analysis are expressed as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Of 1647 articles and abstracts reviewed, 14 studies with 3003 patients were eligible for the final analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that palliative gastrectomy is associated with a significantly improvement in overall survival (HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.39–0.80; p < 0.002) compared that of patients treated without palliative gastrectomy. An improvement in survival was also observed in patients with stage M1 gastric cancer who received palliative gastrectomy (HR 0.62; 95%CI 0.49–0.78; p < 0.0001), especially those with peritoneal dissemination (HR = 0.76, 95%CI 0.63–0.92), liver metastasis (HR = 0.41, 95%CI 0.30–0.55), or distant lymph-node metastasis (HR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.23–0.59). Combined hepatic resection may be beneficial for patients who under palliative gastrectomy (HR 0.30; 95%CI 0.15–0.61; p = 0.0008). The overall survival of patients who underwent palliative gastrectomy combined with chemotherapy was significantly improved (HR 0.63; 95%CI 0.47–0.84; p = 0.002).

Conclusions

From the results of the meta-analysis, palliative gastrectomy for patients with incurable advanced gastric cancer may be associated with longer survival, especially for patients with stage M1 gastric cancer. Combined hepatic resection for patients with liver metastasis and chemotherapy may be beneficial factors compared to simple palliative gastrectomy.

Palliative treatment and the role of surgical resection in gastric cancer

Adenocarcinoma of the stomach is often diagnosed in the late stages of the disease. Surgical resection of all gross and microscopic disease is essential for curative treatment. Complete resection is often not achievable when patients present with advanced stage IV cancer. In the absence of symptoms, chemotherapy without resection has been the standard of care in most major centers. With improvements in response to chemotherapy and less invasive surgical approaches, patients with metastatic gastric cancer have had better survival outcomes than in the past. The challenge today when treating these patients is in defining who will benefit from more aggressive interventions. Reviewing the literature for guidance is difficult because the goals of treatment are often not clearly defined. Finding the proper balance of aggressiveness needed to extend survival while preserving and maximizing quality of life is a decision that clinicians have to make with increasing frequency. This review will attempt to provide a framework to aid in determining what role, if any, gastrectomy has in the management of patients with stage IV gastric cancer.

SPan-1 is a useful prognostic marker for patients with stage IV gastric cancer who underwent palliative gastrectomy: a retrospective multivariate study

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively investigated prognostic factors to be used in selecting the patients with stage IV gastric cancer (GC) who have an unfavorable prognosis after palliative gastrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 146 GC patients at stage IV who had undergone palliative gastrectomy were enrolled. Various clinicopathological parameters were evaluated for prognosis.

RESULTS

Surgical morbidity and hospital mortality occurred in 35 (23.9 %) and 4 (2.7 %) patients, respectively. The overall 5-year survival rate and the median survival time were 11.2 % and 13.2 months, respectively. Of the 146 patients, 64 had uncomfortable symptoms associated with GC and 76 had no such symptoms. Of the 64 patients with uncomfortable symptoms, 60 (93.7 %) experienced relief of these symptoms after palliative surgery. Multivariate analysis for patients without uncomfortable symptoms associated with GC revealed that the number of incurable factors and serum SPan-1 level were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage IV GC who had multiple incurable factors and a high level of serum SPan-1 might not be candidates for palliative gastrectomy for the purpose of prognostic benefit.

Survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

The survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy in patients with peritoneal metastasis as a single incurable factor remains unclear.

METHODS

A total of 148 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis underwent gastrectomy or chemotherapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between September 2002 and December 2008 and were included in this study. The effects of gastrectomy and chemotherapy on their long-term outcome were investigated. Multivariate analysis was also performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Gastrectomy was performed in 82 patients and subsequent chemotherapy was administered to 55. Chemotherapy was selected as an initial treatment for 66 patients. Median survival time (MST) was identical between patients with and without gastrectomy (13.1 vs. 12.0 months; P = 0.410). Conversely, MST was significantly longer in patients who received chemotherapy (13.7 months) than those who did not (7.1 months; P = 0.048). According to the results of multivariate analysis, chemotherapy (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.476; 95 % CI = 0.288-0.787) was selected as an independent prognostic factor, while gastrectomy was not.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study did not show a survival benefit of palliative gastrectomy in selected patients with peritoneal metastasis. Instead, chemotherapy has to be considered as an initial treatment for these patients.

A systematic review of surgery for non-curative gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Most gastric cancer patients present with advanced stage disease precluding curative surgical treatment. These patients may be considered for palliative resection or bypass in the presence of major symptoms; however, the utility of surgery for non-curative, asymptomatic advanced disease is debated and the appropriate treatment strategy unclear.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the non-curative surgical literature to better understand the limitations and benefits of non-curative surgery for advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

A literature search for non-curative surgical interventions in gastric cancer was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from 1 January 1985 to 1 December 2009. All abstracts were independently rated for relevance by a minimum of two reviewers. Outcomes of interest were procedure-related morbidity, mortality, and survival.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine articles were included; the majority were retrospective, single institution case series. Definitions describing the treatment intent for gastrectomy were incomplete in most studies. Only five were truly performed with relief of symptoms as the primary indication for surgery, while the majority were considered non-curative or not otherwise specified. High rates of procedure-related morbidity and mortality were demonstrated for all surgeries across the majority of studies and treatment-intent categories. Median and 1-year survival were poor, and values ranged widely within surgical approaches and across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

A lack of transparent documentation of disease burden and symptoms limits the surgical literature in non-curative gastric cancer. Improved survival is not evident for all patients receiving non-curative gastrectomy. Further prospective research is required to determine the optimal intervention for palliative gastric cancer patients.

Survival in patients with stage IV noncardia gastric cancer - the influence of DNA ploidy and Helicobacter pylori infection

Background

Palliative surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy is a challenging approach in the treatment of stage IV gastric cancer yet patients must be carefully selected on the basis of likely clinical benefit.

Methods

The records of 218 patients with histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent palliative surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve potential prognostic variables including tumour DNA index and serum IgG anti- Helicobacter pylori (HP) antibodies were evaluated for their influence on overall survival by multivariate analysis.

Results

The median survival was 13.25 months [95% Confidence Interval (CI) 12.00, 14.50]. Three factors were found to have an independent effect on survival: performance status (PS) [PS 60–70 vs. 90–100 Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.676; CI 1.171-2.398, p = 0.005], liver metastases (HR 1.745; CI 1.318-2.310, p < 0.001), and DNA Index as assessed by Image cytometry (2.2-3.6 vs. >3.6 HR 3.059; CI 2.185-4.283, p < 0.001 and <2.2 vs. >3.6 HR; 4.207 CI 2.751-6.433 <0.001). HP infection had no statistically significant effect on survival by either univariate or multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Poor pre-treatment PS, the presence of liver metastasis and high DNA Index were identified factors associated with adverse survival outcome in patients with Stage IV gastric cancer treated with palliative gastrectomy and postoperative chemotherapy. HP infection had no influence on survival of these patients.

Left-sided renal colic as a symptom of advanced stomach cancer - a case report

The typical symptoms of advanced cancer of the stomach are well known in clinical practice. The presented case concerns a patient with symptoms of left-sided renal colic, caused by a malignant tumour involving the ureter, which was diagnosed with a CT scan. The multifocal process, involving the stomach, two parts of the colon, the left ovary and the side of the pelvis, was confirmed only during surgery.

The resection or partial resection of the above-mentioned organs involved by the malignant process and reconstruction of the alimentary tract as well as the ureter were performed at time of this operation. The patient's recovery was without any complications. The histopathological findings support the diagnosis of this malignant process as disseminated stomach cancer.

In the available literature only two cases of stomach cancer metastasis to the ureter have been described. In both cited examples resection of the ureter with nephrectomy was performed. The review of the literature supports the value of stomach palliative resection in prolonging life and improving quality of life.

Does non-curative gastrectomy improve survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer?

BACKGROUND

The role of non-curative or palliative gastrectomy remains controversial. Our aim was to compare retrospective patients who have undergone non-curative gastrectomy to the patients with surgical exploration only.

METHODS

Between years 2000 and 2009, 488 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma were treated at the Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital. Fifty-five patients had metastatic disease but their symptoms were not severe enough to require palliative surgery. Thirty-two of them underwent operative exploration (Group A), and 23 non-curative gastrectomy (Group B). All operations were initiated with curative intent.

RESULTS

The difference in median survival between Groups A and B was insignificant (5.7 months in Group A and 10.8 months in Group B, P = 0.152). However, 33 patients with postoperative chemotherapy had significantly better median survival than the others (14.2 months vs. 1.9 months, P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between Groups A and B in the rate of late postoperative gastrointestinal obstruction or bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-curative gastrectomy does not improve survival in patients with metastatic gastric cancer, nor reduces the rate of late occlusions. There is no need for prophylactic palliative gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer who do not have bleeding or obstruction preoperatively. Among those patients, postoperative chemotherapy seems to improve survival.

Non-curative gastric resection for patients with stage 4 gastric cancer--a single center experience and current review of literature

PURPOSE

The majority of patients with gastric cancer present with an advanced stage and, therefore, may not be eligible for curative treatment. The role of non-curative gastric resection in situations other than emergency treatment for life threatening tumor-related complications is still under discussion.

METHODS

Data from 290 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer who were treated in our hospital were analyzed. A total of 48 patients underwent primary non-curative gastric resection.

RESULTS

The overall survival in the non-curatively resected group was 15 months and 6 months for non-resected patients, respectively (p < 0.001). The incidence of tumor-related complications which required intervention was 63% in non-resected patients as compared to 12% in patients who underwent primary non-curative resection. Younger age, less than three tumor locations, and chemotherapy have been identified as prognostic factors for improved survival by univariate analysis. D3 lymph node involvement and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Peritoneal carcinosis did not significantly influence survival in resected patients. Non-curative resection in combination with chemotherapy resulted in longer overall survival than resection alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary non-curative gastric resection can reduce the incidence of severe tumor-related complications and can prolong overall survival in selected subgroups. In particular, younger patients with no more than two tumor locations should be considered for this procedure.

Gastric adenocarcinoma surgery and adjuvant therapy

Gastric adenocarcinoma is one of the most common causes of death worldwide. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of therapy, offering the only chance for complete cure. Resection is based on the principles of obtaining adequate margins, with the extent of lymphadenectomy remaining controversial. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are used to reduce local recurrence and improve long-term survival. This article reviews the literature and provides a summary of surgical management options and neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapies for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Does primary tumor resection improve outcomes for patients with incurable advanced breast cancer?

BACKGROUND

Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is considered incurable, and surgery has only limited benefit in the treatment of this disease. However, recent reports have indicated that primary tumor resection may improve patient outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed the surgical benefits and prognostic factors for patients with MBC who were treated at our center.

METHODS

Ninety-two women, who had tumors of greater than 5 cm and distant metastasis at diagnosis, were included in this study. The effect of surgical treatment on survival was evaluated. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were also investigated.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients had surgery for resection of primary tumors. There were no substantive differences between individuals, or between tumor characteristics, for patients who underwent surgery versus patients who did not. The median survival time for surgically treated patients was 25.0 months versus 24.8 months for patients who did not undergo surgical resection (P=0.352). Only three patients relapsed within three months of surgery. For the remaining majority of patients, primary tumor resection gave some relief from the often severe symptoms that come from harboring a large tumor for an extended time. In univariate and subsequent multivariate analyses of predictive indicators, a diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer and/or metastasis to more than three sites was significantly associated with a severe prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Primary tumor resection failed to prolong overall survival times in patients with incurable advanced breast cancer that was greater than 5 cm. However, surgery did improve the quality of life in patients who were expected to have a relatively long prognosis.

Outcome of palliative total gastrectomy for stage IV proximal gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A few studies have investigated the outcome of palliative total gastrectomy (PTG) in stage IV proximal gastric cancer. In this study, we tried to summarize the outcome of PTG in stage IV proximal gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between January 1991 and January 2005, complete clinical data of 197 patients with stage IV proximal gastric cancer undergoing PTG, 642 patients undergoing curative total gastrectomy (CTG), 152 nonsurgical patients, 102 patients undergoing explorative laparotomy, and 78 patients undergoing jejunostomy were enrolled in this study. Survival rates, median survival, complication rates, and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates were 61.3%, 8.9%, and 6.4% in the PTG group, respectively, and 92.3%, 58.5%, and 48.9% in the CTG group, respectively (P < .05). The median survival periods in the PTG, no surgery, laparotomy, and jejunostomy groups were 16.4, 5.5, 4.7, and 5.8 months, respectively. The median survival in the PTG group was significantly longer than that in the other 3 groups (P < .05). The postoperative complication rate and mortality rate were, respectively, 24.3% and 3.0% in the PTG group and 13.5% and 2.3% in the CTG group (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

PTG for stage IV proximal gastric cancer when compared with no surgery, laparotomy, and jejunostomy is associated with prolonged survival time and improved quality of life. However, despite the feasibility and safety of PTG, patients with stage IV proximal gastric cancer who are suitable for this treatment should be selected, and thoughtful preparation should be made in the perioperative period.

Survival benefit of gastrectomy ± metastasectomy in patients with metastatic gastric cancer receiving chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to investigate the role of surgery in patients with gastric cancer and distant metastases who had received systemic chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with newly diagnosed gastric cancer and synchronous distant metastases who had received chemotherapy (n = 274) were categorized into 3 groups according to the surgical treatment rendered: complete gross resection of both primary and metastatic sites (group A; n = 42); debulking gastrectomy (group B; n = 47); and chemotherapy without debulking (group C; n = 185).

RESULTS

The median overall survival of all patients was 11.8 months. The median overall survival and 3-year survival rates were 28.0, 15.5, and 9.0 months and 42.8, 8.1, and 3.5% in groups A, B, and C, respectively. In group A, patients with peritoneal seeding, intra-abdominal distant lymph nodes, or ovarian or hepatic metastases underwent complete gross resection, and 12 (29%) were disease-free at the time of the last analysis (median follow-up duration, 29.1 months). On multivariate analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios for death were 0.27 (P < 0.001) and 0.64 (P = 0.024) for groups A and B, respectively, as compared to group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests survival benefits of debulking gastrectomy or gastrectomy plus metastasectomy in gastric cancer patients with distant metastases receiving systemic chemotherapy. Prolonged disease-free survival was observed after complete resection (gastrectomy plus metastasectomy) that may lead to cure in some patients. Well-designed prospective trials of the role of multidisciplinary approaches combining chemotherapy and surgery are needed to confirm the observations of our study.

Palliative gastrectomy and other factors affecting overall survival in stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma patients receiving chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Most patients with gastric cancer present with locally advanced or metastatic disease and usually receive palliative therapy. We sought to identify factors influencing overall survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The records of 311 patients with histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed and 17 clinicopathological and therapeutic parameters were evaluated for their influence on overall survival.

RESULTS

In multivariate analysis nine factors were found to independently influence survival: no previous palliative gastrectomy [Hazard ratio (HR, 12; CI 7.969-18.099)], single agent chemotherapy instead of combination chemotherapy (HR, 1.35; CI 1.068-1.721), histological grade III (HR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.098-1.782), the presence of hepatic (HR, 1.6; 95% CI 1.246-2.073) and abdominal metastasis (HR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.039-1.715), CA 72-4 > 7 U/L (HR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.026-1.887), LDH > 225 U/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI 1.336-2.236], need for blood transfusions (HR, 1.58; 95% CI 1.213-2.082), and weight loss > 5% (HR, 1.96; 95% CI 1.352-2.853) at the time of initial diagnosis. Patients were stratified as low (0-2 factors), intermediate (3-6 factors) and high (7-9 factors) risk and the median survival was 76, 40 and 11 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nine clinical and laboratory factors that adversely affect survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy were identified. Their concurrent presence seems to have an additive effect as patients with seven to nine factors have the worse prognosis. Palliative gastrectomy and combination chemotherapy appear to be associated with improved survival.

Potential benefit of resection for stage IV gastric cancer: a national survey

INTRODUCTION

Controversy exists as to whether patients with stage IV gastric cancer should undergo surgical resection. We examined the association of gastrectomy with survival in this population.

METHODS

Stage IV gastric cancer diagnoses were identified using the SEER database (1988-2005). Analyses examined three subgroups divided on the basis of whether cancer-directed surgery was recommended and performed. Univariate analyses included chi-square and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed to assess independent determinants of survival.

RESULTS

Of 66,751 identified gastric cancer patients, 23,830 had stage IV disease. Resected patients had a significant survival advantage; survival outcomes of patients who had been recommended for, but had not undergone, surgery were identical to that of patients who had not been recommended (3 months vs. 9 months for resected, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, resection status was the most significant independent predictor of increased risk of death (hazard ratios 2.0 for non-cancer-directed surgery groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with stage IV gastric cancer who undergo resection, a highly selected population, have significantly greater survival than unresected patients, including those who were recommended for, but did not receive, resection. Stage IV gastric cancer patients who are reasonable operative candidates should be offered resection.

Palliative resection in noncurative gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Palliative resection for noncurable gastric cancer remains controversial, especially in the elderly. This retrospective study was designed to elucidate the clinicopathological factors and operative outcome in patients undergoing palliative gastric resection.

METHODS

From January 1988 to December 2008, 365 patients received palliative gastrectomy while 151 underwent exploratory laparotomy or gastrojejunostomy for noncurative gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital. Among the 365 patients, 182 patients (Group A) were aged 70 or less and 183 patients (Group B) were older than 70 years of age. Clinicopathological characteristics and surgical morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall survival of patients who underwent resection was 10.2 months and that of patients without resection 4.48 months (p < 0.001). Compared to Group B, Group A patients were predominantly female (p < 0.001), had more advanced Borrmann-type tumors (p = 0.004), more diffuse type of Lauren classification (p < 0.001), and poorer cell differentiation (p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 10.5 months in Group A and 9.7 months in Group B (p = 0.854). The surgical morbidity was significant higher if the patients had comorbidity (p = 0.028). Both surgical morbidity (13.8% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.028) and mortality (0.5% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.0001) were significantly higher in Group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cancer is less aggressive in the elderly. Palliative gastrectomy can be performed in both younger and older patients, but younger patients tolerate surgery better. More attention should be paid to the perioperative care of the elderly.

Prognosis of pN3 stage gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the prognosis of pN3 stage gastric cancer patients after they have undergone curative resection, and we also wanted to identify the prognostic factors according to the clinico-pathologic features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and December 2004, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients with histologically confirmed pN3 stage gastric cancer. They underwent both gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy with a curative aim. We categorized the pN3 stage patients into 2 groups; one with pN3 only (pN3M0) and the other with pN3 combined with M1 stage (pN3M1) that included peritoneal seeding, hepatic metastasis or para-aortic LN metastasis.

RESULTS

Out of 467 patients with stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma who received surgery, 260 patients underwent curative resection and they were pathologically staged as N3. Among these 260 patients, 78 patients were classified as the pN3/M1 stage. For all the patients, the median follow-up period was 19 months (range: 1~108 months) and the median overall survival time was 16.2 months (95% CI, 14.1~18.3%). The 5-year survival rate of the pN3/M0 group was significantly higher than that of the pN3/M1 group (12.6% vs. 2.6%, respectively, p<0.0001). The identified predictor for a worse prognosis was an advanced T4 stage (HR: 3.38, 95% CI, 1.4~8.3, p=0.008) for the pN3 patients.

CONCLUSION

The survival for the pN3 gastric cancer patients after curative gastrectomy was significantly longer in the pN3/M0 group as compared to that of the pN3/M1 group. An advanced T stage was a predictor for a poor prognosis for the pN3 patients. Therefore, diverse treatment strategies for these heterogeneous pN3 gastric cancer patients are needed for improving their survival.