Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients: clinicopathological, prognostic factors and treatments

Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in older patients with advanced gastric cancer: the Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) GI-1601 study

BACKGROUND

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) is a standard treatment option for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). We conducted a prospective multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CapeOX as a first-line therapy for AGC in older patients.

METHODS

Chemotherapy-naive patients aged ≥ 70 years with AGC were eligible. Initial treatment comprised capecitabine (2000 mg/m2 on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. After the initial feasibility assessment, the dose was reduced considering toxicity (capecitabine, 1500 mg/m2 on days 1-14; and oxaliplatin, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 108 patients were enrolled, of whom 104 were evaluated. Thirty-nine patients received the original-dose treatment, whereas 65 received the reduced-dose treatment. The median OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and time to treatment failure (TTF) were 12.9 (95% CI 11.6-14.8), 5.7 (95% CI 5.0-7.0), and 4.3 (95% CI 3.9-5.7) months, respectively, for all patients; 13.4 (95% CI 9.5-16.0), 5.8 (95% CI 4.1-7.8), and 5.3 (95% CI 3.5-7.2) months in the original-dose group; and 12.8 (95% CI 11.3-15.3), 5.7 (95% CI 4.4-7.0), and 4.1 (95% CI 3.7-5.7) months in the reduced-dose group. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (17.9%), anemia (12.8%), and thrombocytopenia (12.8%) in the original-dose group and neutropenia (13.8%) and anorexia (12.3%) in the reduced-dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate CapeOX's efficacy and safety in older AGC patients.

The clinical position of ramucirumab-containing regimens for advanced gastric cancer: a review of clinical trial data

Despite the availability of multiple treatment options, the prognosis for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains poor and more effective treatment options are needed. Ramucirumab is an established and recommended second-line treatment for AGC. In recently completed and ongoing clinical trials, ramucirumab has been investigated in combination with new therapeutics and in new clinical settings to address the unmet treatment needs of AGC. In this review, the findings of recent clinical trials are discussed. The aims of this review are to present the current picture of ramucirumab-containing regimens in AGC and offer practical guidance on the clinical position and target populations of ramucirumab-containing regimens in light of emerging therapeutic developments.

Real-World Therapeutic Outcomes of S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy for pStage II/III Gastric Cancer in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

The predictive factors for discontinuation of S-1 administration and prognostic factors in elderly patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer receiving S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2016, 80 elderly gastric cancer patients (≥70 years) undergoing curative D2 gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. Predictive factors for completion of S-1 administration over 1 year, adverse events due to S-1 administration, and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (35%) completed 8 courses of S-1. The median relative dose intensity was 82.1% (IQR 31.1-100%). The incidence rates of hematological and nonhematological adverse events were acceptable. Distal gastrectomy was an independent predictive factor for completion of S-1 administration (odds ratio [OR] 0.364; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.141-0.939; p = 0.037). Higher postoperative neutrophil count/lymphocyte count (N/L) ratio and more advanced stage adversely influenced OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that a higher postoperative N/L ratio and more advanced stage adversely affected RFS.

CONCLUSION

To complete adjuvant S-1 administration to elderly patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer, total gastrectomy should be avoided if possible. A new regimen for elderly gastric cancer patients with higher postoperative N/L ratios and more advanced stage should be established.

A cohort study and meta-analysis of the evidence for consideration of Lauren subtype when prescribing adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Background

The association between the survival or efficacy of chemotherapy and the Lauren subtype of gastric cancer (GC) remains unclear. We aimed to clarify whether patients with different Lauren subtypes have different survival after treatment with systemic chemotherapy: intestinal gastric cancer (IGC) patients survived better than patients with mixed type gastric cancer (MGC) or diffuse gastric cancer (DGC) after treatment with systemic chemotherapy.

Patients & methods

Relevant studies for the meta-analysis were identified through searching Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and Ovid up to March 2020. We also included our own prospectively collected cohort of patients that were followed over a 10-year period. Sub-group and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

Results

In our prospective cohort, the overall survival (OS) of IGC patients receiving systemic chemotherapy (chemoIGC) [median OS 5.01 years, interquartile range (IQR) 2.63-6.71] was significantly higher than that of DGC patients receiving the same chemotherapy (chemoDGC) (median OS 1.33 years, IQR 0.78-3.33, p = 0.0001). After adjusting for age, gender and cancer stage, there was a significant difference in OS in patients treated with chemotherapy based on the Lauren classification of GC {hazard ratio (HR) for OS of the IGC versus DGC 0.33, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.65; p < 0.001]}. In the IGC patients, the adjusted HR associated with chemotherapy was 0.26 (95% CI, 0.12-0.56; p = 0.001), whereas the association was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.30-1.33; p = 0.23) in the DGC patient group.In our meta-analysis, 33 studies comprising 10,246 patients treated with systemic chemotherapy (chemoIGC n = 4888, chemoDGC n = 5358) met all the selection criteria. While we accounted for much of the heterogeneity in these studies, we found that chemoIGC patients showed significantly improved OS [HR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.82); p < 0.00001] when compared with similarly treated chemoDGC patients.

Conclusion

Our results support the consideration of Lauren subtype when prescribing systemic chemotherapy for GC, particularly for MGC or DGC, which may not benefit from chemotherapy. Lauren classification should be considered to stratify chemotherapy regimens to GC patients in future clinical trials, with particular relevance to MGC or DGC, which is more difficult to treat with current regimens.

Combination versus single-agent as palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Although combination chemotherapy (CC) is generally recommended in recurrent or primary metastatic gastric cancer (RPMGC), the results of randomized trials are conflicting.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 687 RPMGC patients who received palliative chemotherapy. We compared the overall survival (OS) between CC and single-agent chemotherapy (SC) among these patients, and we analyzed the clinicopathological characteristics affecting outcome including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).

RESULTS

Although 521 patients (75.8%) underwent CC, SC was more frequently performed in elderly patients (57.6%) and ECOG performance status (PS) 2 or 3 (65.8%) patients (p < 0.0001, in each case). The median OS of patients who received CC was significantly longer than that of patients who received SC (11 vs. 8 months, p < 0.0001). No difference in OS between CC and SC was observed in elderly patients (p = 0.583), poor PS (p = 0.810), signet ring cell (p = 0.347), palliative surgical resection (p = 0.307), and high PLR (p = 0.120), with a significant interaction between age and type of regimen (p = 0.012). Moreover, there was no difference in OS between CC and SC after propensity score matching (p = 0.322). Multivariate analysis revealed that palliative resection and ≥ second-line chemotherapy were independently associated with favorable OS (p < 0.0001, in each case), whereas poor PS (p = 0.004), signet ring cell (p < 0.0001), peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.04), high NLR (p = 0.001), and high PLR (p = 0.033) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CC is the standard of care in RPMGC, SC can be considered a reasonable option in certain subgroups, such as elderly patients.

Achieving sequential therapy in advanced gastric cancer: the importance of appropriate patient management for the elderly and/or those with ascites

Treatment options for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) are limited. One approach to improving survival in patients with AGC is to optimize the available agents via sequential therapy. However, clinical trial reports of first-line chemotherapy indicate that elderly patients and patients with massive ascites are less likely to receive subsequent lines of therapy. In addition, clinical trials of second- and third-line chemotherapy generally exclude these two patient populations because they are likely to have poor performance status and additional issues that are difficult to manage. Good patient management is likely to be key to the successful use of sequential therapy in these two patient populations by minimizing adverse effects to allow patients to derive benefit from the additional treatment. This narrative review summarizes the available information on AGC treatment and patient management in elderly patients and patients with massive ascites. The available data suggest that elderly patients benefit from chemotherapy; however, monitoring toxicity is essential to avoid chemotherapy-related toxicities. Important aspects of patient management for elderly patients include symptom monitoring, nutritional support, and fall prevention. The available data for patients with massive ascites show limited success for a range of treatment approaches, including systemic chemotherapy. The management of ascites is also challenging, with no clear guidance on the preferred strategies. To address these gaps in knowledge, future clinical trials should incorporate more inclusive eligibility criteria to enroll populations of patients with AGC that are more reflective of the real-world population with respect to age, complications, and overall health status.

Efficacy of chemotherapy for older patients with gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of malignant disease-related mortality, worldwide. With the use of recently developed anti-tumor agents, the prognoses of patients with unresectable gastric cancer are improving. However, the development of an aggressive treatment strategy for older patients (OPs) remains under debate due to concerns regarding treatment feasibility or patient frailty. We aimed to elucidate whether aggressive chemotherapy has survival benefits for OPs with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive patients diagnosed with inoperable advanced gastric cancer across seven hospitals from August 2007 to July 2015. We defined OPs as patients aged 75 years or older and compared their survival rates with those of non-older patients (NPs).

RESULTS

A total of 256 OPs and 425 NPs were enrolled. Of the OPs, 152 patients received chemotherapy and 104 patients received best supportive care (BSC). In contrast, among the NPs, 375 patients received chemotherapy and 50 patients received BSC. There was no significant difference of the median survival time between OPs and NPs in the response to BSC (61 vs 43 days) or chemotherapy (312 vs 348 days). Combination chemotherapy significantly improved survival compared to monotherapy in both OPs and NPs groups (382 vs 253 days in OPs, 381 vs 209 days in NPs). Good performance status, combination therapy, and male, but not age, were significant independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

When the performance status of a gastric cancer patient is good, active chemotherapy may improve survival, regardless of age.

First-line chemotherapy with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND

Fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination is the standard treatment for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). However, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is commonly used for elderly patients with AGC because of its good tolerability.

METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study, we collected clinical data of AGC patients aged 70 years or older, treated with S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) as the first-line treatment between January 2009 and December 2011. Propensity score matched cohorts (PSMC) were used for reducing the confounding effects to compare efficacy and safety between the two treatment groups. Cox regression analysis was performed to clarify the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

PSMC (n = 109 in each group) were selected from among 444 eligible patients (S-1 group, 210; SP group, 234); the S-1 group included more patients deemed unfit for intensive chemotherapy than the SP group (e.g., higher age, poorer PS, poor renal function). In the PSMC, patients' characteristics were comparable between groups, except the male ratio (S-1 group, 64.2%; SP group, 77.1%; p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in either overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, p = 0.63] or progression-free survival (HR 1.09, p = 0.61). Severe adverse events (AEs) and hospitalization due to AEs were more frequent in the SP group than in the S-1 group (p < 0.001 each).

CONCLUSION

Our findings do not support the survival benefit of SP over S-1 in elderly patients with AGC. We are now conducting a prospective comparative study to optimize treatment strategy and explore applicability of the geriatric assessment for these patients.

Phase II trial of S-1 plus leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer and clinical prediction by S-1 pharmacogenetic pathway

Background

The first one-arm phase II trial aimed to evaluate and predict efficacy and safety of S-1 plus oral leucovorin (S-1/LV) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC), using S-1 pharmacogenetic pathway approach.

Patients and methods

A total of 39 patients orally took S-1 at conventional dose and LV simultaneously at a dose of 25 mg twice daily for a week, within a 2-week cycle. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR), while the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), time to failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). Peripheral blood was sampled prospectively for baseline expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), thymidine phosphorylase (TP), and thymidylate synthase (TS), CYP2A6 gene polymorphisms, and 5-FU pharmacokinetics.

Results

The ORR and DCR were 41.0 and 76.9%. The median PFS, TTF, and OS were 4.13, 3.70, and 11.40 months. Grade 3–4 AEs occurred in only 13 patients, and grade 4 AEs occurred in only 1 of them. High OPRT/TS and peritoneal metastasis (vs. liver metastasis) independently predicted responding. High OPRT/DPD independently predicted grade 3–4 AEs. High AUC_0–24h of 5-FU and metastatic/recurrent sites ≤2 (vs. >3) independently predicted prolonged PFS. Low baseline plasmic DPD independently predicted prolonged OS.

Conclusions

Two-week, oral S-1/LV regimen demonstrated promising efficacy and safety as first-line chemotherapy for AGC.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT02090153

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-016-3209-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy and safety of S-1 and oxaliplatin combination therapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

A randomized phase III study of Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer, the G-SOX trial, revealed that S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) combination therapy was noninferior to S-1 and cisplatin (CS) combination therapy. However, it is unclear whether the efficacy and safety in elderly patients were different between the two regimens.

METHODS

A total of 685 patients registered in the G-SOX trial were classified as elderly (70 years or older) or not elderly (younger than 70 years), and 663 patients (SOX therapy, elderly 113 of 333 patients, 34 %; CS therapy, elderly 99 of 330 patients, 30 %) and 673 patients (SOX therapy, elderly 114 of 338 patients, 34 %; CS therapy, elderly 101 of 335 patients, 30 %) were analyzed for efficacy and safety, respectively. Treatment delivery of SOX was also compared between elderly and nonelderly groups.

RESULTS

No differences in efficacy were identified between the elderly and nonelderly groups for either regimen. In the elderly groups, SOX therapy showed better trends in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.805, 95 % confidence interval 0.588-1.102) and overall survival (hazard ratio 0.857, 95 % confidence interval 0.629-1.167) compared with CS therapy, although there were no significant differences. Grade 3 or worse adverse events were less frequent in the elderly group receiving SOX than in the elderly group receiving CS except for the low incidence of sensory neuropathy (5.3 % vs 0 %), neutropenia (25.4 % vs 42.6 %), anemia (21.1 % vs 42.6 %), febrile neutropenia (1.8 % vs 10.9 %), increased creatinine level (0.9 % vs 3.0 %), and hyponatremia (7.9 % vs 18.8 %).

CONCLUSIONS

SOX is an effective and feasible therapy in both nonelderly and elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. In elderly patients, SOX demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety compared with CS.

Outcomes in elderly patients treated with a single-agent or combination regimen as first-line chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Palliative chemotherapy is used to prolong survival among elderly patients with inoperable gastric cancer (GC). We analyzed differences between single and combination first-line palliative chemotherapy among these patients.

METHODS

Included patients were >70 years old and were treated for GC at four clinical centers of the Catholic University of Korea. Baseline characteristics, the first-line chemotherapy regimen, treatment responses, toxicities, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Between 2005 and 2012, 178 > 70-year-old patients with GC received palliative chemotherapy using single or combination regimens. Median ages were 77 years (range 71-89) in the single regimen group (SG, 70 patients) and 73 years (range 71-81) in the combination group (CG, 108 patients). Patients in the SG received S-1 or capecitabine. The most common regimen in the CG was platinum combined with fluorouracil. The most common response in both groups was stable disease (SG, 45.7 %; CG, 48.1 %). In the SG and CG, median PFS times were 4.4 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.85-5.95) and 4.1 months (95 % CI 2.62-5.57; P = 0.295), respectively; median OS times were 6.6 months (95 % CI 4.17-9.08) and 7.6 months (95 % CI 5.50-9.69; P = 0.782), respectively. Hematologic (P < 0.001) and non-hematologic toxicities (P < 0.001) were more frequent in the CG. The most common causes of chemotherapy cessation were disease progression in the SG and decreased performance status in the CG.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-agent treatment should be considered a first-line palliative chemotherapy option for elderly patients with GC.

Value of computed tomography with multi-direction adjusting multi-planar reformation in differential diagnosis between Borrmann types Ⅱ and Ⅲ gastric cancer

AIM: To evaluate the value of computed tomography (CT) with multi-direction adjusting multi-planar reformation (MPR) in the differential diagnosis between Borrmann types Ⅱ and Ⅲ gastric cancer.

METHODS: Eighty patients with pathologically proven gastric cancer underwent contrast enhanced CT examinations, and all the images were reconstructed by multi-direction adjusting MPR and normal reformation. The diagnostic results by the two construction methods were compared with the pathology as the gold standard, and the consistency and accuracy were analyzed by the Chi-square test.

RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 33 had Borrmann type Ⅱ disease and 47 had Borrmann type Ⅲ. The value of Kappa and accuracy of multi-direction adjusting MPR in the differential diagnosis between Borrmann types Ⅱ and Ⅲ gastric cancer were 0.77 and 88.8%, respectively, which were higher than those of the normal reformation. Borrmann type Ⅱ gastric cancer was diagnosed more easily than type Ⅲ.

CONCLUSION: The accuracy of multi-direction adjusting MPR in the differential diagnosis between Borrmann types Ⅱ and Ⅲ gastric cancer is higher than the normal reformation and is close to pathology.