Is there a role for adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological complete response rectal cancer tumors following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy?J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:1489-1494. [PMID: 24849731 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1712-5]

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after pathological complete response in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 31,558 patients

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) typically involves neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery (total mesorectal excision, TME). While achieving a complete pathological response (pCR) is a strong indicator of a positive prognosis, the specific benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy after pCR remain unclear. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the potential advantages of adjuvant therapy in patients who achieve pCR.

METHODS

In this study, we searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant research. We focused on binary outcomes, analyzing them using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To account for potential variability between studies, all endpoints were analyzed with DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. We assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic and employed the R statistical software (version 4.2.3) for all analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies, comprising 31,558 patients, were included. The outcomes demonstrated a significant difference favoring the AC group in terms of overall survival (OS) (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94; p = 0.015; I2 = 0%), and OS in 5 years (OR 1.65; 95% CI 1.21-2.24; p = 0.001; I2 = 39%). There was no significant difference between the groups for disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.76-1.17; p = 0.61; I2 = 17%), DFS in 5 years (OR 1.19; 95% CI 0.82-1.74; p = 0.36; I2 = 43%), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR 1.10; 95% CI 0.87-1.40; p = 0.39; I2 = 0%), and relapse-free survival (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.78-1.51; p = 0.62; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis found a significant difference in favor of the ACT group in terms of survival after pCR. Therefore, the administration of this treatment as adjuvant therapy should be encouraged in clinical practice.

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcome of rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal cancer is typically treated using a combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal resection. While achieving pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been recognized as a positive prognostic factor in oncology, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after surgery remains uncertain. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcomes of rectal cancer patients who attain pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

This meta-analysis followed the guidelines outlined in the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). The Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature.

RESULTS

A total of 34 retrospective studies, including 9 studies from the NCBD database, involving 31,558 patients with pathological complete response rectal cancer, were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2023. The pooled analysis demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.803, 95% CI 0.678-0.952, P = 0.011), and no heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 0%). Locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a higher 5-year overall survival rate compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.605, 95% CI 1.183-2.177, P = 0.002). However, the analysis also revealed that postoperative ACT did not lead to improvements in disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival within the same patient population. Subgroup analysis indicated that pathological complete response patients with clinical stage T3/T4, lymph node positivity, and younger than 70 years of age may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a beneficial effect on improving overall survival among rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response. However, no such association was observed in terms of disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival.

Clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological complete response rectal cancer patients with acellular mucin pools after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

Approximately 15-30% of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients achieved pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision, but the clinical significance of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for pCR patients remains unclear.

Objectives

To determine whether LARC pCR patients can benefit from the administration of ACT.

Design

Single center retrospective study.

Methods

This study retrospectively included 280 LARC patients who achieved pCR after CRT and surgery from 2011 to 2019. The information of patients was recorded. Main outcome measures included 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival. Subgroup analysis was conducted on whether pCR patients with acellular mucin pools received ACT or not.

Results

A total of 74/280 (26.4%) patients were identified with acellular mucin pools. Disease recurrence occurred in 38/280 (13.6%) patients, and in the subgroup of patients with acellular mucin pools, 15/74 (20.3%) patients developed distant metastases. The existence of acellular mucin pools was associated with worse DFS (79.7% versus 88.8%, P = 0.037). Among pCR patients with acellular mucin pools, 9/25 (36.0%) of non-ACT patients occurred recurrence, and ACT was beneficial for improving DFS (hazard ratio: 0.245; 95% confidence interval: 0.084-0.719; P = 0.010).

Conclusions

The existence of acellular mucin pools may represent a sign of invasive tumor biology, which indicated a negative prognosis. ACT can improve the prognosis of patient with acellular mucin pools, so ACT should be considered for them.

Oncologic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection: An international retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Intensive local treatment comprising total mesorectal excision (TME) with selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has received attention among clinicians treating rectal cancer. It remains unclear whether adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after intensive local treatment is beneficial for these patients. We evaluated the oncologic benefit of ACT for patients with LARC who received intensive local treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This international multicentre retrospective cohort study included 737 patients treated in Japan and Korea between 2010 and 2017. The effectiveness of ACT on recurrence-free survival (RFS) was evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, with subgroup analyses to identify subpopulations potentially benefiting from ACT.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 49 months; the 5-year RFS and local recurrence rates for the entire cohort were 72.1% and 4.9%, respectively; 514 patients (69.7%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, without an oncologic benefit (hazard ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79-1.68) demonstrated in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. In subgroup analyses, the distributions of the 95% CI in patients aged ≥70 years and those with ypStage 0 tended to place a disproportionate emphasis that favoured the non-ACT treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

Despite achieving good local control with intensive local treatment strategy, the effectiveness of ACT for the LARC patients with CRT followed by TME with selective LPND was not proved. Elderly patients and those with ypStage0 may not receive benefit from ACT after CRT and TME ± LPND.

Evaluating the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ypT0–1 rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACTx) is recommended in rectal cancer patients after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT), but its efficacy in patients in the early post-surgical stage who have a favorable prognosis is controversial.

AIM

To evaluate the long-term survival benefit of ACTx in patients with ypT0–1 rectal cancer after PCRT and surgical resection.

METHODS

We identified rectal cancer patients who underwent PCRT followed by surgical resection at the Asan Medical Center from 2005 to 2014. Patients with ypT0–1 disease and those who received ACTx were included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed according to the status of the ACTx.

RESULTS

Of 520 included patients, 413 received ACTx (ACTx group) and 107 did not (no ACTx group). No significant difference was observed in 5-year RFS (ACTx group, 87.9% vs no ACTx group, 91.4%, P = 0.457) and 5-year OS (ACTx group, 90.5% vs no ACTx group, 86.2%, P = 0.304) between the groups. cT stage was associated with RFS and OS in multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR): 2.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07–6.16, P = 0.04 and HR: 2.27, 95%CI: 1.09–4.74, P = 0.03, respectively]. Furthermore, ypN stage was associated with RFS and OS (HR: 4.74, 95%CI: 2.39–9.42, P < 0.00 and HR: 4.33, 95%CI: 2.20–8.53, P < 0.00, respectively), but only in the radical resection group.

CONCLUSION

Oncological outcomes of patients with ypT0–1 rectal cancer who received ACTx after PCRT showed no improvement, regardless of the radicality of resection. Further trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of ACTx in these group of patients.

Current evidence regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients with pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in rectal cancer patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and curative resection.

METHODS

This study was completed in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The electronic scholar databases (Medline, Web of Science, Scopus) were screened for eligible articles. The level of evidence (LoE) was assessed using the GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Overall, 23 non-randomized studies and 17,406 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. Pooled comparisons confirmed that AC improved overall survival (HR: 0.68, p=0.0003), but not disease-free (p=0.22) and recurrence-free survival (p=0.39). However, the LoE for all outcomes was characterized as "very low," due to the absence of RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the study limitations and the lack of randomized studies, further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm the findings of our study.

Postoperative Adjuvant Treatment Strategy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment

Background

Neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy is used as a standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), but there is no general consensus on either the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with LARC after neoadjuvant treatment and surgery, or whether the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant chemotherapy provides survival benefits.

Methods

We performed a meta-analysis of data from the PubMed and Embase databases. We included patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy and curative surgery. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), toxicity, and compliance were analyzed in the oxaliplatin/fluorouracil- (OX/FU-) based group compared with the FU-based group, and in the chemotherapy group compared with the observation group.

Results

Twenty studies were included in the analysis. Our results indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy prolonged OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78, 95%CI = 0.67–0.91) in patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy and surgery compared with those in the observation group. Subgroup analysis showed the same results in both the ypStage II and ypStage III groups. Compared with those in the observation group, patients in the chemotherapy group also showed an increase in DFS (HR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.60–0.93). No significant increase was observed in OS (HR = 1.04, 95%CI = 0.87–1.24) or DFS (HR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.76–1.27) when oxaliplatin was added to FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy, as compared with the FU-based treatment, and subgroup analysis also indicated no survival benefits in the clinical stage II, clinical stage III, ypStage II, and ypStage III groups.

Conclusions

For patients with LARC who have already received neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy and curative surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy improves OS over that in the observation group. Adding oxaliplatin to FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy does not confer survival benefits beyond those from FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Oncologic effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery: a meta-analysis

Purpose

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and curative surgery is uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis using selected studies to compare adjuvant chemotherapy with observation for this cohort of patients.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Data were pooled, and overall effect size was calculated using random effect models. Outcome measures were 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local, and distant recurrence.

Results

We included 17 nonrandomized studies for qualitative analysis and 16 nonrandomized studies that examined 4,747 patients for the meta-analysis. In analysis of patients with ypT0N0 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy had no significant effect on OS (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–2.72; I² = 27%), DFS (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.61–2.42; I² = 5%), local recurrence (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.08–7.37; I² = 0%), and distant recurrence (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.41–2.62; I² = 0%). In analysis of patients with ypT1–2N0 rectal cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy also had no significant effect on OS (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.59–7.80; I² = 26%), DFS (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 0.35–7.85; I² = 44%), local recurrence (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 0.72–9.13; I² = 0%), and distant recurrence (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.23–5.87; I² = 0%).

Conclusion

Adjuvant chemotherapy may have no oncologic benefits in patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after nCRT and radical surgery. Routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for those patients may be avoided.

Rectal cancer patients with downstaging after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical resection do not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Whether adjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial for rectal cancer patients who respond well to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and undergo radical resection is controversial. This study aimed to assess the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcomes of ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer patients after NCRT and radical resection, and identify the prognostic factors.

METHODS

The clinical and pathological data of rectal cancer patients with ypT0-2N0 who underwent NCRT and radical resection between January, 2010 and June, 2018 were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The oncological outcomes of the chemotherapy (chemo) group and the non-chemotherapy (non-chemo) group were compared. Multivariate analysis, using a Cox proportional hazard model, was performed to identify independent predictors of oncological outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 121 rectal cancer patients enrolled, 90 patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with no fewer than 3 cycles (the chemo group), and the other 31 patients with fewer than 3 cycles (the non-chemo group). There was no significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) rates between the two groups (DFS: 79.1% vs. 82.9%, P=0.442; OS: 87.5% vs. 78.2%, P=0.667). cT4 is an independent risk factor for OS (HR =4.227, 95% CI: 1.128-15.838, P=0.02) and DFS (HR =4.878, 95% CI: 1.752-13.578). Preoperative consolidation chemotherapy with Capeox or FOLFOX after NCRT significantly improved the DFS rate (HR =0.212, 95% CI: 0.058-0.776, P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal cancer patients with ypT0-2N0 who underwent NCRT and radical resection did not benefit significantly from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. For these patients, cT4 was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS. Preoperative consolidation chemotherapy with Capeox or FOLFOX after NCRT can significantly improve DFS.

Prognostic impact of acellular mucin pools towards the patients with locally advanced rectal cancer achieving pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

To date, the prognostic significance of acellular mucin pools in tumors from patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and subsequently obtaining pathological complete response (pCR) has not been well determined. Our current study aimed to explore the prognostic impact on these patients of acellular mucin pools.

METHODS

We collected clinical data from 117 consecutive LARC patients who achieved pCR after preoperative CRT and then underwent radical resection. Two groups of patients were generated, according to the presence or absence of acellular mucin pools. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared between the two groups of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 27 (23.1%) patients presented with acellular mucin pools. At a median follow-up period of 64 months, patients with acellular mucin pool showed a 5-year DFS rate (96.3% versus 83.7%, p = 0.110) and 5-year OS rate (100% versus 87.5%, p = 0.054) statistically similar to those of patients without acellular mucin pools. In univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses, the presence of acellular mucin pools was not determined as an independent risk factor for DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.222; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.029-1.864; p = 0.145] or OS (HR: 0.033; 95% CI: 0.000-9.620; p = 0.238).

CONCLUSIONS

Acellular mucin pools had no significant prognostic impact on LARC patients showing pCR after preoperative CRT.

Comparison of long course and short course preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

rectal cancer (RC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and different preoperative radiotherapies may lead to different outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of long-course (LC) and short-course radiotherapy (SC), with or without chemotherapy, for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

studies published up to March 31st 2018 were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and EMABSE. Randomized control or consort control trials that reported the outcomes of short or long course radiotherapy were eligible. Either a fixed or random effects model was used to access the overall combined risk estimates.

RESULTS

sixteen studies with a total of 2,773 RC patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between LC and SC therapies with regard to the following: pathological complete response (PCR) (I2 = 78%, p < 0.05, RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.26-1.10); tumor downstaging (I2 = 79%, p < 0.05, RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.17); local recurrences (I2 = 22%, p = 0.27, RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.26-1.16); distant metastases (I2 = 29%, p = 0.22, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.77-1.37); mortality (I2 = 0%, p = 0.78, RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.78-1.15) and serious late toxicity (I2 = 74%, p = 0.01, RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.37-3.26). In the subgroup analysis, LC had a better PCR and tumor downstaging rate compared with SC in the RCT subgroup. Besides, LC also presented a better PCR rate compared with SC without chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LC and SC are both effective in the preoperative treatment of RC with regard to PCR, tumor downstaging, local recurrences, distant metastases, mortality and serious late toxicity. Furthermore, chemotherapy may enhance the efficacy of preoperative treatment.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in ypT0N0 Rectal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

In patients who develop a complete pathologic response (ypT0N0) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the benefits of postoperative chemotherapy remain uncertain. This study aims to determine whether treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy in ypT0N0 patients affects short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

From January 2000 to December 2015, 992 patients at our institution underwent surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma following treatment with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. A complete pathologic response was noted in 96 (9.7%) patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 60 (62.5%) patients. We reviewed clinical and pathological records and compared outcomes in ypT0N0 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy to those who did not.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy was 55.6 ± 11.5 years, compared to 62.1 ± 11.7 years for those who did not (p = 0.008). Among the two groups, mean follow-up time after surgery was 5.3 ± 4.1 years for the adjuvant group and 8.3 ± 5.5 years for the non-adjuvant cohort (p = 0.003). The 1, 3, and 5-year survival rates were 100.0%, 97.7%, and 92.1% for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy and 97.2%, 94.1%, and 90.7% for those who did not (p = 0.382). In a subanalysis of patients with available follow-up information, we observed 3/53 (5.7%) disease recurrences in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, compared to 2/18 (11.1%) in those who were not treated postoperatively (p = 0.456).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ypT0N0 rectal adenocarcinoma, we found equivalent survival and recurrence outcomes. Further study will be necessary to determine the importance of adjuvant chemotherapy following ypT0N0 resection.

Improved survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiation regardless of pathologic response

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of postoperative chemotherapy on survival in patients with stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma who undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) and surgical resection.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2006 to 2013 was performed. Cases were analyzed based on pathologic complete response (pCR) status and use of adjuvant therapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival probabilities.

RESULTS

23,045 cases were identified, of which 5832 (25.31%) achieved pCR. In the pCR group, 1513 (25.9%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, and in the non-pCR group, 5966 (34.7%) received adjuvant therapy. In the pCR group, five-year survival probability was 87% (95% CI 84%-89%) with adjuvant therapy and 81% (95% CI 79%-82%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR group, five-year survival probability was 78% (95% CI 76%-79%) with adjuvant therapy and 70% (95% CI 69%-71%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR and node-negative subgroup (ypN-), five-year survival probability was 86% (95% CI 84%-88%) with adjuvant therapy and 76% (95% CI 74%-77%) without adjuvant therapy. In the non-pCR and node-positive subgroup (ypN+), five-year survival probability was 67% (95% CI 65%-70%) with adjuvant therapy and 60% (95% CI 58%-63%) without adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma is associated with increased five-year survival probability regardless of pCR status. We observed similar survival outcomes among non-pCR ypN- treated with adjuvant chemotherapy compared with patients achieving pCR treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study evaluated the prognostic impact of ACT in patients who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR). Articles published from January 1990 to September 2018 were searched in EMBASE, PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) were extracted. Thirteen observational studies were included. There were four National Cancer Database studies with overlapping study periods, thus individual pooled analyses of four different datasets were conducted (n = 3,182, 3,330, 3,575, and 4,739 for pooled analysis sets including Dossa et al., Polanco et al., Xu et al., and Shahab et al., respectively). Although a trend toward improved OS with ACT was observed, statistical significance was not proven (P = 0.09, P = 0.03, P = 0.12, and P = 0.10, respectively). When we performed a stratified analysis comparing the results from single institution and multicenter studies, there was no significant prognostic benefit of ACT. Publication bias was not observed. Routine use of ACT in patients with a pCR could not be warranted from the present meta-analysis. Further study of individual patient data from randomized trials is needed to clarify the role of ACT.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer with complete pathological response (pCR) may not be necessary: a pooled analysis of 5491 patients

Background

It is recommended postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for all rectal cancers undergoing neo-chemoradiotherapy regardless of the final yield pathology. However, the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological complete response (pCR) remains controversial. We aimed to identify the necessarily of adjuvant chemotherapy in pCR.

Methods

Consecutive patients with pCR in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) were enrolled. Meanwhile, a pooled analysis of individual patient with pCR was performed from PubMed and Embase databases for validation.

Results

A total of 171 patients form FUSCC were identified to achieve pCR with up to almost 10 years follow-up. Among them, those receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had no survival benefits compared to those without adjuvant chemotherapy (log-rank test = 0.17, P = 0.676). The 5y-DFS rates for patients in chemo group and no-chemo group was 87.5 and 88.8%, respectively, showing no significant difference (p = 0.854). No matter chemotherapy regimens, T stage, EMVI and CRM status varied, the results remained consistent. Meantime, the COX model did not demonstrate adjuvant chemotherapy as the independent risk factor for OS and DFS. Additionally, among 18 systemic recurrences in all, the rate of relapse surged rapidly on the 12 months and rose up to peak in the 36th months. In order to validate these results, nine controlled trials involving 5491 patients with pCR were included in this pooled-analysis. For both 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival, the pooling data did not produce a statistically significant effect in cases of adjuvant chemotherapy performed (RR = 0.79 and RR = 0.95, respectively, all p > 0.05).

Conclusion

This study suggested that rectal cancer patients with pCR did not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and we recommended that achievement of pCR require more prolonged close follow care in case of distant metastasis.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Current clinical guidelines recommended the routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. However, the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery showed discrepancies in different investigations.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases. All original comparative studies published in English that were related to adjuvant versus non-adjuvant chemotherapy for LARC patients with pCR were included.

RESULTS

A total of 6 studies based on 18 centres or databases involving 2948 rectal cancer patients with pCR (adjuvant group = 1324, non-adjuvant group = 1624) were included in our overall analysis. Based on our meta-analysis, LARC patients with pCR who received adjuvant chemotherapy showed a significantly improved overall survival (OS) when compared to patients with observation (HR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.46-0.90, P = 0.01). In addition, investigations focused on this issue based on the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were systematically reviewed in our current study. Evidence from all three analyses demonstrated that LARC patients with clinical nodal positive disease that achieved pCR might benefit the most from additional adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis indicated that adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved OS in LARC patients with pCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery?

Background and objective

The benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and curative surgery remains controversial, particularly among those responding well to NCRT. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of the oncological outcomes of patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT and curative surgery.

Methods

All patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT and curative resection between 2005 and 2014 were examined. The oncological outcomes between patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and those without any chemotherapy were compared.

Results

The clinicopathological characteristics of 110 patients were reviewed in this study; one patient was excluded due to lack of follow-up. Of the 109 patients included, 58 (53.2%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (chemo group), whereas the remaining 51 (46.8%) did not receive any chemotherapy (non-chemo group). After a median follow-up of 50 months, there were no significant differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates between the groups (OS: 92.1 vs 86.3%, P = 0.375; RFS: 80.9 vs 74.7%, P = 0.534). Subgroup analysis also demonstrated no significant differences in 5-year OS and RFS rates between patients with ypT0N0 rectal cancer (P = 0.712 and P = 0.599, respectively) and those with ypT1–2N0 disease (P = 0.255 and P = 0.278, respectively).

Conclusions

These results indicate that patients with ypT0–2N0 rectal cancer after NCRT followed by curative surgery may not derive significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. However, further prospective randomized trials, with larger sample sizes, are warranted to confirm this conclusion.

Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant chemotherapy improves the survival of locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy

Background

The necessity for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is still not identified. We aimed to investigate the therapeutic value of ACT in these patients.

Methods

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from 105 consecutive LARC patients who achieved pCR after pre-operative CRT and underwent radical tumor resection between December 2008 and April 2014 in a comprehensive cancer center. Perioperative chemotherapy (CT) was administered by combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine (XELOX regimen). Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of patients with or without ACT were compared.

Results

Eighty-three (79.0%) patients received ACT and 22 (21.0%) did not. With a median follow-up of 49 months, the ACT group had a significantly higher 3-year DFS rate (92.8 vs 86.4%, p = 0.029) and 3-year OS rate (95.1 vs 86.1%, p = 0.026) than the non-ACT group. In multivariable analyses, the presence of ACT was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.271; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.080–0.916; p = 0.036) but not for OS. This benefit was more obvious in patients younger than 60 years via subgroup analysis (adjusted HR: 0.106; 95% CI: 0.019–0.606; p = 0.012).

Conclusions

Oxaliplatin-containing ACT may confer survival benefits to patients with pCR, particularly younger patients. However, the routine use of ACT in patients with pCR needs further validation.

Is routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer with complete pathological response justified?

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) can have a complete pathologic response (pCR), and are given postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT).

METHODS

A prospectively maintained outcomes database was queried for patients who had pCR to nCRT for LARC from 2000 to 2012. Local recurrence and survival were analyzed according to whether patients received ACT.

RESULTS

We identified 139 patients and excluded 9 due to lack of follow-up. Mean age was 58.9 ± 11.8 years. 83 patients (63.8%) did not receive ACT (Group A) and 47 (36.2%) did (Group B). Mean follow-up was 5.7 ± 3 and 5.6 ± 3.5 years for Groups A and B respectively (p = 0.51). Groups were comparable in age, gender, tumor differentiation, and clinical staging. There were no differences in oncological outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Avoiding routine use of ACT in patients with a pCR may be considered. Further justification of this approach warrants prospective randomized studies.

An update on the multimodality of localized rectal cancer

New strategies have reduced the local recurrence (LR) rate and extended the duration of overall survival (OS) in patients with localized rectal cancer (RC) in recent decades. The mainstay of curative treatment remains radical surgery; however, downsizing the tumor by neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy and adjuvant cytotoxic therapy for systemic disease has shown significant additional benefit. The standardization of total mesorectal excision (TME), radiation treatment (RT) dose and fractionation, and optimal timing and sequencing of treatment modalities with the use of prolonged administration of fluoropyrimidine concurrent with RT have significantly decreased the rates of LR in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients. This review focuses on the optimization of multi-modality therapies in patients with localized RC.

Advances for achieving a pathological complete response for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

Neoadjuvant therapy has become the standard of care for locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR) can be achieved in 12%–38% of patients. Patients with pCR have the most favorable long-term outcomes. Intensifying neoadjuvant therapy and extending the interval between termination of neoadjuvant treatment and surgery may increase the pCR rate. Growing evidence has raised the issue of whether local excision or observation rather than radical surgery is an alternative for patients who achieve a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. Herein, we highlight many of the advances and resultant controversies that are likely to dominate the research agenda for pCR of rectal cancer in the modern era.

Is It Possible to Shorten the Duration of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?

The long duration of 4 months of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is currently recommended for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation and surgery. Whether a short duration could be applied in these patients is unknown. So, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects on prognosis based on different durations of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer. We performed a retrospective study of 200 rectal cancer patients who were treated with preoperative chemoradiation and were pathologically graded as ypII and ypIII stages between March 2003 and May 2012. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the median duration of adjuvant chemotherapy of 2 months. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients with duration shorter and longer than 2 months in the whole group and subgroups of ypII and ypIII. Recurrence patterns were also analyzed in all subgroups. Multivariate analysis was performed to explore clinical factors that were significantly associated with DFS, local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival. In subgroup of ypII stage, the 5-year OS and DFS were similar between patients in long and short durations of adjuvant chemotherapy. For patients of ypIII stage, although no significant difference was found in OS between patients in short and long durations, DFS was showed to be higher in the group of long duration. Further analysis showed that longer duration of adjuvant chemotherapy could lead to improved control of distant metastasis and no impact on local control. Multivariable analysis indicated that long duration of adjuvant chemotherapy is significantly associated with longer distant metastasis-free survival in patients with ypIII stage, but not in those with ypII stage. A long duration of at least 2 months of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for patients with ypIII stage, whereas it may not be absolutely appropriate for those with ypII stage. Therefore, we suggest a tailored selection of durations of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Risk-Adapted Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Concomitant Fluoropyrimidine-Radiotherapy Neoadjuvant Treatment for Patients With Resectable CT3-4 or N+ Rectal Cancer: Five-Year Disease-Free Survival Results of a Single-Center Series

BACKGROUND

Providing adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is currently a matter of debate. Recommendations from clinical guidelines range from offering no treatment to oxaliplatin-based combinations. We present a risk-adapted approach based on the response to initial chemoradiation as the strongest prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred one patients were treated at a single institution with preoperative long-course radiotherapy plus concurrent fluoropyrimidines. Patients with disease downstaged to pT0-2N0 received adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, while the remaining received an oxaliplatin-based combination. The primary study end point was 5-year DFS.

RESULTS

Overall, the disease of 54 patients was downstaged to pT0-2N0 (53.5%), while that of 47 patients was staged as pT3-4 or N+ (46.5%) after surgery. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 5-year DFS for patients in the good-prognosis group (downstaging to pT0-2 N0) and for those with poor prognosis (pT3-4 or N+) were 79.4% and 66.3%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.489; P = .043). Downstaging and pN+ were independent prognostic factors for DFS.

CONCLUSION

A risk-adapted adjuvant therapy strategy based on pathologic stage after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is feasible and achieves high rates of 5-year DFS. Patients with good prognostic factors can be treated with adjuvant fluoropyrimidines alone, thus permitting the avoidance of oxaliplatin-derived toxicities.

Preoperative Submucosal Injection of Carbon Nanoparticles Improves Lymph Node Staging Accuracy in Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the number of nodes harvested and the rate of node positivity, and to evaluate the effect of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) in improving lymph node detection and staging accuracy in patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) followed by curative resection.

STUDY DESIGN

Between September 2008 and June 2014, 152 consecutive rectal cancer patients treated with NCRT and curative resection were included. Forty-five patients underwent preoperative submucosal injection of CNPs (CNP group); the other patients underwent surgery only (control group). The relationship between the number of lymph nodes harvested and the rate of node positivity was investigated. A comparison of the number of harvested lymph nodes and the node positivity rate between the 2 groups was also performed. The lymph nodes in the CNP group were analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

The rate of node positivity increased gradually from 8.6% in patients with 1 to 5 nodes assessed to 37.8% in patients with 17 to 44 nodes assessed. The number of lymph nodes harvested was an independent risk factor for node positivity (p = 0.036). The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved in the CNP group was more than in the control group (21.1 vs 8.0, p = 0.000). The percentage of patients with positive lymph nodes was lower than in the control group (19.6% vs 35.6%, p = 0.037). In the CNP group, of 58 metastatic lymph nodes, 45 (77.6%) were dyed. Of 37 metastatic lymph nodes smaller than 5 mm, 33 (89.2%) were dyed.

CONCLUSIONS

More precise oncologic prognosis assessment was provided for patients with rectal cancer after NCRT by increasing the number of lymph nodes counted using a dye-tracing method, indicating that the use of CNPs is beneficial.