Final results of a phase II trial for stereotactic body radiation therapy for patients with inoperable liver metastases from colorectal cancer

SBRT-SG-01: final results of a prospective multicenter study on stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver metastases

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of liver metastases.

METHODS

Patients with up to 5 liver metastases were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study and underwent SBRT. Efficacy outcomes included in-field local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Acute and late toxicities were evaluated using CTCAE v.4.0.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients with 105 liver metastases were treated between 2015 and 2018. The most common primary tumor was colorectal cancer (72% of cases). Liver metastases were synchronous with the primary tumor diagnosis in 24 patients (46.2%), and 21 patients (40.4%) presented with other extrahepatic oligometastases. All patients underwent intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and respiratory gating, and a minimum biologically effective dose (BED10Gy) of 100 Gy was delivered to all lesions. With a median follow-up of 23.1 months (range: 13.4-30.9 months) since liver SBRT, the median actuarial local progression-free survival (local-PFS) was not reached. The actuarial in-field LC rates were 84.9% and 78.4% at 24 and 48 months, respectively. The median actuarial liver-PFS and distant-PFS were 11 and 10.8 months, respectively. The actuarial median overall survival (OS) was 27.7 months from SBRT and 52.5 months from metastases diagnosis. Patients with lesion diameter ≤ 5 cm had significantly better median liver-PFS (p = 0.006) and OS (p = 0.018). No acute or late toxicities of grade ≥ 3 were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective multicenter study confirms that liver SBRT is an effective alternative for the treatment of liver metastases, demonstrating high rates of local control and survival while maintaining a low toxicity profile.

Consideration of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expert Survey and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A survey of medical oncologists (MOs), radiation oncologists (ROs), and surgical oncologists (SOs) who are experts in the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) was conducted to identify factors used to consider metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online survey to assess clinical factors when weighing MDT in patients with mCRC was developed based on systematic review of the literature and integrated with clinical vignettes. Supporting evidence from the systematic review was included to aid in answering questions.

RESULTS

Among 75 experts on mCRC invited, 47 (response rate 62.7%) chose to participate including 16 MOs, 16 ROs, and 15 SOs. Most experts would not consider MDT in patients with 3 lesions in both the liver and lung regardless of distribution or timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (6 vs. 36 months after definitive treatment). Similarly, for patients with retroperitoneal lymph node and lung and liver involvement, most experts would not offer MDT regardless of timing of metastatic disease diagnosis. In general, SOs were willing to consider MDT in patients with more advanced disease, ROs were more willing to offer treatment regardless of metastatic site location, and MOs were the least likely to consider MDT.

CONCLUSIONS

Among experts caring for patients with mCRC, significant variation was noted among MOs, ROs, and SOs in the distribution and volume of metastatic disease for which MDT would be considered. This variability highlights differing opinions on management of these patients and underscores the need for well-designed prospective randomized trials to characterize the risks and potential benefits of MDT.

Combined Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Liver Metastases: Safety and Outcomes in a Pooled Analysis of 3 Phase 1 Trials

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) safely and effectively controls liver metastases (LMs), but its safety and efficacy when combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are not well characterized. This analysis of 3 phase 1 trials of combination SBRT and ICI evaluates whether LM-SBRT increases the risk for hepatotoxicity when combined with ICI and explores efficacy endpoints.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data were analyzed from 3 phase 1 trials of combination SBRT and ICI for patients with metastatic solid tumors conducted between 2016 and 2020. ICI was administered per trial protocol with LM-SBRT delivered to 45 Gy in 3 fractions with mean liver dose <16 Gy and ≥700 cc of normal liver spared 17.1 Gy. Hepatic adverse events (HAEs) were defined as hepatic failure, autoimmune hepatitis, or elevation of aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin, or alkaline phosphatase using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Cumulative incidence of HAEs and local failure were modeled with death as a competing risk. Competing risk regression was performed using Fine-Gray modeling. Survival was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients were analyzed, including 81 patients with LM, 57 of whom received LM-SBRT. The 12-month rate of any grade ≥2 HAE was 11% and 10% in LM-SBRT and non-LM-SBRT patients, respectively non-significant (NS). Radiographic evidence for liver disease and dual-agent ICI was significantly associated with HAEs on univariable and multivariable analysis, but liver dose metrics were not. Patients with LM had significantly worse progression-free and overall survival compared with those without, and local failure of treated LM was significantly higher than for treated extrahepatic metastases (28% vs 4% at 12 months, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination LM-SBRT and ICI did not significantly increase the risk for HAEs compared with ICI without LM-SBRT, suggesting hepatotoxicity is largely driven by factors other than liver radiation therapy, such as choice of ICI. LM is associated with worse overall survival and local control outcomes.

MR-guided stereotactic radiotherapy of infra-diaphragmatic oligometastases: Evaluation of toxicity and dosimetric parameters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The SOFT trial is a prospective, multicenter, phase 2 trial investigating magnetic resonance (MR)-guided stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for abdominal, soft tissue metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease (OMD) (clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04407897). We present the primary endpoint analysis of 1-year treatment-related toxicity (TRAE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with up to five oligometastases from non-hematological cancers were eligible for inclusion. A risk-adapted strategy prioritized fixed organs at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. Fractionation schemes were 45-67.5 Gy in 3-8 fractions. The primary endpoint was grade ≥ 4 TRAE within 12 months post-SABR. The association between the risk of gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity and clinical and dosimetric parameters was tested using a normal tissue complication probability model.

RESULTS

We included 121 patients with 147 oligometastatic targets, mainly located in the liver (41 %), lymph nodes (35 %), or adrenal glands (14 %). Nearly half of all targets (48 %, n = 71) were within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs, 3.5 % grade 3 TRAEs, and 43.7 % grade 2 TRAEs were reported within the first year of follow-up. We found a significant association between grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity and the parameters GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc.

CONCLUSION

In this phase II study of MR-guided SABR of oligometastases in the infra-diaphragmatic region, we found a low incidence of toxicity despite half of the lesions being within 10 mm of a radiosensitive OAR. GI OAR D0.1cc, D1cc, and D20cc were associated with grade ≥ 2 GI toxicity.

Radiation Therapy for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: The Effect of Radiation Therapy Dose and Chemotherapy on Local Control and Survival

Purpose

Colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) represent a radioresistant histology. We aimed to investigate CLM radiation therapy (RT) outcomes and explore the association with treatment parameters.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective analysis of CLM treated with RT at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center used Kaplan-Meier analysis to estimate freedom from local progression (FFLP), hepatic progression-free, progression-free, and overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate association with clinical factors. Dose-response relationship was further evaluated using a mechanistic tumor control probability (TCP) model.

Results

Ninety patients with 122 evaluable CLMs treated 2006 to 2019 with a variety of RT fractionation schemes with a median biologically effective dose (α/β = 10; BED10) of 97.9 Gy (range, 43.2-187.5 Gy) were included. Median lesion size was 3.5 cm (0.7-11.8 cm). Eighty-seven patients (97%) received prior systemic therapy, and 73 patients (81%) received prior liver-directed therapy. At a median follow-up of 26.4 months, rates of FFLP and OS were 62% (95% CI, 53%-72%) and 75% (66%-84%) at 1 year and 42% (95% CI, 32%-55%) and 44% (95% CI, 34%-57%) at 2 years, respectively. BED10 below 96 Gy and receipt of ≥3 lines of chemotherapy were associated with worse FFLP (hazard ratio [HR], 2.69; 95% CI, 1.54-4.68; P < .001 and HR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.50-4.74; P < .001, respectively) and OS (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.35-4.09; P = .002 and HR, 4.70; 95% CI, 2.37-9.31; P < .001) on univariate analyses, which remained significant or marginally significant on multivariate analyses. A mechanistic Tumor Control Probability (TCP) model showed a higher 2-Gy equivalent dose needed for local control in patients who had been exposed to ≥ 3 lines of chemotherapy versus 0 to 2 (250 ± 29 vs 185 ± 77 Gy for 70% TCP).

Conclusions

In a large single-institution series of heavily pretreated patients with CLM undergoing liver RT, low BED10 and multiple prior lines of systemic therapy were associated with lower local control and OS. These results support continued dose escalation efforts for patients with CLM.

SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know

This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.

Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases: State of the Art

Liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Treatment of CRC liver metastases (CRLM) includes different strategies, prevalently based on the clinical and oncological intent. Valid approaches in liver-limited or liver-prevalent disease include surgery, percutaneous ablative procedures (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation), intra-arterial perfusional techniques (chemo-embolization, radio-embolization) as well as stereotactic radiotherapy. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other biological agents, are the only options for patients with no chance of locoregional approaches. The use of chemotherapy in other settings, such as neoadjuvant, adjuvant or conversion therapy of CRLM, is commonly accepted in the clinical practice, although data from several clinical trials have been mostly inconclusive. The optimal integration of all these strategies, when applicable and clinically indicated, should be ever considered in patients affected by CRLM based on clinical evidence and multidisciplinary experience. Here we revised in detail all the possible therapeutic approaches of CRLM focusing on the current evidences, the studies still in progress and the often contradictory data.

Optimizing Treatment Strategy for Oligometastases/Oligo-Recurrence of Colorectal Cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer, and nearly half of CRC patients experience metastases. Oligometastatic CRC represents a distinct clinical state characterized by limited metastatic involvement, demonstrating a less aggressive nature and potentially improved survival with multidisciplinary treatment. However, the varied clinical scenarios giving rise to oligometastases necessitate a precise definition, considering primary tumor status and oncological factors, to optimize treatment strategies. This review delineates the concepts of oligometastatic CRC, encompassing oligo-recurrence, where the primary tumor is under control, resulting in a more favorable prognosis. A comprehensive examination of multidisciplinary treatment with local treatments and systemic therapy is provided. The overarching objective in managing oligometastatic CRC is the complete eradication of metastases, offering prospects of a cure. Essential to this management approach are local treatments, with surgical resection serving as the standard of care. Percutaneous ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy present less invasive alternatives for lesions unsuitable for surgery, demonstrating efficacy in select cases. Perioperative systemic therapy, aiming to control micrometastatic disease and enhance local treatment effectiveness, has shown improvements in progression-free survival through clinical trials. However, the extension of overall survival remains variable. The review emphasizes the need for further prospective trials to establish a cohesive definition and an optimized treatment strategy for oligometastatic CRC.

Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Definitions and Patient Selection for Local Therapies

PURPOSE

Nearly one-third of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will ultimately develop metastatic disease. While a small percentage of patients can be considered for curative resection, more patients have limited disease that can be considered for local therapy. Challenges remain in defining oligometastatic CRC as well as developing treatment strategies guided by high level evidence.

METHODS

In this review, we present the challenges in defining oligometastatic CRC and summarize the current literature on treatment and outcomes of local therapy in patients with metastatic CRC.

RESULTS

For patients with liver- and/or lung-confined CRC metastases, surgical resection is the standard of care given the potential for long-term progression-free and overall survival. For patients with liver- or lung-confined disease not amenable to surgical resection, non-surgical local therapies, such as thermal ablation, hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP), or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), should be considered. For patients with more advanced disease, such as lymph node or bony metastases, the role of metastasis-directed therapy is controversial. Emerging data suggests that SBRT to ablate all metastases can improve progression-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Multidisciplinary management is critical for patients with metastatic CRC due to the complexity of their cases and the nuanced patient, tumor, biological, and anatomical factors that must be weighed when considering local therapy. High-quality prospective randomized data in CRC are needed to further clarify the role of local ablative therapy in patients with unresectable oligometastatic CRC with ongoing studies including the RESOLUTE trial (ACTRN12621001198819) and the upcoming NCTN ERASur trial (NCT05673148).

Patient specific quality assurance in SBRT: a systematic review of measurement-based methods

This topical review focuses on Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) approaches to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). SBRT requires stricter accuracy than standard radiation therapy due to the high dose per fraction and the limited number of fractions. The review considered various PSQA methods reported in 36 articles between 01/2010 and 07/2022 for SBRT treatment. In particular comparison among devices and devices designed for SBRT, sensitivity and resolution, verification methodology, gamma analysis were specifically considered. The review identified a list of essential data needed to reproduce the results in other clinics, highlighted the partial miss of data reported in scientific papers, and formulated recommendations for successful implementation of a PSQA protocol.

RIFLE: a Phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Currently, the prognosis for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) still remains poor. The management of mCRC has become manifold because of the varied advances in the systemic and topical treatment approaches. For patients with limited number of metastases, radical local therapy plus systemic therapy can be a good choice to achieve long-term tumor control. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of fruquintinib, tislelizumab, and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in mCRC (RIFLE study).

Methods

RIFLE was designed as a single-center, single-arm, prospective Phase II clinical trial. A total of 68 mCRC patients who have failed the first-line standard treatment will be recruited in the safety run-in phase (n = 6) and the expansion phase (n = 62), respectively. Eligible patients will receive SABR followed by fruquintinib (5 mg, d1-14, once every day) and tislelizumab (200 mg, d1, once every 3 weeks) within 2 weeks from completion of radiation. The expansion phase starts when the safety of the treatment is determined (dose limiting toxicity occur in no more than one-sixth of patients in the run-in phase). The primary end point is the objective response rate. The secondary end points include the disease control rate, duration of response, 3-year progression-free survival rate, 3-year overall survival rate, and toxicity.

Conclusions

The results of this trial will provide a novel insight into SABR in combination with PD-1 antibody and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor in the systematic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, which is expected to provide new therapeutic strategies and improve the prognosis for mCRC patients.

Trial registration

NCT04948034 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Integrated Clinical-Molecular Classification of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Biomarker Analysis of the Phase 3 New EPOC Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Personalized treatment approaches for patients with oligometastatic colorectal liver metastases are critically needed. We previously defined 3 biologically distinct molecular subtypes of colorectal liver metastases: (1) canonical, (2) immune, and (3) stromal.

Objective

To independently validate these molecular subtypes in the phase 3 New EPOC randomized clinical trial.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective secondary analysis of the phase 3 New EPOC randomized clinical trial included a bi-institutional discovery cohort and multi-institutional validation cohort. The discovery cohort comprised patients who underwent hepatic resection for limited colorectal liver metastases (98% received perioperative chemotherapy) from May 31, 1994, to August 14, 2012. The validation cohort comprised patients who underwent hepatic resection for liver metastases with perioperative chemotherapy (fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan based) with or without cetuximab from February 26, 2007, to November 1, 2012. Data were analyzed from January 18 to December 10, 2021.

Interventions

Resected metastases underwent RNA sequencing and microRNA (miRNA) profiling in the discovery cohort and messenger RNA and miRNA profiling with microarray in the validation cohort.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A 31-feature (24 messenger RNAs and 7 miRNAs) neural network classifier was trained to predict molecular subtypes in the discovery cohort and applied to the validation cohort. Integrated clinical-molecular risk groups were designated based on molecular subtypes and the clinical risk score. The unique biological phenotype of each molecular subtype was validated using gene set enrichment analyses and immune deconvolution. The primary clinical end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 240 patients were included (mean [range] age, 63.0 [56.3-68.0] years; 151 [63%] male), with 93 in the discovery cohort and 147 in the validation cohort. In the validation cohort, 73 (50%), 28 (19%), and 46 (31%) patients were classified as having canonical, immune, and stromal metastases, respectively. The biological phenotype of each subtype was concordant with the discovery cohort. The immune subtype (best prognosis) demonstrated 5-year PFS of 43% (95% CI, 25%-60%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20-0.68) and OS of 63% (95% CI, 40%-79%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86), which was statistically significantly higher than the canonical subtype (worst prognosis) at 14% (95% CI, 7%-23%) and 43% (95% CI, 32%-55%), respectively. Adding molecular subtypes to the clinical risk score improved prediction (the Gönen and Heller K for discrimination) from 0.55 (95% CI, 0.49-0.61) to 0.62 (95% CI, 0.57-0.67) for PFS and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.52-0.66) to 0.63 (95% CI, 0.56-0.70) for OS. The low-risk integrated group demonstrated 5-year PFS of 44% (95% CI, 20%-66%; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.19-0.76) and OS of 78% (95% CI, 44%-93%; HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.08-0.84), superior to the high-risk group at 16% (95% CI, 10%-24%) and 43% (95% CI, 32%-52%), respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this prognostic study, biologically derived colorectal liver metastasis molecular subtypes and integrated clinical-molecular risk groups were highly prognostic. This novel molecular classification warrants further study as a possible predictive biomarker for personalized systemic treatment for colorectal liver metastases.

Trial Registration

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN22944367.

Carbon-ion radiotherapy for oligometastatic liver disease: A national multicentric study by the Japan Carbon-Ion Radiation Oncology Study Group (J-CROS)

Reports on the therapeutic efficacy and safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT) for oligometastatic liver disease are limited, with insufficient evidence. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of C-ion RT for oligometastatic liver disease at all Japanese facilities using the nationwide cohort data. We reviewed the medical records to obtain the nationwide cohort registry data on C-ion RT between May 2016 and June 2020. Patients (1) with oligometastatic liver disease as confirmed by histological or diagnostic imaging, (2) with ≤3 synchronous liver metastases at the time of treatment, (3) without active extrahepatic disease, and (4) who received C-ion RT for all metastatic regions with curative intent were included in this study. C-ion RT was performed with 58.0-76.0 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 1-20 fractions. In total, 102 patients (121 tumors) were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up duration for all patients was 19.0 months. The median tumor size was 27 mm. The 1-year/2-year overall survival, local control, and progression-free survival rates were 85.1%/72.8%, 90.5%/78.0%, and 48.3%/27.1%, respectively. No patient developed grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicity. C-ion RT is a safe and effective treatment for oligometastatic liver disease and may be beneficial as a local treatment option in multidisciplinary treatment.

Efficacy of Thermal Ablation for Small-Size (0-3 cm) versus Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results from the Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE)

PURPOSE

Thermal ablation is widely recognized as the standard of care for small-size unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). For larger CRLM safety, local control and overall efficacy are not well established and insufficiently validated. The purpose of this comparative series was to analyze outcomes for intermediate-size versus small-size CRLM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients treated with thermal ablation between December 2000 and November 2021 for small-size and intermediate-size CRLM were included. The primary endpoints were complication rate and local control (LC). Secondary endpoints included local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

In total, 59 patients were included in the intermediate-size (3-5 cm) group and 221 in the small-size (0-3 cm) group. Complications were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.546). No significant difference between the groups was found in an overall comparison of OS (HR 1.339; 95% CI 0.824-2.176; p = 0.239). LTPFS (HR 3.388; p < 0.001) and LC (HR 3.744; p = 0.004) were superior in the small-size group. Nevertheless, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year LC for intermediate-size CRLM was still 93.9%, 85.4%, and 81.5%, and technical efficacy improved over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Thermal ablation for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM is safe and induces long-term LC in the vast majority. The results of the COLLISION-XL trial (unresectable colorectal liver metastases: stereotactic body radiotherapy versus microwave ablation-a phase II randomized controlled trial for CRLM 3-5 cm) are required to provide further clarification of the role of local ablative methods for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM.

Twenty Years of Advancements in a Radiotherapy Facility: Clinical Protocols, Technology, and Management

BACKGROUND

Hypo-fractionation can be an effective strategy to lower costs and save time, increasing patient access to advanced radiation therapy. To demonstrate this potential in practice within the context of temporal evolution, a twenty-year analysis of a representative radiation therapy facility from 2003 to 2022 was conducted. This analysis utilized comprehensive data to quantitatively evaluate the connections between advanced clinical protocols and technological improvements. The findings provide valuable insights to the management team, helping them ensure the delivery of high-quality treatments in a sustainable manner.

METHODS

Several parameters related to treatment technique, patient positioning, dose prescription, fractionation, equipment technology content, machine workload and throughput, therapy times and patients access counts were extracted from departmental database and analyzed on a yearly basis by means of linear regression.

RESULTS

Patients increased by 121 ± 6 new per year (NPY). Since 2010, the incidence of hypo-fractionation protocols grew thanks to increasing Linac technology. In seven years, both the average number of fractions and daily machine workload decreased by -0.84 ± 0.12 fractions/year and -1.61 ± 0.35 patients/year, respectively. The implementation of advanced dose delivery techniques, image guidance and high dose rate beams for high fraction doses, currently systematically used, has increased the complexity and reduced daily treatment throughput since 2010 from 40 to 32 patients per 8 h work shift (WS8). Thanks to hypo-fractionation, such an efficiency drop did not affect NPY, estimating 693 ± 28 NPY/WS8, regardless of the evaluation time. Each newly installed machine was shown to add 540 NPY, while absorbing 0.78 ± 0.04 WS8. The COVID-19 pandemic brought an overall reduction of 3.7% of patients and a reduction of 0.8 fractions/patient, to mitigate patient crowding in the department.

CONCLUSIONS

The evolution of therapy protocols towards hypo-fractionation was supported by the use of proper technology. The characteristics of this process were quantified considering time progression and organizational aspects. This strategy optimized resources while enabling broader access to advanced radiation therapy. To truly value the benefit of hypo-fractionation, a reimbursement policy should focus on the patient rather than individual treatment fractionation.

Unresectable Intermediate-Size (3-5 cm) Colorectal Liver Metastases: Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy Versus Microwave Ablation (COLLISION-XL): Protocol of a Phase II/III Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Although microwave ablation (MWA) has a low complication rate and good efficacy for small-size (≤ 3 cm) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), local control decreases with increasing size. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining interest as a potential means to treat intermediate-size CRLM and might be less susceptible to increasing volume. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of MWA to SBRT in patients with unresectable, intermediate-size (3-5 cm) CRLM.

METHODS

In this two-arm, multicentre phase II/ III randomized controlled trial, 68 patients with 1-3 unresectable, intermediate-size CRLM suitable for both MWA and SBRT, will be included. Patients will be treated with MWA or SBRT as randomised. The Primary endpoint is local tumour progression-free survival (LTPFS) at 1 year (intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall survival, overall and distant progression-free survival (DPFS), local control (LC) and procedural morbidity and mortality and assessment of pain and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

Current guidelines lack clear recommendations for the local treatment of liver only intermediate-size, unresectable CRLM and studies comparing curative intent SBRT and thermal ablation are scarce. Although safety and feasibility to eradicate tumours ≤ 5 cm have been established, both techniques suffer from lower LTPFS and LC rates for larger-size tumours. For the treatment of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM clinical equipoise has been reached. We have designed a two-armed phase II/ III randomized controlled trial directly comparing SBRT to MWA for unresectable CRLM 3-5 cm.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, phase II/ III Randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04081168, September 9th 2019.

The Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Colorectal Cancer: Present Strategies and Future Perspectives

Oligometastatic disease has been described as an intermediate clinical state between localized cancer and systemically metastasized disease. Recent clinical studies have shown prolonged survival when aggressive locoregional approaches are added to systemic therapies in patients with oligometastases. The aim of this review is to outline the newest options to treat oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), also considering its molecular patterns. We present an overview of the available local treatment strategies, including surgical procedures, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), thermal ablation, as well as trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT). Moreover, since imaging methods provide crucial information for the early diagnosis and management of oligometastatic CRC, we discuss the role of modern radiologic techniques in selecting patients that are amenable to potentially curative locoregional treatments.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Liver Metastases

The liver is a common site for metastatic spread for various primary tumor histologies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment technique with broad patient candidacy for the ablation of tumors in the liver and other organs. SBRT involves focused, high-dose radiation therapy delivered in one to several treatments, resulting in high rates of local control. Use of SBRT for ablation of oligometastatic disease has increased in recent years and emerging prospective data have demonstrated improvements in progression free and overall survival in some settings. When delivering SBRT to liver metastases, clinicians must balance the priorities of delivering ablative tumor dosing while respecting dose constraints to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Motion management techniques are crucial for meeting dose constraints, ensuring low rates of toxicity, maintaining quality of life, and can allow for dose escalation. Advanced radiotherapy delivery approaches including proton therapy, robotic radiotherapy, and real-time MR-guided radiotherapy may further improve the accuracy of liver SBRT. In this article, we review the rationale for oligometastases ablation, the clinical outcomes with liver SBRT, tumor dose and OAR considerations, and evolving strategies to improve liver SBRT delivery.

Clinical outcomes and factors involved in the local control of proton beam therapy for oligometastatic liver tumors in patients with colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are no existing reports on proton beam therapy (PBT) for local control (LC) of liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (LMCRC). We calculated the LC rate of PBT for LMCRC and explored the influence of each factor on the LC rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cases in which PBT was performed at our center between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively selected from the database. Patients with LMCRC without extrahepatic lesions and no more than three liver metastases were included. Effectiveness was assessed based on LC, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Adverse events (AEs) are described. Factors that may be related to LC were also investigated.

RESULTS

This study included 23 men and 18 women, with a median age of 66 (range 24-87) years. A total of 63 lesions were included in the study. The most frequent dose was 72.6 Gy (relative biological effectiveness)/22 fractions. The median follow-up period was 27.6 months. The 3‑year LC, OS, and PFS rates were 54.9%, 61.6%, and 16.7%, respectively. Our multivariate analysis identified the distance between the tumor and the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as a factor associated with LC (P = 0.02). No grade ≥ 3 AEs were observed. None of the patients experienced liver failure during the acute or late phase.

CONCLUSION

Care must be taken with tumors that have reduced planning target volume coverage owing to organs at risk restrictions, especially in tumors near the GI tract.

Ablative Therapy in Non-HCC Liver Malignancy

Surgical extirpation of liver tumors remains a proven approach in the management of metastatic tumors to the liver, particularly those of colorectal origin. Ablative, non-resective therapies are an increasingly attractive primary therapy for liver tumors as they are generally better tolerated and result in far less morbidity and mortality. Ablative therapies preserve greater normal liver parenchyma allowing better post-treatment liver function and are particularly appropriate for treating subsequent liver-specific tumor recurrence. This article reviews the current status of ablative therapies for non-hepatocellular liver tumors with a discussion of many of the clinically available approaches.

Feasibility and dosimetric evaluation of single- and multi-isocentre stereotactic body radiation therapy for multiple liver metastases

Objectives

Single-isocentre volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves treatment efficiency and patient compliance for patients with multiple liver metastases (MLM). However, the potential increase in dose spillage to normal liver tissue using a single-isocentre technique has not yet been studied. We comprehensively evaluated the quality of single- and multi-isocentre VMAT-SBRT for MLM and propose a RapidPlan-based automatic planning (AP) approach for MLM SBRT.

Methods

A total of 30 patients with MLM (two or three lesions) were selected for this retrospective study. We manually replanned all patients treated with MLM SBRT by using the single-isocentre (MUS) and multi-isocentre (MUM) techniques. Then, we randomly selected 20 MUS and MUM plans for training to generate the single-isocentre RapidPlan model (RPS) and the multi-isocentre RapidPlan model (RPM). Finally, we used data from the remaining 10 patients to validate RPS and RPM.

Results

Compared with MUS, MUM reduced the mean dose delivered to the right kidney by 0.3 Gy. The mean liver dose (MLD) was 2.3 Gy higher for MUS compared with MUM. However, the monitor units, delivery time, and V20Gy of normal liver (liver-gross tumour volume) for MUM were significantly higher than for MUS. Based on validation, RPS and RPM slightly improved the MLD, V20Gy, normal tissue complications, and dose sparing to the right and left kidneys and spinal cord compared with manual plans (MUS vs RPS and MUM vs RPM), but RPS and RPM significantly increased monitor units and delivery time.

Conclusions

The single-isocentre VMAT-SBRT approach could be used for MLM to reduce treatment time and patient comfort at the cost of a small increase in the MLD. Compared with the manual plans, RapidPlan-based plans, especially RPS, have slightly improved quality.

Predicting the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases

•

Predicting the benefit from Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of colorectal cancer metastases.

•

CLInical Categorical Algorithm (CLICAL©) – a predictive algorithm applied to SBRT.

•

The benefit from SBRT varies among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

•

CLICAL© may be used as a screening tool for SBRT referrals.

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Active breathing control guided stereotactic body ablative radiotherapy for management of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Background: Liver metastases may occur during the course of several cancer types and may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is paucity of data regarding the utility of Active Breathing Control (ABC) guided Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) for management of Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer (LMCC). Our aim is to investigate the role of ABC guided SABR for management of liver metastases Patients and methods: 42 liver metastases of 29 patients treated with ABC guided SABR between February 2015 and October 2018 were retrospectively assessed for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and toxicity outcomes. Primary endpoint was LC. Secondary endpoints were OS and treatment toxicity. Results: At a median follow up duration of 16 months (range: 9-74 months), median OS was 20 months and 3 patients were still alive at last follow up. 1-year OS was 83% and 2-year OS was 28%. LC rates were 92% and 61% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Comparative analysis of Biological Effective Dose (BED) values revealed that higher BED10 values were associated with higher LC rates (p=0.007). While LC rates for BED10 ≥ 100 Gray (Gy) were 94% and 86% at 1 and 2 years, corresponding LC rates for BED10 < 100 Gy were 89% and 36%, respectively with statistical significance (p=0.007). Assessment of acute and late toxicity outcomes revealed that most common toxicity was fatigue, however, no patients had ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Conclusion: ABC guided SABR is an effective and safe treatment modality for LMCC management.

Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in multidisciplinary management of liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer

In the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with distant metastases, the development of new anticancer agents has considerably prolonged progression-free survival. Such survival benefits attributed to chemotherapy have increased the relative significance of local therapy in patients with limited metastases. The liver is recognized as the most common site of metastasis of colorectal cancer because of the intestinal mesenteric drainage to the portal veins. Hepatic resection of isolated liver metastases of colorectal cancer is the only option for a potential cure. However, hepatic metastases are resectable in only approximately 20% of the patients. For remaining patients with high-risk resectable liver metastases or those who are unfit for surgery, less invasive, local therapies including radiation therapy (stereotactic body radiation therapy, SBRT) may have a potential role in treatment. Although the local control rate of SBRT for colorectal liver metastases has room for improvement, its less-invasive nature and broad indications deserve consideration. Future research should include SBRT dose escalation or the selection of patients who benefit from local ablative therapies. SBRT may offer an alternative, non-invasive approach for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases in a multidisciplinary treatment strategy.

The oligometastatic spectrum in the era of improved detection and modern systemic therapy

Metastases remain the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. The oligometastasis hypothesis postulates that a spectrum of metastatic spread exists and that some patients with a limited burden of metastases can be cured with ablative therapy. Over the past decade, substantial advances in systemic therapies have resulted in considerable improvements in the outcomes of patients with metastatic cancers, warranting re-examination of the oligometastatic paradigm and the role of local ablative therapies within the context of the improved therapeutic responses, shifting patterns of disease recurrence and possible synergy with systemic treatments. Herein, we reframe the oligometastatic phenotype as a dynamic state for which locally ablative, metastasis-directed therapy improves clinical outcomes, including by prolonging survival and increasing cure rates. Important risk factors defining the metastatic spectrum are highlighted that inform both staging and therapy. Finally, we synthesize the literature on combining local therapies with modern systemic treatments, identifying general themes to optimally integrate ablative therapies in this context.

Salvage 125I brachytherapy for liver metastases of colorectal cancer in anatomically challenging locations after failure of systemic chemotherapy-A retrospective study

PURPSOE

Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CCLM) in anatomically challenging locations is difficult to treat. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of permanent ¹²⁵I seeds implantation (ISI) for treatment of CCLM in anatomically challenging locations after failure of systemic chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 31 liver metastases (in 25 patients) were treated by ISI under computerized tomography guidance from January 2011 to December 2017. Post-treatment follow-up was for 40 months. Adverse events were classified using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Tumor response was evaluated by the mRECIST criteria. Objective response rate, overall survival rate, and complications were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All ISI procedures were performed successfully. Most patients only complained of fatigue and mild pain after ISI. Only one patient had liver rupture during the procedure. Serum alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels at 1 month after ISI were not significantly different from pre-procedure levels (p > 0.05). Computed tomography at 6 months after ISI treatment showed completed response in 11 (11/31, 35.5%) lesions, partial response in 14 (14/31, 45.2%) lesions, stable disease in 4 (4/31, 12.9%) lesions, and disease progression in 2 (2/31, 6.5%) lesions; thus, the objective response rate was 80.6%. Median survival was for 12 months. The 1 and 2 year overall survival rates were 52.0% and 20.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

¹²⁵I seeds implantation for CCLM in anatomically challenging locations is safe and effective. Survival benefit is limited in the salvage setting where patients have high intrahepatic tumor load after failed systemic chemotherapy.

Microwave Ablation, Radiofrequency Ablation, Irreversible Electroporation, and Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Intermediate Size (3-5 cm) Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose of Review

Based on good local control rates and an excellent safety profile, guidelines consider thermal ablation the gold standard to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). However, efficacy decreases exponentially with increasing tumour size. The preferred treatment for intermediate-size unresectable CRLM remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare safety and efficacy of local ablative treatments for unresectable intermediate-size CRLM (3–5 cm).

Recent Findings

We systematically searched for publications reporting treatment outcomes of unresectable intermediate-size CRLM treated with thermal ablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE) or stereotactic ablative body-radiotherapy (SABR). No comparative studies or randomized trials were found. Literature to assess effectiveness was limited and there was substantial heterogeneity in outcomes and study populations. Per-patient local control ranged 22–90% for all techniques; 22–89% (8 series) for thermal ablation, 44% (1 series) for IRE, and 67–90% (1 series) for SABR depending on radiation dose.

Summary

Focal ablative therapy is safe and can induce long-term disease control, even for intermediate-size CRLM. Although SABR and tumuor-bracketing techniques such as IRE are suggested to be less susceptible to size, evidence to support any claims of superiority of one technique over the other is unsubstantiated by the available evidence. Future prospective comparative studies should address local-tumour-progression-free-survival, local control rate, overall survival, adverse events, and quality-of-life.

The Role of Ablative Radiotherapy to Liver Oligometastases from Colorectal Cancer

Purpose of Review

This review describes recent data supporting locoregional ablative radiation in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Recent Findings

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) demonstrates high rates of local control in colorectal cancer liver metastases when a biologically equivalent dose of > 100 Gy is delivered. Future innovations to improve the efficacy of SBRT include MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) to enhance target accuracy, systemic immune activation to treat extrahepatic disease, and genomic customization. Selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) with y-90 is an intra-arterial therapy that delivers high doses to liver metastases internally which has shown to increase liver disease control in phase 3 trials. Advancements in transarterial radioembolization (TARE) dosimetry could improve local control and decrease toxicity.

Summary

SBRT and SIRT are both promising options in treating unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer liver metastases. Identification of oligometastatic patients who receive long-term disease control from either therapy is essential. Future advancements focusing on improving radiation design and customization could further improve efficacy and toxicity.

Local Treatments in the Unresectable Patient with Colorectal Cancer Metastasis: A Review from the Point of View of the Medical Oncologist

For patients with isolated liver metastases from colorectal cancer who are not candidates for potentially curative resections, non-surgical local treatments may be useful. Non-surgical local treatments are classified according to how the treatment is administered. Local treatments are applied directly on hepatic parenchyma, such as radiofrequency, microwave hyperthermia and cryotherapy. Locoregional therapies are delivered through the hepatic artery, such as chemoinfusion, chemoembolization or selective internal radiation with Yttrium 90 radioembolization. The purpose of this review is to describe the different interventional therapies that are available for these patients in routine clinical practice, the most important clinical trials that have tried to demonstrate the effectiveness of each therapy and recommendations from principal medical oncologic societies.

Radiofrequency Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) and to determine the favorable treatment modality according to tumor characteristics.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 222 colorectal cancer patients with 330 CRLM who underwent RFA (268 tumors in 178 patients) or SBRT (62 tumors in 44 patients) between 2007 and 2014. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models were used by adjusting with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

Results

The median follow-up duration was 30.5 months. The median tumor size was significantly smaller in the RFA group than in the SBRT group (1.5 cm vs 2.3 cm, p < 0.001). In IPTW-adjusted analysis, difference in treatment modality was not associated with significant differences in 1-year and 3-year recurrence-free survival (35% vs. 43%, 22% vs. 23%; p=0.198), overall survival (96% vs. 91%, 58% vs. 56%; p=0.508), and freedom from local progression (FFLP; 90% vs. 72%, 78% vs. 60%; p=0.106). Significant interaction effect between the treatment modality and tumor size was observed for FFLP (p=0.001). In IPTW-adjusted subgroup analysis of patients with tumor size > 2 cm, the SBRT group had a higher FFLP compared with the RFA group (hazard ratio, 0.153; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

SBRT and RFA showed similar local control in the treatment of patients with CRLM. Tumor size was an independent prognostic factor for local control and SBRT may be preferred for larger tumors.

Significance of liver metastasis volume in breast cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the impact of liver metastasis (LM) volume on treatment outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

This single-institution retrospective analysis included 40 oligometastatic (≤ 5 metastases) BC patients with 58 liver metastases treated with SBRT between April 2013 and March 2021. The prognostic factors for local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were assessed.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time was 28.1 months. Isolated and solitary LM were seen in 26 (65%) and 24 (60%) patients, respectively. Median time to disease recurrence was 10.7 months post liver SBRT. The 2‑year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 71.4%, 27.5%, and 86.8%, respectively. In univariate analysis, patients with a gross tumor volume (GTV) of ≤ 6 cc and a planning target volume (PTV) of ≤ 38 cc demonstrated a significantly better median OS than those with GTV > 6 cc and PTV > 38 cc. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors for worse OS were GTV > 6 cc (HR = 3.07 [95% CI, 1.14-8.22; p = 0.03]) and PTV > 38 cc (HR = 5.91 [95% CI, 1.92-18.21; p = 0.002]). No significant factor for PFS was found. Only 2 patients experienced rib fracture at 4 and 6 months post treatment, and 1 patient had a grade II duodenal ulcer.

CONCLUSION

Liver SBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for oligometastatic BC patients with excellent LC, promising survival, and limited toxicity. Patients with smaller tumors displayed better OS than their counterparts, validating the effectiveness of a local treatment for this group.

Thermal Ablation versus Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy to Treat Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Comparative Analysis from the Prospective Amsterdam CORE Registry

Thermal ablation and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are techniques to eradicate colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This study compares the safety, efficacy and long-term oncological outcomes of these treatment methods. All prospectively registered patients (AmCORE registry) treated with thermal ablation or SABR alone for unresectable CRLM between 2007 and 2020 were analyzed using multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression. In total 199 patients were included for analysis: 144 (400 CRLM) thermal ablation; 55 (69 CRLM) SABR. SABR patients were characterized by older age (p = 0.006), extrahepatic disease at diagnosis (p = 0.004) and larger tumors (p < 0.001). Thermal ablation patients were more likely to have synchronous disease, higher clinical risk scores (p = 0.030) and higher numbers of CRLMs treated (p < 0.001). Mortality was zero and morbidity low in both groups: no serious adverse events were recorded following SABR (n = 0/55) and nine (n = 9/144 [6.3%]; all CTCAE grade 3) after thermal ablation. SABR was associated with an inferior overall survival (OS) (median OS 53.0 months vs. 27.4 months; HR = 1.29, 95% CI 1.12-1.49; p = 0.003), local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS) per-tumor (HR = 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.52; p = 0.044) and local control per-patient (HR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.20-2.04; p = 0.001) and per-tumor (HR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.44-2.49; p < 0.001). In this study thermal ablation was superior to SABR with regard to OS, LTPFS and local control, albeit at the cost of a limited risk of serious adverse events. Further studies are required to assess whether the worse outcomes following SABR were the effect of true differences in ablative treatment or a result of residual confounding.

Treatment Strategies for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Oligometastatic breast cancer, typically defined as the presence of 1-5 metastases, represents an intermediate state between locally advanced and widely metastatic disease. Emerging research suggests that oligometastatic cancer has a unique molecular signature distinct from widely metastatic disease, and that it carries a superior prognosis. Owing to its more limited capacity for widespread progression, oligometastatic disease may benefit from aggressive ablative therapy to known metastases. Options for ablation include surgical excision, radiofrequency ablation, and hypofractionated image-guided radiotherapy (HIGRT). The phase II SABR-COMET trial, which enrolled patients with oligometastatic disease of multiple histologies and randomized them to HIGRT vs. standard of care, found a notable survival advantage in favor of HIGRT. Other data suggest that HIGRT may synergize with immunotherapy by releasing powerful cytokines that increase anti-tumor immune surveillance and by recruiting tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, helping to overcome resistance to therapy. There are many ongoing trials exploring the role of ablative therapy, most notably HIGRT, with or without immunotherapy, for the treatment of oligometastatic breast cancer.We believe that patients with oligometastatic breast cancer should be offered enrollment on prospective clinical trials when possible. Outside the context of a clinical trial, we recommend that select patients with oligometastatic breast cancer be offered treatment with a curative approach, including ablative therapy to all sites of disease if it can be safely accomplished. Currently, selection criteria to consider for ablative therapy include longer disease-free interval from diagnosis to metastasis (>2 years), fewer metastases, and fewer involved organs. Undoubtedly, new data will refine or even upend our understanding of the definition and optimal management of oligometastatic disease.

Mature Experiences Using Local Therapy for Oligometastases

Cancer is a heterogeneous disease, consisting of a spectrum of disorders ranging from local-only disease to those that are widely metastatic from their onset. The oligometastatic state, in which tumors harbor a limited number of metastases, may be curable in a subset of patients. The early success of surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer led to investigations into metastatectomy of other sites and, more recently, into the use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for oligometastatic disease. This article reviews the data establishing the role of surgery for managing limited metastatic disease. Further, we review recent experiences using alternative local therapies, such as SABR, for oligometastases. This review also discusses ongoing trials evaluating local therapies for patients with a limited burden of metastatic cancer.

Limited Liver or Lung Colorectal Cancer Metastases. Systemic Treatment, Surgery, Ablation or SBRT

The prognosis for oligometastatic colorectal cancer has improved in recent years, mostly because of recent advances in new techniques and approaches to the treatment of oligometastases, including new surgical procedures, better systemic treatments, percutaneous ablation, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). There are several factors to consider when deciding on the better approach for each patient: tumor factors (metachronous or synchronous metastases, RAS mutation, BRAF mutation, disease-free interval, size and number of metastases), patient factors (age, frailty, comorbidities, patient preferences), and physicians' factors (local expertise). These advances have presented major challenges and opportunities for oncologic multidisciplinary teams to treat patients with limited liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer with a curative intention. In this review, we describe the different treatment options in patients with limited liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer, and the possible combination of three approaches: systemic treatment, surgery, and local ablative treatments.

Evolutions of the Management of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Bibliometric Analysis

Background: Tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRCLM) in recent decades, and thousands of papers have been published. Therefore, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of articles related to CRCLM treatment to explore its evolution. Materials and Methods: The Clarivate Analytics Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection database was searched through June 2020 using terms related to CRCLM treatment. We analyzed the bibliographic information of the literature related to CRCLM treatment and explored the research topics to understand its evolution over time. Results: We identified 3436 records related to CRCLM treatment in the WOS database. The total number of times these documents were cited ranged 0-2352, and the years of publication spanned 1976-2020. The greatest numbers of articles were published in the United States, Japan, and France. Among institutions, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, and Oslo University Hospital published the most articles. Regarding authors, Jarnagin WR, Adam R, Vauthey JN published the most articles. The research topics of these articles included systemic chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, the outcome of liver resection, prognosis prediction, hepatic artery infusion, radiofrequency ablation, and two-stage hepatectomy. Conclusion: Bibliometric analysis of studies related to CRCLM treatment can help doctors and researchers quickly understand the development trend in this field. These data emphasize the current management of patients with CRCLM, and they can potentially guide the direction of future research.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

Technological advances have enabled well tolerated and effective radiation treatment for small liver metastases. Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) refers to ablative dose delivery (>100 Gy BED) in five fractions or fewer. For larger tumors, the safe delivery of SABR can be challenging due to a more limited volume of healthy normal liver parenchyma and the proximity of the tumor to radiosensitive organs such as the stomach, duodenum, and large intestine. In addition to stereotactic treatment delivery, controlling respiratory motion, the use of image guidance, adaptive planning and increasing the number of radiation fractions are sometimes necessary for the safe delivery of SABR in these situations. Magnetic Resonance (MR) image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (MRgART) is a new and rapidly evolving treatment paradigm. MR imaging before, during and after treatment delivery facilitates direct visualization of both the tumor target and the adjacent normal healthy organs as well as potential intrafraction motion. Real time MR imaging facilitates non-invasive tumor tracking and treatment gating. While daily adaptive re-planning permits treatment plans to be adjusted based on the anatomy of the day. MRgART therapy is a promising radiation technology advance that can overcome many of the challenges of liver SABR and may facilitate the safe tumor dose escalation of colorectal liver metastases.

Extending hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy to tumours larger than 70cc - effects and side effects

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for tumours ≥5 cm is poorly studied and its utility and feasibility is uncertain. We here report the Karolinska experience of SBRT in this setting.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients had a gross tumour volume (GTV) ≥70 cc, a prescribed physical dose of at least 40 Gy and received treatment between 1995-2012.

RESULTS

We included 164 patients with 175 tumours located in the thorax (n = 86), the liver (n = 27) and the abdomen (n = 62) and treated with a median prescribed dose (BED_α/β 10Gy) of 80 Gy (71.4-113). One- and 2- year local control rates were 82% and 61%. In multivariate analyses, minimum dose to the GTV and histological subtype were associated with local control. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) histology showed the most favourable local control - 94% at 2 years for all histologies. Thirty-seven patients experienced grade 3-5 toxicity most likely related to SBRT. Seven of the ten patients with grade 5 toxicity, had a centrally located tumour in the thorax.

CONCLUSION

SBRT of tumours >5 cm in diameter may be an option for peripherally located lung and abdominal tumours. Histological origin and tumour location should be considered before treatment.

Locoregional Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Options Beyond Resection

Colorectal cancer was the third most common malignancy worldwide in 2018, and most patients present with or develop distant metastases. Colorectal liver metastases are most commonly observed because of the vascular drainage of the colon and superior rectum. Current guidelines recommend surgical resection as first-line treatment; however, 80% to 90% of patients with colorectal liver metastases are ineligible for primary resection. For patients with unresectable disease, a multidisciplinary treatment approach is favored, incorporating systemic therapy and a toolbox of local ablative therapies. These treatments either aim at cytoreduction to enable a conversion to surgical resectability or control of disease progression and spread. Each of these treatments carries unique outcomes and risk profiles, thereby contributing to an individualized treatment strategy for patients with colorectal liver metastases. This review summarizes evidence on hepatic artery infusion, stereotactic body radiation therapy, thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluding beads, and transarterial radioembolization for treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Results of large-scale prospective and retrospective studies and international guidelines are discussed to provide detailed background on the current and prospective use of local ablative techniques in management of colorectal liver metastases.

Safety and Survival Rates Associated With Ablative Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Patients With Oligometastatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The oligometastatic paradigm postulates that patients with a limited number of metastases can be treated with ablative local therapy to each site of disease with curative intent. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is a radiation technique that has become widely used in this setting. However, prospective data are limited and are mainly from single institutional studies.

Objective

To conduct a meta-analysis to characterize the safety and clinical benefit of SABR in oligometastatic cancer.

Data Sources

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature on December 23, 2019, that included prospective clinical trials and review articles that were published within the past 15 years.

Study Selection

Inclusion criteria were single-arm or multiarm prospective trials including patients with oligometastatic cancer (ie, ≤5 sites of extracranial disease), and SABR was administered in less than or equal to 8 fractions with greater than or equal to 5 Gy/fraction.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes and Study Design; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses; and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology methods were used to identify eligible studies. Study eligibility and data extraction were reviewed by 3 authors independently. Random-effects meta-analyses using the Knapp-Hartung correction, arcsine transformation, and restricted maximum likelihood method were conducted.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Safety (acute and late grade 3-5 toxic effects) and clinical benefit (1-year local control, 1-year overall survival, and 1-year progression-free survival).

Results

Twenty-one studies comprising 943 patients and 1290 oligometastases were included. Median age was 63.8 years (interquartile range, 59.6-66.1 years) and median follow-up was 16.9 months (interquartile range, 13.7-24.5 months). The most common primary sites were prostate (22.9%), colorectal (16.6%), breast (13.1%), and lung (12.8%). The estimate for acute grade 3 to 5 toxic effect rates under the random-effects models was 1.2% (95% CI, 0%-3.8%; I2 = 50%; 95% CI, 3%-74%; and τ = 0.20%; 95% CI, 0.00%-1.43%), and the estimate for late grade 3 to 5 toxic effects was 1.7% (95% CI, 0.2%-4.6%; I2 = 54%; 95% CI, 11%-76%; and τ = 0.25%; 0.01%-1.00%). The random-effects estimate for 1-year local control was 94.7% (95% CI, 88.6%-98.6%; I2 = 90%; 95% CI, 86%-94%; and τ = 0.81%; 95% CI, 0.36%-2.38%]). The estimate for 1-year overall survival was 85.4% (95% CI, 77.1%-92.0%; I2 = 82%; 95% CI, 71%-88%; and τ = 0.72%; 95% CI, 0.30%-2.09%) and 51.4% (95% CI, 42.7%-60.1%; I2 = 58%; 95% CI, 17%-78%; and τ = 0.20%; 95% CI, 0.02%-1.21%) for 1-year progression-free survival.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this meta-analysis, SABR appears to be relatively safe in patients with oligometastatic cancer with clinically acceptable rates of acute and late grade 3 to 5 toxic effects less than 13% and with clinically acceptable rates of 1-year local control overall survival, and progression-free survival. These findings are hypothesis generating and require validation by ongoing and planned prospective clinical trials.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Versatile, Well-Tolerated, and Effective Treatment Option for Extracranial Metastases From Primary Ovarian and Uterine Cancer

Purpose

Single extracranial metastases from ovarian and uterine malignancies have historically been treated with surgery or conventional radiation. We report mature local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and toxicity for patients who completed 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Methods

Patients with biopsy-proven, single extracranial metastases from primary ovarian and uterine malignancies treated with 5-fraction SBRT were included. Patients were stratified based on tumor volume (small < 50 cc or large ≥ 50 cc) and dose (low dose < 35 Gy or high ≥ 35 Gy). Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate LC, OS, and PFS.

Results

Between July 2007 and July 2012, 20 patients underwent SBRT to a single extracranial metastasis. Primary site was divided evenly between ovarian and uterine (n = 10 each). Metastases involved the liver (30%), abdominal lymph nodes (25%), lung (20%), pelvic lymph nodes (10%), spine (10%), and extremity (5%). The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 42.5 cc (range, 5–273 cc) and the median dose to the GTV was 35 Gy (range, 30–50 Gy). At a median follow-up of 56 months, the 5-year LC and OS estimates were 73 and 46%. When stratified by tumor volume, the 5-year LC and OS for small tumors were significantly better at 100% (p < 0.01) and 65% (p < 0.02). When stratified by dose, the 5-year LC was 87.5% with high dose and 53.6% with low dose (p = 0.035). The 5-year PFS for the entire cohort was 20%. Four patients with small metastases who had complete response remained disease free at study completion and were considered cured (median PFS > 10 years). Treatment was generally well tolerated, and only one patient experienced a late grade III musculoskeletal SBRT related toxicity.

Conclusions

SBRT is a versatile, well-tolerated, and effective treatment option for single extracranial metastases from ovarian and uterine primary tumors. 35 Gy in five fractions appears to be a practical minimum effective dose. Four patients with small metastases were disease free at the study completion and considered cured. However, patients with larger metastases (≥50 cc) may require higher SBRT dosing or alternative treatments.

Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours

Malignant liver tumours include a wide range of primary and secondary tumours. Although surgery remains the mainstay of curative treatment, modern therapies integrate a variety of neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies and have achieved dramatic improvements in survival. Extensive tumour loads, which have traditionally been considered unresectable, are now amenable to curative treatment through systemic conversion chemotherapies followed by a variety of interventions such as augmentation of the healthy liver through portal vein occlusion, staged surgeries or ablation modalities. Liver transplantation is established in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but is now emerging as a promising option in many other types of tumour such as perihilar cholangiocarcinomas, neuroendocrine or colorectal liver metastases. In this Review, we summarize the available therapies for the treatment of malignant liver tumours, with an emphasis on surgical and ablative approaches and how they align with other therapies such as modern anticancer drugs or radiotherapy. In addition, we describe three complex case studies of patients with malignant liver tumours. Finally, we discuss the outlook for future treatment, including personalized approaches based on molecular tumour subtyping, response to targeted drugs, novel biomarkers and precision surgery adapted to the specific tumour.

A single-institutional experience with low dose stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases

AIM

This study reports a single-institutional experience treating liver metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

107 patients with 169 lesions were assessed to determine factors predictive for local control, radiographic response, and overall survival (OS). Machine learning techniques, univariate analysis, and the Kaplan-Meier method were utilized.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with a relatively low median dose of 30 Gy in 3 fractions. Fractions were generally delivered once weekly. Median biologically effective dose (BED) was 60 Gy, and the median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 12.16 cc. Median follow-up was 7.36 months. 1-year local control was 75% via the Kaplan-Meier method. On follow-up imaging, 43%, 40%, and 17% of lesions were decreased, stable, and increased in size, respectively. 1-year OS was 46% and varied by primary tumor, with median OS of 34.3, 25.1, 12.5, and 4.6 months for ovarian, breast, colorectal, and lung primary tumors, respectively. Breast and ovarian primary patients had better OS (p < 0.0001), and lung primary patients had worse OS (p = 0.032). Higher BED values, the number of hepatic lesions, and larger GTV were not predictive of local control, radiographic response, or OS. 21% of patients suffered from treatment toxicity, but no grade ≥3 toxicity was reported.

CONCLUSION

Relatively low-dose SBRT for liver metastases demonstrated efficacy and minimal toxicity, even for patients with large tumors or multiple lesions. This approach may be useful for patients in whom higher-dose therapy is contraindicated or associated with high risk for toxicity. OS depends largely on the primary tumor.

External Beam Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) commonly is used for small liver metastases. Modern conformal radiotherapy techniques, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy, enable the safe delivery of SABR to small liver volumes. For larger tumors, the safe delivery of SABR can be challenging due to a more limited volume of healthy normal liver parenchyma and the proximity of the tumor to radiosensitive organs, such as the stomach, duodenum, and large intestine. Controlling respiratory motion, the use of image guidance, and increasing the number of radiation fractions sometimes are necessary for the safe delivery of SABR in these situations.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: size matters

PURPOSE

We analysed our initial experience with SBRT in liver metastasis from colorectal cancer at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January/2014 and December/2017, 22 patients with 31 LMCCR were treated. Local control (LC) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. We analysed potential prognostic factors for LC: sex, PTV size, number of LM and the radiation scheme.

RESULTS

Median age: 69 years. Prior chemotherapy or local liver treatments: 81.8% and 63.6% of patients, respectively. SBRT consisted of 3 × 20 Gy (42.9%) and 3 × 15 Gy (31.4%). There were 88.5% responses (57.1% CR and 31.4% PR). Median follow-up was 30 months. LC per lesion at 12 and 24 months was 85.3% and 61.8%, respectively. Tumour volumes > 30 cc correlated with worsened 2-year-control rates (90% vs 34.5%) (p = 0.005). There was only a patient with CTC-grade 3 toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver SBRT is a safe and effective treatment that achieves high local control rates. We found a significant correlation between larger LMCRC and worse local control.

Disease course of lung oligometastatic colorectal cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been shown to increase survival rates in oligometastatic disease (OMD), but local control of colorectal metastases remains poor. We aimed to explore the natural course of oligometastatic colorectal cancer and to investigate how SBRT of lung metastases can delay the progression to polymetastatic disease (PMD).

METHODS

107 lung oligometastases in 38 patients were treated with SBRT at a single institution. The median number of treated lesions was 2 (range 1-5). Time to PMD (ttPMD) was defined as the time from SBRT to the occurrence of >5 new metastases. Genetic biomarkers such as EGFR, KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability were investigated as predictive factors for response rates.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 28 months. At median follow-up, 7 patients were free from disease and 31 had progression: 18 patients had sequential oligometastatic disease (SOMD) and 13 polymetastatic progression. All SOMD cases received a second SBRT course. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months (range 4-9 months); median ttPMD was 25.8 months (range 12-39 months) with 1‑ and 2‑year PFS rates of 62.5% and 53.4%, respectively. 1‑ and 2‑year local PFS (LPFS) rates were 91.5% and 80%, respectively. At univariate analysis, BRAF wildtype correlated with better LPFS (p = 0.003), SOMD after primary SBRT was associated with longer cancer-specific survival (p = 0.031). Median overall survival (OS) was 39.5 months (range 26-64 months) and 2‑year OS was 71.1%.

CONCLUSION

The present results support local ablative treatment of lung metastases using SBRT in oligometastatic colorectal cancer patients, as it can delay the transition to PMD. Patients who progressed as SOMD maintained a survival advantage compared to those who developed PMD.

Association of tumor genomic factors and efficacy for metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To report tumor genomic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and local failure (LF) for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who received metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with CRC who received metastasis-directed SBRT. Tumor genomic alterations were identified through KRAS, BRAF, or a 50-gene next generation sequencing panel. OS and LF were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and competing-risk methods.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients and 109 lesions were treated between 2008 and 2018. The median patient follow-up was 50 months (IQR: 28-107). The median and 5-year OS was 34 months and 26% (95% CI: 16-41%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of LF was 30% (95% CI: 23-41%). Univariate associates with OS included patient age ≥60 years, bone metastasis, increasing tumor size, KRAS mutation, and combined KRAS and TP53 mutation, while increasing tumor size, bone metastasis, biologically effective dose <100 Gy, and combined KRAS and TP53 mutation were associated with LF. Multivariate associates with OS included patient age ≥60 years (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-4.8, p = 0.01), lesion size per 1 cm (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5, p < 0.01), and KRAS mutation (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.3, p < 0.01), while no multivariable model for LF retained more than a single variable.

CONCLUSION

Genomic factors, in particular KRAS and TP53 mutation, may assist in patient selection and radiotherapeutic decision-making for patients with oligometastatic CRC. Prospective validation, ideally with genomic correlation of all irradiated metastases, is warranted.