Integration of Telemedicine Consultation Into a Tertiary Radiation Oncology Department: Predictors of Use, Treatment Yield, and Effects on Patient Population

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic led to rapid expansion of telemedicine. The implications of telemedicine have not been rigorously studied in radiation oncology, a procedural specialty. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics of in-person patients (IPPs) and virtual patients (VPs) who presented to a large cancer center before and during the pandemic and to understand variables affecting likelihood of receiving radiotherapy (yield) at our institution.

METHODS

A total of 17,915 patients presenting for new consultation between 2019 and 2021 were included, stratified by prepandemic and pandemic periods starting March 24, 2020. Telemedicine visits included video and telephone calls. Area deprivation indices (ADIs) were also compared.

RESULTS

The overall population was 56% male and 93% White with mean age of 63 years. During the pandemic, VPs accounted for 21% of visits, were on average younger than their in-person (IP) counterparts (63.3 years IP v 62.4 VP), and lived further away from clinic (215 miles IP v 402 VP). Among treated VPs, living closer to clinic was associated with higher yield (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; P < .001). This was also seen among IPPs who received treatment (OR, 0.96; P < .001); however, the average distance from clinic was significantly lower for IPPs than VPs (205 miles IP v 349 VP). Specialized radiotherapy (proton and brachytherapy) was used more in VPs. IPPs had higher ADI than VPs. Among VPs, those treated had higher ADI (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patient characteristics and yield were significantly different between IPPs and VPs. Telemedicine increased reach to patients further away from clinic, including from rural or health care-deprived areas, allowing access to specialized radiation oncology care. Telemedicine has the potential to increase the reach of other technical and procedural specialties.

Assessment of minimum target dose as a predictor of local failure after spine SBRT

OBJECTIVES

Metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated robust clinical benefits in carefully selected patients, improving local control and even overall survival (OS). We assess a large database to determine clinical and dosimetric predictors of local failure after spine SBRT.

METHODS

Spine SBRT treatments with imaging follow-up were identified. Patients were treated with a simultaneous integrated boost technique using 1 or 3 fractions, delivering 20-24 Gy in 1 fraction to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and 16 Gy to the low dose volume (or 27-36 Gy and 21-24 Gy for 3 fraction treatments). Exclusions included: lack of imaging follow-up, proton therapy, and benign primary histologies.

RESULTS

522 eligible spine SBRT treatments (68 % single fraction) were identified in 377 unique patients. Patients had a median OS of 43.7 months (95 % confidence interval: 34.3-54.4). The cumulative incidence of local failure was 10.5 % (7.4-13.4) at 1 year and 16.3 % (12.6-19.9) at 2 years. Local control was maximized at 15.3 Gy minimum dose for single-fraction treatment (HR = 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.17 - 0.56, p < 0.0001) and confirmed via multivariable analyses. Cumulative incidence of local failure was 6.1 % (2.6-9.4) vs. 14.2 % (8.3-19.8) at 1 year using this cut-off, with comparable findings for minimum 14 Gy. Additionally, epidural and soft tissue involvement were predictive of local failure (HR = 1.77 and 2.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Spine SBRT offers favorable local control; however, minimum dose to the GTV has a strong association with local control. Achieving GTV minimum dose of 14-15.3 Gy with single fraction SBRT is recommended whenever possible.

Participant Evaluation of a Multi-disciplinary Oncology Preceptorship Training Program for Oncology Health Professionals from Kumasi, Ghana

A critical shortage of skilled healthcare workers is a primary cause of disparate global cancer outcomes. We report participant evaluation of a multidisciplinary preceptorship program. In collaboration with the city of Kumasi, Ghana, Mayo Clinic and the City Cancer Challenge hosted a preceptorship program for comprehensive multidisciplinary breast and cervix cancer training. A total of 14 healthcare workers from Kumasi received two weeks of training at Mayo Clinic in November and December 2021. Each participant and preceptor were requested to complete an anonymous post-participation survey. Of the 14 trainee participants, 10 (71%) completed the survey. All respondents found the program "valuable and applicable to their clinical practice." Ninety percent reported they were able to "review effective and critical elements in the development and expansion of the multidisciplinary team" and able to "solve practical clinical cases as a team". General themes of satisfaction included: (1) organization and administration, (2) clinical observations and demonstrations, (3) guidelines development, and (4) recognizing the central importance of cultivating a team-based approach. Of the 40 preceptors, 16 (40%) completed the survey. All respondents reported they felt the training would meaningfully "influence patient care in Ghana", that participation "added value or joy to their clinical practice," and all wished to "participate in future preceptorship programs". After a focused two-week program, trainees reported high satisfaction, usefulness from observing specialized cancer care, and value in closely observing a multidisciplinary oncology team. Preceptors reported the experience added joy and perspective to their clinical practice and wished to participate in future programs.

Comparison of Hounsfield units and vertebral bone quality score for the prediction of time to pathologic fracture in mobile spine metastases treated with radiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Spine metastases are commonly treated with radiotherapy for local tumor control; pathologic fracture is a potential complication of spinal radiotherapy. Both Hounsfield units (HUs) on CT and vertebral bone quality (VBQ) on MRI have been argued to predict stability as measured by odds of pathologic fracture, although it is unclear if there is a difference in the predictive power between the two methodologies. The objective of the present study was to examine whether one methodology is a better predictor of pathologic fracture following radiotherapy for mobile spine metastases.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radiotherapy (conventional external-beam radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, or intensity-modulated radiation therapy) for mobile spine (C1-L5) metastases at a tertiary care center were retrospectively identified. Details regarding underlying pathology, patient demographics, and tumor morphology were collected. Vertebral involvement was assessed using the Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) system. Bone quality of the non-tumor-involved bone was assessed on both pretreatment CT and MRI. Univariable analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of fracture, and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to identify significant predictors of time to pathologic fracture. Stepwise Cox regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of time to fracture.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included (mean age 62.7 ± 11.9 years; 61% male), of whom 35 experienced postradiotherapy pathologic fractures. The most common histologies were lung (22%), prostate (21%), breast (14%), and renal cell (13%). On univariable analysis, the mean HUs of the vertebrae adjacent to the fractured vertebra were significantly lower among those experiencing fracture; VBQ was not significantly associated with fracture odds. Survival analysis showed that average HUs ≤ 132, nonprostate pathology, involvement of ≥ 3 vertebral body segments on the WBB system, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 7, and the presence of axial pain all predicted increased odds of fracture (all p < 0.001). Cox regression found that HUs ≤ 132 (OR 2.533, 95% CI 1.257-5.103; p = 0.009), ≥ 3 WBB vertebral body segments involved (OR 2.376, 95% CI 1.132-4.987; p = 0.022), and axial pain (OR 2.036, 95% CI 0.916-4.526; p = 0.081) predicted increased fracture odds, while prostate pathology predicted decreased odds (OR 0.076, 95% CI 0.009-0.613; p = 0.016). Sensitivity analysis suggested that an HU threshold of ≤ 132 and a SINS of ≥ 7 identified patients at increased risk of fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that bone density surrogates as measured on CT, but not MRI, can be used to predict the risk of pathologic fracture following radiotherapy for mobile spine metastases. More extensive vertebral body involvement and the presence of mechanical axial pain additionally predict increased fracture odds.

Sublobar Resection, Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, and Percutaneous Ablation Provide Comparable Outcomes for Lung Metastasis-Directed Therapy

BACKGROUND

Prolonged survival of patients with metastatic disease has furthered interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT).

RESEARCH QUESTION

There is a paucity of data comparing lung MDT modalities. Do outcomes among sublobar resection (SLR), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and percutaneous ablation (PA) for lung metastases vary in terms of local control and survival?.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Medical records of patients undergoing lung MDT at a single cancer center between January 2015 and December 2020 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and toxicity outcomes were collected. Patient and lesion characteristics were used to generate multivariable models with propensity weighted analysis.

RESULTS

Lung MDT courses (644 total: 243 SLR, 274 SBRT, 127 PA) delivered to 511 patients were included with a median follow-up of 22 months. There were 47 LP events in 45 patients, and 159 patients died. Two-year OS and LP were 80.3% and 63.3%, 83.8% and 9.6%, and 4.1% and 11.7% for SLR, SBRT, and PA, respectively. Lesion size per 1 cm was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; P = .003) and LP (HR, 1.50; P < .001). There was no difference in OS by modality. Relative to SLR, there was no difference in risk of LP with PA; however, SBRT was associated with a decreased risk (HR, 0.26; P = .023). Rates of severe toxicity were low (2.1%-2.6%) and not different among groups.

INTERPRETATION

This study performs a propensity weighted analysis of SLR, SBRT, and PA and shows no impact of lung MDT modality on OS. Given excellent local control across MDT options, a multidisciplinary approach is beneficial for patient triage and longitudinal management.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for Large Brain Metastases: Dosimetric and Clinical Predictors of Local Progression and Radionecrosis

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides high rates of local control for small brain metastases with low rates of radionecrosis (RN). Larger targets are associated with increased risk of both local progression (LP) and RN. In this analysis, we hypothesized that dosimetric and clinical parameters predict for risk of LP and RN in SRS targets larger than two centimeters.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with one or more targets with either an intact versus post-operative cavity larger than 2.0 cm treated with LINAC-based SRS between 2017 and 2022 at one institution. We assessed for association between patient, treatment, and disease variables with LP and RN. Variables assessed included tumor resection status, PDL1 positivity, target volume, maximum and minimum target dose, EQD2 and BED (a/b = 2 for necrosis and a/b = 10 for tumor control), as well as receipt of steroids, bevacizumab, or systemic therapy before or after SRS. Radionecrosis was determined by characteristic radiographic changes. Analyses were performed for the entire cohort and within subsets including by resection status and dose fractionation.

RESULTS

A total of 178 lesions in 143 patients were included. Targets with volume diameters measuring at least 2 cm were used. Median follow-up was 2.3 years. Overall survival at 1 and 2 years was 56% and 32%, respectively. Most lesions (n = 119) were resected and treated with SRS post-operatively. The most common dose and fractionation schemes used were 30 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 89) and 27 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 63). For the entire cohort, the cumulative incidence of LP 1 and 2 years was 26% and 34%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of radiographic radionecrosis at 1 and 2 years was 12% and 17%, respectively. There was no difference in LP or RN between 27 Gy in 3 fractions versus 30 Gy in 5 fractions (p>0.5 for both). Median planning target volume (PTV) size was 18.5 cc for the 27 Gy in 3 fraction group compared to 21.9 cc in the 30 Gy in 5 fraction group. Minimum or maximum dose within the target was not associated with increased risk of LP or RN. Among patients receiving 27 Gy in 3 fractions, patients treated with resection followed by SRS had lower risk of LP compared to those treated with SRS alone (HR: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.64, p = 0.011). Among patients receiving 30 Gy in 5 fractions, patients who received corticosteroids prior to SRS had a lower risk of RN (HR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.03-0.66, p = 0.013). For the entire cohort as well as within all subgroups, PD-L1≥1% was associated with increased risk of RN (p<0.001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Selecting the optimal SRS dose fractionation and planning parameters to minimize both LP and RN remains a challenge for large targets. In this analysis, 27 Gy in 3 fractions appeared to provide equivalent LP and RN compared to 30 Gy in 5 fractions, and may be more convenient for patients. Patients with PD-L1≥1% with large brain targets treated with SRS may be at increased risk of RN; corticosteroid prophylaxis may be considered in this population.

"Moderately Hypofractionated" Radiotherapy with a Simultaneously Integrated Boost for Synchronous Treatment of Prostate and Anorectal Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Data suggest safety and efficacy of 1.8-2.0 Gy per day radiotherapy (RT) with sequential boost regimens for patients with synchronous prostate and anorectal cancers. Emergence of 25-28 fraction (fx) prostate cancer RT regimens has enabled simultaneously integrated boost techniques to treat the prostate and anorectum (HypoRT), but limited reports exist to support the safety or efficacy of this approach. We aimed to assess oncologic outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PRO)- and physician-reported adverse effects (AEs) of HypoRT for patients with synchronous prostate and anorectal cancers.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients synchronously diagnosed with prostate and rectal cancer or anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treated with a HypoRT technique and concurrent chemotherapy between 2014-2022. Outcomes included prostate cancer biochemical recurrence (BCR), anorectal cancer recurrence, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) AEs and PRO were prospectively collected using common terminology criteria for AEs (CTCAE) and PRO-CTCAE.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included. Patients had ECOG 0-1; median age was 71 years (51-82). Rectal cancer (n = 11) characteristics included T3 (91%), N1-2 (73%), M0 (73%); 3 had M1a disease suitable for curative-intent treatment. One patient had T2N1M0 ASCC. Prostate cancer risk groups included low (9%), intermediate (45%), and high/very high risk (46%). HypoRT included 45-50 and 67.5 Gy in 25 fx (33%), 46.8-52 and 70.2 Gy in 26 fx (17%), and 44.8-56 and 70 Gy in 28 fx (50%), to the pelvis-anorectum and prostate. Patients with rectal cancer received concurrent capecitabine. Nine (82%) patients with rectal cancer had surgical resection; 1 was R1. The patient with ASCC received concurrent 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C. Six patients (50%) received androgen suppression. All patients completed treatment successfully but 1 patient with rectal cancer did require hospitalization with treatment break due to GI AEs. Median follow was 60 months (13-103). Oncologic outcomes and AEs are in the table. No patient experienced prostate cancer BCR or ASCC progression. Four of 11 patients with rectal cancer progressed including 3 distant metastases, each amongst initial M1a patients, and 1 local-regrowth in a patient managed non-operatively.

CONCLUSION

HypoRT can effectively be utilized for patients with synchronous prostate and anorectal cancer. Physician assessed AEs compared favorably with prior data, however, further work is needed to understand differences in physician and patient experience. HypoRT may serve as another suitable option in the management of this complex clinical scenario.

Local Control after Re-Irradiation of Spinal Metastases with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Determine local control (LC) rate and risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) and radiation myelitis (RM) for patients receiving re-irradiation of spinal metastases (SMs) using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from large single-institutional experience with long follow-up.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Retrospectively identified patients receiving re-irradiation SBRT (rSBRT, 1, 3, or 5 fractions) to SMs previously treated with radiation therapy (RT) and having follow up imaging to assess local control. 1 fraction patients typically received 20-24 Gy and 16-18 Gy to the high- and low-risk planning target volumes (PTVs), respectively, and 27-39 Gy and 21-24 Gy for the 3 fraction patients, with a single level of 50 Gy for 5 fractions. Patient and treatment characteristics for previous RT (pRT) and rSBRT were collected, including histology and dose-volume histogram statistics (DVH). Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence (competing with death) of local failure with death as a competing risk was computed for the whole cohort and stratified by radioresistance of histology, and risk of VCF for RM (for treatments at L1 and above) and 95% confidence intervals. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) for PTV and spinal cord (SC) DVH statistics was computed for each individual course and cumulatively, using a/b = 10 Gy for tumor and 2 Gy for SC.

RESULTS

Identified 107 lesions in 91 patients. 48 (45%) had radioresistant histologies. For all patients, at 1 and 2 years, respectively OS was 64% (55-74%) and 43% (34-55%), LC was 88% (81-94%) and 85% (78-91%) with median follow-up of 52 months (Table 1). OS and LC were not significantly different between radiosensitivity groups (p>0.05). Risk of VCF at 1 and 2 years was 7% (3-13%) and 9% (4-16%). RM was identified in 1 patient, who received 30 Gy in 5 fractions to T1, and had 1-fraction rSBRT 21 months later. SC Dmax was 31.5 Gy for pRT and 10.4 Gy, for rSBRT, resulting in total SC EQD2 of 73 Gy. RM was confirmed on MRI 8 months after rSBRT. Cumulative RM risk at 8 months after rSBRT was estimated at 1% (0-4%). Median EQD2 for the minimum dose to the high and low risk PTVs were 17.7 Gy (interquartile range, IQR, 13.0-27.6 Gy) and 13.7 Gy (IQR, 10.8-19.3 Gy) for rSBRT, and maximum EQD to SC for previous RT, rSBRT, and cumulatively was 38 Gy (IQR, 30-41 Gy), 27 Gy (IQR, 22-36 Gy), and 65 Gy (IQR, 54-73 Gy).Re-irradiation of spinal metastasis with SBRT can be delivered safely and provide high rates of local control, including for radioresistant tumors, as demonstrated with the longest reported follow-up in this setting.

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation of SM with SBRT provides high rates of LC even for radioresistant tumors, and low risk of VCF and RM, based on the longest reported follow-up in this setting.

Non-Operative Management of Rectal or Anal Canal Adenocarcinoma: National Cancer Database Analysis of the Impact of Disease, Treatment, and Social Determinants of Health on Overall Survival

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

For select patients with rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma (RA-ACA), a non-operative management (NOM) strategy utilizing definitive radiotherapy (RT) has emerged as an option with the goal to improve quality of life compared with surgical management while maintaining similar oncologic outcomes. Disease and treatment characteristics as well as social determinants of health have been associated with access to care and health outcomes, and we hypothesized that such factors would impact overall survival (OS) amongst patients who received a NOM approach. The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of patient demographics, disease characteristics, and social determinants of health on OS amongst those receiving NOM utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified patients at least 18 of years of age diagnosed with clinical stage 1-3 RA-ACA from 2004-2018. The NOM cohort included patients who received RT and either refused surgery or surgery was not recommended in their treatment. Patients were excluded if receipt of chemotherapy or RT were unknown, received RT to a site outside of the pelvis, or received palliative-intent treatment. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess characteristics associated with OS. Analyses were performed using STATA (version 17, College Station, TX). A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 12,409 patients were identified as the NOM cohort. The median OS was 48.8 months (95% CI: 46.8-50.6). On MVA, variables associated with poorer OS included age ≥ 70 vs 50-69, male sex, Charlson-Deyo Score ≥ 1 vs 0, insurance status (no insurance, Medicaid or Medicare vs. private), geographical region (South, Midwest or West vs. Northeast), rural urban density vs metro/urban, treatment in a community facility vs academic, year of diagnosis (2004-2011 vs. 2012-2018), clinical T4 vs T1, clinical N1 or N2 vs N0, and grade 3 vs 1 (all p<0.05). Treatment with a RT dose < 45 Gy vs. 45-54 Gy (HR: 2.24, 95% CI: 2.07-2.44), but not > 55 Gy vs. 45-54 Gy, and omission of chemotherapy (HR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.16-1.43) were associated with poorer OS.

CONCLUSION

Patient, disease, treatment, and social determinants of health may influence OS amongst patients with RA-ACA who receive a NOM approach. Further work is needed to determine if the influence on OS can be explained, in part, by patients' lack of access to the intense surveillance necessary and/or the potential need for subsequent surgical management. Heightened awareness of these differential outcomes is needed to assist in patient selection and to successfully address barriers in access to optimize outcomes for patients who receive NOM.

Electrocardiogram with Artificial Intelligence Assessment as a Predictor of Cardiac Events and Overall Survival in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (RT) has demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit in esophageal cancer and constitutes part of the standard of care trimodality therapy. Unfortunately, subsequent cardiac toxicity can reduce the benefit of treatment. Our group aimed to study whether data from electrocardiograms (ECGs) could predict clinical outcomes and cardiac events after RT for esophageal cancer, allowing for identification of and early intervention for patients at high risk for cardiac toxicity.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Included patients received at least 41.4 Gy of pre-operative or definitive photon or proton RT for esophageal cancer from 2015 through July 2022. All ECGs were assessed using a previously validated artificial intelligence assessment for atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced ejection fraction (rEF) (Noseworthy et al. Lancet 2022). The model determined propensities for the development of multiple cardiac events, including AF and heart failure (HF). Medical records were reviewed for cardiac events and conditions prior to and after RT.

RESULTS

A cohort of 491 patients was assembled, with 301, 121, and 364 patients having an ECG prior to, during, and after RT, respectively. Of these, 84% had malignancy in the lower third of the esophagus and 48% underwent esophagectomy. At last follow-up relative to baseline assessment, patients had increased propensity for rEF (median 0.013, interquartile range (IQR): 0.001-0.038 vs. median 0.022, IQR: 0.011-0.074, p < 0.0001) and AF (median 0.16, IQR: 0.04-0.40 vs. median 0.048, IQR: 0.01-0.19, p < 0.0001). Increases in AF propensity were associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.10 per 0.1 increase, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-1.17, p = 0.0071). Baseline rEF propensity was predictive of future HF events (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.07-1.22, p < 0.001) for all patients or after excluding the 172 (35%) patients with baseline HF (HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.19-1.76, p < 0.001). Among patients who did not have HF prior to radiotherapy, the development of HF was associated with reduced OS (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.10-2.32, p = 0.014). Currently available cardiac dosimetric parameters, including heart mean/max doses, did not significantly correlate with cardiac outcomes. Patients who underwent esophagectomy had improved OS (HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82, p = 0.0008) and were not more likely to develop cardiac toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This analysis suggests that chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer can have significant impacts on a patient's propensity for cardiac events, which are associated with reduced OS. ECGs carry the potential to identify patients at greater risk for such events, and baseline ECGs with artificial intelligence assessment could select patients for increased surveillance or early intervention to further optimize the therapeutic ratio of RT.

Patient-Reported Adverse Effects in 15-Fraction Pancreatic Cancer Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Fifteen-fraction radiotherapy (RT) regimens have emerged as a standard option in the treatment of patients with pancreas cancer. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during and after pancreas cancer RT have not been well characterized. There is an even greater paucity of data among patients treated with 15-fraction regimens. We aimed to characterize gastrointestinal (GI) PROs in a cohort of patients treated with 15-fraction pancreas RT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This was an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study including patients with primary pancreas tumors treated with pre-operative or definitive 15-fraction RT from 2013 to 2022. PROs, including anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, stool incontinence, and abdominal pain, were prospectively collected and characterized per PRO-common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). Acute PROs were defined as occurring during RT through 110 days post-RT but prior to oncological surgery. Grade 3 or 4 PROs were respectively scored as "quite a bit" or "very much" in symptom interference questions, "frequently" or "almost constantly" in symptom frequency questions, and "severe" or "very severe" in symptom severity questions.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients were analyzed. Patient characteristics included a median age of 67 years (IQR: 60 - 72), ECOG 0-1 (96%), and male sex (56%). Most patients had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (96%). Resectability status included resectable (12%), borderline resectable (46%), and locally advanced (42%). 37% had lymph node involvement. 97% of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 98% received concurrent chemotherapy, most commonly with 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine (88%) or gemcitabine (11%). 99% were treated with intensity modulated RT. Median RT dose was 4500 cGy (IQR 4500 - 4500) to gross disease with margin and 3750 cGy (IQR 3750 - 3750) to elective nodal regions. 59% proceeded with oncologic resection. Grade 3 or higher acute PROs are demonstrated in the table.

CONCLUSION

Often considered more sensitive than physician assessments, PROs provide vital metrics that allow for a better understanding of the patient experience during cancer treatment. We report a comprehensive assessment of prospectively collected PROs per standardized PRO-CTCAE with the goals of raising awareness of the patient experience during 15-fraction pancreas cancer RT and helping guide future clinical trial designs focused on patient quality of life endpoints.

Assessment of Minimum Dose as a Strong Predictor of Local Failure after Spine SBRT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has demonstrated robust clinical benefits in carefully selected patients, improving local control and even overall survival (OS). Even so, a wide range of dose-fractionation schemes are used in clinical practice. We seek to assess a large database to determine clinical and dosimetric predictors of local failure after spine SBRT.

MATERIALS/METHODS

From a large institutional database, spine SBRT treatments with subsequent imaging follow-up to assess local control were identified. Patients were treated with a simultaneous integrated boost technique using 1 or 3 fractions, generally delivering 20-24 Gy in 1 fraction to the high dose volume and 16 Gy to the low dose volume (or 30-36 Gy and 24 Gy for 3 fraction treatments). Exclusions included: lack of imaging follow-up, proton therapy, and benign primary histologies. Statistical analyses included Cox proportional hazards analyses and the robust log-rank statistic for cut-point analysis. The cumulative incidence of local failure with death as a competing risk was considered as the primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A total of 522 eligible spine SBRT treatments (68% single fraction) were identified in 377 unique patients. Patients had a median OS of 43.7 months (95% confidence interval: 34.3-54.4). The cumulative incidence of local failure was 19.3% (15.3-23.2) at 1 year and 25.6% (21.1-29.9) at 2 years. Univariate analysis identified that the minimum dose (normalized for the prescription dose) was a strong predictor of local failure (p = 0.0093). Among patients treated with a single fraction, statistical significance was maintained (p = 0.024). No other dosimetric factors were predictive of local failure. In a cut point analysis, the log-rank statistic was maximized at 15.8 Gy minimum dose for single-fraction treatment (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34 - 0.75, p = 0.0009). Cumulative incidence of local failure was 15.1% (9.8-20.2) vs. 24.7% (17.2-31.5) at 1 year using this cut-off. Comparable local control was demonstrated with a minimum dose of 14 Gy (HR = 0.57, 95%: 0.37 - 0.87, p = 0.009), with reduced local control with lower minimum doses. Among a range of clinical factors assessed, only epidural and soft tissue involvement were predictive of local failure (HR = 1.80 and 1.98, respectively). Multivariable analyses incorporating soft tissue involvement, epidural extension, and multilevel disease confirmed the 15.8 Gy cutoff for single fraction cases (HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.38-0.88, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Spine SBRT offers favorable local control using a range of dose-fractionation schemes; however, minimum dose has a strong association with local control, unlike any other dosimetric factors tested. Furthermore, statistical significance was maintained even when considering epidural extension and potential limitations from dose to the spinal cord. Our data suggests that the minimum dose should be prioritized during treatment planning, ideally to at least 14 - 15.8 Gy for single fraction.

Validation of the Prognostic Index for Spine Metastasis (PRISM) Score for Stratifying Survival in Patients Treated with Spinal Stereotactic Radiosurgery

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Stereotactic spinal radiosurgery (SSRS) has been increasingly utilized as a first-line treatment for the management of spine metastases due to its ability to prolong survival and improve symptom control. Studies have shown that SSRS is helpful for select patients; however, there is no universal scoring system utilized to predict patient response to treatment. The Prognostic Index for Spinal Metastases (PRISM) score was shown to predict the likelihood of patients benefiting from SSRS. We sought to further demonstrate its generalizability by performing validation with a large dataset from a second high-volume institution.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We performed a retrospective review from 2017-2019 of 424 patients treated with SSRS at a single institution. Patients were stratified on the previously described PRISM criteria: Female sex (+2), solitary bone disease (+3), performance status (0 through +3.5), prior surgery at the SSRS site (+1), number of other metastatic sites (-N), prior radiation at the SSRS site (-1), and latency to treatment ≥ 5 months (+3). Patients were grouped based on PRISM scores: >7, Group 1; 4-7, Group 2; 1-3, Group 3; <1 Group 4. There were 89, 188, 88, and 59 patients in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Most patients were male (70%) with a performance status of 0 (53%). The most common tumor histologies were prostate (34%), renal (18%), and lung (11%). The median biological effective dose (BED10) was 60 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 60-82). We performed Cox proportional hazards analysis on overall survival (OS) based on PRISM score and patient and tumor characteristics. Concordance indices created from PRISM criteria and the multivariate Cox proportional analysis were compared.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 50.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.8-54.7) with a median overall survival of 30.3 months (95% CI, 27.3-38.4). The median overall survivals for PRISM Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 57.1, 37, 23.7, and 8.8 months, respectively. There were significant differences in overall survival among PRISM groups with hazard ratios of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.35-0.69; P<0.001) for Group 1, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.55-0.91); P<0.007) for Group 2, 1,45 (95% CI, 1.08-1.94); P = 0.010) for Group 3, and 3.47 (95% CI, 2.56-4.70; P<0.001) for Group 4. Multivariable Cox analysis for patient and tumor characteristics revealed only the number of organs involved and performance status as significant clinicopathologic prognostic attributes. However, the C-index using the PRISM criteria was 0.76, which was superior to the C-index when using the significant clinicopathologic attributes by themselves (0.71).

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate robust validation of the PRISM score to stratify OS in patients treated with SSRS and may help guide optimal treatment selection in prospective trials and clinical settings.

Single Institutional Experience Using Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumor Primary and Metastatic Lesions

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

The role of radiation therapy (RT) in the treatment of patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has not been well established. We aim to report on our experience using RT as part of curative or palliative treatment in patients with NET.

MATERIALS/METHODS

This was an IRB approved single-institutional retrospective cohort study including patients with NET who received curative- or palliative-intent RT from 2013-2022. Outcomes included cumulative incidence of local progression (LP) and overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate methods were used to assess disease and treatment characteristics associated with outcomes. RT dose was converted to biologically effective dose (BED10), assuming α/β = 10 Gy.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients who received treatment to 89 total lesions were included for analysis. The median age at RT was 56 years (range: 20-95). ECOG performance status was 0-1 in 49 and 56% were male. Primary tumor origin included: 28 pancreas, 12 lung, 8 small intestine, 5 colorectal, 2 stomach, and 11 unknown/other primary cancers. Tumor grade included 1 (62%), 2 (1%), 3 (17%) or unknown (18%). 20% were functional. 43% of patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis, 24 were initially M0 and developed M1 disease in their disease course, and 12 remained M0. RT was delivered to the primary tumor (59%) or metastatic sites (41%). Treatment was either curative-intent (37%), including "curative" intent oligometastasis direct therapy, or palliative-intent (63%). For the 27 patients with M1 disease at time of RT, 1 had all sites controlled by local therapies at the time of RT. The location of the treated lesions included 17 pancreas, 13 bone, 12 thorax, 4 colorectal, 3 small bowel, and 15 other. Median RT dose and number of fractions were 30 Gy (IQR: 20-45) and 5 (IQR: 5-15). The median BED10 was 48 (IQR: 28-65) for all lesions and 60 (IQR: 58-69) for lesions treated curatively. 21 (32%) patients received concurrent systemic therapy with RT. The median follow-up per patient and per lesion were 15 months (IQR: 6-33) and 13 months (IQR: 5-28). The median OS was 34.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.6-NE). The 3-year cumulative incidence of local progression was 15% (95% CI: 8-28%). BED10 was not associated with LP.

CONCLUSION

These data support the use of RT as a highly effective local treatment modality in the care of patients with either localized or metastatic NET.

Conventional versus hypofractionated postmastectomy proton radiotherapy in the USA (MC1631): a randomised phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Proton therapy is under investigation in breast cancer as a strategy to reduce radiation exposure to the heart and lungs. So far, studies investigating proton postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) have used conventional fractionation over 25-28 days, but whether hypofractionated proton PMRT is feasible is unclear. We aimed to compare conventional fractionation and hypofractionation in patients with indications for PMRT, including those with immediate breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We did a randomised phase 2 trial (MC1631) at Mayo Clinic in Rochester (MN, USA) and Mayo Clinic in Arizona (Phoenix, AZ, USA) comparing conventional fractionated (50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy [relative biological effectiveness of 1·1]) and hypofractionated (40·05 Gy in 15 fractions of 2·67 Gy [relative biological effectiveness of 1·1]) proton PMRT. All patients were treated with pencil-beam scanning. Eligibility criteria included age 18 years or older, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and breast cancer resected by mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction with indications for PMRT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either conventional fractionation or hypofractionation, with presence of immediate reconstruction (yes vs no) as a stratification factor, using a biased-coin minimisation algorithm. Any patient who received at least one fraction of protocol treatment was evaluable for the primary endpoint and safety analyses. The primary endpoint was 24-month complication rate from the date of first radiotherapy, defined as grade 3 or worse adverse events occurring from 90 days after last radiotherapy or unplanned surgical interventions in patients with immediate reconstruction. The inferiority of hypofractionation would not be ruled out if the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CI for the difference in 24-month complication rate between the two groups was greater than 10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02783690, and is closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between June 2, 2016, and Aug 23, 2018, 88 patients were randomly assigned (44 to each group), of whom 82 received protocol treatment (41 in the conventional fractionation group and 41 in the hypofractionation group; median age of 52 years [IQR 44-64], 79 [96%] patients were White, two [2%] were Black or African American, one [1%] was Asian, and 79 [96%] were not of Hispanic ethnicity). As of data cutoff (Jan 30, 2023), the median follow-up was 39·3 months (IQR 37·5-61·2). The median mean heart dose was 0·54 Gy (IQR 0·30-0·72) for the conventional fractionation group and 0·49 Gy (0·25-0·64) for the hypofractionation group. Within 24 months of first radiotherapy, 14 protocol-defined complications occurred in six (15%) patients in the conventional fractionation group and in eight (20%) patients in the hypofractionation group (absolute difference 4·9% [one-sided 95% CI 18·5], p=0·27). The complications in the conventionally fractionated group were contracture (five [12%] of 41 patients]) and fat necrosis (one [2%] patient) requiring surgical intervention. All eight protocol-defined complications in the hypofractionation group were due to infections, three of which were acute infections that required surgical intervention, and five were late infections, four of which required surgical intervention. All 14 complications were in patients with immediate expander or implant-based reconstruction.

INTERPRETATION

After a median follow-up of 39·3 months, non-inferiority of the hypofractionation group could not be established. However, given similar tolerability, hypofractionated proton PMRT appears to be worthy of further study in patients with and without immediate reconstruction.

FUNDING

The Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, the Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA, and the US National Cancer Institute.

Comparing Oncologic Outcomes and Toxicity for Combined Modality Therapy vs. Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Previously Irradiated Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer

No standard treatment paradigm exists for previously irradiated locally recurrent rectal cancer (PILRRC). Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may improve oncologic outcomes and reduce toxicity compared with combined modality therapy (CMT). Eighty-five patients treated at Institution A with CIRT alone (70.4 Gy/16 fx) and eighty-six at Institution B with CMT (30 Gy/15 fx chemoradiation, resection, intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT)) between 2006 and 2019 were retrospectively compared. Overall survival (OS), pelvic re-recurrence (PR), distant metastasis (DM), or any disease progression (DP) were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier model, with outcomes compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. Acute and late toxicities were compared, as was the 2-year cost. The median time to follow-up or death was 6.5 years. Median OS in the CIRT and CMT cohorts were 4.5 and 2.6 years, respectively (p ≤ 0.01). No difference was seen in the cumulative incidence of PR (p = 0.17), DM (p = 0.39), or DP (p = 0.19). Lower acute grade ≥ 2 skin and GI/GU toxicity and lower late grade ≥ 2 GU toxicities were associated with CIRT. Higher 2-year cumulative costs were associated with CMT. Oncologic outcomes were similar for patients treated with CIRT or CMT, although patient morbidity and cost were lower with CIRT, and CIRT was associated with longer OS. Prospective comparative studies are needed.

Early Impact of Proton Beam Therapy on Electrophysiological Characteristics in a Porcine Model

BACKGROUND

Particle therapy is a noninvasive, catheter-free modality for cardiac ablation. We previously demonstrated the efficacy for creating ablation lesions in the porcine heart. Despite several earlier studies, the exact mechanism of early biophysical effects of proton and photon beam delivery on the myocardium remain incompletely resolved.

METHODS

Ten normal and 9 infarcted in situ porcine hearts received proton beam irradiation (40 Gy) delivered to the left ventricular myocardium with follow-up for 8 weeks. High-resolution electroanatomical mapping of the left ventricular was performed at baseline and follow-up. Bipolar voltage amplitude, conduction velocity, and connexin-43 were determined within the irradiated and nonirradiated areas.

RESULTS

The irradiated area in normal hearts showed a significant reduction of bipolar voltage amplitude (10.1±4.9 mV versus 5.7±3.2, P<0.0001) and conduction velocity (85±26 versus 55±13 cm/s, P=0.03) beginning at 4 weeks after irradiation. In infarcted myocardium after irradiation, bipolar voltage amplitude of the infarct scar (2.0±2.9 versus 0.8±0.7 mV, P=0.008) was significantly reduced as well as the conduction velocity in the infarcted heart (43.7±15.7 versus 26.3±11.4 cm/s, P=0.02). There were no significant changes in bipolar voltage amplitude and conduction velocity in nonirradiated myocardium. Myocytolysis, capillary hyperplasia, and dilation were seen in the irradiated myocardium 8 weeks after irradiation. Active caspase-3 and reduction of connexin-43 expression began in irradiated myocardium 1 week after irradiation and decreased over 8 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Irradiation of the myocardium with proton beams reduce connexin-43 expression, conduction velocity, and bipolar conducted electrogram amplitude in a large porcine model. The changes in biomarkers preceded electrophysiological changes after proton beam therapy.

Development and validation of a recursive partitioning analysis-based pretreatment decision-making tool identifying ideal candidates for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

This study was aimed at developing and validating a decision-making tool predictive of overall survival (OS) for patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases.

METHODS

Three hundred sixty-one patients at one institution were used for the training set, and 182 at a second institution were used for external validation. Treatments most commonly involved one or three fractions of spine SBRT. Exclusion criteria included proton therapy and benign histologies.

RESULTS

The final model consisted of the following variables and scores: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 6 (1), time from primary diagnosis < 21 months (1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status = 1 (1) or ECOG performance status > 1 (2), and >1 organ system involved (1). Each variable was an independent predictor of OS (p < .001), and each 1-point increase in the score was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-2.25; p < .0001). The concordance value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.78). The scores were discretized into three groups-favorable (score = 0-1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor survival (score = 3-5)-with 2-year OS rates of 84% (95% CI, 79%-90%), 46% (95% CI, 36%-59%), and 21% (95% CI, 14%-32%), respectively (p < .0001 for each). In the external validation set (182 patients), the score was also predictive of OS (p < .0001). Increasing SINS<zaq;6> was predictive of decreased OS as a continuous variable (p < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel score is proposed as a decision-making tool to help to optimize patient selection for spine SBRT. SINS may be an independent predictor of OS.

Risk stratification of postoperative cardiopulmonary toxicity after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer

Purpose/objective

Postoperative toxicity for esophageal cancer impacts patient quality of life and potentially overall survival (OS). We studied whether patient and toxicity parameters post-chemoradiation therapy predict for post-surgical cardiopulmonary total toxicity burden (CPTTB) and whether CPTTB was associated with short and long-term outcomes.

Materials/methods

Patients had biopsy-proven esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy. CPTTB was derived from total perioperative toxicity burden (Lin et al. JCO 2020). To develop a CPTTB risk score predictive for major CPTTB, recursive partitioning analysis was used.

Results

From 3 institutions, 571 patients were included. Patients were treated with 3D (37%), IMRT (44%), and proton therapy (19%). 61 patients had major CPTTB (score ≥ 70). Increasing CPTTB was predictive of decreased OS (p<0.001), lengthier post-esophagectomy length of stay (LOS, p<0.001), and death or readmission within 60 days of surgery (DR60, p<0.001). Major CPTTB was also predictive of decreased OS (hazard ratio = 1.70, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.47, p=0.005). The RPA-based risk score included: age ≥ 65, grade ≥ 2 nausea or esophagitis attributed to chemoradiation, and grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity attributed to chemoradiation. Patients treated with 3D radiotherapy had inferior OS (p=0.010) and increased major CPTTB (18.5% vs. 6.1%, p<0.001).

Conclusion

CPTTB predicts for OS, LOS, and DR60. Patients with 3D radiotherapy or age ≥ 65 years and chemoradiation toxicity are at highest risk for major CPTTB, predicting for higher short and long-term morbidity and mortality. Strategies to optimize medical management and reduce toxicity from chemoradiation should be strongly considered.

Cardiopulmonary Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has the potential to reduce radiation dose to normal organs when compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We hypothesized that IMPT is associated with a reduced rate of cardiopulmonary toxicities in patients with Stage III NSCLC when compared with IMRT.

METHODS

We analyzed 163 consecutively treated patients with biopsy-proven, stage III NSCLC who received IMPT (n = 35, 21%) or IMRT (n = 128, 79%). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), freedom-from distant metastasis (FFDM), freedom-from locoregional relapse (FFLR), and cardiopulmonary toxicities (CTCAE v5.0) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Univariate cox regressions were conducted for the final model.

RESULTS

Median follow-up of surviving patients was 25.5 (range, 4.6-58.1) months. Median RT dose was 60 (range, 45-72) Gy [RBE]. OS, FFDM, and FFLR were not different based on RT modality. IMPT provided significant dosimetric pulmonary and cardiac sparing when compared to IMRT. IMPT was associated with a reduced rate of grade more than or equal to 3 pneumonitis (HR 0.25, P = .04) and grade more than or equal to 3 cardiac events (HR 0.33, P = .08). Pre-treatment predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide less than equal to 57% (HR 2.8, P = .04) and forced expiratory volume in the first second less than equal to 61% (HR 3.1, P = .03) were associated with an increased rate of grade more than or equal to 3 pneumonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

IMPT is associated with a reduced risk of clinically significant pneumonitis and cardiac events when compared with IMRT without compromising tumor control in stage III NSCLC. IMPT may provide a safer treatment option, particularly for high-risk patients with poor pretreatment pulmonary function.

Preoperative stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of brain metastases and gliomas

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is the delivery of a high dose ionizing radiation in a highly conformal manner, which allows for significant sparing of nearby healthy tissues. It is typically delivered in 1-5 sessions and has demonstrated safety and efficacy across multiple intracranial neoplasms and functional disorders. In the setting of brain metastases, postoperative and definitive SRS has demonstrated favorable rates of tumor control and improved cognitive preservation compared to conventional whole brain radiation therapy. However, the risk of local failure and treatment-related complications (e.g. radiation necrosis) markedly increases with larger postoperative treatment volumes. Additionally, the risk of leptomeningeal disease is significantly higher in patients treated with postoperative SRS. In the setting of high grade glioma, preclinical reports have suggested that preoperative SRS may enhance anti-tumor immunity as compared to postoperative radiotherapy. In addition to potentially permitting smaller target volumes, tissue analysis may permit characterization of DNA repair pathways and tumor microenvironment changes in response to SRS, which may be used to further tailor therapy and identify novel therapeutic targets. Building on the work from preoperative SRS for brain metastases and preclinical work for high grade gliomas, further exploration of this treatment paradigm in the latter is warranted. Presently, there are prospective early phase clinical trials underway investigating the role of preoperative SRS in the management of high grade gliomas. In the forthcoming sections, we review the biologic rationale for preoperative SRS, as well as pertinent preclinical and clinical data, including ongoing and planned prospective clinical trials.

A Phase II prospective study of hypofractionated proton therapy of prostate and pelvic lymph nodes: Acute effects on patient-reported quality of life

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to report acute changes in patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL) using the 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC-26) questionnaire in a prospective study using hypofractionated intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (H-IMPT) targeting the prostate and the pelvic lymph nodes for high-risk or unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients were enrolled. H-IMPT consisted of 45 GyE to the pelvic lymph nodes and 67.5 GyE to the prostate and seminal vesicles in 25 fractions. PRQOL was assessed with the urinary incontinence (UI), urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (UO), and bowel function (BF) domains of EPIC-26 questionnaire. Mean changes in domain scores were analyzed from pretreatment to the end of treatment and 3 months posttreatment. A clinically meaningful change (or minimum important change) was defined as a score change > 50% of the baseline standard deviation.

RESULTS

The mean scores of UO, UI, and BF at baseline were 84.6, 91.1, and 95.3, respectively. At the end of treatment, there were statistically significant and clinically meaningful declines in UO and BF scores (-13.5 and -2.3, respectively), while the decline in UI score was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful (-13.7). A clinically meaningful decline in UO, UI, and BF scores occurred in 53.5%, 22.7%, and 73.2% of the patients, respectively. At 3 months posttreatment, all three mean scores showed an improvement, with fewer patients having a clinically meaningful decline in UO, UI, and BF scores (18.4%, 20.5%, and 45.0%, respectively). There was no significant reduction in the mean UO and UI scores compared to baseline, although the mean BF score remained lower than baseline and the difference was clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

UO, UI, and BF scores of PRQOL declined at the end of H-IMPT. UO and UI scores showed improvement at 3 months posttreatment and were similar to the baseline scores. However, BF score remained lower at 3 months posttreatment with a clinically meaningful decline.

FDG-PET Predicts Neoadjuvant Therapy Response and Survival in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is used in borderline resectable/locally advanced (BR/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Anatomic imaging (CT/MRI) poorly predicts response, and biochemical (CA 19-9) markers are not useful (nonsecretors/nonelevated) in many patients. Pathologic response highly predicts survival post-NAT, but is only known postoperatively. Because metabolic imaging (FDG-PET) reveals primary tumor viability, this study aimed to evaluate our experience with preoperative FDG-PET in patients with BR/LA PDAC in predicting NAT response and survival.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with resected BR/LA PDAC who underwent NAT with FDG-PET within 60 days of resection. Pre- and post-NAT metabolic (FDG-PET) and biochemical (CA 19-9) responses were dichotomized in addition to pathologic responses. We compared post-NAT metabolic and biochemical responses as preoperative predictors of pathologic responses and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

We identified 202 eligible patients. Post-NAT, 58% of patients had optimization of CA 19-9 levels. Major metabolic and pathologic responses were present in 51% and 38% of patients, respectively. Median RFS and OS times were 21 and 48.7 months, respectively. Metabolic response was superior to biochemical response in predicting pathologic response (area under the curve, 0.86 vs 0.75; P&lt;.001). Metabolic response was the only univariate preoperative predictor of OS (odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.40), and was highly correlated (P=.001) with pathologic response as opposed to biochemical response alone. After multivariate adjustment, metabolic response was the single largest independent preoperative predictor (P&lt;.001) for pathologic response (odds ratio, 43.2; 95% CI, 16.9-153.2), RFS (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), and OS (hazard ratio, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.1-0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with post-NAT resected BR/LA PDAC, FDG-PET highly predicts pathologic response and survival, superior to biochemical responses alone. Given the poor ability of anatomic imaging or biochemical markers to assess NAT responses in these patients, FDG-PET is a preoperative metric of NAT efficacy, thereby allowing potential therapeutic alterations and surgical treatment decisions. We suggest that FDG-PET should be an adjunct and recommended modality during the NAT phase of care for these patients.

Single and multi-fraction spine stereotactic body radiation therapy and the risk of radiation induced myelopathy

Purpose

This study reports on the risk of radiation-induced myelitis (RM) of the spinal cord from a large single-institutional experience with 1 to 5 fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the spine.

Methods and Materials

A retrospective review of patients who received spine SBRT to a radiation naïve level at or above the conus medullaris between 2007 and 2019 was performed. Local failure determination was based on SPIne response assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. RM was defined as neurologic symptoms consistent with the segment of cord irradiated in the absence of neoplastic disease recurrence and graded by Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Rates of adverse events were estimated and dose-volume statistics from delivered treatment plans were extracted for the planning target volumes and spinal cord.

Results

A total of 353 lesions in 277 patients were identified that met the specified criteria, for which 270, 70, and 13 lesions received 1-, 3-, and 5-fraction treatments, respectively, with a median follow-up of 46 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 41-52 months) for all surviving patients. The median overall survival was 33.0 months (95% CI, 29-43). The median D0.03cc to the spinal cord was 11.7 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 10.5-12.4), 16.7 Gy (IQR, 12.8-20.6), and 26.0 Gy (IQR, 24.1-28.1), for 1-, 3-, 5-fractions. Using an a/b = 2Gy for the spinal cord, the median single-fraction equivalent-dose (SFED₂) was 11.7 Gy (IQR, 10.2-12.5 Gy) and the normalized biological equivalent dose (nBED_2/2) was 19.9 Gy (IQR, 15.4-22.8 Gy). One patient experienced grade 2 RM after a single-fraction treatment. The cumulative probability of RM was 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-2%).

Conclusions

Spine SBRT is safe while limiting the spinal cord (as defined on treatment planning magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography myelogram) D0.03cc to less than 14 Gy, 21.9 Gy, and 30 Gy, for 1, 3, and 5-fractions, consistent with standard guidelines.

Independent predictors of vertebral compression fracture following radiation for metastatic spine disease

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine independent risk factors for vertebral compression fracture (VCF) following radiation for metastatic spine disease, including low bone mineral density as estimated by Hounsfield units (HU).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified patients with a single vertebral column metastasis treated with radiation therapy, a pretreatment CT scan, and a follow-up CT scan at least 6 weeks after treatment. Patients with primary spine tumors, preradiation vertebroplasty, preradiation spine surgery, prior radiation to the treatment field, and proton beam treatment modality were excluded. The HU were measured in the vertebral bodies at the level superior to the metastasis, within the tumor and medullary bone of the metastatic level, and at the level inferior to the metastasis. Variables collected included basic demographics, Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS), presenting symptoms, bone density treatment, primary tumor pathology, Weinstein-Boriani-Biagini (WBB) classification, Enneking stage, radiation treatment details, chemotherapy regimen, and prophylactic vertebroplasty.

RESULTS

One hundred patients with an average age of 63 years and average follow-up of 18 months with radiation treatment dates ranging from 2017 to 2020 were included. Fifty-nine patients were treated with external-beam radiation therapy, with a median total dose of 20 Gy (range 8-40 Gy). Forty-one patients were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy, with a median total dose of 24 Gy (range 18-39 Gy). The most common primary pathologies included lung (n = 22), prostate (n = 21), and breast (n = 14). Multivariable logistic regression analysis (area under the curve 0.89) demonstrated pretreatment HU (p < 0.01), SINS (p = 0.02), involvement of ≥ 3 WBB sectors (p < 0.01), primary pathology other than prostate (p = 0.04), and ongoing chemotherapy treatment (p = 0.04) to be independent predictors of postradiation VCF. Patients with pretreatment HU < 145 (n = 32), 145-220 (n = 31), and > 220 (n = 37) had a fracture rate of 59%, 39%, and 11%, respectively. An HU cutoff of 157 was found to maximize sensitivity (71%) and specificity (75%) in predicting postradiation VCF.

CONCLUSIONS

Low preradiation HU, higher SINS, involvement of ≥ 3 WBB sectors, ongoing chemotherapy, and nonprostate primary pathology were independent predictors of postradiation VCF in patients with metastatic spine disease. Low bone mineral density, as estimated by HU, is a novel and potentially modifiable risk factor for VCF.

Development and Assessment of a Predictive Score for Vertebral Compression Fracture After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Spinal Metastases

IMPORTANCE

Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a potential adverse effect following treatment with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and assess a risk stratification model for VCF after SBRT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study conducted at a high-volume referral center included 331 patients who had undergone 464 spine SBRT treatments from December 2007 through October 2019. Data analysis was conducted from November 1, 2020, to August 17, 2021. Exclusions included proton therapy, prior surgical intervention, vertebroplasty, or missing data.

EXPOSURES

One and 3 fraction spine SBRT treatments were most commonly delivered. Single-fraction treatments generally involved prescribed doses of 16 to 24 Gy (median, 20 Gy; range, 16-30 Gy) to gross disease compared with multifraction treatment that delivered a median of 30 Gy (range, 21-50 Gy).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The VCF and radiography components of the spinal instability neoplastic score were determined by a radiologist. Recursive partitioning analysis was conducted using separate training (70%), internal validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. The log-rank test was the criterion for node splitting.

RESULTS

Of the 331 participants, 88 were women (27%), and the mean (IQR) age was 63 (59-72) years. With a median follow-up of 21 months (IQR, 11-39 months), we identified 84 VCFs (18%), including 65 (77%) de novo and 19 (23%) progressive fractures. There was a median of 9 months (IQR, 3-21 months) to developing a VCF. From 15 candidate variables, 6 were identified using the backward selection method, feature importance testing, and a correlation heatmap. Four were selected via recursive partitioning analysis: epidural tumor extension, lumbar location, gross tumor volume of more than 10 cc, and a spinal instability neoplastic score of more than 6. One point was assigned to each variable, and the resulting multivariable Cox model had a concordance of 0.760. The hazard ratio per 1-point increase for VCF was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.62-2.30; P < .001). The cumulative incidence of VCF at 2 years (with death as a competing risk) was 6.7% (95% CI, 4.2%-10.7%) for low-risk (score, 0-1; 273 [58.3%]), 17.0% (95% CI, 10.8%-26.7%) for intermediate-risk (score, 2; 99 [21.3%]), and 35.4% (95% CI, 26.7%-46.9%) for high-risk cases (score, 3-4; 92 [19.8%]) (P < .001). Similar results were observed for freedom from VCF using stratification.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this cohort study identify a subgroup of patients with high risk for VCF following treatment with SBRT who may potentially benefit from undergoing prophylactic spinal stabilization or vertebroplasty.

Brain metastases, patterns of intracranial progression, and the clinical value of upfront cranial radiotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors

Background

Despite the emergence of programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs), knowledge gaps remain regarding the impact and timing of cranial radiotherapy for patients receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.

Methods

Data were collected from 461 consecutive patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy for metastatic NSCLC at three institutions between June 2017 and September 2020. Intracranial progressive disease (PD) at the original disease sites, new sites, or both sites were classified as original-site PD (OPD), new-site PD (NPD), and original-and-new-site PD (ONPD), respectively. Patients with baseline BMs were categorized based on whether they received upfront cranial radiotherapy (uCRT) at any time point between the introduction of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and the first subsequent progression.

Results

Of the 461 patients enrolled, 110 (23.9%) had BMs at baseline. The presence of BMs did not show independent prognostic value for progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). During a median follow-up of 13.2 months, 96 patients with BMs developed PD, of whom 53 (55.2%) experienced intracranial PD. OPD, NPD, and ONPD were observed in 50.9%, 18.9%, and 30.2% of patients, respectively. Patients who received uCRT exhibited a longer median OS than those with BMs who did not receive uCRT (25.4 vs. 14.6 months, HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29–0.91, P=0.041); this survival advantage was more prominent in patients with 1–4 BMs (median OS, 25.4 vs. 17.0 months, HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.22–0.81, P=0.024), and uCRT was independently associated with OS among these patients.

Conclusions

The presence of BMs at baseline was not associated with poorer OS in patients with metastatic NSCLC treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Intracranial progression on PD-l/PD-L1 inhibitors predominately occurred at the original BM sites. The use of uCRT may improve OS, especially in NSCLC patients with 1–4 BMs.

Focused versus conventional radiotherapy in spinal oncology: is there any difference in fusion rates and pseudoarthrosis?

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy is considered standard of care for adjuvant peri-operative treatment of many spinal tumors, including those with instrumented fusion. Unfortunately, radiation treatment has been linked to increased risk of pseudoarthrosis. Newer focused radiotherapy strategies with enhanced conformality could offer improved fusion rates for these patients, but this has not been confirmed.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients at three tertiary care academic institutions with primary and secondary spinal malignancies that underwent resection, instrumented fusion, and peri-operative radiotherapy. Two board certified neuro-radiologists used the Lenke fusion score to grade fusion status at 6 and 12-months after surgery. Secondary outcomes included clinical pseudoarthrosis, wound complications, the effect of radiation timing and radiobiological dose delivered, the use of photons versus protons, tumor type, tumor location, and use of autograft on fusion outcomes.

RESULTS

After review of 1252 spinal tumor patients, there were 60 patients with at least 6 months follow-up that were included in our analyses. Twenty-five of these patients received focused radiotherapy, 20 patients received conventional radiotherapy, and 15 patients were treated with protons. There was no significant difference between the groups for covariates such as smoking status, obesity, diabetes, intraoperative use of autograft, and use of peri-operative chemotherapy. There was a significantly higher rate of fusion for patients treated with focused radiotherapy compared to those treated with conventional radiotherapy at 6-months (64.0% versus 30.0%, Odds ratio: 4.15, p = 0.036) and 12-months (80.0% versus 42.1%, OR: 5.50, p = 0.022). There was a significantly higher rate of clinical pseudoarthrosis in the conventional radiotherapy cohort compared to patients in the focused radiotherapy cohort (19.1% versus 0%, p = 0.037). There was no difference in fusion outcomes for any of the secondary outcomes except for use of autograft. The use of intra-operative autograft was associated with an improved fusion at 12-months (66.7% versus 37.5%, OR: 3.33, p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Focused radiotherapy may be associated with an improved rate of fusion and clinical pseudoarthrosis when compared to conventional radiation delivery strategies in patients with spinal tumors. Use of autograft at the time of surgery may be associated with improved 12-month fusion rates. Further large-scale prospective and randomized controlled studies are needed to better stratify the effects of radiation delivery modality in these patients.

Evaluation of Pretreatment Magnetic Resonance Elastography for the Prediction of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease

Purpose

Magnetic resonance (MR) elastography (E) is a noninvasive technique for quantifying liver stiffness (LS) for fibrosis. This study evaluates whether LS is associated with risk of developing radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) in patients receiving liver-directed radiation therapy (RT).

Methods and Materials

Based on prior studies, LS ≤3 kPa was considered normal and LS >3.0 kPa as representing fibrosis. RILD was defined as an increase in Child-Pugh (CP) score of ≥2 from baseline within 1 year of RT. Univariate and multivariate Cox models were used to assess correlation.

Results

One hundred two patients, 51 with primary liver tumors and 51 with liver metastases, were identified with sufficient follow-up. In univariate models, pre-RT LS >3.0 kPa (hazard ratio [HR] 4.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-14; P = .004), body mass index (BMI), clinical cirrhosis, CP score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2, primary liver tumor, and mean liver dose were significantly associated with risk of post-RT RILD. In a multivariate analysis, LS >3.0 and mean liver dose both were significantly associated with RILD risk.

Conclusions

Elevated pre-RT LS is associated with an increased risk of RILD in patients receiving liver-directed RT.

Intact SMAD-4 is a predictor of increased locoregional recurrence in upfront resected pancreas cancer receiving adjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Previous reports suggest that intact SMAD4 expression is associated with a locally aggressive pancreas cancer phenotype. The objectives of this work were to determine the frequency of intact SMAD4 and its association with patterns of recurrence in patients with upfront resected pancreas cancer receiving adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A tissue microarray was constructed using resected specimens from patients who underwent upfront surgery and adjuvant gemcitabine with no neoadjuvant treatment for pancreas cancer. SMAD4 expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining. Associations of SMAD4 expression and clinicopathologic parameters with clinical outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-seven patients were included with a median follow up of 5.7 years. Most patients had stage ≥ pT3 tumors (75%) and pN1 (68%). All patients received adjuvant gemcitabine, and 79% of patients received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ten (8%) patients had intact SMAD4 expression. Grade was the only clinicopathologic parameter statistically associated with SMAD4 expression (P=0.05). Median overall survival was 2.1 years. On univariate analysis, SMAD4 expression was associated with increased locoregional recurrence (hazard ratio 7.0, P<0.01, 95% confidence interval: 2.8-18.0) but not distant recurrence (P=0.06) or overall survival (P=0.73). On multivariable analysis, SMAD4 expression (hazard ratio 9.6, P<0.01, 95% confidence interval: 3.7-24.8) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (hazard ratio 0.3, P=0.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-0.8) were associated with higher and lower locoregional recurrence, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with upfront resected pancreas cancer, SMAD4 expression was associated with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence. Prospective evaluation of the frequency of SMAD4 expression and validation of its predictive utility is warranted.

Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Clinical Experience

Purpose

Our purpose was to assess the safety and efficacy of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods and Materials

A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who were treated with IMPT for HCC with curative intent from June 2015 to December 2018. All patients had fiducials placed before treatment. Inverse treatment planning used robust optimization with 2 to 3 beams. The majority of patients were treated in 15 fractions (n = 30, 81%, 52.5-67.5 Gy, relative biological effectiveness), whereas the remainder were treated in 5 fractions (n = 7, 19%, 37.5-50 Gy, relative biological effectiveness). Daily image guidance consisted of orthogonal kilovoltage x-rays and use of a 6° of freedom robotic couch. Outcomes (local control, progression free survival, and overall survival) were determined using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were included. The median follow-up for living patients was 21 months (Q1-Q3, 17-30 months). Pretreatment Child-Pugh score was A5-6 in 70% of patients and B7-9 in 30% of patients. Nineteen patients had prior liver directed therapy for HCC before IMPT. Eight patients (22%) required a replan during treatment, most commonly due to inadequate clinical target volume coverage. One patient (3%) experienced a grade 3 acute toxicity (pain) with no recorded grade 4 or 5 toxicities. An increase in Child-Pugh score by ≥ 2 within 3 months of treatment was observed in 6 patients (16%). At 1 year, local control was 94%, intrahepatic control was 54%, progression free survival was 35%, and overall survival was 78%.

Conclusions

IMPT is safe and feasible for treatment of HCC.

Predicting Adverse Pathologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Resectable Pancreas Cancer With Preoperative CA 19-9

Background

We evaluated preoperative CA 19-9 levels in patients with resected pancreatic cancer to analyze whether they were predictive of clinical outcomes and could help select patients for additional therapy. We hypothesized that elevated CA 19-9 would be associated with worse pathologic findings and oncologic outcomes.

Methods

This study assessed 509 patients with non-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection at our institution from 1995-2011 and had preoperative CA 19-9 recorded. No patients received neoadjuvant therapy. CA 19-9 level was analyzed as a continuous and a dichotomized (> vs. ≤ 55 U/mL) variable using logistic and Cox models.

Results

Median follow-up was 7.8 years, and the median age was 66 years (33-90). 64% of patients had elevated preoperative CA 19-9 (median: 141 U/mL), that did not correlate with bilirubin level or tumor size. Most patients had ≥ T3 tumors (72%) and positive lymph nodes (62%). The rate of incomplete (R1 or R2) resection was 19%. Increasing preoperative CA 19-9 was associated with extra-pancreatic extension (p=0.0005), lymphovascular space invasion (p=0.0072), incomplete resection [HR (95% CI) 2.0 (1.2-3.5)], and lower OS [HR = 1.6 (1.3-2.0)]. Each doubling in preoperative CA 19-9 value was associated with an 8.3% increased risk of death [HR = 1.08 (1.02-1.15)] and a 10.0% increased risk of distant recurrence [HR = 1.10 (1.02-1.19)]. Patients classified as non-secretors had comparable outcomes to patients with normal CA 19-9.

Conclusions

Elevated preoperative CA 19-9 level was associated with adverse pathologic features, incomplete resection, and inferior clinical outcomes. Neither tumor size nor bilirubin confound an elevated CA 19-9 level. Preoperative CA 19-9 level may help select patients for additional therapy.

Intensity modulated radiotherapy for anal canal squamous cell carcinoma: A 16-year single institution experience

Introduction

To report long-term efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for patients with anal canal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC).

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective review of patients with ASCC who received curative-intent IMRT and concurrent chemotherapy (98%) between 2003 and 2019. Overall survival (OS), colostomy-free survival (CFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The cumulative incidence of local recurrence (LR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported. Acute and late AEs were recorded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AEs.

Results

127 patients were included. The median patient age was 63 years (interquartile range [IQR] 55-69) and 79% of patients were female. 33% of patients had T3-4 disease and 68% had clinically involved pelvic or inguinal lymph nodes (LNs).The median patient follow-up was 47 months (IQR: 28-89 months). The estimated 4-year OS, CFS, and PFS were 81% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73%-89%), 77% (95% CI: 68%-86%), and 78% (95% CI: 70%-86%), respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidences of LR, LRR, and DM were 3% (95% CI: 1%-9%), 9% (95% CI: 5%-17%), and 10% (95% CI: 6%-18%), respectively. Overall treatment duration greater than 39 days was associated with an increased risk of LRR (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 5.2, 95% CI: 1.4-19.5, p = 0.015). The most common grade 3+ acute AEs included hematologic (31%), gastrointestinal (GI) (17%), dermatologic (16%), and pain (15%). Grade 3+ late AEs included: GI (3%), genitourinary (GU) (2%), and pain (1%). Current smokers were more likely to experience grade 3+ acute dermatologic toxicity compared to former or never smokers (34% vs. 7%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

IMRT was associated with favorable toxicity rates and long-term efficacy. These data support the continued utilization of IMRT as the preferred treatment technique for patients with ASCC.

Identifying the prognostic significance of B3GNT3 with PD-L1 expression in lung adenocarcinoma

Background

As a novel treatment, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor appears to be less effective in tumors of lung adenocarcinoma patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. Beta-1,3-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase 3 (B3GNT3) has reported to be associated with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)/PD-1 interaction. However, the relationship between B3GNT3 and PD-L1 and its prognostic significance in

EGFR

mutant status are still unknown.

Methods

B3GNT3 was identified through transcriptome sequencing and The Cancer Genome Atlas Lung Adenocarcinoma (TCGA-LUAD) database. Flow cytometry and real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed to investigate the association between B3GNT3, PD-L1, and EGFR. Then, B3GNT3 and PD-L1 expression were evaluated by immunohistochemical analysis in 145 surgically resected primary lung adenocarcinomas. The relationships between survival and B3GNT3, PD-L1, and EGFR status were assessed, and the potential prognostic factors in patients with B3GNT3 expression were identified.

Results

We found that EGFR activation induced PD-L1 expression, and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) could reduce PD-L1 protein in EGFR-TKI-sensitive HCC827 and PC9 cell lines. Subsequent analysis showed that EGFR inhibitor could also lead to both decreased PD-L1 and B3GNT3 mRNA expression. A total of 145 lung adenocarcinoma patients were included. PD-L1 >1% and B3GNT3-positive expression in patients might contribute to worse prognosis in both overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR), 2.63; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.98–7.06; P=0.048] and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.13–8.14; P=0.019), especially in the PD-L1 ≥50% group. However, when patients were negative for B3GNT3, PD-L1, and EGFR (or “triple negative”), there were significant decreases in OS (HR, 5.44; 95% CI, 0.99–29.83; P=0.029) and DFS (HR, 7.24; 95% CI, 1.32–39.73; P=0.008). Positive B3GNT3 expression was a significant risk factor associated with lower DFS (HR, 3.30; P=0.043).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that the B3GNT3 expression is tightly correlated with PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutation status. B3GNT3 is associated with poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma patients. Collectively, these findings may offer new insight into enhancing immune therapy efficacy for lung adenocarcinoma patients.

Chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or unresectable extra-hepatic biliary cancer

Background

Although surgical resection is the preferred curative-intent treatment option for patients with non-metastatic, extra-hepatic biliary cancer (EBC), radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be utilized in select cases when surgical resection is not feasible. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with CRT for patients with locally advanced and unresectable EBC.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with EBC, including extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer, deemed inoperable who received RT between 1998 and 2018. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and 94% received concurrent 5-fluorouracil. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of RT. The cumulative incidence of local progression (LP), locoregional progression (LRP), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported with death as a competing risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess for correlation between patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes.

Results

Forty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median OS was 12.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-73.2 months]. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), 20% (95% CI: 11-36%), and 7% (95% CI: 2-20%), respectively. The 2-year PFS, LP, LRP, and DM were 21% (95% CI: 12-36%), 27% (95% CI: 17-44%), 31% (95% CI: 20-48%), and 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) >59.5 Gy₁₀ was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18-0.92, P=0.03] and PFS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.84, P=0.02) and primary tumor size (per 1 cm increase) was associated with worsened PFS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.63, P=0.04). BED >59.5 Gy₁₀ remained associated with PFS on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.78, P=0.01). Treatment-related grade 3+ acute and late gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

RT is associated with 3- and 5-year survival in a subset of patients with unresectable EBC. Further exploration of the role of RT as part of a multi-modality curative treatment strategy is warranted.

Intracranial long-term complications of radiation therapy: an image-based review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation therapy is commonly utilized in the majority of solid cancers and many hematologic malignancies and other disorders. While it has an undeniably major role in improving cancer survival, radiation therapy has long been recognized to have various negative effects, ranging from mild to severe. In this manuscript, we review several intracranial manifestations of therapeutic radiation, with particular attention to those that may be encountered by radiologists.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive literature review of known complications of intracranial radiation therapy. Based on this review, we selected complications that had salient, recognizable imaging findings. We searched our imaging database for illustrative examples of these complications, focusing only on patients who had a history of intracranial radiation therapy. We then selected cases that best exemplified expected imaging findings in these entities.

RESULTS

Based on our initial literature search and imaging database review, we selected cases of radiation-induced meningioma, radiation-induced glioma, cavernous malformation, enlarging perivascular spaces, leukoencephalopathy, stroke-like migraine after radiation therapy, Moyamoya syndrome, radiation necrosis, radiation-induced labyrinthitis, optic neuropathy, and retinopathy. Although retinopathy is not typically apparent on imaging, it has been included given its clinical overlap with optic neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

We describe the clinical and imaging features of selected sequelae of intracranial radiation therapy, with a focus on those most relevant to practicing radiologists. Knowledge of these complications and their imaging findings is important, because radiologists play a key role in early detection of these entities.

Does the dural resection bed need to be irradiated? Patterns of recurrence and implications for postoperative radiotherapy for temporal lobe gliomas

Background

Patterns of recurrence and survival with different surgical and radiotherapy (RT) techniques were evaluated to guide RT target volumes for patients with temporal lobe glioma.

Methods and Materials

This retrospective cohort study included patients with World Health Organization grades II to IV temporal lobe glioma treated with either partial (PTL) or complete temporal lobectomy (CTL) followed by RT covering both the parenchymal and dural resection bed (whole-cavity radiotherapy [WCRT]) or the parenchymal resection bed only (partial-cavity radiotherapy [PCRT]). Patterns of recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included and 84.3% of patients had high-grade glioma (HGG). CTL and PTL were performed for 11 (21.6%) and 40 (78.4%) patients, respectively. Median RT dose was 60 Gy (range, 40-76 Gy). There were 82.4% and 17.6% of patients who received WCRT and PCRT, respectively. Median follow-up time was 18.4 months (range, 4-161 months). Forty-six patients (90.2%) experienced disease recurrence, most commonly at the parenchymal resection bed (76.5%). No patients experienced an isolated dural recurrence. The median PFS and OS for the PCRT and WCRT cohorts were 8.6 vs 10.8 months (P = .979) and 19.9 vs 18.6 months (P = .859), respectively. PCRT was associated with a lower RT dose to the brainstem, optic, and ocular structures, hippocampus, and pituitary.

Conclusion

We identified no isolated dural recurrence and similar PFS and OS regardless of postoperative RT volume, whereas PCRT was associated with dose reduction to critical structures. Omission of dural RT may be considered a reasonable alternative approach. Further validation with larger comparative studies is warranted.

Radiation and immunotherapy: emerging mechanisms of synergy

Immunotherapy (IO) has become a standard treatment in patients with metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and is now being tested in patients with early stage disease. IO agents currently in use for lung cancer target PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4. While survival and tumor control have improved with IO, many patients have limited or short responses to IO. Therefore, methods to improve the systemic response to IO are needed. Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral component of lung cancer treatment, and may improve systemic response to IO by increasing antigen presentation, increasing co-stimulatory signaling, increasing T-cells recruitment, upregulating PD-L1, increasing tumor stromal lymphocyte infiltration, and altering the microenvironment. IO after definitive chemoradiation is now standard treatment in unresectable stage III NSCLC following publication of the PACIFIC clinical trial. For early stage NSCLC, IO is being investigated in conjunction with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The benefit of adding RT to IO in patients with metastatic disease may be especially pronounced in patients with low baseline PD-L1 expression, potentially when delivered as a short course of SBRT, as supported by the PEMBRO-RT clinical trial. Current and ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the optimal radiation dose, timing, and sequencing of RT with IO.

Glioblastoma Recurrence Versus Treatment Effect in a Pathology-Documented Series

OBJECTIVE

Patients diagnosed with glioblastoma (GBM) are treated with surgery followed by fractionated radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide. Patients are monitored with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, treatment-related changes frequently mimic disease progression. We reviewed a series of patients undergoing surgery for presumed first-recurrence GBM, where pathology reports were available for tissue diagnosis, in order to better understand factors associated with a diagnosis of treatment-related changes on final pathology.

METHODS

Patient records at a single institution between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Pathology reports were reviewed to determine diagnosis of recurrent GBM or treatment effect. Survival analysis was performed interrogating overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Correlation with radiation treatment plans was also examined.

RESULTS

One-hundred-twenty-three patients were identified. One-hundred-sixteen patients (94%) underwent resection and seven underwent biopsy. Treatment-related changes were reported in 20 cases (16%). These patients had longer median OS and PFS from the time of recurrence than patients with true disease progression. However, there was no significant difference in OS from the time of initial diagnosis. Treatment effect was associated with surgery within 90 days of completing radiation. In patients receiving radiation at our institution (n = 53), larger radiation target volume and a higher maximum dose were associated with treatment effect.

CONCLUSION

Treatment effect was associated with surgery nearer to completion of radiation, a larger radiation target volume, and a higher maximum point dose. Treatment effect was associated with longer PFS and OS from the time of recurrence, but not from the time of initial diagnosis.

Clinical Implementation of Preoperative Short-Course Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Patients With Rectal Cancer

Purpose

For treatment of rectal cancer, pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT) may reduce radiation exposure to normal tissues compared with 3-dimensional conformal photon radiation therapy (3DCRT) or volumetric modulated arc photon radiation therapy (VMAT). The purpose of this study was to report the clinical implementation and dosimetric analysis of preoperative short-course PBS-PT for rectal cancer.

Methods and Materials

Eleven patients with stage IIA-IVB rectal cancer received preoperative short-course (25 Gy in 5 fx) PBS-PT between 2018 and 2019 preceding curative-intent total mesorectal excision. PBS-PT plans were generated using single-field optimization with 2 posterior-oblique fields. Verification computed tomography scans were performed on the first 3 days of treatment. Each patient had a backup 3DCRT and VMAT plan.

Results

Clinical target volume coverage was similar between PBS-PT, 3DCRT, and VMAT. PBS-PT had statistically significant reductions in dose to the small bowel, large bowel, bladder, and femoral heads across multiple dosimetric parameters. All patients completed PBS-PT as planned without need for replanning. All computed tomography verification scans demonstrated good target coverage with clinical target volume V100 > 95%.

Conclusions

Preoperative short-course PBS-PT has been successfully implemented and offers a significant reduction of dose to normal tissues. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate if dosimetric advantages translate into clinical benefit.

Surgery for Mesothelioma After Radiation Therapy (SMART); A Single Institution Experience

Background: The optimal treatment sequence for localized malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is controversial. We aimed to assess outcomes and toxicities of treating localized MPM with neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). Methods: Patients were enrolled on an institutional protocol of surgery for mesothelioma after radiation therapy (SMART) between June 2016 and May 2017. Eligible patients were adults with MPM localized to the ipsilateral pleura. Patients underwent staging with PET/CT, pleuroscopy, bronchoscopy/EBUS, mediastinoscopy, and laparoscopy. Five fractions of RT were delivered using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with 30 Gy delivered to gross disease and 25 Gy to the entire pleura. EPP was performed 4-10 days following completion of RT. Results: Five patients were treated on protocol. Median age was 62 years (range 36-66). Histology was epithelioid on initial biopsy in all patients, but one was found to have biphasic histology after surgery. Three patients had surgeon-assessed gross total resection, and two had gross residual disease. While all patients were clinically node negative by pretreatment staging, three had positive nodal disease at surgery. Patients were hospitalized for a median 24 days (range 5-69) following surgery. Two patients developed empyema, one of whom developed respiratory failure and subsequently renal failure requiring dialysis, while the other required multiple surgical debridements. Two patients developed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response after surgery, one of whom developed acute respiratory distress requiring intubation and tracheostomy. At last follow-up, one patient died at 1.4 years after local and distant progression, two were alive with local and distant progression, and the remaining two were alive without evidence of disease at 0.1 and 2.7 years. Median time to progression was 9 months. Three patients received salvage chemotherapy. Conclusions: SMART provided promising oncologic outcomes at the cost of significant treatment related morbidity. Due to the significant treatment associated morbidity and favorable treatment alternatives, we have not broadly adopted SMART at our institution.

Association of tumor genomic factors and efficacy for metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To report tumor genomic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and local failure (LF) for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who received metastasis-directed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

This was a retrospective review of patients with CRC who received metastasis-directed SBRT. Tumor genomic alterations were identified through KRAS, BRAF, or a 50-gene next generation sequencing panel. OS and LF were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and competing-risk methods.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients and 109 lesions were treated between 2008 and 2018. The median patient follow-up was 50 months (IQR: 28-107). The median and 5-year OS was 34 months and 26% (95% CI: 16-41%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative incidence of LF was 30% (95% CI: 23-41%). Univariate associates with OS included patient age ≥60 years, bone metastasis, increasing tumor size, KRAS mutation, and combined KRAS and TP53 mutation, while increasing tumor size, bone metastasis, biologically effective dose <100 Gy, and combined KRAS and TP53 mutation were associated with LF. Multivariate associates with OS included patient age ≥60 years (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-4.8, p = 0.01), lesion size per 1 cm (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5, p < 0.01), and KRAS mutation (HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-4.3, p < 0.01), while no multivariable model for LF retained more than a single variable.

CONCLUSION

Genomic factors, in particular KRAS and TP53 mutation, may assist in patient selection and radiotherapeutic decision-making for patients with oligometastatic CRC. Prospective validation, ideally with genomic correlation of all irradiated metastases, is warranted.