1
|
Penoncello GP, Voss MM, Gao Y, Sensoy L, Cao M, Pepin MD, Herchko SM, Benedict SH, DeWees TA, Rong Y. Multicenter Multivendor Evaluation of Dose Volume Histogram Creation Consistencies for 8 Commercial Radiation Therapy Dosimetric Systems. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:e236-e248. [PMID: 37914082 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate dose volume histogram (DVH) construction differences across 8 major commercial treatment planning systems (TPS) and dose reporting systems for clinically treated plans of various anatomic sites and target sizes. METHODS AND MATERIALS Dose files from 10 selected clinically treated plans with a hypofractionation, stereotactic radiation therapy prescription or sharp dose gradients such as head and neck plans ranging from prescription doses of 18 Gy in 1 fraction to 70 Gy in 35 fractions, each calculated at 0.25 and 0.125 cm grid size, were created and anonymized in Eclipse TPS, and exported to 7 other major TPS (Pinnacle, RayStation, and Elements) and dose reporting systems (MIM, Mobius, ProKnow, and Velocity) systems for comparison. Dose-volume constraint points of clinical importance for each plan were collected from each evaluated system (D0.03 cc [Gy], volume, and the mean dose were used for structures without specified constraints). Each reported constraint type and structure volume was normalized to the value from Eclipse for a pairwise comparison. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for statistical significance and a multivariable regression model was evaluated adjusting for plan, grid size, and distance to target center. RESULTS For all DVH points relative to Eclipse, all systems reported median values within 1.0% difference of each other; however, they were all different from Eclipse. Considering mean values, Pinnacle, RayStation, and Elements averaged at 1.038, 1.046, and 1.024, respectively, while MIM, Mobius, ProKnow, and Velocity reported 1.026, 1.050, 1.033, and 1.022, respectively relative to Eclipse. Smaller dose grid size improved agreement between the systems marginally without statistical significance. For structure volumes relative to Eclipse, larger differences are seen across all systems with a range in median values up to 3.0% difference and mean up to 10.1% difference. CONCLUSIONS Large variations were observed between all systems. Eclipse generally reported, at statistically significant levels, lower values than all other evaluated systems. The nonsignificant change resulting from lowering the dose grid resolution indicates that this resolution may be less important than other aspects of calculating DVH curves, such as the 3-dimensional modeling of the structure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory P Penoncello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Molly M Voss
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Yu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Levent Sensoy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mark D Pepin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Steven M Herchko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Stanley H Benedict
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California; Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Laughlin BS, Corbin KS, Toesca DAS, Thorpe CS, Golafshar MA, Pockaj B, Cronin P, McGee LA, Halyard MY, Mutter RW, Keole SR, Park SS, Shumway DA, Vern-Gross TZ, Vallow L, Wong WW, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Physician- and Patient-Reported Outcomes of the MC1635 Phase 3 Trial of Ultrahypofractionated Versus Moderately Hypofractionated Adjuvant Radiation Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1049-1059. [PMID: 37914139 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our aim was to report physician- and patient-reported outcomes of patients with localized breast cancer treated with moderate versus ultrahypofractionated whole breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between February 2018 and February 2020, patients with localized breast cancer (pT0-3 pN0-1 M0) were offered participation in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessing adjuvant moderate hypofractionation (MHF) to 40 Gy in 15 fractions versus ultrahypofractionation (UHF) to 25 Gy in 5 fractions after BCS, with an optional simultaneously integrated boost. Toxicities, cosmesis, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and 3 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years from irradiation using validated metric tools. RESULTS One hundred seven patients were randomized to MHF (n = 54) or UHF (n = 53) adjuvant WBI. The median follow-up was 42.8 months. Grade 2 radiation dermatitis was experienced by 4 patients (7.4%) in the MHF arm and 2 patients (3.7%) in the UHF arm at EOT (P = .726). No grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed. Deterioration of cosmesis by physician assessment was observed in 2 (6.7%) patients treated in the UHF arm and 1 (1.9%) patient treated in the MHF arm at EOT (P = .534), whereas at 3 months, only 1 (1.8%) patient treated in the MHF arm demonstrated deterioration of cosmesis (P = .315). At EOT, 91% and 94% of patients reported excellent/good cosmesis among those treated with MHF and UHF regimens, respectively (P = .550). At 3 months, more patients within the MHF arm reported excellent/good cosmesis compared with those in the UHF arm (100% vs 91%; P = .030). However, the difference in patient-reported cosmesis disappeared at the 1-, 2-, and 3-year time points. CONCLUSIONS UHF WBI showed similar treatment-related late toxicities and similar provider-scored cosmesis compared with MHF radiation in patients treated adjuvantly after BCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Cameron S Thorpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sanford Health, Fargo, North Dakota
| | - Michael A Golafshar
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Barbara Pockaj
- Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Patricia Cronin
- Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sameer R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Dean A Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Laura Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zaniletti I, Gunn HJ, Hallemeier CL, Laughlin BS, Leavitt TR, Haddock MG, Merrell KW, Leenstra JL, May BC, Ashman JB, DeWees TA. Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Hepatobiliary Questionnaire to Evaluate the Change in the Quality of Life of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer During Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:137-141. [PMID: 37586614 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heather J Gunn
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James L Leenstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Northfield, Minnesota
| | - Byron C May
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Jonathan B Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Computational and Quantitative Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laughlin BS, Corbin KS, Thorpe CS, Toesca DAS, Golafshar MA, McGee LA, Halyard M, Mutter RW, Keole SR, Park SS, Shumway D, Vallow LA, Vern-Gross TZ, Wong WW, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Physician and Patient-Reported Outcomes of a Phase III Trial of Ultra-Hypofractionated vs. Moderate Hypofractionated Radiotherapy to the Whole Breast after Breast-Conserving Surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S6. [PMID: 37784534 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To report a final analysis evaluating physician and patient-reported outcomes of early breast cancer patients receiving moderate hypofractionation or ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS/METHODS Between April 4, 2018, and February 11, 2020, patients with localized breast cancer (T1-T3, N0-N1, and M0) managed with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive whole breast RT with moderate hypofractionation to 40 Gy in 15 fractions (Arm A) or ultra-hypofractionation to 25 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm B). An optional concurrent integrated boost to 48 Gy on Arm A or 30 Gy on Arm B was allowed. Early toxicity (<3 months), late toxicity (> 3 months), quality of life (QOL), cosmesis, Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and deterioration of cosmesis were analyzed. RESULTS One hundred and seven patients were randomized to moderate hypofractionation (n = 54) or ultra-hypofractionation (n = 53). With a median follow-up of 36 months, no significant differences in patient characteristics were noted between the two arms. There were no patients with a grade ≥3 or higher toxicity. Grade 2 toxicities were 7.4% in Arm A and 7.5% in Arm B, and primarily consisted of radiation dermatitis (6 patients), fibrosis (1 patient) and lymphedema (1 patient). The average Harvard Cosmesis score and overall QoL were similar between arms at all time points, with no patients developing cosmetic deterioration. Patient-reported moderate to severe radiation skin burns were more commonly reported in Arm A (21.05%) vs. Arm B (6.25%) at the end of treatment (EOT) (p = 0.078). At EOT, patients receiving moderate hypofractionation had higher mean toxicity scores in breast tenderness (2.66 vs. 1.5, p = 0.018), skin flaking or peeling (0.63 vs. 0.06, p = 0.035), blistering (0.74 vs. 0.06, p = 0.028), pruritis (2.53 vs. 0.87, p < 0.001), erythema (4.24 vs. 2.0, p <0.001), telangiectasias (1.0 vs. 0.28, p = 0.021). Additionally, patients receiving moderate hypofractionation reported significantly worse changes from baseline at EOT in breast tenderness (-2.25 vs. -.86, p = 0.02), telangiectasia (-0.81 vs. 0.18, p = 0.012), skin discoloration (-4.31 vs. -1.04, p < 0.001), skin flaking or peeling (-.55 vs. 0.04, p = 0.053), blistering (-0.82 vs. -0.07, p = 0.033), and pruritus (-2.27 vs. -.67, p = 0.002). There was a return to baseline in all patient-reported breast domains by 3 months (p >0.05) in both arms. CONCLUSION Ultra-hypofractionated whole breast irradiation, consisting of 25 Gy in 5 fractions, provided comparable provider assessed toxicity and cosmetic outcomes to 40 Gy in 15 fractions. At the EOT assessment, ultra-hypofractionation had a better patient reported toxicity profile. Our findings provide further evidence to support daily ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy as an appropriate treatment option for early-stage breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - K S Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - C S Thorpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sanford Health, Fargo, ND
| | - D A S Toesca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M A Golafshar
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M Halyard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - R W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - S R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - S S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - L A Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - T Z Vern-Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - W W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sperduto W, Voss MM, Laughlin B, Toesca DAS, Wong WW, Keole SR, Rwigema JC, Yu NY, Schild SE, James SE, Daniels TB, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Oncologic Outcomes of Conventionally Fractionated, Hypofractionated, and Stereotactic Body Spot-Scanned Proton Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e440. [PMID: 37785429 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Spot/pencil beam scanned proton therapy is a relatively new technology with fundamental differences from double scattered or IMRT. We aimed to report the long-term oncologic outcomes of a contemporary prospective series of patients treated with spot-scanned proton therapy (SSPT). MATERIALS/METHODS An IRB-approved prospective registry identified patients with prostate cancer treated with proton therapy between January 2016 and December 2018. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all patients. Clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were gathered and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate survival and recurrence rates. Outcomes assessed included 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year local control (LC), biochemical failure (BF), regional and distant failures, and physician-reported adverse events (AEs). Biochemical failure was defined as rise in PSA ≥ 2.0 ng/mL above nadir PSA. Acute and chronic gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) grade 2+ and grade 3+ baseline-adjusted AEs were assigned using CTCAE v5.0. All failures were re-staged with PET C-11 or PSMA. RESULTS With a median follow up of 4.4 years (IQR 3.7 - 5), two hundred and eighty-six prostate cancer patients with a median age of 72 (IQR 67.5 - 77) were treated with spot-scanned proton radiation. The median Gleason grade group was 3 (IQR 2 - 4). The median pre-RT PSA was 6.9 ng/mL (IQR 4.3 - 10.5). Median T-stage was T1c. Nearly 64% of all patients were on androgen deprivation therapy at the time of initiating radiation treatment. The median total radiation dose was 79.2 Gy delivered over 44 fractions, 70 Gy over 28 fractions, and 38 Gy over 5 fractions for CF, HF, and SBRT regimens, respectively. The BF rate for all patients was 8.4%. The 5-year LC rates for CF, HF, and SBRT were 100% (95% CI: 100 - 100), 100% (95% CI: 100 - 100), and 97.3% (95% CI: 92.2 - 100), respectively (p = 0.07). Regional recurrences occurred in 12 (4.2%) patients: 8 (5.6%) treated with CF, 2 (2.1%) with HF, and 2 (4.3%) with SBRT (p = 0.62). Distant metastatic failures occurred in 12 patients (4.2%): 5 (3.5%) treated with CF, 7 (7.4%) with HF, and none with SBRT (0%) (p = 0.052). The 5-year OS for patients treated with CF, HF, and SBRT SSPT were 88.2% (95% CI: 81.8 - 95), 86.2% (95% CI: 77.6 - 95.6), and 97.2% (95% CI: 92 - 100), respectively (p = 0.1). Acute and chronic grade 2+ GI baseline-adjusted AEs occurred in 8 (2.8%) and 51 (17.8%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ GI baseline-adjusted AEs occurred in 3 (1%) and 4 (1.4%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 2+ GU-related AEs were observed in 72 (25.2%) and 63 (22%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ GU toxicity was observed in 3 (1%) and 6 (2.1%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Spot-scanned proton radiation therapy provides high local control rates and excellent oncologic outcomes across different fractionation schedules with low long-term AE rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Sperduto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M M Voss
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - B Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - D A S Toesca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - W W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - S R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - J C Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - N Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - S E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Toesca DAS, Hartsell WF, DeWees TA, Chang J, Laughlin B, Voss MM, Mohammed N, Keole SR, McGee LA, Gondi V, Sweeney PJ, Dorn PL, Sinesi CC, Jr LSD, Rich TA, Vargas CE. Final Analysis of a Phase III Controlled Randomized Study of Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy or Conventionally Fractionated Proton Therapy for Early Prostate Cancer: PCG GU002. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:S24-S25. [PMID: 37784460 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To determine if stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) is non-inferior to conventionally fractionated proton therapy (CFPT) in patients with early prostate cancer. MATERIALS/METHODS Multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority phase 3 trial that included patients with histologically confirmed low-risk prostate adenocarcinoma defined by Gleason score ≤6, PSA <10 ng/mL, and clinical stage T1-2a N0 M0 by AJCC 7th Ed. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (initially 1:1 and later 2:1 ratio) to CFPT (79.2 Gy in 44 fractions for 9 weeks) or SBPT (38 Gy in 5 fractions for 1 week). Concurrent or adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was not allowed. The primary endpoint was freedom from failure (FFF) at 2 years, defined as the first occurrence of local, regional, or distant recurrence, biochemical failure by the Phoenix definition (increase of PSA ≥2 ng/mL over the nadir PSA), or the start of salvage therapy including ADT. Secondary endpoints included GI and GU grade ≥2 toxicity according to CTCAE v4 criteria, as well as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) metrics assessed by AUASI and EPIC scores. Non-inferiority would be declared if the 1-sided 95% confidence interval limit for the difference in 2-year FFF rate was below 4.2% between both groups by Clopper-Pearson exact method. RESULTS Between November 2010 and September 2020, 133 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to CFPT (n = 45) or SBPT (n = 88). Median follow-up was 5 years (IQ 3.9-5.2), with the last patient enrolled followed for at least 2 years. The 2-year FFF was 100% for both groups, fulfilling the pre-specified criteria for non-inferiority of SBPT compared to CFPT. By KM estimates, 5-year FFF was 97.4% and 100% (P = 0.1), and the 5-year OS was 97.1% and 95.5% (P = 0.46) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. The cumulative incidence of any grade ≥3 toxicities at 5 years was 0% and 5.7% (P = 0.14) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. The frequency of GI grade ≥2 toxicity at 6 months was of 0% and 2.3% (P = 0.55), and at 2 years was of 6.7% and 3.4% (P = 0.69) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. The frequency of GU grade ≥2 toxicity at 6 months was of 2.2% and 5.7% (P = 0.42), and at 2 years was of 8.9% and 5.7% (P = 0.54) for patients treated with CFPT and SBPT, respectively. Changes in HRQoL scores at 2 years were similar between groups (Table). CONCLUSION SBPT is non-inferior to CFPT regarding FFF and associated with similar long-term toxicity rates and HRQoL metric scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D A S Toesca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - J Chang
- The Oklahoma Proton Center and University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - B Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M M Voss
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - N Mohammed
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | - S R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - V Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | - P J Sweeney
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, IL
| | - P L Dorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO
| | - C C Sinesi
- Hampton University Proton Therapy Institute, Hampton, VA
| | - L S Doh Jr
- Radiation Medicine Associates, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - T A Rich
- University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zaniletti I, Laughlin B, Gunn HJ, Haddock MG, Ashman JB, Wittich MN, Jethwa KR, Sio TTW, DeWees TA. Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the FACT-E to Evaluate the Change in the Quality of Life of Patients with Esophageal Cancer Treated with Curative Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e275-e276. [PMID: 37785036 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Patients with esophageal cancer (EC) are often treated with radiotherapy (RT). The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Esophageal (FACT-E) is a health-related quality of life (QOL) instrument validated in patients with EC. The aim of this study was to determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for FACT-E subscales, to allow for meaningful evaluation of the effect of RT on EC patient's QOL. MATERIALS/METHODS We evaluated patients with EC, treated with curative intent RT, who completed the FACT-E at baseline and end of treatment (EOT). We calculated the MCID for the FACT-E subscales using anchor-based and distribution-based approaches. In the anchor-based approach we determined improvement and deterioration based on the overall health assessment from the PROMIS-10 as the anchor. We modeled the change in domain scores with age-adjusted regressions to determine the difference in classifications. For distribution-based analysis, we considered 0.3 and 0.5 standard deviation (SD). We averaged MCID for improvement and deterioration separately across timepoints, by approach, and we report MCID ranges as the minimum and maximum values across methods. RESULTS Our cohort included 210 patients with EC, 96.7% white, 85.7% males, and 32.9% treated with photon with a median dose of 50 Gy (IQR 50-50) and a median fraction number of 25(IQR 25,25). The median age at RT was 67.6 years (IQR 60.9,73.7). The social domain had the lowest MCID (deterioration and improvement 0.9-1.9), while the widest MCID range, proportionally to the measure, was associated with the Fact-E total score (2.1-5.6 for improvement, and 3.7-5.6 for deterioration). MCID estimates from 0.3 SD were in exact agreement with the anchor-based deterioration estimates for the physical domain (2.3), and improvement estimates for the Trial Outcome Index (6.1). CONCLUSION We determined the MCID for the FACT-E domains, using a combination of anchor- and distribution-based approaches. These findings are critical to determine whether there is meaningful change in the QOL of individuals with EC treated with curative RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Zaniletti
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - B Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | - M G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - J B Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - M Neben Wittich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - T T W Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gunn HJ, DeWees TA, Voss MM, Corbin KS, Hallemeier CL, Stish BJ, Haddock MG, Petersen IA, Rule WG, Vallow LA, Brown PD, Olivier K, Trifiletti DM, Vargas CE, Ma DJ. Sensitivity of the PROMIS-10 for Capturing Radiation-Related Quality of Life Changes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e232-e233. [PMID: 37784929 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Patient reported outcomes (PROs) are becoming more common when assessing the effects of radiotherapy (RT). The aim of this study was to assess the sensitivity of the Mental and Physical domains of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 10 (PROMIS-10) to radiotherapy and determine what predictors were associated with change in quality of life. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients, regardless of cancer type, were enrolled on a multi-site prospective registry. Inclusion criteria included curative radiotherapy and completion of the PROMIS-10 prior to treatment (Baseline) and at End of Treatment (EOT). To assess the strongest predictors of change in the T score of mental and physical health, we included 14 demographic characteristics and treatment variables in a multivariable stepwise regression. RESULTS A total of 7,586 patients were eligible for the analysis. The median age was 65 (range 18-94), 54% were males, and 94% were white. A majority received photons (62.5%) and the others received protons (37.5%) with an average dose of 52.3 Gy (range 20-80 Gy) over an average of 22.6 fractions (range 1-66). Patient disease sites were sub-grouped into 12 categories: Breast (25.5%), GU (23.0%), H&N (11.1%), CNS (8.5%), Pancreas-Biliary (6.7%), Thoracic (5.7%), Soft Tissue/Bone (5.0%), Esophagus-Gastric (4.7%), Colorectal-Anus (4.4%), Heme/Lymph (2.6%), GYN (1.8%), and Skin/Melanoma (1.0%). For both outcomes, the model selected disease group as an important predictor and it explained the most variance in the outcome compared to the rest of the predictors. When probing the effect of disease group, H&N, Esophagus-Gastric, Skin/Melanoma, and Colorectal-Anus had the largest mean decrease in quality of life for both domains. For mental health, the model also selected radiation type. Patients treated with protons indicated a bigger decrease in mental health compared to patients treated with photons (b = 0.43, 95% CI: -0.01, 0.69). For physical health, the model selected total fractions, ethnicity, and T stage. As number of fractions increased, the physical health change scores became more negative, on average (b = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.05, -0.01). Hispanic/Latino patients indicated a smaller decrease in physical health compared to White (b = -1.50, 95% CI: -2.60, -0.40) and Unknown ethnicity patients (b = -1.82, 95% CI: -3.36, -0.27). Finally, patients with a T stage of 3 or greater indicated a smaller decrease in physical health than patients with a T stage less than 3 (b = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.16). CONCLUSION The PROMIS-10 did not capture significant change for patients undergoing curative radiotherapy except for patients with Head & Neck, Esophagus-Gastric, Skin, and Colorectal-Anus cancer. Further analyses should explore which patients experience the greatest change in quality of life within disease group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - M M Voss
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - K S Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - B J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - M G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - I A Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - W G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - L A Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - P D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - K Olivier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - D M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - D J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gergelis KR, Bogan AW, DeWees TA, Haddock MG, Glaser GE, Kumar A, Petersen IA, Garda AE. Assessing the Sexual Health of Female Survivors of Pelvic Malignancies after Radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:e231. [PMID: 37784927 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.1146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) To assess patient-reported sexual health outcomes of female survivors of pelvic malignancies after radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS/METHODS Female patients treated with curative intent RT for pelvic malignancies between 2013 and 2019 were surveyed electronically post-RT using the PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction Full Profile and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised questionnaires. Cervical and vaginal cancers were grouped together due to the similar treatment characteristics. RESULTS Surveys were sent to 544 patients, and 53 (10%) completed the questionnaires. Respondents included survivors of anal canal (N = 11), cervical or vaginal (N = 10), uterine (N = 30), and vulvar cancers (N = 2). The median age of patients at the time of treatment was 60 years (range 31,77). The median time between RT and survey completion was 6 years (range 3,9). A total of 22 (42%), 17 (32%), and 14 patients (26%) were treated with brachytherapy (BT), external beam RT (EBRT), or a combination of EBRT and BT, respectively. Of respondents, 96% were free of disease recurrence. Sexually active was defined as partaking in sexual activity within 30 days of survey response. Patients were stratified by age greater than or less than 52 at time of RT, representing the average age of menopause. A total of 30 patients (57%) had at least somewhat interest in sex. There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had at least somewhat interest in sex over 52 years compared to those 52 and (54% vs 67%, p = 0.424). A total of 39 patients (74%) were sexually active, and of those 30 (77%) were over the age of 52 at the time of RT. Of sexually active patients, 28 (72%) reported some, quite a bit, or a lot of satisfaction with their sex lives, whereas the remaining 11 (28%) reported having none or a little bit of satisfaction with their sex lives; the proportion of those with at least some satisfaction with their sex lives did not differ between those who were over or under 52 years at the time of RT (73% vs 67%, p = 0.697). Satisfaction with sex life differed by site of malignancy with 71% cervical or vaginal, 44% anal canal, 86% uterine, and 0% vulvar patients reporting at least some satisfaction (p = 0.043). Patients treated for anal canal cancer tended to have quite a bit or a lot of vaginal discomfort during sex (78%), compared to those treated for cervical/vaginal (29%), or endometrial (18%) cancers (p = 0.006). There was no difference in patients feeling frequently or always stressed about sex between those who were sexually active compared to those who were not (13% vs 14%, p = 0.890). Patients 52 or under at the time of RT were more likely to feel frequently or always stressed about sex compared to those receiving RT over the age of 52 (42% vs 5%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION In our cohort, the majority of female survivors of pelvic malignancies were sexually active post-RT, and this important topic warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K R Gergelis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY
| | - A W Bogan
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - T A DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - M G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - G E Glaser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Rochester, MN
| | - A Kumar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Rochester, MN
| | - I A Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - A E Garda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laughlin BS, Golafshar M, Prince M, Liu W, Kutyreff CJ, Ahmed SK, Vern Gross TZ, Haddock M, Petersen I, DeWees TA, Ashman JB. Dosimetric comparison between proton beam therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy, and 3D conformal therapy for soft tissue extremity sarcoma. Acta Oncol 2023:1-7. [PMID: 37154167 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2209267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES Proton beam therapy (PBT) may provide a dosimetric advantage in sparing soft tissue and bone for selected patients with extremity soft sarcoma (eSTS). We compared PBT with photons plans generated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). MATERIALS/METHODS Seventeen patients previously treated with pencil beam scanning PBT were included in this study. Of these patients, 14 treated with pre-operative 50 Gy in 25 fractions were analyzed. IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were created to compare against the original PBT plans. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) indices were evaluated amongst PBT, IMRT, and 3D plans. Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests were used to get the statistical significance. A p value smaller than .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS For the clinical target volume (CTV), D2%, D95%, D98%, Dmin, Dmax, and V50Gy, were assessed. Dmin, D1%, Dmax, Dmean, V1Gy, V5Gy, and V50Gy were evaluated for the adjacent soft tissue. D1%, Dmax, Dmean, and V35-50% were evaluated for bone. All plans met CTV target coverage. The PBT plans delivered less dose to soft tissue and bone. The mean dose to the soft tissue was 2 Gy, 11 Gy, and 13 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p < .001). The mean dose to adjacent bone was 15 Gy, 26 Gy, and 28 Gy for PBT, IMRT, and 3D, respectively (p = .022). CONCLUSION PBT plans for selected patients with eSTS demonstrated improved sparing of circumferential soft tissue and adjacent bone compared to IMRT and 3D-CRT. Further evaluation will determine if this improved dosimetry correlates with reduced toxicity and improved quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Golafshar
- Department of Quanitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Matthew Prince
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Safia K Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Michael Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Quanitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lucido JJ, DeWees TA, Leavitt TR, Anand A, Beltran CJ, Brooke MD, Buroker JR, Foote RL, Foss OR, Gleason AM, Hodge TL, Hughes CO, Hunzeker AE, Laack NN, Lenz TK, Livne M, Morigami M, Moseley DJ, Undahl LM, Patel Y, Tryggestad EJ, Walker MZ, Zverovitch A, Patel SH. Validation of clinical acceptability of deep-learning-based automated segmentation of organs-at-risk for head-and-neck radiotherapy treatment planning. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1137803. [PMID: 37091160 PMCID: PMC10115982 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1137803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionOrgan-at-risk segmentation for head and neck cancer radiation therapy is a complex and time-consuming process (requiring up to 42 individual structure, and may delay start of treatment or even limit access to function-preserving care. Feasibility of using a deep learning (DL) based autosegmentation model to reduce contouring time without compromising contour accuracy is assessed through a blinded randomized trial of radiation oncologists (ROs) using retrospective, de-identified patient data.MethodsTwo head and neck expert ROs used dedicated time to create gold standard (GS) contours on computed tomography (CT) images. 445 CTs were used to train a custom 3D U-Net DL model covering 42 organs-at-risk, with an additional 20 CTs were held out for the randomized trial. For each held-out patient dataset, one of the eight participant ROs was randomly allocated to review and revise the contours produced by the DL model, while another reviewed contours produced by a medical dosimetry assistant (MDA), both blinded to their origin. Time required for MDAs and ROs to contour was recorded, and the unrevised DL contours, as well as the RO-revised contours by the MDAs and DL model were compared to the GS for that patient.ResultsMean time for initial MDA contouring was 2.3 hours (range 1.6-3.8 hours) and RO-revision took 1.1 hours (range, 0.4-4.4 hours), compared to 0.7 hours (range 0.1-2.0 hours) for the RO-revisions to DL contours. Total time reduced by 76% (95%-Confidence Interval: 65%-88%) and RO-revision time reduced by 35% (95%-CI,-39%-91%). All geometric and dosimetric metrics computed, agreement with GS was equivalent or significantly greater (p<0.05) for RO-revised DL contours compared to the RO-revised MDA contours, including volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (VDSC), surface DSC, added path length, and the 95%-Hausdorff distance. 32 OARs (76%) had mean VDSC greater than 0.8 for the RO-revised DL contours, compared to 20 (48%) for RO-revised MDA contours, and 34 (81%) for the unrevised DL OARs.ConclusionDL autosegmentation demonstrated significant time-savings for organ-at-risk contouring while improving agreement with the institutional GS, indicating comparable accuracy of DL model. Integration into the clinical practice with a prospective evaluation is currently underway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. John Lucido
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
- *Correspondence: J. John Lucido,
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Todd R. Leavitt
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Aman Anand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Chris J. Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | | | - Justine R. Buroker
- Research Services, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Olivia R. Foss
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Angela M. Gleason
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Teresa L. Hodge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | - Ashley E. Hunzeker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Nadia N. Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Tamra K. Lenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Douglas J. Moseley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Lisa M. Undahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | - Yojan Patel
- Google Health, Mountain View, CA, United States
| | - Erik J. Tryggestad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States
| | | | | | - Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoppe BS, Petersen IA, Wilke BK, DeWees TA, Imai R, Hug EB, Fiore MR, Debus J, Fossati P, Yamada S, Orlandi E, Zhang Q, Bao C, Seidensaal K, May BC, Harrell AC, Houdek MT, Vallow LA, Rose PS, Haddock MG, Ashman JB, Goulding KA, Attia S, Krishnan S, Mahajan A, Foote RL, Laack NN, Keole SR, Beltran CJ, Welch EM, Karim M, Ahmed SK. Pragmatic, Prospective Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Carbon Ion Therapy, Surgery, and Proton Therapy for the Management of Pelvic Sarcomas (Soft Tissue/Bone) Involving the Bone: The PROSPER Study Rationale and Design. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1660. [PMID: 36980545 PMCID: PMC10046156 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical treatment of pelvic sarcoma involving the bone is the standard of care but is associated with several sequelae and reduced functional quality of life (QOL). Treatment with photon and proton radiotherapy is associated with relapse. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) may reduce both relapse rates and treatment sequelae. The PROSPER study is a tricontinental, nonrandomized, prospective, three-arm, pragmatic trial evaluating treatments of pelvic sarcoma involving the bone. Patients aged at least 15 years are eligible for inclusion. Participants must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of two or less, newly diagnosed disease, and histopathologic confirmation of pelvic chordoma, chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma with bone involvement, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) with bone involvement, or non-RMS soft tissue sarcoma with bone involvement. Treatment arms include (1) CIRT (n = 30) delivered in Europe and Asia, (2) surgical treatment with or without adjuvant radiotherapy (n = 30), and (3) proton therapy (n = 30). Arms two and three will be conducted at Mayo Clinic campuses in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. The primary end point is to compare the 1-year change in functional QOL between CIRT and surgical treatment. Additional comparisons among the three arms will be made between treatment sequelae, local control, and other QOL measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradford S. Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Ivy A. Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Benjamin K. Wilke
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Reiko Imai
- Division of Radiation Oncology, QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Eugen B. Hug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Maria Rosaria Fiore
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Piero Fossati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Department for Basic and Translational Oncology and Hematology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 3500 Krems, Austria
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- Division of Radiation Oncology, QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201102, China
| | - Cihang Bao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201102, China
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation, German Cancer Research Center, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Byron C. May
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Anna C. Harrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Matthew T. Houdek
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Laura A. Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Peter S. Rose
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | - Steven Attia
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Houston Neurosciences-Texas Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Robert L. Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Nadia N. Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Chris J. Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Eric M. Welch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Mohammed Karim
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Laughlin BS, Ebrahimi S, Voss MM, Patel SH, Foote RL, McGee LA, Garcia J, Ma DJ, Garces YI, Wittich MAN, Price KA, Schmitt A, Zhai Q, May BC, Nagel TH, Hinni ML, Chintakuntlawar AV, DeWees TA, Rwigema JCM. Clinicopathologic factors and their association with outcomes of salivary ductal carcinoma: a multi-center experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101204. [PMID: 37152485 PMCID: PMC10157113 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This series reports long-term clinical outcomes of patients with salivary duct carcinoma (SDC), which is associated with a poor prognosis. Methods and Materials Eighty-nine patients with SDC were treated with curative intent from February 5, 1971, through September 15, 2018. Kaplan-Meier and competing risk analyses were used to estimate locoregional control, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses of disease and treatment characteristics were performed to discover predictors of locoregional control, DMFS, and OS. Results Median follow-up was 44.1 months (range, 0.23-356.67). The median age at diagnosis was 66 years (interquartile range, 57-75). Curative surgery followed by adjuvant radiation therapy was performed in 73 patients (82%). Chemotherapy was delivered in 26 patients (29.2%). The 5-year local recurrence and distant metastasis rates were 27% and 44%, respectively, with death as a competing risk. Distant metastasis was associated with lymph node-positive disease (hazard ratio [HR], 3.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38-7.23; P = .006), stage IV disease (HR, 4.78; 95% CI, 1.14-20.11; P = .033), perineural invasion (HR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.74-11.97; P = .002), and positive margins (HR, 9.06; 95% CI, 3.88-21.14; P < .001). Median OS was 4.84 years (95% CI, 3.54-7.02). The 5-year OS was 42%. Reduced OS was associated with lymphovascular space invasion (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.2-10.1; P = .022), perineural invasion (HR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.06-3.97; P = .033), positive margins (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3-5.6; P = .011), N2 disease (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.03-3.43; P = .04), and N3 disease (HR, 11.76; 95% CI, 3.19-43.3; P < .001). Conclusions In this single-institution, multicenter retrospective study, the 5-year survival was 42% in patients with SDC. Lymphovascular space invasion, lymph node involvement, and higher staging at diagnosis were associated with lower DMFS and OS.
Collapse
|
14
|
Yu NY, Patel SH, Schild SE, DeWees TA. Rational radiotherapy: The role in node-negative squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2023; 88:e141-e142. [PMID: 31589942 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.09.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Thorpe CS, DeWees TA, Laughlin BS, Vallow LA, Seneviratne D, Pockaj BA, Cronin PA, Halyard MY, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, McLaughlin SA, Voss MM, Golafshar MA, Bulman GF, Vargas CE. Pilot/Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy to the Whole Breast Alone Before Breast Conserving Surgery. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101111. [PMID: 36483068 PMCID: PMC9723298 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to report the results of a phase II trial of patients with breast cancer treated with hypofractionated whole breast radiation therapy (RT) before breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Methods and materials Between 2019 and 2020, patients with cT0-T2, N0, M0 breast cancer were enrolled. Patients were treated with hypofractionated whole breast RT, 25 Gy in 5 fractions, 4 to 8 weeks before BCS. Pathologic assessment was performed using the residual cancer burden (RCB). Toxicities were assessed according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4). Quality of life was assessed with Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale, Linear Analogue Self-Assessment, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Results Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 7.6 months (range, 0.2-16.8). Seven (32%) and 2 (9%) patients experienced grade 2+ or 3 toxicities, respectively. Overall quality of life Linear Analogue Self-Assessment and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System did not change significantly from baseline (P = .21 and P = .72, respectively). There was no clinically significant change (≥1 point) in any of The Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale domains. Only 1 (5%) patient experienced a clinical deterioration that corresponded to a "fair" outcome on the Harvard Cosmesis Scale. At pathologic evaluation, 14 (64%) patients had RCB-0 or RCB-I, including 3 (14%) patients with a pathologic complete response (RCB-0). Eight patients (36%) had RCB-II. No local or distant recurrences have been observed. Conclusions Extremely hypofractionated whole breast RT before BCS is a feasible approach. There were low rates of toxicities and good cosmesis. Further investigation into this approach with RT before BCS is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Laura A. Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Dee Seneviratne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | | | | | | | | | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim H, Olsen JR, Green OL, Chin RI, Hawkins WG, Fields RC, Hammill C, Doyle MB, Chapman W, Suresh R, Tan B, Pedersen K, Jansen B, DeWees TA, Lu E, Henke LE, Badiyan S, Parikh PJ, Roach MC, Wang-Gillam A, Lim KH. MR-Guided Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel Chemotherapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer: A TITE-CRM Phase I Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:214-223. [PMID: 35878713 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ablative radiation therapy for borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA-PDAC) may limit concurrent chemotherapy dosing and usually is only safely deliverable to tumors distant from gastrointestinal organs. Magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy may safely permit radiation and chemotherapy dose escalation. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a single-arm phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ablative hypofractionated radiation with full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with BR/LA-PDAC. Patients were treated with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/125 mg/m2) x 1c then concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation. Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel and radiation doses were escalated per time-to-event continual reassessment method from 40 to 45 Gy 25 fxs with chemotherapy (600-800/75 mg/m2) to 60 to 67.5 Gy/15 fractions and concurrent gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose of radiation as defined by 60-day dose limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was treatment-related G5, G4 hematologic, or G3 gastrointestinal requiring hospitalization >3 days. Secondary endpoints included resection rates, local progression free survival (LPFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Thirty patients enrolled (March 2015-February 2019), with 26 evaluable patients (2 progressed before radiation, 1 was determined ineligible for radiation during planning, 1 withdrew consent). One DLT was observed. The DLT rate was 14.1% (3.3%-24.9%) with a maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (1000/100 mg/m2) and 67.5 Gy/15 fractions. At a median follow-up of 40.6 months for living patients the median OS was 14.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-28.2 months). The median OS for patients with Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group 0 and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <90 were 34.1 (95% CI, 13.6-54.1) and 43.0 (95% CI, 8.0-not reached) months, respectively. Two-year LPFS and DMFS were 85% (95% CI, 63%-94%) and 57% (95% CI, 34%-73%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Full-dose gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel with ablative magnetic resonance guided radiation therapy dosing is safe in patients with BR/LA-PDAC, with promising LPFS and DMFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Kim
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri.
| | - Jeffrey R Olsen
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, Denver, Colorado
| | - Olga L Green
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Re-I Chin
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William G Hawkins
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ryan C Fields
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Chet Hammill
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Majella B Doyle
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - William Chapman
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Section of Pancreatic, Hepatobiliary and Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rama Suresh
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Benjamin Tan
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Katrina Pedersen
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brandi Jansen
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Esther Lu
- Washington University School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Lauren E Henke
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Shahed Badiyan
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J Parikh
- Henry Ford Health System, Department of Radiation Oncology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Michael C Roach
- Hawai'i Pacific Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | - Andrea Wang-Gillam
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kian-Huat Lim
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Section of Medical Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Laughlin BS, Lo S, Vargas CE, DeWees TA, Van der Walt C, Tinnon K, Beckett M, Hobbis D, Schild SE, Wong WW, Keole SR, Rwigema JCM, Yu NY, Clouser E, Rong Y. Clinical Practice Evolvement for Post-Operative Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy-Part 1: Consistent Organs at Risk Management with Advanced Image Guidance. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010016. [PMID: 36612013 PMCID: PMC9817677 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Post-operative prostate cancer patients are treated with full bladder instruction and the use of an endorectal balloon (ERB). We reassessed the efficacy of this practice based on daily image guidance and dose delivery using high-quality iterative reconstructed cone-beam CT (iCBCT). Methods: Fractional dose delivery was calculated on daily iCBCT for 314 fractions from 14 post-operative prostate patients (8 with and 6 without ERB) treated with volumetric modulated radiotherapy (VMAT). All patients were positioned using novel iCBCT during image guidance. The bladder, rectal wall, femoral heads, and prostate bed clinical tumor volume (CTV) were contoured and verified on daily iCBCT. The dose-volume parameters of the contoured organs at risk (OAR) and CTV coverage were assessed for the clinical impact of daily bladder volume variations and the use of ERB. Minimum bladder volume was studied, and a straightforward bladder instruction was explored for easy clinical adoption. Results: A “minimum bladder” contour, the overlap between the original bladder contour and a 15 mm anterior and superior expansion from prostate bed PTV, was confirmed to be effective in identifying cases that might fail a bladder constraint of V65% <60%. The average difference between the maximum and minimum bladder volumes for each patient was 277.1 mL. The daily bladder volumes varied from 62.4 to 590.7 mL and ranged from 29 to 286% of the corresponding planning bladder volume. The bladder constraint of V65% <60% was met in almost all fractions (98%). CTVs (D90%, D95%, and D98%) remained well-covered regardless of the absolute bladder volume daily variation or the presence of the endorectal balloon. Patients with an endorectal balloon showed smaller variation but a higher average maximum rectal wall dose (D0.03mL: 104.3% of the prescription) compared to patients without (103.3%). Conclusions: A “minimum bladder” contour was determined that can be easily generated and followed to ensure sufficient bladder sparing. Further analysis and validation are needed to confirm the utility of the minimal bladder contour. Accurate dose delivery can be achieved for prostate bed target coverage and OAR sparing with or without the use of ERB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S. Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Stephanie Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Charles Van der Walt
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 13400 E Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | - Katie Tinnon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Mason Beckett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Dean Hobbis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Steven E. Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Jean-Claude M. Rwigema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Edward Clouser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Laughlin BS, Voss MM, Toesca DA, Daniels T, Golafshar MA, Keole SR, Wong WW, Rwigema JC, Davis B, Schild SE, Stish BJ, Choo R, Lester S, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Preliminary Analysis of a Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer With High-Risk Features After Radical Prostatectomy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101143. [PMID: 36845611 PMCID: PMC9943785 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There are limited data regarding using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the postprostatectomy setting. Here, we present a preliminary analysis of a prospective phase II trial that aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of postprostatectomy SBRT for adjuvant or early salvage therapy. Materials and Methods Between May 2018 and May 2020, 41 patients fulfilled inclusion criteria and were stratified into 3 groups: group I (adjuvant), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) < 0.2 ng/mL with high-risk features including positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle invasion, or extracapsular extension; group II (salvage), with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL but < 2 ng/mL; or group III (oligometastatic), with PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL but < 2 ng/mL and up to 3 sites of nodal or bone metastases. Androgen deprivation therapy was not offered to group I. Androgen deprivation therapy was offered for 6 months for group II and 18 months for group III patients. SBRT dose to the prostate bed was 30 to 32 Gy in 5 fractions. Baseline-adjusted physician reported toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events), patient reported quality-of-life (Expanded Prostate Index Composite, Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System), and American Urologic Association scores were evaluated for all patients. Results The median follow-up was 23 months (range, 10-37). SBRT was adjuvant in 8 (20%) patients, salvage in 28 (68%), and salvage with the presence of oligometastases in 5 (12%) patients. Urinary, bowel, and sexual quality of life domains remained high after SBRT. Patients tolerated SBRT with no grade 3 or higher (3+) gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicities. The baseline adjusted acute and late toxicity grade 2 genitourinary (urinary incontinence) rate was 2.4% (1/41) and 12.2% (5/41). At 2 years, clinical disease control was 95%, and biochemical control was 73%. Among the 2 clinical failures, 1 was a regional node and the other a bone metastasis. Oligometastatic sites were salvaged successfully with SBRT. There were no in-target failures. Conclusions Postprostatectomy SBRT was very well tolerated in this prospective cohort, with no significant effect on quality of life metrics postirradiation, while providing excellent clinical disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Thomas Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona,Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, Brooklyn, New York
| | | | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Brian Davis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Brad J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona,Corresponding author: Carlos E. Vargas, MD
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Yu NY, DeWees TA, Voss MM, Breen WG, Chiang JS, Ding JX, Daniels TB, Owen D, Olivier KR, Garces YI, Park SS, Sarkaria JN, Yang P, Savvides PS, Ernani V, Liu W, Schild SE, Merrell KW, Sio TT. Cardiopulmonary Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2022; 23:e526-e535. [PMID: 36104272 DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) has the potential to reduce radiation dose to normal organs when compared to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). We hypothesized that IMPT is associated with a reduced rate of cardiopulmonary toxicities in patients with Stage III NSCLC when compared with IMRT. METHODS We analyzed 163 consecutively treated patients with biopsy-proven, stage III NSCLC who received IMPT (n = 35, 21%) or IMRT (n = 128, 79%). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were analyzed. Overall survival (OS), freedom-from distant metastasis (FFDM), freedom-from locoregional relapse (FFLR), and cardiopulmonary toxicities (CTCAE v5.0) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Univariate cox regressions were conducted for the final model. RESULTS Median follow-up of surviving patients was 25.5 (range, 4.6-58.1) months. Median RT dose was 60 (range, 45-72) Gy [RBE]. OS, FFDM, and FFLR were not different based on RT modality. IMPT provided significant dosimetric pulmonary and cardiac sparing when compared to IMRT. IMPT was associated with a reduced rate of grade more than or equal to 3 pneumonitis (HR 0.25, P = .04) and grade more than or equal to 3 cardiac events (HR 0.33, P = .08). Pre-treatment predicted diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide less than equal to 57% (HR 2.8, P = .04) and forced expiratory volume in the first second less than equal to 61% (HR 3.1, P = .03) were associated with an increased rate of grade more than or equal to 3 pneumonitis. CONCLUSIONS IMPT is associated with a reduced risk of clinically significant pneumonitis and cardiac events when compared with IMRT without compromising tumor control in stage III NSCLC. IMPT may provide a safer treatment option, particularly for high-risk patients with poor pretreatment pulmonary function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - Molly M Voss
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - William G Breen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Julia X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Thomas B Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jann N Sarkaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Ping Yang
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | | | - Vinicius Ernani
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | | | | | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Anderson JD, Voss MM, Laughlin BS, Garda AE, Aziz K, Mullikin TC, Haddock MG, Petersen IA, DeWees TA, Vora SA. Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy Compared With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Uterine Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2022; 9:10-17. [PMID: 36721479 PMCID: PMC9875825 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00020.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To compare Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in patients with endometrial cancer receiving adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy with proton beam therapy (PT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Materials and Methods Patients with uterine cancer treated with curative intent who received either adjuvant PT or IMRT between 2014 and 2020 were identified. Patients were enrolled into a prospective registry using a gynecologic-specific subset of PRO-CTCAE designed to assess symptom impact on daily living. Questions included gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms of diarrhea, flatulence, bowel incontinence, and constipation in addition to other pertinent gynecologic, urinary, and other general symptoms. Symptom-based questions were on a 0- to 4-point scale, with grade 3+ symptoms occurring frequently or almost always. Patient-reported toxicity was analyzed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after treatment. Unequal variance t tests were used to determine if treatment type was a significant factor in baseline-adjusted PRO-CTCAE. Results Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty-two received PT and 45 patients received IMRT. Brachytherapy boost was delivered in 73% of patients. Median external beam dose was 45 Gy for both PT and IMRT (range, 45-58.8 Gy). When comparing PRO-CTCAE, PT was associated with less diarrhea at EOT (P = .01) and at 12 months (P = .24) than IMRT. Loss of bowel control at 12 months was more common in patients receiving IMRT (P = .15). Any patient reporting grade 3+ GI toxicity was noted more frequently with IMRT (31% versus 9%, P = .09). Discussion Adjuvant PT is a promising treatment for patients with uterine cancer and may reduce patient-reported GI toxicity as compared with IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Molly M. Voss
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Allison E. Garda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Khaled Aziz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Trey C. Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Ivy A. Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Sujay A. Vora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Laughlin BS, Bhangoo RS, Thorpe CS, Golafshar MA, DeWees TA, Anderson JD, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, Wong WW, Halyard MY, Keole SR, Vargas CE. Patient-reported outcomes for patients with breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy: A single-center registry experience. Front Oncol 2022; 12:920739. [PMID: 36091145 PMCID: PMC9458857 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.920739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We present Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) for patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer with curative intent. We describe the frequency and severity of PRO-CTCAE and analyze them with respect to dose fractionation. Methods Patients were included in this study if they were treated with curative intent for breast cancer and enrolled on a prospective registry. Patients must have completed at least one baseline and one post-radiation survey that addressed PRO-CTCAE. For univariate and multivariate analysis, categorical variables were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test and continuous variables by Wilcoxon rank sum test. PRO-CTCAE items graded ≥2 and ≥3 were analyzed between patients who received hypofractionation (HF) versus standard conventional fractionation (CF) therapy by the Chi-square test. Results Three hundred thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Pathologic tumor stage was T1–T2 in 309 (94%) patients. Eighty-seven (29%) patients were node positive. Two hundred forty-seven patients (75%) experienced any PRO-CTCAE grade ≥2, and 92 (28%) patients experienced any PRO-CTCAE grade ≥3. CF was found to be associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 skin toxicity, swallowing, and nausea (all p < 0.01). HF (OR 0.48, p < 0.01) was significant in the multivariate model for decreased risk of any occurrence of PRO-CTCAE ≥3. Conclusions Our study reports one of the first clinical experiences utilizing multiple PRO-CTCAE items for patients with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy with curative intent. Compared with CF, HF was associated with a significant decrease in any PRO-CTCAE ≥3 after multivariate analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S. Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Ronik S. Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Cameron S. Thorpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Michael A. Golafshar
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States
| | - Justin D. Anderson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | | | - Lisa A. McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Michele Y. Halyard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Carlos E. Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, United States
- *Correspondence: Carlos E. Vargas,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buras MR, Breen WG, Laack NN, Gross TV, Zaniletti I, Leavitt T, Golafshar MA, Voss MM, Mahajan A, Keole SR, Ahmed SK, Ulbrich A, Daniels TB, DeWees TA. Patient vs. Caregiver: Correlation and Differences in Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Using a Prospective Registry in a Large-Volume, Multi-Site Practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 114:472-477. [PMID: 35840115 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient reported outcomes (PROs) provide quality of life (QOL) data during and after radiation. When pediatric patients are unable to complete PROs, it is unknown whether caregiver responses are an accurate surrogate. We assessed whether caregiver scores for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Core and Brain Tumor Module questionnaires can substitute for missing child scores. METHODS AND MATERIALS From 2016-2018, pediatric patients treated with radiation were followed in a prospective, institutional registry. Child and caregiver Core and Tumor PedsQL surveys were obtained at pre-treatment, end of treatment, and in regular follow-up. The differences between the two scores at each time point were quantified using a linear mixed-model (LMM) while the level of agreement was estimated with intraclass correlation (ICC). An ICC 95% confidence interval lower limit exceeding 0.75 was considered an acceptable threshold for using caregiver scores as imputed values for missing child scores. RESULTS Ninety-one children completed 403 surveys. Caregivers underestimated QOL scores at baseline, but not at end of treatment or any follow-up time. The PedsQL Core total score had an ICC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.92), while the emotional, physical, school, and social function subdomain scores were 0.81 (0.72-0.88), 0.72 (0.58-0.82), 0.79 (0.68-0.86), and 0.75 (0.62-0.83), respectively. The Tumor total score ICC was 0.91 (0.85, 0.94), and each of the subdomains (cognitive problems, communication, movement and balance, nausea, pain and hurt, perceived physical appearance, procedural anxiety, treatment anxiety, and worry) had ICC lower bound 95% CI ≥ 0.75 except for communication (0.83, 0.74-0.89). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated no visual change in discrepancy between child and caregiver estimates as overall QOL improved. CONCLUSION Agreement between child and caregiver-reported QOL was generally strong in the acute period after radiation, implying that caregiver scores may be imputed for child scores in future protocols and analyses of pediatric QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Buras
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Scottsdale, USA
| | - William G Breen
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, USA
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, USA
| | | | | | - Todd Leavitt
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Scottsdale, USA
| | | | - Molly M Voss
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Scottsdale, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, USA
| | - Sameer R Keole
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Phoenix, USA
| | - Safia K Ahmed
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester, USA
| | - Annissa Ulbrich
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Scottsdale, USA
| | | | - Todd A DeWees
- Mayo Clinic, Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Scottsdale, USA; Mayo Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Phoenix, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bhangoo RS, Cheng TW, Petersen MM, Thorpe CS, DeWees TA, Anderson JD, Vargas CE, Patel SH, Halyard MY, Schild SE, Wong WW. Radiation recall dermatitis: A review of the literature. Semin Oncol 2022; 49:152-159. [DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
24
|
Vargas CE, Daniels T, Golafshar MA, Keole SR, Wong W, Rwigema JC, Davis B, DeWees TA, Stish BJ, Choo R, Lester S. A phase II trial of hypofractionated radiation therapy over five treatments for prostate cancer with high-risk features after radical prostatectomy: MC1754. J Clin Oncol 2022. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2022.40.6_suppl.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
248 Background: Hypofractionated prostate cancer radiation has showed similar results in several prior phase III studies (PCG GU 003, PACE-B, and Hypo PC RT). However, prospective phase II-III clinical trial data testing 5 tx after prostatectomy is scarce. Methods: Between 2018 and 2019, 41 patients were treated after postprostatectomy for high risk features. 5 patients were treated adjuvantly, 36 for salvage including 8 with oligometastatic disease. Indications for adjuvant RT included a PSA < 0.2 and +margins, SVI, or EPE. Salvage RT was offered for PSA ≥0.2. Oligometastatic RT for patients with ≤5 RT targets. Staging included C11 PET for all cases. Total dose to the prostate bed was 30-32 Gy in 5tx QOD with IMRT, conebeam IGRT, and MRI registration. All salvage patients received ADT for 6 months and oligometastatic patients for 18 months. Dose to the metastatic sites was 30 in 5tx QOD. Of the 41 patients 8 also received SBRT to the sites of oligometastatic disease. We looked at clinical outcomes defining biochemical failure as a PSA > 0.2 after treatment, baseline adjusted CTC AE V5.0, baseline adjusted patient reported toxicities (PRO CTC AE), QOL (EPIC, PROMIS), and AUA was used for all cases. Results: Median follow up was 23 months (range 10-37). Pre-RT T stage was T2-T3b, with 47% being T3a-b; Pre RT Median PSA of 0.4 (range < 0.1-1.9); Median GS 8 (6-9); and (+) margins in 48.8%. Sites of oligometastatic disease radiated included the LN and bone. Treatment related AE were grade 0-1 in all cases, except for one patient with G2 GU incontinence. Overall QOL remained high during follow including Promis 10 overall, mental, and physical scores; urinary bother, irritative/obstructive, and AUA scores; bowel overall, bowel bother, and bowel function scores; and overall sexual, sexual function, and sexual bother scores remained at baseline levels during follow up. Only hormonal overall, hormonal function, and hormonal bother had lower scores at 3 months that recovered by 12 months in patients treated with ADT for 6 months and by 24 months in patients treated with ADT for 18 months. A total of 3 clinical failure have been seen; 2 patients with regional failures alone; and one with axial skeleton bony failures for 93% clinical control at median follow up of 23 months. All 3 patients with clinical failure were salvaged successfully with SBRT and all patients remain disease free at last follow up. A total 5 patients with raising PSAs alone have been seen. All patients have been re-staged with C11 PET. No failures in the prostate bed or previously radiated sites have been seen. Conclusions: Toxicity for RT over 5tx is lower than expected with only one case of grade 2 urinary incontinence. QOL scores remained high during follow up, minor changes in hormonal scores were seen during ADT, but recovered after. 30-32 Gy over 5 tx provided 100% control in radiated targets and metastatic sites. Clinical trial information: NCT03570827.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Richard Choo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Laughlin BS, Petersen MM, Yu NY, Anderson JD, Rule WG, Borad MJ, Aqel BA, Sonbol MB, Mathur AK, Moss AA, Bekaii-Saab TS, Ahn DH, DeWees TA, Sio TT, Ashman JB. Clinical outcomes for hilar and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with adjuvant, definitive, or liver transplant-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy strategies: a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 13:288-297. [PMID: 35284111 PMCID: PMC8899753 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report our experience with 3 strategies for treating hilar and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) including chemoradiotherapy: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and orthotopic liver transplant, surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT), and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). METHODS We included patients treated from 1998 through 2019. Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank testing, and univariate/multivariate Cox models were used to assess outcomes (local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival). RESULTS Sixty-five patients (nCRT, n=20; aCRT, n=16; dCRT, n=29) met inclusion criteria [median (range) age 65 years (27-84 years)]. Median posttreatment follow-up was 19.1 months (0.8-164.8 months) for all patients and 38.6, 24.3, and 9.0 months for the nCRT, aCRT, and dCRT groups, respectively. At 3 and 5 years, overall survival was 78% and 59% for the nCRT group; 47% and 35%, aCRT group; and 11% and 0%, dCRT group. Compared with the dCRT group, the nCRT group (hazard ratio =0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.33) and the aCRT group (hazard ratio =0.29, 95% CI: 0.14-0.64) had significantly improved overall survival (P<0.001). The 5-year local progression-free survival (50% nCRT vs. 30% aCRT vs. 0% dCRT, P<0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival (61% nCRT vs. 30% aCRT vs. 0% dCRT, P=0.01) were significantly better for strategies combined with surgery. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes for patients with extrahepatic CCA were superior for those who underwent nCRT/orthotopic liver transplant or postsurgical aCRT than for patients treated with dCRT. The excellent outcomes after nCRT/orthotopic liver transplant provide additional independent data supporting the validity of this strategy. The poor survival of patients treated with dCRT highlights a need for better therapies when surgery is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S. Laughlin
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Molly M. Petersen
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Justin D. Anderson
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - William G. Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mitesh J. Borad
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Bashar A. Aqel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mohamad B. Sonbol
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Amit K. Mathur
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Adyr A. Moss
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Daniel H. Ahn
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Terence T. Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jonathan B. Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Thorpe CS, DeWees TA, Golafshar MA, Bhangoo RS, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, Wong WW, Halyard MY, Keole SR, Vargas CE. Patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events and quality-of-life linear analogue self-assessment in breast cancer patients receiving radiation therapy: single-institution prospective registry. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2022; 6:3. [PMID: 35006393 PMCID: PMC8748600 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-021-00408-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/objectives We sought to investigate the impact of patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE) on overall quality-of-life (QOL) employing linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT). Materials/methods All patients treated with RT for BC with curative intent from 2015 to 2019 at our institution were included. Breast specific PRO-CTCAE and overall QOL LASA questionnaires were administered at baseline, end-of-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months, and then annually. Minimal clinically important difference in overall QOL was a 10-point change in LASA. Hypofractionation was any treatment > 2 Gy per fraction. Mixed models for repeated measures were used to determine the association of PRO-CTCAE and overall QOL LASA. Results Three hundred thirty-one (331) patients with a median follow-up of 3.1 years (range 0.4–4.9) were included. Average overall QOL LASA scores were 78.5 at baseline, 79.8 at end-of-treatment, 79.8 at 3 months, 77.1 at 6 months, 79.4 at 12 months, and 79.7 at 24 months. On univariate analysis, patients reporting a grade ≥ 3 PRO-CTCAE had, on average, a 10.4-point reduction in overall LASA QOL (p < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, not being treated with hypofractionation and higher BMI were predictive for worse overall LASA QOL with a 10-point reduction in LASA for patients reporting a grade ≥ 3 PRO-CTCAE (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Patients reporting a grade ≥ 3 PRO-CTCAE experienced statistically significant and clinically meaningful deterioration in overall QOL LASA. Hypofractionation improved QOL while higher BMI predicted for worse QOL. PRO-CTCAE should be integrated into future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C S Thorpe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - T A DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - M A Golafshar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - R S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - T Z Vern-Gross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - L A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - W W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - M Y Halyard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - S R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - C E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5881 E Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bulman GF, Bhangoo RS, DeWees TA, Petersen MM, Thorpe CS, Wong WW, Rwigema JCM, Daniels TB, Keole SR, Schild SE, Vargas CE. Dose-volume histogram parameters and patient-reported EPIC-Bowel domain in prostate cancer proton therapy. Radiat Oncol J 2021; 39:122-128. [PMID: 34619829 PMCID: PMC8497859 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2021.00388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To analyze rectal dose and changes in quality of life (QOL) measured with the Expanded Prostate and Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) bowel domain in patients being treated for prostate cancer with curative-intent proton beam therapy (PBT) within a large single-institution prospective registry. Materials and Methods Data was collected from 243 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with PBT from 2016 to 2018. The EPIC survey was administered at baseline, end-of-treatment, 3, 6, and 12 months, then annually. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters for the rectum were computed, and rectal dose was analyzed using BED (α/β = 3), EQD2Gy, and total dose. Repeated measures mixed models were implemented to determine the effect of patient, clinical, and treatment factors (including DVH) on patient-reported bowel symptom burden (EPIC-Bowel). Results Treatment overall resulted in changes in EPIC-Bowel scores (baseline score = 93.7), most notably at end-of-treatment (90.6) and 12 months (89.7). However, they returned to baseline at 36 months (92.9). On multivariate modeling, rectal BED D25 (Gy) ≥23% was significantly associated with decline in QOL scores measuring bother (p < 0.01; 4.06 points different). Conclusion Rectal doses, specifically BED D25 (Gy) ≥23%, are significantly associated with decline in bowel bother-related QOL in patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. This study demonstrates BED as an independent predictor of bowel QOL across dose fractionations of PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Molly M Petersen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Sameer R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bhangoo RS, Petersen MM, Bulman GF, Vargas CE, Thorpe CS, Shen J, Wong WW, Rwigema JCM, Daniels TB, Keole SR, Schild SE, Rong Y, DeWees TA. Biologically Effective Dose and Rectal Bleeding in Definitive Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:37-46. [PMID: 35530190 PMCID: PMC9009455 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-21-00007.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose and Objectives With increasing use of hypofractionation and extreme hypofractionation for prostate cancer, rectal dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters that apply across dose fractionations may be helpful for treatment planning in clinical practice. We present an exploratory analysis of biologically effective rectal dose (BED) and equivalent rectal dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) for rectal bleeding in patients treated with proton therapy across dose fractionations. Materials and Methods From 2016 to 2018, 243 patients with prostate cancer were treated with definitive proton therapy. Rectal DVH parameters were obtained from treatment plans, and rectal bleeding events were recorded. The BED and EQD2 transformations were applied to each rectal DVH parameter. Univariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine DVH parameters that were significant predictors of grade ≥ 2 rectal bleeding. Youden index was used to determine optimum cutoffs for clinically meaningful DVH constraints. Stepwise model-selection criteria were then applied to fit a “best” multivariate logistic model for predicting Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥ 2 rectal bleeding. Results Conventional fractionation, hypofractionation, and extreme hypofractionation were prescribed to 117 (48%), 84 (34%), and 42 (17.3%) patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 20 (2.5-40) months, 10 (4.1%) patients experienced rectal bleeding. On univariate analysis, multiple rectal DVH parameters were significantly associated with rectal bleeding across BED, EQD2, and nominal doses. The BED volume receiving 55 Gy > 13.91% was found to be statistically and clinically significant. The BED volume receiving 55 Gy remained statistically significant for an association with rectal bleeding in the multivariate model (odds ratio, 9.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-40.5; P = .002). Conclusion In patients undergoing definitive proton therapy for prostate cancer, dose to the rectum and volume of the rectum receiving the dose were significantly associated with rectal bleeding across conventional fractionation, hypofractionation, and extreme hypofractionation when using BED and EQD2 transformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Molly M. Petersen
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | | | | | - Jason Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William W. Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - Sameer R. Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bhangoo RS, Mullikin TC, Ashman JB, Cheng TW, Golafshar MA, DeWees TA, Johnson JE, Shiraishi S, Liu W, Hu Y, Merrell KW, Haddock MG, Krishnan S, Rule WG, Sio TT, Hallemeier CL. Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Initial Clinical Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100675. [PMID: 34409199 PMCID: PMC8361033 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our purpose was to assess the safety and efficacy of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods and Materials A retrospective review was conducted on all patients who were treated with IMPT for HCC with curative intent from June 2015 to December 2018. All patients had fiducials placed before treatment. Inverse treatment planning used robust optimization with 2 to 3 beams. The majority of patients were treated in 15 fractions (n = 30, 81%, 52.5-67.5 Gy, relative biological effectiveness), whereas the remainder were treated in 5 fractions (n = 7, 19%, 37.5-50 Gy, relative biological effectiveness). Daily image guidance consisted of orthogonal kilovoltage x-rays and use of a 6° of freedom robotic couch. Outcomes (local control, progression free survival, and overall survival) were determined using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Thirty-seven patients were included. The median follow-up for living patients was 21 months (Q1-Q3, 17-30 months). Pretreatment Child-Pugh score was A5-6 in 70% of patients and B7-9 in 30% of patients. Nineteen patients had prior liver directed therapy for HCC before IMPT. Eight patients (22%) required a replan during treatment, most commonly due to inadequate clinical target volume coverage. One patient (3%) experienced a grade 3 acute toxicity (pain) with no recorded grade 4 or 5 toxicities. An increase in Child-Pugh score by ≥ 2 within 3 months of treatment was observed in 6 patients (16%). At 1 year, local control was 94%, intrahepatic control was 54%, progression free survival was 35%, and overall survival was 78%. Conclusions IMPT is safe and feasible for treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Tiffany W Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.,Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | | | - Satomi Shiraishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Yanle Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - William G Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yang Y, Vargas CE, Bhangoo RS, Wong WW, Schild SE, Daniels TB, Keole SR, Rwigema JCM, Glass JL, Shen J, DeWees TA, Liu T, Bues M, Fatyga M, Liu W. Exploratory Investigation of Dose-Linear Energy Transfer (LET) Volume Histogram (DLVH) for Adverse Events Study in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1189-1199. [PMID: 33621660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We proposed a novel tool-a dose linear energy transfer (LET)-volume histogram (DLVH)-and performed an exploratory study to investigate rectal bleeding in prostate cancer treated with intensity modulated proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS The DLVH was constructed with dose and LET as 2 axes, and the normalized volume of the structure was contoured in the dose-LET plane as isovolume lines. We defined the DLVH index, DLv%(d,l) (ie, v% of the structure) to have a dose of ≥d Gy and an LET of ≥l keV/μm, similar to the dose-volume histogram index Dv%. Nine patients with prostate cancer with rectal bleeding (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥2) were included as the adverse event group, and 48 patients with no complications were considered the control group. A P value map was constructed by comparison of the DLVH indices of all patients between the 2 groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. Dose-LET volume constraints (DLVCs) were derived based on the P value map with a manual selection procedure facilitated by Spearman's correlation tests. The obtained DLVCs were further cross-validated using a multivariate support vector machine (SVM)-based normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model with an independent testing data set composed of 8 adverse event and 13 control patients. RESULTS We extracted 2 DLVC constraints. One DLVC was obtained, Vdose/LETboundary:2.5keVμmat 75 Gy to 3.2keVμmat8.65Gy <1.27% (DLVC1), revealing a high LET volume effect. The second DLVC, V(72.2Gy,0keVμm) < 2.23% (DVLC2), revealed a high dose volume effect. The SVM-based NTCP model with 2 DLVCs provided slightly superior performance than using dose only, with an area under the curve of 0.798 versus 0.779 for the testing data set. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrated the importance of rectal "hot spots" in both high LET (DLVC1) and high dose (DLVC2) in inducing rectal bleeding. The SVM-based NTCP model confirmed the derived DLVCs as good predictors for rectal bleeding when intensity modulated proton therapy is used to treat prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunze Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Thomas B Daniels
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Sameer R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Jennifer L Glass
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Division of Biostatics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Tianming Liu
- Department of Computer Science, the University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Martin Bues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Mirek Fatyga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Floberg JM, Zhang J, Muhammad N, DeWees TA, Inkman M, Chen K, Lin AJ, Rashmi R, Jayachandran K, Edelson BT, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Grigsby PW, Markovina S, Schwarz JK. Standardized Uptake Value for 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Is a Marker of Inflammatory State and Immune Infiltrate in Cervical Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:4245-4255. [PMID: 33820781 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer fails in over a third of patients. Biomarkers with therapeutic implications are therefore needed. We investigated the relationship between an established prognostic marker, maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, and the inflammatory and immune state of cervical cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN An SUVmax most prognostic for freedom from progression (FFP) was identified and compared with known prognostic clinical variables in a cohort of 318 patients treated with definitive radiation with prospectively collected clinical data. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and CIBERSORT of whole-transcriptome data from 68 patients were used to identify biological pathways and immune cell subpopulations associated with high SUVmax. IHC using a tissue microarray (TMA, N = 82) was used to validate the CIBERSORT findings. The impact of macrophages on cervical cancer glucose metabolism was investigated in coculture experiments. RESULTS SUVmax <11.4 was most prognostic for FFP (P = 0.001). The GSEA showed that high SUVmax is associated with increased gene expression of inflammatory pathways, including JAK/STAT3 signaling. CIBERSORT and CD68 staining of the TMA showed high SUVmax tumors are characterized by a monocyte-predominant immune infiltrate. Coculture of cervical cancer cells with macrophages or macrophage-conditioned media altered glucose uptake, and IL6 and JAK/STAT3 signaling contribute to this effect. CONCLUSIONS SUVmax is a prognostic marker in cervical cancer that is associated with activation of inflammatory pathways and tumor infiltration of myeloid-derived immune cells, particularly macrophages. Macrophages contribute to changes in cervical cancer glucose metabolism.See related commentary by Williamson et al., p. 4136.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Floberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Jin Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Naoshad Muhammad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Matthew Inkman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kevin Chen
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Alexander J Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ramachandran Rashmi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kay Jayachandran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian T Edelson
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Barry A Siegel
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Farrokh Dehdashti
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Perry W Grigsby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Stephanie Markovina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Julie K Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. .,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Allred BC, Shan J, Robertson DG, DeWees TA, Shen J, Liu W, Stoker JB. A method for quantitative evaluations of scanning-proton dose distributions. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:193-201. [PMID: 33780142 PMCID: PMC8035555 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 01/14/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patient-Specific Quality Assurance (PSQA) measurement analysis depends on generating metrics representative of calculation and measurement agreement. Considering the heightened capability of discrete spot scanning protons to modulate individual dose voxels, a dose plane comparison approach that maintained all of the capabilities of the well-established γ test, but that also provided a more intuitive error parameterization, was desired. METHODS Analysis was performed for 300 dose planes compared by searching all calculated points within a fixed radius around each measured pixel to determine the dose deviation. Dose plane agreement is reported as the dose difference minimum (DDM) within an empirically established search radius: ΔDmin(r). This per-pixel metric is aggregated into a histogram binned by dose deviation. Search-radius criteria were based on a weighted-beamlet 3σ spatial deviation from imaging isocenter. Equipment setup error was mitigated during analysis using tracked image registration, ensuring beamlet deviations to be the dominant source of spatial error. The percentage of comparison points with <3% dose difference determined pass rate. RESULTS The mean beamlet radial deviation was 0.38mm from x-ray isocenter, with a standard deviation of 0.19mm, such that 99.9% of relevant pencil beams were within 1 mm of nominal. The dose-plane comparison data showed no change in passing rate between a 3%/1mm ΔDmin(r) analysis (97.6 +/- 3.6%) and a 3%/2mm γ test (97.7 +/- 3.2%). CONCLUSIONS PSQA dose-comparison agreements corresponding to a search radius outside of machine performance limits are likely false positives. However, the elliptical shape of the γ test is too dose-restrictive with a spatial-error threshold set at 1 mm. This work introduces a cylindrical search shape, proposed herein as more relevant to plan quality, as part of the new DDM planar-dose comparison algorithm. DDM accepts all pixels within a given dose threshold inside the search radius, and carries forward plan-quality metrics in a straightforward manner for evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryce C Allred
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Jiajian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Joshua B Stoker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Anderson JD, Hammond JB, Kosiorek HE, Thorpe CS, Bhangoo RS, Pockaj BA, Gray RJ, Cronin PA, Rebecca AM, Casey WJ, Wong WW, Keole SR, Vern-Gross TZ, McGee LA, Halyard MY, DeWees TA, Vargas CE. Unplanned implant removal in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast J 2021; 27:466-471. [PMID: 33715231 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Study conducted to determine frequency and timing of unplanned breast implant removal after mastectomy, reconstruction, and postmastectomy radiation (PMRT). From 2010-2017, 52 patients underwent mastectomy, reconstruction, and PMRT. With median follow-up of 3.1 years, 23 patients (44%) experienced implant removal. Implant removal occurred in 9 (17%) patients before starting PMRT and 14 (27%) patients after starting PMRT. Implant removal rates were similar for hypofractionated PMRT compared with standard fractionation and for proton compared with photon PMRT. Implant removal is common for women undergoing mastectomy and reconstruction followed by PMRT. The risk is clinically significant even before starting radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob B Hammond
- Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Heidi E Kosiorek
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Ronik S Bhangoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Richard J Gray
- Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | | - William J Casey
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sameer R Keole
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zahrieh D, Golafshar MA, Patel SH, DeWees TA. Quantification of Potential Inequities in Breast Cancer Incidence in New Mexico Through Bayesian Disease Mapping. Prev Chronic Dis 2021; 18:E23. [PMID: 33705303 PMCID: PMC7986972 DOI: 10.5888/pcd18.200468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The incidence of breast cancer among non-Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women varies across the United States. We applied county-level Bayesian disease mapping to quantify potential inequities in 10-year breast cancer incidence in New Mexico to better inform health equity initiatives among its non-Hispanic at-risk AI/AN population. METHODS We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program from 2005 through 2014 to identify new cases of breast cancer in New Mexico's 33 counties. To account for spatial variation, a county-level Area Deprivation Index, and the small area estimation problem inherent in these data, we borrowed strength globally and locally by applying Bayesian disease mapping to the counts of age-adjusted county-level breast cancer incidence. We quantified the disparity effect, as measured by the age-adjusted rate ratio, comparing the incidence of breast cancer between at-risk non-Hispanic AI/AN and non-Hispanic White women and assessed whether the ratio differed among counties. RESULTS Accounting for over-dispersion and spatial correlation among the 33 counties and a county-level Area Deprivation Index, the posterior mean of the overall age-adjusted rate ratio was 0.384 (95% credible interval, 0.253--0.546). The age-adjusted rate of breast cancer in non-Hispanic AI/AN women was 0.38 times the corresponding age-adjusted rate for non-Hispanic White women; however, a significant reduction in breast cancer incidence was observed in 16 of the 33 counties. CONCLUSION The application of Bayesian disease mapping to these data provided substantial evidence of an overall disparity in breast cancer incidence between at-risk non-Hispanic AI/AN and non-Hispanic White women in New Mexico, which was more marked than previously reported and limited to certain counties. Targeted statewide and county-level health-equity initiatives may lead to a reduction in these disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Zahrieh
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
| | | | - Samir H Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kennedy WR, DeWees TA, Acharya S, Mahmood M, Knutson NC, Goddu SM, Kavanaugh JA, Mitchell TJ, Rich KM, Kim AH, Leuthardt EC, Dowling JL, Dunn GP, Chicoine MR, Perkins SM, Huang J, Tsien CI, Robinson CG, Abraham CD. Internal dose escalation associated with increased local control for melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2020:1-7. [PMID: 33307528 DOI: 10.3171/2020.7.jns192210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The internal high-dose volume varies widely for a given prescribed dose during stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to treat brain metastases (BMs). This may be altered during treatment planning, and the authors have previously shown that this improves local control (LC) for non-small cell lung cancer BMs without increasing toxicity. Here, they seek to identify potentially actionable dosimetric predictors of LC after SRS for melanoma BM. METHODS The records of patients with unresected melanoma BM treated with single-fraction Gamma Knife RS between 2006 and 2017 were reviewed. LC was assessed on a per-lesion basis, defined as stability or a decrease in lesion size. Outcome-oriented approaches were utilized to determine optimal dichotomization for dosimetric variables relative to LC. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis was implemented to evaluate the impact of collected parameters on LC. RESULTS Two hundred eighty-seven melanoma BMs in 79 patients were identified. The median age was 56 years (range 31-86 years). The median follow-up was 7.6 months (range 0.5-81.6 months), and the median survival was 9.3 months (range 1.3-81.6 months). Lesions were optimally stratified by volume receiving at least 30 Gy (V30) greater than or equal to versus less than 25%. V30 was ≥ and < 25% in 147 and 140 lesions, respectively. For all patients, 1-year LC was 83% versus 66% for V30 ≥ and < 25%, respectively (p = 0.001). Stratifying by volume, lesions 2 cm or less (n = 215) had 1-year LC of 82% versus 70% (p = 0.013) for V30 ≥ and < 25%, respectively. Lesions > 2 to 3 cm (n = 32) had 1-year LC of 100% versus 43% (p = 0.214) for V30 ≥ and < 25%, respectively. V30 was still predictive of LC even after controlling for the use of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Radionecrosis occurred in 2.8% of lesions and was not significantly associated with V30. CONCLUSIONS For a given prescription dose, an increased internal high-dose volume, as indicated by measures such as V30 ≥ 25%, is associated with improved LC but not increased toxicity in single-fraction SRS for melanoma BM. Internal dose escalation is an independent predictor of improved LC even in patients receiving immunotherapy and/or targeted therapy. This represents a dosimetric parameter that is actionable at the time of treatment planning and warrants further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Todd A DeWees
- 2Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona; and
| | - Sahaja Acharya
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Keith M Rich
- 4Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Albert H Kim
- 4Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Eric C Leuthardt
- 4Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Joshua L Dowling
- 4Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Gavin P Dunn
- 4Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael R Chicoine
- 4Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Patel SH, Ebrahimi S, Northfelt DW, Mathews TE, Omar FM, Martinez ED, DeWees TA, Okamoto JM. Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy. Cancer Control 2020; 27:1073274820945991. [PMID: 32735143 PMCID: PMC7658722 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820945991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Many American Indian (AI) and Alaska native (AN) patients do not complete guideline-concordant cancer care for the 4 most common cancers. Our aim was to better understand AI/AN attitudes toward radiation therapy (RT). Patients eligible for this survey study were AI/AN patients with cancer at the Phoenix Indian Medical Center who either received previous RT or were recommended to receive RT. An 18-item questionnaire was administered to each of the 50 participants from October 1, 2018, through February 15, 2019. Willingness to travel for RT was compared to respondent characteristics, concerns regarding RT, and obstacles to obtain RT. Duration of RT was important to 78% of patients: 24% would consider traveling 25 miles or more for a standard course, and 48% would travel that distance for a shorter course (P < .001). The top-ranked barriers to RT were transportation, cost of treatment, and insurance compatibility. The top-ranked concerns about RT were adverse effects, cost of treatment, and fear of RT. Concerns about adverse effects were associated with the radiation team's inability to explain the treatment (P = .05). Transportation concerns were significantly associated with accessibility (P = .02), communication with the RT team (P = .02), and fear of RT (P = .04). AI/AN patients are concerned about the adverse effects of RT and the logistics of treatment, particularly costs, transportation, and insurance compatibility. Use of culturally specific education and hypofractionation regimens may increase acceptance of RT for AI/AN patients with cancer, and this hypothesis will be tested in a future educational intervention-based study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sasha Ebrahimi
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Donald W. Northfelt
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Timothy E. Mathews
- Oncology Center of Excellence, Phoenix Indian Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Farhia M. Omar
- Office of Health Disparities Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Erika D. Martinez
- Office of Health Disparities Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rudra S, Fuser D, DeWees TA, Wan L, Gang M, Hui CY, Rao YJ, Siegel BA, Dehdashti F, Mutch DG, Powell MA, Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW, Chen DL, Markovina S. Radiologic Assessment of Groin Lymph Nodes in Pelvic Malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:947-953. [PMID: 32487684 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 04/26/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Metastatic involvement of groin nodes can alter radiation therapy planning for pelvic tumors. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can identify nodal metastases; however, interpretation of PET/CT-positive nodes can be complicated by non-malignant processes. We evaluated quantitative metrics as methods to identify groin metastases in patients with pelvic tumors by comparison with standard subjective interpretive criteria, with pathology as the reference standard. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with vulvar, vaginal, or anal cancers who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT before pathologic evaluation of groin nodes between 2007 and 2017. Because patho-radiologic correlation was not possible for every node, one index node identified on imaging was selected for each groin. For each index node, standardized uptake value measurements, total lesion glycolysis, metabolic tumor volume, CT-based volume, and short and long axes were measured. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify metrics predictive for pathologically positive groins and generate a probabilistic model. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the model were compared with clinical interpretation from the diagnostic report via a Wald's χ2 test. RESULTS Of 55 patients identified for analysis, 75 groins had pathologic evaluation resulting in 75 index groin nodes for analysis with 35 groins pathologically positive for malignancy. Logistic regression identified mean standardized-uptake-value (50% threshold) and short-axis length as the most predictive imaging metrics for metastatic nodal involvement. The probabilistic model performed better at predicting pathologic involvement compared with standard clinical interpretation on analysis (AUC 0.91, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.97 vs 0.80, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89; p<0.01). DISCUSSION Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting groin nodal metastases in patients with pelvic tumors may be improved with the use of quantitative metrics. Improving prediction of nodal metastases can aid with appropriate selection of patients for pathologic node evaluation and guide radiation volumes and doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soumon Rudra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Dominique Fuser
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Leping Wan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Margery Gang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Caressa Y Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Yuan J Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Barry A Siegel
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.,Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Farrokh Dehdashti
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.,Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - David G Mutch
- Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.,Division of Gynecology Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Julie K Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.,Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Perry W Grigsby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.,Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.,Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Delphine L Chen
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Stephanie Markovina
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in Saint Louis, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA .,Alvin J Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zahrieh D, Golafshar MA, Patel SH, DeWees TA. Quantification of inequities in breast cancer incidence in New Mexico through Bayesian disease mapping. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e13617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e13617 Background: Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent cancer of women in the United States (US). The incidence rates for BC among American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) women vary across the US. A novel application of Bayesian disease mapping was applied to quantify potential inequities in 10-year BC incidence in New Mexico (NM) in order to better inform health equity initiatives within the AI/AN at-risk population. Methods: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data from 2005 to 2014 were used to identify new cases of BC within the 33 counties in NM. Initially, a Poisson-gamma model was applied to quantify the reduction in risk of BC within the at-risk AI/AN population compared with the general at-risk population. To account for spatial variation and to address the small area estimation problem inherent in these data by borrowing strength globally and locally in NM, we applied Bayesian disease mapping to the counts of county-level BC cases. We quantified the disparity effect, as measured by the rate ratio (95% credible interval [CI]), comparing the incidence of BC between at-risk AI/AN and non-AI/AN women, and assessed if the rate ratio differed between counties. Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling was used to estimate posterior quantities and the deviance information criterion was used for model selection. Results: In 2010, 1,041,758 women were at-risk for BC of which 107,656 (10.3%) were AI/AN women. During the 10-year study period, 12,974 new BC cases were recorded in the general at-risk population. In the at-risk AI/AN population, the expected number of new cases during the 10-year study period, therefore, was 1,340.74; however, 597 incidence cases of BC were diagnosed in the at-risk AI/AN population resulting in a posterior mean for the true relative risk of 0.445 (95% CI: 0.410, 0.482). Based on the selected model that accounted for over dispersion and spatial correlation among the 33 counties, the posterior mean of the overall adjusted rate ratio was 0.405 (95% CI: 0.336, 0.478). The adjusted rate of BC in AI/AN women was 0.40 times the corresponding adjusted rate for women who were non-AI/AN. Further, the adjusted rate ratios were similar for each county. Conclusions: The novel application of Bayesian disease mapping to these data provided substantial evidence of a significant overall disparity effect in BC incidence within NM between at-risk AI/AN and non-AI/AN women, which was more marked than previous reports. Targeted state-wide health equity initiatives may lead to reducing disparities in BC incidence in AI/AN at-risk women.
Collapse
|
39
|
DeWees TA, Mazza GL, Golafshar MA, Dueck AC. Investigation Into the Effects of Using Normal Distribution Theory Methodology for Likert Scale Patient-Reported Outcome Data From Varying Underlying Distributions Including Floor/Ceiling Effects. Value Health 2020; 23:625-631. [PMID: 32389228 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Utilization of parametric or nonparametric methods for testing Likert scale data is often debated. This 2-part simulation study aims to investigate the sampling distribution of various Likert scale distributions (including floor/ceiling effects) and analyze the effectiveness of using parametric versus nonparametric tests with varying sample sizes. METHODS We simulated populations from parametric distributions binned into Likert scales. In study 1, replicates were sampled from each distribution with sizes ranging from 5 to 150 observations, calculating means with simulated 95% CIs at each sample size. In study 2, floor/ceiling effects were introduced such that the proportion of patients responding with the lowest rating varied from approximately 40% to 90%. Two-sample tests were then conducted for the 90% floor effect distribution against all other floor distributions to determine effectiveness of parametric versus nonparametric methods via 2-sided pooled t tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Coverage of the difference in means, realized P values, relative efficiency, measures of agreement in direction, and conclusion of tests were plotted by sample size. RESULTS The sampling distributions of the 1-sample means and SDs for most distributions converged quickly to Gaussian, with 95% coverage. One- and 2-sample t tests of the mean demonstrated acceptable coverage, type I error, and agreement. CONCLUSIONS Simulations confirm that the sampling distribution of the mean rapidly approaches normality and appropriate tests provide adequate coverage and type I error. Two-sample t tests demonstrate appropriateness and increased statistical power gained by using parametric over nonparametric approaches, suggesting t tests should be implemented with few restrictions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd A DeWees
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
| | - Gina L Mazza
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | | - Amylou C Dueck
- Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Altenhofen B, DeWees TA, Ahn JW, Yeat NC, Goddu S, Chen I, Lewis JS, Thorstad WL, Chole RA, Gay HA. Childhood tonsillectomy alters the primary distribution of HPV-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2020; 5:210-216. [PMID: 32337351 PMCID: PMC7178443 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated how tonsillectomy during childhood may influence the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive cancer of the tonsils in adult life using p16 as a surrogate marker for HPV infection. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective observational study. METHODS A total of 280 patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and known p16 status were eligible for this study. Each participant was called to obtain the childhood tonsillectomy history. Respondents were subgrouped by p16 status and the primary tumor location. Patient demographic and clinical information was analyzed for association with Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Location of tumor was modeled using univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) logistic regression with associated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Of the 280 patients, 115 (41%) were respondents: 104 (90.4%) were p16 positive and 11 (9.6%) were p16 negative. For p16 positive patients, we observed a majority (93%) of intact tonsils in those with tonsil cancer, compared to 45% of intact tonsils in patients with p16 positive cancer elsewhere in the oropharynx (P < .001). MVA logistic regression showed that female gender (OR = 4.16, P = .0675), prior smoking history (OR = 2.6, P = .0367), and intact tonsils (OR = 15.2, P < .0001) were associated with tonsillar OPSCC. CONCLUSION We found that patients with p16 positive OPSCC at a non-tonsil site were much more likely to have had prior tonsillectomy vs those with p16 positive OPSCC arising within the tonsil. Nevertheless, we do not advocate tonsillectomies as a public health policy to reduce HPV-related OPSCC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brannon Altenhofen
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative MedicineUCLALos AngelesCalifornia
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Division of Health Sciences ResearchMayo ClinicScottsdaleArizona
| | - Ji W. Ahn
- Department of DermatologyUniversity of Michigan HospitalsAnn ArborMichigan
| | - Nai C. Yeat
- Department of Internal MedicineMontefiore Medical CenterBronxNew York
| | - Shreya Goddu
- Washington University in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Ishita Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNew York
| | - James S. Lewis
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and ImmunologyVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleTennessee
- Department of OtolaryngologyVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleTennessee
| | - Wade L. Thorstad
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Richard A. Chole
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| | - Hiram A. Gay
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisSt. LouisMissouri
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kennedy WR, Thomas MA, Stanley JA, Luo J, Ochoa LL, Clifton KK, Cyr AE, Margenthaler JA, DeWees TA, Price A, Kashani R, Green O, Zoberi I. Single-Institution Phase 1/2 Prospective Clinical Trial of Single-Fraction, High-Gradient Adjuvant Partial-Breast Irradiation for Hormone Sensitive Stage 0-I Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:344-352. [PMID: 32084524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of a novel accelerated partial breast irradiation regimen delivered in a single fraction postoperatively. METHODS AND MATERIALS We enrolled 50 patients with low-risk, hormone-sensitive breast cancer from 2015 to 2018 on a prospective phase 1/2 trial to receive single-fraction, high-gradient partial-breast irradiation (SFHGPBI) 2 to 8 weeks after lumpectomy for node-negative, invasive, or in situ breast cancer. The high gradient was achieved by prescribing 20 Gy to the surgical bed and 5 Gy to the breast tissue within 1 cm of the surgical bed simultaneously in 1 fraction using external beam. RESULTS The median age was 65 (range, 52-84). Ten patients (20%) had small-volume ductal carcinoma in situ while the remainder had stage I disease. At a median follow-up of 25 months, we evaluated toxicity, patient- and physician-reported cosmesis, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), and initial tumor control. There was no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grade 3+ toxicity. Only 34% of patients experienced grade 1 erythema. Good-to-excellent pretreatment cosmesis was present in 100% and 98% per physicians and patients, respectively, and did not change post-SFHGPBI. Quantitative cosmesis by percentage of breast retraction assessment significantly improved over time during the post-SFHGPBI period per mixed repeated measures modeling (P = .0026). QOL per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaires C30 and BR-23 did not decline other than temporarily in the systemic therapy effects and hair loss domains, both of which returned to pretreatment values. There was 1 noninvasive in-breast recurrence in a separate untreated quadrant 18 months post-SFHGPBI and 1 isolated axillary recurrence 30 months post-SFHGPBI, both salvaged successfully. There were no distant recurrences or cancer-related deaths observed. CONCLUSIONS Accelerated partial-breast irradiation delivered in a single fraction postoperatively using external beam techniques is a novel, feasible, well-tolerated regimen. SFHGPBI does not adversely affect cosmesis or QOL as reported by both physicians and patients. Initial tumor control rates are excellent, with longer follow-up required to confirm efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Kennedy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Maria A Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jennifer A Stanley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jingqin Luo
- Department of Surgery, Siteman Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Laura L Ochoa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Katherine K Clifton
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Amy E Cyr
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Julie A Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Alex Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Rojano Kashani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Olga Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Imran Zoberi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yu NY, DeWees TA, Liu C, Daniels TB, Ashman JB, Beamer SE, Jaroszewski DE, Ross HJ, Paripati HR, Rwigema JCM, Ding JX, Shan J, Liu W, Schild SE, Sio TT. Early Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: The Mayo Clinic Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2019; 5:450-458. [PMID: 32529140 PMCID: PMC7276663 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose There are very little data available comparing outcomes of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC). Methods Seventy-nine consecutively treated patients with LA-NSCLC underwent definitive IMPT (n = 33 [42%]) or IMRT (n = 46 [58%]) from 2016 to 2018 at our institution. Survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Acute and subacute toxicities were graded based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03. Results Median follow-up was 10.5 months (range, 1-27) for all surviving patients. Most were stage III (80%), received median radiation therapy (RT) dose of 60 Gy (range, 45-72), and had concurrent chemotherapy (65%). At baseline, the IMPT cohort was older (76 vs 69 years, P < .01), were more likely to be oxygen-dependent (18 vs 2%, P = .02), and more often received reirradiation (27 vs 9%, P = .04) than their IMRT counterparts. At 1 year, the IMPT and IMRT cohorts had similar overall survival (68 vs 65%, P = .87), freedom from distant metastasis (71 vs 68%, P = .58), and freedom from locoregional recurrence (86 vs 69%, P = .11), respectively. On multivariate analyses, poorer pulmonary function and older age were associated with grade +3 toxicities during and 3 months after RT, respectively (both P ≤ .02). Only 5 (15%) IMPT and 4 (9%) IMRT patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicities 3 months after RT (P = .47). There was 1 treatment-related death from radiation pneumonitis 6 months after IMRT in a patient with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Conclusions Compared with IMRT, our early experience suggests that IMPT resulted in similar outcomes in a frailer population of LA-NSCLC who were more often being reirradiated. The role of IMPT remains to be defined prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Y Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Chenbin Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | | | - Staci E Beamer
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Helen J Ross
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Harshita R Paripati
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Julia X Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Jie Shan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Steven E Schild
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Fischer-Valuck BW, Michalski JM, Mitra N, Christodouleas JP, DeWees TA, Kim E, Smith ZL, Andriole GL, Arora V, Bullock A, Carmona R, Figenshau RS, Grubb RL, Guzzo TJ, Knoche EM, Malkowicz SB, Mamtani R, Pachynski RK, Roth BJ, Zaghloul MS, Gay HA, Baumann BC. Effectiveness of postoperative radiotherapy after radical cystectomy for locally advanced bladder cancer. Cancer Med 2019; 8:3698-3709. [PMID: 31119885 PMCID: PMC6639450 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local-regional failure (LF) for locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) after radical cystectomy (RC) is common even with chemotherapy and is associated with high morbidity/mortality. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) can reduce LF and may enhance overall survival (OS) but has no defined role. We hypothesized that the addition of PORT would improve OS in LABC in a large nationwide oncology database. METHODS We identified ≥ pT3pN0-3M0 LABC patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed 2004-2014 who underwent RC ± PORT. OS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to identify predictors of OS. Propensity matching was performed to match RC patients who received PORT vs those who did not. RESULTS 15,124 RC patients were identified with 512 (3.3%) receiving PORT. Median OS was 20.0 months (95% CI, 18.2-21.8) for PORT vs 20.8 months (95% CI, 20.3-21.3) for no PORT (P = 0.178). In multivariable analysis, PORT was independently associated with improved OS: hazard ratio 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78-0.97); P = 0.008. A one-to-three propensity match yielded 1,858 patients (24.9% receiving PORT and 75.1% without). In the propensity-matched cohort, median OS was 19.8 months (95% CI, 18.0-21.6) for PORT vs 16.9 months (95% CI, 15.6-18.1) for no PORT (P = 0.030). In the propensity-matched cohort of urothelial carcinoma patients (N = 1,460), PORT was associated with improved OS for pT4, pN+, and positive margins (P < 0.01 all). CONCLUSION In this observational cohort, PORT was associated with improved OS in LABC. While the data should be interpreted cautiously, these results lend support to the use of PORT in selected patients with LABC, regardless of histology. Prospective trials of PORT are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin W Fischer-Valuck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeff M Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Nandita Mitra
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - John P Christodouleas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.,Mayo Clinic, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Eric Kim
- Department of Urology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Zachary L Smith
- Department of Urology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Gerald L Andriole
- Department of Urology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Vivek Arora
- Department of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Arnold Bullock
- Department of Urology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ruben Carmona
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert S Figenshau
- Department of Urology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert L Grubb
- Department of Urology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Thomas J Guzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Eric M Knoche
- Department of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - S Bruce Malkowicz
- Department of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ronac Mamtani
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Russell K Pachynski
- Department of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Bruce J Roth
- Department of Medical Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Hiram A Gay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mazza GL, Kunze KL, Langlais BT, Kosiorek HE, DeWees TA, Geyer HL, Scherber RM, Mesa RA, Dueck AC. Item nonresponse on the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF): a comparison of missing data strategies. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 60:1789-1795. [PMID: 30652523 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1548705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Administering questionnaires to patients is an efficient and effective method for assessing patients' symptoms. However, item nonresponse (skipped questions) potentially compromises the utility of these questionnaires. Using an international sample of 2,067 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, we evaluated the impact of item nonresponse on scoring of the Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Symptom Assessment Form Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS or MPN-10). We characterized item nonresponse on the MPN-10 and compared strategies for addressing item nonresponse (available-case analysis, proration, and multiple imputation) on the MPN-10 (multi-symptom assessment) and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI; single-symptom assessment). Characteristics of multi-symptom assessments would be expected to adversely affect proration, yet proration and multiple imputation provided very similar results for both the MPN-10 and BFI. This is likely because the MPN-10 item missing data rates were low, consistent with prior clinic- and internet-based studies. These results support the published scoring method for the MPN-10 (proration).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina L Mazza
- a Mayo Clinic , Health Sciences Research , Scottsdale , AZ , USA
| | - Katie L Kunze
- a Mayo Clinic , Health Sciences Research , Scottsdale , AZ , USA
| | - Blake T Langlais
- a Mayo Clinic , Health Sciences Research , Scottsdale , AZ , USA
| | - Heidi E Kosiorek
- a Mayo Clinic , Health Sciences Research , Scottsdale , AZ , USA
| | - Todd A DeWees
- a Mayo Clinic , Health Sciences Research , Scottsdale , AZ , USA
| | - Holly L Geyer
- b Mayo Clinic , Internal Medicine , Phoenix , AZ , USA
| | - Robyn M Scherber
- c Mays Cancer Center , University of Texas Health San Antonio , San Antonio , TX , USA
| | - Ruben A Mesa
- c Mays Cancer Center , University of Texas Health San Antonio , San Antonio , TX , USA
| | - Amylou C Dueck
- a Mayo Clinic , Health Sciences Research , Scottsdale , AZ , USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kavanaugh JA, Holler S, DeWees TA, Robinson CG, Bradley JD, Iyengar P, Higgins KA, Mutic S, Olsen LA. Multi-Institutional Validation of a Knowledge-Based Planning Model for Patients Enrolled in RTOG 0617: Implications for Plan Quality Controls in Cooperative Group Trials. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 9:e218-e227. [PMID: 30562615 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a single-institution, knowledge-based planning (KBP) model as a dosimetric plan quality control (QC) for multi-institutional clinical trials. The efficacy of this QC tool was retrospectively evaluated using a subset of plans submitted to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) study 0617. METHODS AND MATERIALS A single KBP model was created using commercially available software (RapidPlan; Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) and data from 106 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who were treated at a single institution. All plans had prescriptions that ranged from 60 Gy in 30 fractions to 74 Gy in 37 fractions and followed the planning guidelines from RTOG 0617. Two sets of optimization objectives were created to produce different trade-offs using the single KBP model predictions: one prioritizing target coverage and a second prioritizing lung sparing (LS) while allowing an acceptable variation in target coverage. Three institutions submitted a high volume of clinical plans to RTOG 0617 and provided data on 25 patients, which were replanned using both sets of optimization objectives. Model-generated, dose-volume histogram predictions were used to identify patients who exceeded the lung clinical target volume (CTV) V20Gy >37% and would benefit from the LS objectives. Overall plan quality differences between KBP-generated plans and clinical plans were evaluated at RTOG 0617-defined dosimetric endpoints. RESULTS Target coverage and organ at risk sparing was significantly improved for most KBP-generated plans compared with those from clinical trial data. The KBP model using prioritized target coverage objectives reduced heart Dmean and V40Gy by 2.1 Gy and 5.2%, respectively. Similarly, using LS objectives reduced the lung CTV Dmean and V20Gy by 2.0 Gy and 2.9%, respectively. The KBP predictions correctly identified all patients with lung CTV V20Gy > 37% (5 of 25 patients) and significantly reduced the dose to the lung CTV by applying the LS optimization objectives. CONCLUSIONS A single-institution KBP model can be applied as a QC tool for multi-institutional clinical trials to improve overall plan quality and provide decision-support to determine the need for anatomy-based dosimetric trade-offs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James A Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
| | - Sarah Holler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Clifford G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Puneeth Iyengar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Kristin A Higgins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Lindsey A Olsen
- University of Colorado Health System, Colorado Springs, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Henke LE, Olsen JR, Contreras JA, Curcuru A, DeWees TA, Green OL, Michalski J, Mutic S, Roach MC, Bradley JD, Parikh PJ, Kashani R, Robinson CG. Stereotactic MR-Guided Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Ultracentral Thorax Malignancies: Results of a Phase 1 Trial. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 4:201-209. [PMID: 30706029 PMCID: PMC6349650 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment for oligometastatic or unresectable primary malignancies, although target proximity to organs at risk (OARs) within the ultracentral thorax (UCT) limits safe delivery of an ablative dose. Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)–guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic ratio using reoptimization to account for daily variation in target and OAR anatomy. This study assessed the feasibility of UCT SMART and characterized dosimetric and clinical outcomes in patients treated for UCT lesions on a prospective phase 1 trial. Methods and Materials Five patients with oligometastatic (n = 4) or unresectable primary (n = 1) UCT malignancies underwent SMART. Initial plans prescribed 50 Gy in 5 fractions with goal 95% planning target volume (PTV) coverage by 95% of prescription, subject to strict OAR constraints. Daily real-time online adaptive plans were created as needed to preserve hard OAR constraints, escalate PTV dose, or both, based on daily setup MR image set anatomy. Treatment times, patient outcomes, and dosimetric comparisons were prospectively recorded. Results All initial and daily adaptive plans met strict OAR constraints based on simulation and daily setup MR imaging anatomy, respectively. Four of the 5 patients received ≥1 adapted fraction. Ten of the 25 total delivered fractions were adapted. A total of 30% of plan adaptations were performed to improve PTV coverage; 70% were for reversal of ≥1 OAR violation. Local control by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors was 100% at 3 and 6 months. No grade ≥3 acute (within 6 months of radiation completion) treatment-related toxicities were identified. Conclusions SMART may allow PTV coverage improvement and/or OAR sparing compared with nonadaptive SBRT and may widen the therapeutic index of UCT SBRT. In this small prospective cohort, we found that SMART was clinically deliverable to 100% of patients, although treatment delivery times surpassed our predefined, timing-based feasibility endpoint. This technique is well tolerated, offering excellent local control with no identified acute grade ≥3 toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E. Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeffrey R. Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jessika A. Contreras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Austen Curcuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Olga L. Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael C. Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeffrey D. Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Parag J. Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Rojano Kashani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Clifford G. Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Campus Box 8224, 4921 Parkview Place, Floor LL, St Louis, MO 63110.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
DeWees TA, Nikitas J, Rehman S, Bradley JD, Robinson CG, Roach MC. Defining Optimal Comorbidity Measures for Patients With Early-Stage Non-small cell lung cancer Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2018; 9:e83-e89. [PMID: 30244094 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Revised: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comparison of overall survival (OS) between stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and other treatments for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer is confounded by differences in age, performance status, and medical comorbidity. We sought to define the most robust measurement for this population among 5 indices: age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and age-adjusted CCI (CCIa). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 548 patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with SBRT were analyzed. Patients were divided into high- and low-risk groups for OS for each index using the log-rank test. Continuous and dichotomized models were compared via Akaike information criterion and the Vuong test. Multivariate Cox regression modeling was used with demographic information to determine the independent prognostic value of the continuous and dichotomized versions of the indices. The best was used to stratify the patients into as many significantly different cohorts as possible. RESULTS Optimal cut-points between high-risk and low-risk OS groups for age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27, CCI, and CCIa were ≥75 years, ≥1, ≥3, ≥3, and ≥6 with hazard ratios for death of 1.23 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.50), 1.66 (1.28-2.15), 1.37 (1.12-1.67), 1.43 (1.17-1.76), and 1.47 (1.20-1.80), respectively. Dichotomizing did not result in a significant loss of prognostic power. Although there was no significant difference in prognostic power among the indices, CCIa best predicted OS. CCIa divided the patients into 3 cohorts with median OS of 42 months, 33 months, and 23 months for scores of ≤5, 6 to 7, and ≥8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CCIa was the best indicator of OS in every model employed with no loss of prognostic power with dichotomization. Dichotomization of CCIa (≥6) could be implemented in future comparisons of SBRT with OS. No cohort could be identified with a median survival of less than a year, for which treatment could be deemed futile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Todd A DeWees
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - John Nikitas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Sana Rehman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Summa Akron City Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Cliff G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael C Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Floberg JM, DeWees TA, Chin RI, Garsa AA, Dehdashti F, Nussenbaum B, Oppelt PJ, Adkins DR, Gay HA, Thorstad WL. Pretreatment metabolic tumor volume as a prognostic factor in HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancer in the context of AJCC 8th edition staging. Head Neck 2018; 40:2280-2287. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.25337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John M. Floberg
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology; St Louis MO
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Mayo Clinic, Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics Scottsdale; AZ
| | - Re-I Chin
- St Louis University School of Medicine; St Louis MO
| | - Adam A. Garsa
- Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Department of Radiation Oncology; Los Angeles CA
| | - Farrokh Dehdashti
- Washington University School of Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Division of Nuclear Medicine; St Louis MO
| | | | - Peter J. Oppelt
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology; St Louis MO
| | - Douglas R. Adkins
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology; St Louis MO
| | - Hiram A. Gay
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology; St Louis MO
| | - Wade L. Thorstad
- Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology; St Louis MO
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Henke LE, Kashani R, Hilliard J, DeWees TA, Curcuru A, Przybysz D, Green O, Robinson CG, Bradley JD. In Silico Trial of MR-Guided Midtreatment Adaptive Planning for Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Centrally Located Thoracic Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:987-995. [PMID: 29953910 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Revised: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hypofractionated (>5 fraction) stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) may allow for ablative biologically equivalent dose to tumors with a lower risk of organ-at-risk (OAR) toxicity in central thoracic tumors. Adaptive planning may further improve OAR sparing while maintaining planning target volume (PTV) coverage. We hypothesized that midtreatment adaptive replanning would offer dosimetric advantages during HSRT for central thorax malignancies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twelve patients with central thorax tumors received HSRT using MRI-guided radiation therapy. Clinically delivered regimens were 60 Gy in 12 fractions or 62.5 Gy in 10 fractions, with low-field magnetic resonance (0.35 T) volumetric setup imaging acquired at each fraction. Daily gross tumor volume (GTV) and OARs were retrospectively redefined on fraction 1, 6, and 10 MRIs, and GTV response was recorded. Simulated initial plans prescribed a dose of 60 Gy in 12 fractions based on fraction 1 MRI. Midtreatment adaptive plans were created based on fraction 6 anatomy-of-the-day. All plans were created using an isotoxicity approach with a goal of 95% PTV coverage, subject to hard OAR constraints, to represent clinically ideal OAR sparing. Plans were then compared for projected OAR sparing and PTV coverage. RESULTS Patients demonstrated significant on-treatment MRI-defined GTV reduction (median 41.8%; range 16.7%-65.7%). At fraction 6, median reduction was 26.7%. All initial plans met OAR constraints. Initial plan application to fraction 6 and fraction 10 anatomy resulted in 8 OAR violations (5 of 13 patients) and 10 OAR violations (6 of 13 patients). All fraction 6 violations persisted at fraction 10. Midpoint adaptive planning reversed 100% of midpoint OAR violations and tended to reduce the magnitude of OAR violations incurred at fraction 10. In 40% of fractions (2 of 5) in which OAR violation resulted from initial plan application to fraction 6 anatomy, PTV coverage was increased concomitant with violation reversal. CONCLUSIONS Midtreatment adaptive planning based on tumor response may be dosimetrically advantageous for sparing of surrounding critical structures in HSRT for central thorax malignancies and could be applied using either an online or offline paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren E Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Rojano Kashani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jessica Hilliard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Austen Curcuru
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Daniel Przybysz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Olga Green
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Clifford G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jeffrey D Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Floberg JM, Fowler KJ, Fuser D, DeWees TA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Wahl RL, Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW. Spatial relationship of 2-deoxy-2-[ 18F]-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion imaging metrics in cervical cancer. EJNMMI Res 2018; 8:52. [PMID: 29904822 PMCID: PMC6003894 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0403-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study investigated the spatial relationship of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography ([18F]FDG-PET) standardized uptake values (SUVs) and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) derived from magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion imaging on a voxel level using simultaneously acquired PET/MR data. We performed an institutional retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed cervical cancer who received a pre-treatment simultaneously acquired [18F]FDG-PET/MR. Voxel SUV and ADC values, and global tumor metrics including maximum SUV (SUVmax), mean ADC (ADCmean), and mean tumor-to-muscle ADC ratio (ADCT/M) were compared. The impacts of histology, grade, and tumor volume on the voxel SUV to ADC relationship were also evaluated. The potential prognostic value of the voxel SUV/ADC relationship was evaluated in an exploratory analysis using Kaplan-Meier/log-rank and univariate Cox analysis. Results Seventeen patients with PET/MR scans were identified. There was a significant inverse correlation between SUVmax and ADCmean, and SUVmax and ADCT/M. In the voxelwise analysis, squamous cell carcinomas (SCCAs) and poorly differentiated tumors showed a consistent significant inverse correlation between voxel SUV and ADC values; adenocarcinomas (AdenoCAs) and well/moderately differentiated tumors did not. The strength of the voxel SUV/ADC correlation varied with metabolic tumor volume (MTV). On log-rank analysis, the correlation between voxel SUV/ADC values was prognostic of disease-free survival (DFS). Conclusions In this hypothesis-generating study, a consistent inverse correlation between voxel SUV and ADC values was seen in SCCAs and poorly differentiated tumors. On univariate statistical analysis, correlation between voxel SUV and ADC values was prognostic for DFS. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0403-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Floberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8224, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dominique Fuser
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Todd A DeWees
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Farrokh Dehdashti
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Barry A Siegel
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Richard L Wahl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8224, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Julie K Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8224, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Perry W Grigsby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8224, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave, Box 8131, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.,Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|