Her2-neu score as a prognostic factor for outcome in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

Clinical characteristics, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and prognosis in HER2-low breast cancer: A comparison study with HER2-zero and HER2-positive disease

INTRODUCTION

HER2-low breast cancer is a gradually recognized and unexplored group of diseases. We aimed to investigate the clinical and prognosis features and to identify the role of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in this population.

METHODS

Consecutive primary breast cancer patients treated between January 2009 to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. HER2-low was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+, or 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative. sTILs were scored following the international guidelines. Clinicopathologic features and survival were compared according to HER2 and sTILs category.

RESULTS

A total of 973 breast cancer patients were enrolled, including 615 (63.2%) HER2-low patients. HER2-low patients shared more similarity with HER2-0 cases in clinicopathological features. sTILs in HER2-Low patients was comparable to HER2-0 patients (p = 0.064), both significantly lower than HER2-positive ones (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, tumors with sTILs ≥50% accounted for the least proportion of HER2-low cases (p < 0.001). HER2 status had no significant influence on recurrence-free survival (RFS, p = 0.901) in the whole population. However, in the estrogen receptor (ER)-negative subgroup, HER2-low was related to worse RFS (p = 0.009) and OS (p = 0.001) compared with HER2-positive ones. sTILs increment was an independent favorable prognostic factor in the whole (OS, p = 0.003; RFS, p = 0.005) and HER2-low population (OS, p = 0.007; RFS, p = 0.009) after adjusted to clinicopathological parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-low patients shared similar clinicopathological features with HER2-0 rather than HER2-positive cases and had relatively low sTILs. ER-negative/HER2-low patients had significantly inferior survival. sTILs increment was independently associated with favorable survival in the HER2-low group, suggesting a potential benefit from a novel treatment strategy.

Analysis of clinical features, genomic landscapes and survival outcomes in HER2-low breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody-drug conjugates prompt the identification of the HER2-low subtype. However, the biological significance of HER2-low expression in breast cancer is unclear.

METHODS

Clinical and genomic data of 579 metastatic breast cancer patients were reviewed from our next-generation sequencing (NGS) database and genomic analysis of early breast cancer patients from TCGA was also analyzed.

FINDINGS

First, the clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-low patients were profoundly influenced by HR status and no difference of prognosis was observed between HER2-low and HER2-zero patients when paired by HR status, but notably HER2-low patients showed similar metastatic patterns to HER2-positive patients in the HR-positive (HR+ ) subgroup, with more brain and initial lung metastases and more cases of de novo stage IV breast cancer than HER2-zero patients. Second, among patients with primary HER2-low or HER2-zero tumors, the discordance of HER2 status between primary and metastatic tumors was significant, with 48.4% of patients with HER2-zero primary tumors exhibiting HER2-low phenotype in metastatic tumors in the HR+ subgroup. Third, within HR+ and HR-negative subtypes, HER2-low and HER2-zero tumors showed no substantial differences in mutation alterations and copy number variations. Forth, germline BRCA2 mutations were observed only in HER2-low patients in our NGS database, especially in HR+ HER2-low tumors. Finally, three molecular subtypes based on genomic alterations in HER2-low breast cancer were identified, which provided novel insights into heterogeneity in HER2-low breast cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

After correcting for HR expression, only marginal differences in clinical and molecular phenotypes were determined between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancer. Therefore, HER2-low breast cancer is insufficient to be defined as a distinct molecular entity, but rather a heterogenous disease.

The Effect of HER2-Low Status on Pathological Complete Response and Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

This meta-analysis conducted a comprehensive analysis of research investigating the correlation between HER2 expression levels and treatment outcomes in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. We systematically searched major databases for studies published up to January 01, 2023. The data from various studies examined the relationship between HER2-zero and HER2-low tumors in terms of pathological complete response (pCR) rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) outcomes. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by the number of events were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method to analyze pCR. The hazard ratio and 95% CI were calculated using the inverse variance method for DFS and OS. In all comparisons, I² was 0% and no heterogeneity was detected. A total of 12 retrospective studies involving 4094 patients were included. Thirty-six percent of the patients were in the HER2-low group. All 12 studies were included in the pooled analysis for pCR, and there was no difference between HER2-zero and HER2-low (40% vs. 38%, respectively; pooled OR:1.01 95% CI 0.88-1.16; I²: 0%). Four studies were included in the pooled analysis for DFS and 3 in the OS analysis. DFS and OS were significantly better in the HER2-low group (pooled hazard ratio: 0.67 for DFS, 0.64 for OS). There was no difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero in terms of pCR in early-stage TNBC. However, HER2-low was found to be associated with prolonged DFS and OS. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023391002.

Survival differences between HER2-0 and HER2-low-expressing breast cancer - A meta-analysis of early breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

HER2-low (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) breast cancer takes up 40-50% in all breast cancer subtypes. The survival difference between HER2-low and HER2-zero breast cancers remain uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare survival outcome of the two subtypes and to explore the impact of hormone receptor status.

METHODS

A comprehensive medical literature search was performed by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Libraries up to August 2022. We included observational studies reporting hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of individual studies were pooled by random-effects models using Stata 16.0. Seventeen articles with a total of 78984 breast cancer patients were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We observed a statistically significant association between low HER2 expression and better breast cancer survival outcomes (OS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.90; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.75, 0.91). In a subgroup analysis, we found that HER2-low patients had better survival outcomes relative to hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients (OS: HR: 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.93; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.85, 0.96). Similarly, in triple-negative breast cancer patients, we also observed a positive association between HER2 low expression and better survival (OS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.71, 0.98; DFS/RFS: HR: 0.85; 95% confidence interval: 0.74, 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that HER2-low breast cancer had better survival outcomes compared to HER2 negative breast cancer in patients with early stage breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status.

REGISTRATION

This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022335704) on June 10, 2022.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].

Comparison of HER2-zero and HER2-low in terms of clinicopathological factors and survival in early-stage breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic differences between HER2-zero and HER2-low breast cancer (BC) remain unclear. Purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the differences between HER2-low and HER2-zero in terms of clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes in early-stage BC.

METHODS

We searched major databases and congress proceedings until November 1, 2022 to identify studies comparing HER2-zero and HER2-low in early-stage BC. HER2-zero immunohistochemically (IHC) was defined as score 0, while HER2-low was defined as IHC 1+ or 2+/in situ hybridization negative.

RESULT

A total of 23 retrospective studies involving 636,535 patients were included. HER2-low rate was 67.5% in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive group, while this rate was 48.6% in the HR-negative group. In the analysis of clinicopathological factors by HR status, the proportion of premenopausal patients within the HR-positive group was greater in the HER2-zero arm (66.5% vs 61.8%), whereas grade 3 tumors (74.2% vs 71.5%), patients younger than 50 years of age (47.3% vs 39.6%), and T3-T4 tumors (7.7% vs 6.3%) within the HR-negative group was higher in the HER2-zero arm. In both the HR-positive and HR-negative groups, the HER2-low arm showed significantly improved results for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). The hazard ratios for DFS and OS in the HR-positive group were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.78-0.96), respectively. In the HR-negative group, the hazard ratios for DFS and OS were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-0.97) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.89), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In early-stage BC, HER2-low is associated with better DFS and OS compared to HER2-zero, regardless of HR status.

Prognostic effect of low-level HER2 expression in patients with clinically negative HER2 status

PURPOSE

Assessment of HER2 overexpression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) for the detection of HER2 amplifications is standard to identify patients for established HER2-directed treatments. Patients with lower HER2 expression levels have recently also become candidates for novel therapies targeting HER2. This study aimed to assess tumour and patient characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC), relative to low HER2 expression levels.

METHODS

PRAEGNANT is a prospective aBC registry (NCT02338167), focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis includes patients with conventionally HER2-negative aBC. Clinical outcome was compared in the groups with no (IHC score 0) or with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH negative).

RESULTS

Low HER2 expression levels in triple-negative aBC patients did not influence progression-free survival. Overall survival appeared poorer in patients with IHC 2+ compared with patients with no HER2 expression in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.1.12-4.47). However, this effect was not maintained in the adjusted analysis. In HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive patients, low HER2 expression appeared to have no effect on prognosis, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We could not demonstrate that HER2 expression at a low level and assessed in clinical routine can differentiate patients into prognostic groups. However, the prevalence of patients with a low expression makes this population interesting for clinical trials with potentially active treatments using HER2 as a target.

The Effects of Low HER2/neu Expression on the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive type of breast cancer (BC), and its diagnosis is associated with negative expression of hormone receptors and HER2/neu. It consists of 10-20% of all BCs diagnosed.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This study focuses on three groups with different pathology: group one showed complete triple-negative HER2 expression with IHC of BC; groups two and three included patients with ER-, PR-, and HER21+, and ER-, PR-, and HER22+ with a negative FISH test. These three groups were compared from the point of prognosis, which consisted of tumor size, patients' age, lymphatic, vascular and perineural invasion, organ metastasis, number of lymph nodes involvement, and the survival rate.

RESULTS

A total of 459 TNBC patients were enrolled, of which 268 were placed in the HER20 group, 146 in the HER21+ group, and 45 in the HER22+ group. Distant metastasis and recurrence rate were more common in HER20 patients, but bone metastasis was more common in patients with low HER2 expression. All patients with HER20 had a smaller tumor size at the time of BC diagnosis in comparison to patients in the low HER2 expression group. Patients with HER22+ had less lymphatic and vascular invasion as well as axillary lymph nodes involvement, but larger tumor size at presentation, resulting in a lower rate of recurrence and higher overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The findings revealed that patients with HER22+ had better outcome in comparison to the patients with HER20 and HER21+. Furthermore, the results showed that many patients with HER22+ expression were not basal-like and had good prognosis amongst TNBC patients.

Is vimentin a potential prognostic factor for patients with triple-negative breast cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic potential of vimentin, p53, EGFR, CK5/6, CK 14, and CK 17 in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Tumor specimens of 60 patients with histologically confirmed TNBC were retrospectively analyzed. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of the tumor tissue were used to prepare tissue microarrays (TMAs). After immune-histochemical staining, protein expression of vimentin, p53, EGFR, CK5/6, CK 14, and CK 17 was determined and the immunoreactive score (IRS) was calculated. The protein expression was correlated to overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Ninety percent of patients suffered from an invasive ductal carcinoma T1 or T2, 66.7% were N0, and 70% had a G3 tumor with Ki67 of > 14%. Vimentin expression was found in 28/60 patients (46.7%), p53 expression in 30/60 patients (50%), and EGFR expression in 3/60 patients (5%). CK5/6, CK14, and CK17 expression was found in 60.0%, 63.3%, and 66.7%, respectively. Vimentin expression vs no expression was associated with significantly higher mean Ki67 values (52.5% vs. 31.1%; p = 0.0013) and significantly higher p53 expression (67.9% vs. 34.4%; p = 0.0097). No significant association between vimentin expression and OS (p = 0.7710) or DFS (p = 0.5558) was found during a mean follow-up of 92 months.

CONCLUSION

None of the six proteins proved to be suitable prognostic factors for OS and DSF in patients with TNBC.

Clinical and prognostic profile of Her2neu positive (non-luminal) intrinsic breast cancer subtype: comparison with Her2neu positive luminal breast cancers

Objective

Her2neu receptor is proto-oncogene which can be over-expressed in both luminal and non-luminal breast cancers. In the present study, we aimed to compare the prognostic and predictive factors like tumor grade, T-stage, N-stage and ki67 index in Her2neu intrinsic breast cancer subtype with Her2neu over-expressed luminal breast cancers.

Results

801 (41%) cases were Her2neu positive; out of which, 418 cases (52.2%) showed ER positivity and thus were classified as Her2neu positive luminal cancers whereas 383 cases (47.8%) were ER and PR negative and therefore were labeled as intrinsic Her2neu subtype (non-luminal). Her2neu positive (non-luminal) cancers were significantly associated with higher grades and Ki67 proliferative index compared to Her2neu positive luminal cancers. On the other no significant association was noted in T-stage and N-stage. We found a high frequency of her2neu positivity in our studied population of breast cancer. Moreover, association of her2neu positive (non-luminal) breast cancers with higher grade and ki67 index indicates a predictive value of ER/PR positivity in her2neu positive breast cancers. On the other hand, lack of association with respect to T and N stage, signifies no prognostic benefit of ER/PR in her2neu positive breast cancers.

Triple negative breast cancer: shedding light onto the role of pi3k/akt/mtor pathway

Breast cancer is one of the most widespread carcinoma and one of the main causes of cancer-related death worldwide, especially in women aged between 35 and 75 years. Among the different subtypes, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by the total absence of the estrogen-receptor (ER) and progesteron-receptor (PR) expression as well as the lack of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression or gene amplification. These biological characteristics confer to TNBC a higher aggressiveness and relapse risk along with poorer prognosis compared to other subtypes. Indeed, 5-years survival rate is still low and almost all patients die, despite any adjuvant treatment which at moment represents the heading pharmacological approach. To date, several clinical trials have been designed to investigate the potential role of some molecular markers, such as VEGF, EGFR, Src and mTOR, for targeted treatments in TNBC. In fact, many inhibitors of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, frequently de-regulated in TNBC, are acquiring a growing interest and several inhibitors are in preclinical development or already in early phase clinical trials. In this Review, we investigated the role of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in TNBC patients, by summarizing the molecular features that led to the distinction of different histotypes of TNBC. Furthermore, we provided an overview of the inhibition mechanisms of the mTOR and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, highlighting the importance of integrating biological and clinical data for the development of mTOR inhibitors in order to implement targeted therapies for TNBC patients.