1
|
Klafke N, Bossert J, Kröger B, Neuberger P, Heyder U, Layer M, Winkler M, Idler C, Kaschdailewitsch E, Heine R, John H, Zielke T, Schmeling B, Joy S, Mertens I, Babadag-Savas B, Kohler S, Mahler C, Witt CM, Steinmann D, Voiss P, Stolz R. Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) with Non-Pharmacological Interventions: Clinical Recommendations from a Systematic Scoping Review and an Expert Consensus Process. Med Sci (Basel) 2023; 11:medsci11010015. [PMID: 36810482 PMCID: PMC9944490 DOI: 10.3390/medsci11010015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Most individuals affected by cancer who are treated with certain chemotherapies suffer of CIPN. Therefore, there is a high patient and provider interest in complementary non-pharmacological therapies, but its evidence base has not yet been clearly pointed out in the context of CIPN. Methods: The results of a scoping review overviewing the published clinical evidence on the application of complementary therapies for improving the complex CIPN symptomatology are synthesized with the recommendations of an expert consensus process aiming to draw attention to supportive strategies for CIPN. The scoping review, registered at PROSPERO 2020 (CRD 42020165851), followed the PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidelines. Relevant studies published in Pubmed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PEDro, Cochrane CENTRAL, and CINAHL between 2000 and 2021 were included. CASP was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies. Results: Seventy-five studies with mixed study quality met the inclusion criteria. Manipulative therapies (including massage, reflexology, therapeutic touch), rhythmical embrocations, movement and mind-body therapies, acupuncture/acupressure, and TENS/Scrambler therapy were the most frequently analyzed in research and may be effective treatment options for CIPN. The expert panel approved 17 supportive interventions, most of them were phytotherapeutic interventions including external applications and cryotherapy, hydrotherapy, and tactile stimulation. More than two-thirds of the consented interventions were rated with moderate to high perceived clinical effectiveness in therapeutic use. Conclusions: The evidence of both the review and the expert panel supports a variety of complementary procedures regarding the supportive treatment of CIPN; however, the application on patients should be individually weighed in each case. Based on this meta-synthesis, interprofessional healthcare teams may open up a dialogue with patients interested in non-pharmacological treatment options to tailor complementary counselling and treatments to their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadja Klafke
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Jasmin Bossert
- Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Birgit Kröger
- Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Petra Neuberger
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ute Heyder
- Women’s Clinic, Community Hospital Karlsruhe, 76133 Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Monika Layer
- Center for Integrative Medicine, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Marcela Winkler
- Department of Naturopathy and Integrative Medicine, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Christel Idler
- Department of Naturopathy and Integrative Medicine, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Elke Kaschdailewitsch
- Center for Integrative Oncology, Die Filderklinik, 70794 Filderstadt-Bonlanden, Germany
| | - Rolf Heine
- Anthroposophic Nursing Network in Germany, Academy for Nursing Professions at the Filderklinik, Die Filderklinik, 70794 Filderstadt-Bonlanden, Germany
| | - Heike John
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Tatjana Zielke
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Beeke Schmeling
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Sosamma Joy
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Isabel Mertens
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Burcu Babadag-Savas
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Sara Kohler
- Department of Health, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Cornelia Mahler
- Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health Sciences, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Claudia M. Witt
- Institute for Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, 8091 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Diana Steinmann
- Clinic for Radiation Therapy and Special Oncology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Petra Voiss
- Department of Internal and Integrative Medicine, Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Faculty of Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45136 Essen, Germany
| | - Regina Stolz
- Institute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shirzad M, Abbassian A. A new glance at the role of traditional medicines in treatment of cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:3455-3456. [PMID: 34160679 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03705-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this letter, the authors noticed the previously published article entitled "How to transfer traditional knowledge about medicinal herbs? or TCM plants: a black box for modern oncologists" by Büntzel et al. The article mentioned traditional Persian Medicine (PM) as the second most published item in the field of medicine for the treatment of oral mucositis and polyneuropathy in cancer patients. We performed a second attempt to find more clinical trials on herbal medications using Iranian Medicine (IM), Traditional Iranian Medicine (TIM), or Iranian Traditional Medicine (ITM) as added terms to the keywords. In conclusion, we found four more clinical trials on herbal medicines in this field. This survey increases the number of PM trials detected by Büntzel, J et al. to 19 investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meysam Shirzad
- Department of Traditional Medicine, School of Persian Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 27, Sarparast Ave., Taleqani St., Tehran, Iran.
| | - Alireza Abbassian
- Department of Traditional Medicine, School of Persian Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No. 27, Sarparast Ave., Taleqani St., Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tumor patients' fears and worries and perceived changes of specific attitudes, perceptions and behaviors due to the COVID-19 pandemic are still relevant. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2021; 147:1673-1683. [PMID: 33675401 PMCID: PMC7936591 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03573-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective During the COVID-19 pandemic, tumor patients not only perceived fears and worries but were experiencing also positive changes as the perception of nature and silence, moments of wondering awe, and more intense relationships. We intended to analyze whether these perceptions may differ between patients from waves 1 and 2 of the pandemic. Methods Cross-sectional study at two time periods (May to June, sample 1) and September to November 2020 (sample 2) with standardized questionnaires (i.e. WHO-5, MLQ, PCQ-12). Results Patients from sample 1 (n = 292) and sample 2 (n = 221) did not differ with respect to gender, age, partner or tumor status. Most are still “irritated by statements about danger and course of the infection” (58%) and are “worrying to be infected and to have complicated course of disease” (55%). Neither their well-being nor meaning in life nor fears and worries were significantly different. In sample 2 patients, Worrying reflections and loneliness scored significantly lower, while their Perception of nature and silence was lower in trend only; more intense relationships are still relevant. Moments of wondering awe and religious trust were perceived less often during wave 2. Particularly religious patients scored stronger for Perception of nature and silence and Worrying reflections and loneliness. Conclusion Oncologists/psychologist have to know that patients’ situation has not changed within the time of pandemic and that they still require information, close support and encouragement to rely on their resources to cope. Perceived changes are reflecting coping strategies that could be trained to increase patients’ resilience during further pandemic waves.
Collapse
|
4
|
["I better stay at home…"-health system decisions to support the use of routine healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2021; 64:277-284. [PMID: 33580268 PMCID: PMC7880208 DOI: 10.1007/s00103-021-03282-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund In der COVID-19-Pandemie ging die Versorgung nichtübertragbarer Erkrankungen zeitweise deutlich zurück, auch weil Menschen Angst vor einer Ansteckung hatten. Wir führen eine Bestandsaufnahme zur organisationalen Gesundheitskompetenz in der Regelversorgung nichtübertragbarer Erkrankungen in der ersten Welle der COVID-19-Pandemie durch und fragen: Inwiefern wurden Menschen mit gesundheitlichen Beschwerden dabei unterstützt, gesundheitskompetente Entscheidungen für oder gegen die Inanspruchnahme von Versorgungsleistungen zu treffen? Methodik Strukturierende Inhaltsanalyse der Internetpräsenzen der Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlich Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF; n = 179), der kassen(zahn)ärztlichen Vereinigungen (K(Z)Ven; n = 38), ausgewählter Krankenkassen (n = 21), ausgewählter Behandlungseinrichtungen (n = 25) und überregionaler Anbieter von Gesundheitsinformationen (n = 5) zu Informationen und Angeboten zum Thema. Ergebnisse Die geprüften Internetpräsenzen informieren weitgehend rund um COVID-19, aber nur selten darüber, wie man sich bei einer (vermuteten) anderen Erkrankung in Bezug auf die Inanspruchnahme von Versorgungsleistungen verhält. 2 Portale von Anbietern von Gesundheitsinformationen, eine Krankenkasse, aber keine der KVen bieten explizite Entscheidungshilfen an. KVen weisen öfter, aber nicht durchgängig auf die generelle Möglichkeit von Videosprechstunden hin. Diskussion Für die meisten Patient*innen gab es damit keine gezielten Informationen zu dem Thema. Angesichts der Fortdauer der COVID-19-Pandemie gilt es, vorhandene vertrauenswürdige, qualitativ hochwertige Informations- und Beratungskapazitäten auszubauen und ihre Bekanntheit zu erhöhen, um gesundheitskompetente Entscheidungen auch in der Pandemie zu ermöglichen.
Collapse
|