Results of a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating sequential high-dose cytosine arabinoside/mitoxantrone chemotherapy with or without granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors for newly diagnosed patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogeneous group of haematological diseases which are characterised by a uni- or multilineage dysplasia of haematological stem cells. Standard treatment is supportive care of the arising symptoms including red blood cell transfusions or the administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in the case of anaemia or the treatment with granulocyte (G-CSF) and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors (GM-CSF) in cases of neutropenia.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review is to assess the evidence for the treatment of patients with MDS with G-CSF and GM-CSF in addition to standard therapy in comparison to the same standard therapy or the same standard therapy and placebo.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (from 1950 to 3 December 2015) and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until 3 December 2015), as well as conference proceedings (American Society of Hematology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Hematology Association, European Society of Medical Oncology) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Two review authors independently screened search results.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs examining G-CSF or GM-CSF in addition to standard therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MDS.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used hazard ratios (HR) as effect measure for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression, and risk ratios for response rates, adverse events, antibiotic use and hospitalisation. Two independent review authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Investigators of two trials were contacted for subgroup information, however, no further data were provided. G-CSF and GM-CSF were analysed separately.

MAIN RESULTS

We screened a total of 566 records. Seven RCTs involving 486 patients were identified, but we could only meta-analyse the two evaluating GM-CSF. We judged the potential risk of bias of these trials as unclear, mostly due to missing information. All trials were randomised and open-label studies. However, three trials were published as abstracts only, therefore we were not able to assess the potential risk of bias for these trials in detail. Overall, data were not reported in a comparable way and patient-related outcomes like survival, time to progression to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) or the incidence of infections was reported in two trials only.Five RCTs (N = 337) assessed the efficacy of G-CSF in combination with standard therapy (supportive care, chemotherapy or erythropoietin). We were not able to perform meta-analyses for any of the pre-planned outcomes due to inconsistent and insufficient reporting of data. There is no evidence for a difference for overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44 to 1.47), progression-free survival (only P value provided), progression to AML, incidence of infections and number of red blood transfusions (average number of 12 red blood cell transfusions in each arm). We judged the quality of evidence for all these outcomes as very low, due to very high imprecision and potential publication bias, as three trials were published as abstracts only. Data about quality of life and serious adverse events were not reported in any of the included trials.Two RCTs (N = 149) evaluated GM-CSF in addition to standard therapy (chemotherapy). For mortality (two RCTs; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.26), we found no evidence for a difference (low-quality evidence). Data for progression-free survival and serious adverse events were not comparable across both studies, without evidence for a difference between both arms (low-quality evidence). For infections, red blood cell and platelet transfusions, we found no evidence for a difference, however, these outcomes were reported by one trial only (low-quality evidence). Time to progression to AML and quality of life were not reported at all.Moreover, we identified two cross-over trials, including 244 patients and evaluating GM-CSF versus placebo, without publishing results for each arm before crossing over. In addition, we identified two ongoing studies, one of which was discontinued due to withdrawal of pharmaceutical support, the other was terminated early, both without publishing results.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although we identified seven trials with a total number of 486 patients, and two unpublished, prematurely finished studies, this systematic review mainly shows that there is a substantial lack of data, which might inform the use of G-CSF and GM-CSF for the prevention of infections, prolonging of survival and improvement of quality of life. The impact on progression to AML remains unclear.

Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in 66 patients with myeloid or lymphoid neoplasms and recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with invasive fungal disease

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Adding granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) may improve the response to antifungal therapy in immunosuppressed patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD).

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 66 patients in whom GM-CSF was given during antifungal therapy.

RESULTS

Severe neutropenia (77%) and refractory/relapsed cancer (65%) were common in the group. Prior to GM-CSF therapy, 15% of patients received high-dose corticosteroids for a median of 30 ± 16 days [median cumulative dose (c.d.) 1,184 ± 1,019 mg], and 9 received steroids during GM-CSF therapy for a median of 16 ± 12 days (median c.d. 230 ± 1,314 mg). Mild toxic effects were noted in 9% of patients; there were no cases of cardiopulmonary toxicity. All-cause deaths were observed in 68% of patients and 48% died of progressive IFD. High-dose corticosteroids prior to GM-CSF (OR 24; 95% CI 2.21-264.9; p ≤ 0.009), GM-CSF started in the intensive care unit (OR 10; 95% CI 1.66-63.8; p ≤ 0.01), concurrent granulocyte transfusions (OR 5; 95% CI 1.27-16.8; p ≤ 0.02) and proven/probable IFD (OR 4; 95% CI 1-16.2; p ≤ 0.05) predicted antifungal treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

GM-CSF adjuvant therapy was tolerated without serous toxicity and antifungal treatment failure remained a challenge in patients treated with high-dose systemic corticosteroids.

The role of cytotoxic therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes: an evidence-based review

Clinical research examining the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in the therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in adults is presented and critically evaluated in this systematic evidence-based review. Specific criteria were used for searching the published literature and for grading the quality and strength of the evidence and the strength of the treatment recommendations. Treatment recommendations based on the evidence are presented in Table 3, and were reached unanimously by a panel of MDS experts. The identified priority areas of needed future research in MDS include: (1) the benefit of using alternative donor sources (eg, cord blood; haploidentical family donors) for patients without matched sibling or unrelated donors; (2) the role and appropriate timing of allogeneic SCT in combination with hypomethylating and immunomodulatory treatment regimens; (3) randomized trials comparing the safety and efficacy of various novel agents for treating MDS; and (4) the influence of the various MDS treatment modalities on patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes.

Management of patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) include patients in the Intermediate-2 and high-risk categories of the International Prognostic Scoring System, as well as patients with MDS secondary to radiation or chemical exposure. Ideally, the goal of therapy is to alter the natural history of disease in these patients to achieve cure or durable remission. High-intensity chemotherapy can achieve moderate rates of complete remission, however, durability of remission and overall survival tend to be short. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) offers the possibility of cure, with long-term disease-free survival inversely related to age. Patients who are elderly or have poor functional status are candidates for reduced intensity HSCT, although this is still an experimental modality. Azacitidine is a hypomethylating agent that is a reasonable option for many patients ineligible for high-intensity therapies. Other therapies, such as immunomodulatory agents, arsenic trioxide, and farnesyl transferase inhibitors have thus far shown limited usefulness in higher risk MDS. This paper reviews the various therapeutic options for higher risk MDS, providing rationale for specific management approaches for these patients.

Fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, liposomal daunorubicin, and dexamethasone plus rituximab and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine plus rituximab and GM-CSF in patients with Richter syndrome or fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia

BACKGROUND

Therapy for patients with Richter syndrome (RS) or fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is unsatisfactory. A Phase II study was conducted to evaluate an alternating combination cytotoxic regimen given with rituximab and granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in these patients.

METHODS

Fludarabine-refractory CLL was defined as failure to respond to most recent prior fludarabine-containing regimen. Patients received up to six cycles of fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, liposomal daunorubicin, and dexamethasone (hyper-CVXD) plus rituximab and GM-CSF alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine plus rituximab and GM-CSF. Response, toxicity, and survival data were compared with data from prior therapy with hyper-CVXD alone in this patient group.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with RS (n = 30 patients) or refractory CLL (n = 19 patients) were treated on study. Nine patients (18%) achieved a complete remission, and 11 patients achieved a partial remission (22%), for an overall objective response (OR) rate of 41%. With a median follow-up of 7.5 months and a maximum follow-up of 15.2 months, the 12-month failure free survival (FFS) rate was 27%, and the overall survival (OS) rate was 39%. Nine patients (18%) died during the first cycle of therapy, and two patients (4%) died during the second cycle. There were no significant differences between the rates of OR, OS, and FFS in the current study and those obtained with hyper-CVXD alone on a prior study.

CONCLUSIONS

The study regimen had activity and significant toxicity in patients with RS or fludarabine-refractory CLL. It was not clearly better compared with hyper-CVXD alone in this patient population.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) priming with successive concomitant low-dose Ara-C for elderly patients with secondary/refractory acute myeloid leukemia or advanced myelodysplastic syndrome

Patients with advanced MDS and secondary AML respond poorly to chemotherapy. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) can stimulate proliferation of leukemic blasts and sensitize these cells to the cytotoxic effects of S-phase-specific drugs. This is the first report of safety and efficacy of GM-CSF prior to and during cytarabine in a low-dose, intermittent regimen for elderly patients with poor risk acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Twenty patients, age 68 to 86 years, each received 250 microg/m2 of GM-CSF (Sargramostatin; Immunex, Seattle, WA, USA) subcutaneously (s.c.) or intravenously (i.v.) for 3 days followed by GM-CSF at the same dose and cytarabine 100 mg/m2 i.v. for 3 days. GM-CSF and cytarabine were both administered for 3 days during weeks 2 and 3 followed by a 3-week rest period. Rates of CR and PR were 20% and 40%, respectively. These included clinically significant resolution of cytopenias and transfusion requirements. Many of the responding patients had been heavily pretreated prior to enrollment. One- and 2-year survival estimates are 44% and 19%, respectively. Myelosuppression was the most significant toxicity. Our findings suggest that this novel combination of GM-CSF with sequential and concomitant low-dose cytarabine can benefit patients with poor risk myeloid malignancies.

Myelodysplasia

The epidemiology of myelodysplasia, or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), is in evolution. As populations are aging and therapies for cancer are improving, the frequency of this disease is increasing. Recent population surveys and case-control studies are reviewed. Knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis and pathophysiology of MDS is advancing at a remarkable pace and new information on molecular events is presented. The treatment of MDS is complex and highly individualized. Although many patients are older and may have significant co-morbid disease or poor performance status, there are curative options with allogeneic transplantation for selected patients. The recent transplant publications are reviewed. Other investigative treatment approaches, including the use of new chemotherapy agents, growth factor combinations, and antithymocyte globulin appear promising and are reviewed.