Novel microdeletion syndromes detected by chromosome microarrays

Variants in KMT2A in Three Individuals with Previous Suspicion of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

The condition known as 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (MIM #188400) is a rare disease with a highly variable clinical presentation including more than 180 features; specific guidelines for screening individuals have been used to support clinical suspicion before confirmatory tests by Brazil's Craniofacial Project. Of the 2568 patients listed in the Brazilian Database on Craniofacial Anomalies, 43 individuals negative for the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome were further investigated through whole-exome sequencing. Three patients (6.7%) presented with heterozygous pathogenic variants in the KMT2A gene, including a novel variant (c.6158+1del) and two that had been previously reported (c.173dup and c.3241C>T); reverse phenotyping concluded that all three patients presented features of Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome, such as neurodevelopmental disorders and dysmorphic facial features (n = 3), hyperactivity and anxiety (n = 2), thick eyebrows and lower-limb hypertrichosis (n = 2), congenital heart disease (n = 1), short stature (n = 1), and velopharyngeal insufficiency (n = 2). Overlapping features between 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and Wiedemann-Steiner syndrome comprised neuropsychiatric disorders and dysmorphic characteristics involving the eyes and nose region; velopharyngeal insufficiency was seen in two patients and is an unreported finding in WDSTS. Therefore, we suggest that both conditions should be included in each other's differential diagnoses.

A New Case of Rare Microdeletion 10q22.3q23 along with Mosaic Klinefelter Syndrome Associated with Facial Dysmorphic Finding, Atrial Ventricular Septal Defect, and Motor Retardation

The chromosome 10q22.3q23.2 deletion syndrome is characterized by craniofacial dysmorphic features, developmental delay, congenital heart defect, and hand/foot abnormalities. In this study, we report a patient carrying a microdeletion of 7.5 Mb at 10q22.3q23.2 and in addition a mosaicism mos 47,XXY[47]/46,XY[23].This male patient was 3 years and 3 months years old at the time of genetic evaluation. Atrial ventricular septal defect (AVSD), mild hypotonia, torticollis, and left-sided club foot were noticed after birth. The boy had surgical correction of the AVSD and the club foot. His dysmorphic features were frontal bossing, overfolded ear helix, hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, broad base of nose, flat nasal bridge, full cheeks, thick lips, micrognathia, and joint hyperextensibility. His speech/language development was delayed. Klinefelter syndrome is one of the most common congenital chromosomal abnormalities, but usually it is detected in puberty or in adulthood when reproductive failure occurs. Deletions in the 10q22.3q23.2 region are rare, and previously only a few numbers of cases were described with this microdeletion, but none of them together with Klinefelter syndrome and it could be associated with our case clinical features. The new case described will improve understanding the phenotype associated with 10q22.3q23.2 microdeletions. By presenting this case, we aimed to improve the understanding of the phenotype caused by the rare 10q22.3q23.2 deletion and to show the rare coexistence of this deletion with Klinefelter syndrome.

Reduced anogenital distance, hematuria and left renal hypoplasia in a patient with 13q33.1-34 deletion: case report and literature review

Background

13q33–q34 microdeletions are rare chromosomal aberrations associated with a high risk of developmental disability, facial dysmorphism, cardiac defects and other malformation of organs. It is necessary to collect and report evidence of this rare chromosome mutation to improve the prognosis of this rare disease.

Case presentation

We report a patient harboring an 11.56 Mb microdeletion at 13q33.1–34 region, which contains about 30 OMIM genes. Besides the common clinical manifestations such as facial dysmorphism, developmental delay, intellectual disability, epilepsy, and congenital heart disease, she also suffered from a reduced anogenital distance, hematuria and left renal hypoplasia. Most related cases were characterized by facial deformity and heart defects, but there were few reports on renal malformation, especially regarding renal hypoplasia with hematuria.

Conclusion

We have reported a patient suffering from a reduced anogenital distance, hematuria and left renal hypoplasia. A de novo 11.56 Mb deletion ranging from 13q33.1 to 13q34 (Chr13:103542220–115,106,996) was found by SNP-array analysis. It might be the first time for hematuria and renal hypoplasia to be reported as symptoms of 13q33-q34 deletion syndrome Neurodevelopmental disability, heart defects and urogenital/anorectal anomalies may be resulted from common or overlapping regions of deletion in chromosome bands 13q33.1-q34 and may share a common molecular mechanism.

A Private 16q24.2q24.3 Microduplication in a Boy with Intellectual Disability, Speech Delay and Mild Dysmorphic Features

No data on interstitial microduplications of the 16q24.2q24.3 chromosome region are available in the medical literature and remain extraordinarily rare in public databases. Here, we describe a boy with a de novo 16q24.2q24.3 microduplication at the Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP)-array analysis spanning ~2.2 Mb and encompassing 38 genes. The patient showed mild-to-moderate intellectual disability, speech delay and mild dysmorphic features. In DECIPHER, we found six individuals carrying a “pure” overlapping microduplication. Although available data are very limited, genomic and phenotype comparison of our and previously annotated patients suggested a potential clinical relevance for 16q24.2q24.3 microduplication with a variable and not (yet) recognizable phenotype predominantly affecting cognition. Comparing the cytogenomic data of available individuals allowed us to delineate the smallest region of overlap involving 14 genes. Accordingly, we propose ANKRD11, CDH15, and CTU2 as candidate genes for explaining the related neurodevelopmental manifestations shared by these patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a clinical and molecular comparison among patients with overlapping 16q24.2q24.3 microduplication has been done. This study broadens our knowledge of the phenotypic consequences of 16q24.2q24.3 microduplication, providing supporting evidence of an emerging syndrome.

Additive Diagnostic Yield of Homozygosity Regions Identified During Chromosomal microarray Testing in Children with Developmental Delay, Dysmorphic Features or Congenital Anomalies

Chromosomal microarray (CMA) has emerged as a robust tool for identifying microdeletions and microduplications, termed copy number variants (CNVs). Nevertheless, data regarding its utility in different patient populations with developmental delay (DD), dysmorphic features (DF) and congenital anomalies (CA), is a matter of dense debate. Although regions of homozygosity (ROH) are not diagnostic of a specific condition, they may have pathogenic implications. Certain CNVs and ROH have ethnically specific occurrences and frequencies. We aimed to determine whether CMA testing offers additional diagnostic information over classical cytogenetics for identifying genomic imbalances in a pediatric cohort with idiopathic DD, DF, or CA. One hundred sixty-nine patients were offered cytogenetics and CMA simultaneously for etiological diagnosis of DD (n = 67), DF (n = 52) and CA (n = 50). CMA could identify additional, clinically significant anomalies as compared with cytogenetics. CMA detected 61 CNVs [21 (34.4%) pathogenic CNVs, 37 (60.7%) variants of uncertain clinical significance and 3 (4.9%) benign CNVs] in 44 patients. CMA identified one or more ROH in 116/169 (68.6%) patients. When considering pathogenic CNVs and aneuploidies as positive findings, 9/169 (5.3%) received a genetic diagnosis from cytogenetics, while 25/169 (14.8%) could have a genetic diagnosis from CMA. The identification of ROH was clinically significant in two cases (2/169), thereby, adding 1.2% to the diagnostic yield of CMA (16% vs. 5.3%, p < 0.001). CMA uncovers additional genetic diagnoses over cytogenetics, thereby, offering a much higher diagnostic yield. Our findings convincingly demonstrate the additive diagnostic value of clinically significant ROH identified during CMA testing, highlighting the need for careful clinical interpretation of these ROH.

Chromosomal microarray analysis is superior in identifying cryptic aberrations in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia at diagnosis/relapse as a single assay

INTRODUCTION

Conventional cytogenetics (CC) is important in diagnosis, therapy, monitoring of post-transplant bone marrow, and prognosis assessment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, due to the nature of ALL, CC often encounters difficulties of complex karyotype, poor chromosome morphology, low mitotic index, or normal cells dividing only. In contrast, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) showed a specificity >99% and a sensitivity of 100% in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Here, we report our experience with CMA on adult ALL patients.

METHODS

Thirty-three bone marrow/blood samples from ALL patients (aged 18-79 years, median 44) at diagnosis/relapse, analyzed by CC and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), were recruited. Chromosomal microarray analysis results were compared with CC. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis, if available, was applied when there was a discrepancy.

RESULTS

Copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity (CN-LOH) was found in 8 cases (24.2%). Only CN-LOH at 9p was recurrent (3 cases, 9.1%). Copy number alterations (CNAs) were detected in 6 of 9 cases (66.7%) with normal karyotypes, in 3 of 5 cases (60.0%) with sole "balanced" translocations, and in 18 of 19 cases (94.7%) with complex karyotypes. Common CNAs involved CDKN2A/2B (30.3%), IKZF1 (27.3%), PAX5 (9.1%), RB1 (9.1%), BTG1 (6.7%), and ETV6 (6.7%), which regulate cell cycle, B lymphopoiesis, or act as tumor suppressors in ALL. Copy number alteration detection rate by CMA was 81.8% (27 of 33 cases) as compared to 57.6% (19 of 33 cases) by CC.

CONCLUSION

Incorporation of CMA as a routine clinical test at the time of diagnosis/relapse, in conjunction with CC and/or FISH, is highly recommended.

Phenotypic features of 1q41q42 microdeletion including WDR26 and FBXO28 are clinically recognizable: The first case from Japan

1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome has been established in 2007. Since then, more than 17 patients have been reported so far. The reported deletions showed random breakpoints and deletion regions are aligned as roof tiles. Patients with 1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome show intellectual disability, seizures, and distinctive features. Many genotype-phenotype correlation studies have been performed and some genes included in this region have been suggested as potential candidate genes. Recently, de novo variants in WDR26 and FBXO28 were identified in patients who showed consistent phenotypes with 1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome. Thus, both genes are now considered as the genes possibly responsible for 1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome. Here, the first case of a Japanese patient with a de novo 1q41q42 microdeletion is reported. Owing to the distinctive features, this syndrome would be clinically recognizable.

Extending the Phenotype and Identification of a Novel Candidate Gene for Immunodeficiency in 5q11 Microdeletion Syndrome

Array CGH has led to the delineation of innumerable microdeletion syndromes. We present a patient with a 7-Mb deletion at 5q11.2 with previously unreported features, such as immunodeficiency, asymmetry of hands and feet, joint laxity, and agenesis of corpus callosum. The clinical features of this patient are compared with 13 patients reported previously. A common critical region (CCR) of 1.4 Mb (54-55.4 Mb) is defined in all cases including the present one. Of the 14 genes present in CCR, IL6ST is proposed to be the candidate gene for immunodeficiency observed in some of these patients. IL6ST encodes gp130, a signal transduction protein for various interleukins and cytokines. It is involved in the generation of both T and B lymphocytes as well as the production of acute-phase reactants. Microdeletion 5q11.2 should be considered as a recognisable syndrome based on the common phenotype and the novel features described.

Multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification - A useful, fast and cost-effective method for identification of small supernumerary marker chromosome in children with developmental delay and congenital heart defect

Small supernumerary marker chromosome (sSMC) is a rare chromosomal abnormality and is detected in about 0.3% in cases with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) and/or developmental delay. Different techniques for investigation of cases with MCA and/or developmental delay are available ranging from karyotyping to molecular cytogenetic technique and ultimately multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Here we present a patient with multiple congenital anomalies for which classical cytogenetic technique was used as a first step in diagnosis and the results being confirmed by MLPA. The karyotype disclosed a sSMC considered to be a fragment of chromosome 22. The MLPA analysis using SALSA MLPA probemix P064-C2 Microdeletion Syndromes-1B confirmed the karyotype results, and according to the manufacturer’s recommendation we performed another confirmation analysis with MLPA probemix P311-B1 Congenital Heart Disease and MLPA probemix P250-B2 DiGeorge. We also suspected an Emanuel syndrome and performed another MLPA analysis with SALSA MLPA probemix P036-E3 Subtelomeres Mix 1 and probemix P070-B3 Subtelomeres Mix 2B for investigation of subtelomeric region that revealed a duplication of 11q25 region and the confirmation was performed using SALSA MLPA probemix P286-B2 Human Telomere-11.

In conclusion, we consider that MLPA is a valuable method for identification of sSMC in children with developmental delay and congenital anomalies. Genetic diagnosis using different molecular techniques, such as MLPA, for increasing accuracy in identification of chromosomal structural aberrations has an important role in clinical diagnosis and in genetic counselling and our case explain the importance of using a specific laboratory technique for each stage of diagnosis.

Strukturelle Chromosomenstörungen bei Intelligenzminderung

Strukturelle und numerische Chromosomenstörungen gehören zu den häufigen Ursachen der Intelligenzminderung und psychomotorischen Entwicklungsstörung. Die große Heterogenität der Intelligenzminderung spiegelt sich auch in der Vielfalt möglicher Aberrationstypen und ursächlicher Chromosomenregionen wider. Die konventionelle lichtmikroskopische Zytogenetik kann hierbei u. a. strukturelle Aberrationen mit Größen über ca. 5–10 Megabasenpaaren (Mb) auch in Form kleinerer Mosaike nachweisen und diese im Genom lokalisieren. Durch Fluoreszenz-in situ-Hybridisierung können bei klinischem Verdacht gezielt auch deutlich kleinere Aberrationen, z. B. Mikrodeletionen, detektiert werden. Chromosomale Mikroarrays (CMA) detektieren dank ihrer besseren Auflösung, die bis deutlich unter 0,1 Mb reichen kann, genomweit submikroskopische Mikrodeletionen und Mikroduplikationen, machen jedoch bei Duplikationen keine Aussage zu deren genomischer Lokalisation und können meist niedriggradige Mosaike unter 20 % kaum nachweisen. Zytogenetik und CMA ergänzen sich aufgrund ihrer unterschiedlichen Fähigkeiten und weisen einschließlich der Trisomie 21 jeweils in ungefähr 15 % der Patienten mit Intelligenzminderung ursächliche Chromosomenaberrationen nach. Sie stellen damit neben aktuellen Sequenzierungstechniken ein wichtiges Element der humangenetischen Ursachenabklärung bei Intelligenzminderung dar. Typische chromosomale Aberrationstypen werden beispielhaft besprochen und in das heutige Gesamtbild eingeordnet.

A Multicentric Brazilian Investigative Study of Copy Number Variations in Patients with Congenital Anomalies and Intellectual Disability

Genomic imbalances are the most common cause of congenital anomalies (CA) and intellectual disability (ID). The aims of this study were to identify copy number variations (CNVs) in 416 patients with CA and ID from 5 different genetics centers within 4 different states by using the Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) technique and to apply the chromosomal microarray (CMA) methodology in selected cases. The samples were analyzed by MLPA kits P064, P036, P070 and P250. Positive results were found in 97/416 (23.3%) patients. CMA was applied in 14 selected cases. In 6/14 (42.85%) patients, CMA detected other copy number variations not detected by the MLPA studies. Although CMA is indispensable for genotype refinement, the technique is still unfeasible in some countries as a routine analysis due to economic and technical limitations. In these cases, clinical evaluation followed by karyotyping and MLPA analysis is a helpful and affordable solution for diagnostic purposes.

Prematurity, ventricular septal defect and dysmorphisms are independent predictors of pathogenic copy number variants: a retrospective study on array-CGH results and phenotypical features of 293 children with neurodevelopmental disorders and/or multiple congenital anomalies

BACKGROUND

Since 2010, array-CGH (aCGH) has been the first-tier test in the diagnostic approach of children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD) or multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) of unknown origin. Its broad application led to the detection of numerous variants of uncertain clinical significance (VOUS). How to appropriately interpret aCGH results represents a challenge for the clinician.

METHOD

We present a retrospective study on 293 patients with age range 1 month - 29 years (median 7 years) with NDD and/or MCA and/or dysmorphisms, investigated through aCGH between 2005 and 2016. The aim of the study was to analyze clinical and molecular cytogenetic data in order to identify what elements could be useful to interpret unknown or poorly described aberrations. Comparison of phenotype and cytogenetic characteristics through univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

Copy number variations (CNVs) with a frequency < 1% were detected in 225 patients of the total sample, while 68 patients presented only variants with higher frequency (heterozygous deletions or amplification) and were considered to have negative aCGH. Proved pathogenic CNVs were detected in 70 patients (20.6%). Delayed psychomotor development, intellectual disability, intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), prematurity, congenital heart disease, cerebral malformations and dysmorphisms correlated to reported pathogenic CNVs. Prematurity, ventricular septal defect and dysmorphisms remained significant predictors of pathogenic CNVs in the multivariate logistic model whereas abnormal EEG and limb dysmorphisms were mainly detected in the group with likely pathogenic VOUS. A flow-chart regarding the care for patients with NDD and/or MCA and/or dysmorphisms and the interpretation of aCGH has been made on the basis of the data inferred from this study and literature.

CONCLUSION

Our work contributes to make the investigative process of CNVs more informative and suggests possible directions in aCGH interpretation and phenotype correlation.

4q21.2q21.3 Duplication: Molecular and Neuropsychological Aspects

During the last decades, a large amount of newly described microduplications and microdeletions associated with intellectual disability (ID) and related neuropsychiatric diseases have been discovered. However, due to natural limitations, a significant part of them has not been the focus of multidisciplinary approaches.

Here, we address previously undescribed chromosome 4q21.2q21.3 microduplication for gene prioritization, evaluation of cognitive abilities and estimation of genomic mechanisms for brain dysfunction by molecular cytogenetic (cytogenomic) and gene expression (meta-) analyses as well as for neuropsychological assessment. We showed that duplication at 4q21.2q21.3 is associated with moderate ID, cognitive deficits, developmental delay, language impairment, memory and attention problems, facial dysmorphisms, congenital heart defect and dentinogenesis imperfecta. Gene-expression meta-analysis prioritized the following genes: ENOPH1, AFF1, DSPP, SPARCL1, and SPP1. Furthermore, genotype/phenotype correlations allowed the attribution of each gene gain to each phenotypic feature.

Neuropsychological testing showed visual-perceptual and fine motor skill deficits, reduced attention span, deficits of the nominative function and problems in processing both visual and aural information. Finally, emerging approaches including molecular cytogenetic, bioinformatic (genome/epigenome meta-analysis) and neuropsychological methods are concluded to be required for comprehensive neurological, genetic and neuropsychological descriptions of new genomic rearrangements/diseases associated with ID.

16p11.2 transcription factor MAZ is a dosage-sensitive regulator of genitourinary development

Genitourinary (GU) birth defects are among the most common yet least studied congenital malformations. Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUTs) have high morbidity and mortality rates and account for ∼30% of structural birth defects. Copy number variation (CNV) mapping revealed that 16p11.2 is a hotspot for GU development. The only gene covered collectively by all of the mapped GU-patient CNVs was MYC-associated zinc finger transcription factor (MAZ), and MAZ CNV frequency is enriched in nonsyndromic GU-abnormal patients. Knockdown of MAZ in HEK293 cells results in differential expression of several WNT morphogens required for normal GU development, including Wnt11 and Wnt4. MAZ knockdown also prevents efficient transition into S phase, affects transcription of cell-cycle regulators, and abrogates growth of human embryonic kidney cells. Murine Maz is ubiquitously expressed, and a CRISPR-Cas9 mouse model of Maz deletion results in perinatal lethality with survival rates dependent on Maz copy number. Homozygous loss of Maz results in high penetrance of CAKUTs, and Maz is haploinsufficient for normal bladder development. MAZ, once thought to be a simple housekeeping gene, encodes a dosage-sensitive transcription factor that regulates urogenital development and contributes to both nonsyndromic congenital malformations of the GU tract as well as the 16p11.2 phenotype.

Clinical and molecular characterization of an emerging chromosome 22q13.31 microdeletion syndrome

Microdeletion of chromosome 22q13.31 is a very rare condition. Fourteen patients have been annotated in public databases but, to date, a clinical comparison has not been done and, consequently, a specific phenotype has not been delineated yet. We describe a patient showing neurodevelopmental disorders, dysmorphic features, and multiple congenital anomalies in which SNP array analysis revealed an interstitial 3.15 Mb de novo microdeletion in the 22q13.31 region encompassing 21 RefSeq genes and seven non-coding microRNAs. To perform an accurate phenotype characterization, clinical features observed in previously reported cases of 22q13.31 microdeletions were reviewed and compared to those observed in our patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a comparison between patients carrying overlapping 22q13.31 deletions has been done. This comparison allowed us to identify a distinct spectrum of clinical manifestations suggesting that patients with a de novo interstitial microdeletion involving 22q13.31 have an emerging syndrome characterized by developmental delay/intellectual disability, speech delay/language disorders, behavioral problems, hypotonia, urogenital, and hands/feet anomalies. The microdeletion identified in our patient is the smallest reported so far and, for this reason, useful to perform a detailed genotype-phenotype correlation. In particular, we propose the CELSR1, ATXN10, FBLN1, and UPK3A as candidate genes in the onset of the main clinical features of this contiguous gene syndrome. Thus, the patient reported here broadens our knowledge of the phenotypic consequences of 22q13.31 microdeletions facilitating genotype-phenotype correlations. Additional cases are needed to corroborate our hypothesis and confirm genotype-phenotype correlations of this emerging syndrome.

A New Case of the Rare 10q22.3q23.2 Microdeletion Flanked by Low-Copy Repeats 3/4

Deletions in the 10q22.3q23.2 region are rare and mediated by 2 low-copy repeats (LCRs 3 and 4). These deletions have already been recognized as the 10q22q23 deletion syndrome. The phenotype associated with this condition is rather uncharacteristic, and most common features are craniofacial dysmorphisms and developmental delay. We describe a boy with craniofacial dysmorphic features, developmental delay, tetralogy of Fallot, hand/foot abnormalities, and recurrent respiratory tract infections. Chromosomal microarray analysis disclosed a 7.8-Mb microdeletion at 10q22.3q23.2, flanked by LCRs 3/4, and an additional 16q12.1 microdeletion of 189 kb. This article reviews the clinical signs of reported cases with similar deletions and compares them with our patient, contributing to a better understanding of genotype-phenotype correlation.

Microdeletion of chromosome 1q21.3 in fraternal twins is associated with mental retardation, microcephaly, and epilepsy

Reported here are twins, both of whom have a 1q21.3 microdeletion and who exhibit key features common to previously reported cases such as microcephaly and developmental delay. However, some clinical findings and deleted genes differed from those in previously reported cases. The karyotype was normal 46, XX for both of the twins. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) identified a 2.6 Mb deletion on chromosome 1q21.3 (chr1: 153,514,121-156,171,335 bp) in case 1 and a 1.6 Mb deletion on chromosome 1q21.3 (chr1: 154,748,365-156,358,923 bp) in case 2. The deleted region includes DPM3, MUC1, GBA, PKLR, RIT1, and LAMTOR2 in both siblings. To the extent known, this is the second report of a 1q21.3 microdeletion in a family with mental retardation, developmental delay, seizures, and some dysmorphic features, thus expanding the phenotypic spectrum.

Array comparative genomic hybridization and genomic sequencing in the diagnostics of the causes of congenital anomalies

The aim of this review is to provide the current state of knowledge about the usefulness of modern genetic technologies in uncovering the causality of isolated and multiple congenital anomalies. Array comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing have revolutionized the clinical approach to patients with these phenotypes. Both technologies enable early diagnosis, especially in clinically challenging newborn populations, and help to uncover genetic defects associated with various phenotypes. The application of both complementary methods could assist in identifying many variants that may simultaneously be involved in the development of a number of isolated or multiple congenital anomalies. Both technologies carry serious variant misinterpretation risks as well. Therefore, the methods of variant classification and accessible variant databases are mentioned. A useful strategy of clinical genetic testing with the application of both methodologies is presented. Finally, future directions and challenges are briefly commented on in this review.

Clinical psychologists' attitudes towards the biology and 'new genetics' of intellectual and developmental disabilities: a pilot study using Q-methodology

BACKGROUND

The current study investigated how ideas and models from the 'New Genetics' and associated fields of developmental neuroscience and behavioural phenotypes are perceived by clinical psychologists working with people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). As well as examining the take-up and influence of such ideas, it also examines barriers, both personal and institutional, to the widespread adoption of such concepts and research findings in services for people with IDD.

METHODS

A Q-methodology study was undertaken with 31 qualified and 16 trainee clinical psychologists in the North West of England using a specifically developed 81-item Q set.

RESULTS

Three factors were identified and labelled Integration of social and medical models, Social model of disability is more helpful and Genetic advances in conflict with recognising the value of people with IDD.

CONCLUSION

There was a lack of consensus in clinical psychologists working with people with IDD, with amount and type of professional experience affecting the factor loadings, which may need to be considered in developing clinical applications of genetic IDD research.

Copy number variations and stroke

Stroke is the third leading cause of death worldwide after heart disease and all forms of cancers. Monogenic disorders, genetic, and environmental risk factors contribute to damaging cerebral blood vessels and, consequently, cause stroke. Developments in genomic research led to the discovery of numerous copy number variants (CNVs) that have been recently identified as a new tool for understanding the genetic basis of many diseases. This review discusses the current understanding of the types of stroke, the existing knowledge on the involvement of specific CNVs in stroke as well as the limitations of the methods used for detecting CNVs like SNP-microarray. To confirm an unequivocally association between CNVs and stroke and extend the current findings, it would be desirable to use another methodology to detect smaller CNVs or CNVs in genomic regions poorly covered by this technique, for instance, CGH-array.

Delineation of a recognizable phenotype for the recurrent LCR22-C to D/E atypical 22q11.2 deletion

The 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is typically caused by haploinsufficiency of a 3 Mb region that extends from LCR22-A until LCR22-D, while the recurrent recombination between any of the LCR22-D to H causes the 22q11.2 distal deletion syndrome. Here, we describe three patients with a de novo atypical ∼1.4 Mb 22q11.2 deletion that involves LCR22-C to a region beyond D (LCR22-C to D/E), encompassing the distal portion of the typical deleted region and the proximal portion of the distal deletion. We also review six previous published patients with the same rearrangement and compare their features with those found in patients with overlapping deletions. Patients with LCR22-C to D/E deletion present a recognizable phenotype characterized by facial dysmorphic features, high frequency of cardiac defects, including conotruncal defects, prematurity, growth restriction, microcephaly, and mild developmental delay. Genotype-phenotype analysis of the patients indicates that CRKL and MAPK1 genes play an important role as causative factors for the main clinical features of the syndrome. In particular, CRKL gene seems to be involved in the occurrence of conotruncal cardiac anomalies, mainly tetralogy of Fallot. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Copy number variants prioritization after array-CGH analysis - a cohort of 1000 patients

BACKGROUND

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization has been assumed to be the first genetic test offered to detect genomic imbalances in patients with unexplained intellectual disability with or without dysmorphisms, multiple congenital anomalies, learning difficulties and autism spectrum disorders. Our study contributes to the genotype/phenotype correlation with the delineation of laboratory criteria which help to classify the different copy number variants (CNVs) detected. We clustered our findings into five classes ranging from an imbalance detected in a microdeletion/duplication syndrome region (class I) to imbalances that had previously been reported in normal subjects in the Database of Genomic Variants (DGV) and thus considered common variants (class IV).

RESULTS

All the analyzed 1000 patients had at least one CNV independently of its clinical significance. Most of them, as expected, were alterations already reported in the DGV for normal individuals (class IV) or without known coding genes (class III-B). In approximately 14 % of the patients an imbalance involving known coding genes, but with partially overlapping or low frequency of CNVs described in the DGV was identified (class IIIA). In 10.4 % of the patients a pathogenic CNV that explained the phenotype was identified consisting of: 40 class I imbalances, 44 class II de novo imbalances and 21 class II X-chromosome imbalances in male patients. In 20 % of the patients a familial pathogenic or potentially pathogenic CNV, consisting of inherited class II imbalances, was identified that implied a family evaluation by the clinical geneticists.

CONCLUSIONS

As this interpretation can be sometimes difficult, particularly if it is not possible to study the parents, using the proposed classification we were able to prioritize the multiple imbalances that are identified in each patient without immediately having to classify them as pathogenic or benign.

[Current perspectives on genome-based diagnostic tests in Pediatrics]

Etiological diagnosis is essential in the clinical management of individual patients. Some children with complex medical conditions are subjected to numerous testing, known as "diagnostic odyssey", which often gives no conclusive results. In recent years, a revolution in genomic medicine is underway with the use of technologies that promise to increase the ability to make a diagnosis and reduce the time involved. The main advantages and limitations of genomic diagnosis, as opposed to usual methodologies are reviewed with an emphasis on Pediatrics.

1q21.1 microduplication in a patient with mental impairment and congenital heart defect

1q21.1 duplication is a rare copy number variant with multiple congenital malformations, including developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, dysmorphic features and congenital heart anomalies. The present study described a Chinese female patient (age, four years and eight months) with multiple malformations, including congenital heart defect, mental impairment and developmental delay. The parents and the monozygotic twin sister of the patient, however, were physically and psychologically normal. High-resolution genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism array revealed a 1.6-Mb duplication in chromosome region 1q21.1. This chromosome region contained HFE2, a critical gene involved in hereditary hemochromatosis. However, the parents and monozygotic twin sister of the patient did not carry this genomic lesion. To the best of our knowledge, the present study was the first to report on a 1q21.1 duplication patient in mainland China.

Gamut of genetic testing for neonatal care

The field of clinical genetics has advanced at an unprecedented pace. Today, with the aid of several high-resolution and high-precision technologies, physicians are able to make molecular genetic diagnoses for many infants affected with genetic disease. It is imperative, however, that perinatologists and neonatologists understand the strengths and limitations of genetic testing. This article discusses the different genetic testing options available for perinatal and neonatal diagnostics, along with their clinical utilities and indications. From variant-specific testing to whole-exome and genome sequencing, the article covers the whole gamut of genetic testing, with some thoughts on the changing paradigm of medical genetics.

Chromosomal microarrays testing in children with developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies

OBJECTIVES

Clinical use of microarray-based techniques for the analysis of many developmental disorders has emerged during the last decade. Thus, chromosomal microarray has been positioned as a first-tier test. This study reports the first experience in a Chilean cohort.

METHODS

Chilean patients with developmental disabilities and congenital anomalies were studied with a high-density microarray (CytoScan™ HD Array, Affymetrix, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). Patients had previous cytogenetic studies with either a normal result or a poorly characterized anomaly.

RESULTS

This study tested 40 patients selected by two or more criteria, including: major congenital anomalies, facial dysmorphism, developmental delay, and intellectual disability. Copy number variants (CNVs) were found in 72.5% of patients, while a pathogenic CNV was found in 25% of patients and a CNV of uncertain clinical significance was found in 2.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Chromosomal microarray analysis is a useful and powerful tool for diagnosis of developmental diseases, by allowing accurate diagnosis, improving the diagnosis rate, and discovering new etiologies. The higher cost is a limitation for widespread use in this setting.

Schizophrenia genes: on the matter of their convergence

Schizophrenia is a common mental disorder, affecting 0.5-1% of the population. The mode of inheritance is complex and non-Mendelian with a high heritability of ca. 65-80%. Given this complexity, until most recently it was difficult to identify disease genes. But fortunately this has changed. Due to new technologies the last few years have brought highest interest in human genetics of complex diseases. The knowledge resulting from the availability of the complete sequence of the human genome, the systematic identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) throughout the genome, and the development of parallel genotyping technology (microarrays) established the conditions that brought about the current successful time in our ability to probe the genome for identifying disease genes. All these studies showed up new avenues for the biology of common complex diseases and yielded a multitude of genes showing strong association with complex diseases.

Genomic Analyses of Patients With Unexplained Early-Onset Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

To test for rare genetic mutations, a cohort of patients with unexplained early-onset scoliosis (EOS) was screened using high-density microarray genotyping. A cohort of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) was similarly screened and the results were compared.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Patients with scoliosis in infancy or early childhood (EOS) are at high risk for progressive deformity and associated problems including respiratory compromise. Early-onset scoliosis is frequently associated with genetic disorders but many patients present with nonspecific clinical features and without an associated diagnosis. The authors hypothesized that EOS in these patients may be caused by rare genetic mutations detectable by next-generation genomic methods.

METHODS

The researchers identified 24 patients with unexplained EOS from pediatric orthopedic clinics. They genotyped them, along with 39 connecting family members, using the Illumina OmniExpress-12, version 1.0 beadchip. Resulting genotypes were analyzed for chromosomal changes, specifically copy number variation and absence of heterozygosity. They screened 482 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and 744 healthy controls, who were similarly genotyped with the same beadchip, for chromosomal changes identified in the EOS cohort.

RESULTS

Copy number variation and absence of heterozygosity analyses revealed a genetic diagnosis of chromosome 15q24 microdeletion syndrome in 1 patient and maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 14 in a second one. Prior genetic testing and clinical evaluations had been negative in both cases. A large novel chromosome 10 deletion was likely causal in a third EOS patient. These mutations identified in the EOS patients were absent in AIS patients and controls, and thus were not associated with AIS or found in asymptomatic individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

These data underscore the usefulness of updated genetic evaluations including high-density microarray-based genotyping and other next-generation methods in patients with unexplained EOS, even when prior genetic studies were negative. These data also suggest the intriguing possibility that other mutations detectable by whole genome sequencing, as well as epigenetic effects, await discovery in the EOS population.

Monozygotic twins with 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome

Chromosome 17q21.31 microdeletion syndrome is a genomic disorder caused by a recurrent 600 kb long deletion. The deletion affects the region of a common inversion present in about 20% of Europeans. The inversion is associated with the H2 haplotype carrying additional low-copy repeats susceptible to non-allelic homologous recombination, and this haplotype is prone to deletion. No instances of 17q21.31 deletions inherited from an affected parent have been reported, and the deletions always affected a parental chromosome with the H2 haplotype. The syndrome is characterized clinically by intellectual disability, hypotonia, friendly behavior and specific facial dysmorphism with long face, large tubular or pear-shaped nose and bulbous nasal tip. We present monozygotic twin sisters showing the typical clinical picture of the syndrome. The phenotype of the sisters was very similar, with a slightly more severe presentation in Twin B. The 17q21.31 microdeletion was confirmed in both patients but in neither of their parents. Potential copy number differences between the genomes of the twins were subsequently searched using high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and comparative genome hybridisation (CGH) arrays. However, these analyses identified no additional aberrations or genomic differences that could potentially be responsible for the subtle phenotypic differences. These could possibly be related to the more severe perinatal history of Twin B, or to the variable expressivity of the disorder. In accord with the expectations, one of the parents (the mother) was shown to carry the H2 haplotype, and the maternal allele of chromosome 17q21.31 was missing in the twins.

Further delineation of eye manifestations in homozygous 15q13.3 microdeletions including TRPM1: a differential diagnosis of ceroid lipofuscinosis

The 15q13.3 heterozygous microdeletion is a fairly common microdeletion syndrome with marked clinical variability and incomplete penetrance. The average size of the deletion, which comprises six genes including CHRNA7, is 1.5 Mb. CHRNA7 has been identified as the gene responsible for the neurological phenotype in this microdeletion syndrome. Only seven patients with a homozygous microdeletion that includes at least CHRNA7, and is inherited from both parents have been described in the literature. The aim of this study was to further describe the distinctive eye manifestations from the analysis in the three French patients diagnosed with the classical 1.5 Mb homozygous microdeletion. Patients' ages ranged from 30 months to 9 years, and included one sib pair. They all displayed a remarkably severe identifiable clinical phenotype that included congenital blindness and convulsive encephalopathy with inconstant abnormal movements. The ophthalmological examination revealed a lack of eye tracking, optic nerve pallor, an immature response with increased latencies with no response to the checkerboard stimulations at the visual evoked potential examination, and a distinctive retina dystrophy with a negative electroretinogram in which the "b" wave was smaller than the "a" wave after a dark adapted pupil and bright flash in all patients. Clear genotype-phenotype correlations emerged, showing that this eye phenotype was secondary to homozygous deletion of TRPM1, the gene responsible for autosomal recessive congenital stationary night blindness. The main differential diagnosis is ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Application of array comparative genomic hybridization in 256 patients with developmental delay or intellectual disability

We used whole-genome exon-targeted oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) in a cohort of 256 patients with developmental delay (DD)/intellectual disability (ID) with or without dysmorphic features, additional neurodevelopmental abnormalities, and/or congenital malformations. In 69 patients, we identified 84 non-polymorphic copy-number variants, among which 41 are known to be clinically relevant, including two recently described deletions, 4q21.21q21.22 and 17q24.2. Chromosomal microarray analysis revealed also 15 potentially pathogenic changes, including three rare deletions, 5q35.3, 10q21.3, and 13q12.11. Additionally, we found 28 copy-number variants of unknown clinical significance. Our results further support the notion that copy-number variants significantly contribute to the genetic etiology of DD/ID and emphasize the efficacy of the detection of novel candidate genes for neurodevelopmental disorders by whole-genome array CGH.

Screening of UBE3A gene in patients referred for Angelman Syndrome

Angelman Syndrome (AS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by severe developmental delay, speech impairment and unique behaviors including inappropriate laughter and happy disposition. AS is related to deficient maternal UBE3A gene expression caused either by chromosomal deletions, uniparental disomy, molecular defects of the imprinted 15q11-q13 critical region or by loss of function mutations in the maternally inherited UBE3A. In the present study, screening UBE3A was performed in 43 patients who were referred for AS but whom previous molecular diagnostic tests failed to provide a diagnosis. Two causative mutations--one of them novel--and four polymorphic variants one of which is also novel were revealed. Further investigation of 7 patients disclosed defects in other genes involved in clinical phenotypes mimicking AS. A typical EEG pattern and microcephaly in patients with developmental delay prompt for AS investigation while wide genetic screening should be applied to help resolution of the complex phenotypes characterized by developmental delay.

Prenatal testing for intellectual disability: misperceptions and reality with lessons from Down syndrome

Down syndrome is the most common cause of intellectual disability. In the United States, it is recommended that prenatal testing for Down syndrome be offered to all women. Because of this policy and consequent public perception, having Down syndrome has become a disadvantage in the prenatal period. However, in the postnatal period, there may be some advantage in having Down syndrome. To help parents make informed decisions about screening and testing, it is crucial to reconcile divergent prenatal and postnatal perspectives. Advancements in genetic technologies will also impact the informed consent process and need to be considered.

Meeting the challenge of interpreting high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array data in prenatal diagnosis: does increased diagnostic power outweigh the dilemma of rare variants?

OBJECTIVE

Several studies have already shown the superiority of chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) compared with conventional karyotyping for prenatal investigation of fetal ultrasound abnormality. This study used very high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to determine the impact on detection rates of all clinical categories of copy number variations (CNVs), and address the issue of interpreting and communicating findings of uncertain or unknown clinical significance, which are to be expected at higher frequency when using very high-resolution CMA.

DESIGN

Prospective validation study.

SETTING

Tertiary clinical genetics centre.

POPULATION

Women referred for further investigation of fetal ultrasound anomaly.

METHODS

We prospectively tested 104 prenatal samples using both conventional karyotyping and high-resolution arrays.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The detection rates for each clinical category of CNV.

RESULTS

Unequivocal pathogenic CNVs were found in six cases, including one with uniparental disomy (paternal UPD 14). A further four cases had a 'likely pathogenic' finding. Overall, CMA improved the detection of 'pathogenic' and 'likely pathogenic' abnormalities from 2.9% (3/104) to 9.6% (10/104). CNVs of 'unknown' clinical significance that presented interpretational difficulties beyond results from parental investigations were detected in 6.7% (7/104) of samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased detection sensitivity appears to be the main benefit of high-resolution CMA. Despite this, in this cohort there was no significant benefit in terms of improving detection of small pathogenic CNVs. A potential disadvantage is the high detection rate of CNVs of 'unknown' clinical significance. These findings emphasise the importance of establishing an evidence-based policy for the interpretation and reporting of CNVs, and the need to provide appropriate pre- and post-test counselling.

Complex craniosynostosis is associated with the 2p15p16.1 microdeletion syndrome

In a screening project of patients with (complex) craniosynostosis using genomic arrays, we identified two patients with craniosynostosis and microcephaly with a deletion in the 2p15p16.1 chromosomal region. This region has been associated with a new microdeletion syndrome, for which patients have various features in common, including microcephaly and intellectual disability. Deletions were identified using Affymetrix 250K SNP array and further characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and qPCR. The deletions in our two patients overlapped within the 2p15p16.1 microdeletion syndrome area and were 6.8 and 6.9 Mb in size, respectively. FISH and qPCR confirmed the presence of only one copy in this region. Finemapping of the breakpoints indicated precise borders in our patients and were further finemapped in two other previously reported patients. Clinical features of patients with deletions in the 2p15p16.1 region vary. Including data from our patients, now eight out of nine reported patients have microcephaly, one of the major features, and all had intellectual disability. The current reported two patients add different forms of craniosynostosis to the clinical spectrum of this recently recognized microdeletion syndrome.

Chromosome disorders associated with epilepsy

Epilepsy is a feature of several hundred chromosome abnormalities. However, there are relatively few conditions in which epilepsy is a consistent feature and even fewer in which the electroclinical phenotype is recognizable. Advances in cytogenetics and molecular genetics are leading to the detection of more complex and smaller chromosomal re-arrangements, duplications, and deletions using techniques such as comparative genome hybridization (CGH). This will provide new challenges for the epilepsy specialist who, in partnership with the geneticist, will have to judge the clinical relevance of these abnormalities. Most chromosome anomalies associated with epilepsy are individually rare therefore clinicians must continue to collaborate to describe novel electroclinical phenotypes. Cytogenetic studies should be requested in all individuals with refractory epilepsy and no clear underlying cause even in cases with no dysmorphic features, no learning disability, and an EEG suggestive of genetic generalized epilepsy. In syndromes where epilepsy is a consistent feature the seizure semiology and EEG features can suggest a specific diagnosis and guide the clinician to the appropriate cytogenetic investigation. An early correct diagnosis can save unnecessary investigations and guide prognosis. Children with chromosomal disorders frequently have learning disability, which can be further compromised by an epileptic encephalopathy. Medications should be targeted to specific seizure types.

Molecular karyotyping by array CGH in a Russian cohort of children with intellectual disability, autism, epilepsy and congenital anomalies

Background

Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) has been repeatedly shown to be a successful tool for the identification of genomic variations in a clinical population. During the last decade, the implementation of array CGH has resulted in the identification of new causative submicroscopic chromosome imbalances and copy number variations (CNVs) in neuropsychiatric (neurobehavioral) diseases. Currently, array-CGH-based technologies have become an integral part of molecular diagnosis and research in individuals with neuropsychiatric disorders and children with intellectual disability (mental retardation) and congenital anomalies. Here, we introduce the Russian cohort of children with intellectual disability, autism, epilepsy and congenital anomalies analyzed by BAC array CGH and a novel bioinformatic strategy.

Results

Among 54 individuals highly selected according to clinical criteria and molecular and cytogenetic data (from 2426 patients evaluated cytogenetically and molecularly between November 2007 and May 2012), chromosomal imbalances were detected in 26 individuals (48%). In two patients (4%), a previously undescribed condition was observed. The latter has been designated as meiotic (constitutional) genomic instability resulted in multiple submicroscopic rearrangements (including CNVs). Using bioinformatic strategy, we were able to identify clinically relevant CNVs in 15 individuals (28%). Selected cases were confirmed by molecular cytogenetic and molecular genetic methods. Eight out of 26 chromosomal imbalances (31%) have not been previously reported. Among them, three cases were co-occurrence of subtle chromosome 9 and 21 deletions.

Conclusions

We conducted an array CGH study of Russian patients suffering from intellectual disability, autism, epilepsy and congenital anomalies. In total, phenotypic manifestations of clinically relevant genomic variations were found to result from genomic rearrangements affecting 1247 disease-causing and pathway-involved genes. Obviously, a significantly lesser part of them are true candidates for intellectual disability, autism or epilepsy. The success of our preliminary array CGH and bioinformatic study allows us to expand the cohort. According to the available literature, this is the first comprehensive array CGH evaluation of a Russian cohort of children with neuropsychiatric disorders and congenital anomalies.